34
Differens options in thoracoscopic sympathectomy Hans Pilegaard, Ass. Prof, MD Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Denmark 13th Turkish Thoracic Society Congress Istanbul Turkey

Differens options in thoracoscopic sympathectomy

  • Upload
    shiela

  • View
    49

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Differens options in thoracoscopic sympathectomy. Hans Pilegaard, Ass. Prof, MD Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Denmark 13th Turkish Thoracic Society Congress Istanbul Turkey. Hyperhidrosis. National questionnaire 150.000 households - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Differens options in thoracoscopic

sympathectomy

Hans Pilegaard, Ass. Prof, MD

Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryAarhus University Hospital, Skejby

Denmark

13th Turkish Thoracic Society CongressIstanbul Turkey

Page 2: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Hyperhidrosis

Strutton et al. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51:241-248

National questionnaire 150.000 householdsUS prevalence 2.8%

7.8 millions individuals

4 millions axillarwork

emotionalpsychologicalsocial

Page 3: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Hyperhidrosis

• Blushing• Facial• Palmar• Axillary• Foot

• Raynaud syndrome• Cardiac arrhytmia?• Angina pectoris?

Thoracoscopic treatment

Page 4: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Topical

Aluminium chloride (AlCl3-6H2O)

Anticholinergic agentsAstringent agents (Glutaraldehyde, formalin)IontophoresisBotulinum toxin

Excision of glands in the axillary regionLiposuctionLaser treatment

Page 5: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Thoracotomy Kotzareff 1920 Kotzareff A. Rev Med Suisse Romande 1920; 40:111-

113

Supraclavicular approach Telford 1935Telford E. Br J Surg 1935; 23:448-450

Anterior approach Polumbo 1956Polumbo LT. Arch Surg 1956;72:659-66

Transaxillary Goets & Marr 1944Goets R, Marr J. Clinical Proceedings 1944; 3:102-114

Posterior Adson 1929Cloward 1969Cloward. J Neurosurgery 1969; 30:545-551

Axillar extrapleural Roos 1971Roos D. Ann Surg 1971; 173:429-442

Open sympathectomy

Page 6: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Thoracoscopy Hughes 1942Hughes J. Proc Royal Soc Med 1942; 35:585-586

Thoracoscopy Goets & Marr 1944Goets R, Marr J. Clinical Proceedings 1944; 3:102-

114

Thoracoscopy Kux 1946-54Kux E. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1954

VATS 1980´s -

Thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Page 7: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Thoracoscopic sympathectomy

EasyFast (minuttes)Good visualizationSmall incisions

OutpatientAwakeLocal anaestesia

Elia et al. Awake one stage bilateral thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: A safe outpatient procedure. 2nd EACTS/ESTS joint meeting, Leipzig, Germany 2004

Page 8: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Definitions

• Sympathotomy– Transection

• Sympathectomy– Resection– Ablation

Page 9: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Thoracoscopy

• Needle, 5mm, 10mm

• Uniportal• 2 ports• 3 ports can be necessary

Page 10: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Methods

• Electrocoagulation• Harmonic scalpel• Laser• Clipping

– Reversal

Page 11: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Electric vs harmonic scalpel

• Non randomized prospective• N=1515 patients• 24 hours, 7 days and 30 days• Responserate: 90%/68%/27%• No difference either by method or

level

de Campos JR et al. ICVTS: in press JR

Page 12: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Clipping

• N=727 patients – responsrate 92%• T2: 399, T2+3: 55, T3+4: 273• 34 patients have had clip removed• T2: 21, T2+3: 7, T3+4: 6 • 15 patients. decrease in

compensatory sweating

Sugimura H et al. J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137(6): 1370-8

Page 13: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Supine Single lumen tube

Harmonic scalpelTwo ports

Method

Reverse Trendelenburg

Page 14: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Blushing Th 2

Palmar Th 2-3 Axillary Th 2-3-4

Sympathectomy level

Page 15: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy
Page 16: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy
Page 17: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Sympathicotomy - left

Page 18: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Facial blushing and hyperhidrosis

T1-T2-T3 Drott et al. Br j Dermatol 1998;138:639-43.

T2 Kim et al. Eur J Cardiothor Surg 2004;26:396-400

Doolabh et al. Ann Thor Surg 2004;77:410-4Dewey et al. Ann Thor Surg 2006;81:1227-33Chou et al. Surg Endoscpo 2006;20:1749-53Licht et al. Ann Thor Surg 2006;81:1863-6Weksler et al. Thorac Surg Clin 2008;18:183-191

T2-T3 Drott et al. J Cosmet Dermatol 2000;1:115-9

Licht et al. Ann Thor Surg 2006;81:1863-6

Page 19: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Facial blushing and hyperhidrosis

• Follow-up questionaire – 2 centers• N=189 • Responsrate 96%• Outcome similar• Compensatory sweating• T2 83% - T2-3 95% p=0.02

Licht et al. Ann Thor Surg 2006;81:1863-6

Page 20: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Facial blushing

• RCT• T2 vs T2-T3• Study size n=200• N= 55• No difference

Page 21: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

+200 papers

Most recommend T2-T3

Palmar hyperhidrosis

Chiou TS & Chen SC. Br J Surg 1999; 86:45-47Reisfeld R et al. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002; 12:255-267Kao MC. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72:667-668Andrews & Rennie JA. Br J Surg 1997; 84:1702-1704Lin CC. Surg Endosc 1990; 4:224-226

T2

Dumont P et al. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 78:1801-1807 Zacherl J et al. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68:1177-1181 Gossot D et al. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75:1075-1079

Yilmaz EN et al. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996; 10:168-172Lardinois D & Ris HB. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21:67-70Nicholson ML et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1994; 76:311-314

T2-T4

T2-T5

Page 22: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

T2 vs T3Palmar hyperhidrosis

• N= 60 patients• Succesrate: 59/60• Compensatory hyperhidrosis

– No differens in number, but in severity

– T2/T3: 13/4 p= 0.007

Yazbek G et al: Clinics 2009;64(8):743-9Yazbe

Page 23: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

T3 vs T2-T4Palmar hyperhidrosis

• N= 232 patients

Compensatorysweating

T2-4N=115

T3N=117

p

N= 33 25

Mild 15 12

Moderate 7 9

Severe 11 4 < 0.05

Xu Li et al. Ann Thor Surg 2008;85:1747-52

Page 24: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Axillary hyperhidrosis

T2-T4 Zacherl J al. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68:1177-1181Hsu CP et al. Arch Surg 2001; 136:1115-1117Dumont P et al. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 78:1801-1807 Rex LO et al. Eur J Surg Suppl 1998;23-26 Drott C & Claes G. Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 4:788-790 Ahn SS et al. Ann Vasc Surg 2000; 14:415-420

T2-T3 Fox AD et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999; 17:343-346Andrews BT & Rennie JA. Br J Surg 1997; 84:1702-1704Kao MC et al. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1996; 25:673-678

T2 Chiou TS & Chen SC. Br J Surg 1999; 86:45-47

Page 25: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

T4 vs T3-4Axillary hyperhidrosis

• N= 64 patients• RCT

Compensatory sweating

T3-4 T3 p T3-4 T3 P

Mild 16 14 18 13

Moderate

11 2 < 0.001

11 1 < 0.001

6 mdr 12 mdr

Munia MAS et al. Clinics 2008;63(6);771-4

Page 26: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Compensatory sweating

• N=158 patients• Responsrate 89%

– T2 facial blushing and hyperhidrosis– T2-3 palmar hyperhidrosis– T2-4 axillary hyperhidrosis

Level of sympathectomy

Severe sweating %

T2 21

T2-3 36

T2-4 49

Licht et al. Ann Thor Surg 2004;78:427-31

P=0.04

Page 27: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Gustatory sweating

• N=238 patients• Responsrate 96%• Gustatory sweating 32%

Level of sympathectomy

Gustatory sweating %

T2 27

T2-3 29

T2-4 44

Licht et al. Ann Thor Surg 2006;81:1043-7

P=0.04

Page 28: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Information to the patient

• Succes rate• Sideeffects

– Compensatory sweating– Gustatoric sweating– Horner’s syndrome– Heart rate

• Definitiv operation• Telarenta T. Eur J Surg Suppl 1998;580:17-8

Page 29: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Succesrate

• Facial blushing and hyperhidrosis 90%

• Palmar hyperhidrosis100%

• Axillary hyperhidrosis 80%

Page 30: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Sideeffects

• Compensatory sweating 90%• Gustatoric sweating 35%• Horner’s syndrome > 1%• Heart rate at rest 10%

• Dry hands

• Return to basic not a possibility

Page 31: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Side effect - Harlequin

Eur J Cardiothor Surg 2010;37:959

• 1997-2007• N=669• 48 reoperation

Number

Improved

Unilateral 29 96%

Bilateral 6 50%

recurrence 13 75%80% compensatory sweating38% worsening

Licht et al. Ann thor Surg 2010;89:1087-90

Page 32: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Conclusion

T2 for facial blushing and hyperhidrosis

T3 for palmar hyperhidrosis

T4 for axillary hyperhidrosis

Page 33: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Conclusion

Most patients are satisfied with the operation

90% of the patients will get compensatory sweating

Signifikant compensatory sweatingis more frequent after

T2-4 sympathectomi for axillary hyperhidrosis

Page 34: Differens options in  thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Good information before the operationis mandatory

Conclusion