Geophysical SurveysOn

Rennie 1-78 Group

Rennie Township Ontario

Location and Access————————————————————————— 42B05NW0086 0017A1 RENNIE 010

This group of 4 unsurveyed claims is in the southwest quarter of Rennie Township, Ontario. The southeast corner of the property is on the northwest shore of Rennie Lake.

Close to the south shore of the lake, there is an all weather mine roac which may be followed to the south and west for some 8 miles to the village of Missanabie.

Claims and Numbers

The.".e are: -

S.S.M. 522203 to S.S.M. 522206 and comprise some 160 acres.

Linecutting

Picket lines 400' apart with station intervals of 100' were cut and chained.

Some 4.1 miles of this work was done by McClemens Geo physics Limited, Contractors of Noranda Quebec in the period Oct ober 20, to 23, 1978.

* * * * f 6

;vV. ' .V."-"' ~ 2 - - '

MeSPetic Survey

Assessment Data

The instrument used was a McPhar M700 Fluxgate magnetometer. Readings were taken at all of the 100* line stations and at a number of intermediate 50' ones as well. The usual diurnal and datum adjustments were made and the corrected results were plotted and then contoured.

Some 295 (base, sub-base and line) stations were re*d in the period October 24, to 28, 1978 by McClemens Geophysics.

2. Magnetic Results

Geological mapping shows that most of the property is underlain by amphibolite. There is, however, an -amphibolite-granite contact on the east side of the grid close to the Tie Line.

The narrow lenticular northerly trending closures on

the western side of the grid are caused by random disper sions of magnetic minerals rather than having a formational origion.

H.E.M. Survey

1. Assessment Data

The instrument used was a Geonics EM17 Horizontal Loop unit. The coil separation was 300' and the coil configuration was horizontal co-planar. The frequency was 1600 Hz.

•XJFV: ' Ir-

m- -;K' personnel.

Some 170 phase and out of phase readings were taken concurrently with the magnetic work by McClemen's

H,E.M. Kes'ults

One conductor was located. It has fair conductivity, is narrow and is not deeply covered. It is remarkably coincident with a topographic depression found in the course of the geological survey.

Conclusion

The conductor can be the expression of a weakly mineralized shear or fault zone. In view of the prox imity of the Renabie mine this feature may have economic possibilities. These can be checked by a reasonably short packcack drill hole collared on bed rock at 1400 E on Line 4N.

Respectfully submitted,

John W. Britton, M.A., P. Eng.

Toronto, Ontario Oct. 19, 1979

*fi-

42B05NW0086 0017A1 RENNIE 020

Geophysical SurveysOn

Rennie 2-78 Group

Rennie Township Ontario

' *S" T- ?•i-Location and Access

*-

This group of 4 unsurveyed claims is on the southeast shore of Rennie Lake, in the southeast quarter of Rennie Township, Ontario

An all weather road passes close to the south shore of the lake. This may be followed for some 8 miles to the southwest to the town of Missanabie.

Claims and Numbers

These are: -

S. S. M. 522 207 to S. S. M. 522 210 and comprise same 160 acres.

Line cut t ing

Picket lines 400' apart with station intervals of 100 1 were cut and chained.

Some 5.1 miles of this work was done by McClemens Geo physics Limited, Contractors of Noranda Quebec in the period Oct. 29, to 31, 1978.

Magnetic Survey

l . Assessment Data

The instrument used was a McPhar M700 Fluxgate magnetometer. Readings were taken at all of the 100' stations and a considerable number of intermediate 50' ones as well. The usual diurnal and datum adjustments were made and the corrected results were plotted and then contoured.

.Some 375 (base, sub-base and line) stations were

read in the period Nov. l to 5, 1978 by McClemens Geo physics.

Magnetic Results

Geological mapping has shown the property to be mostly underlain by rhyolite. On the lake side of the grid there is a rhyolite-granite contact and in the north west corner a rhyolite- amphibolite contact.

A number of lenticular magnetic closures were found. Two of these are associated with conductors. These are:

1. a sinuous closure extending from 1400 W on Line 16S to 12W on Line 12N.

2. an intermittent closure extending from 2000 W on Line 12S to 2200 W on Line O.

H, E. M. Survey

1. Assessment Data

The instrument used was a Geonics EM17 Horizontal Loop unit. The coil configuration was horizontal co-planar and the spacing 300'. The frequency was 1600 Hz.

Some 214 phase and quadrature readings were taken by McClemen's personnel concurrently with the magnetic work.

- 3 -

H.E.M. Results

Two conductors were located. These are:

1. This is coincident with magnetic feature No. l above. The best conductivity is on Line 45. There is also some suggestion of width.

2. This conductor is intermittent and does not have the close magnetic association as No. 1. It is however not well defined because the grid was not carried far enough to the west and south.

Conclusion

Conductor No. l may be tested with a packsack hole collared at 1450 W on Line 4 S

The grid should be extended to the west on all lines in order to determine the western edges of some of the anomalies on conductor No. 2.

Ground should be acquired to the southwest to permit coverage of t.ie possible extensions of both conductors.

Respectfully submitted,

John W. Britton, M.A./ P. Eng.

Toronto Ontario Oct. 19, 1979

42B05NW0086 0017A1 RENNIE 900

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

FUc.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survcy(s) Geophysical (Electromagnetic tt Magnetic)

Township or Area Rennie ___ - -——————————--———LimitedClaim Holdcr(s)Noranda Exploration Company ,

Box fr^j, Commerce Court West, Toronto, Onterio Survey Company McCleroens Geophysics Limited ,,^——,-^—^- Author of Report J. W. Britton. M. A. P.Eng. __________Address of Author Box 1203. Timmins, Ontario ———.^— Covering Dates of Snrvry Oct. 20-28. 1978

(Unecuttinf lo office)

Total Miles of Line Cut. 14.1

SPECIAL PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical — Electromagnetic-—Magnetometer-R^Hiomrlrir

-Ofhrr

Geological,

Groi hcmiral ,

DAYS prr diim

20liO

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special proviiinn credits do not apply to urborne lurveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric

Oct. 22/79

(enter dayt per clajm)

SIGNATURE:.of Report or Agent

Res. Geol.. Qualificationsl ^ f^ o

"K O A.

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

SSM"(pVe'fiK)'

SSM

522203.....(number)

522201*

SSM,

SSM 522206

TOTAL CLAIMS—L

lteI&-.:.'

-V GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations. Station interval —— Profile scale ———— Contour interval—.

295

100'

.Number of Readings Mag -295 EM - 170

.Line sparing nOO____________________

1" = 20?

200 gammas

c

Instrument McPhar M-TOO Fluxgate MagnetometerAccuracy - Scale constant 20 gammas per scale divisionDiurnal correction mt-ihod closed loops of less than l hour duration and progressive factoring

Base Station check-in interval (hour*) 6 hours or less———————.-———————..———..——.,———Base Station location and value Line 00 baseline 00 east vest 600 gamnas

D

ZO

t3w w

Instrument Geonics EM-17

Per scale division

Coil configuration Horizontal Loop

Coil separation ^^,2'

Accuracy _____iMethod: CD Fixed transmitterFrequency____JtOffiLJifc-i^-.^ ^..—.———————————— ————————————————————————————————

(specify V.L.F. nation)

Parameters measured In-phase and out-of-phase components J?f secondary electromagnetic field

Q Shoot back l In line Q Parallel line

Instrument

Scilc constant ....—^

Q)rrcctions made..

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy_——_—._

H <

Oo.

U D O Z

in

Instrument _—————————

Method D Time Domain

Parameters - On lime .———..

- Off lime ____.

- Delay time ___.

Electrode array —

Electrode spacing .

Type of electrode

— Integration time -————.

CU Frc(|iiency DomainFrequency.

Range ___

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survcy(s) Geophysical (Electromagnetic fc Magnetic)

Township or Area Rennie—.————.————-———-——-—-^—Claim Hnldcrfcyoranda Exploration Company, Limited————

Box 143. Commerce Court West, Toronto, Ontario Survey Company McClemens Geophysics Limited_________Author of Report J.W. Britton, M.A. P.Eng.__________Address o f Author Box 1205, Timmins, Ontario————————

Covering Dates of Survey Oct. 29 - Nov. 5. 1976__________(linecvjttini to office)

Total Miles of Line Cut. 5 -1_____________________

SPECIAL PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

-Electromagnetic

-Magnetometer— Rndiomrtrir.

-OtherGrolopira!

Grorhrmira!

DAYS per claim

20

140

AIRBORNE CREDITS (SpeciaJ provision crcdili do no! apply lo airborne jurveyi)

(enter dayi per claim)Magnetometer————Electromagnetic

pATp,Oct. 22/79

. Radiometric

Author of Rcporl or Agent

Res. Geo!.. ____ Qualifications

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

SSM•••"ipSSM

SSM

SSM

522207(number)

522208

522209j/ i) f* t f t f f * t m * * * * ** Al* " ̂ * * *****

522210

S—e*-**"••••••t—'/vr—'H" o M - IB ;) r.

TOTAL CLAIMS-

v i i GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL IM l AIP- - : ':;'",.fi\. k GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of surveyf*fev' '

4r"': Number of Stations —215-j ̂ Station in tcrval _ l00 '

'f Profile scale .——.

Number of Readings Mag -375 EM

Line spacing ^00*———————1=20?

Contour interval 200 gammas

Instrument McPhar M-700 Fluxgate MagnetometerAccuracy - Scale constant 20 gammas per scale divisionDiurnal correction method closed loops of less than l hour duration and progressive factoring

Base Station check-in interval (ho..r.) 6 hours or less__________________________________ Base Station location and value Line 00+00 Baseline 900 gammas

O

S lSOtt

Instrument Geonics EM-17Coil configuration Horizontal Loop_____

Coil separation 300 ,,————————————Accuracy __2j per scale division____..

Method: Q Fixed transmitterFrequency__leOQJiz J—^——————.———————————— ————,———————————————————————————

1 (ipccUy V.1..F. station)

Parameters measured in-phase and ontrpfrphasQ Qprnponents of secondary electromagnetic field

C Shoot bac ; B In line D Parallel line

InstrumentScale constant ____.—-...

Corrections made__...........

^ Base station value and location

Elevation accuracv^..

2;

UJa

Instrument _____—._ —

Method D Time Domain

Parameters - On time .__..- Off tinu- _..- -

- Delay time —M..

- Integration

D Frequency Domain

._ Frequency__.____.

__ Range .____________

Po\s cr.Electrode array —

Electrode spacing Type of electrode

limited

89Wilton Ave.P.O. Bo* I205.T lmmln*.Ont

September 19, 1972.

lv?."

Mr. Roy Rupert, Resident Geologist,Ministry of Natural Resources,Mines Division,370 Lake Street,Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.

Dear Roy:

The area flown by Noranda around Renabie included all of Rennie and Meath Townships, plus the north 1*5 miles of Stover and Township 46.

We might be willing to enter into a partnership with some other company if they want the airborne results and the results of our ground follow-up work.

Regards,

EAG/md E. A. Gallo

J

SCALE : 1 INCH - 40 CHAINS9 Httiooo loop______4000______tooo

rillUt1*11 l

5 100 404 tCC iOO I*M(29 M.

ACRES HECTARES

JtfV*-

zRENNIE

SUDBURY

MINING DIVISION

SAULT STE. MARIE

5M

Ministry of Natural Resources

Ontario Surveys and Mapping Branch

no. 21, t yr* i __wihrtncy DlocK |\ A If] f CL ons P.lrk, Toronlo ] | y J ( J \J J \J

•SM

2M.

^~

CO0} sCL h-

oCO Lti UJ

*^mo*.•1*tfO*'

tf'i'JJ'r'-Vr-'H'i'. T.''

te, *

- r-

POJ

m^/i-

t-^if^

fi^f!'-^

'^

^"^^i

/Qu)

SO

O

UJ Oe* uJ

42B05NWC0BB 8017A1 RENNIE

16 N

12 N

8N

4N

OO

85

125

Lok e

LEGEND

INSTRUMENT: Geonics EM- 17 ( I6OO Hi.)

READINGS: In percentage

IN-Phase: Plott9d dess to the fine

Out of Phase: " remote from the tine

Profile Scale; l "- 2Q*}o ; { plus to teff, minus to right)

In'Phase : Solid Line ; Out of Phase, 'Joshed

Defined Conductor Axis

Interred Ccndjcfor Axis

Are a of Conduct't'sit/

No of Readings: 170 let-Phase; I7O Ovt of Phase

Dates of Survey

Coif Separation : 300 '

200

I6N

I2N

8N

4N

OO

- 4S

85

f

' f

', ,, ^.y ^ '

'55*

S***X

SS V

we*

S5/W

32ZSM

K l

k. J

12S

Ren

flan

rt--.i'A- .V . T d A K f

LOCATION PLAN

RENNIE 1-78Sea le '"' 264O '

LEGEND

INSTRUMENT: Me Phar fluxgate

Directly in gammas

Isomagnetic Contours *v - ~

Magnet, c Bast Station A

Contoured at - ^OO gammes

Me. of readings 263

Dates of Survey

Lake REVISED

NTS.DWG. N2

Mag. and H E.M SurveysRENNIE l- 78

Twp Of) f on o

PROJECTSURVEYED BY:.

DPAWN BYDATE SCALE

NORANDA EXPLORATION CO LTDOFFICE:.

it

4aB85NWa0B6 30I7A1 RENNIE

V

!0

LEGEND

Phase

of f'h

Geontcs EM-/7 ( I6OO H2 '

in percentage

Plotted c'ose tuth#],'i8

' remote fro f): fh9 ^-19

i"- t'0% , f p! ''J f f(J lett, mnui fc right )

iid i,ii9 : J? ot f'i,o r t;, '.'-3 s had

,0

v

O,0 ('V fftvo,ngr- 214

of ^.i ' .'i.'.-

Coil

na't, 2/4

30O

,0

V

,0

O

REVISED

M T" S. ^--- - .- - '

-r*-

LOCATION PL AN

RENNIE 2-78

LEGEND

i, rHUMFhT; Me Phor f ,uxQC*e -V- 700

9 Z'-i Q i 'VV"' :-. f'iref.?ty in

/3(anaqnet,t Contours

20G gammas

353

Mag. and H.E.M SurveysRENNIE 2-78

i"1 '. t -ir ' o

f.^OoECT" ' A r P-u ' ^A i k.

NORANDA EXPLORATION COQ^'C?. Timmins, Ont.

TU-i

- 00/7-