22
Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 104 1. THE NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL MARGIN: TECTONIC, VOLCANIC, AND PALEOENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK 1 Olav Eldholm, 2 Jorn Thiede, 3 and Elliott Taylor 4 - 5 INTRODUCTION A major goal of both the Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) and the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) has been to elucidate the temporal and spatial geologic history of the birth of an ocean. This fundamental objective can only be seriously ad- dressed by sampling the sedimentary and underlying basement rocks at the passive continental margin. Rock samples shed light and place constraints on models of the geodynamic pro- cesses acting during the important phase of transition from con- tinental rifting to continental drifting. However, most of the world's passive margins are Mesozoic in age and covered by thick sedimentary sequences requiring deep drilling to reach basement. Drilling of this kind has generally been unattainable with the technology available during DSDP and the initial phase of ODP. During the last 20 yr the Norwegian-Greenland Sea (Fig. 1) has been surveyed extensively; in particular, a large number of high-quality seismic profiles cover the eastern continental mar- gin. The investigations have proven that the ocean is an excellent laboratory to study a number geological events associated with the creation and evolution of an ocean basin. Because it is a rel- atively young ocean, about 57 Ma, the sediment thickness at the outer margin is locally quite small. Thus, basement drilling is achievable using a vessel like JOIDES Resolution. This was dem- onstrated on ODP Leg 104 when we drilled a characteristic seg- ment of the Norwegian continental margin at the Wring Pla- teau in the summer of 1985. A particularly important observation in the seismic records is the existence of buried structural highs along regions of the outer margins in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea (Fig. 1). These features are often locally underlain by sequences of seaward- dipping reflectors also described along many other passive mar- gins (Hinz, 1981). It is generally accepted that the marginal highs are related to the initial formation of the Norwegian- Greenland Sea during the early Eocene; however, a number of diverging models have been proposed for the high's evolution and the relationship with the continent/ocean boundary. Throughout most of the Cenozoic period the Norwegian- Greenland Sea has acted as a major pathway for the influx of cold polar water into the North Atlantic Ocean as well as the advection of warm water from the North Atlantic to the polar deep-sea basin (Fig. 2). The temporal and spatial evolution of this water exchange has had profound paleoenvironmental ef- fects on the world's ocean as a whole. During this period both the surface- and bottom-water circulations were governed by 1 Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989. Proc. ODP, Sci. Results, 104: College Station, TX (Ocean Drilling Program). 2 Department of Geology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 3 GEOMAR Research Center for Marine Geoscience, Kiel, Federal Republic of Germany. 4 Ocean Drilling Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. 5 Now at School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195. two major tectonic events, the break-through of a deep-water passage between northeast Greenland and Svalbard, and the submergence of the Greenland-Scotland transverse ridge com- plex. Furthermore, the location of the ocean within the realm of the late Neogene Northern Hemisphere glaciations has also left its detailed imprint in the marine sedimentary record. Thus, the Norwegian-Greenland Sea is expected to yield paleoceanographic and paleoclimatological data having fundamental influence on a far larger region. During DSDP Leg 38 a series of holes was drilled in several geological provinces in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea (Talwani, Udintsev et al., 1976). That drilling program was primarily de- signed to test and put constraints on the plate tectonic evolu- tionary history. The fact that most sites were placed in locations of condensed sediment sections and were discontinuously cored precluded high-resolution studies of the paleoenvironment. More- over, the sub-basement structure of the marginal highs was un- known prior to the advent of deep penetration multichannel seismic data. When such data arrived, however, a new drilling leg focusing on the Vdring Plateau and the Jan Mayen Ridge was proposed. Unfortunately, because of problems in obtaining a research license the drilling had to be abandoned. As more geophysical data became available, it was recog- nized that drilling at the outer Vdring Plateau might provide in- sight into the history of a passive margin in general and that pri- mary sub-basement features were within reach of the drillstring. The Norwegian margin drilling proposal remained as a high-pri- ority target with the DSDP Passive Margin Panel and was car- ried over to the initial phase of ODP. A Norwegian Sea Working Group* under the Atlantic Regional Panel was charged with formulating a drilling program. The working group suggested a two-component drilling scenario. The primary objective was to drill a deep hole into the basement and the dipping reflectors, whereas addressing the Cenozoic paleoenvironment problems formed the secondary objective. This proposal was subse- quently accepted as the scientific rationale for the ODP Leg 104 drilling program at the Vriring Plateau continental margin. D/V JOIDES Resolution set out from Bremerhaven June 24, 1985, drilled eight holes at three sites at the Vriring Plateau, and returned to Stavanger, Norway, on August 12, 1985. The de- tailed results and preliminary interpretations of that successful coring program were presented by Eldholm, Thiede, Taylor, et al. (1987). This volume of scientific results contains more com- plete analyses, interpretations, and syntheses. We stress, how- ever, that difficulties in stratigraphic correlations and time de- mands on many ship and shore-based investigators have made the syntheses less comprehensive than anticipated. Therefore, we expect additional results to appear in the scientific literature over the next few years. Members of the Norwegian Sea Working Group: Olav Eldholm (chairman), Karl Hinz, Gerard Jacquart, John C. Mutter, Hans C. Remnevik, David Smythe, Manik Talwani, JcSrn Thiede. 5

Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 104

1. THE NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL MARGIN: TECTONIC, VOLCANIC, A N D PALEOENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK1

Olav Eldholm,2 Jorn Thiede,3 and Elliott Taylor4-5

INTRODUCTION

A major goal of both the Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) and the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) has been to elucidate the temporal and spatial geologic history of the birth of an ocean. This fundamental objective can only be seriously ad­dressed by sampling the sedimentary and underlying basement rocks at the passive continental margin. Rock samples shed light and place constraints on models of the geodynamic pro­cesses acting during the important phase of transition from con­tinental rifting to continental drifting. However, most of the world's passive margins are Mesozoic in age and covered by thick sedimentary sequences requiring deep drilling to reach basement. Drilling of this kind has generally been unattainable with the technology available during DSDP and the initial phase of ODP.

During the last 20 yr the Norwegian-Greenland Sea (Fig. 1) has been surveyed extensively; in particular, a large number of high-quality seismic profiles cover the eastern continental mar­gin. The investigations have proven that the ocean is an excellent laboratory to study a number geological events associated with the creation and evolution of an ocean basin. Because it is a rel­atively young ocean, about 57 Ma, the sediment thickness at the outer margin is locally quite small. Thus, basement drilling is achievable using a vessel like JOIDES Resolution. This was dem­onstrated on ODP Leg 104 when we drilled a characteristic seg­ment of the Norwegian continental margin at the Wring Pla­teau in the summer of 1985.

A particularly important observation in the seismic records is the existence of buried structural highs along regions of the outer margins in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea (Fig. 1). These features are often locally underlain by sequences of seaward-dipping reflectors also described along many other passive mar­gins (Hinz, 1981). It is generally accepted that the marginal highs are related to the initial formation of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea during the early Eocene; however, a number of diverging models have been proposed for the high's evolution and the relationship with the continent/ocean boundary.

Throughout most of the Cenozoic period the Norwegian-Greenland Sea has acted as a major pathway for the influx of cold polar water into the North Atlantic Ocean as well as the advection of warm water from the North Atlantic to the polar deep-sea basin (Fig. 2). The temporal and spatial evolution of this water exchange has had profound paleoenvironmental ef­fects on the world's ocean as a whole. During this period both the surface- and bottom-water circulations were governed by

1 Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989. Proc. ODP, Sci. Results, 104: College Station, TX (Ocean Drilling Program).

2 Department of Geology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 3 GEOMAR Research Center for Marine Geoscience, Kiel, Federal Republic

of Germany. 4 Ocean Drilling Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. 5 Now at School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

98195.

two major tectonic events, the break-through of a deep-water passage between northeast Greenland and Svalbard, and the submergence of the Greenland-Scotland transverse ridge com­plex. Furthermore, the location of the ocean within the realm of the late Neogene Northern Hemisphere glaciations has also left its detailed imprint in the marine sedimentary record. Thus, the Norwegian-Greenland Sea is expected to yield paleoceanographic and paleoclimatological data having fundamental influence on a far larger region.

During DSDP Leg 38 a series of holes was drilled in several geological provinces in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea (Talwani, Udintsev et al., 1976). That drilling program was primarily de­signed to test and put constraints on the plate tectonic evolu­tionary history. The fact that most sites were placed in locations of condensed sediment sections and were discontinuously cored precluded high-resolution studies of the paleoenvironment. More­over, the sub-basement structure of the marginal highs was un­known prior to the advent of deep penetration multichannel seismic data. When such data arrived, however, a new drilling leg focusing on the Vdring Plateau and the Jan Mayen Ridge was proposed. Unfortunately, because of problems in obtaining a research license the drilling had to be abandoned.

As more geophysical data became available, it was recog­nized that drilling at the outer Vdring Plateau might provide in­sight into the history of a passive margin in general and that pri­mary sub-basement features were within reach of the drillstring. The Norwegian margin drilling proposal remained as a high-pri­ority target with the DSDP Passive Margin Panel and was car­ried over to the initial phase of ODP. A Norwegian Sea Working Group* under the Atlantic Regional Panel was charged with formulating a drilling program. The working group suggested a two-component drilling scenario. The primary objective was to drill a deep hole into the basement and the dipping reflectors, whereas addressing the Cenozoic paleoenvironment problems formed the secondary objective. This proposal was subse­quently accepted as the scientific rationale for the ODP Leg 104 drilling program at the Vriring Plateau continental margin.

D/V JOIDES Resolution set out from Bremerhaven June 24, 1985, drilled eight holes at three sites at the Vriring Plateau, and returned to Stavanger, Norway, on August 12, 1985. The de­tailed results and preliminary interpretations of that successful coring program were presented by Eldholm, Thiede, Taylor, et al. (1987). This volume of scientific results contains more com­plete analyses, interpretations, and syntheses. We stress, how­ever, that difficulties in stratigraphic correlations and time de­mands on many ship and shore-based investigators have made the syntheses less comprehensive than anticipated. Therefore, we expect additional results to appear in the scientific literature over the next few years.

Members of the Norwegian Sea Working Group: Olav Eldholm (chairman), Karl Hinz, Gerard Jacquart, John C. Mutter, Hans C. Remnevik, David Smythe, Manik Talwani, JcSrn Thiede.

5

Page 2: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR

W

NORTH

Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly updated from Eldholm et al. (in press). Sim­plified bathymetry from Perry et al. (1980).

THE NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL MARGIN The outer Norwegian continental margin between 62° and

70°N is prominently offset by the Jan Mayen Fracture Zone sys­tem separating the M<6re Margin to the south from the region to the north comprising the Vriring Plateau Margin and the Lofo-ten-VesteraJen Margin (Fig. 1). These margin segments, which have distinct bathymetric, physiographic, and structural fea­tures, are generally thought to form separate geologic provinces.

North of the Jan Mayen Fracture Zone a spectacular mar­ginal plateau, the Vdring Plateau, protrudes from the continen­tal slope distinguishing the central part of the Norwegian mar­gin. The Vriring Plateau Margin consists of a wide, relatively deep shelf and an inner, moderately grading slope interrupted by the plateau, defined by the 1200- and 1600-m contours. Far­ther seaward, the plateau is bounded by an outer steep slope, at water depths between 1600 and 3000 m, toward the Lofoten and Norway basins (Figs. 1, 3).

Structural Framework The East and Central Jan Mayen fracture zones (Figs. 1, 3)

define the southwestern extent of the plateau whereas no obvi­ous structural boundaries have been recognized under the west­ern or northwestern flanks.

Beneath the outer margin off Norway, there are two large buried basement highs which are elevated with respect to the ad­jacent oceanic crust (Fig. 1). The highs at the McSre and Vdring margins mark the western termination of large pre-Cenozoic re­gional sedimentary basins extending toward the coast of Nor­way in the east. Two first-order geologic structures, the Faeroe-Shetland and Vriring Plateau escarpments, separate the mar­ginal highs and the pre-opening Mefre and Vriring basins on the landward side (Fig. 3). In the north, the Vriring Basin rises to­ward the structurally elevated Lofoten-VesteraJen shelf.

Globally, the most thoroughly investigated marginal high is probably that at the Vdring Plateau. We refer to Hinz et al.

6

Page 3: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL MARGIN FRAMEWORK

Figure 2. Variability of the modern Norwegian-Greenland Sea sea ice cover (Lamb, 1972).

(1984, 1987), Mutter et al. (1984) and Skogseid and Eldholm (1987) for discussions of geophysical data, models and sum­mary of earlier studies. In the seismic record the top of the outer basement high is defined by a strong reflector, EE (Fig. 4), documented by DSDP drilling to represent lower Eocene vol-canics (Talwani, Udintsev et al., 1976). EE is underlain by sea­ward-dipping reflector sequences (Figs. 4 and 5) and the inner part of the main wedge rests on a band of low-frequency reflec­tors of which the uppermost is named K. A relatively thin sec­tion of Cenozoic sediments covers the high. It has been com­mon to subdivide the outer margin into zones according to the character of the acoustic basement and/or sub-basement fea­tures in the seismic record (Figs. 4 and 5). The most seaward re­gion, Zone IV, is characterized by oceanic basement. Zone III represents wedges of seaward-dipping reflector sequences below reflector EE. Between the apex of the inner wedge and the Wring Plateau Escarpment there is a sequence of short, irregu­lar, and often gently landward-dipping reflectors between EE and K. The reflector band associated with K has only been rec­ognized from below the innermost part of Zone III to the Wring Plateau Escarpment. Another typical horizon extends some tens of kilometers into the Wring Basin landward of the escarpment. This reflector, denoted inner flows and interpreted as the continuation of EE at the marginal high, designates Zone I.

The marginal highs off Norway were emplaced during the early Tertiary breakup between Norway and Greenland when separation took place within a system of older sedimentary ba­sins. The history of those basins has gradually become better known, largely due to commercial exploration activities on the shelf (Bden et al., 1984; Bukovics and Ziegler, 1985). The region has been a depositional area since the Carboniferous, and its structural evolution is dominated by several rifting events which failed to culminate in sea-floor spreading. Subsequent to the cessation of the Caledonian Orogeny, sedimentation started on an epeirogenic subsiding surface. Late Paleozoic tectonism re­sulted in a series of rotated fault blocks filled in with sediments. From late Paleozoic to early Mesozoic time the relief became gradually smoother forming a large regional basin in the Early Jurassic. Extensional tectonism dominated in the middle and Late Jurassic, culminating in the Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous tectonic phase. These events created most of the present system of basins and highs at the margin (Figs. 3, 5) which were cov­ered by marine sediments in a regionally subsiding epicontinen-tal basin during the Cretaceous and early Paleocene.

At the onset of the Tertiary, the crust between Norway and Greenland was again being thinned. This rifting phase contin­ued, evolving into generation of oceanic crust during the nega­tive polarity interval between magnetic anomalies 25 and 24B, close to the Paleocene-Eocene transition (Talwani and Eldholm,

7

Page 4: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

- i n -5°W 0 5°E 10 15 -7o° M

7 2 i — i <MT L^ i ' ^ v j _ ^ ° v - ^ % ^ 3 ^ ^jfe^^——'—P7^—'—"TT-1—^—"""^—cJ7W—'—I

f^A(^//W.V\ I^V^ LOFOTEN ..,V.,-•' ' ' ^ Z ^ x " •••-•"■" ^ .■') -W'

PLATEAlK V f T Q ^ ^ £ ▼

66-\\\_> \\\^J^-/wW\// < \^"\(i • / // / / ^S ° "66

\ \ \ y M ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ S d • W ^ ' ' J ^ X / / ( yYTrondel * V *

/ C - ^ - - ^ J l f f F '■"' ( •••'' //■"'*' ••' / ^ \ / n \ V V \ (\ I MAIN STRUCTURAL FEATURE " ^ > P ^ > yS-La-l JJyy'' j-'' ••"" / ^ •■' •••'" / * r~^ ) ) I I 1 / / ^ MAGNETIC LINEATION

64- ^ ^ \ \ i l M n ' " ' ' ' 1^1^C--'"' ■•*/ ■•■'"'" ••'*S--^^X^Mr~-jrxo / i n / ^ -—- MCS PROFILES .54 I r R RIDGE \ \ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 2 3 ^ ^ • • • ' ' C ^ / ^ ^ M 12^V r^ )( / / ^ > v ^ X ^ BATHYMETRY (100 m)

\ \ /V ( 4 ' B " ' / / ^Ti^ \toxz~~' / / l( 0 $ % £ W ^ # t ^ > 3600 m V V ( V V ^ - ^ — A / ^ / / Basin / / \ „<2$>"

i ' i I N i N S i \ I ^ - r <s=h——-f I ^ _ J fci I l I CXL LJ i Mrf^ I l I l l l i i i -10 - 5 0 5 10 15

Figure 3. Bathymetry of the Wring Plateau continental margin and adjacent regions of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea (Perry et al., 1980). Marginal escarpments, main struc­tural elements, sea-floor spreading type magnetic lineations, ODP drill sites (642, 643, 644), and location of multichannel seismic reflection profiles NOR-JM 9 and 10 (Fig. 4) shown. Based on Skogseid and Eldholm (1987). NR: Nordland Ridge, TB: Traen Basin; HT: Halten Terrace; VFZ: Wring Fracture Zone; LFZ: Lofoten Fracture Zone, F-SE: Faeroe-Shetland Escarpment.

Page 5: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

Figure 4. Multichannel seismic reflection profiles NOR-JM 9 and 10. The profiles were recorded by the University of Oslo onboard F/F Hhkon Mosby in 1986 and run through all three Leg 104 drill sites. Shotpoint numbers on the top of the profile refer to Figure 3. The profiles reveal the main geologic features of the Outer Vdring Plateau as indicated on the simplified interpreted section below. OC: Oceanic crust, DR: Seaward-dipping reflector sequence, K: Reflector K, EE: The top of the lower Eocene flow series, IF: Inner flows, A: lower Miocene unconformity. Numbers I-IV refer to the zonation in Figure 5 discussed in the text. A detailed interpretation of the seismic profiles is presented by Skogseid and Eldholm (this volume).

LOFOTEN B. OUTER V0RING PLATEAU VPE V0RING BASIN

Page 6: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR

70° N

Figure 5. Simplified Wring Plateau Margin structural map (Skogseid and Eldholm, 1987; this volume) including ODP (642, 643, 644) and DSDP (338-343) drill sites. Zones I-IV refer to a division of volcanic units at the level of reflector EE and below. VFZ: Wring Frac­ture Zone; LFZ: Lofoten Fracture Zone.

1977). Since that time, the Norwegian-Greenland Sea gradually widened and deepened during a complex plate tectonic evolu­tion that is characterized by two main phases having different relative plate motions and local migration of the plate boundary (Talwani and Eldholm, 1977; Nunns, 1983). These events have greatly influenced the present structural framework of the mar­gins (Eldholm et al., 1984, 1987).

In terms of the Vtfring Plateau margin we particularly point to the following events:

1. A small shift of the plate boundary took place at the Wring Pla­teau just subsequent to anomaly 24A time, causing a duplication of the

24A-B anomaly sequence seaward of the Wring Plateau Escarpment (Hagevang et al., 1983).

2. A very complex spreading history occurred south of the Jan Mayen Fracture Zone including fan-shaped spreading, westward axial migration and development of the Jan Mayen Ridge microcontinent.

3. Local tectonism took place, possibly influenced by stress patterns induced by the two previous events.

The margin landward of the escarpments is dominated by a number of Mesozoic structural elements along which the move­ments appear to have ceased at mid-Cretaceous time. Little structural activity has been reported in conjunction with the early Tertiary opening, therefore the Mdre and Vdring Plateau

10

Page 7: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL MARGIN FRAMEWORK

margins are often thought to be a nonextensional type of the passive continental margin. Mapping by Skogseid and Eldholm (this volume), however, shows that a moderate amount of exten­sion was associated with the breakup at the outer Wring Pla­teau margin. Furthermore, a later phase of deformation con­taining elements of compression caused local inversion and thrusting in the Mdre and Wring basins.

The Mrire Basin, which is the direct southern continuation of the Wring Basin, is largely unstructured except for the steep eastern flank. It has been a prominent depocenter since Late Ju­rassic time, probably containing 9-10 km of Cretaceous and Ce-nozoic sediments. The deposition is related to a phase of rapid basin subsidence that started during the mid-Cretaceous time. On the other hand, the pre-Cretaceous sequence is thin, reflect­ing early Mesozoic uplift and erosion of a late Paleozoic basin.

The Wring Plateau margin consists of two regional geologic provinces separated by a structurally complex transition zone (Figs. 3, 5). Regionally, the eastern province is a platform-like area comprising several ridges and sub-basins such as the Nordland Ridge and Helgeland Basin. The province was structured by the Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous movements after being devel­oped as a depocenter in Late Triassic-Early Jurassic time. In general, the cover of younger sediments in the eastern province is thin compared with the Wring Basin to the west of the transi­tion zone. This basin was formed by extension which caused block faulting and rapid subsidence in Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous time.

Since the opening of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, the mar­gin has received an increasingly thicker sediment cover largely prograding from the east. The total Cenozoic sediment thick­ness in the Mdre Basin reaches a maximum of about 3.5 km, compared with an average thickness of 2-2.5 km in the Wring Basin (Boen et al., 1984; Eldholm and Mutter, 1986). We note in particular that the Faeroe-Shetland and Wring Plateau mar­ginal highs may not have been entirely buried before late Oligo-cene/early Miocene time. It is also significant that most of the Cenozoic sediments are of Neogene and Quaternary age, reflect­ing a higher rate of deposition and subsidence the last 10 m.y.

Oceanographic Framework Plate tectonic movements during the Cenozoic have resulted

in an Atlantic Ocean whose oceanographic characteristics differ greatly from those of the Pacific and Indian oceans. The open­ing of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea was the final step in estab­lishing pathways for the exchange of surface and bottom waters across all climatic zones. The opening also formed a contiguous Atlantic Ocean connecting the polar deep-sea basins of both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The tectonic and volcanic processes generating the deep-sea basin between Greenland and Europe have also resulted in the construction of major sills sep­arating the Norwegian-Greenland Sea from the main North At­lantic Ocean to the south and the Arctic Ocean to the north. However, the geological evolution of the Greenland-Scotland Ridge system (Bott et al., 1983) and the Fram Strait is poorly known. Furthermore, morphologically well-expressed fracture zones and the active mid-ocean ridge system have compartmen­talized the Norwegian-Greenland Sea proper into a number of smaller sub-basins (Fig. 1).

As a consequence of the plate tectonic evolution and the geo­graphic position, the Norwegian-Greenland Sea is characterized by a peculiar hydrography having an important impact on the Northern Hemisphere climate (especially Greenland and North­west Europe), as well as on the deep-water renewal of almost the entire world ocean. Properties of Norwegian-Greenland Sea sur­face and bottom waters have responded rapidly and drastically to the Northern Hemisphere late Cenozoic paleoclimatic changes, resulting in very fast and virtually complete rearrangements of

major water mass boundaries and currents. These changes are expected to be documented in the pelagic and hemipelagic sedi­ment cover, providing a wider perspective to the studies of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea depositional environments.

Two major current regimes dominate the modern surface cir­culation of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea (Fig. 6). The Norwe­gian Current transports temperate water masses from the area south of the Greenland-Scotland Ridge along the Norwegian continental margin north into the Arctic Ocean, as initially de­scribed by Scoresby (1820). The temperate water masses, how­ever, are balanced by the cold and ice-covered East-Greenland Current, which trails the east Greenland continental margin transporting Arctic water masses through the Denmark Strait into the North Atlantic Ocean. This oceanographic asymmetry has profound climatic consequences and is responsible for the dramatically different climates on either side of the North At­lantic Ocean at the present time.

In the Wring Plateau region two nearly subparallel current systems define the surface circulation along the Norwegian con­tinental margin. The Norwegian Coastal Current is centered on the shelf, and the dominating Norwegian Current flows farther west over the continental slope and the Wring Plateau (Fig. 6). Both currents carry temperate water from the North Atlantic Ocean into the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, but are clearly dis­tinguished by the reduced salinities of the Norwegian Current. The Norwegian Current is well-developed and narrow over the Wring Plateau and steep hydrographic gradients separate it from the cold polar water masses of the main Norwegian-Greenland Sea. However, the water-mass boundaries show rapid seasonal fluctuations and complex systems of gyres are often formed (Mork, 1981).

The bottom waters of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea and the Arctic Ocean are renewed rapidly (Koltermann, 1987), although the oceanographic processes causing this rapid vertical circula­tion are not well understood. It has earlier been assumed that dense and cold water masses were sinking to the ocean floor in the Greenland Sea (Mosby, 1961; Aagaard et al., 1985) filling the entire deep-water area and flowing over the Greenland-Scot­land Ridge into the North Atlantic (Meincke, 1983) (Fig. 7). However, recent investigations suggest that an important pro­portion of the renewed deep-water originates from brine forma­tion on the continental shelves (Swift et al., 1983; Midtun, 1985). The Arctic Bottom Water that overflows the Greenland-Scotland Ridge entering the North Atlantic, has been traced into the Pacific and Indian oceans as well, demonstrating the hydrographic impact of the modern Norwegian-Greenland Sea on the world ocean.

The situation described above has a short geologic history that developed in direct response to changes in the basin geome­try and the evolution of the Cenozoic paleoclimate. Although plate tectonic considerations give reasonable estimates about the Cenozoic basin configuration, precise timing and history of the vertical motion for the northern and southern parts of the ocean are still lacking. The subsidence of the Iceland-Faeroe Ridge is poorly known, although it appears to have been a barrier for water circulation during most of the Tertiary and complete sub­mergence may not have occurred before the late Miocene (Thiede and Eldholm, 1983). The region between northeast Greenland and northern Svalbard started opening after anomaly 13 time, however final continental separation and initiation of the deep-water exchange may have been achieved much later (Myhre and Eldholm, 1988).

Framework for Reconstruction of the Depositional Paleoenvironment

As most paleoenvironmental inferences are derived from sea-floor samples and DSDP drilling (Talwani, Udintsev et al.,

11

Page 8: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR

60°W 30°E

Figure 6. Present-day surface-current patterns in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea compiled from a number of sources (Kel­logg, 1975; 1976). The box indicates the ODP Leg 104 paleoenvironmental transect.

1976), one should keep in mind the geographical bias in avail­able data from the Norwegian-Greenland Sea. First, there is al­most no information from the western, ice-covered parts of the ocean. Second, there is an order of magnitude more informa­tion from east of the present plate boundary than from the western region. Thus, much of the analyzed material originates from areas which have been, at least at times, under influence of the northerly moving temperate surface currents during the last few million years.

The oldest sediments sampled during DSDP Leg 38 are of early Eocene age and suggest that fully pelagic and relatively warm water conditions existed there then. The similarity of ma­rine pelagic fossil assemblages on either side of the Greenland-Scotland Ridge (Berggren and Schnitker, 1983) suggests that the sill was discontinuous then. Thiede et al. (1986) showed that the

main part of the Paleogene, and possibly the lowermost Neo-gene, sediments originate from a limited number of source re­gions on the continental shelf.

The mid-Tertiary depositional environment is less known be­cause a lower Neogene hiatus spans the transition between pre-glacial and glacial deposits (Schrader et al., 1976). South of the Greenland-Scotland Ridge, glacially influenced material was deposited 2.3-2.4 Ma (Shackleton, Backman, et al., 1984). On the other hand, DSDP Site 344 (Schrader et al., 1976) and Arc­tic cores (Clark et al., 1980; Thiede et al., in press) yield evi­dence of glacial conditions as early as late Miocene-early Plio­cene time.

The initiation of a glacial-type regime in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea changed the depositional conditions. Depositional patterns in glacial and interglacial times were controlled by the

12

Page 9: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL MARGIN FRAMEWORK

SALINITY Figure 7. Schematic circulation and water mass structure in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea and the Arctic Ocean (Aagaard et al., 1985).

surface-water circulation. In addition, there is also a strong re­sponse to the glacial-interglacial climatic changes during the late Neogene and Quaternary. In fact, this ocean underwent the fastest and most dramatic oceanographic changes caused by the variable climate (Fig. 8) (CLIMAP, 1976). Stratigraphic work (Kellogg, 1975, 1976; Bjrirklund and Goll, 1979) revealed that

the Norwegian Current existed only during selected peak inter-glacials, whereas the surface waters remained polar or ice cov­ered for most of the latest Neogene and the Quaternary. The properties and mode of formation of the bottom water during this period is not settled (Jansen and Erlenkeuser, 1985), al­though a two-phase step-wise transition from the last glacial

13

Page 10: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR

Figure 8. A: Reconstruction of the late Quaternary paleoceanography of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea (Kellogg, 1980). B: Modern and last glacial maximum in the Northern Hemisphere environment (CLIMAP, 1976).

14

Page 11: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

■ 0 : >■■■ '""*■'■■■■ ■ '■■■ ' ' ■ ■ ■ ' "

Figure 8 (continued).

Page 12: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR

maximum to the Holocene might be inferred (Jansen et al., 1983). Finally, the sediments suggest relatively stable deposi­tional environments in the Holocene.

The Tertiary and Quaternary sediment cores of the Norwe­gian-Greenland Sea document mainly the evolution of the ma­rine depositional environment, which appears to have been domi­nated by a glacial mode of circulation for most of the time since 2.5-2.6 Ma. Recent observations (Funder et al., 1985) suggest, however, that northeastern Greenland was covered by boreal for­ests during the late Pliocene and early Pleistocene, which con­tradicts the oceanic data. Hence, more work must be carried out before a detailed correlation of the paleoclimate over the adja­cent continents and the Norwegian-Greenland Sea paleocean-ography is possible.

DRILLING OBJECTIVES A N D SITE SELECTION The two main scientific objectives of Leg 104 were to drill

deep into the marginal high to investigate the initial margin de­velopment, and to obtain information relating to the Cenozoic, particularly the Neogene and Quaternary, paleoenvironment.

Although seaward-dipping reflector sequences had been doc­umented from a number of passive margins (Hinz, 1981), the actual composition of these formations remained to be proven, although many investigators had suggested a volcanic nature for the sequence. This inference was supported by DSDP Leg 38 drilling that showed that the top of the unit, reflector EE (Fig. 4), was basalt. Furthermore, DSDP Leg 81 drilled into the up­permost part of a series of seaward-dipping reflectors at the Hatton Bank margin, recovering mainly subaerial tholeiitic flow basalts and minor interbedded sediments (Roberts, Schnitker, et al., 1984).

Specifically, the margin evolution goals were:

1. The composition and structure of of the seaward-dipping reflec­tor sequence;

2. The time, elevation, and crustal environment during the emplace­ment of the sequence;

3. The origin of the seismic reflector pattern characterizing the se­quence;

4. The nature of reflector K at the base of the dipping wedge; 5. The composition and structure of the rocks beneath reflector K

and their emplacement history; 6. The crustal nature of Vriring Plateau marginal high.

These data were expected to provide crucial constraints on possible models for the evolution of the Vdring Plateau mar­ginal high and the seaward-dipping series. Furthermore, the re­sults would yield a greater insight to the early evolution of the continental margin and the nature and location of the conti­nent/ocean boundary.

The paleoenvironmental objectives included:

1. The history of vertical motion of the outer margin. This target is also of key importance for understanding the early history of opening;

2. The depositional history of a passive continental margin in the polar-subpolar realm and its response to the evolution of a marginal plateau;

3. The paleoceanographic history of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea; particularly, the development of the Norwegian Current as the continua­tion of the Atlantic Gulf Stream system into the northern polar deep-sea basins;

4. The Cenozoic paleoclimatic history; 5. The initiation and variability of the Northern Hemisphere glacia-

tions; 6. The Cenozoic evolution of pelagic faunas and floras in response

to the paleoclimatic and paleoceanographic processes in the Norwe­gian-Greenland Sea; and

7. Obtaining a data base for comparison with the Southern Hemi­sphere pelagic fossil records.

To meet these goals within the time frame of a single drilling leg, a transect of three sites was selected (Figs. 3-6). All sites were located on the basis of good-quality multichannel seismic profiles. Table 1 relates site locations and adjacent multichannel seismic profiles. The detailed site approaches and underway geophysics work were described by Eldholm, Thiede, Taylor, et al. (1987). Due to problems with locating Site 643 on the steep outer flank of the plateau, the actual site location is located off profile NH-1 on which it was targeted. However, in 1986 the University of Oslo recorded new continuous multichannel seis­mic profiles through all three sites (Fig. 4).

The deep penetration site (642) was placed over the inner­most, thinnest part of the seaward-dipping wedge. The actual site location had to satisfy two requirements: (a) We wanted to sample the dipping sequence in a representative location, and (b) the site should allow us to drill to reflector K and into the underlying rock if the drilling progressed satisfactorily.

Site 642 forms the center of the paleoenvironmental transect that includes Site 643 at the lower outer flank of the Vdring Pla­teau and Site 644 in the Veiring Basin near the base of the inner continental slope. Because of safety considerations, the scien­tific research license granted by the Norwegian Petroleum Direc­torate specified a maximum drilling depth of 250 m within the Wring Basin.

The premise for the transect is that the location of the Vtfring Plateau is well suited to study the depositional environments of surface-water current systems as well as of bottom water. The marginal plateau is elevated above the adjacent turbidite-cov-ered abyssal plains and was therefore expected to accumulate pelagic and hemipelagic sediments not interrupted by turbidites. On the other hand, it is known that downslope mass movements have occurred even on gentle slopes elsewhere along the Norwe­gian margin. Thus, we attempted to avoid the most disrupted seismic stratigraphic sections when selecting Site 643. Finally, the concept of a drill-site transect (Fig. 6) would provide enough lateral spacing to establish the horizontal gradients between dif­ferent surface-water masses and the vertical gradients between different layers of the water column which once filled the Nor­wegian-Greenland Sea.

Table 1. Leg 104 drill site locations relative to the near­est single and multichannel seismic lines. An asterisk indicates that the line passes through the site.

Site

ODP

642

643

644

DSDP

338 339

340

341

342

343

MCS-profile

BGR-1 NOR-JM-10 NH-1-79 BGR-76-38 C162 NOR-JM-10 NH-1-79 NOR-JM-9 B-10-81 NH-1-79

I

C165 C165 BGR-79-8 C165 BGR-79-8 C165 C174 C165 BGR-76-38 C167

Shotpoint

1635* 1932* 7485 7380 5215 3870* 9430 465i2* 4115 5600

5050 3620

170 3610

150 4000 7030 5490 5030 1110

SCS-profile

V2705 V2803

V2705

V2705 V3011 V3011 V3011

Date/time

17-9/0130 18-8/0610

17-9/0940

17-9/0720 22-9/1145 26-9/0710 26-9/0800

16

Page 13: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL MARGIN FRAMEWORK

DEEP SEA DRILLING PROJECT LEG 38 RESULTS

During DSDP Leg 38, six sites were drilled at the northern part of the Vriring Plateau (Talwani, Udintsev et al., 1976). Of these, three sites (339, 340, 341) were in the Vriring Basin 40-60 km landward of the Vdring Plateau Escarpment; two sites (338, 342) over the marginal high at the outer plateau; and one site (343) at the foot of the outer slope, at the transition to the Lofo­ten Basin (Fig. 5). The Leg 38 drilling data complement those of Leg 104, thus we summarize the results here.

Table 2 shows key drilling information and Figures 9 and 10 illustrate the cored lithological units and their biostratigraphi-cally determined ages.

In the Vriring Basin, two sites were in a prominent diapir province discovered by Talwani and Eldholm (1972). Piston cores from the diapirs revealed middle Eocene diatomaceous clay (Bjefrklund and Kellogg, 1972). The drilling confirmed that the diapiric material consists of diatomaceous oozes. Site 341, on the other hand, was drilled west of the diapirs in undisturbed flat-lying sediments, a setting not unlike that of ODP Site 644. After penetrating a glacial sequence (Fig. 9), the hole termi­nated in middle Miocene diatomaceous oozes and diatomites. Coring was suspended because the sediments near the bottom of the hole had a strong petroliferous odor (Morris, 1976). Moreover, relatively biogenic gas concentrations were prevalent at all the sites.

At the Outer Vdring Plateau, Site 338 yielded the most com­plete sedimentary section. The sediments are comprised of ter­

rigenous Eocene material, predominantly pelagic Oligocene and Miocene sediments, and an upper section of terrigenous Plio­cene-Pleistocene sediments. Site 342 recovered only Neogene and Quaternary material. Both sites terminated in strongly al­tered alkalic basalt. K/Ar dating indicated middle Eocene ages of 46.6 and 44.0 Ma at sites 338 and 342, respectively (Kharin et al., 1976). This age is at odds with the biostratigrapically dated lower Eocene sediments sampled just above the basalt in Site 338 (Fig. 10).

The most seaward site, 343, sampled a glacial terrigenous section over middle Miocene hemipelagic sediments. A distinct hiatus separates the latter from terrigenous lower Eocene mate­rial above a basaltic basement dated as 28.5 Ma by Kharin et al. (1976). Again there is a pronounced discrepancy between the ra-diometric ages and that of the overlying sediments. Talwani and Udintsev (1976) noted that this difference might be explained by later extrusive volcanic activity or a large amount of alteration in the dated rocks. We note they characterize the basalts at Site 338 as normal oceanic floor tholeiites. In view of the Leg 104 results, the strong alteration in the very uppermost part of the volcanic section has probably contributed to these age discrep­ancies.

PRINCIPAL DRILLING RESULTS, LEG 104 A total of eight holes were drilled at three sites during 43

drilling days. In the sediment section, the general approach was to drill with the advanced piston coring (APC) technique until the operational limit of 100,000 lb. overpull during pullout was

Table 2. DSDP Leg 38 coring summary (Talwani, Udintsev, et al., 1976).

Hole Latitude Longitude

Water depth

(m) Penetration

(m) No. of cores

Meters cored

Recovered (m)

Recovery (%)

338 339 340 341 342 343

67°47.11'N 67°12.65'N 67°12.47'N 67°20.10'N 67°57.04'N 68°42.91'N

05°23.26'E 06°17.05'E 06°18.38'E 06°06.64'E 04°56.02'E 05°45.73'E

1297 1262 1217 1439 1303 3131

437.0 108.0 104.5 456.0 170.5 284.0

45 12 11 34

8 16

427.5 108.0 104.5 313.5 75.5

132.0

208.7 50.5 67.2

213.0 48.0 59.3

48.8 46.7 64.3 67.9 63.6 44.9

341

339 3 4 0 Sandy mud.

UNIT 2 -Yellow-green diatom ooze with ash streaks.

200-

300-

1

UNIT 1 -Subunit A - 0.38.0 Mud and calcareous mud with pebbles.

Subunit B - 38.0-63.0 Siliceous ooze.

Subunit C - 63.0-232.0 Structureless dark gray calcareous mud with pebbles.

■232.0'

UNIT 2 - Layered mud, sandy mud and calcareous ooze, with pebbles.

Subunit 3A - 328-352.3 Mud and muddy ooze.

Subunit 3B - 352.3-398.8 Calcareous diatomite and diatomaceous mudstone.

Subunit 3C-398.8-456.0 Diatomaceous mudstone.

Figure 9. Summary diagrams for DSDP Sites 339, 340, and 341 in the Wring Basin (Talwani, Udintsev, et al., 1976).

17

Page 14: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR

338 UNIT 1 - Olive gray muds, sandy muds and calcareous oozes, with pebbles.

Muddy diatom ooze. 97.6

UNIT 2B - Yellow green to olive gray diatom ooze

■185.1-UNIT 2C - Calcareous diatom ooze and muddy diatom ooze. CaCO- content increases to :-20 at 210 meters.

249.I Yellow gr UNIT 20 - Yellow green diatom

ooze and muddy diatom ooze. 285.0

UNIT 3A - 285-296 lit. Glauco sandy mud and mud. UNIT 3B - 296-348 in. Mud, locally calcareous UNIT 3C - 348-400.i

or sandy. 5 m. Sandy

UNIT 3D - 400.85-401.8 m. Basalt breccia and sandy limestone.

5*

o p s:

S <

342 UNIT 1 - Locally calcareous pebbly mud and sandy mud.

UNIT 2A - 85.8-92.5 Mud and siliceous mud. UNIT 2B - 92.5-141 Diatom ooze. |UNIT 2C - 141-153.2 Diatomaceous mud.

"153.2

343

100-

200-1B-

300-"

UNIT 1 - Terrigenous mud and sandy mud with nanno-fossil ooze horizons and pebbles.

126.5-

UNIT 2 - Muddy diatom ooze with volcanic ash layers.

-202.5-UNITS 3A AND 3B - Bedded mud and rare sandy mud.

BASALT -252 .3 -

-282.0-

-\J ~

BASALT UNIT 4 - Mud, mudstone

Figure 10. Summary diagrams for DSDP Sites 338 and 342 at the Outer Wring Plateau and Site 343 at the foot of the outer flank of the plateau (Talwani, Udintsev, et al., 1976).

18

Page 15: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL MARGIN FRAMEWORK

approached. Then, drilling was continued by using the extended core barrel (XCB) system. When the volcanic section was reached in Hole 642E, drilling was continued using the rotary core bar­rel system (RCB). To obtain optimal coverage of the Neogene sediments, Sites 642 and 644 were double-cored in a staggered sampling mode using the APC technique. A summary of the coring data is presented in Table 3.

Site 642 (Fig. 11) The sampled section consists of a sedimentary sequence di­

vided into four lithological units above a volcanic sequence com­prising an upper and a lower volcanic series. The entire section had been deposited in a terrestrial environment.

Lithologic Unit I is a glacial sequence composed of upper Pliocene to Holocene interbedded dark, carbonate-poor muds and light, carbonate-rich sandy muds representing glacial and interglacial periods, respectively. Lithologic Unit II, divided into four subunits, consists of interbedded, partly mixed, upper Mi­ocene to upper Pliocene siliceous and nannofossil muds and oozes. Lower and middle Miocene siliceous muds and oozes form the bulk of lithological Unit III. At the base of this unit there is a major hiatus and the underlying sediments are lower Eocene volcaniclastic and altered volcaniclastic muds, sandy muds, and sands possibly originating from erosion of the vol­canic material below lithological Unit IV. As many as 50 dis­crete ash layers within the three upper units document late Ce-nozoic volcanism.

The recovered cores and the logging data have allowed us to establish a detailed stratigraphy of the volcanic section. The up­per series consists of 120 lower Eocene flows which are aphyric to moderately plagioclase and olivine-phyric, having N-type MORB composition. These tholeiitic lavas are of two varieties, fine and medium grained. The two flow types, which differ in granularity, crystallinity, flow fabric, physical properties, and average thickness, do not exhibit significant geochemical differ­ences. Fifty-three separate interlayered volcaniclastic sediment beds, composed primarily of basaltic vitric tuffs, constitute ap­proximately 4% of the upper series. This series corresponds to the seaward-dipping wedge of reflectors in the seismic record.

A 13.2 m-thick sediment layer separates the two series at the level of reflector K in the seismic record. The sediment layer consists of laminated mudstones containing compacted pumice fragments cut by an erosional surface above which there are vol­canic mass flows with interbedded zones rich in quartz and mica. The lower series is composed of 16 glassy, variolitic, and microcrystalline flows, 6 sediment layers, and 4 dikes. The series was probably emplaced during the earliest Eocene. Chemically, the flows form three groups, (a) a dacitic type that might repre­sent shallow partial melting of continental material; (b) a mix­

ture of this melt and the tholeiites of the upper series; and (c) an intermediate type. The sediments make up 29% of the series, containing significant amounts of continentally-derived clastic mineral grains. Two of the dikes are chemically similar to their bounding flows, whereas the others might be feeders of the up­per series.

Site 643 (Fig. 12) The recovered sediments were divided into five lithologic

units of which the upper, Unit I, represents a glacial sequence of Pleistocene to Holocene muds and sandy muds. Lithologic Unit II is separated into three subunits and contains upper Miocene and Pliocene siliceous, nannofossil, and partly diatomaceous muds and oozes. Middle and lower Miocene diatomaceous ooze characterizes Unit III. Unit IV is composed of lowermost Mio­cene monotonuous compaction-laminated mudstones, some chalk, and siliceous mudstone. This unit exhibits a high degree of con­solidation, and complex diagenetic alteration is observed below 300 mbsf. The lowermost Unit V contains Oligocene and Eo­cene zeolitic mudstone and altered pyroclastic material includ­ing a basaltic conglomerate sampled near the bottom.

Downslope mass movements may have occurred in the two upper units, disturbing the lithologic and biostratigraphic pat­terns. Fifty-six fresh tephra horizons were detected within Units I, II, and III, whereas no ash was found within the lower units.

Site 644 (Fig. 13) The recovered Quaternary and Neogene sections consist of

two lithologic units. The upper, Unit I, which comprises three subunits, is a Holocene to upper Pliocene glacial sequence of muds and oozes. Lithologic Unit II is composed of Pliocene in­terbedded siliceous oozes and mixed silecious nannofossil oozes. High concentrations of biogenic gas are characteristic of large parts of the section. These sediments are particularly suited for high-resolution studies of late Cenozoic climatic events.

SUMMARY OF MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS Leg 104 was in many ways a shake-down leg for JOIDES

Resolution and the Ocean Drilling Program. In addition, the leg was the first operation of ODP in a high-latitude environment. The scientific objectives were quite ambitious, requiring a high recovery of undisturbed cores as well as deep reentry penetra­tion and satisfactory recovery in crustal rocks. Nevertheless, the vessel and entire onboard staff performed well and most prob­lems were quickly solved. Both in terms of operations and sci­ence we believe the leg was successful.

Operationally, both the APC and XCB coring systems proved to be excellent tools, and the RCB basement penetration was faster and yielded better recovery than anticipated. The 11 reen-

Table 3. ODP Leg 104 coring summary (Eldholm, Thiede, Taylor, et ah, 1987).

Hole

642A 642B 642C 642D 642E

Latitude

67°13.5'N 67°13.5'N 67°13.2'N 67°13.2'N 67°13.2'N

Totals for Site 642

643A

644A 644B

Total fo

67°42.9'N

66°40.7'N 66°40.7'N

r Site 644

All Sites

Longitude

2°55.7'E 2°55.7'E 2°55.8'E 2°55.8'E 2°55.8'E

1°02.0'E

4°34.6'E 4°34.6'E

Water depth

(m)

1292.7 1292.7 1292.1 1292.1 1289.0

2779.8

1226.3 1225.9

No. of cores

1 25 24 20

107

177

61

34 15

49

287

Meters cored

9.5 221.1 199.6 139.0 906.9

1476.1

565.2

252.8 127.7

380.5

2421.8

Meters recovered

9.9 215.6 192.8 117.0 372.6

907.9

449.2

238.4 103.6

342.0

1699.1

Percent recovered

104 98 97 84 41

62

79

94 81

89

70

Total penet.

(m)

10.8 221.1 199.6 328.9

1229.4

1989.8

565.2

252.8 127.7

380.5

2935.5

19

Page 16: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

I > I " I u>- I I I I I I » ♦ * g Paleomag.net ics Bulk density

i>« " o £ • g o Litholoqy Units Series/suDseries (am/cm3) 2 o 3 _ 5 o $ ! _ C H Normal/ o u « _ « o <__■ tpocn Reversed 2 0 3 0 0 — = T = l I in ZZ _ - ■ ■ ~gj r—■—f

3 I T̂ T ZZ 7__— Brunhes ^ > ^ , ~"J f" — H 7-7 ZZ T ■ — Pleistocene * " » ^ ^

1 ZZ H- i.—_ § aaaaagz ̂ — — &■ ~ 7 B ZZ T-7 _.~7~_ S o i n i i v . i - - - ■ — ■ — " ^ .

_ _ _ _ _ ■ _ _ G a u s s _ Z Z B _ 3 p — — UP 1 0 B I I — MA Gilbert DI •„ , .__ I 11 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ rhocene I

■ i Epoch 5 — — — — I ' 2 ■ _-: __ _ £ ) : Epoch 6 7

" M ■ 7-r ZZ: : - - - - Epoch 7 /

16 v^- T I IIC PP A ' 7 ■ T j ^ 2 r j j / 18 | — V ^ _ - I r ? \

———H I -yj^ - fc 7 2 1 ■ I 7-r J_Z 7 ^ | middle 4 _ u

23 I ■ _ _ _ _ ^ ^ ^ , _ _ • " .—f _ Miocene J

— 7 — I ■" , k ^" ZZ 7" lower S

12 ■ _ Z _ _ _ _ _ £ _ - C 300 — 13(D> I _ : _ z - _ = - _ = - . | y lower Eocene ^

14(D) ~ ~ ■ Z-T ~ — m — , > . ? * - . . ^ — — — S —

4 * / _ » < > * . _i _ _ _ ■ > * v "» A 1 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ ■ _ _ _ _

5 - * V i S / ^ ' ! •_-_______■ —— ■■■_,>../<.. /• v

7 ^ - - _ _ l r > v * * - i _ r N^_ —I— i^___tl__ J ^*-**_^ ~ ~ ~ ^ " ~ \ \ _ ^ * - ^

n __—* ~ v< -1 <̂ __rr"'*"̂ 12 7 ,- ^ r ^ -i >' 2

__:—"*;:>'-■ - ^ E 15 I ■ *" r -, „ r l „ J 3 * - "

Page 17: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

16 ^ M M I | T " , " / *- v X r <

— — C 7 Nl r J > 4 >V

< ^ ^ \

"^~ — — ^H ^ H ^ v ^ i - r •' * ^

- 21 ■ 3̂ ">r * * 3 "■ ■ * ^ * ^ . c 2 1 g 3 ^ * 7 4 A J " 5 ^ o. 22 I I * * v <- * * X • — — - B H J

< 7 v < r Afc ——■ ^ ^ ^ ^ = _ ^ - *

£ i i — ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ v > J *■ J < — -̂ ^ _ E 500 — 25 m m.7 r

k <• / , w > . — - J P 27 ■ ■ i \ * ' " r/.'1 i> * ^ ^ ^

_ 30 I BLVVIV**-*1 => _ ^

33 ^ * v - i v v rW > h t ' ^5fc

34 *-r>'1 v > * <, " ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ A I S ■ i > l - J - 7 i J ■

600 36 ■ ■ [« * 2 * , V * 1 1 " < ^ T 37 ■■■■ i, j ., •* * J "» ^ " - \

^ ^ M , * v- * p " < "" V I , ~ A j ^ •* -i i > * r ' ** >A* v *•>< \

40 ^^m, >r * 7 < A L J

42 ■ ■ •> * > A t j A"\ ^^ ^f 43 V>* J /g^A J ^ / ^ 44 ^ ^ ^ r A

t < j 1 1 < a * ' y / ^

J L B ^ V ^ / ^^—■—i 71 I ■ " A 7 V v J ' 1

7 0 0 — — ! 4 J - < A 2 \ 48 , * - J 1 ~ \ ^ A

rA \

~50"~ — — .Ti p v " 7 v < - ^ " " *

5 3 r u A j > » \ 54 I ■ ^ v r <- r -1 ' — H E S = EC ^ B » " , " 7 l . v " » > X

5 8 m M i. 4 „ * <■ 4 1 ^ ^ .

59 ■ ■ ■ ' " " * 1 " < *: " ^ > 6 0 4 ^ ^ T 1 t ^ ^ ^ X "

800 61 ™ — l 'v < ^ * t f 7 < - ^

64 I ■»* «■ y < », A -7 >■

66 ■ ■ > ^ < V ^ - \ — ~~67" ■■■'-V J ' ' ^ A ^ A V **g7*

Figure 11. Summary diagram for ODP Site 642.

Page 18: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

I *• I u I u v I I I I I I te + ♦ » Paleomagnetics Bulk dens i ty

y « %o S«u S o Litholoqy Units Series/subseries (qm/cm3) 2 k « ^ « a « S r- Normal/ 3 5 3 a 3 3 3 a Epoch Reversed 2.0 3 .0

71 ■ ■ > L 2 *- * a •> < $ _,lf^ ~7T" — 4

A * v «■ J «■ + i Zj 900 73 | 1 , -i W * L- m — ^

^W ^H_ o <• i ' "* A a. S 7 5 A t " ,, i J 3 ^ ^

— ™ — ^ ^ H ^ i ^ , u -i ^ ' < 76 ™ ~ ™ ( v v

< A ^ < j

^ 7 8 ^ ™ 3 ^7 S. 79 ^ ^ ™ v A v A i. A A " * ^ ^ _

80 ■ ™ r " * u * y „ <^"

o 8 2 [; v r- ■> i ,. s >/

| 83 /*VvV< ^S » 1000 8 4 — ~ ' ^ ' 4 1

1 ' ^ \

85 P ^ B % P 2>

8 6 <- > v t- v -J i ^ ^ 8 7 j - i < 7 > v ^ < • "

_ 8 8 _ " " > " ; : ; : ; 5 ^ 8 9 V "» <. "> 7 N/ ^ ' ^ S L

90 ' ^ ^ ^ , A V "> t. A T P ^ ^ ^ ^

9 2 — < "' A ,. r , r - ^

93 _ _ 7 - * * * «. A S y 94 H J B V i l " ^ 7 - 1 *

1100 - 2 § _ ^ ^ » v"« 1 i r V / 9 6 ^ ^ — < < "7 > V -, < \ 97 ™ ■ < t

g « u * ■ , K • r* 9 8 ^ ^ ^ - » g < v ' 1 ' - A t * " - ^

99 w ^ m < * „ r ? Z \ $

100 ■> A c ^ «, p i- 4 1

104 ■ \ . N. series H \

iQ5 ■ ftrrrT^ ^ > s 1 0 6 ^ " " r , > y,u f: l'.\<. I 107 I B» V ^ . ^ ^ ^

1 2 0 0 — — - ^ a v ; !_a ; ^ ^ 1 0 8 ^ ^ <- ': c ' -> ? :

^ ^ ^ ^ V ^ V -> i- A 1

M ' Q I I \ \ I I I I I . I , I I \ \ ^ Dike / / Barren

Figure 11 (continued).

Page 19: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL MARGIN FRAMEWORK

tries at Hole 642E must also be noted. The leg featured the first dual-casing reentry cone installation and first VSP experiment of the ODP. It achieved the deepest basement penetrat ion ever during one leg of deep sea drilling, and as of December 1988 Hole 642E was still the deepest O D P site drilled. Finally, despite the high latitude of the operational area, which at times caused severe weather conditions, no weather downtime accrued.

Scientifically, all major objectives were achieved. We drilled through the entire seaward-dipping reflector sequence, the dis­puted reflector K, and into the underlying rocks. Despite the ex­istence of numerous hiatuses causing correlation and interpreta­tion challenges, the recovered sediment cores have provided a new and unique oppor tuni ty for detailed high-resolution stud­ies, particularly of the Neogene paleoenvironment. Both the ini­tial data presentation (Eldholm, Thiede, Taylor et al . , 1987) and the present volume are only considered first at tempts using the data collection as a basis for geological models and understanding.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Jakob Skogseid, and Christine Yokley (ODP/TAMU), for

assisting in figure preparation and Annik M. Myhre for permission to include seismic lines NOR-JM 9-10. This project has been supported by grants from the Norwegian Research Council for Science and the Hu­manities and Statoil (OE) and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, Th200/3-3-5) (JT).

REFERENCES Aagaard, K., Swift, J. H., and Carmack, E. C , 1985. Thermohaline

circulation in the Arctic Mediterranean Seas. J. Geophys. Res., 90: 4833-4846.

Berggren, W. A., and Schnitker, D., 1983. Cenozoic marine environ­ments in the North Atlantic and the Norwegian-Greenland Sea. In Bott, M.H.P., Saxov, S., Talwani, M., and Thiede, J. (Eds.), Struc­ture and Development of the Greenland-Scotland Ridge - New Meth­ods and Concepts: New York (Plenum Press), 495-548.

Bott, M.H.P., Saxov, S., Talwani, M., and Thiede, J. (Eds.), 1983. Structure and Development of the Greenland-Scotland Ridge - New Methods and Concepts: New York (Plenum Press).

BjoYklund, K. R., and Kellogg, D. E., 1972. Five new radiolarian spe­cies from the Norwegian Sea. Micropaleontology, 18:386-396.

Bjrirklund, K. R., and Goll, R. M., 1979. Ice age climates of the Nor­wegian-Greenland Sea. GeoJournal, 3:273-283.

Bukovics, C , and Ziegler, P. A., 1985. Tectonic development of the Mid-Norway continental margin. Mar. Pet. Geol., 2:2-22.

B^en, F , Eggen, S., and Vollset, J., 1984. Structures and basins of the margin from 62-69°N and their development. In Spencer, A. M., et al. (Eds.), Petroleum Geology of the North European Margin: Lon­don (Graham and Trotman), 253-270.

Clark, D. L., Whitman, R. R., Morgan, K. A., and Mackey, S. D., 1980. Stratigraphy and glacial marine sediments of the Amerasian Basin, central Arctic Ocean. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Paper, 181:1-57.

CLIMAP Project Members, 1976. The surface of the ice-age earth. Sci­ence, 191:1131-1137.

Eldholm, O., and Mutter, J. C , 1986. Basin structure of the Norwegian Margin from analysis of digitally recorded sonobuoys. J. Geophys. Res., 91:3763-3783.

Eldholm, O., Faleide, J. I., and Myhre, A. M., 1987. Continent-ocean transition at the western Barents Sea/Svalbard continental margin. Geology, 15:1118-1122.

Eldholm, O., Sundvor, E., Myhre, A. M., and Faleide, J. I., 1984. Ce­nozoic evolution of the continental margin off Norway and western Svalbard. In Spencer, A. M., et al. (Eds.), Petroleum Geology of the North European Margin: London (Graham and Trotman), 3-28.

Eldholm, O., Skogseid, J., Sundvor, E. and Myhre, A. M., (in press). The Norwegian-Greenland Sea. In: Grantz, A., Johnson, G. L., and Sweeney, J. (Eds.), The Arctic Ocean Region, Vol. L, The Geology of North America, Geol. Soc. Am.: Boulder ( ).

Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1987. Proc. ODP, Init. Repts., 104: College Station, TX (Ocean Drilling Program).

Funder, S., Abrahamsen, N., Bennike, O., and Feyling-Hanssen R. W, 1985. Forested Arctic: Evidence from North Greenland. Geology, 13:542-546.

Hagevang, T , Eldholm, O., and Aalstad, I., 1983. Pre-23 magnetic anomalies between Jan Mayen and Greenland-Senja fracture zones in the Norwegian Sea. Mar. Geophys. Res., 5:345-363.

Hinz, K., 1981. A hypothesis on terrestrial catastrophes: Wedges of very thick oceanward dipping layers beneath passive margins—their ori­gin and paleoenvironmental significance. Geol. Jahrb., E22:3-28.

Hinz, K., Dostman, H. J., and Hanisch, J., 1984. Structural elements of the Norwegian Sea continental margin. Geol. Jahrb., A75: 193-211.

Hinz, K., Mutter, J. C , Zehnder, C. M., and NGT Study Group, 1987. Symmetric conjugation of continent-ocean boundary structures along the Norwegian and East Greenland margins. Mar. Pet. Geol., 4:166-187.

Jansen, E., and Erlenkeuser, H., 1985. Ocean circulation in the Norwe­gian Sea during the last deglaciation: Isotopic evidence. Palaeo-geogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoeco/., 49:189-206.

Jansen, E., Sejrup, H. P., Fjaeran, T , Hald, M., Holtedahl, H., and Skarbri, O., 1983. Late Weichselian paleoceanography of the south­eastern Norwegian Sea. Norsk Geol. Tidsskr., 63:117-206.

Kellogg, T.B., 1975. Late Quaternary climatic changes in the Norwegian and Greenland seas. In Weller, G., and Bowling, J. A., (Eds.), Cli­mate of the Arctic. Proc. Alaska Sci. Conf., 24th, Geophys. Inst. Univ. Alaska, 3-26.

Kellogg, T. B., 1976. Late Quaternary climatic changes: Evidence from deep-sea cores of Norwegian and Greenland seas. Geol. Soc. Am. Mem., 145:77-110.

Kharin, G. N., Udintsev, G. B., Bogatikov, O. A., Dmitriev, J. I., Ras-chka, H., Kreuzer, H., Mohr, M., Harre, W, and Eckhardt F.-J., 1976. K/Ar age of the basalts of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, DSDP Leg 38. In Talwani, M., Udintsev, G , et al., 1976. Init. Repts. DSDP, 38: Washington (U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 755-759.

Koltermann, K. P., 1987. Die Tiefenzirkulation der Gronland See als Folge des thermohalinen Systems des Europaischen Nordmeeres. [Ph.D. thesis], Univ. Hamburg.

Lamb, H. H., 1972. Climate: Present, past and future. (Vol. 1): London (Methuen).

Meincke, J., 1983. The modern current regime across the Greenland-Scotland Ridge. In Bott, M.H.P., Saxov, S., Talwani, M., and Thiede, J. (Eds.), Structure and Development of the Greenland-Scotland Ridge - New Methods and Concepts: New York (Plenum Press), 637-650.

Midtun, L., 1985. Formation of dense bottom water in the Barents Sea. Deep-Sea Res., 33:1233-1241.

Mork, M., 1981. Experiments with theoretical models of the Norwegian Coastal Current. In: Saetre, R., and Mork, M. (Eds.), The Norwe­gian Coastal Current, (Vol. 2): Bergen, Norway (Univ. of Bergen), 518-530.

Morris, D. A., 1976. Organic diagenesis of Miocene sediments from Site 341, Vdring Plateau, Norway. In Talwani, M., Udintsev, G , et al., 1976, Init. Repts. DSDP, 38: Washington DC (U.S. Govt. Print­ing Office), 809-814.

Mosby, H., 1961. Recording the formation of bottom water in the Nor­wegian Sea. Mittlg. Inst. Meereskunde, Univ. Hamburg, 1:289-291.

Mutter, J. C , Talwani, M., and Stoffa, P. L., 1984. Origin of seaward-dipping reflectors in oceanic crust off the Norwegian margin by "subaerial sea-floor spreading". J. Geophys. Res., 89:483-502.

Myhre, A. M., and Eldholm, O., 1988. The western Svalbard margin (74-80°N). Marine Pet. Geol., 5:134-156.

Nunns, A. G , 1983. Plate tectonic evolution of the Greenland-Scotland Ridge and surrounding regions. In Bott, M.H.P., Saxov, S., Tal­wani, M., and Thiede, J. (Eds.), Structure and Development of the Greenland-Scotland Ridge - New Methods and Concepts: New York (Plenum Press), 11-30.

Perry, R. B., Flemming, H. S., Cherkis, N. Z., Feden, R. H., and Vogt, P. R., 1980. Bathymetry of the Norwegian-Greenland and western Barents seas. Map: Washington (U.S. Naval Res. Lab.).

Roberts, D. G , Schnitker, D., et al., 1984. Init. Repts. DSDP, 81: Washington (US. Govt. Printing Office).

Schrader, H-J., Bjdrklund, K. R., Manum, S. B., Martini, E., and van Hinte, J., 1976. Cenozoic biostratigraphy, physical stratigraphy, and paleoceanography in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, DSDP Leg 38 paleontological synthesis. In Talwani, M., Udintsev, G , et al., 1976, Init. Repts. DSDP, 38: Washington (U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 1197-1211.

23

Page 20: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR

Scoresby, W., 1820. An account of the Arctic Region with a history and description of the northern whale fishing. Vol. 1: Edinburgh (Con­stable).

Shackleton, N. J., Backman, J., et al., 1984. Oxygen isotope calibration of the onset of ice-rafting and the history of glaciation in the North Atlantic region. Nature, 307: 620-623.

Skogseid, J., and Eldholm, O., 1987. Early Cenozoic crust at the Nor­wegian continental margin and the conjugate Jan Mayen Ridge. J. Geophys. Res., 92:11471-11491.

Swift, J. H., Takahashi, T , and Livingston H., 1983. The contribution of the Greenland and Barents Sea to the deep water of the Arctic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 88:5981-5986.

Talwani, M., and Eldholm, O., 1972. The continental margin off Nor­way: A geophysical study. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 83:3375-3608.

Talwani, M., and Eldholm, O., 1977. Evolution of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 88:969-999.

Talwani, M., Udintsev, G., 1976. Tectonic synthesis. In Talwani, M., Udintsev, G., et al., 1976, Init. Repts. DSDP, 38: Washington (U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 1213-1242.

Talwani, M., Udintsev, G , et al., 1976. Init. Repts. DSDP, 38: Wash­ington (U.S. Govt. Printing Office).

Thiede, J., and Eldholm, O., 1983. Speculations about the paleodepth of the Greenland-Scotland Ridge during Late Mesozoic and Ceno­zoic times. In Bott, M.H.P., Saxov, S., Talwani, M., and Thiede, J. (Eds.), Structure and Development of the Greenland-Scotland Ridge - New Methods and Concepts: New York (Plenum Press), 445-456.

Thiede, J., Diesen, G. W., Knudsen, B. E., and Snare, T W, 1986. Pat­terns of Cenozoic sedimentation in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea. Mar. Geol., 69: 323-352.

Thiede, J., Clark, D. L., and Herman, Y., (in press). Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic paleoceanography of northern polar oceans. In: Grantz, A., Johnson, G. L. and Sweeney, J. (Eds.), The Arctic Ocean Re­gion, Vol. L, The Geology of North America, Geol. Soc. Am.: Boulder ( ).

Date of initial receipt: 8 March 1987 Date of acceptance: 7 September 1988 Ms 104B-110

24

Page 21: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL MARGIN FRAMEWORK

2 0

4 0

6 0

1 0 0

1 2 0

1 4 0

1 6 0

1 8 0

2 0 0

2 2 0

2 4 0

2 6 0

2 8 0

3 2 0

4 0 0

4 2 0

4 4 0

4 6 0

4 8 0

5 0 0

5 2 0

5 4 0

-

1 |

1 |

1 |

1

-

61

Core

s

1

2

3

4

5

Reco

very

Littioiogy

7

8

9 |

1 0

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

1 8

19

20

~_L

:_-_-_

H~*~r -\_r

■yj- - \»r ■v-r -ys

v -v^

■yj- -yy ■yj- -yj-

21 |™ ' "

22

23

2 4

25

26

2 7

2 8

29

30

31

3 2

3 3

3 4

3 5

■yj- -v-r ■v-r - w

■ v -y^ H ~ v ^ r -yj-

1 -\J- -y-r H " * - / " -yj-

1 -v- r -yj-H ~ v ^ r -yj-

H - v ^ ~ v

36 1

37 ■ 3 8

3 9

4 0

41

42 1

i^ r

H :

r r l

S: L_l 7

43 r

4 4

4 5

4 6

4 7

4 8

4 9

5 0

51 ]

5 2

5 3

- J ^ ^

5 5

5 6

57/581 5 9

6 0

HI

I T - :

: 7 -

V >

^ :

Units

1

MA

MB

IIC

I I I

IV

V

Paieomagnetics Epoch Normal/

Reversed

Series/Subseries

"^■| Brunhes 1

Matuyama

Gauss

=

Gilbert

Pleistocene

Pliocene

upper

middle

Miocene

lower

upper

Oligocene

lower

upper

middle

Eocene

lower

.

Bulk density tgm/cnr)

1 .4 1 .6 1 .8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 I | I 1 ^ 1 I | I | I | I

M i l l i Fife

Seismic reflector

UP

MM

A

TO

A'

ME

Figure 12. Summary diagram for ODP Site 643.

25

Page 22: Eldholm, O., Thiede, J., Taylor, E., et al., 1989 …...O. ELDHOLM, J. THIEDE, E. TAYLOR W NORTH Figure 1. Physiography and structural features in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea, slightly

$ • Lithology Units Paleomagnetics Series/Subseries Bulk density Seismic o g Epoch Normal/ (gm/cm3) reflector­

's Reversed 1 .4 1 .6 1 .8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 0 ~ 1 I F ^ - T L ■ I ' I "H-i ' i ' i ' I ■ I

4 0 5 ml . '-L 7*7 L [ Brunhes \>><>^

- 8 B ' H — ~~"" IB / ^ 80 — 9 I fc H I _L I - ^

"^ H H .U. ~ J Pleistocene ^-^>

100 fl H - - ^2 7"1 ~T ^ ^ w B l ~ ' " JaramilloB f

8- 13 | [ T T I I 7-7 I _ L /

| i4 | B— I : T4 I- ^ P ^

"? 140 — I H I 77 1_ - ^ § 16 ■ m ■ — ■ , , —L «. C

160 — — B B—- ~- —■ ~ i c s - ^ ^

19 p T I T-: H 7_rx Olduvai I N. 180 20 I m-^- Zl — Z ' ^ ^ " ^ B f^

24 B B~ —'- ~ - - ^ J UP 25 B E l H H 7 Pliocene \

220 — 3 f j ] E H H 1 ^ y>

240 32 B— ■ - - T V - II GaUSS J 33- - "M | 7 L V |

1 I I I 1 I I . I ■ I , I ■ I ■ I I I I l l • Reflectors are not marked.

Figure 13. Summary diagram for ODP Site 644.