9
Indian Journal of Biotechnology Vol I, January 2002, pp 87-95 Electrosta,tic Interactions, Phase Separation Behaviour and Partitioning of Proteins in Polyelectrolyte Based Aqueous Two-Phase Systems Vandana Gupta, Sunil Nath and Subhash Chand* Department of Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016 , Indi a Electrostatic interactions playa major role in the purification of proteins by different methods and they tend to be specific in nature in the presence of salts and environmental hydrogen ion concentration (PH). These can be readily exploited as the basis for protein isolation and purification by aqueous two-phase system (ATPS) using a polyelectrolyte as one of the polymeric components. Polyelectrolytes are water-soluble charged polymers and the phase separation in the polyelectrolyte based ATPS is dependent on the ionic composition of the system and the charge density of polymers. This review outlines the mechanism of the phase separation in non-ionic polymers based ATPS on the basis of water structure in polymeric solution and validity of the hypothesis is further discussed for polyelectrolyte-based systems. Partitioning of proteins in polyeletrolyte based ATPS is dominantly controlled by the electrostatic interactions. Several factors that influence the partitioning of proteins include the properties of the polymers, pH, salt type and concentration and the charge on protein molecules. Low polymer concentration requirement for the phase separation and high specificity of protein purification in polyelectrolyte based ATPS holds a great promise for their large scale applications in isolation and purification of proteins. Keywords: polyelectrolyte, electrostatic, bioseparation, proteins, aqueous two-phase Introduction Advances in genetic engineering, recombinant- DNA technology, cell fusion techniques in biotechnology have made it possible to produce protein based therapeutic products and vaccines on a large scale. The difficulties, however, lie in the separation of these bioproducts in the desired conformation in an ultra pure and stable form (Sadana & Beelaram, 1994; Lienqueo & Asenjo , 2000). Since the purification steps are so cost-intensive, emphasis has been on improving purification strategies, or analyzing and d eve loping new and more promising strategies for the separation of valuable proteins based on their physico-chemical properties and bulk environment. Major interactions that govern va ri ous protein isolation and purification schemes are electrostatic, hydrophobic, van der Waals' and hydrogen bonding (Scopes, 1994). A clear understanding of the physico- chemical interactions involved can help pave the way for not only the development of newer processes but also for the improvement of existing purification methods. The efficiency of the separation methods can be improved by regulating these interactions in * Author for correspondence: Tel: + 91 -11-6591004; Fax: + 91-11-6868521 E-ma il: [email protected] different ways. The current review is focused on the role of electrostatic interactions in partitioning of proteins in aqueous two phase system (A TPS ) including the phase separation behaviour and the partitioning of proteins in the polyelectrolytes based ATPS. Electrostatic Interactions Electrostatic interactions are important in biological systems as most biomolecules are charged under physiological conditions. Proteins are charged molecules that catTy ionizable amino acids imparting surface charge on them. The charge on the protein molecules can be varied by changing simple solution parameters li ke pH and ionic strength (Creighton, 1993). Moreover , quantification of the charge on th e protein can be performed by techniques like isoelectric focusing, titration (Wilson & Goulding, 1986) or by partitioning in ATPS (Johansson, 1994 ). The importance of electrostatic interactions lies in the fact that they tend to be highly specific in natur e. Only those proteins that are oppositely charged to th at of the p mify ing agent interact with them and by changing the pH or ionic st rength of the solution further, even proteins carrying similar kind of th e charge on th ei r s urface can be separated from each other. In comparison to electrostatic interactio ns , other non-covalent interactions lack the hi gh

Electrosta,tic Interactions, Phase Separation Behaviour and …nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/19853/1/IJBT 1(1... · 2013. 7. 21. · GUPTA et al: POLYELECTROLYTE BASED AQUEOUS

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Indian Journal of Biotechnology Vol I , January 2002, pp 87-95

    Electrosta,tic Interactions, Phase Separation Behaviour and Partitioning of Proteins in Polyelectrolyte Based Aqueous Two-Phase Systems

    Vandana Gupta, Sunil Nath and Subhash Chand*

    Department of Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Indi an Institute of Technology Delhi , New Delhi 110016, Indi a

    Electrostatic interactions playa major role in the purification of proteins by different methods and they tend to be specific in nature in the presence of salts and environmental hydrogen ion concentration (PH). These can be readily exploited as the basis for protein isolation and purification by aqueous two-phase system (ATPS) using a polyelectrolyte as one of the polymeric components. Polyelectrolytes are water-soluble charged polymers and the phase separation in the polyelectrolyte based ATPS is dependent on the ionic composition of the system and the charge density of polymers. This review outlines the mechanism of the phase separation in non-ionic polymers based A TPS on the basis of water structure in polymeric solution and validity of the hypothesis is further discussed for polyelectrolyte-based systems. Partitioning of proteins in polyeletrolyte based A TPS is dominantly controlled by the electrostatic interactions. Several factors that influence the partitioning of proteins include the properties of the polymers, pH, salt type and concentration and the charge on protein molecules. Low polymer concentration requirement for the phase separation and high specificity of protein purification in polyelectrolyte based A TPS holds a great promise for their large scale applications in isolation and purification of proteins.

    Keywords: polyelectrolyte, electrostatic, bioseparation, proteins, aqueous two-phase

    Introduction Advances in genetic engineering, recombinant-

    DNA technology, cell fusion techniques in biotechnology have made it possible to produce protein based therapeutic products and vaccines on a large scale. The difficulties , however, lie in the separation of these bioproducts in the desired conformation in an ultra pure and stable form (Sadana & Beelaram, 1994; Lienqueo & Asenjo, 2000) . Since the purification steps are so cost-intensive, emphasis has been on improving purification strategies, or analyzing and developing new and more promising strategies for the separation of valuable proteins based on their physico-chemical properties and bulk environment.

    Major interactions that govern various protein isolation and purification schemes are electrostatic , hydrophobic, van der Waals' and hydrogen bonding (Scopes, 1994). A clear understanding of the physico-chemical interactions involved can help pave the way for not only the development of newer processes but also for the improvement of existing purification methods. The efficiency of the separation methods can be improved by regulating these interactions in

    * Author for correspondence: Tel: + 91 -11-6591004; Fax: + 91-11-6868521 E-mail: [email protected]

    different ways. The current review is focused on the role of electrostatic interactions in partitioning of proteins in aqueous two phase system (A TPS ) including the phase separation behaviour and the partitioning of proteins in the polyelectrolytes based ATPS.

    Electrostatic Interactions Electrostatic interactions are important in biological

    systems as most biomolecules are charged under physiological conditions. Proteins are charged molecules that catTy ionizable amino ac ids imparting surface charge on them. The charge on the protein molecules can be varied by changing simple solution parameters li ke p H and ionic strength (Creighton , 1993). Moreover, quantification of the charge on the protein can be performed by techniques like isoelectric focusing , titrati on (Wilson & Goulding, 1986) or by partition ing in ATPS (Johansson, 1994).

    The importance of electrostatic interactions lies in the fact that they tend to be highly specific in nature. Only those proteins that are oppositely charged to th at of the pmify ing agent interact with them and by changing the pH or ionic strength of the solution further, even proteins carrying similar kind of the charge on thei r surface can be separated from each other. In comparison to electrostatic interactions , other non-covalent interactions lack the high

  • 88 fNDIAN J BIOTECHNOL, JANUARY 2002

    specificity level s. Various bioseparation processes based on electrostatic interactions are:

    (i) Ion exchange chromatography (Karlsson et aI, 1989; Belter et aZ, 1988);

    (ii) Ultrafiltration using charged membranes (Huisman et aZ, 2000; Chaufer & Rabiller-Baudry, 2001; Pouliot et aI, 1999);

    (iii) Electrophoresis with various modifications (Nath et ai, 1990a; 1990b; 1993; 1996; Corthals et ai, 1997; Denton & Tate, 1997; Chidambra Raj, 1994; Shimura, 1990; Andrews et ai, 2000; Lim et ai, 1993; Yang et aI, 1998; Kontturi et aI, 1994; Regnier et aZ, 1999);

    (iv) Precipitation by charged polymers (Nath, 1995 ; Nath et ai, 1995; Gupta et ai, 2000; Clark & Glatz, 1992; Sternberg & Hershberger, 1974);

    (v) Partitioning in ATPS (Alberts son, 1986).

    Role of Water Structure in Phase Separation in ATPS

    The ATPS's are obtained by mixIng two incompatible polymers/polymer-salt solutions above a critical concentration. Proteins tend to partition into these A TPS' s on the basis of their differential affinity for the phases, which is dependent on the properties of the phase-forming polymers. ATPS's offer several advantages for purification of proteins such as mild conditions; short processing times, ease of scale up, simple process equipment/instrumentation requirement, and its application at the initial stage of the protein purification (Albertsson, 1986; Baskir et ai, 1989). The bioseparation system performance is usually described in terms of phase volume ratio and partition coefficient (defined as the ratio of concentration of the desired protein in the two-phases).

    The structure and/or state of water in an aqueous polymer system are of fundamental importance for phase separation (Zaslavsky et ai, 1983; 1989). The phase separation in an aqueous mixture of two polymers results from effect of polymers on the water structure and the phase separation is due to the incompatibility of these polymer-modified water structures. This hypothesis is validated by studies on a number of water structure perturbing factors on the phase separation process e.g., inorganic salts, temperature and urea (Zaslavsky, 1995).

    The dfect of different inorganic salts on the phase behavior could be attributed to their role in affecting

    the structure of water in the system. The salts have been classified as "structure breaking" and "structure making" to describe the effects of different ions on the structure of water. By these terms it is impli ed that the effect of a structure-breaking ion on water is qualitatively similar to that of an increase in temperature, while a structure-making ion produces an opposite effect like that of a decrease in temperature. The structure-affecting properties of the ions are displayed in such properties of their aqueous solutions as the viscosity (structure-breaking ions reduce it), the rate of exchange of water molecules between the hydration shell and bulk water (structure-breaking ions decrease its energy of activation), the longitudinal relaxation rate of the water molecule measured by NMR (structure-breaking ions increase it), etc . According to the various measures of the effects of ions on the structure of water, the water structure making category of ions include cations,

    h L ·+ N + NH + C ?+ M ?+ d' suc as I , a, 4, a- , g-, etc., an amons, such as F, SO/, cot, P043-, CH3COO-, etc. , and the structure breaking ions are K+, Rb+, Cs+, cr, Br", 1", SCN-, N03-, CI04-, etc (Zaslavsky, 1995).

    At the molecular level , a reorganization of the water molecules or H-bonds can be perceived either as structure making or breaking (Conway, 1981; Edsall & Mckenzie, 1978; 1983; Kjellander & Florin; 1981 ; Florin et ai, 1984). This was confirmed by measuring the rate of exchange of water molecules between the hydration shell of the ion and bulk water and the longitudinal relaxation rate of the water molecules as measured by NMR (Krestov, 1984; Marcus, 1985). Therefore, in the presence of water structure making salts like sulphate the concentration of the polymers to form two phases decreased whereas water structure breaking anions like bromide or chloride required higher concentration of the polymers to form two phases in dextran/ficoll , or polyethyleneglycol (PEG) based ATPS's (Zaslavsky, 1995). However, a clear understanding of the differential behaviour of these two categories of ions is still lacking.

    The effect of temperature and urea (water structure breaking compound) also match with the hypothesis that the phase separation is due to the incompatibility of the polymer-modified water structures. To further confirm the validity of this hypothesis , phase diagrams were also analyzed using the Flory-Huggins theory and the aqueous solution thermodynamics approach (Zaslavsky et aI, 1989). The Flory-Huggins interaction parameter (X) was measured for polymer-

  • GUPTA et al: POLYELECTROLYTE BASED AQUEOUS TWO-PHASE SYSTEM 89

    polymer and polymer-water systems in the presence of various water structure perturbing factors to understand the importance of the state or structure of the water in phase separation. The results showed that addition of a salt or urea, or an increase in the temperature producing significant alterations of the phase diagram, does not affect the parameter XDex- PVP value showing that there are no direct interactions between the phase polymers and the ions or urea present in the system. On the other hand, the interaction parameters for the polymer-solvent

    interactions X Dex-H20 and XPVP-H

    20 values varied

    depending on the type of the additive present and on the temperature of the system (Zaslavsky et at, 1989). Such evidences while cover the non-ionic polymer based ATPS, the information in respect for polyelectrolyte based A TPS is lacking. The work conducted in our laboratory confirmed the existence of similar mechanism in polyelectrolyte based A TPS' s irrelevant of the kind of charge on the polyelectrolytes (Gupta, 2001) . In order to probe the role of water structure in the phase separation in polyelectrolytes [{ polyacrylic acid (PAA) or polyethylenimine(PEI) }-polyethylene glycol(PEG)] based A TPS' s, the effect of different inorganic salt additives that influence the water structures differently on the phase separation was studied. As mentioned earlier, nitrate is classified as a water structure breaking ion and sulphate and phosphate as water structure making ions. It can be seen from Fig.1(a & b) that the addition of the nitrate resulted in the elevation of the binodial line or the higher polymer requirement for the phase separation. On the other hand, in the presence of sulphate or phosphate a depression in the binodial line was observed implying the lower polymer concentration requirement for the phase separation.

    This trend was observed in the case of both positively as well as negatively charged polyelectrolytes (PEl and PAA, respectively) based ATPS contradicting the hypothesis that salts which act as the efficient counter ions to the polymers promote the phase separation (Dissing & Mattiasson, 1994). However, the similar behaviour shown by both PAA as well as PEl in the presence of ions indicate the role of water structure on the phase separation in the polyelectrolyte based ATPS's and the data amply conclude that the phase separation behaviour is strongly influenced by the structure and/or state of water in a polymeric mixture and their incompatibility.

    Parameters Influencing Phase Separation in Polyelectrolyte Based A TPS

    Phase separation in polyelectrolyte based ATPS ' s depends on a number of factors , major being the following ionic composition and charge density on the polyelectrolyte of the system:

    (a) Ionic Composition Phase separation in mixtures containing

    polyelectrolyte as one of the polymer depends highly on both the ionic strength and the kind of ions present. This is clearly shown by the systems containing Na-dextran sulphate-PEG and PAA-PEG. A mixture of Na-dextran sulphate-PEG that gave a homogenous solution below polymer concentrations of 20 % resulted in the phase separation by the addition of 0.15 M NaCl. Moreover, with increase in the salt

    4.0,-------------------, 3' '3 3.5 ~ 3.0 -C o 1.S

    :;::;

    ~ 1.0 C Q) () 1.5 C o o 1.0 (9 W 0.5 0..

    0.0 +----,-----,----_,__--_,__---.-------1 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 3.0

    PAA Concentration (% w/w)

    Fig. I (a). Effect of anion s on the phase behavior in PAA- PEG based aqueous two-phase system (salt concentration - 0.5 M). (e) Sodium nitrate; C.) sodium sulphate; ( .... ) sodium phosphate.

    8

    :i ?;

    ;:,R 0 6 '-" C 0

    :;::; co L... 4 ...... c Q) () C 0 0 1 (9 W 0..

    0

    0 1 134

    PEl Concentration (%w/w)

    Fig. I (b). Effect of anion on the binodial in PEI- PEG based ATPS. ( .... ) Nitrate; ce) Sulphate; (.) Phosphate. The concentration of the salt additive was I M in all systems.

  • 90 INDIAN J BIOTECHNOL, JANUARY 2002

    concentration, a lower concentration of the polymers was required for the phase separation e.g., in a mixture of 5% sodium-dextran sulphate in 0.15 M NaCI, at least 8% PEG was required for the phase separation, while in the presence of 1M NaCI only 1.5 % PEG 6000 was necessary for the phase separation (Albertsson, 1986). Similarly, in PEG-PAA based aqueous two-phase system, the addition of 0.15 M NaCI resulted in the lowering of the PAA concentration from 8% to 5%. Further addition of 1 M NaCl resulted in a decrease in the PAA concentration to as low as 1.5% (Perrau et ai, 1989). Similar results were also obtained with the polyvinylpyrrolidone (PYP)-PAA as well as gum acacia-PEG based A TPS in the presence of NaCl (Perrau et ai, 1989; Rastogi & Chand, 1989). In the case of PEI-hydroxyethylcellulose (REC) based aqueous two-phase system, with the addition of salt (0.3 mmol/g sodium sulphate) the PEl concentration required to form two phases decreased to 0.75% from 3% (Dissing & Mattiasson, 1993). The above experimental evidences clearly illustrate the role of salts in lowering the concentration of polymers required to form two phases. However, these studies on the polyelectrolyte based ATPS lack the mechanistic details of the phase behaviour.

    The concentration of PEG, which is necessary for the phase separation with a certain amount of dextran sulphate, depends also on the kind of salt added (Dissing & Mattiasson, 1993). The tendency to favour phase separation in a dextran sulphate - PEG mixture increases with the following series of cations (as chlorides): Li+ < NH4+ < Na+ < Cs+ < K+. The phase separation also depends on the kind of anions ; the tendency to favour phase separation decreases with the following series of anions(as sodium salts): N03- > cr > Y2 HPOt > Ih sot (Albertsson, 1986). In the PEI-HEC based ATPS, anions (in the decreasing order, PO/' > S042- > Cl) are efficient in promoting phase separation, the effect of which is attributed to the polyvalent anions being better counter ions to the positively-charged PEl chai ns to crosslink them and excl uding the PEG into the other phase (Dissing & Mattiasson, 1993). However, quantitative data to prove this hypothesis are lacking.

    (b) Charge Density of the Polyelectrolytes The charge density on the polyelectrolyte also plays

    a major role in the phase separation in polyelectrolyte-based PEG and can be controlled by varying the pH of the system. In PEI-HEC based

    ATPS, as the pH was increased from 4 to 9, the charge on the PEl was decreased . This decreased charge resulted in single-phase formation as the pH was increased to 9.0 (Dissing & Mattiasson , 1993). In the case of PAA-PEG based ATPS , with increase in the degree of neutralization of the PAA, the compatibility of the polymers decreases i.e., with increase in the ionic form of the polyelectrolyte, i~compatibility of the polymers to form two phases increases (Perrau et ai, 1989; Minh et aI, 1982).

    Although, these experimental evidences clearly indicate the importance of the ionic composition and the charge density on the polyelectrolyte as major parameters controlling phase separation in the polyelectrolyte based ATPS, limited studies on the phase separation behaviour of the polyelectrolyte based A TPS has hampered the deve lopment of these systems for studying the partitioning of proteins.

    Partitioning of Proteins in Polyelectrolyte Based ATPS

    The partitioning of the proteins 111 the polyelectrolyte based ATPS as a result of electrostatic interactions is controlled by several factors like the properties of the polymers, pH, salt and the charge on the protein molecules. Their gross effect can be quantified in terms of the electrostatic potential difference between two phases.

    Nature of the Phase Forming Polymers The charge on the polymer is the major factor that

    influences the partitioning of the proteins. Bovine Serum Albumin(BSA), when negatively charged partitioned into the positively charged bottom PEl rich phase in the PEI-hydroxyethylcellulose (PEI-HEC) based ATPS (Dissing & Mattiasson, 1994). Similarly, in PEG-gum acacia (a positively-charged plant based polysaccharide) based system, BSA (when negatively charged) partitioned in favour of positi vely-charged bottom gum acacia-rich phase (Rastogi & Chand, 1989). On the other hand, in the case of PEG-cashew-nut tree gum (an acidic heteropolysaccharide) , BSA (when negatively charged) is repelled by the bottom negatively-charged cashew-nut tree gum rich phase to the top PEG-rich phase (Sarubbo et ai, 2000). In the case of the A TPS composed of two net anionic acrylic co-polymers (pI 4 .8 and pI 4.1) trypsin from the crude bovi ne pancreatic extracts partitioned almost exclusively into the lower pI rich phase (K = 0.05) at pH 6.6 presumably because of an electrostatic interaction

  • GUPTA el (Ii: POL YELECTROL YTE BASED AQUEOUS TWO-PHASE SYSTEM 91

    between the positively charged trypsin and the more negatively charged of the two polymers. In the case of a polyampholyte (pi 4 .1) and polyvinyl alcohol biphasic system, at pH 8.2, a 3.4 fold enrichment of the trypsin was recorded in the lower phase. In an oppositely charged polyampholyte-polyvinylalcohol (PV A) system comprising of a polymer of pI 6.5 and PY A at pH 6.2, an almost two-fold enrichment was obtained in the upper phase (Hughes & Lowe, 1989). Therefore, as expected a protein partitioned into the polyelectrolyte-rich phase only when the protein molecules were oppositely charged to that of the polyelectrolyte, the higher the charge on the polymer the higher was the degree of electrostatic interaction between the protein and the polymer.

    The role of the hydrophobic component/polymer in polyelectrolyte based ATPS is not significant in comparison to the non-ionic polymers based ATPS. In the case of PEl-PEG based ATPS, a variation in the concentration of PEG did not influence the partitioning of the BSA as shown in Fig. 2 (Gupta, 2001). Earlier workers have shown that PEG controlled the partitioning of proteins in PEG-dextran based ATPS by changing the hydrophobicity of the system. However, in comparison to those systems, the concentration of PEG employed in our PEl-PEG based A TPS are much lower and therefore it is unlikely that hydrophobic interactions/components become significant.

    pH of the System The charge on the polyelectrolyte and on the

    protein's surface varies with the pH of the solution .

    6T---------------------------------~

    4

    2

    300 400 50

    -2

    -4

    ~~------~~~------~~~~------~ Salt Concentration (mM)

    Fig. 2. Effect of PEG concentration on the partitioning of the BSA in PEl (3%)-PEG based ATPS at pH 7.0. PEG concentration: (.) 4%; ( .... ) 5%; (e) 6%.

    Therefore, the pH of the system is an important parameter for the partitioning of proteins in the polyelectrolyte-based ATPS. In PEI-HEC based ATPS , BSA (pI 4.9) favoured the lower positively charged PEl-rich phase above pH 4.9 and moved into the top PEG-rich phase below pH 4.9 when it is repelled by the similarly charged PEl-rich bottom phase (Dissing & Mattiasson, 1994). In PEl-PEG based ATPS, a simulated mixture of proteins of varying isoelectric points i.e. BSA (pI 4.8), myoglobin (pI 7) and a-chymotrypsin (pi 8.75) could be purified selectively by changing the pH as shown in Fig. 3. These results showed that BSA partitioned into the lower PEl-rich phase above pH 4.8 when it i s negatively charged and partitioned into the top PEG-rich phase below pH 4.8 when positively charged. Similar partitioning trends were also observed for myoglobin and a-chymotrypsin i.e., below their isoelectric point they partitioned into the top PEG-rich phase and above the isoelectric point into the bottom PEl rich phase. As can be seen between pH 5-6, myoglobin and a- chymotrypsin being positively charged are repelled by the positively charged PEI-rich phase into the top PEG-rich phase. BSA, however, remains in the bottom PEl-rich phase under these conditions (Gupta, 2001) .

    In biphasic systems comprising a net negativel y charged co-polymer (pI 4.4) and PYA, albumin partitioning was regulated by the pH. At pH 5-6, both serum albumin and total protein were directed almost quantitatively towards the lower ampholytic polymer-rich phase. At more alkaline pH values, both albumin and total protein partitioned toward the upper PYA

    6 ~----------------------------.

    4 .... -------1.----- .....

    2

    ~ ~ 0 .s

    6 7 -2

    -4

    -6----------------------------~

    pH

    Fig. 3. Partitioning of a mixture of proteins of different isoelectric points in PEl (4%)-PEG (4%) based ATPS. (.) Bovine serum albumin; ( .... ) Myoglobin ; (e) a-chymotrypsin.

  • 92 INDIAN J BIOTECHNOL, JANUARY 2002

    phase. At pH 7.0, however, an approximate 7-fold increase in the partition coefficient for albumin was accompanied by a 3-fold increase iQ total protein. This resulted in a 1.35-fold purification of human serum albumin with almost quantitative recovery in the upper phase (Hughes & Lowe, 1989). In the PEG-cashew gum biphasic system, partitioning of the protein increased as the pH was increased from 6 to 8. This resulted in the electrostatic repulsion of the negatively charged BSA by the negatively charged bottom cashew gum rich-phase into the top PEG-rich phase (Sarubbo, 2000).

    Role of Salt A number of studies have shown that the partition

    of proteins in polyelectrolyte-based ATPS's depends on type and concentration of the salt. For the partitioning of BSA in the PEI-HEC based ATPS at pH 5.5 (BSA is negatively charged at pH 5.5), supplementation of NaCI did not significantly influence the partitioning of the BSA. Phosphate salts on the other hand strongly increased the partition in favour of the HEC-rich top phase. Phosphate ions were more efficient in screening the charge on the PEl molecules and, therefore, decreased the electrostatic attraction between the protein and the PEl resulting in an increase in the partitioning in favour of the top PEG-rich phase (Oissing & Mattiasson, 1994).

    A suitable selection of the type and concentration of the salt, can lead to an increase in the specificity of the purification of a protein from a mixture of proteins. In PEI-HEC based A TPS , in a mixture of BSA, lactate dehydrogenase and myoglobin, BSA and lactate dehydrogenase prefer the top HEC-rich phase at 0.4 M of sodium phosphate whereas myoglobin remains in the bottom PEl-rich phase at pH 6.5 (Oissi ng & Mattiasson, 1994). In a system composed of two net anionic copolymers, in the presence of 1M NaCI the specific activity almost doubled in the lower phase since the partition coefficient of the total protein was increased to 2.4, while for trypsin it remai ned less then 1. In an anionic copolymer-PYA system at pH 5.8, in the presence of 1M NaCI, the trypsi n partition coefficient was increased almost 10-fo ld while the partition coefficient for total protein decreased 4-fold. This resulted in the 3.4 fold purification of the enzyme in the upper phase. Similarly, in the case of a cationic copolymer PYA based ATPS at pH 6.0, inclusion of the salt in the system resulted in a 3-fold increase in the specific activity (Hughes & Lowe, 1989). Therefore, the

    inclusion of the salt in the sys tem can be used for the increased and specific partitioning of proteins.

    Electrostatic Potential Difference Proteins, being charged molecules, experience

    electrostatic ion-ion and ion-dipole solute-solvent interactions in the ATPS, in addition to all intermolecular interactions experienced by non-ionic species. Electrochemical partitioning occurs when a charged solute encounters an interfacial potential difference generated by the uneven distribution of the salts or polyelectrolytes in the phase system (Luther & Glatz, 1994). This unequal partitioning of ions along with the requirement of electroneutrality in the phases gives ri se to an electrostatic potential difference (an interfacial potentia l) between the phases (Brooks et ai, 1984). The partitioning effect increases with the strength of the distribution potential, which depends on the choice of the added salt or other ionic species like polyelectrolytes (Haynes et ai, 1991). Albertsson (1986) developed a general relationship between the partition coefficient of a charged biomolecule and the electrostatic potential difference as:

    where Kp is the partition coefficient of the biomolecule, zP is the charge on the protein and ~ is the parti tion coefficient of the biomolecule when 6. = o or zP = O.

    The role of electrostatic potential difference on the partitioning of proteins has been studied by a number of workers in non-ionic polymer based ATPS but such studies are completely lacking in the polyelectrolyte based ATPS. Technical procedures used in experimental measurements of an interfacial electrostatic potential difference in ATPS 's are generally based on two basic approaches : (i) analysis of the partitioning of a solute of known and variable charge (Johansson, 1985); and (ii ) direct measurements with reversi ble, non-polarizable electrodes (Bamberger et aI, 1984). In our work on polyelectrolytes based ATPS, the electrostatic potential difference measurements were carried out based on the method used by Bamberger et al (1984) to elucidate its role in the partitioning of proteins. The electrostatic potenti al difference and partitioning coefficients for the partitioning of BSA in PEr-PEG based ATPS were measured in the presence of salts (Fig. 4).

  • GUPTA el al: POL YELECTROL YTE BASED AQUEOUS TWO-PHASE SYSTEM 93

    Salt Concentration (mM)

    _SL-----------------------------~-4

    Fig. 4. Partitioning of BSA and electrochemical potential difference as a fun ction of salt concentration in PEl-PEG based ATPS at pH 7.0. Dashed lines represent the partition coefficient and solid lines represent the electrostatic potential difference between two phases. Salt: (. ) Sodium chloride; ( ... ) Sodium sulphate; (e) Sodium phosphate.

    BSA, which is negatively charged at pH 7.0, partitioned completely into the bottom positively charged PEl-rich phase in the presence of NaCI even at concentrations as high as 500 mM. However, in the presence of divalent and polyvalent anions, BSA partitir;ned into the bottom phase at lower salt concentration such as 100 mM. With further increase in the salt concentration of divalent/polyvalent ions, BSA also started moving into the top PEG-rich phase. PEl, being the positively-charged polymer tends to interact with negatively-charged ionic species. Therefore, anions interact with the positively-charged PEl and bind/screen the charge on the polymer molecules . The ability of the anions to 10n-bind/screen the charge on the PEl molecules decreased in the order, phosphate > sulphate > chloride. Therefore, PEl stayed maximally positively charged in the presence of NaCI and hence attracted negatively charged BSA more efficiently, resulting in 100% partitioning of the BSA into the bottom phase. This was confi rmed by measuring the electrostatic potential difference between the two phases in the presence of these salt ions. In the presence of NaCI , lesser screening of the PEl molecules resu Iled in a net positive electrostatic difference between the two phases even till 500 mM salt concentration , which was higher th an that observed with sulphate or phosphate salts. Su lphate and phosphate, on the other hand, reduced/screened the positive charge on the PEl more effic iently as can be seen from the lower values of the electrostatic potential difference and reduced the electrostatic attraction with the negatively-charged

    BSA molecules. This resulted in a decrease in the partitioning of the BSA into the bottom PEl ri ch phase. This was confirmed by the fact as the concentration of the sulphate or phosphate increased ; the concentration of the BSA was also increased in the top PEG rich phase (Fig. 4). These results clearly imply that partitioning of proteins in polyelectrolyte based ATPS shows an inverse relationship with the electrostatic potential difference (Gupta, 2001).

    Conclusion Polyelectrolyte based ATPS's serve as an attracti ve

    method of protein purification . The formation of two-phases at low polymer concentrations (as low as 0.5 %) in comparison to the traditionally used PEG-dextran/salt based systems (10-12%) are especially useful for the large-scale applications where cost of polymers is a major concern. The strong dependence of polyelectrolyte based ATPS on the electrostatic interactions results in the separation of proteins on the basis of their differential surface charge and results in their high partitioning coefficients .

    Acknowledgement One of the authors thank the authorities of Indi an

    Institute of Technology Delhi for providing the facilities to peruse the studies in the area of the review and financial support for carrying out this research work. The authors also thank Dr B Y Zaslavsky (Analiza Inc., USA) for helpful discussion (via e-mail) on the role of water structure in phase separation.

    References Albcrlsson P A, 1986. Partition of Cell s and Macromolecules (3 rd

    edn ). Wiley lnterscience, New York. Andrews A T, Harri s D P, Wright G, Pyle D L & Asenjo J A,

    2000. Affinity gel electrophoresis as a predicti ve techn ique in the fractionat ion of transgenic sheep milk protein s by affi ni ty aqueous two-phase partitioning. Biotechno! Leu, 22. 1349-1353.

    Bamberger S, Seman G V F. Brown J A & Brooks D E, i 984. The partition of sodiu m phosphate and sodium chloride in aqueous dextran poly(ethylene glycol ) two-phase systems. J Cnlloid Il1 ie1face Sci, 99,187-193.

    Baskir J N, Hatton T A & Suter U W. 1989. Protein partiti oning in two-phas ·~ aq ueous polymer systems. Biotecil l101 Bioeng , 34, 541-558.

    Belter P A, Cussler E L & Hu W S, 1988. Bioseparat ion -Downstream Processi ng in Biotechnology. Wi ley , New York.

    Brooks D E, Sharp K A, Bamberger S, Tamblyn C H. Seman G V F & Walter H, 1984. Electrostatic and electroki netic potenti als in two polymer aqueous phase systems. J Colloid In/efface Sci. 102. 1- 13.

  • 94 INDIAN J BIOTECHNOL, JANUARY 2002

    Chaufer B & Rabiller-Baudry M, 2001. Role of electrophoretic mobility of protein on its retenti on by an ultrafiltration membrane. Comparison to chromatography mechanisms. J Chromalogr B, 753, 3-16.

    Chidambara Raj C B, 1994. Protein purification by counteracting chromatographic electrophores is : quanlitati ve focu sing limi ts and protein selection at the interface. J Biochem Biophys Methods , 28, 161-172.

    Clark K M & Glatz C E, 1992. A binding model for the precipitation of proteins by carboxymethyl cellulose. Chem Eng Sci, 47,215-24.

    Conway B E, 198 1. Ionic Hydration in Chemistry and Biophysics . Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Corthals G L, Collins B M, Mabbutt B C, Williams K L & Gooley A A, 1997. Purification by reflu x electrophoresis of whey proteins and of a recombinant protein expressed in Dictyoste/ium discoideul1l. J Chroma/ogr, 773, 229-309.

    Creighton T E, 1993. Proteins: Structural and Molecular Properties (2nd edn.). W. H. Freeman & Company, New York.

    Denton K A & Tate S A, 1997. Capi llary electrophores is of recombinant proteins. J Chromatogr B. 697, 111-121.

    Di ss ing U & Mattiasson B, 1993. Poly (ethyleneimine) as a phase forming polymer in aqueous two-phase system. BiOlechno/ Appl Biochem, 17, 15-21.

    Di ssing U & Mattiasson B, 1994. Partition of proteins III polyelectrolyte-neu tral polymer ATPS's . Bioseparation, 4, 335-342.

    Edsall J T & McKenzie H A, 1978. Water and proteins. I. The significance and structure of water, its interac tions with electrolytes and nonelectrolytes. Adv Biophys, 10, 137-207 .

    Edsall J T & McKenzie H A, 1983. Water and proteins. II . The location and dynamics of water in protein systems and its relation to their stability and properties. Adv Biophys, 16, 53-183.

    Florin E, Kjellander R & Eriksson J C, 1984. Salt effects on the cloud poi nt of the poly (ethy leneoxide) + water system. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans I , 80, 2889-2910.

    Gupta Y, 2001. Probing protein polymer interactions in precipitation and aqueous two-phase partitioning of proteins. Ph D Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi.

    Gupta Y, Nath S & Chand S, 2000. Estimation of proteins in the presence of PEl. Biotechnol Lett, 22, 927-929.

    Haynes C A, Carson J, Blanch H W & Prausnitz J M, 1991. Electrostatic potentials and protein partitioning in ATPS's. A1ChE J. 37, 1401-1409.

    Hughes P & Lowe C R, 1989. Purification of proteins by aqueous two-phase partition in novel acrylic co-polymer systems. Enzyme Microb Technol. 10, 115-122.

    Huisman I H, Pnidanos P, Calvo J I & Hernandez A, 2000. Electroviscous effects, streaming potential, and zeta potential in polycarbonate track-etched membranes. J Membr Sci, 178, 79-92.

    Johansson G, 1985. Partitioning of Proteins. in Partitioning in ATPS's. Theory, Methods, Uses, and Applications to Biotechnology, edited by H Walter DE Brooks & D Fisher. Academic Press, Orlando. Pp 161-185.

    Johansson G, 1994. Use of poly (ethylene glycol) with charged or hydrophobic groups. Methods Enzymol. 228, 64-74.

    Karlsson E, Ryden L & Brewer J, 1989. Ion exchange chromatography. in Protein Purification: Principles, High

    Resolution Methods and Applications, edited by J-C Janson & L Ryden. YCH, New York. Pp 107-148.

    Kjellander R & Florin E J, 198 1. Water structure and changes in thermal stability of the system: Pol y (ethylene oxide)-water. J Chem Soc Faraday Trail S I, 77, 2053-2077.

    Kontturi A K, Kontturi K, Sievers G & Yuori sto M, 1994. Purification of a polyelectrolyte sample from complex-forming charged trace impurities by continuous convec ti ve electrophoresis. Depyrogeni zation of human albumin . Sep Sci Techno/, 29, 1029-1042.

    Krestov G, 1984. Thermodynamics of Ionic Processes in Solutions, Khimira, Leningrad.

    Lienqueo M E & Asenjo J A, 2000. Use of expert systems for the synthesis of downstream protein processes. Comp Ciwn Engg, 24. 2339-2350.

    Lim Y P, Callanan H, Lin S H, Thompson N L & Hixson D C, 1993. Preparative mini-slab gel continuous elution electrophoresis: Applicaton for the separation of two isoforms of rat hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule, cell-CAM 105, and its associated proteins. Ana/ Biochem. 214, 156-164.

    Luther J R & Glatz C E, 1994. Geneticall y engineered charge modifications to enhance protein separation in ATPS's: Electrochemical partitioning. Biotechno/ Bioeng, 44, 147-153.

    Marcus Y, 1985. Ion Solvation. Wiley, Chichester. Minh L Y, Ohtsuka T, Soyama H & Nose T, 1982. Phase

    equilibrium of poly (acrylamide)-poly (v inyl alcohol) water system. Polymer J, 14, 575-576.

    Nath S, 1995. Complexation behaviour of protein with polyelectrolyte and random acrylic po lyamph olyte using turbidimetric titration. J Chem Technol Biolechnu/, 62. 295-300.

    Nath S, Patrickios C S & Halton T A, 1995. Turb idimetric titration study of the interaction of proteins with ac rylic polyampholytes. Biotechno/ Prog, 11,99-103.

    Nath S, Schutte H, Hustedt H & Deckwer W-D, 1993. Application of continuous zone electrophoresis to preparative separation of proteins . Biotechnol Bioeng. 42, 829-835 .

    Nath S, Schutte H, Hustedt H, Deckwer W-D & Weber G, 1996. Separation of enzymes from microorganism crude extracts by free-flow zone electrophoresis. Biotechl1ol Bioeng. 51 , 15-22.

    Nath S, Schutte H, Weber G, Hustedt H & Deckwer W-D, 1990a. Correlation of migration behavior in free-flow zone electrophoresis and electrophoretic titration curve. Electrophoresis. 11,612-616.

    Nath S, Schutte H, Weber G, Hustedt H & Deckwer W-D, 1990b. Separation of enzymes from Candida boidinii crude extract by continuous flow zone electrophoresis. Electrophoresis, 11,937-941.

    Perrau M B, I1iopoulos I & Audebert R, 1989. Phase separation of polyelectrolyte/nonionic polymer systems in aqueous solution: Effects of salt and charge density. Polymer. 30, 2112-2117.

    Pouliot y, Wijers M C, Gauthier S F & Nadeau L, 1999. Fractionation of whey protein hydrolysa tes using charged UFINF membranes. J Membr Sci. 158, 105-114.

    Rastogi A & Chand S, 1989. Characterization and application of a new ATPS based on gum acacia (ex. Acacia senegal), a naturally occurring polysaccharide, and polyethyleneglycol. Biotechnol Tech. 3, 33-38.

  • GUPTA el al: POL YELECTROL YTE BASED AQUEOUS TWO-PHASE SYSTEM 95

    Regnier F E, He B, Lin S & Busse J, 1999. Chromatography and electrophoresis on ch ips: Critical elements of future integrated, microfluidic analytical systems for li fe science. Trends Biotechnol, 17, 10 I-I 06.

    Sadana A & Beelaram M 1994. Efficiency and economics of bioseparation. Some case studies. Bioseparalion, 4, 221-235.

    Sarubbo L A, Oliveira L A. Porto A L F, Durate H S, Carneiro-Leao A M A, Lima-Filho J L, Campos-Takaki G M & Tambourgi E B, 2000. New aqueous two-phase system based on cashew-nut tree gum and poly (ethylene glycol). J Chromalogr B, 743, 79-84.

    Scopes R K, 1994 . Protein Purification: Principles and Practi ce. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi.

    Shimura K, 1990. Progress in e lectrophoresis. J Chromalogr, 510, 25 1-270.

    Sternberg M & Hershberger D, 1974. Separation of proteins with PAAs. Biochil11 Biophys Acta. 342, 195-206.

    Wil son K & Goulding K H, 1986. A Biologi st's Guide to Principles and Techniques of Practical Biochemistry. Cambridge University Press, New Delhi.

    Yang T H, Lee C J & Ming C I, 1998. New approach to counteracting chromatographic electrophoresis . Sep Sci Technol, 33, 18 19-183 1.

    Zaslavsky B Y, 1995 . Aqueous Two-Phase Partitioning: Phys ical Chemistry and Bioanalytical Applications. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York.

    Zaslavsky B Y, Bagirov T 0 , Borovskaya A A, Gulaeva N D, Miheeva L H, Mamhudov A U & Rodnikova M N. 1989. Structure of water as a key fac tor of phase separat ion in aqueous mixture of two nonionic pol ymers. Polvmer. 30. 2 104-2 111.

    Zaslavsky B Y, Mestechki na N M & Rogozhin SV. 1983 . Characteristics of protein-aqueous medium interacti ons measured by partition in aqueous ficoll-dextran biphas ic system. J Chrol11alogr. 260, 329-336.