Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
42E12SW0868 2.9480 SUMMERS 010
Geochemical and Geophysical
Assessment Report
regarding claims
TB839023 to 839026
TB846801
TB873427 to 873429
TB873434 REG E l VE C
TB874472 to 874480OCT l .
TB928038 to 928040
Thunder Bay Minin, Division """"6 LANDS SECTION
Northwestern Ontario
Co-ordinates
North 490 12' Latitude
West 87 0 57' Longitude
N.T.S. 42E/12
for
B. Boos
19 - 777 Burrard St.
Vancouver, B. C. V6Z 1X7
by
W. G. Hainsworth, P. Eng.
W. G. Hainsworth S Associates Ltd.
905 - 837 West Hastings St.
Vancouver, B. C. V6C 1B6 October 6, 1986
42E12SW0068 2.9480 SUMMERS 010C
TABLE OF. CONTENTS
PageIntroduction.................... .,.............................. lLocati on A Access............................................... 2Property........................................................ 2Local Geology................................................... 3Soil Survey...........,......................................... 3EM-16 VLF Survey................................................ 5Magnetometer Survey............................................. 6Recommendati ons................................................. 7
Maps
Location Map Fig. 1................................ Following Pg. 2Claim Map Fig. 2................................... Following Pg. 3
In Pocket
Fig. 3 EM-16 Profiles - West HalfFig. 4 Soil Assays (Silver) West HalfFig. 5 Soil Assays (Silver) East HalfFig. 6 Soil Assays (Gold) West HalfFig. 7 Soil Assays (Gold) East HalfFig.SA EM-16 Raw Data - West HalfFig. 9 EM-16 Profiles -East HalfFig.9A EM-16 Raw Data - East HalfFig.10 Magnetometer Plan - East HalfFig. 11 Magnetometer Plan - West Half
W. G. HAINSWORTH S ASSOCIATES LTD.Mining Consultants
SUITE 905837 WEST HASTINGS STREET
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIAV6C 1B6 (604) 687-6930
INTRODUCTION
This report covers the results of the work recently completed on the 21 noted property. Final results of soil assays have been recently received and are incorporated into the report.
Work on the claims proceeded in two stages due to a forest fire closure which lasted for some seven days. The first field operation carried from May 10th to May 27th, 1986 while the final stage lasted from June 3rd to June 10th, 1986. Surveys carried out included an EM16 and magnetometer approach and a geochemical survey of the soil collection nature. The trench clean-up was not carried out due to non-identification of trenches within the claims. During the field operation it was discovered that certain claims were smaller than originally represented. As a consequence, the field crew staked an additional three claims along the northwest boundary for the company. Surveys were carried on into these claims.
The field operations carried out the full recommendations as advanced in the writer's report of April 14, 1986. A sum well in excess of S55,000 was expended upon the operation. Recommendations as to a second phase are appended to this report.
O 20 KILOMETRES
PROPERTY
BEARDMORE RESOURCES LTD.
BEARDMORE AREA,ONTARIO
LOCATION MAPTo accompany a report by W.G. Hainsworth P.Eng.
DATE:APRIL,I986
FIG. l
LOCATION AND ACCESS
The claim group lies 6 1/2 kilometers (4 miles) north of the village of Beardmore in Summers Township, northwestern Ontario. By Highway 11, the city of Thunder Bay is 185 kilometers (115 miles) to the southwest of Beardmore. Access to the claims is by means of Highway 580 which branches from Highway 11 just north of the village. This paved highway carries on to the old Leitch Mine with a good spur road branching off northward a mile east of the minesite. This spur road which carries through to the Sturgeon River passes through the western claims of the company and parallels to the north portions of the claim block. Various bush roads lead off this road into different areas of the claims.
The Beardmore Resources claims are within the Thunder Bay Mining Division with the claims centering on north 49* 42' latitude and west 87' 57' longitude. Its National Topographic System location is 42E/12.
Property
The Beardmore Resources claim group located in the surveyed township of Summers, is within the Mining Division of Thunder Bay, northwestern Ontario.'
The property consists of 21 contiguous claims extending east-west for a length of 5,180 meters (17,000 feet) normally as a single claim width with a central expansion of either three or four claim lengths. Refer to Figure 2. In total the group occupies approximately 352 hectares (870 acres) of area.
During the course of the field operation it was found that several claims, namely TB 874472 to TB 874474, were of short dimensions. With the sanction of the company, the contractor staked 3 more claims adjoining these three to the north. Surveys were proceeded onto these claims.
Claim No. Expiry Date
TB 839023 to 839026 November 22, 1986
TB 846801 "
TB 873427 to 873429 "
TB 873434 "
TB 874472 to 874480 "
TB 928038 to 928040 May 26, 1987
LEITCH GOLD MINES LTD.
LEITCH GOLD MINES SHAFT
FALCONBRIDGE NICKEL
PORT PROPERTY 49 "3 8
MOOSEHILL
TANSLEYVILLEjT
BEARDMORE ffff
BEARDMORE RESOURCES LTD
BEARDMORE AREA .ONTARIO
CLAIM MAPSUMMERS TOWNSHIP
88*Tooccompony o report by W.G. Hainsworth PEng.
DATE: APRIL,1986
FIG. 2
Local Geology
The Beardmore Resources claims are located within an east- northeasterly trending isoclinally folded Early Precambrian metavolcanic-metasedimentary formational sequence of what has been termed the Wabigoon Subprovince. This stratigraphic sequence consists of a band of altered sediments some 3 1/4 kilometers (2 miles) in width and consisting almost entirely of greywacke bounded by a mainly femic volcanic belt on the south and a predominantly felsic volcanic zone to the north.
The Beardmore Resources claims lie within and from 1/4 to l mile of the southern contact of the north band of light coloured acid volcanics with the later Temiskaming sediments to the south. Banded iron formations lie at different horizons within the volcanics and sediments and are, in some instances, closely related to gold mineralization. The iron formation lying just south of the western claims of Beardmore Resources are extensions of those mapped and drilled on the nearby Freeport Sulphur property. The formation does penetrate into claim TB839025 and was the object of intense examination by earlier explorers. The formation has a strong consistent characteristic which shows a linear attitude as opposed to drag-folding in other iron bands. The bed averages a relatively consistant width of 18 to 24 meters (60 to 80 feet) and has been surface identified in addition to drill located.
Faulting is expressed primarily through topography, mainly by water courses and, occasionally, by scarps. The Sandy Creek fault lies a quarter mile north of the subject claims. This strike fault occurs completely within the lavas. Two other faults, the High Hill and the Standingstone Lake, lie respectively within the sediments and at the contact of these sediments with the northern volcanic band.
Soil Survey
Some 1209 soil samples were collected from the "B" horizon throughout the property. The "B" horizon varies in depth from 10 to 38 centimeters {4 to 15 inches) and is readily identified by its light reddish colour and fineness. Often it is overlain by a thin clay horizon. In the swampy areas the "B" horizon could not be reached.
The soils were dried and shipped to Hin-En Laboratories in Vancouver where they were run for gold, silver, zinc and arsenic. Some of the early shipments were run only for gold and silver. Statistical analysis was run on the precious metal values.
Soils
From the histogram the average silver value through the property was 0.4 parts per million. There were only eleven samples that exceeded this background by more than twice the value. Host of these high values are spikes and appear in the western portion of the claims.
The silver values throughout the property can be considered weak however four of them Including the highest 1.6 parts per million, are associated with the magnetometer high zone in the particular area.
Gold Soils
The average value of the gold soils throughout the claims in 4.2 parts per billion. To be anamolous vlaues should be in the 20 plus parts per billion and then should show some continuity.
There are five samples which reported 20 or better parts per billion and although a rough lateral trend can be visualized the values lack buildup and length. All the values in the anomolous condition are in the eastern portion of the claim.
Results are shown in figures 647.
Arsenic and Zinc Soils
Some 418 samples, mostly in the western section of the property, were geochemically assayed for the indicator metals arsenic and zinc.
All arsenic and zinc values are low and only the anomalous values are shown on the surface plans.
The histogram for arsenic values shows a double peak at 2 and 4 parts per million with a gradual decline on both sides.
In the arsenic group only two assays exceeded 1.0 ppm.
The histogram for zinc is rather lopsided peaking early in the 20 parts per million range then declining slowly to the higher values. The anomolous readings - those in excess of 40 parts per million - are eighteen and are generally in the low anomolous range - 50 to 65 ppm range (14).
The highest reading, 255 parts per million on line 5+00 E, 3+75N, is flanked on the north by a modest reading and shows some continuity to the west where modest readings prevail at two stations, 4+00 N and 4+25N on line 4+00 E. However, no values continue on bearing to the east or west beyond these two lines.
EM 16 VLF Survey
This survey cc vered some 32.11 kilometers of the original staked area and was continued for antoher 6.06 kilometers into the newly staked claims.
The model used was a Geonics Ronka Unit 171. Readings were taken and recorded every 20 meters along the grid lines which were spaced at 100 meter separations in the western portion of the claims and 90 meter separations in the eastern half of the claim block.
The station selected was the Seattle Washington station on a frequency of 23.8 KHz. The operator faced north when making the readings. The quadrature was utilized to dampen the null and was addtionally recorded along with the dip angle reading.
There are nine conductive zones within the claim groups none of which are exceptionally strong except for conductor I and portions of conducter G.
In the eastern portion of the claim four conductors A, B, C and D with its connection eastward to C are associated with wet swamp conditins and generally point the trend of these swamps.
Conductor A, while originating in a swamp under lain by a magnetic negative, trends southwest towards the higher magnetic readings but fails to lack continuity.
Conductor B is a thinly disguised swamp carrier.
Conductor C, while originating in a swamp, carries westward and flanks one of the highest magnetometer reading in the eastern section. Its continuation on towards conductor O, while weakly identified, is surface identified by marshy conditions as is conductor D.
There appears to be no conductors other than for "C" that are worthy of further work in this eastern section.
The western half of the claims has identified 5 conductors, E, P, G, H and I.
Conductor E trends slightly south of west through the center of a magnetic anomoly low identified in two adjoining lines. It loses some semblance of conduction before showing strong traits from line 22-1-00 east. Undercutting a small marsh it again (conductor F) continues west southwest identifying itself with two thin elongated magnetic low bands which appear to flank (conductor G) the strong magnetic body which lies under the lake and to the west.
Conductor H connects a magnetic low to a magnetic high on adjoining lines but rapidly dies out in both directions.
Conductor I showing sharp but brief crossovers is likely an underground egress for the swamp body.
The conductors in this position of the property are interesting from their direct association with the magnetics. They could be strong shear zones or contact areas and should be further investigated. Refer to figures 8 and 9.
Magnetometer Survey
This survey was carried out with a Scintrix MP 2 portable proton precession Magnetometer over the same 32.11 kilometers of line as the soil and EM-16 surveys. Readings were taken every 20 meters. The accuracy of the readings - a direct readout - was 5 gammas. Diurnal corrections were applied to all readings based on the variation between the start and end of the daily operation. There were some 1829 readings taken as recorded.
In the eastern half of the property the readings illustraate a flat plateau with little variations other than for narrow spotty highs and lows of little continuity. The highest magnetic reading in this half of the property is recorded on line 38+80 E (2003 gammas) extending eastward for another line and having its dipole counterpart, a magnetic low of -1249 gammas, several lines to the west. Conductor "C" is closely associated with this magnetic high.
In the southeastern section of these claims, high magnetic readings trending slightly north of east appear with a strong thin core of highs being flanked by moderately high but decreasing readings. It is possible that this could be a mafic volcanic band intruding into the more felsic units.
The western half of the property shows the most intersting development.
An extremely high magnetic section is apparent from line 3+00 east to line 13+00 east. The magnetism is strong enough to have thrown compasses off line as illustrated by lines 7+00 east, 8+00 east and 9+00 east. Several individual readings are extremely high. The high section is flanked on the south and the northwest by magnetic lows. Iron formations are known to exist in this area from exploration in the '30s and it was these type of formations with their accompanying gold values that were responsible for the Leitch Gold Mines production.
Soils both for gold and silver, show very little response in this particular area. However, the extent of the magnetic structure makes it an important aspect of the property and one which requires further work. Refer to figures 10 and 11.
Recommendations
From the geochemical soil sampling survey the property showed scattered results with some areas requiring further investigation. The EM-16 VLF survey exposed several conductors of interest in addition to those of common surface phenomena and again, further investigation to substantiate these conductors is advised. The magnetometer survey exposed a large area of significant counts which could be due to an interbedded mafic volcanic or a large band of iron formation. THis particular area warrants further attention.
What appeared to be badly sloughed-in trenches were noted in several areas but it was impossible to clean up during this phase.
It is recommended that on the basis of the extremely high magnetic values bounded by several EM conductors in the western portion of the property that Beardmore Resources Ltd. move into Phase II.
The writer's original recommendation called for a Phase II that contained detailed soil and/or EM surveys plus bulldozer trenching with the accompanying requirements. The cost estimate was $41,500.
The writer, on the basis of the results of the geochemical and geophysical surveys, recommends that this phase be split with the bulldozer stripping and trenching, particularly in the high magnetics zone, being the initial portion of the phase II, the "A" portion, while the detailed soil and/or EM 16 survey plus assays be the later program, that is the "B" portion.
It is recommended that a series of trenches be laid down from line 4+00 E through to line 14+00 E, which trenches take into account the high and low magnetics plus the electromagnetic conductor. Upon rock exposure, samples should be taken along the rock-overburden interface for gold - silver assaying.
Should results prove interesting the company should prepare for a Phase III, that of diamond drilling. A recommendation concerning this approach would be more appropriate on the completion of the two sections of Phase II.
The modified program and cost estimate for the Phase li program:
Part ABulldozer trenching S 15,000 Supervision, sampling, assaying 4,000 Travel, billeting 3.500
22,500
-8-
Part B
Detailed soil and/or EM 16 survey plus assays 10,000Rentals, travel, billotting 3,500Supervision, report 5,500
19,000
Total A and B 41,500
Contingency 10% 4,500
46,000
On the basis of encouraging results emanating from the Phase II program, an estimate of expenditures for the Phase III operation would be approximately $90,000 based on 2,500 feet of BQ exploration drilling at an overall cost of $35 to $36 per foot.
Respectfully submitted,
v- p'f5 . EnV;
W- G. HAlNsiyoRTH
CERTIFICATE
I, W.G. Hainsworth, P.Eng., of Vancouver, B.C. do hereby certify:
(1) That I am a Consulting Geologist residing at 836 - 13th Avenue, Vancouver, B.C.
(2) That I am a graduate of the University of WesternOntario, London, Ontario, Bachelor of Science Degree, Honours Geology.
(3) That I have practiced my profession for some 30 years.
(4) That I have been a continuous member of the Association of Professional Engineers of British Columbia since 1965 and am a Professional Geologist registered with the Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta since 1979.
(5) That I have no financial interest, direct or indirect, in Beardmore Resources Ltd. and do not expect to obtain any such interest.
(6) That the information contained in this report is based on a visit to the Beardmore 21 claim property on May 6/86 and perusal of all pertinent information available.
(7) That consent is herewith given to Beardmore Resources Limited to use any or all material from this report in information circulars, offerings or share holders' brochures, provided no attempt is made to misrepresent the stated facts of the report.
To Accompany:
Assessmenr Reportof
October 6,1986on
Beardmore Claims
M-nistryot Report of WorkNatural .--i. , r- , , resources (Geoohys/ca), Geological.
Geochemical and Expenditures)
42E12SWe068 2.9480 SUMMERS 900
Sue vey Co m pan
r-.4.ana Address of Author iof Geo-Technical
Data of Survey (from Si to) Total MiJet of (in* Cut
- /
Credits Peauestea oer Each Claim m Columns at nqhtDays per Claim
f 'irst survey.
Enter 40 days. (This nc'udes line cutting)
For sacn additional survey, using tie same grid:
E-ter 20 days Kor each)
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic ^T^/*'
- Magnetometer ^ /f*
Radiometric
Other
Geological
Geochemical
or-iref; n'vt?rsir i;iOe
,inc: -'"ter 'otails) Mere
oeoonysicai
Electromagnfit'C
. Maqn*jIOrr*eter
Racliometr c
Other
Geological
Days oer Claim
Days :;erClaim
Note. jO'T .
J X ^liq
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim
Prefix i Number
S
? 7VV72
y? W77x
Exoeno*. Days Cr.
-rv y
Mining ClaimPrefix Number
Expend. Days Cr.
' otrti r'.j * Ti P o r ^^ 'Ti i n i P Q iK'ir, .^overen '.'Y This ^CO r * 0^ -AQf *v .
i 7^N/
* s
/JfL* X. 3L
" , .''t *or*h n :n" R^fo^
pur: s trm.1
i f
December 31, 1986 Your File: 305 Our File: 2.9480
Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and Mines435 James Street SouthP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6
Dear Madam:
RE; Notice of Intent dated December 3, 1986Geophysical (Electromagnetic, Magnetometer) Geochemical Surveys and Overburden Drilling and Assaying on Mining Claims TB 839023, et al, 1n Summers Township
The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.
Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.
Yours sincerely,
J.C. Smith, Supervisor Mining Lands Section
Whitney Block, 6th Floor Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3
Telephone: (416) 965-4888
SH/mccc: Ben 3oos
Will iam Kent Akhurst#19 - 777 Burrard StreetVancouver, B.C.V6Z 1X7Resident Geologist Thunder Say, Ontario
Encl.
M.G. Hanisworth S Associates LtdSuite 905337 West Hastings StreetVancouver, B.C.V6C 1B6
Mr. G.H. FergusonMining 4 Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Developmenta f4 Mines
Ontario
Technical Assessment Work Credits
Date
ecember 3,1986
File
2.9480Mining Recorder's Report of Wor^o. 3Q5
Recorded Holder
BEN BOOS - WILLIAM KENT AKHURST iTownship or Area
SUMMERS TOWNSHIP
Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim
Geophysical
Magnetometer riays
Radinmptrir Hays
Other riays
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Cairns Assessed" column
Geological days
Genrhfimir.al 16 days
Man days [ | Airborne l l
Special provision ft~| Ground fX|
[X] Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.
| _ : Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.
Mining Claims Assessed
TB 839023 to 026 inclusive 846801 873427 to 429 inclusive 873434 874472 to 480 inclusive 928038 to 040 inclusive
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
l l not sufficiently covered by :ne survey l j insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce tne .move credits if necessary m order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as fo:'cn\s: Geophysical - 80; Gi^oloqocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.
828 (85/12)
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Technical Assessment Work Credits
OntarioDm
December 3, 1986
Fll*
2.9480Mining Recorder'1 Reoort of Work No.
305
Recorded Holder
BEN BOOS- WILLIAM KENT AKHURSTTownship or Area
SUMMERS TOWNSHIPType of survey and number of
Assessment days credit per claim
Geophysical
Inriiirpri pnlariyatinn riays
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column
Genlngiral rlays
Gfiocriemical days
Man days ~2 Airborne Q]
Special provision X 1 Ground )Q
1^2 Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.
| j Cieuits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.
Mining Claims Assessed
TB 839023 to 026 inclusive 873427 to 429 inclusive 873434 874472 to 480 inclusive 928038 to 040 inclusive
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
20 DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC10 DAYS MAGNETOMETER
TB 846801
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
not sufficiently covered by f~e survey l j insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the ."Dove credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not the maximum allowed as lollops: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.
828 (85/12)
Ministry olNorthern Developmentanrj Mines
Technical Assessment Work Credits
OntarioDate
December 3,lQ8fi
File
?,Mining Recorder's Work No.
9480Report of
5
Recorded Holder
RFN WHS - UTII TAM KFN AKHIIRSTTownship or Area
^UMMERS TOWNSHIPType of survey and number of
Assessment days credit per claim
Geophysical
Elnrtrnmagnetir riays
Magnfitnmfitpr riays
Other Hays
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column
Genlogir.al riays
GHOchfimiral days
Man days LJ Airborne | |
Special provision , ! Ground | |
[~1 Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.
^ l~] Credits have been reduced because of corrections
to work dates and figures of applicant.
Mining Claims Assessed
SlO,829.75 SPENT ON OVERBURDEN DRILLING AND ASSAYING SAMPLES TAKEN FROM MINING CLAIMS:
TB 839023 to 026 inclusive 846801 873427 to 429 inclusive 873434 874472 to 480 inclusive 928038 to 040 inclusive
722 DAYS CREDIT ALLOWED WHICH MAY BE GROUPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 76(6) OF THE MINING ACT R.S.O. 1980.
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
l l not sufficiently covered by the survey insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may n'ciuct' the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not
exceed the maximum .mowed .is tonoivs: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.
828 (85/12)
oy
lseQ
l
\\
\\
\\
\\
\\
\\\
s.x
l*. -..4fe -
l l l
October 9 19 86
Received '-"•m Re;u de W.G. Hainsworth St Assoc.
-—Ten thousand Eight hundred Twenty-nine--75________________________l————.——-————————————2______________Dollars
100
RE: Beardmore assaysTU;
$ 10,829.75 Horth705 W. 16th St.
Vancouver, b. CPhon*
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LArDS
SANDRA-^JWP -6-167PATENT.SURFACE S MINING RIGHTS...™
" . SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY.........." . MINING RIGHTS ONLY ___...,.
LEASE. SURFACE Si MINING RIGHTS-.-.-. . " .SURFACE R1GHTSONLY._....^.. -,. " .MINING RIGHTS ONLY...'__.......
LICENCE OF OCCUPATION .._............ORDER IN COUNCIL ...............:_.'...,RESERVATION ............,..^.......,.J...
CANCELLED __......^..-................SAND 4 GRAVEL
NOTE: MiNlMB HIGH1HI. VESTEO. IN ORIGINAL PA^tH^tt BY THE PUBLIC LANDS ACT. B .t .O 1ITO. CHAP. MD. SEC. S3. BUBSEC 1
TB ( TH t
RIGHTS ONLYRIGHTS ONLY
ROADS - -'"
IMPROVED ROADS . ^ KING'S HIGHWAYS ~^
L O O O B 3 ft*, i G-B-6
' Wf^o5 i W'0 * (XX-^ -^ '^e.^^^; .—. iw-r/few^irl' s-M*t
S ANP AMD CiRflVc.'.
MT C BrSvel Bit
Grovtl File
MTC Orover Pit 2 C-i
M.T.C. Grivel Pit 64T Fpl* 595O
MIC 5io-el Pit M9?
File 59fO6, '
Otiorrv
1CX l ,,. j J J J r ,, ^ c^^- . j Ty'pTO; "' l -7-4^H
| trO O e ? 4t, l J O 0877 M'''—— — -L- — -- — —'— — — — —
AREAS WITHDRAVi.^ FROM DISPOS11 ION
S.R. - SURFACE RIGHTS ' M.R. - MINING RIGHTS
P " /. *^.-;s^53^^^•-— t.- ^f -A-^^pa^/ 1^;:: V.'' TB ^W,"Xr^^^ ^^:^f ^ At'iil AT!/ ^,'t^ ̂ ™* ̂ 7?^-^ '
^flT 2 c^ * ff rB P tr tt w * y is v-/f7--r-''
SCALE f INCH ^ 20 CHAINS-
v ' vsSUMMERS
NIPIGONMINING" Dl.':S O*. - *, - '
8)3573^-D O Q O- — f-——r'TB 06707 19^-701-
fa***,T8 ; T B - ^X iv y i X-^^! THUNDER BAY
THUNER BAY
Natural -^ -" Manpgfcntfit
BEARDMRE,AREA 'G-7G-16542E12SW0868 2.9488 SUMMERS
/r ^67" -V^ -IWt
BASELINE l
42EIESW0068 2.9480 SUMMERS 210
BEARDMORE RESOURCESl
LIMITED
BEARDMORE ONTARIO
TOO SO
SCALE 1:5000
MAY 1986 W. G. H.
SYM BOIS
O
SWAMP
ROAD
TRAIL
TRENCH
C. P. LOCATED
C. P. UNLOCATED
CLAIM LINE
ANOMALOUS ZOM-E
SOIL .ASSAY PLAN
SILVER VALUES
(ppm)
BASELINE 2,
"J.oJBO
BASELINE l
Ua ^ •̂f
UjCios-CM
UjO Oi-cn
Ujoo-4- 3-
Ujo o•V U)
•* *o o
4. Om *
•* *J^ \ ^i tfrf \V- L 3\\*
iCO
rfItfiv#U \^^5-*U\t \f.l.
l ^rTl:
-,*X* .* ^^ sM0 \\
\* \* '\\ \* xi \ * ^\-*'
T ' * 1 if1 -"Isii 10 K1*UiL
\N
^
J*
\i
\4^ \6^ N o ^^ *\* ,5oj o \-S
o* sS^.0 \
Hv B,.*7
——— 1-^ ————
OCi•VUJ
Uio o-i.r^
Uj o o-t- oo
BEARDMORE RESOURCES
LIMI TED
BEARDMORE ON T A RIO
100 50 2*4
SCALE 1:5000MAY 1986 W. G. H.
SYMBOLS
C*.; SWAMP
t.::: ROAD
--.- TRAIL
•— TRENCH
9 C.P. LOCATED
O C.P. UNLOCATED
— — CLAIM LINE
10 ANOMALOUS ZOHc
SOIL ASSAY PLAN-J
42E12SW0068 2.9480 SUMMERS
GOL D VALUES
(ppb)
vu o m*-3-*n
UJc x•i-V)tO
Or UJo
BEARDMORE RESOURCES
LIMITED
BEARDMORE ONTARIO
T ^ ^-J-- -i ffl p ^*T T fr xo*\ \ O.H[
OS05o.*0.6
0.40.4
0.3
0-4-
0.10.4
0.404
0.2.
O.S
04 O.S"
; 0-5 f r^ a4 iOS0.5
* — - -
0,5l V-r. M o.'
''Lit '\ *i0-3 * ^:\*'*\ "'04
\
w
t 03Z *** o-fT•* 0.5"•* 0.4
0.4
0.5— 0.3-
0.6o.So.4
*ro.z.
* O.Z
~^~--^* 0:3-*
\
*̂riv- — * - - b-4
0.4— -
0.60.3ox0.4-
aS"-0-6 *as
0.30.2.0-4
———— Z?.ST
\ OS0-4 T O.fo.*\0.7 \ 0.40.7 \a* 0.4O.M
l O-*\ o.*/
O.S Tas*0.4 1
[
.0-5 OS
i
Ql 0.3
F to0.5 f- r- O.So.v 5 a5n i, * f— ft ?ab 1 as 0"J0.5 r y.i*o*L 0.4o-S^ 0-30-40.60.604050.6
— o.?0.4Of
^ 0-2.0.4as 0.4050.3A
0 "
0.4 - '
^ :i-ii'
* OS* D.S
^ ^.^ afe
0.40.4
— 0.5"-oSOS03
O.Sd.4
^1C
ft*
,3fl-
it
*.
^r^r
r- r*T-*r-co
9 0.30.40*
OS 0.3
O.C, 06L^w
O.iV 0^0.7o.?
— *^t4o Sa?i?. S
—5.4-
a? 0-30.6 o a30 r-, eo ^-5 i^
1
'
os * oS
x i1* *
Tr-OO
iti^-
Jir
as0.6 0.4
05 0.3
T-^^
i^-j*-^r
^Xr
UJ54-r* K)-j
0-3——— 0.5
0.4030.40.30.5-
0.4
0.4tf 0 '3^ o.itf-5 0-4si:
0.4OS 0.4
0.5az.0.4^-z
r(?-4as0.40.7.0.3
ifcas0.40.40-4
'
je
i ^4- \L^^^ VPaOPIBTT,
THUNDf t X^T^I ^^.^ /^
ff^l r '^If ^/xJ TORONTOW eZ~
UJ , ,0 ^? 0 UJi v 2" s -1"ro r-̂
-J J S-
5.70-4
0-40.20-3(t
0ccl
*^
ife•w
* a
7-4J.4.4i-2-ffM
.*-s 4-
5^-0.40.40 3040-t0^0.4Q'
00
/^ ——
"V
T
5* tS
* — t?-^- ^7
0&
OM o.30.4O.?0.4
0.3 0-3o-z0.2.
0.4
J*:
^ ^S:--^.
———— 0.^
d.6o.va.*0.3
oMoM
— v0.4 T0.'0 *-
^ 0.4 a4o.s0.40.40.40.6a6oM 0.4at0.4O."/
x o.t.
fr1C.
——— i — t
0.40.4o.s0.6
0.3 0.4' Ka20.30.1
'
K^*
Ji
r*rv*"* r "r"CO
1 UJ
5J*- ^*
-J
fc^J(r
- *———— d.4
d ^ --^^^ Vffo^
CO CM*J COp-CD
0.3
d.Z
M i
X' -H ——————— ̂ J
^^'
r^
*—- -~
o.z.
k
)
S —
MAY 19
ii
1
i
N
UJo til UJr G Q1" m r^^ -H -t-^* rO J"
J ^^-J -J— -J
*-o.*-
^Xl (J— Q*\
tf.2^^* o.'V
o.jo.30.4 o.W0.406 0.4
0.4o.40.30.4
0.30.4(7-CO.iG. S"— u *^j
^.2. r 0-4
0-5"
0.4- — -^ 0.4o.t "^~^
A b0-so-S 0.60-4O.fc
^ 0-4 0-20-30.40.40.40.4o.4o.r 0.40.40-4 /n "R
o.to.S 0.6
|. 0-40.4 0-?a4 0.4
. 0.6o.40-?OM
oMoS0.6
,.
i
at(M•*rCOr*CO
*
' ^ (O.Ur rf -O ^ ———— — — . i i
04\
100 300 TOO 200
' , 1 - ltam j: ̂ .^ETT: r'Ti;^. —— t ——— " ——— '
SCAL E i: 5000
86 W.G.H.
-
SYMBOLS
7^:. SWAMP
:---: ROAD
---- TRAIL
**-^ TRENCH
* C. P. LOCATED
O C. P. UNLOCATED^* 1 AlKA ..-.——
- •^i.
CLAIM LINE
^ j ANOMALOUS ZONE
/S?s-r /w/^/•V6-.4-
li' '^ uj w y o) uj c. go o o o o^r ^ tf* "^ t-?^ 0vt f ^ ^-^J^^^4^ -^ * ^ o i:T ^ ^ 3- V) 5-' -J f ^7 ^ ^ -J-J w —J
~-J
0.5
0.4-0.4
9̂ 0.40.6 0-4 0.4OS OS0.4as;0-5ato.to.t04O.S*
0-fc^i
^-s-
—— o.-t-6.4
0.6
0.4 0.60.6
0.6 0.4 0.4O.b050.4
3t
0.4
osft C,-LJ.tO..
o.t
f ^r o^ r ^4 1 o.if—— pJ —— tfr -. ———— L..J — *0.4 * ^ l Mr0-3 ( ^ k -^o.z \* ^ f* ^
. o.3__C^ (^ — . tf .1^ ^^- ^v ^ — - ' ^9^ " '"' t — AB* 0.1 0.2 f *- lw w
•J 0.4 ilfe x\ ^ ^ 0.3 ^0-3 ^ X \ k K oM-- 04 K S \\x0-4' o.4 X \ pt ^
0'^\ X K -v-S1 X l — ro
a** 0-5 f X N^L v ao.4 04 ^ 0.4 f ; \. . "-*
M 0-4 M ^\ ." B0"* I 7 \ j.co 0.3 ; NVS tf.*/ \ to4 f y; 0.4 f
o.^ JZx/^f
7 SOIL ASSAY PLAh
X^K
7 -t/~~~ i x SILVER VALUES^.^-y t \
1 4-J7 l \ foom)
42EI2SW0868 2.9488 SUMMERS 230
rO
-J
BEARDMORE RESOURCESLIMITED
BEARD MORE ONTARIO
100 SO 100 2 00
SCALE i: 5000MAY 1986 W.G.H.
O
SYMBOLS
;.' SWAMP.: ROAD
- TRAIL
TRENCH
C. P. LOCATED
C.P. UNLOCATED
— CLAIM LINf
ANOMALOUS ZONE
UJ o
ZASELWE 2
. 10
MAGNETOMETER PLAN
DATUM — 59000 gammas
42E13SW0668 2.9480 SUMMERS 240
BEARDMORE RESOURCES
LIMITED
BEARDMORE ONTARIO
100 50 O l CO 300
SCAL E i: 5000MAY 1986 W.G.H.
SYMBOLS
SWAMP
ROAD
TRAIL
TRENCH
C.P. LOCATED
C.P. UNLOCATED
CLAIM LINE
ANOMALOUS ZONE
s?*r /A. r
BASELINE
SOIL ASSAY PLAN
GOLD VALUES
(ppb)
42E!2SWea6B 2.948C SUMMERS 3B0
x
BASELINE l
x
1 - m w025
L-- 2•"C-\. 1- -f j, — e
/' ,.\ - i i !
ci.VXy)/i,!\
i -'i)"-T|-i'
(*9
Jfc: vi v!^1 col
i/ikfi- r 4— sH—
uj-t-(Vi
CVi
L 9
BEARDMORE RESOURCES
LIMI TEDBEARDMORE ONTARIO
EM-16 PROFILES100 50 2OO
SCALE 1=5000MAY 1986 W. G. H.
SYMBOLS
O
SWAMPROAD
TRAIL TRENCH
C.P. LOCATED
C.P. UNLOCATED
CLAIM LINE
ANOMALOUS ZONE
DIP ANGLE PROFILE SCALE
/
BASELINE 2,
42EiaSW0e6B 2.9480 SUMMERS 260
BASELINE l
42E12SW0068 2.9480 SUMMERS
l
BEARDMORE RESOURCES
LIMI TED
BEAR D MO R E ON T A RIO
100 SO 100
SCALE l: 5000MAY 1986
SYMBOLS
CViT SWAMP
-.-.r: ROAD
--.- TRAIL
-—— TRENCH
9 C.P. LOCATED
O C.P. UNLOCATED
— — CLAIM LINE
O ANOMALOUS ZONE
L. l too E
BASELINE z
20*
W. G. H.
DIP ANGLE (QUADRATURE READING)
E.M. 16 RAW DATA PLAN
2Z0
BASELINE 2
BEARDMORE RESOURCES
LIMITEDBEARDMORE ONTARIO
EM-16 PROFILES200
W.G.H,
D1PANGLE PROFILE SCALE
O o onO O OnT ^ ^ ** -* + 0 l T l————l———l———————
\
/
SCALE i: 5000MAY 1986
SYMBOLS
SWAMP
ROAD
TRAIL
TRENCH
C.P. LOCATED
C.P. UN LOCATE D
CLAIM LINE
ANOMALOUS ZONE
,5efir?-;.S. t***
'Fi*. 9
SUMMERS280
BEARDMORE RESOURCES
LIMITED
BEARDMORE ONTARIO
10050 o 200
SCAL E l: 5000MAY 1986 W.G.H.
SYM BOIS
SWAMP
ROAD
TRAIL
TRENCH
C.P. LOCATED
C.P. UNLOCATED
— CLAIM LINf
"' ANOMALOUS ZONE
Dip ANGLE (QUADRATURE READING)
E.M. 16 RAW DATA PLAN EASTERN PORT ION
42E!2SW00B8 2.9460 SUMMERS 290
ONTARIO
•PROPERTY
N
BASELINE l
H.o-J
-v•v.
•A ^\v*A\v\\A \^\,-A
i*\vAv\tffl
l [ ~~i li !^
riiri1 tty i/H . ^
/, rsi *W-j' ' 51 o S1V' ?t4-:
o *t*J 5"8V'S j 5^.
N f S 1*-j 5iV
^^^J Hlfr-j^lv^ JtM;ii 5iij^ir^^^^3 fv.^-^~
1 "*'V* ft
i
4f HHI frfl
Hll! Mtf-t ^STH! MIH,*af 31?
^ WlH*V1 381mis-n nit33M i
^ ! vuHW[ ^jolr*tt*^~ ~^ ^l MouL
kjQ^H-
O CM
-J
— *
Uj
OQs-
M-J
— -? l;
S5tf
t-'?Loe
CUSIBsslyj1*
H5(
HU.
a**,3lfj 2USIM l-
— *ftNT
"f*U1
svH8x:
M7?lIfl 1 —
fH S*H^tf
Mtfcf
KMli*
413HHo __Ml?
^
St-C\J ^
^J
Z^&jFA/t?
42E12SW0068 2.9480 SUMMERS 300
BEARDMORE RESOURCES
LIMI TED
BEARDMORE ONTARIO
100 30 100 2OO
SCALE l: 5000MAY 1986 W. G. H.
O
SWAMPROAD
TRAIL
TRENCH
C. P. LOCATED
C. P. UNLOCATED
CLAIM LINE
ANOMALOUS ZONE
MAGNETOMETER PLAN
DATUM 59000 gammas
/t
BASELINE
