Upload
maximillian-blair
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ELECTRONIC WASTE DISPOSAL AT
THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE
Victoria LiuMay 31, 2008
SCHOOL CAMPUSES AND TECHNOLOGYThere are over 2,400 four-year colleges and
university campuses in the U.S. UCI: 25,000 students enrolled
over 16,000 faculty and staff employed• Popular technology
• Computers & laptops
• Cell phones
• MP3 players
EPA KEY FINDINGS FROM 2005 Americans own nearly 3 billion electronic products
Estimated 130,000 computers discarded per DAY
Around 304 million electronics abandoned in 2005 2/3 of those electronics were still operable according to the
Consumer Electronics Association
EPA KEY FINDINGS FROM 2005
•Used/unwanted electronics: 1.9 – 2.2 million tons
• Landfills: 1.5 – 1.9 million tons discarded to landfills
• Recycled: 345,000 – 379,000 tons recycled
BASEL CONVENTION AND E-WASTE EXPORT
The Basel Convention: the international treaty that regulates disposal and export of e-waste
E-WASTE DEVELOPING DEVELOPED COUNTRY COUNTRY
• U.S. is the only developed country that has not ratified the Basel Convention and
• Of the e-waste exported, 90% goes to China.
• Workers in foreign countries dismantle waste without protective clothing and employing practices hazardous to their health.
ADVERSE EFFECTS FROM E-WASTE DISPOSAL
CHEMICAL TOXINS
Americans have been shown to have the highest levels of these compounds in their blood of any people yet tested.
•Emitted in air and groundwater
• Embedded in tissue
• Leached into food products throughout U.S.
ADVERSE EFFECTS FROM E-WASTE DISPOSAL
LEAD MERCURY CADMIUM PVC HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM
•Nervous and reproductive systems
• Kidneys, thyroid, bones
• Mental development of children and fetuses
•Neurodevelopmental problems
RESEARCH Current research addresses large-scale directives in
different countries: European Union’s Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment
directive (WEEE) Japan’s Designated Household Appliance Recycling Law
(DHARL) Current practices on university campuses
UC Berkeley: GreenCitizen: drop-off locations, community programs, marketing
incentives
UC Irvine: Environmental Health & Safety (EH&S): drop-off bins, online pick-up,
e-waste collection events and specified dates
KEY QUESTIONS: How are UCI students currently disposing of their unwanted
electronics (namely computers/laptops, cell phones, MP3 players)?
Why have they chosen that method of disposal?
What alternative forms of disposal do students know about?
What adverse effects of electronic waste do students know about?
What incentives would encourage students to recycle their electronic waste?
RESEARCH DESIGNSample:
Survey taken to classes and the ARC 164 subjects studying different majors:
Public Planning & DesignCriminology, Law & SocietyEconomicsHistoryBiologyEngineering
RESEARCH DESIGN Sample questions:
1) How do you usually dispose of your old computers/laptops? [Check all that apply]
Keep, reuse parts Donate Trash Recycling centers Other:___________________
Why? [Check all that apply] Convenience Common practice Good for the environment Maximize use of product Don’t know Other: ______________________
What are some alternative forms of disposal you know about? [Check all that apply] Electronics stores Recycling centers Donation Other: ______________________
4) What adverse effects of improper electronic waste disposal do you know about? [Free response]
RESULTS METHODS OF DISPOSAL
Results very similar across the board
8 – 15% Trashed
* Many have not had to dispose of MP3 players yet
*
RESULTS18.8% 0% 16% 25% 12.5% 30.8%
Students Who Keep/Donate Recycle vs.Students Who Throw in Trash
RESULTS WHY
For computers/laptops, cell phones, and MP3 players students chose their method of disposal for reasons of CONVENIENCE
Also a popular consideration: MAXIMAL USE OF PRODUCT
Keep
Donate Reuse
Convenient Maximal Use
RESULTS In general, students know about RECYCLING CENTERS and
DONATION as alternative forms of e-waste disposal
They also know that e-waste contains DANGEROUS CHEMICALS causes ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE BUT only in the most general sense or not at all
Demographics: Public Health and Social Ecology Majors had the best ratios of
students who knew about the adverse effects of electronic waste
“Very little. I just know it shouldn’t be thrown in regular
garbage.” “Batteries are bad for the earth?”
“Toxins but don’t know exactly what.”
“We ship it off to developing countries to be disassembled dangerously…hurting their population and environment.”
“Increase in landfills; mercury and lead in electronics; potential urban runoff.”
RESULTS
RESULTS In conclusion:
Not much trash
Students know about alternatives
Most students know about adverse effects
Students know what they should be doing but not enough about how or why • Donations and storage have their own share of problems
• CAPITALIZE ON CONVENIENCE
• Further education and publicity about adverse effects + bad practices
• MP3 players will be growing problem – should be addressed and planned for
FURTHER RESEARCH Professor Ogunseitan
Researching how to eliminate the toxins used in cell phone parts and replace with non-toxic and reusable components
Extend to computers and MP3 players
Expansion through UC System 2007: UC system adopted “Policy on Sustainable Practices”
Energy Global Warming Waste Eco-friendly purchasing http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/article/17146
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Professor Valerie Jenness Professor Joseph DiMento Professor Oladele Ogunseitan Professor Stanley Grant Professor Lisa Grant Professor Eli Simon Professor Stephen Barker Professor Scott Samuelsen Students of UCI Students of Social Ecology Honors Program
Contact: [email protected]