Upload
kimberly-farrell
View
218
Download
5
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Future of 6th Form Funding
WELCOME
Housekeeping
• Please switch off all mobile devices
• Fire evacuation procedure
• Toilets
• Delegate packs
• Q&A (index cards)
• Evaluation forms
• Presentations can be downloaded:http://6thformdemandledconsultations.acclaimlive.com/presentations
Agenda
• The Case for Change
• How the System Will Work
• The Funding Formula & Feedback from Trials
• Question & Answer Session - Chair and Panel
• Summary & Next Steps
• Close
Future of 6th Form Funding
THE CASE FOR CHANGE
14-19 Reform Group (DfES)
14-19 Reform objectives
• Boosting participation, progression and attainment
• An engaging curriculum with qualifications more valued by employers and HE
• Better guidance and support
• Full range of choices available in each local area
• Supported through funding system meeting principles set out in FE White Paper
14-19 Targets
• 90% participation at age 17 by 2015
• Reduce the number of young people not in education, employment or training (NEET)
• 85% of 19 year olds attaining level 2 by 2013
• Raise the participation age
Why?Post-16 training/skills are biggest weaknesses…
Age stage 0-11 11-19 Workforce HE
OECD ranking
Post-16 participation rate
Proportion of workforce with skills above Level 2
Research outputProportion of
4 year-olds enrolled in education
10 year old reading and literacy
15 year old mathematics and literacy
3
7
20 18
24
Survival rate on academic courses
2 - 6
14-19 Reforms• Entitlement for all young people to have access to 14
Diploma lines from 2013
• To deliver this institutions will need to collaborate
• The funding will need to support this particularly:– learner choice driving funding allocations
– a common funding system with comparable rates
– incentivising institutions to improve participation, progression and achievement rates
– a simple, transparent and easy to understand system, based on a relationship between LSC and providers
Diploma timetable
2008/09 First teaching of Diplomas in ICT, Health & Social Care,
Engineering, Creative & Media, Construction
2009/10 Land based, Manufacturing, Hair and Beauty, Business
Administration, Hospitality
2010/11 Public services, Sport & leisure, Retail, Travel & Tourism
2013 14-19 entitlement in place
Future of 6th Form Funding
HOW THE SYSTEM WILL WORK
Key principles of the 14-19 landscape
• To ensure every young person can exercise their 14-19 entitlement and
– undertake elements of programmes in other institution and
– access a broad programme of learning
• With planning overseen by the 14-19 partnership and
– effective collaboration
• The White Paper challenges us to develop a system which:
– incentivises improved participation, progression and achievement factors
• Whilst being
– transparent, simple and avoiding bureaucracy
• And providing
– appropriate stability and certainty for planning
Further Education Raising Skills: Improving life chances
The Challenge
Principles of ademand led system
• Purchasing power devolved to employers and individuals
• Expanding choice and quality of provision
• Intervening in areas of market failure
• Building capacity
• Appropriate levels of planning
• Collaboration and competition
• Responsiveness to demand
Demand Led Models
Apprenticeships 16-18
Employer Responsive Model19
+16
–18
Learner Driven Employer Driven
16-18 Model
Learner Responsive Model
14- 19 Partnership
Research needs and demand to meet entitlement
14-19 Plan
LA/LSC Review Provision against plan
LA/LSC agree contributions to plan by discussion and agreement with schools, colleges and providers
Allocation calculated
How does it work?
Option 1:Strategic Commissioning
14-19 Planrequirements
Growth built intofuture baseline
Assess previouscontribution and
performance
Plan changes andnegotiated
growth
Allocation basedon plan
Review actualdelivery
14-19 planrequirements
Reconcile atYear-end
RetrospectiveAdjustments
(up and down)
Assess previouscontribution and
performance
Plan changes andnegotiated growth
Allocationbased on
previous yearand plan
Review actualdelivery andreconciliation
based on Septemberrecruitment
Adjust allocation mid-year(up or down)
Option 2: 16-18 ModelStrategic Commissioning with reconciliation
ReconciliationSchool sixth forms 2005/06 to 2006/07 % change in funding (formula + MFF)
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
1 201 401 601 801 1001 1201 1401 1601Schools
% c
ha
ng
e i
n f
un
din
g
↑£93.2M
↓£49.4M
ReconciliationSchool sixth forms 2005/06 to 2006/07 % change in funding (formula + MFF)
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
1 201 401 601 801 1001 1201 1401 1601Schools
% c
ha
ng
e i
n f
un
din
g
FE colleges funding v allocation 2005/06
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
1 51 101 151 201 251 301 351
Colleges
% v
ari
ati
on
in
fu
nd
ing
↑£100.2M↓£33.2M
Reconciliation
Demographic data Numbers of 16-18 year olds in England
1,840,000
1,860,000
1,880,000
1,900,000
1,920,000
1,940,000
1,960,000
1,980,000
2,000,000
2,020,000
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Year
Declining pupil numbers in the future?
School sixth forms Possible % funding changes in 2012/13
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
1 201 401 601 801 1001 1201 1401 1601
Schools
% c
han
ge
in f
un
din
g
Balancing incentivesand stability
Create demand-led incentives
Create stability and certainty for provider
planning
Other significantchanges for schools
• New formula involves success rates
• Revised data collection
• Disadvantage factor uses IMD 2004
• Creation of ALS budget (from existing budget)
LLDD including SEN
LLDD/SEN Costs
ALS Formula
Provision Costs
New Diplomas
• Collaborative arrangements
• Pre-16 “off site provision”
• Pre-16 “whole school funding” consultation
• Post-16 funding flow
Transitional protection
• Aim – to reduce the effects of funding changes that result directly from the formula
• May be similar to the Minimum Funding Floor in schools
Key Issues for Consultation
• 16-18 - Incentives v predictability
• Revised data - Early or accurate collection
• Disadvantage - Use of IMD 2004
• ALS Allocation - Impact on rates
• Diplomas - Funding flow
Future of 6th Form Funding
THE NEW FUNDINGFORMULA
Funding formula
Standard learner number (SLN)x
National Funding Rate x
Provider Factor+
Additional Learning Support (ALS)=
FUNDING ALLOCATION OR OUTTURN IN £
Standard learner number
• Definition of a start - 6 weeks for longer courses
• Based on nominal guided learning hours for the qualifications each learner studies
• SLN = glh/450 with maximum of 1.75
– Calculated individually for each pupil
• Funding allocations use SLNs that are based on discussions each Autumn
• In-year monitoring using Schools Census data
National funding rate
• Announced annually by LSC
• In 2008/09 expected to be around £3,000 per SLN
How does this compare with current rates?
Provider factor
• Calculated annually using previous data
• Provider factor contains
– Programme weighting
– Disadvantage (based on IMD 2004)
– Area costs
– Success factor (uses published success rates for each school)
• For 2008/09 funding allocations, the provider factor will be calculated using PLAMS 2006/07
Implications of the changes
• Maximum funding per pupil is calculated on individuals
– lower level than now
• Funding per qualification is increased
• Success element increased
Sample calculationfor a ‘real’ school
SPC Data PLAMS Data
Funding Rate
Pupil Pupil SLN £3,011School Name Headcount Headcount
199 198 297 1.50
Provider FactorsSPC Data PLAMS Data
Area Disadvantage Programme Success Success ProviderCost Uplift Weight Rate Factor Factor
1.0000 1.0100 1.0561 92% 0.9600 1.0240
SPC Data PLAMS Data2006/07 Funding A4C Percentage
incl. pensions Funding Change£911,727 £916,293 0.5%
Aim Data Comparison
Source AS/A2 levels Applied A / AVCE GNVQ GCSE NVQ Other Total aims
SPC 797 1 0 8 0 0 806
PLAMS 790 0 0 0 0 0 790
SLN Per Pupil
A ‘real’ school
Additional learning support
• Lower level claims
– Partly based on formula using prior attainment
– Partly based on negotiation
• Higher level claims
– Based on evolving SEN model
Funding trials
• Trials took part with 18 volunteer schools
– These schools provided 2005/06 data in PLAMS format
– LSC compared funding using new formula with actual allocations
– Schools/LSC meetings and visits
Confirmed
Unconfirmed
No data
PLAMS data 2006/7Number of Sixth Forms
1723
32
39
PLAMS v SPC data
Numbers of PupilsSPC 361,249 PLAMS 357,758 Variation –1.0%
PLAMS v SPC data 2006/07 Pupil Numbers
-100
-50
0
50
100
1 201 401 601 801 1001 1201 1401 1601
Sixth Form
Dif
fere
nc
e
Variations by schools
A levels
PLAMS v SPC 2006/07 - Numbers of A level subjects
-100
-50
0
50
100
1 201 401 601 801 1001 1201 1401 1601
Sixth Forms
Dif
fere
nc
eVariations by schools
Numbers of A-level subjectsSPC 1,145,227 PLAMS 1,121,781 Variation –2.0%
Modelling for all
• Next steps
– All schools will receive a comparison of PLAMS and September pupil count 2006/07
– Schools are asked to ensure June PLAMS submissions are accurate, with help from LSC
– Comparisons of funding approaches are only accurate where SPC and PLAMS closely match
Future of 6th Form Funding
Comfort Break
Question & Answer Session -
Chair and Panel
Future of 6th Form Funding
NEXT STEPS
Diploma timetable
2008/09 First teaching of Diplomas in ICT, Health & Social Care,
Engineering, Creative & Media, Construction
2009/10 Land based, Manufacturing, Hair and Beauty, Business
Administration, Hospitality
2010/11 Public services, Sport & leisure, Retail, Travel & Tourism
2013 14-19 entitlement in place
National next steps
• Post 16 Consultation Ends End March
• School funding arrangements 2008 -11 March - June
• Ministerial Decisions April - July
• Feedback on PLAMS Data April
National next steps
• PLAMS Data Collection June
• Success Rates Calculated Autumn
• Indicative Allocations & Dialogue Autumn
• School Census Collection October
• Final Allocations March 2008
Please hand in your completed evaluation forms
on your way out. Thank you.
Future of 6th Form Funding