1
Assisted Flaring Flare emissions are controlled by injection of air or steam into the flame. Air/steam is intended to suppress soot formation and reduce luminosity. Motivation Overuse of air/steam in flaring has led to major regulatory violations. Too much air/steam smothers the flame allowing waste gas to escape. Recent studies show that assist requirements may be overstated. Over-aeration/steaming compromises combustion efficiency (<96.5%). Principles of Operation Wide variety of flare designs exist. Purpose is to improve combustion. 0 20 40 60 80 100 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Combustion Efficiency (%) Steam-to-Flare Gas Mass Ratio FG = 937 lb/hr FG = 2,342 lb/hr 96.5% CE 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 50 100 150 200 250 Combustion Efficiency (%) Air-to-Flare Gas Mass Ratio FG = 902 lb/hr FG = 353 lb/hr 96.5% CE Flare Design A coflow burner was designed with an inner tube for air or steam assist. Thermocouples at burner tip measure exit flow temperatures allowing for estimates to be made of fuel and air/steam exit velocities. Test Facility Facility was designed to handle fuel flow rates equivalent to ~50 kW. Fuel options include methane, propane, and natural gas. 300 SLPM of air and 408 g/min of steam is available for assisting flame. Conclusion Assisted flaring is necessary for emissions control but has limitations. A test facility was established to evaluate emissions from lab-scale flares. Emissions data is used to estimate carbon conversion efficiency and emission indices for CO 2 , unburned hydrocarbons, soot, and NO x . 1. The John Zink Hamworthy Combustion Handbook, Chapter 11 Flares 2. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/flaringviolations.pdf 3. https://www.google.com/patentsUS7967600/ 4. Allen, D. T., & Torres, V. M. (2011, August 1). TCEQ 2010 Flare Study Final Report Abbas Ahsan, Hamza Ahsan, Jason S. Olfert, Larry W. Kostiuk Reacting Flow Laboratory, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada Establishing a Test Facility for Measuring the Carbon Conversion Efficiency and Emissions Indices for Lab-Scale Air and Steam Assisted Flares No steam John Zink flare with varying steam injection flow rates [1] Upper Ring Nozzles Center Nozzle Lower Nozzle (steam) Flare Gas Promote turbulence and entrain air Increase flare gas momentum Common design features of an assisted flare [3] Combustion efficiency trends for air- and steam-assisted flares [4] Properly operated flare (left) and over-steamed flare (right) [2] Venting methane! Lab-scale flare with varying quantities of steam-assist John Zink steam- (right) and air-assisted (left) flare [4] 109 cm OD 91 cm OD Minimum operating set point Starting steam Full steam No steam Starting steam Full steam

Establishing a Test Facility for Measuring the Carbon ... · The John Zink Hamworthy Combustion Handbook, ... John Zink flare with varying steam injection flow rates [1] Upper Ring

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    13

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Establishing a Test Facility for Measuring the Carbon ... · The John Zink Hamworthy Combustion Handbook, ... John Zink flare with varying steam injection flow rates [1] Upper Ring

Assisted Flaring• Flare emissions are controlled by injection of air or steam into the flame.

• Air/steam is intended to suppress soot formation and reduce luminosity.

Motivation• Overuse of air/steam in flaring has led to major regulatory violations.

• Too much air/steam smothers the flame allowing waste gas to escape.

• Recent studies show that assist requirements may be overstated.

• Over-aeration/steaming compromises combustion efficiency (<96.5%).

Principles of Operation• Wide variety of flare designs exist. Purpose is to improve combustion.

0

20

40

60

80

100

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

Co

mb

usti

on

Eff

icie

ncy (

%)

Steam-to-Flare Gas Mass Ratio

FG = 937 lb/hr FG = 2,342 lb/hr 96.5% CE

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 50 100 150 200 250

Co

mb

usti

on

Eff

icie

ncy (

%)

Air-to-Flare Gas Mass Ratio

FG = 902 lb/hr FG = 353 lb/hr 96.5% CE

Flare Design• A coflow burner was designed with an inner tube for air or steam assist.

• Thermocouples at burner tip measure exit flow temperatures allowing for

estimates to be made of fuel and air/steam exit velocities.

Test Facility• Facility was designed to handle fuel flow rates equivalent to ~50 kW.

• Fuel options include methane, propane, and natural gas.

• 300 SLPM of air and 408 g/min of steam is available for assisting flame.

Conclusion• Assisted flaring is necessary for emissions control but has limitations.

• A test facility was established to evaluate emissions from lab-scale flares.

• Emissions data is used to estimate carbon conversion efficiency and

emission indices for CO2, unburned hydrocarbons, soot, and NOx.

1. The John Zink Hamworthy Combustion Handbook, Chapter 11 – Flares

2. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/flaringviolations.pdf

3. https://www.google.com/patentsUS7967600/

4. Allen, D. T., & Torres, V. M. (2011, August 1). TCEQ 2010 Flare Study Final Report

Abbas Ahsan, Hamza Ahsan, Jason S. Olfert, Larry W. Kostiuk

Reacting Flow Laboratory, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

Establishing a Test Facility for Measuring the Carbon

Conversion Efficiency and Emissions Indices for

Lab-Scale Air and Steam Assisted Flares

No steam

John Zink flare with varying steam injection flow rates [1]

Upper Ring

Nozzles

Center

Nozzle

Lower

Nozzle

(steam)

Flare Gas

Promote

turbulence and

entrain air

Increase flare

gas momentum

Common design features of an assisted flare [3]

Combustion efficiency trends for air- and steam-assisted flares [4]

Properly operated flare (left) and over-steamed flare (right) [2]

Venting methane!

Lab-scale flare with varying quantities of steam-assist

John Zink steam- (right) and air-assisted (left) flare [4]

109 cm OD 91 cm OD

Minimum

operating

set point

Starting steam Full steam

No steam Starting steam Full steam