25
1 A Highly Efficient Ziehl-Neelsen Stain: Identifying De Novo Intracellular and 1 Improving Detection of Extracellular Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in 2 Cerebrospinal Fluid 3 4 Ping Chen 1 , Ming Shi 1 , Guo-Dong Feng 1 , Jia-Yun Liu 2 , Bing-Ju Wang 1 , 5 Xiao-Dan Shi 1 , Lei Ma 1 , Xue-Dong Liu 1 , Yi-Ning Yang 1 , Wen Dai 1 , Ting-Ting Liu 1 , 6 Ying He 1 , Jin-Ge Li 3 , Xiao-Ke Hao 2 , Gang Zhao 1 * 7 8 1 Department of Neurology, 2 Center for Clinical Laboratory Medicine, and 3 9 Department of Infectious Diseases, Xijing Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical 10 University, 15 West Changle Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China 11 12 Running title: A modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain for intracellular Mtb 13 14 These authors contributed equally to this work. 15 16 * Corresponding author: 17 Prof. Gang Zhao 18 Department of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, 15 19 West Changle Road, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710032, China; TEL: +86-29-8477 5361, Fax: 20 +86-29-8255 1806. Email: [email protected] 21 22 Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/JCM.05756-11 JCM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 11 January 2012 on May 2, 2021 by guest http://jcm.asm.org/ Downloaded from

Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

1

A Highly Efficient Ziehl-Neelsen Stain: Identifying De Novo Intracellular and 1

Improving Detection of Extracellular Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in 2

Cerebrospinal Fluid 3

4

Ping Chen1†, Ming Shi1†, Guo-Dong Feng1†, Jia-Yun Liu2†, Bing-Ju Wang1, 5

Xiao-Dan Shi1, Lei Ma1, Xue-Dong Liu1, Yi-Ning Yang1, Wen Dai1, Ting-Ting Liu1, 6

Ying He1, Jin-Ge Li3, Xiao-Ke Hao2, Gang Zhao1* 7

8

1 Department of Neurology, 2 Center for Clinical Laboratory Medicine, and 3 9

Department of Infectious Diseases, Xijing Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical 10

University, 15 West Changle Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China 11

12

Running title: A modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain for intracellular Mtb 13

14

† These authors contributed equally to this work. 15

16

* Corresponding author: 17

Prof. Gang Zhao 18

Department of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, 15 19

West Changle Road, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710032, China; TEL: +86-29-8477 5361, Fax: 20

+86-29-8255 1806. Email: [email protected] 21

22

Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/JCM.05756-11 JCM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 11 January 2012

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 2: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

2

Abstract 23

Tuberculous meningitis leads to a devastating outcome, and early diagnosis and rapid 24

chemotherapy are vital to reduce morbidity and mortality. Since Mycobacterium 25

tuberculosis (Mtb) is a kind of cytozoic pathogen and its number is very few in the 26

cerebrospinal fluid, detecting Mtb in the cerebrospinal fluid from tuberculous 27

meningitis patients is still a challenge for the clinicians. Ziehl-Neelsen stain, the 28

current feasible microbiological method for diagnosis of tuberculosis, often needs a 29

large amount of cerebrospinal fluid specimen but shows a low detection rate of Mtb. 30

Here, we developed a modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain, involving cytospin slides with 31

Triton processing, in which only 0.5 ml of cerebrospinal fluid specimens was required. 32

This method not only improved the detection rate of extracellular Mtb significantly, 33

but also identified intracellular Mtb in the neutrophils, monocytes and lymphocytes 34

clearly. Thus, our modified method is more effective and sensitive than the 35

conventional Ziehl-Neelsen stain, providing clinicians a convenient and yet powerful 36

tool in rapidly diagnosing tuberculous meningitis. 37

38

Keywords: Tuberculous meningitis; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Cerebrospinal fluid; 39

Ziehl-Neelsen stain 40

41

42

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 3: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

3

Introduction 43

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most severe form of tuberculosis and causes 44

substantial morbidity and mortality (18). Early diagnosis of and prompt initiation of 45

chemotherapy for TBM are crucial to a successful outcome. However, early and 46

accurate detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in the cerebrospinal fluid 47

(CSF) of TBM patients still remains a challenge for clinicians, which is mainly due to 48

lack of rapid, efficient and practical detection methods (30). 49

Currently, mycobacterial culture is the gold standard for detecting Mtb, but it is 50

time-consuming and requires specialized safety procedures in laboratories (19, 26). 51

Serological methods are convenient, but lack sensitivity and specificity (4, 7). Though 52

the polymerase chain reaction technique is rapid, it is costly for routine use in 53

developing countries where most tuberculosis cases occur (5, 17, 21, 24). 54

Conventional smear microscopy with the Ziehl-Neelsen stain is a rapid and practical 55

method for detecting acid-fast bacilli (AFB), especially in low-income countries, due 56

to its rapidity, low cost and high positive predictive value for tuberculosis (14). 57

However, Ziehl-Neelsen method is severely handicapped by its low detection rate, 58

ranging from 0-20 % for CSF specimens (31-33). One of the main reasons behind this 59

is that Mtb can hardly be stained by acid-fast dyes once it enters the cells. Another 60

important reason is that Ziehl-Neelsen method requires a large volume of CSF for 61

TBM diagnosis as it is incapable of detecting bacilli that are fewer than 10,000 per 62

slide or per mL of specimen (32, 33). Therefore, it is important to develop an 63

alternative cost-effective method for detecting intracellular Mtb. Additionally, 64

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 4: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

4

knowing which cell type is infected by Mtb in the CSF of TBM patients could help us 65

to unravel new anti-tuberculotic candidates (10). 66

To reveal the presence of intracellular Mtb and improve the detection of 67

extracellular Mtb from a small volume of CSF specimens, we developed a highly 68

efficient Ziehl-Neelsen stain involving the use of only 0.5 mL CSF specimens from 69

TBM cases. The formed elements in the CSF including the bacilli and cells were 70

compactly collected onto the slides by cytospinning followed by staining with 71

acid-fast dyes containing the detergent Triton X-100. Using this modified staining 72

method, AFB can be clearly revealed within the immune cells and the detection rate 73

of extracellular AFB was significantly improved as well. 74

75

Materials and Methods 76

Study subjects 77

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Xijing 78

Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xian, China and written informed 79

consent was obtained from all patients or their legal surrogates. Twenty-nine patients, 80

whose CSF specimens were culture positive for Mycobacterium by a MGIT 960 81

Mycobacteria Culture System, were diagnosed as TBM and enrolled in this study. For 82

identification of Mtb and differentiation of non-Mtb from positive cultures, 83

Ziehl-Neelsen stain and a commercial TB real-time PCR kit (Qiagen GmBH, Hilden, 84

Germany) were used. 85

Conventional Ziehl-Neelsen stain 86

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 5: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

5

Two mL of CSF specimens were centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 15 min and the sediment 87

was smeared on slides as previously described (27). All smears were stained by the 88

conventional Ziehl-Neelsen method for the presence of AFB as depicted earlier (14) 89

and observed under a light microscope. 90

Modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain 91

Cytospin was used to collect the formed elements of CSF specimens. In brief, 0.5 mL 92

CSF specimen was loaded into the chamber in which poly-L-lysine-coated slides were 93

inserted and centrifuged at 1,000 g for 5-10 min. After the media were aspirated, the 94

cells were fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde (pH 7.4) for 10 min at room temperature. 95

The cells on cytospin slides were then permeabilized with 0.3 % TritonX-100 for 30 96

min followed by conventional Ziehl-Neelsen stain, in which fast acid dye contained 97

0.3 % TritonX-100. The cells were counterstained with methyl blue for 5 min. 98

Combination of auramine-O stain and immunofluorescence 99

The cytospin slides were prepared as described above and then permeabilized with 100

0.3 % TritonX-100 for 30 min. Auramine-O (AO) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) stain was 101

performed as described by the manufacturer. After AO stain, the cytospin slides were 102

incubated with the following primary antibodies in PBS containing 2 % normal 103

donkey serum at 4°C overnight: mouse anti-CD11b (Millipore, Bilerica, MA), mouse 104

anti-ED1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), rabbit anti-CD3, and mouse 105

anti-CD20 (MaiXin Biotechnology, China). After wash with PBS, the cells were 106

treated with biotinylated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Vector Laboratories, 107

Burlingame, CA) for 3 h and then with Cy3-conjugated streptavidin (Jackson 108

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 6: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

6

ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were 109

counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma). Immunofluorescent signals were 110

observed under a laser confocal microscope (LSM 510, Carl Zeiss Microscopy). 111

Data analysis 112

All the smear and cytospin slides stained by the conventional or modified method 113

were observed under oil immersion at the magnification of 1,000 ×. A total of 300 114

visual fields on each slide were observed, among which AFB-positive fields were 115

counted by three experienced observers independently. All the data were displayed as 116

mean ± SEM and analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Differences were considered 117

statistically significant when P < 0.05. 118

119

Results 120

A total of 48 CSF samples were collected from 29 TBM patients (Table 1). When 121

analyzed by the samples, thirty-five samples (35/48, 72.92%) were culture-positive, 122

and 8 (8/48, 16.67%) were Ziehl-Neelsen smear positive while all the samples (48/48, 123

100%) were positive by our modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain. The sensitivity of the 124

Ziehl-Neelsen stain was 22.9 % [95 % C.I 8.9 – 36.7] (n = 8/35) and 16.7% [95 % C.I 125

11.29 – 22.05] (n = 8/48) against culture and the modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain, 126

respectively. The sensitivity of culture was 72.92% [95 % C.I 66.51 – 79.33] (n = 127

35/48) against the modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain. The specificity of all techniques was 128

100 % (n = 48/48). When analyzed by patients, the sensitivity of culture and the 129

modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 130

Ziehl-Neelsen stain was 27.6 % [95 % C.I 9.29 – 35.89] (n = 8/29) against culture and 131

the modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain. The specificity of all techniques was 100 % (n = 132

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 7: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

7

29/29). These data suggest a higher sensitivity of our modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain 133

than that of mycobacteria culture and the conventional Ziehl-Neelsen stain. 134

In the conventional method, a relatively large CSF volume (2 mL) was used for 135

smear slides. Ziehl-Neelsen stain showed that the AFB were sparsely distributed and 136

the integrity of immune cells was violated (Fig. 1A). In some regions of smear slides, 137

aggregated cells were often observed in AFB-positive fields (Fig. 1B). We noted that 138

in the conventional method, all the AFB observed were distributed extracellularly and 139

no AFB were found within the cells. By comparison, in the modified method, 0.5 mL 140

CSF samples were used for cytospin slides. Ziehl-Neelsen stain with Triton 141

processing showed that the immune cells were distributed evenly on the slides and 142

maintained the integrity of cellular morphology (Fig. 1C-F). Moreover, using this 143

method, we clearly observed AFB within the immune cells, including neutrophils, 144

monocytes and lymphocytes (Fig. 1D-F). Importantly, we also found that the number 145

of extracellular AFB was significantly increased in the modified method. In addition, 146

we noted that cells containing AFB displayed an abnormal morphology relative to 147

those free of AFB. For example, a larger percentage of neutrophils with more lobes 148

showed an obvious right shift (Fig. 1D, arrow) and monocytes displayed a larger cell 149

body and foam-like cytoplasm (Fig. 1E, arrow) while lymphocytes showed a smaller 150

cell body and nuclear pyknosis (Fig. 1F, arrow). These data suggest that upon and 151

following phagocytosis by the immune cells, intracellular Mtb also exerts effect on 152

the immune cells. 153

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 8: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

8

To confirm intracellular localization of AFB and exclude the possibility that the 154

bacilli inadvertently adhere to the cell surface during cytospinning, we performed 155

double labeling of AO, a fluorescent dye used for staining tubercle bacillus (28, 31), 156

and the activated neutrophil marker CD11b, monocyte marker ED1, and T 157

lymphocyte marker CD3 or B lymphocyte marker CD20. Our results showed that 158

AO+ bacilli were indeed located in the cytoplasm of neutrophils, monocytes or 159

lymphocytes, but not on the surface of these cells (Fig. 2 and 3). 160

For quantitative analysis of extracellular AFB, the conventional method identified 161

extracellular AFB in 8 of 48 CSF specimens (16.7 %) while the modified method 162

identified all the specimens (100 %, 48/48). For quantification of intracellular AFB, 163

the modified method detected intracellular AFB in 45 of 48 CSF specimens (93.8 %) 164

while none was detected by the conventional method (Table 2). Furthermore, through 165

observation of 300 fields on each slide from 48 CSF samples, we found that the 166

number of extracellular and intracellular AFB-positive fields with the conventional 167

method was 20.0 ± 63.1 and 0 fields, respectively, and 73.5 ± 58.0 (P < 0.001) and 168

24.3 ± 22.0 (P < 0.001) fields with the modified method, respectively (Fig. 4). 169

170

Discussion 171

In the present study, we developed a modified Ziehl-Neelsen method on cytospin 172

slides with Triton processing. Only using a small amount of CSF samples, our 173

modified method yielded a 93.8 % detection rate of intracellular AFB while the 174

conventional method failed to detect any intracellular AFB. Also, this method can 175

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 9: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

9

improve the detection rate of extracellular AFB from 16.7 % of the conventional 176

Ziehl-Neelsen stain to 100%. Moreover, our method had a higher sensitivity than the 177

mycobacterium culture method, and is easier to implement than AO staining, in which 178

expensive fluorescence microscopy is required. 179

We attributed the higher detection rate of Mtb by the modified method to two 180

possible reasons. First, cytospinning was employed, by which AFB within cells were 181

concentrated compactly in a small circular area on the slide with low speed 182

centrifugation. In contrast to the conventional method, by which the cells are mostly 183

destroyed, our modified method preserves the cellular integrity and consequently 184

prevents the loss of intracellular AFB from inside the cells. In addition, coating the 185

slides with poly-L-lysine further prevents cells and bacilli in the CSF from falling off 186

during staining. Second, we employed Triton X100, which permeates the cellular 187

membrane and facilitates the entry of fast-acid dye. Thus, the modified method 188

combining cytospin and Triton permeation significantly improves the efficiency of 189

Ziehl-Neelsen stain. Furthermore, the cytospin method concentrates extracellular AFB 190

in the CSF. Consequently, the CSF specimens from all the 48 specimens were found 191

positive for extracellular AFB by the modified stain, as compared to the low detection 192

rate (16.7 %, 8/48) by the conventional method. Triton processing also improves the 193

permeability of the unique bacterial wall of AFB (15), which resists staining by 194

acid-fast dyes. Thus, the modified method also improved the detection rate of 195

extracellular AFB. 196

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 10: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

10

Accumulating evidence shows that the presence of intracellular Mtb is a crucial 197

indicator of the body’s immune response to tuberculosis (26, 28). Monocytes, 198

neutrophils and lymphocytes are three major immune cell types in the CSF of TBM 199

and play different roles in the pathogenesis of TBM. As is known, monocytes are 200

regarded as the main immune cells for host defense against Mtb. However, a group of 201

studies have shown that the antigen-presenting function of macrophages is 202

significantly impaired following infection with Mtb (9, 12, 20, 22). Thus, it is 203

proposed that other immune cells may be recruited to enhance the immune response 204

against Mtb infection (16). In the present study, we revealed that Mtb was present in 205

both neutrophils and lymphocytes, indicating that these two types of cells are indeed 206

involved in the host’s immune response against Mtb. Neutrophils have both 207

bactericidal and immunomodulatory functions (3, 13, 25). When infected with Mtb, 208

neutrophils can directly kill invading Mtb via generation of reactive oxygen species 209

and release of preformed oxidants and proteolytic enzymes, and/or indirectly 210

eliminate Mtb by releasing an array of cytokines and chemokines to attract other 211

inflammatory cells. On the other hand, infected neutrophils also provide a permissive 212

site for active replication of Mtb (6, 8), which in turn induces apoptosis of neutrophils 213

(1, 2). Macrophages are capable of phagocytizing apoptotic neutrophils, resulting in 214

the eventual elimination of intracellular Mtb (29). Unexpectedly, our results also 215

showed an intracellular distribution of Mtb in CD3+ T lymphocytes. Previous studies 216

have shown that dendritic cells, a derivative from lymphocyte precursor, can 217

phagocytize Mtb and exert their antigen-presenting functions (11, 23). These findings 218

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 11: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

11

together prompt us to propose that lymphocytes may play a similar role in TBM, 219

compensating decreased antigen-presenting function of macrophages. Thus, our 220

present study suggests that in addition to monocytes, neutrophils and lymphocytes 221

may also participate in the host defense against Mtb infection. 222

223

Conclusion 224

Given the acute need for a simple, efficient and practical method for detecting Mtb 225

within the cells and from a small amount of CSF samples, our modified Ziehl-Neelsen 226

staining method can efficiently reveal the presence of AFB in the immune cells of a 227

small amount of CSF samples from TBM patients, and improve the detection rate of 228

extracellular AFB as well. Therefore, this method will be of tremendous value in 229

improving both the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. 230

231

Acknowledgement 232

The authors are grateful to Prof. Bo-Quan Jin (Department of Immunology, the Fourth 233

Military Medical University) and Prof. Zhi-Kai Xu (Department of Microbiology, the 234

Fourth Military Medical University) for valuable comments on the manuscript, and Dr. 235

Bo Cui (Associate editor for Journal of Biomedical Research, Nanjing University) for 236

his laborious work on English correction. This work was supported by a grant from 237

Discipline-Boosting Program of Xijing Hospital (No. XJZT10Z03). 238

239

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 12: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

12

References 240

1. Alemán M, García A, and Saab MA. 2002. Mycobacterium tuberculosis-induced 241

activation accelerates apoptosis in peripheral blood neutrophils from patients with 242

active tuberculosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 27(5):583-592. 243

2. Alemán M, S. P., de la Barrera SS, et al. . 2004. Mycobacterium tuberculosis 244

triggers apoptosis in peripheral neutrophils involving toll-like receptor 2 and p38 245

mitogen protein kinase in tuberculosis patients. Infect Immun. 72(9):5150-5158. 246

3. Appelberg, R., and M. T. Silva. 1989. T cell-dependent chronic neutrophilia during 247

mycobacterial infections. Clin Exp Immunol 78:478-83. 248

4. Attallah, A. M., C. A. Abdel Malak, H. Ismail, A. H. El-Saggan, M. M. Omran, 249

and A. A. Tabll. 2003. Rapid and simple detection of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis 250

circulating antigen in serum using dot-ELISA for field diagnosis of pulmonary 251

tuberculosis. J Immunoassay Immunochem 24:73-87. 252

5. Dora, J. M., G. Geib, R. Chakr, F. Paris, A. B. Mombach, L. Lutz, C. F. Souza, 253

and L. Z. Goldani. 2008. Polymerase chain reaction as a useful and simple tool for 254

rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis in a Brazilian tertiary care hospital. Braz J 255

Infect Dis 12:245-7. 256

6. Dorhoi, A., S. T. Reece, and S. H. Kaufmann. 2011. For better or for worse: the 257

immune response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis balances pathology and 258

protection. Immunol Rev 240:235-51. 259

7. El-Masry, S., I. El-Kady, M. H. Zaghloul, and M. K. Al-Badrawey. 2008. Rapid 260

and simple detection of a mycobacterium circulating antigen in serum of pulmonary 261

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 13: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

13

tuberculosis patients by using a monoclonal antibody and Fast-Dot-ELISA. Clin 262

Biochem 41:145-51. 263

8. Eum, S. Y., J. H. Kong, M. S. Hong, Y. J. Lee, J. H. Kim, S. H. Hwang, S. N. Cho, 264

L. E. Via, and C. E. Barry, 3rd. 2010. Neutrophils are the predominant infected 265

phagocytic cells in the airways of patients with active pulmonary TB. Chest 266

137:122-8. 267

9. Fulton, S. A., S. M. Reba, R. K. Pai, M. Pennini, M. Torres, C. V. Harding, and 268

W. H. Boom. 2004. Inhibition of major histocompatibility complex II expression and 269

antigen processing in murine alveolar macrophages by Mycobacterium bovis BCG 270

and the 19-kilodalton mycobacterial lipoprotein. Infect Immun 72:2101-10. 271

10. Gaspar, M. M., A. Cruz, A. G. Fraga, A. G. Castro, M. E. Cruz, and J. Pedrosa. 272

2008. Developments on drug delivery systems for the treatment of mycobacterial 273

infections. Curr Top Med Chem 8:579-91. 274

11. Hedlund, S., A. Persson, A. Vujic, K. F. Che, O. Stendahl, and M. Larsson. 2010. 275

Dendritic cell activation by sensing Mycobacterium tuberculosis-induced apoptotic 276

neutrophils via DC-SIGN. Hum Immunol 71:535-40. 277

12. Jo, E. K. 2008. Mycobacterial interaction with innate receptors: TLRs, C-type lectins, 278

and NLRs. Curr Opin Infect Dis 21:279-86. 279

13. Kasahara, K., I. Sato, K. Ogura, H. Takeuchi, K. Kobayashi, and M. Adachi. 280

1998. Expression of chemokines and induction of rapid cell death in human blood 281

neutrophils by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 178:127-37. 282

14. Koch, M. L., and R. A. Cote. 1965. Comparison of Fluorescence Microscopy with 283

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 14: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

14

Ziehl-Neelsen Stain for Demonstration of Acid-Fast Bacilli in Smear Preparations and 284

Tissue Sections. Am Rev Respir Dis 91:283-4. 285

15. Koley, D., and A. J. Bard. 2010. Triton X-100 concentration effects on membrane 286

permeability of a single HeLa cell by scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). 287

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:16783-7. 288

16. Leveton, C., S. Barnass, B. Champion, S. Lucas, B. De Souza, M. Nicol, D. 289

Banerjee, and G. Rook. 1989. T-cell-mediated protection of mice against virulent 290

Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 57:390-5. 291

17. Lorino, G., D. Lilli, D. Rivanera, P. Guarino, S. Angeletti, G. Gherardi, and F. 292

Filadoro. 1999. Polymerase chain reaction, with sequencing, as a diagnostic tool in 293

culture---negative bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Infect 5:92-96. 294

18. Marais, S., G. Thwaites, J. F. Schoeman, M. E. Torok, U. K. Misra, K. Prasad, P. 295

R. Donald, R. J. Wilkinson, and B. J. Marais. 2010. Tuberculous meningitis: a 296

uniform case definition for use in clinical research. Lancet Infect Dis 10:803-12. 297

19. Mishra, A., A. Singhal, D. S. Chauhan, V. M. Katoch, K. Srivastava, S. S. 298

Thakral, S. S. Bharadwaj, V. Sreenivas, and H. K. Prasad. 2005. Direct detection 299

and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis in bovine 300

samples by a novel nested PCR assay: correlation with conventional techniques. J 301

Clin Microbiol 43:5670-8. 302

20. Noss, E. H., R. K. Pai, T. J. Sellati, J. D. Radolf, J. Belisle, D. T. Golenbock, W. H. 303

Boom, and C. V. Harding. 2001. Toll-like receptor 2-dependent inhibition of 304

macrophage class II MHC expression and antigen processing by 19-kDa lipoprotein 305

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 15: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

15

of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol 167:910-8. 306

21. Pai, M., L. L. Flores, N. Pai, A. Hubbard, L. W. Riley, and J. M. Colford, Jr. 307

2003. Diagnostic accuracy of nucleic acid amplification tests for tuberculous 308

meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 3:633-43. 309

22. Pai, R. K., M. E. Pennini, A. A. Tobian, D. H. Canaday, W. H. Boom, and C. V. 310

Harding. 2004. Prolonged toll-like receptor signaling by Mycobacterium 311

tuberculosis and its 19-kilodalton lipoprotein inhibits gamma interferon-induced 312

regulation of selected genes in macrophages. Infect Immun 72:6603-14. 313

23. Pal, R., S. Marwaha, I. Pepponi, J. F. Mann, M. J. Paul, and R. Reljic. 2010. 314

Generation of self-renewing immature dendritic cells from mouse spleen that can take 315

up mycobacteria and present antigens to T cells. APMIS 118:729-38. 316

24. Pal, R. B., and M. M. Desai. 2007. Polymerase chain reaction for the rapid diagnosis 317

of tuberculous meningitis. J Indian Med Assoc 105:21-2, 24. 318

25. Petrofsky, M., and L. E. Bermudez. 1999. Neutrophils from Mycobacterium 319

avium-infected mice produce TNF-alpha, IL-12, and IL-1 beta and have a putative 320

role in early host response. Clin Immunol 91:354-8. 321

26. Radhakrishnan, V. V., S. Sehgal, and A. Mathai. 1990. Correlation between culture 322

of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and detection of mycobacterial antigens in 323

cerebrospinal fluid of patients with tuberculous meningitis. J Med Microbiol 324

33:223-6. 325

27. Ratnam, S., and S. B. March. 1986. Effect of relative centrifugal force and 326

centrifugation time on sedimentation of mycobacteria in clinical specimens. J Clin 327

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 16: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

16

Microbiol 23:582-5. 328

28. Shenai, S., J. Minion, V. Vadwai, T. Tipnis, S. Shetty, A. Salvi, Z. Udwadia, M. 329

Pai, and C. Rodrigues. 2011. Evaluation of light emitting diode-based fluorescence 330

microscopy for the detection of mycobacteria in a tuberculosis-endemic region. Int J 331

Tuberc Lung Dis 15:483-8. 332

29. Tan, B. H., C. Meinken, M. Bastian, H. Bruns, A. Legaspi, M. T. Ochoa, S. R. 333

Krutzik, B. R. Bloom, T. Ganz, R. L. Modlin, and S. Stenger. 2006. Macrophages 334

acquire neutrophil granules for antimicrobial activity against intracellular pathogens. 335

J Immunol 177:1864-71. 336

30. Thwaites, G. E., and T. H. Tran. 2005. Tuberculous meningitis: many questions, too 337

few answers. Lancet Neurol 4:160-70. 338

31. Trusov, A., R. Bumgarner, R. Valijev, R. Chestnova, S. Talevski, C. Vragoterova, 339

and E. S. Neeley. 2009. Comparison of Lumin LED fluorescent attachment, 340

fluorescent microscopy and Ziehl-Neelsen for AFB diagnosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 341

13:836-41. 342

32. Ulrichs, T., M. Lefmann, M. Reich, L. Morawietz, A. Roth, V. Brinkmann, G. A. 343

Kosmiadi, P. Seiler, P. Aichele, H. Hahn, V. Krenn, U. B. Gobel, and S. H. 344

Kaufmann. 2005. Modified immunohistological staining allows detection of 345

Ziehl-Neelsen-negative Mycobacterium tuberculosis organisms and their precise 346

localization in human tissue. J Pathol 205:633-40. 347

33. Yeager, H., Jr., J. Lacy, L. R. Smith, and C. A. LeMaistre. 1967. Quantitative 348

studies of mycobacterial populations in sputum and saliva. Am Rev Respir Dis 349

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 17: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

17

95:998-1004. 350

351

352

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 18: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

18

Figure legends 353

Fig. 1. Comparison of the conventional and modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain for CSF 354

samples from tuberculous meningitis patients. (A, B) The conventional stain shows 355

damaged cellular structure (A) and cell aggregations (B). No intracellular acid fast 356

bacilli (AFB) are observed with the conventional method. (C-F) The modified method 357

can concentrate AFB in the CSF (C). Intracellular AFB are frequently observed in 358

neutrophils (D), monocytes (E) and lymphocytes (F). Arrows show acid fast 359

dye-positive AFB. Insets indicate higher magnification views of arrow-indicated AFB 360

or cells. Scale bars: 20μm (A-F), 5μm (Insets). 361

362

Fig. 2. Intracellular distribution of acid fast bacilli (AFB) in neutrophils and 363

monocytes on the modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain. Double-labeling of auramine-O (AO) 364

(A, E, green) with CD11b (B, red) and ED1 (F, red) shows the intracellular location of 365

AFB in neutrophils (A-D) and monocytes (E-H). AO, CD11b and ED1 label AFB, 366

neutrophils and monocytes, respectively. The nuclei are stained by Hoechst 33342 367

(blue). Panels (D’, D’’) and (H’, H’’) show higher magnification views of panel (D) 368

and (H) in Z-axis projections, respectively. Scale bars: 20 μm (A-H), 5 μm (D’, D’’, 369

H’, H’’). 370

371

Fig. 3. Intracellular distribution of acid fast bacilli (AFB) in lymphocytes on the 372

modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain. Double-labelling of auramine-O (AO) (A, D, green) 373

with CD3 (B, red) and CD20 (E, red) shows the intracellular location of AFB in 374

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 19: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

19

lymphocytes (C, F). The nuclei are stained by Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bar: 5 μm. 375

376

Fig. 4. Comparison of acid fast bacilli (AFB)-positive fields by the conventional and 377

modified Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) stain. Totally, 300 fields on each slide from 48 CSF 378

specimens were observed. Compared with the ZN stain, which reveals no intracellular 379

AFB-positive fields, the modified ZN stain definitely identifies AFB within the 380

immune cells. Moreover, the modified stain reveals more extracellular AFB-positive 381

fields than the conventional ZN stain. 382

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 20: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 21: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 22: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 23: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 24: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

Table 1. Sensitivity of all techniques analyzed by sample (n = 48)*, patient (n = 29).

Specificity of all techniques in all cases was 100%.

Technique [% sensitivity (No. positive samples)]

Group Culture ZN stain Modified ZN stain

Analysis by patient (n = 29) 100 % (29) 27.6 % (8) 100 % (29)

Analysis by sample (n = 48) 72.9 % (35) 16.7 % (8) 100 % (48)

* 48 CSF samples were collected from 29 TBM patients. ZN, Ziehl-Neelsen.

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 25: Downloaded from //jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/early/2012/01/06/JCM...2012/01/06  · 130 modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain was identical (100 %, 29/29) while that of the 131 Ziehl-Neelsen stain

Table 2. Positive rate of intracellular and extracellular ABF in the CSF samples (n =

48) detected by Ziehl-Neelsen stain and modified Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) stain,

respectively.

Technique [% positive rate (No. positive samples)]

Group ZN stain Modified ZN stain

Extracellular ABF (n = 48) 16.7 % (8) 100 % (48)

Intracellular ABF (n = 48) 0 % (0) 93.8 % (45)

on May 2, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from