Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
42E13SW0852 2.6216 TYROL LAKE 010
REPORT OF GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS
ON THE HILLSBOROUGH GOLD PROPERTY
LOCATED ON CROOKED GREEN CREEK
IN
PIFHER TOWNSHIP
THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION
ONTARIO
FOR
THUNDER BAY JOINT VENTURE
(GREAT WESTERN PETROLEUM CORPORATION)
(ANGLO CANADIAN MINING CORPORATION)
RECEIVED
MINING LANDS SECTION
DATE: November 30, 1983 PLACE: Vancouver, B.C.
L.K. Eccles Geologist
42E13SWG852 2.6216 TYROL LAKE
TABLE OF
INTRODUCTION
LOCATION AND ACCESS
CLAIMS
HISTORY
GEOLOGY
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS
1) Proton Precession'MagnetometerA)Theory of Operation
B)Survey Procedure
2) VLF-EM16
A)Theory of Operation
B)Survey Procedure
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
1)Proton Magnetometer Survey
2)VLF-EM16 Survey
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
SELECTED REFERENCES
QUALIFICATIONS
Page
l
1
2
3
4
4
4
45
66
6
7
7
8
8
10
11
010C
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE l - LOCATION - HILLSBOROUGH PROPERTY
FIGURE 2 - CLAIM LOCATION
FIGURE 3 - MAGNETOMETER RESULTS
FIGURE 4 - VLF-EM16 FILTERED RESULTS
Foil. p. l
Foil. p. 2
-1-
INTRODUCTION
In Fall, 1983, the Thunder Bay Joint Venture, under the
management of Great Western Petroleum Corporation, conducted
a magnetometer and VLF-EM survey over all the claims compris ing the Hillsborough Gold Prospect (Refer to Figuresllaari'd22)
Each survey utilized the same 400 feet X 100 feet (station
spacings) cut line grid, which was established in 1981 by Hillsborough Exploration Limited.
The magnetometer survey was run using a Scintrex model
MP-2, proton precession magnetometer. The VLF-EM survey, using a Geonics EM 16 was conducted using Cutler, Maine as
the base station.
Gold mineralization in veins on and adjacent to the
Hillsborough claims is known to be associated with concentra
tions of pyriihditifce -and chalcopyrite -arid it"was I'^hop&d :~thst -the
proton magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys would be effective in
defining extensions to existing vein systems and to assist
future geological mapping and prospecting.
LOCATION AND ACCESS
The Hillsborough claims are located in the central part
of Pifher Township and are completely surrounded by claims
comprising the Cowan gold prospect (also held by the Thunder
Bay Joint Venture). The claims are situated in the Thunder Bay Mining Division of Ontario and are bounded by latitudes
49 0 47' and 49" 48' and longitudes 87 0 48.5' and 87 0 50'.
The claims are within 30 km. by road from the Trans-
Canada highway, the CN railway and major hydro and natural
gas transmission lines. The nearest major population centre
is Thunder Bay, located about 200 km., by road southwest of the claims.
H/LLSBOROUGH CLAIMS
FIGURE l - LOCATION - HILLSBOROUGH CLAIMS
-2-
To access the claims by road, one travels east from
Thunder Bay along highway 11. About 20 km. east of the town
of Beardmore/highway"801 turns off to the north and is to be
followed for a distance of 22 km., crossing the bridge over
Crooked Green Creek. Less than a kilometre north of the
Crooked Green Creek bridge, a dirt road leads to the south and onto the property. All roads can be utilized by two
wheel drive vehicle from mid May through November, however, during winter months, secondary roads are not graded and
travel is limited depending on the snow conditions.
CLAIMS"f" f.
i Geophysical work was performed on all the claims listed
l below:
f No. oft; Claim Nos. Claims Expiry Date ______ Owner and Address _____
. tt TB 602243-245 3 May 25, 1984 (Hillsborough Exploration Limited)
mr, -irfoAi -i r~~~~ Pearl StreetTB 34902 1 Lease Toronto, OntarioTB 34905 l Lease "
f TB 34908 l Lease
The recorded owner of the 3 claims and 3 leases listed
above and shown on Figure 2 is Hillsborough Exploration Limited.
The property is under otpion to the Thunder Bay Joint Venture consisting of a 50-50 interest between Great Western Petroleum Corporation (Suite 718-744 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C.,
V6C 1A5) and Anglo Canadian Mining Corporation (Suite 713-744
West Hastings street, Vancouver, B.C., V6C 1A5) . Great Western
is currently managing the Joint Venture and work requirements
on the claims.
PIF
HE
R
TO
WN
SH
IP
EL
MH
IRS
T
TO
WN
SH
IP
-3-
HISTORY
A greenstone belt of Archean aged volcanic and sedimentary rocks between Beardmore and Geraldton had produced approximate ly 4 million ounces of gold from 18 mines in the area between 1934 and 1970. "The Beardmore-Geraldton gold camp rates among the top five gold camps in the Canadian Shield ..." (Mason and Mcconnell, 1983).
The Hillsboxough claims situate at the northern boundary of the Beardmore-Geraldton volcanic greenstone belt were or iginally part of a large block of claims which surrounded -,:. 2 jknowri high grade gold veins. The original mineralized vein discovery, now called the No.l vein is located a hundred feet north of the northern boundary of the Hillsborough ground and was discovered in 1946.
Work done on and around the claims' area since 1946 was undertaken by at least 5 different interest*.
The No.l vein has been subjected to the most rigorous work, including diamond drilling, stripping and trenching and
in 1966, sinking a 40 feet inclined shaft. In 1972, Algoma Development Co. undertook small open-cut mining and milling
operation on the No.l vein. In 1981, the company, renamed Northern Concentrators Ltd., constructed a 25 ton per day mill
at Thunder Bay. Mine production from the No.l vein between 1980 and 1982 is reported to be 915 tons.
Hillsborough Exploration Ltd., staked the 3 mineral claims
described in this report in 1980. In 1981, the company stripped, trenched and channel sampled the area known as the No.4 zone
{on Mining Lease No. TB 34902). The company also had a grid
cut over the entire property, geological mapping and rodk.-vs.euhp]> i-ng
-4-
In the fall of 1983, the Thunder Bay Joint Venture, under the management of Great Western Petroleum Corporation, con
ducted a magnetometer and VLF-EM survey on the Hillsborough claims.
GEOLOGY
The Beardmore-Geraldton area is underlain by Archean aged metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks of the eastern Wabigoon
volcanic belt, a linear subdivision of the Superior structural
province of the Canadian Shield, (Goodwin, 1970). A thick homogeneous sequence of Quetico ̂ beltTmetasedimentary rocks .is
in contact with the south boundary of the Wabigoon belt and
both belts are flanked on the north and south by later grani tic rocks.
The Hillsborough claims lie close to the northern boundary of the eastern Wabigoon volcanic belt and are underlain domi- nently by felsic to mafic volcanics and feldspar porphyry.
Blue/grey quartz veins mineralized with visible gold chal copyrite and pyrrhotite are found on and adjacent to the pro
perty and are usually closely associated with fault shears in
feldspar porphyry or subparallel bedding in rhyolitic tuffs.
The rocks on the property trend northwesterly and dip mo derately northwards.
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS
1) Proton Precession Magnetometer - A)Theory of Operation
**. ^..,.- . M
The proton magnetometer is so named because .it' utilises the precession of spinning protons or nuclei of the hydrogen atom
in a sample of hydrocarbon fluid to measure the total magnetic
-5-
intensity. The spinning protons in a sample of kerosene be have as small, spinning magnetic dipoles. These 'magnets'
are temporarily polarized by the application of a uniform
magnetic field generated by a current in a coil of wire.
When the current is removed, the spin of the proton causes
them to precess about the direction of the earth's magnetic
field. The processing protons then generate a small signal
whoe frequency is precisely proportional to the total mag
netic field intensity and independent of the orientation of
the coil sensor. The proportionality which relates frequency
to field intensity is the gyromagnetic ratio of the proton.
The precession frequency, typically 2000 HZ, is measured with
an accuracy of l gamma in the earth's field of approximately
50,000 gammas.
Theatbtal magnetic intensity, as measured by the proton
magnetometer is the magnitude of the earth's field vector
independent of its direction. The measurement can be express ed as a length (50,000 garammas) of the earth's field vector.
A local disturbance, say 50 gammas, would add (or subtract)
to the undisturbed field of 50,000 gammmas in the usual manner
of vector addition. Since the proton magnetometer measures
only the magnitude of the resultant vector, that which is mea
sured is very nearly the component of the disturbance vector
in the direction of the original undisturbed total field in
tensity is called the anomally.
B) Survey Procedure
The proton magnetometer data was collected at M 00''foot? sta tions along lines 400 feet apart using a Scintrex MP-2 Proton Magnetometer.
The field data were then referred to the readings at a base station (made at a selected constant time interval). The
purpose of base station recordings was to correct for any major
fluxations in the magnetic field as the survey took place.
*-Data are plotted on a map scale of l" - 200 feet and con
toured at 100 gamma intervals.
2) VLF-EM16 A) Theory of Operation (From Geonics VLF-EM16 i Operating Manual, Jan. 1983
Page 3)f
"Thie VLF - transmitting stations for communi-j cations with submarines have a vertical antenna. \ The antenna current is thus vertical, creating a
concentric horizontal magnetic field around them. When these magnetic fields meet conductive bodies in the ground, there will be secondary fields ra diating from these bodies. The EM16 measures the vertical components of these secondary fields.
l The EM16 is a sensitive receiver covering thel frequency band of the VLF - transmitting stations; with means of measuring the vertical field compo-i nents.
; The receiver has two inputs, with two receiv- ; ing coils built into the instrument. One coil
has normally vertical axis and the other is hori zontal.
l The signal from one of the coildd (^vertical f axis) if first minimized by tilting the instru-
\'-{ ment. The tilt-angle is calibrated in percentage. ••} The remaining signal in this coil is fin.ally bal
anced out by a measured percentage of a signalj from the other coil, after being shifted by 90 0 .i* This coil is normally parallel to the primaryl field.t . :l Thus, if the secondary signals are small com- f pared to the primary horizontal field, the mechan- I ical tilt-angle is an accurate measure of the ver- f tical real-component, and the .compensation f/2 signal
from the horizontal coil is a measure of the quadra- !; ture vertical signal..Jlr
i"' '
r2) VLF-EM16 ~ Field Procedure
"S!
For the purpose of this survey, VLF - transmitting station,
Cutler, Maine, was used. Survey lines were run in a north/
south direction. Readings were taken at 100 foot intervals
:;
-7-
along lines spaced 400 feet apart. A total of 168 readings
were made over ~3 miles of cut line grid. All readings were
made with the operator facing north.
At each station, first the operator orients the instru
ment at right angles to the line pointing towards the direc
tion of Cutler, Maine. The instrument is then swung up and down for a minimum sound intensity in the speaker. The qua
drature dial is adjusted to further minimize sound. After
the minimum signal strength is found on both adjustments the inclimometer reading is recorded as well as the quadrature.
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
Results of the two surveys are shown in Figures 3 and 4.
Scales of the maps are l inch = 200 feet. These 'maps form the
basis of the discussion, together with geologic detail found in earlier mapping.
1) Proton Magnetometer Survey
It was hoped that a proton magnetometer would be more
sensitive and lead to more conclusive results than those ob
tained using the fluxgate magnetometer when surveying the Cowan Gold prospect, which surrounds the Hillsborough claims.
It was found that the proton magnetometer helped to define geologic trends in the more mafic volcanic horizons on the pro perty and gave subtle indications of the presence of the No.l
-8-
and No.4 mineralized zones. However, the subtle indications
of the mineralized zones can only be deduced after already know
ing the zones exist and the magnetometer seems to be a poor
tool to use as a single prospecting method. It is useful in
determining extensions to the mineralized zones.
Generally the magnetic response was higher and more vari
able in the northern half of the grid area and ranged between
59,200 and 60,900 gammas. In the south half of the grid area
the values generally remained between 59,800 and 59,900 gammas.
The lower 'relief 1 of values in the southern portion can pro
bably be attributed to a large body of feldspar porphyry under
lying that part of the grid area. In the northern areas the
dominant rock type is andesitic to mafic fragmental tuffs inter
bedded with rhyolitic tuff horizons and thin horizons (dykes/ sills or beds) of feldspar porphyry
2) VLF-EM16 Survey
The VLF-EM results showed a similar pattern to the magneto meter survey in that the northern part of the grid had a more variable response than did the southern half. It is suspected
that the northern shore of Chellew Lake is underlain by a fault
structure as there is a distinct linear, EM-response in this area. This is the only EM response of significance in the grid
area.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Proton magnetometer is a useful tool in defining trends
in geology but is generally thought to be poor at defining the type of mineralized vein structures found on this property.
Subtle hints of some of the vein structures were observed but
-9-
only because it was known the veins were there in the first
place.
The EM-l6 survey defined a probable fault structure along
the north shore of Chellew Lake but did not define areas of
known mineralization (No.4 zone).
Diamond drilling will have to be utilized to test for ex
tensions of known mineralieed structures and to explore known
structures defined by EM and magnetometer surveys which are
suspected of carrying ore grade mineralization.
-10-
SELELCTED REFERENCES
1. Brown, P.K.; Geologists's Report, Northern Concentrators/Cowan Gold Property (Formerly Crooked Green Creek Prospect); Thunder Bay Mining Division, Pifher Township, Ontario, January 20, 1983.
2. Faser, D.C.; Contouring of VLF-EM Data;
Geophysics Vol. XXXIV, No. 6, December 1969.
3. GEONICS LIMITED Operating Manual for EM16 VLF EM
January 1979.
4. MASON, John K. and McCONNEL, Craig D.,
Gold Mineralization in the Beardmore-Geraldton Area; Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 110-Geology of Gold in Ontario, 1983.
5. Map 2102 - Tashota - Geraldton Sheet, GeologicalCompilation Series 1966, l" - 4mi.
6. Mineral Policy Sector, Department of Energy, Mines and
Resources, Ottawa
-11-
QUALIFICATIONS
I, Louise K. Eccles, of Vancouver, British Columbia, do
hereby certify that:
1. I am a practising geologist under the employ of
Great Western Petroleum Corporation, with head
office located at #718-744 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C., V6C 1A5.
2. I was graduated from the University of British Columbia with B.Se. degree, in 1976 and have practised my profession as an exploration
geologist, continuously since that time.
3. I am a fellow of the Geological Association of
Canada and a member in good standing of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
7
4. I personally conducted the magnetometer and EM16
surveys on the Hillsborough Gold prospect, des cribed in this report between August 11 and August 12, 1983.
Vancouver, British Columbia ___________ November 30, 1983 L0uise" K. Eccles
Ministry ofNaturalResources
Ontario
Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
WJ'f- ~ 42E13SW0053 2.6216 TYROL LAKE
The Mil900
Type of Survey(s) Township or Area
fane* 7V*ok^
ft- WClaim Holder(s) Prospector's Licence No.
Address
-i-Survey Company Date of Survey (from ft to)
JLitt..l^lOL-.g
Total Mile* of lin* Cut
Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)
W- H/lSTMs St. (fofCOUUfW,R.C.Credits Requested per Eacn Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here -^
*
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
C2&W*- Other
ff" I'"S
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days per Claim
aoao
Days per Claim
4 ———
Days per Claim
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total ExpendituresTotal
Days Credits
15 '
InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.
Mining ClaimPrefix
TGNumber
/
7f
Expend. Days Cr.
Mining ClaimPrefix Number
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
Certification Verifying Report of Work
Expend. Days Cr.
Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature) Date Approved as necoroea
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during end/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying
1362 (81/9)
Ontario
Ministry ofNaturalResr^rces
GeotechnicalReportApproval
File
Mining Lands Comments
To: geophysics ftl. ft
Common tt
ived [""l Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature
To: Geology - Expenditures
Comments
["] Approved |""| Wish to see again with correctionsSignature
To: Geochemistry
Comments
Approved Q Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature
f j [TO: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)
/j^jv Ministry ot Technical Assess) IVy'l Natural ... , . .^ \Z/ Resources Work CreditsOntario ,*j^
mem ""* 2.6216
"""19840327 W^3tcord7"'portof b/ 1
Recorded Holder
HILLSBOROUGH EXPLORATION LIMITEDTownship or Area
Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim
Geophysical
Pl.rtrnm.on.tlr 1 5 rim,,
15Magnetometer ~. . , , d*V*
Rnriinnutric days
nth.r rljiyi
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims AtiMted" column
Geological . -- days
Geochemical . days
Man days D Airborne O
Special provision B Ground G3
0 Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.
D Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.
Mining Claims Attested
TB 602243 602244 602245
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
LJ not sufficiently covered by the survey LJ Insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits If necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; faction 77(19) 60:
828 (83/6)
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey (s) Township or Area Claim Holder(s^
V^F -EH l (g
PlD RKTi od
Survey nnmpany ^RCAT "RETKOLEUd
Author of Report —Address of Ai.thm- #7# ' 744
g. CCLGS-
.ST*—
Covering Dates of Survey.
Total Miles of Line Cut —
//.(linecutting to office)
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical —Electromagnetic.
DAYS per claim
—Radiometric-Other——..Geological.Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit! do not apply to airborne turveyt)
Magnetometer—
DATE: 'W/ ff,
.Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)
SIGNATURE:."Author of Report or Agent
Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys
File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
.........(prefix) (number)
TOTAL CLAIMS
837 (5/79)
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations.Station interval. Profile scale ——
/OO
.Number of Readings
.Line spacing.—-—— "l 00
ONETTr
interval /^ tf /t?J
Instrument. Accuracy —
HP'2. TlQTON
oconstant — correction method —.
Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ___
Iftt5
*5B,060 /CMYtij)
/#
ROMAGNETIC
ELE
G
InstrumentCoil configurationCoil
Method:
measured.
Instrument,Scale constant.
Corrections made.
C3rixed transmitter, M flint____________
D Shoot back D In line D Parallel line
Base station value and location.
, (specify V.L.F. .tation)
J
Elevation accuracy.
ARIZATION
NDUCED
Instrument ————————— Method D Time DomainParameters — On time
- Off time- Delay
— Integration time.Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing .
: of electrode
d Frequency Domain — Frequency _____ Range_______
SELF POTENTIAL
Instrument——————————————————————————————————————— Range.Survey Method _________________________________________
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRIC
Instrument.
Values measured.Energy windows (levels)-^^-^^^—^——^-——————————^—^—.—.—.....—^— Height of instrument___________________________Background Count, Size of detector^^—^^-—--—^.———————^——^^^^^.^.^..—....^.—^^^.-.
Overburden ___________________________________________.(type, depth — include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)
Type of survey——————————————————————— Instrument ————————————————————————Accuracy^^-—————^—————————————Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS
Type of survey(s) ——— Instrument(s) —————
(specify for each type of lurvey) Accuracy^^—————————————.
(specify for each type of survey)
Aircraft used.—-—-——^^———————————-.—-—........—.—.Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————
Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth^——— Terrain————————
ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent D
p. p. m. Op. p. b. D
Cu, Pb,
Others—
Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)
Field Analysis (.
Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used——
Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. .-—--.—————
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, aihing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis————
Extraction Method. Analytical Method - Reagents Used——
Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory.— Extraction Method— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used ————
.tests)
.tests)
-tests)
General. General.
1984 05 03 Your Filet 571 Our Filet 2.6216
Mrs. Audrey HayesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6
Dear Madams
REt Notice of Intent dated March 27, 1984.Geophysical (Electromagnetic fi Magnetometer) Survey on Mining Claims TB 602243-44-45 in the Area of Tyrol Lake.
The assessment work credits as listed with the above mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.
Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.
Yours sincerely.
S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phones (416) 965-6918
M.B. Andersonsse
cct Hillsborough Explortion Ltd 166 Pearl Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 1L3
ccs Resident Geologist Thunder Bay, Ontario
ccs Mr. G.H. FergusonMining fi Lands Commissioner, Toronto, Ontario
1984 01 05 Your File: Dur File:
5712.6216
Mrs. Audrey HayesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 566
Dear Madam:
We have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims TB 602243-44-45 1n the Area of Tyrol Lake.
This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued,
Yours very truly,
J.R. MortonActing DirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-1380
A. Barr:mc
cc: Hlllsborough Exploration Limited 166 Pearl Street Toronto, Ontario M5H 1L3
cc: Great Western Petroleum Limited 718 - 744 West Hastings Street Vancouver, B.C. V6C 1A5 Attention Louise Eccles
InUiarChecl. VUiVilL flJfrttA vU4Jf
Assessed
Approved Reports of Work sent out
Notice of Intent filed
Approval after Notice of Intent sent out
Duplicate sent to Resident Geologist
Duplicate sent to A.F.R.O.
(S 1x4
t..l"l
ario
Ministry ofNaturalResources
1984 03 27 Your File: Our File:
5712.6216
Mrs. Audrey Hayes ;Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6Dear Madam:
Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.
For further information, if required, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/965-6918.
Yours very truly,
S.E. YOndt ^Bitector Land Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316
M.E. Anderson:mc Ends.
cc: Hillsborough Exploration Limited 166 Pearl Street Toronto, Ontario M5H 1L3
cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining S Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario
845
Ministry ofNaturalResources
Ontario
Notice of Intent
for Technical Reports
1984 03 27
2.6216/571
An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.
If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.
If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.
If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.
846 (82/6)
2-fe-a.it>
* /5
Em
4s"
,. . - - ,., . . . -, t.-....^ .^ , -^t'' 'J Ol,y|...;.i4lt-]l4!lj^t, ii.i^ li
Q O
o -t^o -* o5 3L ^(0 W- fc c Tl -T- ~y
s: O) Q)w WO
sUl3 -* O) a *c'
-y Z V)
5 5 - 0) (D
Q O
Q. <a
(7) 6
1 f (~ to
otfl D"
O
CP
zOHm0)
MUNGO PARK POINT G-92
STATUS REFER TQ
TP. PLAN G-162 ELMHIRST
00 O)
- oo o
moiNCO
OD^ - o
KABY LAKE G-59 (D H 00
O) Q) q-w p- 3.o ^ w c co :± O "~ "^
CD a
o3-
**z o
H^ —4 o c H ^ — 3CI
"1 MWM rf^ ——^ I - i
c - c s z s Zm ^ 2 — S n ^ -n So ^ o 2 ^ m -t .H ^ < ni w m O m30 o 30 O -DO ^ OB Zg
m
r CO: O
rr
z o
f S
z ' zz 'D z
B 3
DC/}TJ O
Ozo"H
o o zr— >Z D
z cZ F"C *-lCO
O ^ -H ~
Z X-
D S
13 -r
Ot/) ^"O ^
O
"O
m Q m zD
? iw ST 0 J6 S —* i -H "* -^ m o 2s . . l S r. * " c^
iTV
tj (.'
BASELINE
C H E L L E W
TB 34902
TB 60224^
LAKES10
TB 602244 Wining clattr number
60000
LEGEND
Magnetic depression
Magnetic contour (total field)
Magnetic contour mfered
Contour interval — 100 gammas
INSTRUMENT : SCINTREX NIP - 2 PRECEStON PROTON MAGNETOMETER
SCALE : l ' 200
4UO HOC Feet
THUNDER BAY JOINT VENTURE
HILLSBOROUGH CLAIMS
THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION , ONTARIO
MAGNETOMETER SURVEYDATE:
AUGUST , 1983
DRAWN BY
J.S
FIGURE
BASELINE
C H EL L E W
42E13SW0052 2.6216 TYROL LAKE 220
LEGEND
Creek
Lake
C la irr line
T B 602244 - Mining claim number
Contours
Contours interval - 10 Fraser filtered data
INSTRUMENT . GEONlCS VLF-EM 16
SCALE : l = 200
Feet
THUNDER BAY JOINT VENTURE
HILLSBOROUGH CLAIMS
THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION , ONTARIO
VLF-EM 16 SURVEYDATE
AUGUST , 1983
DRAWN BY. FIGURE
J.S
