8
Proposal for an Omnibus Baseline Amendment Presentation for MAFMC By Melissa Hooper August 14, 2013

Proposal for an Omnibus Baseline Amendment

  • Upload
    alessa

  • View
    33

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Proposal for an Omnibus Baseline Amendment. Presentation for MAFMC By Melissa Hooper. August 14, 2013. Background. Most NE limited access fisheries have vessel upgrade restrictions Purpose is to limit increases in harvest capacity Now have effort controls and Annual Catch Limits (ACLs) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Proposal for an Omnibus Baseline Amendment

Proposal for an Omnibus Baseline

AmendmentPresentation for MAFMC

By Melissa Hooper

August 14, 2013

Page 2: Proposal for an Omnibus Baseline Amendment

Background• Most NE limited access fisheries have vessel

upgrade restrictions• Purpose is to limit increases in harvest capacity• Now have effort controls and Annual Catch Limits

(ACLs)• Upgrade restrictions a burden to industry and

NMFS• Could simplify without undermining conservation

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 2

Page 3: Proposal for an Omnibus Baseline Amendment

Baseline Workgroup• Created by NRCC in 2011• White paper• 5 suggestions• ANPR

• ANPR published Oct. 5, 2011• Public comment period ended Dec. 5, 2011

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 3

Page 4: Proposal for an Omnibus Baseline Amendment

Public Comments• Total comments = 35• Oppose all proposed changes• Support removal of all upgrade restrictions• Support removing tonnages• Support removing one-time upgrade limit• Exempt vessels under 30 ft• Change to series of size classes• Other suggestions

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 4

Page 5: Proposal for an Omnibus Baseline Amendment

Proposed ActionNERO develop an omnibus amendment

1. Eliminate gross and net tonnage specifications• Most variable of specifications• Documentation is costly to get and verify• Negligible impact to harvest capacity

2. Remove the one-time upgrade restriction• Provide more flexibility and fairness• Streamline the replacement process• Negligible impact to harvest capacity

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 5

Page 6: Proposal for an Omnibus Baseline Amendment

Process and TimelineDate Action

August-September 2013 Council meetings Present plan to CouncilsOctober-November 2013 Gather input from species committeesNovember 2013-March 2014 Analyze alternatives and draft

amendmentMarch-April 2014 Present draft amendment to species

committeesApril 2014 Council meetings Present draft amendment to Councils for

adoptionJune 2014 Council meetings Hold public hearingsAugust-September 2014 Council meetings Final Council approval of amendment

documentSeptember 2014-February 2015 Proposed and Final rulemakingMay 1, 2015 Final rule effective

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 6

Page 7: Proposal for an Omnibus Baseline Amendment

Questions for the Council today• Do you wish the species committees to provide input to

the amendment?• Do you wish to schedule species committee meetings

in conjunction with the October and April Council meetings?

• If a species committee is not scheduled to meet, should the amendment be delayed?

• How should any proposed changes be reconciled between the two Councils?

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 7

Page 8: Proposal for an Omnibus Baseline Amendment

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 8