25
ESCP EUROPE BUSINESS SCHOOL BERLIN TALENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME – EINE LOHNENDE INVESTITION? The Team Bombardier: Claudia Fischer ESCP Europe: Domitille Bonneton ([email protected]) Stephanie Schworm ([email protected]) Marion Festing ([email protected]) Maral Muratbekova ([email protected])

ESCP EUROPE BUSINESS SCHOOL BERLIN · ESCP EUROPE BUSINESS SCHOOL BERLIN TALENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME – EINE LOHNENDE INVESTITION? The Team Bombardier: Claudia Fischer ESCP Europe:

  • Upload
    lamtram

  • View
    220

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

ESCP EUROPE

BUSINESS SCHOOL BERLIN

TALENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME – EINE LOHNENDE INVESTITION?

The Team Bombardier: Claudia Fischer ESCP Europe: Domitille Bonneton ([email protected]) Stephanie Schworm ([email protected]) Marion Festing ([email protected]) Maral Muratbekova ([email protected])

INTRODUCTION

BOMBARDIER:

EVOLUTION OF MOBILITY

Investing in leading mobility solutions

Growing local roots in key markets

Achieving flawless execution

Great Talent Globally

Integrated Sustainability Active Risk

Management Strong Financial

Discipline

Our growth strategies

Our competitive foundation

BOMBARDIER

OVERVIEW

4

Bombardier Transportation

Bombardier Business Aircraft

Bombardier Commercial Aircraft

Bombardier Aerostructures and Engineering Services

Revenues(1) $8.3 billion $7.0 billion $2.4 billion $1.8 billion

Order backlog(1) $30.4 billion $17.2 billion $11.5 billion $80 million(3)

Employees(2) 39,400 10,400 5,050 12,100

(1) As at December 31, 2015

(2) As at December 31, 2015, including contractual and inactive employees. Subsequent to the end of the fiscal year, we decided to take steps to optimize our workforce with a combination of manpower reduction and strategic hiring. These figures do not reflect the planned changes.

(3) External order backlog

GLOBAL GRADUATE

PROGRAM OVERVIEW

Global Graduate Program One Global Program Standard selection process 18 months program with 3 rotations 3 main tracks 4 development modules

Forecast 2015: Demand for ~ 28 Global Graduates

Generation 2013: 29 Global Graduates, final integration March 2015

Generation 2014: 30 Global Graduates, second rotation March 2015

~ 90 Alumni since 2008 Overall HP status 26,6% compared to 5,7% of direct entries

1st Alumni conference in 2014 Turnover rate increasing (overall 11,5%)

Employer Branding

Collaboration

Talent Development

GGP STRUCTURE

Business Experience: Development on the

job

1st Assignment: Country 1/ Division

1/ Function 1

Sept. 2014 March 2015 Sept. 2015

Personal

Development:

Objective Assessment

Mentoring

Performance Management

Rotations / New roles

2nd Assignment: Country 2/ Division 2/

Function 2

3rd Assignment: Country 3/ Division 3/

Function 3

Inte

gra

tion

into

Bu

sin

es

s

Development off the job

Module 1:

Connect !

Module 2:

Develop !

Module 3:

Strengthen !

Module 4:

Transfer !

THE STUDY

CONTEXT

Bombardier launched the Graduate Program in 2008

Aim: attract, develop and retain talents

The program was stopped – desire to assess its actual effect on retention, through the creation of network, career success and organizational commitment

Comparison between talents who did the graduate program and a control group who did not

Aim: measure the relations between talent management, network, objective career success, subjective career success, organizational affective commitment and intention to stay with the company.

THE CONCEPTS

9

Network (knowing-whom)

How well is the individual connected within the organization

Objective Career Success

How well the career evolved objectively (salary increases,

number of promotions…)

Subjective Career Success

How the individual feels about their career success (their

personal perception) Affective organizational

commitment

How the individual feels affectively attached to the

organization

Intention to stay (turnover intention)

To what extent the individual

plans to stay with the organization

METHODS

The questionnaire was sent:

– To talents (who participated in the graduate program) and to other employees from the control group (who were not part of the program)

– To employees still working at Bombardier, and to employees who left the company

We measured the constructs with already validated scales (knowing-whom, objective career success, subjective career success, organizational affective commitment and intention to stay in the company)

We developed an index to measure talent management

10

MEASURES

11

Measures Item example

Talent Management index To what extent do you feel that you went through a highly selective process when you were recruited?

Network Co-workers say that I know a lot of people within the organization

Affective Commitment I would be very happy to spend the rest of my career with Bombardier

Objective Career Success What is the percentage of salary increase since the start of your career at Bombardier?

Subjective Career Success I am satisfied with the progress I have made towards meeting my overall career goals.

Intention to stay I intend to look for a job outside of Bombardier within the next year

DESCRIPTION OF THE SAMPLE

OVERVIEW

Still at Bombardier

Left Bombardier TOTAL

Talents 87 13 100

Other employees

40 1 41

TOTAL 127 14 141

71%

29%

Talents

Other employees

87%

13%

Still at Bombardier

Left Bombardier

Proportion of the sample: talents and other employees Proportion of the sample: still at Bombardier and left Bombardier

DEMOGRAPHICS

14

TALENTS 29

OTHER EMPLOYEES 34

TOTAL 31

31%

69%

Women

Men

Average age of participants

Gender of participants

CURRENT SITUATION OF PARTICIPANTS

15

Australia 5

Austria 1

Canada 4

China 3

France 10

Germany 67

Italy 3

Mexico 1

Singapore 1

South Africa 1

Spain 3

Sweden 15

Switzerland 17

United Arab Emirates 2

United Kingdom 1

USA 4

N/A 3

Current working country of all participants

Bids 3

Engineering 31

Finance 6

Human Resources 11

Information Services 4

Innovation Management 1

Legal 1

Operations 8

President's office 1

Procurement 27

Product Introduction 1

Project Management 20

Project Management Office 1

Quality 4

Sales 3

Strategy 2

N/A 3

Total 127

Current department (only participants who are still working at Bombardier)

Starting department (only participants who are still working at Bombardier)

Bids 1

Engineering 37

Finance 5

Human Resources 12

Information Services 3

Innovation Management 1

Legal 01

Operations 15

President's office 0

Procurement 20

Product Introduction 1

Project Management 21

Project Management Office 0

Quality 6

RCS 1

Serv 1

N/A 2

Total 127

WHERE DO TALENTS COME FROM?

16

Au

stri

an

Bel

gian

Bu

lgar

ian

Can

adia

n

Cze

ch

Du

tch

Fren

ch

Ge

rman

Gre

ek

Ind

ian

Isra

eli

Ital

ian

Mal

aysi

an

Mex

ican

Po

lish

Po

rtu

gues

e

Span

ish

Swed

ish

Turk

ish

Ven

ezu

elan

Un

kno

wn

France 1 2

Germany 5 1 1 11 5 11 7 1 3 2 1 1 1 2

Hungary 1

Italy 1 1

Poland 1

South Africa 1

Spain 1 1

Sweden 5 1 1 3 2 1 1 2 3 2

Switzerland 1 1 1 2 1 2

UK 1 1 1 0

USA 1 1 1 1

UAE 1 1

Nationality

CONTROL GROUP: WHERE DO THEY

COME FROM?

17

unknown Austrian Canadian Chinese French German Italian Senegalese Swedish

Austria 1

Canada 1

China 2

France 1 5 1

Germany 10 17 1

Italy 1

Sweden 1

Sta

rti

ng

co

un

try a

t B

om

bard

ier

Nationality

DEVELOPMENT OF TALENTS AT BOMBARDIER

18

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Gesamt

non-supervisor

1 0 1 3 7 3 11 8 14 48

first line supervisor

0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 1 5

lower manager

0 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 19

middle manager

0 0 2 3 3 0 0 1 0 9

senior manager

0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4

Gesamt 1 6 5 10 13 7 16 12 17 87

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Talent

controlgroup

Number of international assignments

Nr of assignemnts

Nr o

f resp

on

den

ts

LANGUAGE SKILLS

19

3

31

47

15

3

1

1

27

13

0

0

0

0 10 20 30 40 50

1

2

3

4

5

6

OTHER EMPLOYEES

TALENTS

Number of languages spoken

3%

31%

47%

15%

3%

1% TALENTS

1

2

3

4

5

6

2%

66%

32%

OTHER EMPLOYEES

1

2

3

Nr of respondents

Nr o

f la

ng

uag

es s

poken

Nu

mb

er o

f lan

gu

ag

es s

poken

N

um

ber o

f lan

gu

ag

es s

poken

RESULTS OF THE MODEL

TALENTS

21

Intention to stay

Objective career

success

Subjective career success

Affective commitment

Knowing whom

Talent Management

Signifikanter Einfluss Nicht signifikanter Einfluss Negativer Einfluss

-

-

CONTROL GROUP

22

Intention to stay

Objective career

success

Subjective career success

Affective commitment

Knowing whom

Talent Management

Signifikanter Einfluss Nicht signifikanter Einfluss

INTERPRETATION

Taking part in a Talent Management Program has positive effects on – The internal network – Career success – Commitment – The intention to stay in the organization

In the control group these effects were not all observed. Nevertheless it holds across the two groups that the use of HR practices are followed by subjective career success and commitment.

Commitment increases the desire to remain with the company. There is empirical evidence of previous studies that has found this effect, which we reconfirm.

Surprising is the negative impact of objective career success on the intention to stay in the organization. This could be explained by the fact that the limits of an organization may become more apparent with great objective success. Meanwhile chances of increasing an objective career success through a company change may become more apparent for the individual. Overall, it can be concluded that the participation in a Talent Management program significantly increases the chances to commit individuals to the organization, whilst increasing the chances to be successful in their careers.

23

CONCLUSION

BOMBARDIER

What did Bombardier well with the talent program?

– Internal network

– International job assignments

What does Bombardier need to improve to keep their talents?

– watch alumni program talents to keep promises, e.g. fast-track management program

– Monitor career progression, job changes and promotions

– Compare salaries versus responsibility and make internal benchmark

– Ensure ROI

If program would be restarted: focus on talents cannot end with end of GGP, continuous investment in development and motivation needed to retain talent

24

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

25