FYs1617 TDM Application - DRCOG A… · FY 2016 and 2017 DRCOG TDM Pool Application Form Page 2 Briefly describe any innovative features of the proposed project. Example: Project

FY 2016 and 2017 DRCOG TDM Pool Application Form

Page 1

A. GENERAL INFORMATION

Agency Legal Name City of Englewood, Colorado

Address 1000 Englewood Parkway

City/State/Zip Code Englewood, CO 80110

Website www.englewoodgov.org

Identify and provide contact information for:

Person authorized to enter into contracts Project manager for proposed activity(ies)

Only if different from authorized person (e.g., consultant)

Name Randy Penn Name Dave Henderson

Title Mayor Title Engineering/Capital Projects Administrator

Address 1000 Englewood Parkway Address 1000 Englewood Parkway

City, State, ZIP Englewood, CO 80110 City, State, ZIP Englewood, CO 80110

Phone Phone 303-762-2506

Email [email protected] Email [email protected]

1. Project Title Dartmouth Aveneu Shared Bicycle/Parking Lanes

2. Primary Project Type (select one) Indicate which project type is your primary focus and majority of budget (>50%):

Non-infrastructure (marketing, outreach, transit passes, etc.)

Infrastructure (permanently installed, vehicles, bicycle parking, etc.)

Applicant is committed to have a maintenance plan in place for the proposed infrastructure.

3. Project Description (concise abstract limited to 500 characters)

100% engineering design and installation of a shared bicycle/parking lane treatment for Dartmouth Avenue from Inca Street to Clarkson Street.

4. Project Overview (limited to 1,500 characters) Describe your project and what it is going to do. Do not include background information or justification language.

The Dartmouth Avenue Shared Bicycle/Parking Lane is an early implementation item coming out of the Englewood Light Rail Corridor Next Steps Study. Dartmouth has been designated a regional bicycle route by Denver, Englewood, and DRCOG. Dartmouth provides a relatively rare direct connection to the South Platte River Trail. The Englewood Light Rail Corridor Station Area Master Plan identified Dartmouth Avenue as a facility in need of upgrades for bicyclist safety and comfort for the purpose of encouraging increased bicycle ridership to the Englewood Light Rail Station. Dartmouth is a major collector with volumes over 13,000 ADT through the Broadway to Santa Fe section. The Dartmouth Avenue Shared Bicycle/Parking Lane is proposed to cover just over one mile in length from Clarkson to Inca Street, and can be considered a true last mile to transit project. The design will feature 8 foot shared bicycle/parking lanes on either side of the roadway, with a two foot double line design for a buffer, and two 11 foot automobile traffic lanes. Striping will feature both solid lines and dashed lines at crossing streets, alleys, and private drives. Sharrow markings are also included in key locations. Video detection cameras that can distinguish bicycles from cars will also be installed at Broadway, Logan, and Clarkson. The facility will tie in with the existing Little Dry Creek Trail at Inca Street, in order to get bicyclists to the Englewood Station ramp at Floyd Avenue.

5. Project Innovation


Page 2

Briefly describe any innovative features of the proposed project. Example: Project elements haven’t been implemented in the region.

The Dartmouth Avenue Shared Bicycle/Parking Lane project reepresents an innovative retrofit of a tightly constained urban corridor. The striping pattern is unique in that it features a continuous double line buffer that continues through each intersection as dashed lines, signaling caution to turning drivers. The project also incorporates the latest in video camera detection technology, giving more crossing time when bicyclists are detected.

6. Project Tasks List and briefly describe (below) the specific key tasks you will complete in order to successfully implement and finish your project. (Tasks will be referenced in Section F Timeline)

Task # Task Description

Task 1: (required)

Calculation and Compilation of Project Results.

Establish procedures for obtaining “before and after” travel habit information from participants. Conduct pre- and/or post-surveys or implement routine tracking procedures. (Details of methodology to be provided in Question #18)

Task 2. Final Engineering Design

100% Design Construction Drawings and Cost Estimates

Task 3: Bid Project Construction

Release Invitation to Bid and manage competitive bid process.

Task 4: Removal of Existing Striping

Remove any existing lane markings not compatible with new design

Task 5: Installation of New Striping Treatments, Signage, Cameras

Paint new striping treatments, install complementary signage and video detection cameras

Task 6:

Task 7:

Task 8:

Task 9:

Task 10:

B. PROJECT TRAITS

7. What is the geographic target area (overall and/or specific sites) for the project? Is there anything unique about this geographic area? Provide a map of the service area noting specific sites if applicable.

The Dartmouth Avenue project is a true last mile to transit project that will provide a one mile plus facility connection to the Englewood Light Rail Station

8. Non-local government applicants are required to submit a letter of support from the applicable local government (s) where the project is located. Please confirm you have met/corresponded with the local jurisdiction(s) where your project is located and attach the letter of support.

Yes, I confirm and have provided letter(s) of support.

N/A Applicant is a local government.

9. Who is your target audience? Are there any unique demographic or socioeconomic traits of your target population?

The City of Englewood has attracted a higher share of Millenials than any other Denver Metro suburb, due to housing afforability, an urban environment, and access to transit. The City's new Comprhensive Plan process has identified attracting and keeping Millenials as new residents a key economic development strategy for the City, with improved bicycle facilities playing a key part of this strategy. The proposed facility also borders Transporatation Anaylsis Zones with racial minority populations over 33% of the total population, according to the DRCOG Environmental Justice Map. The main intended targets are light rail riders who currently drive to the Englewood LRT Station.

10. Will you be specifically reaching out to any minority or low-income population groups or areas? Yes No


Page 3

If yes, please describe.

11. When will you be ready to start the project? Describe any unique logistical aspects of getting the project started and implemented.

The project would ideally begin with engineering design in the first quarter of 2016, with installation slated for the third quarter of 2016.

12. Will your project be timed or linked with a major roadway construction project? Yes No

If yes, which project, and describe the linkage? (e.g., promoting non-SOV travel modes during construction period)

13. Transit service relation Will your project be timed or linked to a new major transit project?

Yes No

If yes, what transit project, and describe the linkage?

For non-infrastructure projects: Will your project promote or incentivize new or existing transit? Yes No

If yes, please explain.

For infrastructure projects types: Will your project support transit by providing a direct link to transit or by providing multimodal connectivity or support to transit?

Yes No

If yes, please explain.

The Dartmouth Avenue Shared Bicycle/Parking Lane is a true last mile to transit connection to the Engelwood Light Rail Station.

14. List any organization that is a financial (cash or in-kind) partner with you in this project. Is the partnership currently in place? Please explain. A letter of commitment must be provided by each financial partner.

15. Describe how you will collaborate with (or your project will link to) Way to Go’s TDM efforts. (All applicants are required to meet with Way to Go staff to determine potential opportunities to collaborate on projects in some capacity prior to submitting your application.)

The City of Englewood agrees to work with the Way to Go Program for the purpose of cross promotion in the following areas:

Featuring Way to Go on City website

Co-branding collateral materials, such as brochures, pamphlets, business cards and flyers

Social Media

Email Marketing

Press Releases

Surveys


Page 4

C. PROJECT BENEFITS – SOV TRIP and VMT REDUCTION POTENTIAL

The CMAQ program supports two important goals of the U.S. Department of Transportation: improving air quality and relieving congestion. The TDM Pool is focused on the reduction of SOV trips and associated VMT reduction.

The project review panel will consider the reliability of assumptions listed in Question 16 and the clarity of the justifications. Upon project completion, all project awardees must calculate benefits (trips reduced and VMT reduced) as part of their project evaluations in order to receive final reimbursements for their projects.

Example procedures for tracking project benefits include:

Before and after (pre- and post-) surveys of project participants’ travel habits

On-going tracking (e.g., web-based) of participant travel habits from the time they join (e.g., My Way to Go tool)

Post- project reporting of RTD transit ridership changes on specific routes.

If you need assistance, contact DRCOG staff. Example methodologies to predict benefits will be available on the DRCOG website.

16. Trip and VMT reduction potential

a) The following project attributes will lead to a reduction of single occupant vehicle (SOV) trips and vehicle miles of travel (VMT). Provide a number and justification for each applicable project attribute listed below (Provide attachments where necessary).

Project Area Attributes Amount Justification Source of data

1) Residents and employees you expect to reach or contact

1,410 HH Quarter mile trip origination area Broadway to Franklin Street

2010 Census

2) Residents and employees you expect to participate (e.g., sign up, register, receive passes, become members, etc.)

89 1410 HH X 1.17 workers per HH = 1,650 X .09 av transit share = 149 X .6 interested but concerned = 89

2010 Census Tract 58 and 59.51

2013 ACS 5 Yr Estimates Tract 58 and 59.51

3) Current percent of residents driving alone to work

77 % 2013 ACS 5 Year Estimates: Tract 58, 59.51, 59.52

4) Current percent of workplace employees driving alone to work

%

5) Average trip distance of target population currently driving alone (in miles)

1.375 X 2 trips per day = 2.75

Average of shortest and longest possible trip from origination area

GIS

6) A. Program will be active: days per year for years

or B. Facility will be available: 365 days per year for years

7) Other:

8) Other pertinent information that supports the attributes provided above (past results, unique project team skills, case studies/research based on similar project types, etc.).


Page 5

b) (Optional) If desired, you may calculate an estimate of number trips reduced, and/or the VMT reduced as a result of this project. The estimates can be for an average day, or for a year. Provide an explanation of how you calculated the estimates, including formulas and all specific assumptions below, or in an attachment.

Trip Reduction Estimate:

VMT Reduction Estimate:

17. Has your organization been awarded funds in recent DRCOG TDM Pool cycles?

FY 2012/2013 Cycle Project? Yes No Project name:

If yes, was the project completed? Yes No

Are the annualized VMT reduction results reported for this project from the Result Tracking Table the best available?

Yes No

If no, please provide updated information:

FY 2014/2015 Cycle Project? Yes No Project name:

Do you believe your project will meet the level of VMT reduction predicted in the original application?

Briefly describe progress made on specific implementation tasks:

18. Related to Task 1 in Question #6, describe the procedures for how you plan to calculate and compile actual post-project results. (At a minimum, project awardees must conduct a survey, capturing pre- and post-travel habits of project participants to determine results.)

Bicycle counts will be collected at key points along Dartmouth Avenue in order to establish a base line for pre-construction ridership. Counts will be collected at key points along Darmouth Avenue post construction for comparison. A pre and post construction survey invitation will be mailed to all households within a quarter mile of the Dartmouth facility between Broadway and Franklin Street.


Page 6

D. PROJECT FUNDING REQUEST AND BUDGET

Total federal request must be at least $80,000 and a maximum of $300,000. (Note: No more than $100,000 can be requested for bicycle/pedestrian travelway portion of project.)

1. Budget Overview 2016 2017 Total

A. Enter the CMAQ Federal Funds requested, for each year (tab through columns to generate automated calculations)

$100,000 $ $100,000

B. Required 17.21% Local Match* $20,788 $0 $20,788

C. Total Project Cost (federal plus required local match) $120,788 $0 $120,788

* How will you make your required local match? Cash, in-kind, both?

The City will contibute a cash match of $95,000.

What percentage of your local match is in-kind? (e.g., 100%, 75%, 25%, 0%) If you plan to use any in-kind, you must complete an in-kind request form as part of this application. In-kind forms and instructions will be provided at the applicant training.

0 %


Page 7

E. BUDGET DETAILS

Provide a general description and an amount of the expenses you expect to charge to this CMAQ project.

NOTES:

The table below is a regular Word table (not a locked form). Additional rows may be inserted, if needed. You will need to input and calculate all amounts—this table does not automatically calculate. Reminder: Federal procurement rules must be followed.

A. Salaries List each position, hourly rate, and total anticipated hours (over a 2-year period).

Position Hrly. Rate # of Hrs. Total Amt. (For future use - Do not

input in this column)

Sample: Administrator $50 100 $5,000

B. Media Do not list specific media outlets, but provide general descriptions, such as “Fall newspaper campaign”.

C. Incentives

D. Equipment Specific to implement the project.

E. Production Printing, web development, mailings, etc.

F. Consultants List any subcontractors by function rather than name.

Construction Engineering Design $37,000

G. Costs associated with physical infrastructure or vehicles $144,000

H. Other Please define.

Bicycle Counts and Survey $15,000

TOTAL (Calculate and enter amount manually - should equal Row C Total in

Budget Overview in Section D)

$195,000


Page 8

F. TIMELINE

Complete the timeline below, indicating the months applicable to each task. Your project will begin upon receipt of your contract. 1. The tasks in the timeline should correspond to those identified in Question 6 (Project Overview Details). 2. Copy each task (from Question 6) into the blank text box below the task # (see example). 3. Place an “X” in the applicable month(s) to each task.

(place an ‘ X’ in the applicable month)

Year 1 Year 2

(FY2015) FY2016 FY2017 (FY2018)

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Task 1 Task 1 Task 1 Calculation and Compilation

of Project Results X X

Task 2 Task 2 Task 2

Final Engineering Design X X X


BID Project Construction X X X


Removal of Existing Striping X

Task 5 Task 5 Task 5 Installation of New Striping Treatments,

Signage, Cameras X X




Date Prepared: June 4, 2015

Pay Unit Unit Cost¹ Quantity Extended Cost

1 Traffic Striping LF $0.60 500 $3003 Share the Road Pavement Markings EA $250.00 3 $7504 Bicycle Boulevard Signage EA $250.00 4 $1,0005 Crosswalks EA $500.00 2 $1,000

$3,050

% Used Cost

N / A $3,050 ( A )

30.0% $915 ( B )

5.0% $153 ( C )

5.0% $153 ( D )

1.0% $31 ( E )

3.0% $92 ( F )

1.0% $31 ( G )

5.0% $153 ( H )

10.0% $305 ( I )

1.0% $31 ( J )

5.0% $153 ( K )

10.0% $507 ( L )

$6,000 ( M )

2025 Construction Cost Future Cost using current rate of inflation (2%) over 11 years (M)*(F/P,2,11) $8,000 ( N )

EngineeringConstruction Engineering 10% of ( M ) 10.0% $1,000 ( O )

Prelim.& Final Design + Envir. Clearance 16% of ( M ) 16.0% $960 ( P )

$2,000 ( Q )

Right of WayPay Unit Unit Cost Quantity

Right-of-Way and Permanent Easements SF $25.00 0 $0 ( R )

$0 ( S )

$8,000

¹Based on CDOT 2014 Cost data

²ROW $/SF based on conceptual level costs provided by the City of Littleton on another project. Confirm with City of Englewood. RTD not accounted for in costs. Could be reduced through donations.

City of Englewood - Next Steps Study

Conceptual Estimate of Project Costs- 5% Design

Bicycle Boulevard - Oxford Avenue - Irving to Lowell

Item Notes

% Range

Project Construction Bid Items Project Dependent

Contingencies (10 - 30%) of A

Utilities (some relocations possible) (3 - 20%) of (A)

Drainage (4 - 10%) of (A)

Irrigation (1 - 2%) of (A)

Erosion Control (2 - 5%) of (A)

Environmental Mitigation (1 - 5%) of (A)

Total Engineering (O+P)

Signing and Striping (1 - 5%) of (A)

Construction Signing & Traffic Control (2 - 20%) of (A)

Lighting (1 - 5%) of (A)

Landscape (1 - 20%) of (A)

Mobilization(4 - 20%) of (A+B+C+D+E+F+G+H+I+J+K)

Total of Construction Bid Items (A+B+C+D+E+F+G+H+I+J+K+L)

Total ROW (S)

Total Project Cost ( N+Q+S)

Opinion of Probable Construction Costs

In providing opinions of probable construction cost, the Client understands that Toole Design Group has no control over costs or the price of labor, equipment or materials, or over the

Contractor's method of pricing, and that the opinions of probable construction costs provided herein are to be made on the basis of our qualifications and experience. TDG makes no warranty,

expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of such opinions as compared to bid or actual costs.



1 Clearing and Grubbing LS $5,000.00 1 $5,0001 Removal of Curb & Gutter LF $6.50 3 $201 Removal of Asphalt Mat SY $5.25 700 $3,6751 Removal of Sidewalk SY $10.25 10,000 $102,5001 Earthwork (20% of Pavement Costs) % $61,300.00 1 $61,3001 Traffic Striping LF $0.60 20,000 $12,0001 Pavement - Concrete SY $75.00 1,500 $112,500 Raised Crossings

1 Pavement - Hot Mix Asphalt (Replacement near curb work) SY $58.00 500 $29,000 Replacement near curb and raised crossings

1 Curb and Gutter LF $20.00 1,400 $28,0001 Concrete Sidewalk & Trail SY $55.00 3,000 $165,000

$518,995

% Used Cost

N / A $518,995 ( A )

30.0% $155,699 ( B )

20.0% $103,799 ( C )

10.0% $51,900 ( D )

2.0% $10,380 ( E )

5.0% $25,950 ( F )

4.0% $20,760 ( G )

5.0% $25,950 ( H )

5.0% $25,950 ( I )

2.0% $10,380 ( J )

10.0% $51,900 ( K )

5.0% $50,083 ( L )

$1,052,000 ( M )

2025 Construction Cost Future Cost using current rate of inflation (2%) over 11 years (M)*(F/P,2,11) $1,309,000 ( N )


Prelim.& Final Design + Envir. Clearance 16% of ( M ) 16.0% $168,320 ( P )

$273,000 ( Q )



$0 ( S )

$1,325,000


²ROW $/SF based on conceptual level costs provided by the City of Littleton on another project. Confirm with City of Englewood. RTD not accounted for in costs.



Shared-Use Path - Oxford Avenue - Navajo to Irving

Item Notes

% Range








Signing and Markings (1 - 5%) of (A)










Total ROW (S)





1 Clearing and Grubbing LS $5,000.00 1 $5,0002 Removal of Curb & Gutter LF $6.50 3 $203 Removal of Asphalt Mat SY $5.25 30,000 $157,5004 Removal of Sidewalk SY $10.25 4,000 $41,0005 Earthwork (20% of Pavement Costs) % $546,900.00 1 $546,9006 Concrete Buffers (Median Cover Concrete) SY $65.00 10,500 $682,5007 Pavement - Hot Mix Asphalt SY $58.00 24,000 $1,392,0008 Curb and Gutter LF $20.00 10,000 $200,0009 Concrete Sidewalk & Separated Bike Lane SY $55.00 12,000 $660,000

$3,684,920

% Used Cost

N / A $3,684,920 ( A )

30.0% $1,105,476 ( B )

20.0% $736,984 ( C )

10.0% $368,492 ( D )

1.0% $36,849 ( E )

5.0% $184,246 ( F )

2.0% $73,698 ( G )

5.0% $184,246 ( H )

5.0% $184,246 ( I )

2.0% $73,698 ( J )

5.0% $184,246 ( K )

5.0% $340,855 ( L )

$7,158,000 ( M )

2025 Construction Cost Future Cost using current rate of inflation (2%) over 11 years (M)*(F/P,2,11) $8,901,000 ( N )


Prelim.& Final Design + Envir. Clearance 16% of ( M ) 16.0% $1,145,280 ( P )

$1,861,000 ( Q )



$0 ( S )

$9,019,000


²ROW $/SF based on conceptual level costs provided by the City of Littleton on another project. Confirm with City of Englewood. RTD not accounted for in costs.





Total ROW (S)















% Range




Separated Bikeway - Oxford Avenue - Broadway to Navajo

Item Notes



1 Traffic Striping LF $0.60 500 $3002 Traffic Markings EA $250.00 3 $7503 Share the Road Pavement Markings EA $250.00 31 $7,7504 Bicycle Boulevard Signage EA $250.00 8 $2,0005 Crosswalks EA $500.00 1 $500

$11,300

% Used Cost

N / A $11,300 ( A )

30.0% $3,390 ( B )

5.0% $565 ( C )

5.0% $565 ( D )

1.0% $113 ( E )

3.0% $339 ( F )

1.0% $113 ( G )

5.0% $565 ( H )

10.0% $1,130 ( I )

1.0% $113 ( J )

5.0% $565 ( K )

10.0% $1,876 ( L )

$21,000 ( M )




$5,000 ( Q )



$0 ( S )

$26,000



Total ROW (S)



















% Range




Bicycle Boulevard - Oxford Avenue - Clarkson to Broadway

Item Notes



1 Traffic Striping LF $0.60 500 $3002 Traffic Markings EA $250.00 3 $7503 Share the Road Pavement Markings EA $250.00 40 $10,0004 Bicycle Boulevard Signage EA $250.00 12 $3,0005 Crosswalks EA $500.00 2 $1,000

$15,050

% Used Cost

N / A $15,050 ( A )

30.0% $4,515 ( B )

0.0% $0 ( C )

0.0% $0 ( D )

0.0% $0 ( E )

0.0% $0 ( F )

0.0% $0 ( G )

0.0% $0 ( H )

10.0% $1,505 ( I )

0.0% $0 ( J )

0.0% $0 ( K )

10.0% $2,107 ( L )

$23,000 ( M )




$6,000 ( Q )



$0 ( S )

$29,000



Total ROW (S)













Drainage






(4 - 10%) of (A)

% Range




Bicycle Boulevard - S. Clarkson Street - Detail A

Item Notes



1 Clearing and Grubbing LS $5,000.00 1 $5,0002 Removal of Curb & Gutter LF $6.50 3 $203 Removal of Concrete Pavement SY $13.00 0 $04 Removal of Asphalt Mat SY $5.25 600 $3,1505 Removal of Sidewalk SY $10.25 800 $8,2006 Pavement - Concrete SY $75.00 0 $07 Curb and Gutter LF $20.00 1,200 $24,0008 Concrete Sidewalk & Trail SY $55.00 1,344 $73,9209 Share the Road Pavement Markings EA $250.00 32 $8,00010 Bicycle Boulevard Signage EA $250.00 8 $2,00011 Crosswalks EA $500.00 16 $8,000 North of ped bridge

$132,290

% Used Cost

N / A $132,290 ( A )

30.0% $39,687 ( B )

5.0% $6,615 ( C )

10.0% $13,229 ( D )

1.0% $1,323 ( E )

3.0% $3,969 ( F )

1.0% $1,323 ( G )

0.0% $0 ( H )

5.0% $6,615 ( I )

1.0% $1,323 ( J )

5.0% $6,615 ( K )

5.0% $10,649 ( L )

$224,000 ( M )




$58,000 ( Q )



$0 ( S )

$282,000








Total ROW (S)







Notes

(3 - 20%) of (A)


Utilities (some relocations possible)Contingencies (10 - 30%) of A



Bicycle Boulevard - S. Clarkson Street - Detail B

Item

% Range

Project Construction Bid Items





Project Dependent



1 Removal of Striping SF $5.00 2,750 $13,7502 Traffic Signal Video Detection EA $12,000.00 3 $36,0003 Traffic Signage EA $250.00 26 $6,5004 Traffic Striping LF $0.60 26,095 $15,6575 Traffic Markings EA $250.00 27 $6,7506 Crosswalks EA $1,000.00 4 $4,000

$82,657

% Used Cost

N / A $82,657 ( A )

30.0% $24,797 ( B )

3.0% $2,480 ( C )

5.0% $4,133 ( D )

1.0% $827 ( E )

2.0% $1,653 ( F )

1.0% $827 ( G )

10.0% $8,266 ( I )

1.0% $827 ( J )

5.0% $4,133 ( K )

10.0% $13,060 ( L )

$144,000 ( M )




$37,000 ( Q )



$0 ( S )

$181,000










Total ROW (S)











% Range




Separated Bikeway - Dartmouth Aveune - Short Term Solution

Item Notes

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

Broad

way

Evans Ave

Oxford Ave

This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information

on an "as is" basis and makes no guarantee, representation or warranty, either express or implied,

that the data will be error free. DRCOG further makesno guarantees, representations or warranties, either

express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy orcorrectness of the data, or as to merchantability or

fitness of the data for a particular use or purpose. DRCOGis not responsible to any user for any costs, expenses,liabilities or damages arising from inconsistencies in its

data or from any use of the information.

SOURCE DATA: Enter all data sources here, included base map information

Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet)LEGE

NDEnglewood

0 0.2 0.4Miles

ÜPJ 6/17/2015

\\cogshare\Transportation\\TDM\TDM Program Pool\TDM Program Pool (2016-2017)\Maps\Englewood\TDM_2016_2017_Englewood.mxd

Dartmouth Ave

Floyd Ave

Hampden Ave

Yale Ave

Iliff Ave

Iliff Av

e

Delaw

are St

Sherm

an St

Loga

n St

Broad

way

Frank

lin St

KÁ

Kenyon Ave

I§

Project Location

Urban Center AreaRapid Transit (Current) $1Rapid Transit (Future) $1

Documents

FYs1617 TDM Application - DRCOG A… · FY 2016 and 2017 DRCOG TDM Pool Application Form Page 2 Briefly describe any innovative features of the proposed project. Example: Project