14
ESTABLISHMENT OF CENTRES OF EXCELLENCE IN PAEDIATRICS (CEP) IN THE KAI TAK DEVELOPMENT (PWP No. 076MM) Proposed Conceptual Scheme and Development Parameters 1 and Development Parameters For Discussion In the Task Force on Kai Tak Harbourfront Development on 16 January 2012

ESTABLISHMENT OF CENTRES OF EXCELLENCE IN … · The Baseline Proposal 3. The Current Proposal 2 4. Major Principles on Exterior Design of CEP. Site Location Plan Site B Boundary

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

ESTABLISHMENT OF

CENTRES OF EXCELLENCE IN PAEDIATRICS (CEP)

IN THE KAI TAK DEVELOPMENT(PWP No. 076MM)

Proposed Conceptual Scheme

and Development Parameters

1

and Development Parameters

For Discussion

In the Task Force on Kai Tak Harbourfront Development

on 16 January 2012

Content

1. Urban Design Frameworks &

Development Parameters

2. The Baseline Proposal

3. The Current Proposal

2

4. Major Principles on Exterior

Design of CEP

Site Location Plan

Site B

Boundary of Kai Tak

Development

1. Urban Design Frameworks & Parameters

2. The Baseline Proposal

3. The Current Proposal

4. Major Principles on Exterior Design of CEP

3

Site B

Site A

Site C

(Approx. 2.17 ha.)

Kwun Tong Typhoon Shelter

Megabox

Kowloon Godown(planned residential redevelopment)

Kowloon Bay

Tourism &

Leisure Hub(Cruise Terminal &

Runway Park)

Aerial View (Site Context)

Kwun Tong

Site A

1. Urban Design Frameworks & Parameters

2. The Baseline Proposal

3. The Current Proposal

4. Major Principles on Exterior Design of CEP

4

Kai Tak Approach Channel

Megabox

Runway Precinct(Commercial/Residential Development)

Runway Park)

South Apron

Site B

Future

Waterfront

Promenade

Site C

Site A

STATUTORY NON-STATUTORY

(A)

Kai Tak Outline Zoning Plan

(B)

Advices from PlanD

&CEDD

(C)

Sustainable Building Design

Guidelines (PNAP APP-152)

1. Site coverage Not exceeding 65%

2. Plot Ratio 5.0 (Note 1)

3. Building Height

LimitNot exceeding 60mPD

4. “Podium-free”

“Podium-free” design concept

is stipulated as one of the

major urban design principles

Urban Design Frameworks & Parameters1. Urban Design Frameworks & Parameters

2. The Baseline Proposal

3. The Current Proposal

4. Major Principles on Exterior Design of CEP

5

4. “Podium-free”

designmajor urban design principles

as stipulated in the

Explanatory Statement of OZP

5. Building

Separation &

Maximum

Projected façade

length (Lp)

Lp not exceeding 5 times the

width of street

6. Building

permeability (P)

20% & 25% on two adjacent

projection planes

7. Greening Ratio

Pedestrian zone: 20% of site area

Roof: 20% of roof area

Overall: 30% of site area

Pedestrian zone: 15% of site area

Other locations: not specified

Overall: 30% of site area

(A higher greening ratio as recommended in

the CPLD Paper No.25/11 shall be followed for

development sites in KTD)

Note 1: While there is no statutory plot ratio control for the “G/IC” site of CEP, a reference plot ratio of 5 has

been recommended by PlanD to ArchSD at TFS Stage taking account of the restrictions imposed on

other development sites in Kai Tak.

The Baseline Proposal – Single Block1. Urban Design Frameworks & Parameters

2. The Baseline Proposal

3. The Current Proposal

4. Major Principles on Exterior Design of CEP

6

Approx. 66m

Approx. 200 m

Single Block

BASELINE PROPOSAL

1. “Podium-free” design In compliance

The Baseline Proposal – Single Block1. Urban Design Frameworks & Parameters

2. The Baseline Proposal

3. The Current Proposal

4. Major Principles on Exterior Design of CEP

7

2. Building Height Restriction (not exceeding 60mPD) In compliance

3. Site Coverage (not exceeding 65%) In compliance

4. Building Permeability (minimum 25% & 20%) In compliance

5. Greening Ratio

(overall > 30%; pedestrian zone > 20%;

roof greening > 20%)

In compliance

6. Plot Ratio 5.5 (Note 2)

Note 2: Based on the net operational floor area and the enhanced spatial standard required by the client department, it is

estimated that the plot ratio of the proposed CEP will be approximately 5.5 in order to accommodate the required

facilities.

Relocation of some facilities to the basement and reduction in

carparking spaces (about 30% less than original provisions)

Design Evolution

Splitting of long building

into two smaller buildings

Boundary Line Boundary Line

ROAD D4

+60mPD

Baseline Proposal

1. Urban Design Frameworks & Parameters

2. The Baseline Proposal

3. The Current Proposal

4. Major Principles on Exterior Design of CEP

8

OUTDOOR

LANDSCAPE AREA

Linkbridges at Level 2, 3 & 9 to enhance

connection between two blocks

Approx. 99 m Approx. 99 m

Current Proposal

INTERNAL

COURTYARD

INTERNAL

COURTYARD

The Current Proposal1. Urban Design Frameworks & Parameters

2. The Baseline Proposal

3. The Current Proposal

4. Major Principles on Exterior Design of CEP

9

Approx.

66m

Approx. 99 m Approx. 99 m

OUTDOOR

LANDSCAPE

AREA

ROOF TERRACE ROOF TERRACE

1) Maximization of view corridor;

2) Better air ventilation for inner building sites with reduced building bulk;

3) Better visual and physical integration with the waterfront promenade at ground floor

BASELINE PROPOSAL CURRENT PROPOSAL

1. “Podium-free” design In compliance � In compliance

2.Building Height Restriction (not

exceeding 60mPD)In compliance � In compliance

3. Site Coverage (not exceeding 65%) In compliance � In compliance

4.Building Permeability

In compliance � In compliance

Comparison of Baseline and Current Proposals1. Urban Design Frameworks & Parameters

2. The Baseline Proposal

3. The Current Proposal

4. Major Principles on Exterior Design of CEP

10

4.Building Permeability

(minimum 25% & 20%)In compliance � In compliance

5. Greening Ratio

(overall > 30%; pedestrian zone > 20%;

roof greening > 20%)

In compliance � In compliance

6. Plot Ratio Approx. 5.5 Approx. 5.5

7. Pros

a) Maximization of floor plates for greater flexibility for

user operation

b) Enhancement of connectivity between various user

departments

c) Lower construction cost

a) Better visual permeability

b) Better pedestrian connectivity to waterfront

promenade

c) Better ventilation performance

d) Better integration with adjacent promenade

8. Cons

a) Result in adverse wall effect

b) Poor integration of external spaces

c) Not pedestrian-friendly

d) Poor accessibility to waterfront promenade

a) Higher construction cost

b) Smaller floor plate less desirable for various

user departments (But still acceptable to

Users)

Aerial View from South Direction

1. Urban Design Frameworks & Parameters

2. The Baseline Proposal

3. The Current Proposal

4. Major Principles on Exterior Design of CEP

11

The Current Scheme

Preliminary CFD analysis of current scheme under WSW (left) and ESE (right) wind

directions

1. Urban Design Frameworks & Parameters

2. The Baseline Proposal

3. The Current Proposal

4. Major Principles on Exterior Design of CEP

12

1) Maximization of view corridor;

2) Better air ventilation for inner building sites with reduced building

bulk;

3) Better visual and physical integration with the waterfront

promenade at ground floor.

1. Creation of non-institutional and patient-centered healthcare environment

which is conducive to patient healing

2. Creation of an identity of contemporary paediatric healthcare facilities

3. Emphasis of place-making and integration with public spaces at waterfront

promenade

Major Principles on Exterior Design of CEP1. Urban Design Frameworks & Parameters

2. The Baseline Proposal

3. The Current Proposal

4. Major Principles on Exterior Design of CEP

13

4. Sense of human scale and urban intimacy with interesting building forms

5. Optimized building and visual permeability

6. Green building design with application of renewable energy technology

7. Landscape design with themes conducive to healing and rehabilitation

Thank you

14

Thank you