Evolution-The Real Truth

8/22/2019 Evolution-The Real Truth

1/25

EVOLUTION: THE TRUTH?

By Ronald Powell, Th.D.

INDEX

Preface | Evolution: A Cult |A Look at the Universe | Monkey Business |AFew Last Facts

This short work, "Evolution: The Truth" can be used to lead someone to Jesus Christ. It was originally done in anEnglish/Chinese Mandarin version and first published in 1994. From the first four thousand copies there were fourhundred and five Chinese that wrote back that they had received the Lord Jesus Christ as their Saviour! Six thousandmore were printed and from the first five hundred of those there have been an additional one hundred and fifty-five plussaved. As of the end of September 1997, 653 people have written the author and stated that they were saved fromreading this anti-evolution book.

Ron Powell, Th.D., has published seven books with all of them being given away except for six hundred which were sold,to help print another book. Brother Powell has over 72,000 books in print with 71,400 of those being given away for free.Yes, no charge to the recepients. He believes the Gospel is to be free. To see a list of Dr. Powell's books, click here.

Since Dr. Powell gives almost everything away he operates on a shoe-string budget. He has no funds to reprint with. Dr.Powell has been wanting to reprint his books, but no one has seen the need to help the last two years. If you would like tohelp print some of his books, you may contact him at: P. O. Box 962, Madisonville, TN 37354-6862 or E-mail at:[email protected]. Presently, he does not have any funds to reprint and looks like never will unless someone asksGod if they should help.

Web site:Philippine Baptist Mission Ron Powell D.R.E., Th.D. (President and Founder) Mailing address: P.O. Box962 Madisonville, TN 37354-0962 Sent through:Bible Believers' Baptist Church, 12200 West Rockwell Rd. Amarillo,Texas 79119 Pastor: Glen Stocker.

Dr. Powell's e-mail address is: [email protected]

PREFACE

The purpose of this small book is to allow the Chinese people to read information that is available to the English speakingworld concerning evolution.

There are quite an extensive use of quotes from scientific books within this small work. This is to establish the fact thatevolution is not really even a theory, not a fact, and to show you, the Chinese people, that in the circles of highereducation, especially in America, there are many scientists that openly laugh at anyone who believes in the evolution cult.

You will not learn that evolution is false at your local Science Museum, but the information is available to anyone who is

sincerely trying to find the truth.

This cult of evolution has become a religion in many places of higher education. Yes, a religion built upon faith! You havea religion or a cult when you add "faith". It is faith when what you believe cannot actually be proven. If evolution is correct,then Genesis 1:1 is not true. If Genesis 1:1 is not true, then there is not a God. If there is not a God, then we are animalsthat do not need to worry about eternity, hell, heaven, and judgment for the way we live our lives. Thus evolution is one ofthe many cults of Satan built upon faith. After you finish reading this book I believe that you will come to see that, indeed,scientific evidence does not support evolution.

You now have in your hands a small book that will open up a new world to you about the god of the false scientificcommunity.


2/25

Return to top

CHAPTER ONE

EVOLUTION: A CULT

The theory of evolution is a theory that all living things have arisen by a materialistic evolutionary process from a single

source, which itself arose from a dead, inanimate world. This theory is also called the molecule-to-man theory.

The Creation model, on the other hand, postulates that all basic animal and plant types were brought into existence byacts of a supernatural Creator using special processes which are not in operation today.

Thus what we have are two different and very conflicting ideas of how everything came about.

Many modern scientists [?] accept evolution as a fact. When the widely-known geneticist and evolutionist, Dr. TheodosiusDobzhansky was alive he said, "The occurrence of the evolution of life in the history of the earth is established about aswell as events not witnessed by human observers can be." 1 Almost all text books in schools assert that evolution is aproven fact beyond argument. They believe it unthinkable to even think that evolution is anything but a pure science. Onthe other hand there is much scientific support against evolution. Strictly speaking evolution does not even qualify as a

theory!

What qualifies a theory to be accepted as scientific? The famous evolutionist, George Gaylord Simpson, said, "It isinherent in any definition of science that statements that cannot be checked by observation are not really about anything .. . or at the very least, they are not science." 2

In other words it is impossible to observe evolution in action, therefore it is impossible to establish it, not only as fact, butimpossible to establish it even as a theory!

Straight and simple: To believe in evolution you need blind, rabid, faith in something that is not only impossible to prove,but in which true scientific facts are found to not even remotely support! Remember, to be true scientifically it must beobserved!

The Chinese people are taught from childhood that persons in authority are always right: their school teachers; theirleaders; etc. When a young Chinese student hears a teacher put forward evolution as established fact, the student willusually believe the teacher. After all, isn't the teacher always right? The Chinese do not realize until about the second orthird year of college that their teachers were wrong many times in many ways. The girls, especially realize this after ateacher has tried to force them into doing something they do not wish to do or has given them a undeserved bad grade fornot cooperating. Thus the students awake to the many contradictions in his or her society, but most never get over thebrain washing effect that evolutionary teaching has had on their minds.

You must think for yourself. Below are some thought provoking questions to make you start thinking for yourself again.

What does an evolutionist actually believe? He or she believes that all kinds of life came from one common ancestorwhich came from dead chemicals. In turn these dead chemicals themselves arose from a dead world, which arose afterbeing in an explosion which came from a cloud of gas which formed itself from a voidless nothing! Tsk, tsk!

Question: How can anything come to life if it is dead? While laughing at the resurrection of Jesus Christ, they believe in aresurrection of all life from nothing! Tsk, tsk.

Question: Better yet, can anything come to life of itself when it never was?

Question: How can an explosion create anything but chaos?

Question:Are you saying a gigantic explosion will not kill?


3/25

Question: Do you really expect me to believe an explosion was the deciding factor in the creation of life? I thoughtexplosions, of the magnitude that would send planets flying through the universe, would kill life, not create it!

Question: Before the gas cloud exploded [Gas becoming billions of tons of rocks?] how did it form? The gas had to havea beginning, didn't it?

Question: If it came from nothing how can something come from nothing? Isn't that faith?

Question: When you have faith don't you have a religion?

Question: How can 0 + 0 equal life when it does not even equal one? If it did equal one then how can one femaleproduce offspring? Okay, how could one male produce offspring? Oh, a single cell became two? Then somewhere alongthe evolutionary trail you had to have male and female.

Question: Which one came first, the male or the female? How could one male produce? How could just one femaleproduce? If evolution is correct then somewhere in history there had to be just one whale, one monkey, one lizard, right?Was that one, a male or female?

Question: Do both fish and man have eyes because man evolved from a fish or because both man and fish needed tosee, in order to fulfill their intended creative purpose?

With simple, basic, reasoning we can see that evolution has more than a few major problems!

What about me? No problem. I claim to have faith in a God that created everything from nothing. Where did God comefrom? I do not know. I believe by faith! Isn't that what the evolutionists believe by, faith? It is a whole lot easier to believe aGod created all of this precision in the universe, diversity of life, and with such intricate design, than to believe a typhooncould create a Mercedes by blowing through a junk yard!

The evolutionists probably believe in some kind of "New Math" because they can take nothing and come up with, not onlyone, but literally thousands and thousands of life forms on the earth! Pure, rabid, blind, faith. A real cult!

Let us suppose that somehow modern scientists did produce life or a totally different species. Would that not prove thatthere was a hand guiding and controlling the creation? Yes, it would prove that it had to be created and could not evolveof itself from dead matter! They would succeed in only proving Creation to be true!

Please forgive me if I am speaking too plain for you, but I am an American and we do speak somewhat more blunt thanother peoples. This false theory has been pushed down the throats of the Chinese people long enough and it is long pasttime to put the truth into the Chinese language.

"A definition of science given by the Oxford Dictionary is:

A branch of study which is concerned either with a connected body of demonstrated truths or with observed factssystematically classified and more or less colligated by being brought under general laws, and which includestrustworthy methods for the discovery of new truths within its own domain." 3

Thus, many who believe in evolution insist that since Creation [God creating everything] cannot be proven, cannot bedemonstrated, cannot be observed, and has not been witnessed by human observers, that Creation should be refusedconsideration.

They fail to see that evolution also fails to meet all of these criteria. For example it is obvious that there were no humansliving long enough to observe the evolutionary changes that they claim should have taken place. Evolution has neverbeen demonstrated in a laboratory and never will be because of the time, they themselves say, that is required for naturalselection to occur. It is obvious that there were no human observers to witness the creation of the natural universe or thebeginning, whatever that is to an evolutionist. No one has ever observed an amphibian turning into an ape or any othercreature. Yes, evolution has been put forward as a fact when it actually requires more faith than it does to believe, "In thebeginning God created the heaven and the earth." [Genesis 1:1].

Even Dobzhansky, as quoted earlier, who is totally committed to faith in evolution has said, "Evolution has not beenwitnessed by human observers." 4


4/25

Another rabid evolutionist, Richard B. Goldschmidt said, "It is true that nobody has thus far produced a new species orgenus, etc., by macromutation. It is equally true that nobody has produced even a species by the selection ofmicromutations." 5

The very item that the evolutionist claims the Creationist cannot prove, is also the item that proves evolution cannot everbe a proven fact! That item is: To be a scientific fact it must be demonstrated! Evolution cannot possibly qualify as ascientific fact. This is admitted by Dobzhansky when he says,

"These evolutionary happenings are unique, unrepeatable, and irreversible. It is impossible to turn a land vertebrate into a

fish as it is to effect the reverse transformation. The applicability of the experimental method to the study of such uniquehistorical processes is severely restricted [Editor's note: I'll say! A real understatement!] before all else by the timeintervals involved, which far exceed the lifetime of any human experimenter. And yet it is just such impossibility that isdemanded by anti-evolutionists when they ask for 'proofs' of evolution which they would magnanim- ously accept assatisfactory." 6

Do you realize what this poor lost soul is crying about? He has plainly admitted that his cult of evolution cannot be provenand he is hurt and upset because people like me are asking him to meet the same criteria that he demands from us. Thatis: proof, demonstrable proof, human observance now and at the original creation. He wants we Creationists to meet hisstandards for proof, but when he is asked to meet his own standards, he cries in his beer admitting that he cannot!

Matthews, a British biologist and evolutionist, in his introduction to a 1971 publication of Darwin's "Origin of Species",says,

"The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded onan unproven theory - is it then a science of faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in specialcreation - both are concepts which believers know to be true but neither, up to the present, has been capable of proof." 7

Many famous scientists are now openly expressing their doubts concerning evolution. "Dr. G. A. Kerkut, Professor ofPhysiology and Biochemistry, University of Southampton, England, is one of the Professors who has questioned the oldNeodarwinian transformism. Professor Kerkut writes:

'The attempt to explain all living forms in terms of an evolution from a unique source, though a brave and valid attempt, isone that is premature and one that is not satisfactorily supported by present-day evidence.'" 8

There it is! Their system is built upon faith. Their leaders, in the know, realize this fact and admit to it! And not only admitthat they believe by faith, but that the evolution theory cannot possibly be proven. It is the lower ones, like the schoolteachers, the college professors that are unaware that they, themselves, are teaching a system built upon faith and onethat cannot be proven. Thus the poor students are taught by teachers, by Hollywood movies, by their leaders trying to acteducated, that evolution is true and they also grow up believing this terrible lie. There is nothing so stupid as an educatedfool!

The evolutionist, though claiming not to believe in miracles, actually do. Their own kind of miracle.

They say that Creation of God cannot be right because: FROG t = instantaneous = PRINCE = FAIRY TALE

Yet, they will say, if given enough time, [300 million years] anything is possible!

FROG t = 300 million years = PRINCE = SCIENCE 9

Time is the miracle worker for the cult of evolution. If given enough time they believe that anything is possible!

The very intellectual evolutionist French zoologist Dr. Pierre P. Grasse attacked evolution in one of his books andDobzanhansky when trying to defend Darwinism said this,

"The book of Pierre P. Grasse is a frontal attack on all kinds of 'Darwinism'. Its purpose is 'to destroy the myth ofevolution, as a simple, understood, and explained phenomenon,' and to show that evolution is a mystery about which littleis, and perhaps can be known. Now one can disagree with Grasse but not ignore him. He is the most distinguished ofFrench zoologists, the editor of the 28 volumes of "Traite de Zoologie", author of numerous original investigations, andex-president of the Academie des Sciences. His knowledge of the living world is encyclopedic."10


5/25

Scott M. Huse B.S., M.S., M.R.E., Th.D., and Ph.D. in his book "The Collapse of Evolution" has this to say,

"The irony of this whole situation is that the very concept of organic evolution is completely absurd and impossible. It isab- solutely astonishing that an idea which is so devoid of any legit- imate scientific evidence could have attained aposition of such prestige in the name of science." 11

So what is the answer? Easy, just read the first verse of the Bible: "In the beginning God created the heaven and theearth." Creation [sometimes called Creationism] is the only alternative.

FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER ONE

1 Quoted in "Evolution: The Challenge of the Fossil Record" by Dr. Duane T. Gish, Creation-Life Publishers, El Cajon, CAUSA, 1991, p 11. His quote is from original quote found in "Science", T. Dobzhansky, 127:1091 (1958).

2 Quoted in "Evolution: The Challenge of the Fossil Record" , by Dr. DuaneT. Gish, Creation-Life Publishers, El Cajon,CA, USA, 1991, p. 12. His quote is from original quote found in "American Science", R.B. Goldschmidt, 40:84, (1952).

3 Quoted in "Evolution: The Challenge of the Fossil Record" , by Dr. Duane T. Gish, Creation-Life Publishers, El Cajon,CA, USA, 1991, p. 12.

4 Quoted in "Evolution: The Challenge of the Fossil Record", by Dr. Duane T. Gish, Creation-Life Publishers, El Cajon,CA, USA, 1991, p. 13.

5 Ibid. p. 13.

6 Ibid. p. 14.


8 "The Natural Sciences Know Nothing of Evolution", by A. E. Wilder-Smith, Master Books, A Division of CLP Publishers,San Diego, CA, USA, 1981, p. viii.


10 Quoted in "Evolution: The Challenge of the Fossil Record", by Dr. Duane T. Gish, Creation-Life Publishers, El Cajon,CA, USA, 1991, p. 18. Originally quoted by T. Dobzhansky in his, "Evolution", Vol. 29, p. 376, 1975.

11 Scott M. Huse, "The Collapse of Evolution", Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, MI, USA, 1991, p. 2 of preface.

Return to top

CHAPTER TWO

A LOOK AT THE UNIVERSE

Albert Einstein said,

"Everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of theuniverse - a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with modest powers must feel humble." 1

Immanuel Kant, the noted Philosopher said,


6/25

"In the world everywhere we find clear signs of an order which can only spring from design, an order realized with thegreatest wisdom, and in a universe which is indescrib- ably varied in content and in extent, infinite." 2

"If the world's finest minds can unravel only with difficulty the deeper working of nature, how could it be supposed thatthose workings are merely a mindless accident, a product of blind chance?" 3

"Sir Fred Hoyle, British mathematician and astrophysicist, was an atheist for much of his life. In 1981 he published a bookwith Chandra Wickramasinghe entitled, "Evolution from Space". Both Hoyle and Wickramasinghe came to the conclusionthat the high degree of order and specificity in the universe demanded a preexisting intelligence. Said Hoyle and

Wickrasmasinghe, 'Once we see, however that the probability of life origination at random is so utterly minuscule as tomake it absurd, it becomes sensible to think that the favorable properties of physics, on which life depends, are in everyrespect deliberate. It is, therefore almost inevitable that our own measure of intelligence must reflect higher intelligence . .. even to the limit of God'".4

"Astronomers have discovered a gigantic collection of galaxies that they say is the biggest structure ever seen in theuniverse. The structure, which they call The Great Wall, is so difficult to explain that it raises new questions about theorieson origin and structure of the universe. The researchers reported their discovery in Friday's issue of the journal, "Science"

The galaxies that make up The Great Wall form a sheet at least 500 million light-years long,* and it is 200 million light-years wide and 15 million light years thick.

By comparison, the Earth's Milky Way galaxy is 100,000 light-years across.

Ms. Margaret Geller, one of the co-discoverers said, "No one knows of a force [Editor's note: How about God?] that couldhave produced a structure so big in the time since the universe was formed." 5

Then a few months later. . . Astronomers discovered more than a dozen evenly distributed clumps of galaxies stretchingacross vast expanses of the heavens, suggesting a structure to the universe that is so regular and immense that it defiescurrent theories of cosmic creation and evolution!

"Nature" scientists said the newly found pattern of clumped galactic matter, if confirmed by further observations, dwarfsthe long sheet of galaxies, dubbed the 'Great Wall', that was reported last fall to be the largest structure in the universe.

"They were surprised to see so many large clumps and in such a uniform distribution of matter on such a large scale. But

they were astonished to find the clumps so evenly spaced, each either 400 million or 800 million light-years apart.

'The regularity is just mind-boggling,' said Dr. David C. Koo, an astronomer at the University of California at Santa Cruzand one of the authors of the "Nature" report.

It's as if we pierced an extremely narrow needle through the universe and hit one wall after another', said Alexander S.Szalay, an astronomer at John Hopkins University in Baltimore and a member of the discovery team.

'The clumps should be randomly distributed and they're not. that's the biggest surprise.'" 6

Evenly spaced suggests an intelligence created them this way whereas randomly spaced suggests an explosion like theevolutionary example of the Big Bang.

How does this affect evolution theories? Let the evolutionists themselves continue to speak: "In a commentary on thereport, also published in "Nature", Marc Davis, an astrophysicist at the University of California at Berkeley, concluded, 'It issafe to say we understand less than zero about the early universe.'" 7

What he means is that the discovery of the "Great Wall" and a few months later of the other walls, along with theirspacing, means that the planets cannot have come from a 'Big Bang'. He means that the very foundation of evolution iscompletely wrong!

With evolution on the defensive in Europe and America why is it still being taught as fact in Taiwan and other countries ofthe region?


7/25

WHAT ABOUT LIFE ON OTHER PLANETS?

In his book, "Scientific Creationism" the eminent scientist Dr. Henry Morris says,

"Not only has no evidence been found that life has ever evolved elsewhere in the solar system, but all previous theories ofthe evolution of the solar system itself have encountered overwhelming problems as new data have come in."

Creationists, of course, had predicted this all along, on the basis of the creation model. ** For example, some of thedefinite predictions from the creation model are as follows:

1. Since the earth, moon and planets were each created for a specific purpose, each would have a distinctive structure.They would not all be of essentially the same composition and structure, as would be the case if they had all evolvedtogether from a common source.

2. Only the earth would be found to have a hydrosphere capable of supporting life as we know it.

3. Only the earth would be found to have an atmosphere capable of supporting life as we know it.

4. Evidence would be found of decay and catastrophism on other planets and moons, but not of evolutionary growth inorder and complexity.

All of these predictions have been clearly confirmed by the moon landings and by the probes to the various planets andtheir satellites. Although some scientists still cling to the hope that evidence might yet be found which would support theexistence of life in the distant past or distant future on one of these planets, the fact is that no such evidence has beenfound.

None of the planets has any measurable amount of liquid water and not one has an oxygen atmosphere, both of whichare ab- solute essentials for life as we know it.

Clearly the widely published photographs of the moon's surface, as well as of Mars, show signs of past deterioration, evenof a catastrophic nature, from whatever their original forms may have been. The asteroid fragments, meteors andmeteorites breaking up, and decaying comets all add their testimony of catastrophism and deterioration. Nowhere in theentire solar system is found any evidence at all of a building process, either of the planetary bodies themselves or of thecomplexity of the chemical and phy- sical systems that are found on them.

Finally, the moon landings have permitted man actually to study the composition and structure of some of the materialsfrom at least one extraterrestrial body. Enough has been found to permit the firm conclusion that the earth and its moonare of vastly different structure and therefore could not have the same celestial evolutionary 'ancestor.'"8

"To the surprise of scientists, the chemical makeup of the moon rocks is distinctly different from that of rocks on earth.This difference implies that the moon formed under different conditions, . . . and means that any theory on the origin of theplanets now will have to create the earth and the moon in different ways." 9

This important discovery should be taught in the classrooms. The moon and the earth have different structures andtherefore different origins!

IS THE EARTH OLD OR YOUNG?

The fact that erroneous results can be and often are derived from dating techniques has been experimentally verified. Forexample, living snails have been dated as 2,300 years old by the carbon-14 method. 10 Wood taken from growing treeshas been dated by the carbon-14 method to be 10,000 years old. 11 Hawaiian lava flows which are known to be less than200 years old, have been dated by the potassium-argon method at up to 3 billion years old! 12

In his book, "The Collapse of Evolution", Dr. Scott M. Huse says,

"Considering the unreliability of these dating techniques, there is no valid scientific reason why one should place any conf-idence in them especially since there is such an immense amount of extrapolation involved. Consequently, we will notconsider other process which can also be used to measure time and thus date the earth." 13


8/25

Dr. Huse continues,

"A significant amount of research has been accumulated which suggests that the earth and solar system are relativelyyoung and not ancient as evolutionists have assumed. The next two processes are usually selectively screened out byevolutionists, who choose to ignore or discard them, because they indicate a relatively young age for the earth and solarsystem."

The Earth's Magnetic Field

The strength of the earth's magnetic field has been measured for well over a century. This provides scientists withexception- ally good records. In an important recent study, Dr. Thomas G. Barnew has shown that the strength of theearth's magnetic field is decaying exponentially at a rate corresponding to a half-life of 1,400 years. That is to say, 1,400years ago the magnetic field of the earth was twice as strong as it is now. If we extrapolate back as far as 10,000 years,we find that the earth would have had a magnetic field as strong as that of a magnetic star!

This is, of course, highly improbable, if not impossible. Thus, based on the present decay of the earth's magnetic field,10,000 years appears to be an upper limit for the age of the earth.

Finally evolutionists believe that the earth's magnetic field is due to circulating electric currents in its core. If weextrapolate back- ward about 20,000 years, we find that the estimated heat produced by the currents would have meltedthe earth. Clearly, the testimony of the earth's magnetic field is strongly in favor of a relatively young earth, not anancient one." 14

Meteoritic Dust And The Age Of The Earth

On the subject of meteoritic dust Dr. Huse says,

"Scientists have known for some time now that cosmic dust particles enter the earth's atmosphere from space at anessentially constant rate. Eventually these dust particles settle down to the earth's surface. Hans Petterson has madeaccurate measurements of this influx, and has determined that the earth receives about 10 million tons per year. Now, if itis true that the earth is around 5 billions years old, as evolutionists insist, there should be a layer of meteoritic dust that isabout 182 feet thick all over the world! No such dust layer exists anywhere, of course. Even on the moon where it shouldat least be this thick, little sign of it was found by the astronauts (about 1/8 of an inch). The fear that the astronauts wouldsink into such a layer of meteoritic dust over 20 feet deep when they landed on the moon proved to be com- pletelyunwarranted.

Evolutionary geologists might be tempted to argue that erosion- al and mixing processes can account for the absence ofthe meteoritic dust layer. However, this explanation is unsatisfac- tory. It is easily refuted because the composition ofmeteoritic dust is very distinctive, particularly in its content of nickel and iron. For example, nickel is a very rare element inthe earth's crust and even more scarce in the ocean. But the average nickel content of meteoritic dust is approximately300 times as great as in the earth's crust! Calculations based on the relatively small amount of nickel found in the earth'scrust and ocean indicate an age for the earth of only a few thousand years." 15

A further blow to the dating techniques was presented by Dr. John L. Anderson at the 161th American Chemical Societymeeting in Los Angeles, CA , USA. He provided information from established experiments that showed the Carbon-14decay rate actually could have varied in the past to such an extent as to render the ages invalid!

Petroleum And Natural Gas

Petroleum and natural gas are contained at high pressures in underground reservoirs by relatively impermeable cap rock.In many cases, the pressures are extremely high. Calculations based upon the measured pressures could not bemaintained for much longer than 10,000 years in many instances. Thus, the generalization that such fossil-fuel depositshave been confined for millions of years, have not leaked out through their cap rock, is preposterous. 16

Furthermore, recent experiments have demonstrated conclusively that the conversion of marine and vegetal matter into oiand gas can be achieved in a surprisingly short time. For example, plant-derived material has been converted into a goodgrade of petroleum in as little as 20 minutes under the proper temperature and pressure conditions. Wood and othercellulosic material have also been converted into coal-like substances in just a few hours. These experiments prove thatthe formation of coal, oil, and gas did not necessarily require millions of years to form as evolutionary geologists have


9/25

assumed and taught.17 That is the problem with the evolutionists. They have built their house upon completeassumptions!

We creationists believe that the great coal deposits of the world are the remains of the world after being destroyed by theflood in the days of Noah. This catastrophic interpretation is further supported by the presence of polystrata fossils*** inthe coal beds which indicate rapid formation. Also, the type of plants involved and the texture of these deposits testify ofturbulent waters, not a stagnant swamp.

Evolutionists propose that coal was formed millions of years before man evolved. However, human skeletons and

artifacts, such as intricately structured gold chains, have been found in coal deposits. In Genesis 4 we learn that metalworking was already highly developed. The flood of Noah's time buried the world in the layers of mud that later becamethe top-most rocks of the earth's outer crust.

Then there are the fissures found in many areas of the world where animals from dry climates, wet tropical forests, andcold areas are all buried together. Only water could have transported the many thousands there to be deposited for us tofind later. Even Woolly Mammoths, Saber Toothed Tigers, and Human have been found together in crevices of themountains as if they were fleeing to higher ground!

Or what of the Mammoths that were found by the millions that were so suddenly frozen that some still had their tonguesout with the vegetation still on it and not damaged, except for being suddenly frozen! Even the hair, skin, and foodundigested in the stomachs. What clamity could have frozen them so suddenly? Most of them so suddenly frozen thatthey were left still standing! How about the earth titling suddenly under the weight of the water of Noah's time? Isn't the

earth still tilted? The Age Of The Earth By Looking At Our Population Evolutionists believe that mankind has been on theearth for at least one million years. Creationists believe that mankind has been here for about 6,000 years. So whichpossibility is true? Dr. Huse continues,

"Dr. Henry M. Morris has calculated that an average growth of only 1/2% per year, which is 1/4 of the actual rate, wouldyield the present population in just 4,000 years. This allows ample room for periods of time when, because of war ordisease, the population growth rates were far below the normal averages. Dr. Morris points out that it is statisticallyinconceivable that the present population could have resulted from one million years of evolutionary history. Even if thepopulation increased at only 1/2 % per year for a million years, the number of people in the present generation wouldexceed 10 to the 2,100th power! To further appreciate the utter absurdness of the evolution model you need to know thatonly 10 to the 130th power electrons can be packed into the entire known universe!" 18

This, of course, is an utter impossibility. Evolution is again proven to be false! Just because people believe in something

does not make it true. Facts do not lie, but people do!

The Rotation Of The Earth

The rotation of the earth is gradually slowing due to the gravitational drag forces of the sun, moon, and other factors. If theearth is billions of years old, as evolutionary geologists insist, and it has been slowing down uniformly, then its presentrotation should be zero! Furthermore, if we extrapolate backwards for several billion years, the centrifugal force wouldhave been so great that the continents would have been sent to the equatorial regions and the overall shape of the earthwould have been a flat pancake. But, as is commonly known, the shape of the earth is spherical; its continents are notconfined to the equatorial regions, and it continues to rotate on its axis at approximately 1,000 miles per hour at theequator. The obvious conclusion is that the earth is not billions of years old, but only a few thousand! Evolution, wrongagain! 19

As more and more evidence is gained about the universe the evolutionists involved in acquiring this information aredropping their theories of evolution. Dr. Sir Fred Hoyle has dropped his own widely-believed theory and, although not aChristian, does believe in God. The leaders have all dropped the big-Bang theory. So where are evolution's leaders now?They are there, but they are keeping very quiet as they try to figure out another way to get around the judgment of Godupon sin in this world!

FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER TWO

1 "Journal", A publication of Summit ministries, March 1989, P.O. Box 207, Manitou Springs, CO, USA, p.2.


10/25

2 "Journal", 1989, p. 2.

3 Ibid. p. 2.

4 Ibid. p. 2.

5 "Associated Press", November 18, 1989.

6 Ibid.

7 Ibid.

8 Dr. Henry Morris, "Scientific Creationism", Master Books, P. O. Box 1606, El Cajon, CA., USA , 92022, pp. 79-80.

9 Jerry E. Bishop, "New Theories of Creation", "Science Digest", Vol. 72 (October 1972), p. 42.

10 Keith and Anderson, "Radiocarbon Dating: Fictitious Results with Mollusk Shells," "Science", Vol. 141, 1963, p. 634.

11 B. Huber, "Recording Gaseous Exchange Under Field Conditions, " "The Physiology of Forest Trees", RonaldPublishers, New York, 1958.

12 W.E. Lammerts, "Why Not Creation?", Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1973, p. 338.

13 Dr. Scott M. Huse, "The Collapse of Evolution", Baker Book House Company, Grand Rapids, MI, USA 1991, p. 20.

14 Ibib. p. 21-22.

15 Ibid. p. 22-23.

16 Dr. R. E. Kofahl, "Handy Dandy Evolution Refuter", Beta Books, San Diego, California, 1977, p. 27.

17 Dr. Henry M. Morris, Dr. Duane T. Gish, and Dr. George M. Hillestand, "Creation: Acts, Facts, Impacts", Creation-LifePublishers, San Diego, CA, USA , 1974, p. 188.

18 Scott M. Huse, Op.cit. p. 28.

19 R. L. Wysong, "The Creation-Evolution Controversy", Inquiry Press, Midland, MI, USA 1981, p. 300-301.

* To understand how huge this wall is you must realize that light travels at the speed of 186,282.397 [299,792.458kilometers] miles per second. To better understand this extraordinary speed you need to realize that light would travelaround the world 7.451 times in only one second! At this speed light would travel 11,176,943.82 miles [18,140,179.819kilometers] in only one minute! In one hour light would travel 670,616,629 miles [1,088,410,789 kilometers]! In one daylight travels 16,094,799,096 miles [26,121,858,932.8 kilometers]. By now the size of this Great Wall is beginning tobecome too much for our comprehension even though we can see and measure it! If you were 20 years old and couldtravel from one end of The Great Wall to the other at the speed of light, and you started on January first 1995, by the endof the first year you would have traveled 5,874,601,660,180 miles [9,535,478,494,472.14 kilometers - This is exactly234,984,066.4 trips around the world in just the first year!] For you to travel the length of this wall at the speed of light, youwould need to live an additional 499,999,999 years of life! Read on, because a few months later astronomers discovereda series of walls, evenly spaced one behind the other, and so big that they make The Great Wall look small!

** God placed humans on only one planet and this planet is the only one capable of supporting life as we know it.

*** Polystrata fossils are usually trees that are standing up or even sometimes up-side-down through millions of years ofdifferent rock layers [Strata] or coal. Did they live for this long or did a flood pour tons of mud around them which later,under great pressure, formed rocks? Of course, they did not live this long, so the Geological column is completely wrong!

Return to top


11/25

CHAPTER III

MONKEY BUSINESS!

What fool would think that his ancestors were monkeys? I remember seeing a cartoon in a magazine or newspaper onceof two monkeys in a tree looking down at two queer fags boogering each other. One monkey looked over to the other oneand said, "Even we will not do that." So where does this put the queer in the evolutionary chain? What he does is

degenerative, not normal, and perverse! God's creation was not Adam and Steve, but Adam and Eve. Monkeys will not dothings that are unnatural!

Although the primates are supposed to have evolved from an insectivorous ancestor, there are no series of transitionalforms connecting primates to insectivores. Elwyn Simons, one of the world's leading experts in the field of primates, mustadmit that, "In spite of recent finds, the time and place of origin of order primates remains shrouded in mystery." 1

We can see, at the very outset that, according to evolutionists, the true origin of the man cannot be discovered or found inthe fossil record.

Since it cannot be proven, then what are all of these monkey men doing standing in the science museums of the world?Well, I will tell you the truth. They are all the figments of evolutionists' imaginations. For example how can you make amonkey man from a pig's tooth? Well, if you were the evolutionist that concocted Nebraska Man you could. Not only did ascientist [?] construct the complete skeleton from a pig's tooth, but he actually put meat, facial features, muscle, and hairon the skeleton. The same thing as is in your local museum. Yes, all untrue. Lies, made up lies.

According to evolutionists the South American or New World monkeys gave rise to the Old World monkeys. Then the OldWorld monkeys gave rise to the ape and man. But there are no transitional forms between the South American monkeysand their presumed ancestors. Thus the evolutionist A. S. Romer has to agree by stating,

"Little is known, unfortunately, of the fossil history of the South American monkeys," 2

"When these animals first appear in the fossil record they are just what they are today - monkeys!" 3

* "When Romer is asked to give his opinion of the origin of the chimpanzee and gorilla he says,

'Our knowledge of the fossil history of these higher apes and of presumed human ancestors on this level is tantalizingpoor.'"

"What can anthropologists say about man's ultimate origin from his imagined ape-like ancestor? Pilbeam says,

'It has come to be rather generally assumed, albeit in a rather vague fashion, the pre-Pleistocene hominid ancestry wasrooted somewhere in the Dryopithecinae.'"

When a scientist is forced to 'assume' something 'in a rather vague fashion,' it is obvious that he is resorting to whollyunscientific methods to establish what he cannot do by the usual accepted scientific method."

Most people should know is that anthropologists and paleontologists are subject to the same desires for fame as the restof us. They can lie, cheat, steal, even murder [As in the case of Dr. Dian Fossey by her colleage in order to steal herresearch material to claim as his own], and steal another's research in order to gain fame!

With this in mind let us deal with some of the more famous instances of the products of lies.

Java Man

"A Dutch physician by the name of Dubois became convinced that the "missing link" in man's evolutionary origin would befound in the East Indies. He joined the Dutch army and got an assignment to Java, where he began his search. In 1891,along the bank of the Solo River near the village of Trinil, he found a skull-cap. The skull-cap had a very low sloping


12/25

forehead with heavy brow ridges. The cranial capacity was estimated by Dubois to be about 900 cc, about 2/3 of that formodern man, but it is impossible to determine cranial capacity from a skull-cap alone.

About a year later and 50 feet from where he had found the skull-cap, Dubois found a human thigh bone. Duboisassumed, without any real justification, that the skull-cap and human thigh bone were from the same individual. He placedthem together and called the association Pithecanthropus erectus [erect ape-man]. At about the same time Dubois foundtwo molar teeth which he included in his original announcement. In 1898 he discovered a tooth which he believed shouldalso be included with the first finds. The collection came to be know as Java Man. Evolutionists have estimated the age ofthe fossils to be about 500,000 years old.

Dubois exhibited these fossils at the International Congress of Zoology at Leyden in 1895 [Now he has fame, right?].Authorities greeted Dubois' f ind with considerable skepticism and divided opinion. British zoologists tended to view theremains as human, the Germans as those of an ape, and the French as those of something between ape and man.

What they all did not know is that Dubois had concealed the fact that he had also discovered at nearby Wadjak and atapproximately the same level, two human skulls [Know as the Wadjak skulls] with a cranial capacity of about 1550-1600cc, somewhat above the present human average. To have revealed this fact at that time would have rendered it difficult, ifnot impossible, for his Java Man to have been accepted as a "missing link". It was not until 1922 when a similar discoverywas about to be announced, that Dubois revealed that he had possessed the Wadjak skulls for over 30 years! His failureto reveal this find to the scientific world can only be considered as an act of dishonesty and calculated to obtainacceptance of Pithecanthropus as an ape-man.

Before his death, but after he had convinced most evolutionists as to the man-like affinity of Pithecanthropus, Duboisdeclared that his Java Man was nothing more than a large gibbon!" He admitted he had lied and cheated to gain fame andmake money! Java Man was a complete hoax! Are you still taught that Java Man was in man's evolutionary history? Youare being taught something that the inventor of which said, over 72 years ago, was a lie! Now to the Chinese people'sclaim to fame. [?]

Peking Man

"If one accepts uncritically the evidence usually present in books on Peking Man, the case for the existence of near-man,or ape-man would seem to be established. For example the skull model and flesh reconstructions based on this modelreveal a remarkable resemblance to modern man and could hardly be called anything less that human. But a closeexamination of the reports related to Peking Man, however reveal a tangled web of contradictions, highly subjectivetreatment of the data, a peculiar and unnatural condition of the fossil bones, and the loss of essentially all of the fossil

material. If you went into a court of law without any evidence would you win or loose? Peking Man's fossils havedisappeared and probably because the fraud was close to being found out!

At Choukoutien, about 25 miles from Peking, China, in the 1920's and 1930's, were found fragments of about 30 skulls, 11mandibles [lower jaws] and about 147 teeth. Except for a very few and highly fragmentary remains of limb bones, nothingelse from these creatures were found. One of the initial finds was a single tooth, and without waiting for any furtherevidence, Dr. Davidson Black, Professor of Anatomy at Union Medical College, Peking, declared that this toothestablished evidence for the existence of an ancient man-like creature, in China. Since he had made the claim for amissing link from one tooth is there any doubt that he would find nothing but missing links in further digging? How can aman, no matter how great, declare, on the evidence of only one tooth, that he had found a missing link in the evolutionaryorigin of mankind?

Later all evidence [?] for Peking Man disappeared. Nothing remains today. Someone destroyed it. The only ones that had

control of it were the evolutionists. Why would they destroy their own evidence....unless it had been fabricated!

We will now look at what Dr. Patrick O'Connell had to say about the Peking man. He was in China during all of the timethe excavations at Choukoutien were being carried out, including the Japanese occupation and for several years after theJapanese departure. He became convinced that the public had not been given all of the facts and that no "missing link"had been found at Choukoutien. He published his conclusions in his book, "Science of Today and the Problems ofGenesis". O'Connell believes the disappearance of Peking Man's remains was by design rather than by accident of war.The Japanese did not interfere with the work at Choukoutien, and Weidenreich and Pei continued the excavations untilWeidenreich left in 1940. O'Connell believes that Pei may have destroyed the fossils before the Chinese governmentreturned to Peking in order to conceal the fact that the plaster models of Peking Man did not correspond to the actualdetails of the fossils!"


13/25

When a display was organized in 1954 in China on the bones, animals, etc. found at Choukoutien only the Peking Manwas missing!

"In his book O'Connell points out that little attention has been paid to the fossil remains of 10 modern humans found at thesame exact site!

After finding ape skulls, Davidson Black claimed to have found the rest of the ape-man, but descriptions of the partialskulls found and later clay models differed very much.

Teilhard de Chardin said, 'Peking Man resembles the great apes closely.' " So what is the difference?

By 1936 instead of being like an ape they have changed to look very human. What we have here is a slow changing of theway the Peking Man actually looked and by 1936 he is what you see today in the Science Museums of the world. The onlyevolution was from the first tooth until 1936! Tsk, tsk! Pure fabrication on the part of the paleontologists!

"O'Connell concludes that Peking Man consisted of skulls of either large monkeys or baboons killed and eaten by workersat an ancient quarry. There does seem to be considerable evidence that a lime-burning site was buried under rock anddebris at Choukoutien. Whether monkey or baboon skulls, they were monkey-like according to Boule. Boule and othershad leaned toward the belief that Peking Man had been killed and eaten by true man. O'Connell terms the representationof Peking Man, "as a near-man", an outright fraud. We believe at the very least a combination of prejudice, preconceivedideas, and a zeal for fame have been responsible for the elevating of a monkey to the status of an ape-like man. This isthe same combination that produced Nebraska Man from a pig's tooth, Piltdown Man from a modern ape's jaw, and

Leakey's East African Ape-Man from a Southern Ape!"4

Nebraska Man

About the same time as the Peking Man was produced you have the Nebraska Man and the Piltdown man.

In 1922, a tooth was discovered in western Nebraska, USA which was declared by Henry Fairfield Osborn to be themissing link. Dr. Osborn was one of the most eminent paleontologists of that day!

Dr. Osborn and his colleagues could not decide whether the original owner of this tooth should be designated as an ape-like man or a man-like ape. He was commonly called Nebraska Man. These paleontologists then took the one tooth andbuilt a jaw, then built a skull, then a complete skeleton. They then placed facial features and put the meat upon the thing

and in the "London Illustrated News" showed him looking very similar to modern man. In 1927 after further collecting andstudies had been carried out, it was decided that Nebraska Man was neither a ape-like man or a man-like ape, but a pig!Yes, these dummies had taken a pig's tooth and constructed a complete man! Tsk, tsk!

Piltdown Man

In 1912, Arthur Smith Woodward, Director of the British Museum, and Charles Dawson, a medical doctor and amateurpaleontologist, announced the discovery of a lower jaw and part of a skull. Dawson had recovered these specimens froma gravel pit near Piltdown, England. The jawbone appeared very ape-like except for the teeth, which seemed to show thetype of wear expected for humans rather than that for apes. The skull, on the other hand, appeared to very man-like.

He was named Dawn Man, but became popularly know as Piltdown Man. He was judged to be about 500,000 years old.Although a few experts, such as Boule and Henry Fairfield Osborn, objected to the association of this very ape-like jaw

with a human-like skull, the consensus of the world's greatest authorities was that Piltdown Man was indeed an authenticlink in the evolution of man.

However, by 1950 a method had become available for sometimes determining age to some fossil bones. This method isdependent on the amount of fluoride absorbed by bones from the soil. When the Piltdown Man bones were tested it wasdiscovered that the jawbone contained practically no fluoride and thus was no fossil at all. It was hardly older than the dayit was found! The skull did have some fluoride and it was judged to be a few thousand years old, not the 500,000 aspreviously stated!

With this beginning to look like a fraud a more critical examination was performed upon the bones. It was discovered thatthe bones had been treated with iron salts to make them look old, and scratch marks were detected on the teeth,indicating that they had been filed! In other words, Piltdown Man was a complete fraud! A modern ape's jaw and a human


14/25

skull had been made to resemble an ape-man, and the forgery has succeeded in fooling most of the world's greatestexperts.

According to M. Bowden,

". . . and the person responsible for placing the faked fossils in the pit at Piltdown was Teihard de Chardin S.J.." 5

Teilhard was the author of several philosophy books and placed the evidence to help evolution. Philosophy teachers arewell known to believe and promote the cult of evolution.

You should know that the Piltdown Man was viewed in stately museums and studied in major textbooks for severalgenerations. What will today's "Facts" of human evolution turn out to be in the near future? Proven to be more lies frompeople faking evidence in order to gain fame and riches for themselves!

This demonstrates that many modern scientists are prone to find what they want to find even when it is not there!

Neanderthal Man

Neanderthal Man was first discovered over a century ago in a cave in the Neanderthal Valley near Dusseldorf, Germany.He was portrayed as a semi-erect brutish sub-human. Later as scientific techniques improved it was discovered that hewas quite human with a cranial capacity even exceeding that of the normal modern man and stooped over due to arthritis.

He was a human and if walking down the street today in a business suit would not be given any special attention.

F. Lucy

The credit for this discovery [?] goes to D.C. Johanson. His team discovered 40% of a skeleton during digging from 1972to 1977 in Ethiopia. She was said to be a missing link. The "National Geographic" magazine paid for the research andthus got the publicity from the digging, and said in an article, by Johanson, in Dec. 1977:

"The angle of the thigh bone and the flattened surface at its knee joint end . . . proved she walked on two legs."

What you were not told is that the knee joint end of the femur was severely crushed; therefore, Johanson's conclusion ispure speculation; guess work! Anatomist Charles Onard, using a computer technique for analysis of skeletal relationships,has concluded that Lucy did not walk upright, as least not in the same manner as humans. In this connection, it should be

mentioned that the chimpanzee spends a considerable amount of time walking upright. Thus, there is no valid scientificbasis for a conclusion that Lucy was anything more than some kind of monkey or chimpanzee!

Lucy has other problems:

1. Almost all of the evolutionists that investigated the 40% skeleton have changed their minds at least once or moretimes!

2. No one has yet found a skeleton that had a skull! Yes, parts from different areas of the dig were put together toform Lucy! She was not found with a skull that could definitely be said to be her own. How many of the tribes doyou think ate and killed monkeys? This alone would disqualify this find from being given any serious accreditationbecause of the monkey skeletons laying around.

3. Drs. Stern and Susman point out the many ape-like features of Lucy such as: A. The hands and feet. B. Theheavy muscled foot with the proper curve needed for climbing. C. Long curved hands with heavy muscles needed

for climbing and living in trees. D. The angle of the shoulder blades showing that the muscles were attached insuch a way as you would find in a tree dwelling monkey. E. The shape and angularity of the pelvic bone showsthe animal to be ape, not human. 6

Question: What walks like a monkey, has heavy muscled curved hands and feet like a monkey, has shoulder blades likea monkey, and a pelvic angle showing that it lived in trees like monkeys? Well, if you are an evolutionist you might thinkman! Tsk, tsk! Come on, there must be a limit to how stupid a person can be!

Richard Leakey and His Lake Turkana Specimens

His parents, both of whom earned doctorates, were famous evolutionists very well known to the scientific world. Hisfather, Louis became famous for his excavations in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania. His great fame came from finding a


15/25

skull, which he claimed was of a human ancestor and was 2,000,000 years old! Later Louis Leakey, himself,acknowledged the skull was that of a gibbon, not a man after all. Nor was it nearly 2 million years old. Other finds in thesame strata were carbon dated to a few thousand years old, not exceeding 10,000 years. Time Magazine was one placeDr. Leakey admitted that his finds were wrong, but a film had been made and was shown at least twice in the UnitedStates still making the original false claims. Yes, even after the discoverer admitted it was all untrue.

Richard Leakey, though, only got fame through a series of skulls and partial skeletons that his team found, though not hehimself, in the area of Lake Turkana, in Kenya, just south of the Ethiopian border from 1972 through 1978. Leakey neverwent to college let alone earned any kind of degree. His fame came on the find of another man, Bernard Ngeneo, one of

the Kenyans in Leakey's team.

His find, like all of the others before it, have now been scientifically laid in the grave beside the other false claims.

For example:

1. He had now learned how to move quickly to fame by using the mass media. The media wants to sell newspapersand T.V. time slots to advertisers. The only way to get people to watch is to come up with something new. As innew programs every year or so. He called a press conference and made unfounded statements without anyscientific investigation having been done at all. Now he was famous!

2. Afterwards when given time to examine the fossils Drs. Charles Oxnard and F. Peter Lisowski found that: A. Thereconstruction of the foot bones had been done in such a way as to make them look like they belonged to ahuman, when they actually did not fit together well until they were moved into their proper positions and then were

found to be those of a monkey!

Since the evolutionists all say that man's earliest ancestors were on the earth about 2 to 3 million years ago, what do youdo when you find a perfectly preserved human skull, footprints, and sandal prints in rock that the evolutionists claim is7,000,000 years old[ The Pliocene age]. What do you think they did? They covered up the truth and tried to keep it frombeing printed! Liars! Better yet, what do you think the evolutionists did when they found sandal prints, footprints andhuman forged iron bands in Cambrian rock [Which is supposed to be 600 million years old, according to them!]? After all,this is, according to evolutionists, 597 million years before man was on the earth! They tried to keep the information fromgoing public. If you were honest you would realize that the way the evolutionists date things is wrong and that man anddinosaur were living together as recently as 4,000 years ago [The time of the worldwide flood]!

The Plant World [Botany]

Since there is more plant life than human life upon the earth, and if evolution is correct, there should be intermediateforms between the plants. Yes, missing links in the plant world. That should be easy to find.

With all of this in mind concerning the lies and frauds that have been committed what would an honest botanicalevolutionist say? Professor E. J. H. Corner of the Cambridge University botany school said,

"But I still think that to be unprejudiced, the fossil record of plants is in favor of special creation." 6

There you have it. An eminent evolutionist saying that God created everything!

In their book on the principles of paleontology, the two evolutionists, Raup and Stanley say,

"Unfortunately, the origins of most higher categories are shrouded in mystery; commonly new higher categories appearabruptly in the fossil record without evidence of transitional forms." 7

What he means is that he does not find any missing links in the plant world. The plants just suddenly appear! They did notevolve!

DuNouy, another evolutionist, has described the evidence in this way,

"In brief, each group, order, or family seems to be born suddenly and we hardly ever find the forms which link them to thepreced- ing strain. When we discover them they are already completely differentiated. Not only do we find practically notransitional forms, but in general it is impossible to authentically connect a new group with an ancient one." 8


16/25

Dr. Olson said,

"A third fundamental aspect of the record is somewhat different. Many new groups of plants and animals suddenly appearapparently without any close ancestors. Most major groups of organisms and even classes have appeared in this way . . .The fossil record which has produced the problem, is not much help in its solution . . . . Most zoologists and the majority ofpaleontologists feel that the breaks and the abrupt appearances of new groups can be explained by the incompleteness ofthe record, but some disagree and believe that theses events tell a story not in accord with the theory [of evolution] andnot seen among living organisms." 9

These are plain admissions that the missing links in plants life, animal life, and human life cannot be found. Especiallyadmitting, that everything suddenly appeared; that the more fossils they find the more questions arise about theirevolutionary theory. Instead of finding answers they find more problems with their theory! This means the more that theyfind, the more proof they find for creation by design! Yes, looks like the Bible is right when it states that God created alllife! Evolution is a cruel hoax!

They even admit again that they cannot find any missing links for any of the animal life forms. The famous evolutionist, DrClark says,

"No matter how far back we go in the fossil record or previous animal life upon earth, we find no trace of any animal formswhich are intermediate betwen the various major groups." 10

Later on in the same book he says,

"Since we have not the slightest evidence, either among the living or the fossil animals, of any intergrading types followingthe major groups, it is a fair supposition that there never have been any such intergrading types."

Even the famous horse series commonly shown in some science museums is false. In 1993 evolutionists publiclyadmitted that the many small horses were not one group evolving upward into larger sized horses, but were all along,different families of horses! This is admitted years before by the evolutionists when Dr. Du- Nouy, one of their leadingspokesmen says,

"We find that the transitional forms between major types are missing. Each one of these intermediaries seems to haveappeared suddenly, and it has not yet been possible, because of the lack of fossils, to reconstitute the passage betweenthese intermediaries.......The continuity, we surmise, may never be established by facts." 11

To make up for the total lack of evidence in the fossil record for transitional forms [Intermediates, missing links] someevolutionists have went so far, as to be crazy, by saying that since new types suddenly appear, without any missing links,maybe a dinosaur laid an egg and a bird hatched from it instead of evolving! The height of stupidity at work is when amodern evolutionist tries to think up ways to justify his position when all the evidence in the fossil records point to asudden creation of all animal and plant life!

The major predictions by the creationists were:

1. The abrupt appearance of highly complex and diverse forms of life with no evidence of ancestral forms.2. The sudden appearance of basic plant and animal kinds or the "created kinds" of Genesis, without evidence of

transitional forms between the basic kinds.

The fossil record reveals:

1. The abrupt appearance of a great variety of highly complex forms of life. No evolutionary evidence for ancestorsfor these animals can be found anywhere on the earth.

2. The sudden appearance of higher categories of plants and animals with no evidence of transitional formsbetween these basic kinds.

Not only does the fossil record provide excellent evidence for special creation [God creating everything as the Bible says],but the fossil record, at the same time, shows that evolution could not possibly have occurred! I will close this chapterquoting from Kerkut, who is not a creationist. He says,


17/25

"There is a theory that all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from aninorganic form. This theory can be called the 'General Theory of Ev- olution' and the evidence that supports it is notsufficiently strong to allow us to consider it as anything more than a working hypothesis." 12

It is difficult to add anything to that: plainly admitting that evolution does not even rate enough to be a theory let-alone afact!

Here we have it from the mouths of the evolutionists themselves; admitting that evolution cannot be proven and someeven saying that special creation [God creating] has the most evidence!

Question: What do you get when you cross a donkey with a rock? An evolutionists with the stubbornness of a jackassand the intelligence of a rock! Tsk, Tsk.

Question: If you believe something that cannot be proven, isn't that faith? Doesn't faith constitute a religion or a cult?

FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER III

1 E. L. Simons, "Annals New York Academy of Sciences", (1969), Vol. 167, p. 319.

2 A. S. Romer "Vertebrate Paleontology", 3rd edition 1966, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA p. 221.

3 Dr. Duane T. Gish, "Evolution: The Fossils Say No", Creation-Life Publishers, San Diego, CA, USA , 1977, p. 74.

4 Dr. Duane T. Gish, "Evolution: The Fossils Say No" Creation-Life Publishers, San Diego, CA, USA 1977 pp. 88-103

5 Dr. Duane T. Gish, "Evolution: The Challenge of the Fossil Record", Creation-Life Publishers, El Cajon, California, USA,1991, pp. 157-159.

6 E.J.H. Corner, "Contemporary Botanical Thought", A. M. MacLeod and L.S. Cobley, eds., 1961, Quadrangle Books,Chicago.

7 D. M. Raup and S. M. Stanley, "Principles of Paleontology", 1971, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, p. 306.

8 L. DuNouy, "Human Destiny", The New American Library, 1947, New York, p. 63.

9 Dr. E. C. Olson, "The Evolution of Life", The New American Library, 1965, New York p. 94.

10 A.H. Clark, "The New Evolution: Zoogenesis", 1930, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, USA p. 189.

11 L. DuNouy, op. cit. p. 74.

12 G.A. Kerkut, "Implications of Evolution", Pergamon Press, 1960, New York, p. 157.

* Let the reader know that I will now quote from Dr. Guish's book for a few pages and will put his words in quotes andleave mine without quotes. When the next footnote is noted that will be the end of the information from his book from hereto there.

Return to top

CHAPTER IV

A FEW LAST FACTS


18/25

According to Leakey, and a few others, man has been around about 3 to 10 million years. Most evolutionists [They aredivided in their beliefs.] believe man has been around 1 million years. We will give them the benefit of a doubt [They willcertainly need it] and use Leakey's figure of 3 million years or so.

Evolutionists say that Dinosaurs died out, disappeared, about 65 to 70 million years ago. This means that dinosaurs hadbeen dead at least 62 million years before man's earliest ancestor appeared, if you take Richard Leakey's figures as fact.

Enough proof has already been given in this book to show anyone, who is honest, that evolution is not true, but what ifdinosaurs and humans lived at the same time? If this can be proven then the complete time table, on which evolution is

based, is thrown out, and with it, evolution!

An authentic report came out of Russia, "1500 dinosaur imprints had been found, with what appeared to be humanimprints in the same strata." 1 According to modern evolutionists, man's earliest ancestors were on the earth 62 to 65million years after the dinosaur died! How could the tracks have been found together?

A few miles away from the many dinosaur footprints at Glen Rose, Texas was found a human skeleton of a woman thatwas 210 cm tall [7 foot tall]! 2

Also In a Cretaceous limestone formation near Glen Rose, Texas, are to be found some remarkable footprints. They arethe tracks of giant men! You can go look at them for yourself. [But when you arrive, ask one of the old timers to tell youwhere to look. As soon as they are exposed to the elements, they gradually begin eroding away.]

Glen Rose is located in north central Texas, about 40 miles southwest of the Fort Worth-Dallas metropolitan area. Thearea has little rainfall; and, for several months each year the Paluxy River is completely dry. From time to time the riverchanges its course. This occurs at those times when the quiet river becomes a raging torrent. Because the river has sucha steep slope [a drop of 17 feet -51.8 dm- per mile], it is the second swiftest river in Texas and quite dangerous in time ofheavy rainfall. It was after the terrible flood of 1908, when the river rose 27 feet [82.3 dm], that the prints began to benoticed. The new riverbed brought to view a flat rock bottom with animal and human prints in what was once wet mudwhich had turned to stone.

I, Dr. Ron Powell, the author of this small work, would like to take time out to give you the following very, very, importantinformation and then shall continue. This same information and more was published in "The Great Dinosaur Mistake" inthe early 1990s, but I was somewhat apprehensive about using it in this edition as I did in my original first edition of"Evolution: The Truth?". The present situation with the dinosaur and human tracks now is that the elements or possiblysomeone has changed the human tracks to the degree that they cannot for certain be claimed to be human tracks.

Now though, the reason I have decided to use this information of the finding of dinosaur and human tracks together is thatin searching the internet I came across the same information being discovered and used in another book many decadesbefore Evolution: The Truth? and The Great Dinosaur Mistake were printed! This was an, on the site, personal eyewitness account, [when the tracks were easily identifiable as human], of the Paleontologist and evolutionist Dr. Roland T.Bird!

Now, continuing on: Clifford L. Burdick, a mining geologist, and *Roland T. Bird, a paleontologist with the AmericanMuseum of Natural History, carefully examined and reported on the footprints.

Dr. Bird said, after examining the footprints for himself,

"Yes, they apparently are real enough. Real as the rock could be . . . the strangest things of their kind I had ever seen. Onthe surface of each was splayed the near-likeness of a human foot, perfect in every detail. But each imprint was 15 incheslong!" 3

The present writer is over six feet 1 inch [18.4 dm] tall and has a foot that is 11 inches [27.95 cm] in length. The GlenRose tracks are 15 inches [38.1 cm] long, and were probably made by people 8.3 feet [25.38 dm] tall. During his researchat the Paluxy Riverbed near Glen Rose, Bird found not only human footprints, but also by them trails of large three-toedcarnivorous dinosaurs and the tracks of gigantic sauropods. Each print was 24 x 38 inches [60.9 x 96.5 cm] in size, 12feet [36.57 dm] apart, and sunk deeply into the mud! Both man and dinosaur were apparently running.


19/25

In 1938, under Bird's supervision, a trail of Brontosaurus tracks were taken from the bed and shipped to the AmericanMuseum of Natural History in New York City. C. L. Burdick's findings were published in the spring 1957 issue of "TheNaturalist".

The so-called "Cretaceous Period" is the only time when the dinosaurs were supposed to have lived. It is said to havespanned 70 million years, dating from 135 million to 65 million years ago.

Man is said to have appeared no earlier than 4 million years ago. The "Glen Rose Formation," as it is known bygeologists, is dated as "Early Cretaceous," or 120 million years ago.

This formation is described as limestone, alternating with clay, marl, and sand, and in various shades of brownish yellowand gray. Its thickness is 40 to 200 feet [121.9-602.6 dm].

Preservation of such tracks in limestone provides conclusive proof of rapid formation. As soon as the tracks were made, alayer of clay, sand, and gravel washed in and filled them so they would not dissolve away. Also, if the tracks were notquickly covered they would erode away. There is no room here for hundreds or millions of years. The prints were madeand covered and preserved fast! It may well be that the prints were being covered by rising turbulent water which, aftercovering them with sediments, washed out temporarily as the earth may have moved up or down. It was time of geologiccatastrophe on a massive scale.

Tracks are found in several of the layers of limestone, as they are exposed by river erosion. Man tracks have been foundin layers BELOW that of the dinosaur prints! Fossils from land, seashore, and open sea have all been found here. Human

footprints are found above, with, and below prints of bears, saber-toothed tigers, mammoths, and dinosaurs.

Another striking evidence of the genuineness of these tracks is called "mud push-up." These footprints show "mud up-push" where the toes pushed up the mud in front and on the sides. This would not occur if these were "erosion Markings,"as some evolutionists claim.

Lamination markings, indicating that the foot pressed through different colored clays beneath it, are also to be seen onmany of the human and animal tracks. Over a hundred human footprint trails have been studied in the Paluxy River area.Most of the footprints are unshod, but some appear to have some kind of covering on the foot. Some marks are ofchildren's feet, but always going somewhere with adults. Some are of giants. Each one will have length of strides to matchthe footprint size. Quite a few of the tracks are 16 inches [40.64 cm] in size, but several of the trails are of a man with aseven-foot [21.3 dm] stride and footprint of 21 inch [54.6 cm] tracks by 11.94 foot [36.39 dm] tall people.

C. N. Dougherty, a local chiropractor in the Glen Rose area, wrote a book, Valley of the Giants, in 1967. He has located,described, and photographed many of the human prints. 4

A miner fell through a hole in Italy many years ago and found an 11 ft. 6 inch [348 cm] tall complete, perfectly preservedhuman skeleton. 5 The Bible says in Genesis 6:4,

"There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters ofmen, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown."

These sons of God are fully explained in the introduction to the book, "Biblical Answers for Pentecostals andCharismatics" published in Taiwan Sept. 1994. Ask your local Christian bookstore for a copy. I do believe that they arehere now occassionaly being seen traveling in their U.F.O.s.6

Scientists tell us that Cretaceous rocks are about 135 million years old, but at Glen Rose Texas there has been found aniron hammer with a wooden handle all inside of limestone which is recognized by evolutionists as being 135 millions yearsold! How could the rock have formed around the hammer 135 million years ago? There is a picture of it in the book, TheGreat Dinosaur Mistake.

Answer: Their method of dating is completely wrong and the rock was obviously formed after the hammer was made, nodoubt, under great pressure. Such as water, from a flood, that completely covered the earth. Yes, the same way that ouroil was formed!

And what about the Archaeopteryx? He is claimed to be the earliest ancestor of the birds. This was disproven a few yearsago when in 1977, James Jensen the famous discoverer of the huge dinosaurs called 'Supersaurus' and Ultrasaurus',


20/25

discovered a complete Archaeopteryx, but in the same rock he also discovered the femur of a bird. Simply put, theArchaeopteryx and the bird lived at the same time and the poor bird was probably the last meal of the Archaeopteryx! 7

Index Fossils

"How are geological formations really dated? One method for determining the age of rocks containing fossils is known asthe Index Fossil Method. The type of fossil remains discovered in the geological layer are first examined. Then, accordingto the fossil content of the formation, the age of the rocks are determined. If, for example, dinosaur bones, eggs, orfootprints appear in a geological formation, the geologist assumes that the formation involved orig- inated during the

lifetime of dinosaurs, at least 70 to 120 million years ago.

If a rock formation contains a fossilized trilobite this information must, by the same considerations, be about 300 millionyears old, for trilobites became extinct about 300 million years ago according to evolutionary theory. Consequently, if aformation contains human bones, it must be about 3 million years or so of age because Richard Leakey has said that manearliest ancestors did not live much earlier than this date. This index fossil method is considered by most moderngeologists to be absolutely authoritive." 8

When you ask a geologist how old a certain rock is he will say, "Ah, it has a trilobite fossil in it, so it came from thePennsylvanian period of about 300 million years ago." If you then ask the fossil hunter how old the fossil is he will say,"Ah, it is from Pennsylvanian rock so it is 300 million or so years old." Yes, circular reasoning. What a mess!

Since scientists claim that the last trilobite died about 300 million years ago, it would be impossible to find a trilobite

crushed inside the footprint of a human. After all, I have not seen many 297 million year old trilobites crawling aroundlately? But that is exactly what was found by Dr. Clifford Burdick on Swasey Mountain, west central Utah, at an altitude ofabout 2,000 feet. 9

On the next couple of pages I shall document evidence of human skeletons, leg bones, skulls, and man made objects thathave been found in the different geological time periods all the way back to 600 million years! These prove the geologicaltime column is completely wrong! A lie, made up by men, to further their own false beliefs in their cult religion of evolution!

How could a human skeleton have been found in rock that has been supposedly dated to 500 million years andevolutionary scientists say our earliest ancestors were not alive until 3 million or so years ago? Yes, you have beencheated in one of the greatest frauds in human history! You believed a lie! The devil has a trap and religion [evolution is areligion based on faith] for every one!

Here are human and human made artifacts found in the false "Geological Column" of the evolutionists.10 The Chart: bythe very talented Dr. Carl Weiland, of Adelaide, Australia.

Mid-Pleistocene [4 million years ago]

Human skull found in Olmo, Italy

Human skeleton found in Clichy, France

Human skeleton found in Gary Hill, England

Lower-Pleistocene [5.5 million years ago]

Human pelvis found in Natchez, U.S.A.

Human jaw found in Abbeville, France

Human upper arm bone found in Kanapoi, Africa

Piocene [7 million years ago]

Human skull found in Calveras, California, U.S.A.


21/25

Human skull found in Castenedolo, Italy

Human skull found at Table Mt., California, U.S.A.

Human jaw found at Fox Hall, England

Huma footprints found at Laetolil, Africa

Human footprints found at Tulsa, OK, U.S.A.

Sandal prints found at Carson City, Nevada, U.S.A.

Miocene [26 million years ago]

Human skull found at Stanford, California, U.S.A.

Human jaw found at Tuscany, Italy

Human shoe print found at Gobi Desert in China

Eocene [50 Million years ago]

Human skull found at Germany

Human tooth found at Bear Creek, Montana, U.S.A.

Paleocene [70 million years ago]

A human made cast iron cube found at Wolfsegg, Austria

Jurassic [190 million years ago]

Human leg and footbones found at Spring Valley, Nevada, U.S.A.

Human footprint found at Parkersbury, West Virginia, U.S.A.

Pennsylvanian [310 million years ago]

Human footprints found at Bera, Kentucky, U.S.A.

Human made iron pots found at Oklahoma, U.S.A.

Human made tools found at Aixen-provence, France

Human made gold chain found in Illinois, U.S.A.

Devonian [350 million years ago]

Human footprints found in Missouri, U.S.A.

Precision pattern found at Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Silurian/Ordovician [500 million years ago]

Human skeleton found at Franklin county, Missouri, U.S.A.


22/25

Human sandal prints found at Lake Windermere, England

Human made metal hammer found at London, Texas, U.S.A.

Cambrian [600 million years ago]

Human footprints and sandal prints found at Antelope Springs, Utah, U.S.A.

Human made iron bands found at Lochmaree, Scotland

Man made artifacts and footprints cannot be in rock older than man himself! Obviously evolutionary dating is wrong! Noother conclusion can be drawn! Any honest person could see this because this is a no-brainer.

Another quick example of the error found in the fossil index is of the Coelacanth [Latimeria] fish. This fish was used todate rocks to 70 million years of age, because it was generally recognized that this fish became extinct some 70 millionyears ago. The Coelacanth was regarded as a vital link in the evolution of fish. Well, it was . . . until it was caught byfisherman in 1965 and since then has been caught many more times off of the coasts of Africa and it is identical to thefossilized remains of those previously thought to have been 70 million years old! 10 This shows that the rock andfossilized remains of this fish, previously dated to 70 million years, was in fact, a fish and rock that could only by thewildest stretch of the imagination be dated to a few thousand years! The present geological age! If you believe evolutionyou have believed a lie! It is important to realize that nowhere in the world does the geological column actually occur. Itexists only in the minds of the evolutionary geologists. It is simply an idea, an idea of geological systems, and not anactual column of rocks that can be observed at a particular locality. Even the Grand Canyon includes less than half of thisman-made column. Yes, you have been lied to. Some of you are Christians and you too actually believed the lie. Shameon you for not believing God created everything in seven days.

Deoxyribonucleic Acid [DNA] More complex living things are composed of a tremendous number of specialized cells, andwithin each cell is an intricate complex of specialized protein molecules. Each protein molecule is a particularly organizedstructure composed of about twenty different amino acids, and each amino acid is made up of the four elementshydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon (in two cases a sulfur atom is also present).

These complex systems are all, in the case of every known organism, reproduced and assembled on the basis of the"instructions" already built into the DNA molecular system. DNA is composed of six simple molecules; these consist offour bases, the arrangement of which specifies the message, made up of nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon, alongwith a deoxyribose sugar molecule and a phosphate molecule which hold the bases in place.

The DNA molecular system is so great that not only does it hold the correct information for the synthesis of the specificprotein molecules needed by the cell, but also that are needed for its own duplication forever!

On paper, using our alphabet system, this human genetic information on one human zygote would fill over 1,000 volumeseach of 500 pages, a total of 500,000 printed pages. And all 500,000 printed pages enclosed in a thing as small as a grainof dust! The zygote is a masterpiece of miniaturized information, storage, and retrieval. One such zygot contains all of thenecessary information required to build an entire human being and also that is required to synthesize all of his offspringforever!

MATHEMATICS

"The probability of being struck by lightening is 1 in 600,000. That is one out of every 600,000 people will be hit bylightening, although they may not die, they will be struck! So you can rest assured that you probably will not be struck bylightening. The mathematical probability of a monkey striking a typewriter and typing out the correct spelling for the word"EVOLUTION" is one in 25,429,503,680,000 chances. Your chances are 42,382,505 times more likely to be hit bylightening!

Consider taking 20 cards numbered from 1 to 20 and ask the monkey to lay them out in order. The chances of thishappening are 1 in 2,243,902,008,176,640,000. The probability of accidentally typing out Genesis 1:1 is 181, 479, 392 tothe 54th power . The probability of typing out 200 letters all in a desired order. This is getting to be compared to livingthings. The chances of this happening are 1 in 10 to the 375th power on the first trial. What if he keeps on trying differentcombinations again and again? Will he ever find the correct combination?


23/25

Let the monkey type out all 200 at the rate of 1 billion trials per second for 30 billion years. Even giving such liberalconditions [The earth is not 30 billion years old according to evolutionists] the number or trials that can be performed isonly 5 x 10 to the 104th power. This is still far too short of the needed 10 to the 375th power . Simply stated the chance isnonexistent!

And yet this 200 part system is ridiculously primitive compared with living systems. Modern research by NASA has shownthe most basic type of protein molecule that could be classified living is composed of at least 400 linked amino acids.Each amino acid, in turn, is made up of a specific arrangement of four or five chemical elements, and each chemicalelement is itself a unique combination of protons, neutrons, and electrons! Golay had demonstrated that the chance

formation of even the simplest replicating protein molecule is 1 in 10 to the 450th power . Wysong has calculated theprobability of forming the proteins and DNA for the smallest self-replicating entity to be 1 in 10to the 167,626th power,even giving generous amounts of billions of years.

Now, can you imagine the chance formation of a more complex structure or organ such as the human brain? It containsover 10,000,000,000 cells each of which is carefully arranged according to a specific design, and each of which isfantastically complex in itself! " 11

Evolutionists insist that highly complex systems consisting of almost unmeasurable components can arrange themselvesin such a way as to have created a human! Give me a break!

The famous Dr. Colin Patterson, who was then the Senior Paleontologist at the London Museum of Natural History and anevolutionist, in his opening remarks in an address given at the Amer- ican Museum of Natural History, New York City on

November 5, 1981 said, to the gathered evolutionists,

"Last year I had a sudden realization that for over twenty years I thought I was working on evolution in some way. Onemorning I woke up a

Documents

Evolution-The Real Truth