Upload
ougueway
View
226
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
1/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 1MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Finite Element Analysis forMechanical and Aerospace Design
Prof. Nicholas ZabarasMaterials Process Design and Control Laboratory
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
101 Rhodes Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-3801
http://mpdc.mae.cornell.edu/
mailto:[email protected]://mpdc.mae.cornell.edu/http://mpdc.mae.cornell.edu/mailto:[email protected]7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
2/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 2MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
A refresher on beam bending
Beams are different from truss structuresin that they are designed to resisttransverse loads.
The tranverse loads are transported tothe supports of the beam viaextensional action.
There are several beam models
depending on the assumptionsemployed. We herein consider theBernoulli-Euler beam theoryusuallyintroduced in introductory staticscourses.
We assume thatnormals to the middle line of
the beam remain straight and normal.
This will allow us to approximate thedisplacements at a given point.,x yu u
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
3/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 3MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Bernoulli-Euler beam theory
The x-component of the displacementthrough the depth of the beam is given as:
xu
sin ( ) ( : 0 0)x x
u y x Note y u= < >
where (x) is the rotation of the middle line(positive counterclockwise) at x and y isthe distance from the middle line.
We assume that
For (x) small, sin =,
( )ydu x
dx =
y
x
duu y
dx=
Thus we conclude:
2
2
yxx
d uduy y
dx dx = = =
y
curvature
y( , ) ( ).y yu x y u x=
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
4/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 4MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Displacements im Bernoulli-Euler Beam model
In summary, the following displacements are considered:
( )( , )( , ) ( )
( )
yx
y yy
du xu x y yy
dxu x y u x
u x
= =
( )ydu xdx
=,y
y u
( , ) ( , 0)y y
u x y u x=
,x
x u
'( , )x yP x u y u+ +
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
5/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 5MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Stress and moment calculation
From Hookes law, we can compute theaxial stress as:
2
2
y
x
d uy
dx
=
2
2
y
x x
d uE Ey
dx = =
With integration, we can now computethe bending moment as follows:
2 2 2
2
2 2 2( ) y y y
x
A A A
d u d u d uM x ydA Ey ydA E y dA EIdx dx dx
= = = = Here I denotes the moment of inertia of
the cross section:
2
A
I y dA=
: 0,
0
xNote For
M
>
2
2.y
d uM EI M
dx =
2
2 .y
d u
M EI Mdx =
0M >
.V
2
2
2
2
,
,
,
.
yy u
y
y
M
y
V
u u on
duon
dx
d uMn EI n M on
dxd ud
Vn EI n V ondx dx
=
=
=
=
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
11/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 11MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Boundary conditions for beams
Free end with an applied load:
Simple support:
Clamped support:
,
.
M
V
Mn M on
Vn V on
=
=
0 ,
0 .
y u
M
u on
M on
=
=
0 ,
0 .
y uu on
on
=
=
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
12/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 12MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Potential energy of a beam element: Pe=Ue-We
Using these, let us compute the potential energy of a beamelement of length Le (to be defined shortly in more detail).
Strain energy:
External work:
2 22 2( )
2 2 2e ee e
e
e e ee x
L A
I
E E y EU dV dAdx y dA dx
= = =
2
2 2
2( )
2 2
y
e e
ee e e ee
d uE I E IU dx dx
dx
= =
Notes:
For this strain energy to make sense as anintegral, we need to introduce an approximation(interpolation) for such that issquare integrable (C1 continuity)
From now-on, we simply denote with thex-dimensional domain of a beam element e oflength Le (to be defined later in more detail)
e
yu 2 2/e
yd u dx
2
2( ) ,
yd u
M x EI
dx
=2
2,
yd udM d
V EI
dx dx dx
= =
22
2 2
yd udV dq EI
dx dx dx
= =
( ) ( ) ( ) | ( ) |e eMV
e
e e e
y y y
e
W q x u x dx Vu x M x
= + +
e
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
13/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 13MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
C1 continuity
Displacement that is C1
continuous: Both andare continuous.
yu
yu
yu ydu
dx=
yu
yuy
du
dx =
Displacement that is C0continuous: iscontinuous but
is discontinuous.y
u
http://../FiniteElementClass/CarlosFelippa/Introduction%20to%20Finite%20Element%20Methods%20(ASEN%205007)%20Course%20Material.mhthttp://../FiniteElementClass/CarlosFelippa/Introduction%20to%20Finite%20Element%20Methods%20(ASEN%205007)%20Course%20Material.mhthttp://../FiniteElementClass/CarlosFelippa/Introduction%20to%20Finite%20Element%20Methods%20(ASEN%205007)%20Course%20Material.mhthttp://../FiniteElementClass/CarlosFelippa/Introduction%20to%20Finite%20Element%20Methods%20(ASEN%205007)%20Course%20Material.mhthttp://../FiniteElementClass/CarlosFelippa/Introduction%20to%20Finite%20Element%20Methods%20(ASEN%205007)%20Course%20Material.mhthttp://../FiniteElementClass/CarlosFelippa/Introduction%20to%20Finite%20Element%20Methods%20(ASEN%205007)%20Course%20Material.mhthttp://../FiniteElementClass/CarlosFelippa/Introduction%20to%20Finite%20Element%20Methods%20(ASEN%205007)%20Course%20Material.mhthttp://../FiniteElementClass/CarlosFelippa/Introduction%20to%20Finite%20Element%20Methods%20(ASEN%205007)%20Course%20Material.mhthttp://../FiniteElementClass/CarlosFelippa/Introduction%20to%20Finite%20Element%20Methods%20(ASEN%205007)%20Course%20Material.mht7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
14/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 14MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Two-noded beam element
We need interpolation forboth displacements and
slopes at the ends of thebeam (C1 continuity)
Our element degrees offreedomare taken as the
following:
1
1
2
2
{ }
y
e
y
u
d u
=
1
1
2
2
{ }
y
e
y
F
M
f F
M
=
The corresponding
conjugate nodal forcesare:
Note that:( ),
1, 2
I IM M X
I
=
el
2yu1y
u
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
15/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 15MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Two-noded beam element: Sign conventions
Please note the convention forpositive nodal
displacements and slopesat both ends (posit ive y-axis- upwards andcounterclockwise,respectively)
As a result, the notation for the conjugate nodal forces is asfollows:
1 2,y yF F are positive when they point in the positive y-axis
1 2,y yM M are positive when they are anticlockwise
1V2
V2
M1
M
1x x= 2x x=2
1 2yu1y
u
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
16/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 16MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Interpolation functions for 2-noded beam element
We interpolate thedeflection along the beam
using the followingHermite interpolationfunctions for beamelements.
21
21
22
22
1(1 ) (2 )
4
(1 ) (1 )
81
(1 ) (2 )4
(1 ) ( 1)8
u
e
u
e
N
LN
N
LN
= +
= +
= +
= +
12( )
1, 1 1
e e
e
x x
L
=
1
1
1 1 2 2
2
2
( ) [ ]
y
e
y u u
y
u
u x N N N N u
=
( ) [ ] { }
e e e
yrow vector column vector
u x N d =
1e
x x= 2e
x x=
1(1 ) , 1 12
eeL
x x = + +
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
17/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 17MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
How the interpolation functions are computed?
We are looking for anapproximation of the form:
We compute byinterpolation using thevalues of deflection andslope at the ends of theelement:
1x x= 2x x=
0
12 3 2 3
0 1 2 3
2
3
( ) 1y
aa
u x a a a aa
a
= + + + =
1
2
1 1 1 0 1 2 3
1 1 1 1 2 3
1 2 2 0 1 2 3
1 2 2 1 2 3
1: | ,
1: | | , 2 32 2 2
1: | ,
1: | | , 2 32 2 2
y y y
e e e
y yx x
y y y
e e ey y
x x
u u u a a a a
du du L L L a a ad dx
u u u a a a a
du du L L La a a
d dx
=
= =
=
= =
= = = +
= = = = +
= = = + + + = = = = + +
1= 1= +
12( ) 1, 1 1e
e
x x
L
=
0 1
1 1
2 2
3 2
1 / 2 / 8 1 / 2 / 83 / 4 / 8 3 / 4 / 8
0 / 8 0 / 8
1 / 4 / 8 1 / 4 / 8
e e
y
e e
e ey
e e
a uL La L L
a uL L
a L L
=
in :
2
ey y y
du du dudx LCha rule
d dx d dx
= =
1(1 ) , 1 12
eeL
x x = + +
2
1 2 3
( )2 3
ydu xa a a
d
= + +
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
18/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 18MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
How the interpolation functions are computed?
With substitution, weobtain:
This can finally besimplified as:
1x x= 2x x=
0
12 3 2 3
0 1 2 3
2
3
( ) 1y
a
a
u x a a a a a
a
= + + + =
1= 1= +
12( ) 1, 1 1e
e
x x
L
=
0 1
1 1
2 2
3 2
1 / 2 / 8 1 / 2 / 8
3 / 4 / 8 3 / 4 / 8
0 / 8 0 / 8
1 / 4 / 8 1 / 4 / 8
e ey
e e
e ey
e e
a uL L
a L L
a uL L
a L L
=
1
12 3
2
2
1/ 2 / 8 1/ 2 / 8
3 / 4 / 8 3 / 4 / 8( ) 1
0 / 8 0 / 8
1/ 4 / 8 1/ 4 / 8
e ey
e e
y e ey
e e
uL L
L Lu x
uL L
L L
=
1 21 2
1
13 2 3 3 2 3
2
2
1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1( )
2 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 2 4 4 4 4u u
y
e e
y
y
N NN N
u
L Lu x
u
= + + + + +
1(1 ) , 1 12
eeL
x x = + +
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
19/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 19MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Interpolation functions for 2-noded beam element
Use change rule to findderivatives with respect to
x, e.g.
12( ) 1, 1 1e
e
x x
L
=
1 1u udN dN d
dx d dx
=
21 3 (1 )4
udN
d
=
2eddx L
=
21
2
1
22
22
1(1 ) (2 )
4
(1 ) (1 )8
1(1 ) (2 )
4
(1 ) ( 1)8
u
e
u
e
N
L
N
N
LN
= +
= +
= +
= +
1x x= 2x x=
1(1 ) , 1 12
eeL
x x = + +
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
20/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 20MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Continuity of displacements
Note that at =-1 (left node), . Similarly at
the right node.
1
11 1 2 2
2
2
( ) [ ]
y
ey u u
y
u
u x N N N N u
=
1 1 2 2( 1) 1, ( 1) ( 1) ( 1) 0u uN N N N = = = = = = = =
1( )e
y yu left node u=
1 =
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
21/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 21MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Continuity of slopes
Note that at =-1 (left node), . Similarly at
the right node.
1
11 1 2 2
2
2
( )( ) [ ]
y
e
y u u
y
u
du x dN dN dN dN x
udx dx dx dx dx
=
1 1 2 2( 1) 1, ( 1) ( 1) ( 1) 0u udN dN dN dN
dx dx dx dx
= = = = = = = =
1( )e
left node =
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
22/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 22MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Curvature calculation
12( ) 1, 1 1e
e
x x
L
=
1 1 2 2( ) [ ]{ }ye eu u
du dN dN dN dN x d
dx dx dx dx dx
= =
2 2 2 2 21 1 2 2
2 2 2 2 2[ ]{ }
ey eu ud u d N d N d N d N d
dx dx dx dx dx
= =
2
2 2 2 2 21 1 2 2
2 2 2 2 2
4[ ]{ }
e
y eu u
e
d u d N d N d N d N d
dx d d d d L
=
2
2
1 6 6[ 3 1 3 1]{ }
e
e
y e
e e e
B
d u
ddx L L L
= +
2
2[ ]{ }
e
y e ed u
B ddx
=
2
2
e
yd u
dx
=
We will need to alsocompute the curvature
to compute the strainenergy. Starting from:
21
21
22
22
1(1 ) (2 )4
(1 ) (1 )8
1(1 ) (2 )
4
(1 ) ( 1)8
u
e
u
e
N
LN
N
LN
= +
= +
= +
= +
1(1 ) , 1 12
eeLx x = + +
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
23/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 23MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Strain energy calculation
Recall that:
Thus with our Hermite interpolation, we can write:
Recall that (from global to local degrees offreedom), so the assembly of the strain energy term will
give:
2
2
2( )
2e
ee eye
d uE IU dx
dx
=
1{ } [ ] [ ] { }
2 e
e e T e T e e e e e
Beam element stiffness
U d B E I B dx d
=
{ } [ ]{ }e ed L d=
1
1
1 { } ([ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]){ }2 2
eT e T e T e e e e
e
Jacobian
dx
LU d L B E I B d L d
=
2
2[ ]{ }
e
y e ed u
B ddx
=
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
24/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 24MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Element stiffness
For constant on the element, the
stiffness is given as (use directintegration):
e eE I
[ ]
e
K
22 2
3 3
2 2
2 2
1 2 2
2 21
2 2
12 6 12 636 6 (3 1) 36 6 (3 1)
6 4 66 (3 1) (3 1) 6 (3 1) (9 1)
36 6 (3 1) 36 6 (3 1)2
6 (3 1) (9 1) 6 (3 1) (3 1)
e ee e
e ee e e ee e e ee
e ee e
e e e
L LL L
L LL L L LE I E IK d
L LL L
L L L L
+
= =
+ + + +
2
2 2
2
12 6 12 6
6 2 6 4
e e
e e
e e e e
L L
L L
L L L L
1
1 2
Te
e e e e e LK B E I B d
=
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
25/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 25MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
The external
work is: Upon assembly all terms with V and M cancel at each nodeunless external force and/or moments are applied there.
We can thus write:
The boundary is non-zero only if the element e has at oneof its ends a prescribed shear force .
Similarly, the boundary is non-zero only if the element e
has at one of its ends a prescribed moment . Note that the sign notation for and is consistent with the
sign convention for , respectively.
External work calculation
( ) ( ) ( ) | ( ) |e eMVe
e e e
y y yeW q x u x dx Vu x M x
= + + e
V
e
M
1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )e
e e e e e e e e e e e e e
y y y y y
e
W q x u x dx V u x V u x M x M u x
= + + + +
V M
V
M
1 2 1 2, ,e e e e
V V and M M
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
26/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 26MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Recall that:
For example, if we only account for prescribedmoments and shear force at both ends, the
above equation is written explicitly as:
External work calculation
( ) ( ) ( ) | ( ) |e eMV
e
e e e
y y y
e
W q x u x dx Vu x M x
= + +
2 12 12 1 2 1( ) ( )e
e
y
e
W q x u x dx V u V u M M
= + + + +
1V2V
2M1M
1x x= 2x x=2
1 2yu1y
u
E l k l l i
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
27/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 27MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace DesignN. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
We will keep the general notation here as it will alsoallow us to account for shear force and moments
applied even inside the element!
We will consider these cases in our followingderivations but please note that if you apply amoment or shear force at a point, you will be betterserved to make that point a finite element node!!
External work calculation
( ) ( ) ( ) | ( ) |e eMV
e
e e e
y y y
e
W q x u x dx Vu x M x
= + +
1V2V
2M1M
1x x= 2x x=2
1 2yu1y
u
M
V
E t l k l l ti
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
28/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 28MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Recall that:
We assume known distributed load, applied concentratedload and applied concentrated moments. Applying theHermite interpolation:
Note that in this expression, only the elements e that haveboundaries (i.e. one of their end points) on the boundaries
contribute to the last two terms.
External work calculation
( ) ( ) ( ) | ( ) |e eMV
e
e e e
y y y
e
W q x u x dx Vu x M x
= + +
[ ]
{ } ( )[ ] [ ] | |e eMVe
e Te e T e T e T d N
W d q x N dx N V M dx
= + +
,V M
E t l k l l ti
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
29/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 29MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Also note that with our notation, and are row vectorsand is a column vector. Assembling (transform fromlocal to global degrees of freedom) then gives:
External work calculation
[ ]eN [ ]e
B
{ }ed
[ ]{ } [ ] ( )[ ] [ ] | |
[ ]
{ } [ ] ( )[ ] [ ] | |
e eV M
e
e eV M
e
e T
T e T e T e T
e
e TT e T e T e T
e columnvector column
vector
d NW d L q x N dx N V M dx
d N
d L q x N dx N V M dx
= + +
+ +
[ ]{ } ( )[ ] [ ] | |e e
MVe
e Te e T e T e T d N
W d q x N dx N V M dx
= + +
Mi i i ti f t t l t ti l
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
30/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 30MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
This minimization problem results in:
Minimization of total potential energy
{ }{ }
1min min { } ([ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]){ }
2[ ]
{ } [ ] ( )[ ] [ ] | |
e
e
e eV M
e
T e T e T e e e e e
dde
e TT e T e T e T
e
d L B E I B dx L d
d Nd L q x N dx N V M
dx
=
+ +
[ ] { }
[ ]([ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]){ } [ ] ( )[ ] [ ] | |e e
V Me e
e Te T e T e e e e e e T e T e T
e e
Global stiffness K Global force vector F
d NL B E I B dx L d L q x N dx N V M
dx
= + +
Fi l fi it l t ti
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
31/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 31MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Note that the above minimization process is with respect tothe nodal displacements (i.e. excluding the DOF withprescribed displacement or rotation).
As was done in earlier lectures, by splitting the stiffnessmatrix, we finally obtain:
Final finite element equations
[ ]([ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]){ } [ ] ( )[ ] [ ] | |e e
V Me e
e Te T e T e e e e e e T e T e T
e e
d NL B E I B dx L d L q x N dx N V M
dx
= + +
{ }Fd
[ ]{ } [ ] { }T EF F F F EF K d f f K d = +
Distributedloads
BoundaryLoads (forces,moments)
U if di t ib t d l d
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
32/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 32MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
For uniform over the element load q the first term gives:
Uniform distributed load
1
612
6
e
e
e
e
L
qLf
L
=
( )[ ]e
e e Tf q x N dx
=
1
11
21int
2 tan
( )[ ] ( )
2e
u
ee e T
performuegration
forcons t q
N
NLf q x N dx q x d
NN
= =
2
eqL
2
eqL2
12
eqL2
12
eqL
1 2
C t t d l d i id th l t
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
33/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 33MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Assume a contentrated load at . We write this load asa distributed load using a delta function (nice trick!):
Substitution into the first term of the formula for gives:
Concentrated load inside the element
( )[ ]e
e e Tf q x N dx
=
e
L
1F1x x=
1x x=
1 1( ) ( )q x F x x=
1 1( )[ ]e
e e Tf F x x N dx
=
ef
1 1[ ( )]e e Tf F N x =
If the applied load is at a
node e.g. , then:2e
x1
00
1
0
ef F
=
E l bl
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
34/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 34MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Example problem
The beam ABC is clamped at the left side
and simply supported at the right side.Dimensions are in m, forces in N andloading q in N/m . Also, EI = 104 Nm2. Atx
=12m, and . Find thedeflection, shear forces and moments.20V Nt
= 20 .M N m
=
20M = 20V =
Fi it l t di ti ti
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
35/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 35MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Finite element discretization
We consider 2 beam elements as follows:
1 2
1,2 3,4 5,6Degrees
of freedom
20M = 20V =
Stiffness of element 1
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
36/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 36MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Stiffness of element 1
2 2
3
3
2 2
12 6 12 6 0.23 0.94 0.23 0.94
6 4 6 2 0.94 5.00 0.94 2.5010
12 6 12 6 0.23 0.94 0.23 0.94
0.94 2.50 0.94 5.006 2 6 4
e
L L
L L L LEIK
L LL
L L L L
= =
4
10 , 8EI L= =
1 2 3 41
2
3
4
Stiffness of element 2
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
37/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 37MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Stiffness of element 2
2 2
3
3
2 2
12 6 12 6 1.88 3.75 1.88 3.75
6 4 6 2 3.75 10.00 3.75 5.0010
12 6 12 6 1.88 3.75 1.88 3.75
3.75 5.00 3.75 10.006 2 6 4
e
L L
L L L LEIK
L LL
L L L L
= =
3 4 5 63
4
5
6
410 , 4EI L= =
Global stiffness
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
38/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 38MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Global stiffness
3
0.23 0.94 0.23 0.94 0 0
0.94 5.00 0.94 2.50 0 0
0.23 0.94 2.11 2.81 1.88 3.75
10 0.94 2.50 2.81 15.00 3.75 5.00
0 0 1.88 3.75 1.88 3.75
0 0 3.75 5.00 3.75 10.00
K
=
1 2 3 4 5 61
2
3
4
5
6
Boundary moments and forces
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
39/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 39MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Boundary moments and forces
Element 1 has no boundary with applied V or M.
Element 2 has and at its right end.
Assembly of this vector gives:
[ ][ ] | |e e
V M
e Te e T d N
f N V M
dx
= +
20V Nt= 20 .M N m=
410 , 4EI L= =
2
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 0 20
0 1 20
f V MN
N
= + =
3
4
5
6
0
0
0
0
20
20
f
N
N
=
1
2
3
4
5
6
Distributed load and concentrated load inside the element
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
40/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 40MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Distributed load and concentrated load inside the element
Element 1 has distributed load q=-1 andconcentrated load P1=-10Nt.
11 0
1 1
[ ( )] |
1 1 1928
1 15.3( 1)86 6( 0) ( 10)1 1 1 92 2
28 15.316 6
T
T
A
N P
L
qL
f N P
L
=
= + = = + =
1 2
1
2
3
4
410 , 8EI L= =
( ) 1q x = 20M = 20V =
21
21
22
22
1(1 ) (2 )
4
(1 ) (1 )8
1(1 ) (2 )
4
(1 ) ( 1)8
u
e
u
e
N
LN
N
LN
= +
= +
= +
= + 0=
Distributed load
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
41/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 41MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Distributed load
Element 2 has concentrated load P2 at an end point
2 22
5
0( 1)
00
T
f N P
= = =
1 2
3
4
56
410 , 8EI L= = 2 2
2 1[ ( )] |T
f N P ==
20M = 20V =
1=
Assembled load
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
42/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 42MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Assembled load
Assembling all load contributions gives:
1 2
1 2
0 9 0 9
0 15.3 0 15.3
0 9 5 4
0 15.3 0 15.3
20 0 0 20
20 0 0 20
Boundary From element From elementconditions
f
N
N
= + + =
1
2
3
4
5
6
20M = 20V =
Solution step
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
43/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 43MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Solution step
1
1
23
2
3
3
0 90.23 0.94 0.23 0.94 0 000.94 5.00 0.94 2.50 0 0
0.23 0.94 2.11 2.81 1.88 3.7510
0.94 2.50 2.81 15.00 3.75 5.00
0 0 1.88 3.75 1.88 3.75
0 0 3.75 5.00 3.75 10.00
y
y
y
y
y
y
u
u
u
= =
=
1
115.3
4
15.3
20
20
uR
R
+ +
1 2
1,2 3,4 5,6
Note that we applied the essential boundary conditions and included thecorresponding reaction force and moment at this location
20M = 20V =
Solution step
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
44/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 44MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Solution step
2
23
3
3
2.11 2.81 1.88 3.75 4
2.81 15.00 3.75 5.00 15.310
1.88 3.75 1.88 3.75 20
3.75 5.00 3.75 10.00 20
y
y
y
y
u
u
=
1 2
1,2 3,4 5,6
2
2
3
3
0.55
0.11
1.03
0.12
y
y
y
y
u
u
=
2
2 13
3 1
3
90.23 0.94 0 010
0.94 2.50 0 0 15.3
y
y u
y
y
uR
u R
+
= +
1
1
33
252 .
uR N
R N m
=
20M = 20V =
Displacement field
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
45/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 45MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Displacement field
For element 1:
For element 2:
1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
2
2
00
( ) [ ]y u u u y y
y
y
u x N N N N N u N u
= = +
2
22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3
1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 33
3
( ) [ ]
y
y
y u u u y y u y yy
y
u
u x N N N N N u N N u N u
= = + + +
Moments and shear forces
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
46/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 46MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Moments and shear forces
1
2 12 1 2 1 2 1 2 11 11 2 2
2 2 2 2 2[ ]{ } 236.67 23.76y u u
d Nd u d N d N d N M EI EI d x
dx dx dx dx dx
= = = +
1
3 13 1 3 1 3 1 3 11 11 2 2
2 3 3 3 3[ ]{ } 23.76y u u
d Nd u d N d N d N V EI EI d
dx dx dx dx dx= = =
1
2 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 21 2 2
2 2 2 2 2[ ]{ } 222 20.25y u u
d Nd u d N d N d N M EI EI d x
dx dx dx dx dx= = = +
1
3 23 2 3 2 3 2 3 22 21 2 2
2 3 3 3 3[ ]{ } 20.25y u u
d Nd u d N d N d N V EI EI d
dx dx dx dx dx
= = =
Place nodes on location of concentrated load
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
47/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 47MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Place nodes on location of concentrated load
To compute an accurate shear force, youneed to split element 1 in more elements.For sure place a node at the application of
load P1.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
x
displacement
Displacements: FE versus analytical beam solutions
FE
Exact S olution
0 2 4 6 8 10 12-300
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
x
moment
Moments: FE versus analytical beam solutions
FE
Exact Solution
0 2 4 6 8 10 12-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
x
shear
Shear: FE versus analytical beam solutions
FE
Exact Solution
Results with refined grids: 3 elements
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
48/49
CCOORRNNEELLLLU N I V E R S I T Y 48MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
N. Zabaras (9/13/2011)
Results with refined grids: 3 elements
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
x
displacement
Displacements: FE versus analytical beam solutions
FE
Exact Solution
0 2 4 6 8 10 12-300
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
x
moment
Moments: FE versus analytical beam solutions
FE
Exact Solution
0 2 4 6 8 10 12-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
x
shear
Shear: FE versus analytical beam solutions
FE
Exact Solution
Results with refined grids: 101 elements
7/30/2019 DirectMethod Beams
49/49
MAE 4700 FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
Results with refined grids: 101 elements
0 2 4 6 8 10 12-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
x
displacement
Displacements: FE versus analytical beam solutions
FE
Exact Solution
0 2 4 6 8 10 12-300
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
x
moment
Moments: FE versus analytical beam solutions
FE
Exact Solution
0 2 4 6 8 10 12-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
x
shear
Shear: FE versus analytical beam solutions
FE
Exact Solution