Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Ecological sanitation-an option for allProfessor Dr. Petter D. JenssenThe Norwegian University of Life SciencesCourse: ”Appropriate sanitation for the developing world”, August 14, 2006
1,2 billion people do not have access to
clean water
3,4 million people die anually due to diseses caused by lack of proper water and sanitation
2,5 billion peoplelack proper sanitation
UN summit Johannesburg - goals:• Halve the number of people without access to clean water
within the year 2015• Halve the number of people lacking proper sanitation
within the year 2015
20 - 40% water consumption in sewered cities is due to the water toilet
(Gardner 1997)
2
DO less than 1 mg/l
BOD - 250 mg
Kathmandu, Nepal
Dry season:
Photo: M. Pandey
Kuching Sarawak Malaysia
Conventional wastewater handling -end-of-pipe
(Source: Werner et al. 2004)
Sustainable development
The development of human society with nature for the benefit of both.
(W.J. Mitsch and S.E. Jørgensen in Ecological engineering, 1989)
3
Design of sustainable sanitation systems
• System approach
(Urban Water 2001)
Resources in wastewaterAnnual discharge from one person
• Nitrogen (N) 4.5 kg• Phosphorus (P) 0.6 kg• Potassium (K) 1.0 kg• Organic matter (BOD) 35 kg
Loss of Soil Fertility (slow but dramatic, global scale)Can be counteracted by returning treated biowaste
(Map from WWW.FAO.ORG)
30 million USD
The wastewater resourceThe fertilizer value of the nutrients dichargedto the sewer systems in Norway
per year
2.5 billion USD
The wastewater resourceThe fertilizer value of the blackwater from900 Mio people in rural China
per year
(UNESCO 2001)
Recycle?
It is enough plant nutrients in domestic sewage and organic household waste to grow food for the world population. (Wolgast 1991)
Production of 1kg mineral nitrogen fertilizer requires
38 MJ = 10.5kWh of energy. (Refsgaard 1997)
Phosphorus is a limited resource. Present mineral P-sources
will last 100 - 200 years. (Bøckman et al. 1991)
4
Designof sustainable sanitation systems
• System approach• Decentralized systems• Recycling and resource
saving
Ruralarea
Urbanarea
Closing the loop
The toilet!
Contribution fromthe toilet
* 90 % of N* 80 % of P* 80 % of K* 40-75 % of org. matter * Majority of the pathogens
Source separation of wastewater
(Alsen and Jenssen 2005)
(Alsen and Jenssen2005)
Source separation of wastewater
An ordinary toilet uses 6 - 20 litres/flush
5
Design of ecological sanitation
• System approach• Decentralized
systems• Recycling and
resource saving• Source separation
(Source: Werner et al. 2004)
Future toilet types(comercially available today)
• Composting /dry sanitation 0 - 0.1 liter/visit• Urine diverting 0.1 - 4.0 liter/visit• Water saving (vacuum&gravity) 0.5 - 1.5 liter/visit
Future toilet types(comercially available today)
• Composting /dry sanitation 0 - 0.1 liter/visit• Urine diverting 0.1 - 4.0 liter/visit• Water saving (vacuum&gravity) 0.5 - 1.5 liter/visit
Composting toilet at roadside facility - Sweden
Elected the best roadside facilityIn Sweden 2002
Composting toilet at roadside facility - Sweden
Clean odourlesstoilets
Volume reduction:• 70 - 90%
(Del Porto and Steinfeld 1999)
Composting toilet
6
Volume reduction:• 70 - 90%• 550 down to 55 liters
(Del Porto and Steinfeld 1999)
Composting toiletAntartica 2001
Secondary compostingDry sanitation - hygiene
• International research show that dry sanitation may give an equal or higher reduction of pathogens and a high reduction in risk of exposure.
(Stenström 2001)
REACTOR - 2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Days /08. 04. 2003 - 26. 06. 2003/
Tem
pera
ture
[0C
]
Future toilet types(comercially available today)
• Composting /dry sanitation 0 - 0.1 liter/visit• Urine diverting 0.1 - 4.0 liter/visit• Water saving (vacuum&gravity) 0.5 - 1.5 liter/visit
Urine divertion and dry composting of fecal matter atTingvall conference center Sweden
7
Urine divertion and dry composting of fecal matter atTingvall conference center Sweden
Phot
o: P
.D. J
enss
en
Ecosan toilet center Bangalore India
Faeces
Urine
Wash water
Straight-drop dry urine-diverting toilet in multi-story apartments in Dong Sheng, Northern China (SEI)
(EcoSan Res/A. Rosemarin 2005)
• Urine flushed with 1-2 dl
• Faeces - flushed with 2-4 liters
Dual flush urine -diverting system
(Jønsson et al. 1998)
Future toilet types(comercially available today)
• Composting /dry sanitation 0 - 0.1 liter/visit• Urine diverting 0.1 - 4.0 liter/visit• Water saving (vacuum&gravity) 0.5 - 1.5 liter/visit
Low flush toiletsVacuum
0.5 - 1.5 liters/flushGravity
1 liter/flush
8
• 1660 vacuum toilets• > 2km of vacuum sewer line
Vacuum technologyMarine installations
Vacuum toilets• Small diameter pipes• Piping independent of
inclination
Vacuum - 50mmGravity - 110mm
La HabanaCuba Hospitals using vacuum:
• Hospital in Vence, France• Park Hospital, Calcutta
Vacuum toilets - energy use
4 KWh/person and year
Kildesep prinsipp
Toilet waste (blackwater) +organic household waste (OHW)
Vacuum or low flush gravity toilets
Source separating system
9
Kildesep prinsipp
Toilet waste (blackwater) +organic household waste (OHW)
Liquid composting
Source separating system
Vacuum or low flush gravity toilets
Våtkompostering
PDJ 1997
VåtkomposteringLiquid composting
•Aerobic process•Temperature 50-60ºC•No odours•No nitrogen loss•Runs with a net energy surplus
7 farmer operated systems in Norway
Kildesep prinsippSource separating system
Biogas, CH4
Blackwater+OHW
Greywater
Kildesep prinsippSource separating system
Algae producing H2?Biogas, CH4
Blackwater+OHW
Greywater
Kildesep prinsippSource separating system
Biogas, CH4
Blackwater+OHW
Greywater
Agricultural application
Direct Ground Injection (DGI)
10
Direct Ground Injection (DGI)
Significant reduction in ammonia loss
Direct Ground Injection (DGI)
Yields comparable to mineral fertilizer
Yield, sum of two cuts from ley. NLH 1996
NPK 200kgBand spreading,
3.4%DGI 3.4%Boadcast 3.4%
0 fertilizer
Broadcast 8.1%
DGI 8.1%NPK 120kg
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0 50 100 150 200 250
Inorganic nitrogen, kg/ha
Dry
mat
ter
yiel
d, k
g/ha
Kildesep prinsippLocal nutrient recycling
Studentboliger KajaStudent dormitories in Norway28% water saving
050
100150200
Uso de agua por persona por dia
WC160 liter Vacuum
115 liter 6 liter
Water use/person and day
Greywater treatment - student dormitories NorwayAverage effluent valuesTotal - P 0,04 mg/lTotal - N 2,2mg/lBOD 3,9 mg/lFecal coli <100/100ml
Foto: P. Jenssen
48 studentsWetland area: 2 m2/student
PBF
Wetland
Winter
Torvetua in Bergen•42 condominiums•vacuumtoilets •wetland greywater treatment
11
Contemporary Scandinavian bathroom designusing ecological sanitation
Volvo,s Conference Center - Bokenäs
• Capacity 500 persons
• Blackwater and grinded kitchen waste to biogas production
• Struvite production (discontinued)
Struvite;Mg P NMgOH3PO4
Struvite:Mg (K, NH4) PO4
Additives:MgOH3PO4
La Habana, Cuba
”Zero emission house”16 viviendas
8 solar poweredvacuum toilets1 liter/flush
8 gravitationtoilets1 liter/flush
BiogasGreywater
Wetland
”Zero emission house”16 viviendas
8 inodoro de vacio1 liter/
8 inodoros de gravitation1 liter/
BiogasGreywater
Wetland
12
80% of the vegetables consumed in urban areas in Cuba are grown within urban areas Kildesep prinsipp
Local nutrient recycling
Greywater treatment
Total nitrogen concentrations in untreated greywater (mg/l)
Average 8,4 mg/l
Drinking water (WHO) 10,0 mg/l
(Jenssen&Vråle 2004)
Average 1,03 mg/l
Total phosphorus concentrations in untreated greywater (mg/l)
(Jenssen&Vråle 2004)
Compact systemsRotating biological contactors
Klosterenga oversiktGreywater treatment in OSLO
PretreatmentBiofilter (PBF)
Horisontalsubsurfaceflow Constructed Wetland
• 33 apartments • 100 persons• Area 1m2/person
13
Greywater treatmentPretreatment biofilter
Horizontal subsurface flow wetland filter
Septic tankPump/siphon
Level control &sampling port
Greywater treatment atKlosterenga Oslo
Effluent values:Fecal coliforms: 0Total-N: 2,5 mg/lTotal-P: 0,02 mg/l
Greywater treatment atKlosterenga Oslo
Effluent values:Fecal coliforms: 0Total-N: 2,5 mg/lTotal-P: 0,02 mg/l
Inhouse use ?
Local discharge
Irrigation
Groundwater recharge
14
Kuching Sarawak Malaysia
Norwegian concept - Ecological Sanitation in Kuching, Malaysia
Preliminary Assessment of Investment Cost
1,000 Million MYREcological Sanitation
3,000 Million MYRConventional Centralized Sewage System
Investment costof centralized sewer systems
• Collection system 80%• Treatment 20%
Wastewater treatment plant
Sewer lines
Norwegian concept - Ecological Sanitation in Kuching, Malaysia
15
Biogas plant
Pilot project Hui Sing GardenGreywater treatment
11stst chamber of oil chamber of oil and grease trapand grease trap
Pump Pump sumpsump
Final dischargeFinal discharge
(Alsen and Jenssen2005)
Ecosan - 2nd generation systems are emerging
Photo: P. D. Jenssen
16
Hookup for vacuum truck
Photos: P. D. Jenssen
Decentralized systems in urban areas - OSLO
Klosterenga
Upscaling decentralized systems
The Agricultural University of Norway
Treatment/collection site
c
Upscaling decentralized systems
The Agricultural University of Norway
Treatment/collection site
c
Upscaling decentralized systems
The Agricultural University of Norway
Treatment/collection site
c
Ecosan technology• Can be used in urban as well as
rural areas• Water saving potential -
> 90%• High potential for health
improvement -Blackwater treated separately
• Increased food security by better fertilizer availability
• Designed for sustainability, thus environmentally friendly
• Bioenergy production by integrated solutions for wastewater and organic waste
(Werner et al. 2004)
17
Ecosan - implementation• Local awareness raising
authorities, users, engineers academia
• Local capacity buidlingpractitioners, local businesses, academia
• Legal adaption - laws, regulations, building codes, administrative routines
• Business development, contractors, component production, import, joint venture
(Werner et al. 2004)
Ecosan technology• Improved health by diverting
blackwater from the water cycle• Can be used in urban as well as
rural areas
• Affordable solutions with low investment and maintenance costs
• Increased food security by better fertilizer availability
• Substantial water savings by using water saving toilets and reuse of greywater
Appropriate sanitation leads to• Bioenergy production by
integrated solutions for wastewater and organic waste
• Economic development by generation of local business opportunities
• Stakeholder involvementand system acceptance
ConclusionLeapfrog the conventional centralized sewers
Go straight to modern sanitation based on ecological principles
Ecosan educationThe Norwegian University of Life Sciences
• MSc programs • Short courses
www.ecosan.no
QuickTime™ og enTIFF (LZW)-dekomprimerer
kreves for å se dette bildet.
18
Thank you!
www.ecosan.no