26
1 Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of 1 lupus 2 3 4 Xin M. Luo 1 # ([email protected]) 5 Michael R. Edwards 1 ([email protected]) 6 Qinghui Mu 1 ([email protected]) 7 Yang Yu 2 ([email protected]) 8 Miranda D. Vieson 1 ([email protected]) 9 Christopher M. Reilly 3 ([email protected]) 10 S. Ansar Ahmed 1 ([email protected]) 11 Adegbenga A. Bankole 4 # ([email protected]) 12 13 14 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary 15 Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 16 2 Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los 17 Angeles, California 18 3 Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, Virginia 19 4 Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia 20 21 #Address correspondence to Xin M. Luo, [email protected]; and Adegbenga A. Bankole, 22 [email protected] 23 24 25 26 Running title: Lupus and Microbiota 27 28 AEM Accepted Manuscript Posted Online 1 December 2017 Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.02288-17 Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. on March 13, 2020 by guest http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from

Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

1

Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of 1

lupus 2

3

4

Xin M. Luo1# ([email protected]) 5

Michael R. Edwards1 ([email protected]) 6

Qinghui Mu1 ([email protected]) 7

Yang Yu2 ([email protected]) 8

Miranda D. Vieson1 ([email protected]) 9

Christopher M. Reilly3 ([email protected]) 10

S. Ansar Ahmed1 ([email protected]) 11

Adegbenga A. Bankole4# ([email protected]) 12

13

14 1Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary 15

Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 16 2Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los 17

Angeles, California 18 3Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, Virginia 19

4Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia 20

21

#Address correspondence to Xin M. Luo, [email protected]; and Adegbenga A. Bankole, 22

[email protected] 23

24

25

26

Running title: Lupus and Microbiota 27

28

AEM Accepted Manuscript Posted Online 1 December 2017Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.02288-17Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 2: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

2

Abstract 29

Gut microbiota dysbiosis has been observed in a number of autoimmune diseases. However, the role of 30

gut microbiota in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a prototypical autoimmune disease characterized 31

by persistent inflammation in multiple organs of the body, remains elusive. Here we report the dynamics 32

of gut microbiota in a murine lupus model, NZB/W F1, as well as intestinal dysbiosis in a small group 33

of SLE patients with active disease. The composition of gut microbiota changed markedly before and 34

after the onset of lupus disease in NZB/W F1 mice, with higher diversity and increased representation of 35

several bacterial species as lupus progressed from pre-disease to the diseased stage. However, we did 36

not control for age and the cage effect. Using dexamethasone as an intervention to treat SLE-like signs, 37

we also found that a higher abundance of a group of Lactobacilli (to which a species assignment could 38

not be made) in the gut microbiota might be correlated with more severe disease in NZB/W F1 mice. 39

Results of the human study suggest that, compared to controls without immune-mediated diseases, SLE 40

patients with active lupus disease possessed an altered gut microbiota that was different in several 41

particular bacterial species (within the genera Odoribacter, Blautia and unnamed genus under the family 42

Rikenellaceae), less diverse, and with increased representation of Gram-negative bacteria. The ratio of 43

Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes was not different between SLE microbiota and Non-SLE controls in our 44

human cohort. 45

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 3: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

3

Importance 46

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 47

of gut microbiota has been reported in both mouse and human with SLE. However, as an emerging field 48

more studies are required to delineate the roles of gut microbiota in different lupus-prone mouse models 49

and people with diverse manifestations of SLE. Here, we report changes of gut microbiota in NZB/W F1 50

lupus-prone mice and a group of SLE patients with active disease. 51

52

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 4: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

4

Introduction 53

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototypical autoimmune disease that affects almost all organs 54

of the body. It exhibits diverse manifestations that are a challenge to clinicians. The etiology of SLE is 55

unclear, but evidence has shown that it is influenced by genetic, environmental, hormonal, and 56

epigenetic factors (1). Together these factors act on the immune system and cause abnormalities 57

including the generation of autoantibody-producing B cells and autoreactive T cells, as well as abnormal 58

production of proinflammatory cytokines. The hallmark of the disease is characterized by severe 59

inflammation at target organs that leads to tissue damage. The products of damaged cells are picked up 60

by autoantibodies to create immune complexes that activate antigen-presenting cells, which in turn 61

induce more inflammatory T cells and proinflammatory cytokines, creating a vicious cycle of 62

inflammation (2). Current standard of care treatments for SLE are mainly nonselective 63

immunosuppressants (3). Not all patients respond to these treatments, and systemic immunosuppression 64

is a major cause of concern. Higher incidence of and more severe infections have been observed in 65

patients taking long-term non-selective immunosuppressants (4). There is an imperative need to better 66

understand the pathogenesis of SLE, from which new treatment strategies may be developed. 67

Environmental factors, including diet, modern medicine and environmental microbes, are 68

involved in the etiology of SLE. This is supported by observations in both human and mouse. The 69

incidence of SLE is significantly higher in African Americans than West Africans, although the two 70

populations are genetically very similar (5). In lupus-prone mice, the involvement of environmental 71

factors is evidenced by the progressive loss of SLE-like phenotype observed in the classical lupus-prone 72

strain MRL/Mp-Faslpr

(MRL/lpr) over several years at The Jackson Laboratory under specific pathogen-73

free conditions, while no deviation from the original strain was detected at the genetic or epigenetic 74

level (Stock Number 006825). As diet, medicine and environmental microbes can influence the 75

composition of host microbiota, efforts have been made to understand the dynamics of microbiota—76

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 5: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

5

largely commensal bacteria living in our gut—in the pathogenesis of SLE. Oral antibiotics are known to 77

trigger lupus flares (6-8), suggesting a role for commensal bacteria in SLE. Our research team has 78

recently described changes of gut microbiota in lupus-prone mice vs. healthy controls (9), where a 79

decrease of Lactobacillaceae and an increase of Lachnospiraceae were observed in the MRL/lpr mouse 80

model (Jackson Laboratory Stock Number 000485). Interestingly, a treatment that improved lupus-like 81

symptoms also restored lactobacilli (9). Based on these observations, we administered Lactobacillus 82

spp. to MRL/lpr mice and showed a striking effect of the probiotics in ameliorating lupus nephritis (10). 83

This suggests that lupus disease could be controlled by changes of the gut microbiota. In another lupus-84

prone mouse model SNF1, a higher abundance of the Rikenellaceae family of commensal bacteria was 85

found to be associated with more severe SLE-like disease (11). Moreover, increased bacterial diversity 86

was observed in both MRL/lpr and SNF1 mouse models (9, 11). In human SLE, a cross-sectional study 87

showed that the fecal microbiota of SLE patients with inactive disease had a significantly lower 88

Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio than that of healthy controls (12). A lower Firmicutes to 89

Bacteroidetes ratio is also evident in other autoimmune diseases (13, 14). The fecal microbiota of SLE 90

patients was also a stronger inducer of T helper-17 (Th17) differentiation than healthy control fecal 91

microbiota (15), whereas the Th17 response is considered a primary driver of autoimmunity in SLE (16-92

20). 93

Here, we report the dynamics of gut microbiota in another murine lupus model, NZB/W F1, as 94

well as an altered gut microbiota in a small group of SLE patients. 95

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 6: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

6

Materials and Methods 96

Mice. Female NZB/W F1 mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and 97

maintained in a specific pathogen-free facility according to the requirements of Institutional Animal 98

Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Virginia Tech. For the time course, fecal pellets were collected 99

from untreated mice at 10, 14, 18, 23, 28, and 33 weeks of age, respectively. For the 10-, 14-, 18-week 100

time points, the same cage of mice (n=5) were sampled according to age. For the 23-, 28-, 33-week time 101

points, three different cages of mice (each representing a time point, n=3-4 for cage) were sampled. For 102

the experiment involving dexamethasone (Dex), age-matched mice treated with either Dex or vehicle 103

control were euthanized at 34 weeks of age. Hydroxy-propyl-methyl cellulose (HPMC, Sigma, St. 104

Louis, MO) was diluted in sterile deionized water at a concentration of 0.05%, autoclaved, then used as 105

the vehicle for the drug solutions. Ten mice (n=5 per cage per group) were included in each of the two 106

groups: vehicle control (HPMC) or 2 mg/kg Dex. Intraperitoneal injections were performed 5 times per 107

week with a 50 l volume of their respective treatments beginning at 20 weeks of age, and treatments 108

continued until euthanasia. Proteinuria (measured with Chemstrips) and body weight were measured 109

biweekly before treatment, then weekly after treatment began. 110

111

Evaluation of SLE-like disease in mice. Renal function was assessed and calculated as previously 112

described (9). The serum level of anti-double stranded DNA autoantibodies was measured as previously 113

described (21). Systemic autoimmunity was calculated as follows: (serum level of anti-dsDNA + 500 114

spleen-to-body weight ratio) / 2, where the coefficient 500 equalized the averages of the two variables. 115

116

Human subjects. The patients were enrolled at the lupus clinic in a single center in Southwest Roanoke, 117

Virginia. All patients met the 2009 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinic (SLICC) revised 118

American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria for SLE. At the time of enrollment, the 119

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 7: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

7

medication list was collected and an SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) score was obtained. The 120

inclusion criteria were: age 18-75, fulfilling SLICC revised ACR criteria for SLE (2009), and on or 121

eligible for immunosuppressive therapy. The exclusion criteria were: age <18 or >75, not meeting 122

SLICC revised ACR criteria for SLE, disease not needing immunosuppressive therapy, pregnancy, 123

presence of other immune diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, on or recent use of antibiotics, 124

and vulnerable patients including prisoners, non-English speakers and critically ill patients. 125

126

Microbiota sampling, 16S rRNA analysis, and metagenome prediction. Mouse fecal microbiota were 127

obtained by taking individual mice out of their cage and collecting a fecal pellet. Colonic microbiota 128

samples were collected within 20 min after euthanasia. To avoid cross-contamination, each microbiota 129

sample was collected by removing the colon and extruding the fecal material into a sterile 1.5 mL 130

Eppendorf tube using a new pair of sterile forceps. Human fecal samples were collected from patients at 131

Carilion Medical Center in Roanoke, VA, between 2015 and 2016. For stool samples, patients were 132

provided with a collection “pot” and requested to bring in a specimen collected the day before a routine 133

visit. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Virginia Tech Carilion 134

School of Medicine. All microbiota samples were stored at -80°C until being processed at the same 135

time. Sample homogenization, cell lysis, DNA extraction and PCR of the 16S-V4 region were 136

performed with the same methods described in a previous report (9). Purified amplicons were sequenced 137

bi-directionally (paired-end 150 bp) on an Illumina MiSeq at Argonne National Laboratory. Sequence 138

read merge, quality filtering, de-replication, chimera removal, and OTU clustering were performed with 139

the UPARSE pipeline implemented in the USEARCH program version 8.1/1831 (22). Bacterial 140

taxonomy was assigned by using the ‘UclustConsensusTaxonAssigner’ implemented in QIIME (23) 141

against the Greengene reference database (24, 25), and summarized at all taxonomic levels (26). Alpha- 142

and beta-diversity metrics were computed with QIIME. Alpha-diversity included Shannon diversity 143

index and observed OTUs, and beta-diversity included unweighted UniFrac distance metrics (27, 28). 144

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 8: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

8

Sequencing data have been deposited (NCBI SRA SRP092445), and the OTU results for all experiments 145

can be found in the supplemental materials. 146

147

Statistics. Two-sample comparison was performed by Student’s t-test or nonparametric Mann-Whitney 148

rank-based test. For >2 groups, one-way ANOVA or the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was 149

performed. Because the Kruskal-Wallis test assumes identical distributions in each group, we also 150

performed ‘oneway.test’ in R for comparing means without assuming equal variances. Correlation 151

analysis using Spearman rank-based methods was performed. PCoA was tested for significance by a 152

permutational multivariate method PERMANOVA (29). When studying age as fixed effect and mouse 153

subject as random effect, we used the linear mixed model implemented in the ‘nlme’ package in R. P 154

values were corrected for multiple comparisons by controlling false discovery rates (FDR). All statistical 155

computations were performed in R version 3.3.1. 156

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 9: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

9

Results 157

Dynamics of gut microbiota in NZB/W F1 mice 158

Like MRL/lpr mice, the disease phenotype in NZB/W F1 mice resembles human SLE and is 159

characterized by high levels of antinuclear antibodies, hemolytic anemia, proteinuria, and progressive 160

immune complex glomerulonephritis. These mice have been used as a model for human SLE since the 161

early 1960s due to their genetic resemblance of the complex multifactorial disease. Similar to human 162

SLE that has a strong female bias, the disease is most pronounced in female NZB/W F1 mice. The 163

average lifespan for females is 8 months, with disease onset at approximately 5 months (20 weeks) of 164

age. Thus, the disease progression is much slower in NZB/W F1 mice than in MRL/lpr mice. 165

To determine the dynamics of gut microbiota during lupus progression in female NZB/W F1 166

mice, we analyzed fecal pellets collected at 3 pre-disease time points (10, 14, 18 weeks of age) and 3 167

post-disease onset, or diseased, time points (23, 28, 33 weeks of age). The structure and diversity of 168

lupus-associated microbiota changed continuously over time (Figure 1). The unweighted UniFrac 169

distance-based principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) showed that the gut microbiota was distinct at 3 170

different pre-disease time points, but clustered together at the diseased time points (Figure 1A and 171

Figure S1). Importantly, the UniFrac distance between pre-disease and diseased time points was greater 172

than the distance observed within the 3 pre-disease time points. In addition, the gut microbiota split into 173

two groups along the PC1 axis (P < 0.01, PERMANOVA), and the split happened at around 20 weeks of 174

age, suggesting a dramatic change of gut microbiota upon the onset of SLE-like symptoms. It is worth 175

noting that we cannot rule out the cage effects that may be driving the differences in Figure 1A, and that 176

we do not have a wildtype control for the effects of aging on the microbiota. 177

We next determined the change of microbiota diversity during lupus progression in NZB/W F1 178

mice. The number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in these mice increased significantly from 179

pre-disease to diseased stages (P < 0.001, Figure 1B), suggesting increased bacterial diversity as disease 180

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 10: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

10

progressed. This is consistent with other lupus-prone mouse models where lupus-associated increase in 181

microbiota diversity was also observed (9, 11). Individual bacterial species fluctuated during the time 182

course tested, and the species with significant changes are shown in Figure 1C. Specifically, significant 183

increases from pre-disease to diseased stage were observed for several bacterial species under the genera 184

Clostridium, Dehalobacerium, Lactobacillus, Oscillospira, Dorea (family Lachnospiraceae), Bilophila 185

(family Desulfovibrionaceae), AF12 (family Rikenellaceae), and an unnamed genus within the family 186

Ruminococcaceae (P < 0.01 for all cases). Akkermansia muciniphila and a species within the genus 187

Anerostipes (family Lachnospiraceae), on the other hand, significantly decreased from pre-disease to 188

diseased stage (P < 0.01). These results suggest that the composition of gut microbiota changed 189

markedly before and after the onset of lupus disease in NZB/W F1 mice, with higher diversity and 190

increased representation of several bacterial species as lupus progressed from pre-disease to the diseased 191

stage. It is worth noting that these changes may also be caused by the maturation of bacterial 192

communities as the mice aged. 193

To determine whether a common treatment of SLE could reverse the changes in gut microbiota, 194

we treated NZB/W F1 mice with 2 mg/kg body weight dexamethasone (Dex) from 20 to 34 weeks of 195

age (14 weeks of treatment). Prior studies have shown that Dex suppresses the development of disease 196

in NZB/W F1 lupus-prone mice (30). Treatment with Dex altered the microbiota as the animals aged 197

compared to the vehicle-treated controls (Figure 2). The overall microbiota structure with Dex treatment 198

was distinct from the vehicle treatment (Control) as shown in the unweighted UniFrac-based PCoA plot 199

(Figure 2A, P < 0.01). Interestingly, instead of decreasing the bacterial diversity that was already high in 200

diseased mice (Figure 1B), Dex appeared to have further increased the diversity with a significantly 201

higher Shannon index and higher observed OTUs (Figure 2B and Figure S2, P < 0.001 for both cases). 202

Notably, the community variability decreased (Figure 2A) while diversity increased (Figure 2B) in Dex-203

treated mice compared to control mice. We interpret that high diversity in the Dex group may lead to a 204

more stable community, therefore the lower observed variability than the control group. 205

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 11: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

11

We next identified the bacterial species with significant changes from pre-disease onset (pre) to 206

post-disease onset (post) and whether Dex treatment significantly reversed such changes. Only one 207

bacterial species, Lactobacillaceae_Lactobacillus_Other, fulfilled these criteria (Figure 2C). The 208

relative abundance of this species significantly increased from 0.01% at pre-disease stage to 10% post-209

disease onset, and Dex was able to significantly decrease it to 1% (P < 0.01 in both cases). BLAST 210

(Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) analysis showed that the OTU sequences within 211

Lactobacillaceae_Lactobacillus_Other were at least 98% identical to those of Lactobacillus murinus, 212

Lactobacillus kimchicus, and Lactobacillus senmaizukei. Among the three, only Lactobacillus murinus 213

was isolated from mice (the other two were from kimchi and Japanese pickle, respectively). However, 214

there could be unsequenced isolates that could be represented by the sequence obtained from the 16S 215

analysis; therefore, the isolate(s)’ identity is unknown but could be one or more of the three detected 216

species. We further studied Spearman association coefficients between this bacterial species and two 217

measurements of SLE disease state, renal function (abbreviated as RenalFunc in Figure 2D) and 218

systemic autoimmunity (abbreviated as SysAuto in Figure 2D). The renal function was calculated as a 219

composite score between the level of proteinuria and histopathological score, whereas systemic 220

autoimmunity was calculated as a composite score between the level of anti-double stranded DNA 221

autoantibodies and the weight of spleen (see Materials and Methods for details). Correlation analysis 222

showed that Lactobacillaceae_Lactobacillus_Other was positively associated with renal functions 223

(correlation efficient 0.38, P = 0.094) and systemic autoimmunity (correlation efficient 0.42, P = 0.067), 224

although the associations were not statistically significant. These results suggest that a higher abundance 225

of a group of Lactobacilli (to which a species assignment could not be made) in the gut microbiota may 226

be associated with more severe clinical signs in female NZB/W F1 mice. This is distinct from what has 227

been observed for female MRL/lpr mice, where a higher abundance of Lactobacillus reuteri was found 228

to be associated with disease attenuation (9, 10). 229

230

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 12: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

12

Gut microbiota dysbiosis in human SLE patients 231

To study the differences in gut microbiota of patients with SLE compared to patients without immune-232

mediated diseases, we enrolled 14 patients with active SLE and 17 Non-SLE controls. Although the 233

overall community structure could not be separated by unweighted UniFrac-based PCoA analysis 234

(Figure 3A), SLE subjects had significantly lower diversity measured as Shannon index (Figure 3B, P < 235

0.05, Mann-Whitney test). Unlike the published comparison between healthy controls and SLE patients 236

where the ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes was significantly lower in SLE patients in remission (12), 237

the ratio was not significantly different between our cohort of SLE patients and Non-SLE controls 238

(Figure 3C, P > 0.05). In addition, the bacterial phylum Proteobacteria (a representation of facultative 239

anaerobic Gram-negative bacteria) was significantly higher in the gut microbiota of SLE patients 240

(Figure 3D, P < 0.05). This is consistent with the increased serum level of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) 241

endotoxin in SLE patients that was observed by others (31). Three bacterial species appeared to be 242

differentially represented in SLE subjects compared to Non-SLE controls (Figure 3E, P < 0.05 based on 243

both nonparametric Mann-Whitney test and DESeq2). They were each within the genera Odoribacter, 244

Blautia (family Lachnospiraceae) and an unnamed genus (family Rikenellaceae). BLAST analyses on 245

the OTU sequences were performed and the identified species are presented in Table 1. These results 246

suggest that compared to controls without immune-mediated diseases, SLE patients with active lupus 247

disease possessed an altered gut microbiota that was different in several bacterial species, less diverse, 248

and with increased representation of Gram-negative bacteria. Medication (Table 2) may influence the 249

composition and diversity of gut microbiota, but due to the small sample size, we did not attempt to 250

analyze the effects of medication. 251

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 13: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

13

Discussion 252

In our studies, we analyzed the gut microbiota of NZB/W F1 mice and SLE patients with active disease 253

by using 16S rRNA sequencing. In NZB/W F1 mice, significant differences were observed in the gut 254

microbiota between pre-disease and diseased mice, and between untreated mice vs. mice treated with the 255

immunosuppressive drug Dex. The microbiota tends to be more diverse as disease progresses, and after 256

Dex treatment. In addition, a higher relative abundance of a group of Lactobacilli (to which a species 257

assignment could not be made) in the gut microbiota may be associated with deteriorated disease in 258

NZB/W F1 mice. Fewer differences were found in the comparison between Non-SLE individuals and 259

SLE patients with active disease. The fecal microbiota was less diverse in SLE patients, whereas the 260

Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was not different between the two groups. Interestingly, the relative 261

abundance of Proteobacteria representing LPS-containing Gram-negative bacteria was significantly 262

increased in SLE microbiota. 263

We found that human SLE patients have an altered microbiome in active disease when compared 264

to Non-SLE controls. The studies expand those of Hevia et al. (12) that reported SLE patients with 265

inactive lupus disease had a significantly lower Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio than healthy control 266

individuals. However, we did not observe a similar change of the ratio in our cohort. This is possibly 267

due to differences in study designs: 1) there may be differences between the gut microbiotas of patients 268

with active and inactive disease; 2) we included both female and male SLE patients of different 269

ethnicities with various levels of lupus disease manifestations, whereas Hevia et al. included only female 270

Caucasians with SLEDAI scores of lower than 8; and 3) we had chosen to include SLE patients in need 271

of immunosuppressive therapies, whereas Hevia et al. excluded those who had taken steroid or 272

immunological treatments. Our inclusion/exclusion criteria selected subjects that may better represent 273

the SLE patient population, because SLE disproportionately affects African Americans, and it does 274

occur in men in addition to women. 275

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 14: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

14

The use of nonselective immunosuppressive therapies in lupus patients, such as Dex and 276

azathioprine, may have broad consequences on the gut microbiota. A study by Huang et al. showed that 277

Dex treatment can alter the gut microbiota in healthy C57BL/6 wild type mice by increasing the 278

prevalence of Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Bifidobacterium, and that in an inflammatory bowel 279

disease model, the microbiota from Dex-treated donor mice can reduce colonic inflammation by reduced 280

IL-12p40 and IL-17 production compared to control donor mice (32). This evidence suggests that even 281

as immunosuppressive medications are directly acting to suppress inflammation from the patient’s cell, 282

these medications may also contribute to the formation of a microbiome that promotes the regulation of 283

inflammation locally in the gastrointestinal tract, and potentially at distant sites in the body. All human 284

fecal samples were from patients taking immunosuppressive medications. The characterization of the 285

gut microbiota from SLE patients who have not yet started therapy, compared to their respective 286

microbiota following treatment, would allow for a better understanding of how these broad-acting 287

medications are able to modulate microbial dysbiosis and affect the resultant autoimmune disease 288

phenotype. 289

In our previous studies we had compared the fecal microbiota of MRL/lpr mice to that of MRL 290

control mice (9). In this study, however, we did not compare the fecal microbiota of NZB/W F1 mice to 291

that of a control mouse strain. People have used NZB or NZW mice as controls for NZB/W F1 mice, but 292

both of these strains can develop anti-DNA autoantibodies and glomerulonephritis (according to 293

descriptions on the Jackson Laboratory website) like NZB/W F1. C57BL/6 mice is another possible 294

control strain. Without a control mouse strain, our results on the changes of microbiota over time (Figure 295

1) could be interpreted as either disease-related or age-related. Either way, our results are informative 296

because they provide new information on the longitudinal changes of gut microbiota in one additional 297

lupus-prone mouse strain. In addition, we tried to control for the cage effect (Figure S1). For the 10-, 14-298

, 18-week time points, we sampled the same cage of animals depending on the age, but the microbiota 299

was distinct. For the 23-, 28-, 33-week time points, while their microbiota clustered together, these 300

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 15: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

15

samples were collected from 3 different cages, with each cage representing a time point. While our 301

intention had been to control for the cage effect, this design was not adequate. In particular, our results 302

may have been confounded by the time of sample collection. A better study design should involve both 303

the same cage of animals sampled at different times, and different ages of animals sampled at the same 304

time. It would be also interesting to co-house mice of different ages and determine whether the 305

microbiotas are still distinct. 306

We attempted to identify consensus in the changes of gut microbiota between mice (NZB/W F1, 307

MRL/lpr and SNF1) and our cohort of SLE patients. While it is consistent among different lupus-prone 308

mouse models that the gut microbiotas were more diverse as disease progressed, the microbial diversity 309

was significantly lower in SLE patients with active disease compared to Non-SLE controls. The only 310

consensus between mouse and human was the relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae that was 311

significantly higher in both MRL/lpr mice (9) and SLE patients. However, in humans the increase was 312

limited to a species in the genus Blautia; when looking at the entire Lachnospiraceae family, the 313

difference was no longer evident. In future investigations, we will try to enroll a larger population of 314

SLE patients, divide them based on different disease manifestations, and analyze the gut microbiota 315

separately. This way consensus may be achieved between mouse and human enabling us to continue 316

using mice to model the human disease with regard to the roles of microbiome in lupus. 317

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 16: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

16

Acknowledgements 318

We thank Sarah Henderson for coordinating the collection of patient samples, Sarah Owens and 319

Saikumar Karyala for assistance on Illumina MiSeq sequencing, Husen Zhang for microbiome analysis, 320

and Yingxing Wu for assisting in statistical analysis. 321

322

Conflict of Interest Statement 323

The authors declare no conflict of interest (such as defined by ASM policy). 324

325

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 17: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

17

References 326

1. Tsokos GC. 2011. Systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 365:2110-21. 327 2. Ohl K, Tenbrock K. 2011. Inflammatory cytokines in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Biomed 328

Biotechnol 2011:432595. 329 3. Lech M, Anders HJ. 2013. The pathogenesis of lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 24:1357-66. 330 4. Tektonidou MG, Wang Z, Dasgupta A, Ward MM. 2015. Burden of Serious Infections in Adults 331

With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A National Population-Based Study, 1996-2011. Arthritis 332 Care Res (Hoboken) 67:1078-85. 333

5. Symmons DP. 1995. Frequency of lupus in people of African origin. Lupus 4:176-8. 334 6. Lawson TM, Amos N, Bulgen D, Williams BD. 2001. Minocycline-induced lupus: clinical features 335

and response to rechallenge. Rheumatology (Oxford) 40:329-35. 336 7. Margolis DJ, Hoffstad O, Bilker W. 2007. Association or lack of association between tetracycline 337

class antibiotics used for acne vulgaris and lupus erythematosus. Br J Dermatol 157:540-6. 338 8. Pope J, Jerome D, Fenlon D, Krizova A, Ouimet J. 2003. Frequency of adverse drug reactions 339

in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 30:480-4. 340 9. Zhang H, Liao X, Sparks JB, Luo XM. 2014. Dynamics of gut microbiota in autoimmune lupus. 341

Appl Environ Microbiol 80:7551-60. 342 10. Mu Q, Zhang H, Liao X, Lin K, Liu H, Edwards MR, Ahmed SA, Yuan R, Li L, Cecere TE, 343

Branson DB, Kirby JL, Goswami P, Leeth CM, Read KA, Oestreich KJ, Vieson MD, Reilly CM, 344 Luo XM. 2017. Control of lupus nephritis by changes of gut microbiota. Microbiome 5:73. 345

11. Johnson BM, Gaudreau MC, Al-Gadban MM, Gudi R, Vasu C. 2015. Impact of dietary deviation 346 on disease progression and gut microbiome composition in lupus-prone SNF1 mice. Clin Exp 347 Immunol 181:323-37. 348

12. Hevia A, Milani C, Lopez P, Cuervo A, Arboleya S, Duranti S, Turroni F, Gonzalez S, Suarez A, 349 Gueimonde M, Ventura M, Sanchez B, Margolles A. 2014. Intestinal dysbiosis associated with 350 systemic lupus erythematosus. MBio 5:e01548-14. 351

13. Murri M, Leiva I, Gomez-Zumaquero JM, Tinahones FJ, Cardona F, Soriguer F, Queipo-Ortuno 352 MI. 2013. Gut microbiota in children with type 1 diabetes differs from that in healthy children: a 353 case-control study. BMC Med 11:46. 354

14. Man SM, Kaakoush NO, Mitchell HM. 2011. The role of bacteria and pattern-recognition 355 receptors in Crohn's disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:152-68. 356

15. Lopez P, de Paz B, Rodriguez-Carrio J, Hevia A, Sanchez B, Margolles A, Suarez A. 2016. 357 Th17 responses and natural IgM antibodies are related to gut microbiota composition in 358 systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Sci Rep 6:24072. 359

16. Chen XQ, Yu YC, Deng HH, Sun JZ, Dai Z, Wu YW, Yang M. 2010. Plasma IL-17A is increased 360 in new-onset SLE patients and associated with disease activity. J Clin Immunol 30:221-5. 361

17. Amarilyo G, Lourenco EV, Shi FD, La Cava A. 2014. IL-17 promotes murine lupus. J Immunol 362 193:540-3. 363

18. Crispin JC, Oukka M, Bayliss G, Cohen RA, Van Beek CA, Stillman IE, Kyttaris VC, Juang YT, 364 Tsokos GC. 2008. Expanded double negative T cells in patients with systemic lupus 365 erythematosus produce IL-17 and infiltrate the kidneys. J Immunol 181:8761-6. 366

19. Doreau A, Belot A, Bastid J, Riche B, Trescol-Biemont MC, Ranchin B, Fabien N, Cochat P, 367 Pouteil-Noble C, Trolliet P, Durieu I, Tebib J, Kassai B, Ansieau S, Puisieux A, Eliaou JF, 368 Bonnefoy-Berard N. 2009. Interleukin 17 acts in synergy with B cell-activating factor to influence 369 B cell biology and the pathophysiology of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Immunol 10:778-370 85. 371

20. Crispin JC, Tsokos GC. 2010. Interleukin-17-producing T cells in lupus. Curr Opin Rheumatol 372 22:499-503. 373

21. Liao X, Ren J, Wei CH, Ross AC, Cecere TE, Jortner BS, Ahmed SA, Luo XM. 2015. 374 Paradoxical Effects of All-Trans-Retinoic Acid on Lupus-Like Disease in the MRL/lpr Mouse 375 Model. PLoS One 10:e0118176. 376

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 18: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

18

22. Edgar RC. 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat 377 Methods 10:996-8. 378

23. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, 379 Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, 380 Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, 381 Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of 382 high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature methods 7:335-336. 383

24. McDonald D, Price MN, Goodrich J, Nawrocki EP, DeSantis TZ, Probst A, Andersen GL, Knight 384 R, Hugenholtz P. 2012. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological 385 and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. The ISME journal 6:610-618. 386

25. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P, 387 Andersen GL. 2006. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench 388 compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5069-72. 389

26. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. 2007. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment 390 of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5261-7. 391

27. Lozupone C, Knight R. 2005. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial 392 communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8228-35. 393

28. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. 2011. UCHIME improves sensitivity and 394 speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194-200. 395

29. Anderson MJ. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral 396 Ecol 26:32–46. 397

30. Macanovic M, Sinicropi D, Shak S, Baughman S, Thiru S, Lachmann PJ. 1996. The treatment of 398 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in NZB/W F1 hybrid mice; studies with recombinant murine 399 DNase and with dexamethasone. Clin Exp Immunol 106:243-52. 400

31. Shi L, Zhang Z, Yu AM, Wang W, Wei Z, Akhter E, Maurer K, Costa Reis P, Song L, Petri M, 401 Sullivan KE. 2014. The SLE transcriptome exhibits evidence of chronic endotoxin exposure and 402 has widespread dysregulation of non-coding and coding RNAs. PLoS One 9:e93846. 403

32. Huang EY, Inoue T, Leone VA, Dalal S, Touw K, Wang Y, Musch MW, Theriault B, Higuchi K, 404 Donovan S, Gilbert J, Chang EB. 2015. Using corticosteroids to reshape the gut microbiome: 405 implications for inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis 21:963-72. 406

407

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 19: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

19

Figure Legends 408

Figure 1. Dynamics of gut microbiota in NZB/W F1 mice. Fecal pellets were collected at 10, 14, 18 409

weeks of age (pre-disease time points, n=5 per time point) and 23, 28, 33 weeks of age (post-disease 410

onset time points, n=3 or 4 per time point) and subjected to 16S rRNA sequencing analysis. The disease 411

onset in NZB/W F1 mice is around 20 weeks of age. (A) PCoA plot showing alteration of overall 412

community structures (P < 0.01). (B) Bacterial diversity indicated by the number of OTUs. The increase 413

of OTUs from pre-disease to post-disease onset stages was significant (P < 0.01). (C) Time-dependent 414

changes of the relative abundance of different bacterial species. Smoothing was done by ggplot2 415

package using locally weighted regression. P values were corrected for multiple comparisons by 416

controlling FDR (same in other figures). 417

418

Figure 2. Changes of gut microbiota in NZB/W F1 mice in response to immunosuppressant (Dex) 419

treatment. NZB/W F1 mice were treated with 2 mg/kg body weight Dex, intraperitoneal injection 5 per 420

week, from 20 to 34 weeks of age. Fecal pellets were collected at 34 weeks of age and subjected to 16S 421

rRNA sequencing analysis. (A) PCoA plot showing the separation of overall bacterial structure (P < 422

0.01). (B) Bacterial diversity indicated by the Shannon index (P < 0.001). (C) A bacterial species where 423

there was a significant change from pre-disease stage (pre) to post-disease onset stage (post), AND that 424

treatment of Dex significantly reversed the change (P < 0.01 in both cases). (D) Spearman correlation 425

analysis between the bacterial species identified in (C) and two measurements of SLE disease state – 426

renal function (RenalFunc) and systemic autoimmunity (SysAuto). See Materials and Methods for the 427

calculation of these two measurements. 428

429

Figure 3. Gut microbiota dysbiosis in SLE patients with active disease compared to Non-SLE controls. 430

The inclusion/exclusion criteria are shown in Materials and Methods. A fecal sample was collected from 431

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 20: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

20

each patient or control at the time of the first visit, and the samples were subjected to 16S rRNA 432

sequencing analysis. (A) PCoA plot showing no separation of overall bacterial structure (P > 0.05). (B) 433

Significant difference in bacterial diversity indicated by the Shannon index (P < 0.05). (C) No 434

significant difference in the ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (P > 0.05). (D) Significant difference in 435

the relative abundance of the phylum Proteobacteria, a representation of facultative anaerobic Gram-436

negative bacteria (P < 0.05). (E) Significant changes of several bacterial species with P values indicated 437

(nonparametric Mann-Whitney test). DESeq2 was also performed and the DESeq2 P values were 0.037, 438

0.007 and 0.007, respectively. P values were corrected for multiple comparisons by controlling FDR. 439

440

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 21: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

21

Tables 441

Table 1. Differentially represented bacterial species between SLE and Non-SLE individuals. 442

Bacterial species Strain name OTU Sequence identity SLE compared to Non-SLE

Blautia wexlerae AUH-JLD17 7 100% Increased

Blautia wexlerae AUH-JLD56 7 100% Increased

Blautia sp. Marseille P3602 7 100% Increased

Blautia sp. GD8 / 23 100% Increased

Blautia faecis M25 25 100% Increased

Blautia caecimuris SJ18 492 99% Increased

Blautia sp. AUH-JLD3 / 585 98% Increased

Blautia sp. Marseille P3387 585 98% Increased

Odoribacter laneus JCM 63 100% Decreased

Odoribacter laneus YIT 63 100% Decreased

Odoribacter laneus JCM 63 100% Decreased

Odoribacter splanchnicus / 67 100% Decreased

Alistipes onderdonkii / 13 100% Decreased

Alistipes sp. LS-J 13 100% Decreased

Alistipes sp. LS-M 13 100% Decreased

Alistipes shahii WAL 8301 164 100% Decreased

Alistipes obesi ph8 164 100% Decreased

Alistipes ihumii AP11 188 100% Decreased

Alistipes sp. cv1 / 188/210 100% Decreased

Alistipes indistinctus JCM 188/252 100% Decreased

Alistipes indistinctus YIT 188/252 100% Decreased

Alistipes sp. S216 / 252 100% Decreased

Alistipes finegoldii DSM 17242 398 99% Decreased

Alistipes finegoldii JCM 16770 398 99% Decreased

Alistipes finegoldii CIP 107999 398 99% Decreased

Alistipes finegoldii AHN 2437 398 99% Decreased

443

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 22: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

22

Table 2. Demographic, immunological, and clinical features of SLE patients. 444

Subject

No.

Age

(yrs)

Sex Race Immunological and clinical

features

SLEDAI

Score

BMI Medication

01

39 F AA ANA/dsDNA/C3/C4/heam

CL/PS

0 36.6 HCQ/Belimumab

02 21 F Caucasian

ANA/dsDNA/sm/C3/C4/heam

LN/PS/Alopecia/Neuro

8 36.4 HCQ/MMF/

Belimumab

03 40 F Caucasian

ANA/C3/C4/heam

Alopecia/SE

3 21.5 HCQ/MMF/

Belimumab

04 64 F AA ANA/C3/C4

Alopecia/MR/PS

6

31.4 HCQ/MMF/

Belimumab

05 65 F Caucasian ANA/dsDNA/C3/C4

LN

13 26.2 HCQ/MMF

06 41 M Caucasian ANA/dsDNA/C3

IA/PS/LN

2 43.5 MTX

07 27 M AA ANA/dsDNA/sm/ACL/C3/C4

LN/MR

6 31.6 HCQ/MMF

09 56 F Caucasian ANA/dsDNA/heam

PS

1 36.5 HCQ/MMF/

Belimumab

10 25 F Caucasian ANA/dsDNA/ACL/B2G/C3/C4

LN/MR/PS

8 39.1 HCQ/MMF/Rituxan

11 73 F Caucasian ANA/sm

SE

0 18.4 HCQ/MMF

17 23 M Caucasian ANA/dsDNA/heam

LN

2 21.0 PLQ/AZA

19 36 M Caucasian ANA/dsDNA/sm/C4/heam

MR/SE

0 37.2 HCQ/MMF

20 29 F AA ANA/dsDNA/sm/C3/C4

MR/IA

2 33.9 HCQ

23 66 F Caucasian ANA/dsDNA/heam

None

0 33.2 HCQ/AZA/Tacro

445

AA, African American (not Caribbean); Caucasian, Non-Hispanic; BMI, body mass index. 446

Immunological features: antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-Smith antibody (sm), anti-dsDNA antibody 447

(dsDNA), Anti-cardiolipin antibody (ACL), 2 glycoprotein (B2G), lupus anticoagulant (LAC), 448

hematologic manifestation (heam), Complement C3 (C3), Complement C4 (C4). 449

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 23: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

23

Clinical symptoms: inflammatory arthritis (IA), malar trash (MR), serositis (SE), lupus nephritis (LN), 450

cutaneous lupus (CL), photo-sensitivity (PS), neuro-lupus (Neuro). 451

Medications: Hydroxycholoquine (HCQ), Tacrolimus (Tacro), Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), 452

Methotrexate (MTX), Azathioprine (AZA), Plaquenil (PLQ). 453

454

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 24: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 25: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 26: Gut microbiota in human SLE and a mouse model of lupus · 3 46 Importance 47 Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cure. Dysbiosis 48 of

on March 13, 2020 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from