38
Electromigration 1 Tim Turner Keithley Instruments [email protected]

Electromigration 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Electromigration 1

Electromigration 1

Tim Turner

Keithley Instruments

[email protected]

Page 2: Electromigration 1

Electromigration

Vacancy

Al

Self Diffusion

Page 3: Electromigration 1

Black’s Equation

Lifetime = A (1/J)n e-εa/KT

Where: J = Current Density

n = Current Density Exponent

εa = Thermal Activation Energy

K = Boltzmann’s Constant

T = Absoulte Temperature

Page 4: Electromigration 1

Grain Boundary Diffusion

Grain

Grain Boundary

Page 5: Electromigration 1

Electromigration - Effect of Temp

Extracting fundamental physical parameters for use in reliability & TCAD models from wafer level results – e.g., bulk and grain diffusion constants.

Page 6: Electromigration 1

Bamboo Effect

Log Time

50%

1%

10%

32%

68%

90%

99%Normal

Probability

Narrow Line

Wide Line

Page 7: Electromigration 1

Phase Diagrams of Binary Alloy Systems

Page 8: Electromigration 1

AI-Cu Phase Diagram

G. Borelius et. al. Handlinger NR 169, 1943

Page 9: Electromigration 1

Al/Si Phase Diagram

Al

Al + Si

0.5% Si

450 C

100% Al

Page 10: Electromigration 1

Interface Diffusion

Ti/TiNINTERMETALLIC

INTERMETALLIC

Al/Cu(0.5%)

Ti/TiN/Ti

Page 11: Electromigration 1

INTERMETALLICS

Ti/TiNINTERMETALLIC

INTERMETALLIC

Al/Cu(0.5%)

Ti/TiN/Ti

Ti/TiN

INTERMETALLIC

Al

Ti/TiN/Ti

INTERMETALLIC

Page 12: Electromigration 1

Electromigration Test Structure 1

Page 13: Electromigration 1

Electromigration Test Structure 2

T

Lower Average Temperature

Steep Temperature Gradient

Page 14: Electromigration 1

Electromigration Lifetime Distribution vs. Log Time

Log Time

50%

1%

10%

32%

68%

90%

99%Normal

Probability

Structure 1

Structure 2

Page 15: Electromigration 1

Log-Normal Distribution

• Lifetimes of a Line Follow a Gausian Distribution

• Distributions are a function of Line Length

Page 16: Electromigration 1

Accelerated Electromigration

• SWEAT Test - Drives Constant Acceleration Factor - Recommended for Processes with Poor Line Width Control (Wet Etched Metal)

• Isothermal Test - Forces Constant “Temperature” - Recommended for Dry Etched Metal Processes

• Constant Current Test - Most Easily Extrapolated Test Results - Not Recommended for Highly Accelerated Tests Which Have high Joule Heating

Page 17: Electromigration 1

Highly Accelerated Tests

• Joule Heating Produces Temperature Gradients

• Temperature Gradients Produce Flux Divergancies

• Flux Divergancies Reduce Test Lifetime

• Black’s Equation Assumes Consistent Temperatures and Current Densities - Can not be applied to Joule Heated Tests

Page 18: Electromigration 1

Cu Electromigration

• Higher Recrystalization Temperature

• Intermetallics on Three Sides

• Adhesion to Top Silicon Nitride Layer Not Good (surface migration)

• Line Thickness Effect

• Sidewall Short Issue

Page 19: Electromigration 1

Electromigration Sidewall Fracture

I

Expansion of Wide Cu Line Causes Fracture of Sidewall Oxide Allowing Shorts

Page 20: Electromigration 1

Expansion Test for Sidewall Strength

• Test Structure: Wide Metal Line Between 2 other Wide Metal Lines

• Ramp up Current Through Line to Heat the Line

• Measure Temperature by the Change in Resistance and the TCR

• Calculate Stress based on Thermal Expansion and Measured Metal Space

Page 21: Electromigration 1

Electromigration Interactions

• Line Width and Thickness Impacts Current Density- Photolithography Effects-Etch Effects-CMP Effects

Page 22: Electromigration 1

METAL LINE WIDTH MEASUREMENT

Narrow Line

Wide Line

Force Low

Wide Measure Low

Wide Measure High

Wide Force High

Narrow Measure Low Narrow Measure High

Narrow Force High

WIDE AND NARROW LINES ARE EACH ATLEAST 800u LONG

Page 23: Electromigration 1

2 Resister Line Width

Page 24: Electromigration 1

Cross Bridge Line Width

Page 25: Electromigration 1

Joule Heating Effects

• Joule Heating Effects are Generally Seen at About 0.022 degrees C/watt/sq. u of area/u of Oxide Thickness Under the Conductor

• All Conductors Have a TCR (Temperature Coefficient of Resistance)

• Heating Causes Resistance Increase Which Causes Higher Power Dissipation (Constant Current) and Thus More Heating

• Heating Causes Inaccurate and Unstable Resistance Measurements Leading to Inaccurate and Unstable Line Width, Contact Resistance...

Page 26: Electromigration 1

Joule Heating Effects

Van der Pauw Cross forSheet Resistivity Measurement

R @ 25 C = 10 ohms

R @ 43 C = 10.82 ohms(assume 0.5%/degree C)8.2% error

Voltage Drop@10uA = 100uV@1mA = 10mV

Temperature @10uA = 25 C@1mA = 43.1 C

Page 27: Electromigration 1

Required Voltage Resolution

Voltage Resolution Required to Measure a Metal Line Width with 0.5% Instrument Resolution

0.1

1

10

0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2

Line Width (u)

Vo

ltag

e R

es

olu

tio

n (

uV

)

Page 28: Electromigration 1

Line Width and Resistivity Measurements on Al Lines

SMU 1 Force I

SMU 2 Measure V1

SMU 3 Measure V2

Length of Test Line Drawn so that V1 - V2 = 100mV

Accuracy of Voltage Measure = 0.04% range +

0.04% Reading + (Rmat X Io) = +/- 870uV

Page 29: Electromigration 1

Box Cross Resistivity Requires a Differential Voltage Measurement

Conductor

I in

I out

V2

R = 4.53 (V/I)

Box Cross

Current Limited to prevent Joule Heating of Connecting Lines

V1

V1 - V2 = 7µV

870 µV Inst. Accuracy is Now Very Significant

Page 30: Electromigration 1

PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY ISSUES

Page 31: Electromigration 1

PHOTORESIST EROSION

FIELD OXIDE

PHOTORESIST

METAL 2

METAL 1

POLY

FIELD OXIDE

METAL 2

METAL 1

POLY

PHOTORESIST

Page 32: Electromigration 1

Reflective Notching

REFLECTIVE NOTCHING

LIGHT

MASK

PHOTORESIST

METAL

POLY POLY

Page 33: Electromigration 1

CMP Dishing

Wide Lines are Worst Case

Page 34: Electromigration 1

Cu Line Width and Resistivity Measurements

Sidewall Barrier Layers Complicate Resistivity and Line Width Measurements

Barrier Metal

Grain Boundary

Cu Cu

CuBarrier Metal

Cu

Cu Grain Size is a Function of Line Width, this impacts Resistivity

CMP Dishing Can Increase Resistivity for Wide Lines

Cu

Sidewall Barrier is thinned for Narrow Lines

Cu Cu

Barrier Metal

Barrier Metal

Barrier Metal

Barrier Metal Barrier Metal

Page 35: Electromigration 1

Cu Resistivity Changes with Line Width

A B C D

Al

Cu

Sheet Resistivity

Metal Line Width (µ)

Section A: Barrier Sidewall Thinning Section B: Cu Grain Size Reduction Section C: Increasing Effect of Sidewall Section D: CMP Dishing

0.2 2.0 5.0

Page 36: Electromigration 1

Cu Sheet Resistivity Measurement

II

VCu Sheet Resistivity = 4.53 V/I

Measures Cu/Barrier Sheet Resistivity.

Sidewall Barrier Has Negligible Effect.

Dishing Effect Detected with 2 Different Sizes Measurement Noise Levels Required to Measure Sheet Resistivity

of Cu Metal Lines (Nominal 0.02 ohms/square)

ConnectingLine Width

Box SideLength

Max. I forMeasurement

Max.Noise

Min. Box Width (100X BarrierLayer Thickness of 0.05)

1 5 4.77mA 1.1V

Typical Structure 3 15 14.3mA 3.2V

Max. Box Width (Limited by80 Scribe Lane)

7.2 36 34mA 7.5V

Page 37: Electromigration 1

Cu Line Width Measurement by Capacitance

A

PolyPoly

Metal 2 Metal 2

A

Scribe Lane Fingered Capacitors of Two Sizes Used to Measure Line Width

Capacitance Noise and Resolution < 2.7fF Required to make this measurement on a typical Scribe Lane Capacitor

Page 38: Electromigration 1

Electromigration Process Control

• Highly Accelerated Test to Measure Material Effects (Isothermal with Wide/Narrow Structure)- Grain Size and Texture (Wide Lines) - Intermetallic Growth (Narrow Lines)

• Cu Lines Need Sidewall Strength Test

• Multiple Metal Line and Thickness Measurement Structures to Look for Process Interactions that will Impact Current Density