Upload
lainey
View
23
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Diabetes Symposium Primary prevention of diabetic nephropathy: pharmacological intervention Piero Ruggenenti Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research Unit of Nefrology and Dialysis, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti , Bergamo,Italy Malaga, October 10 2005. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Diabetes Symposium
Primary prevention of diabetic nephropathy:
pharmacological intervention
Piero Ruggenenti
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological ResearchUnit of Nefrology and Dialysis,
Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo,Italy
Malaga, October 10 2005
DEVELOPINGCOUNTRIES
DEVELOPEDCOUNTRIES
0500
100015002000250030003500400045005000
1990 2020Yusuf et al. Circulation 2001
Deaths (x 1000)
Cardiovascular diseases are the fastest growing cause of death in developing countries and by the year 2020 they would take the lead
PROJECTED CHANGES OF ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE MORTALITY WORLDWIDE(1990 to 2020)
3
- Diabetes
- High Blood Pressure
- Chronic Renal Disease
4
World
20002030
154 m370 m
55 m84 m
Developed Developing
99 m286 m
16.733.8
32.9
18.2
52.430.7
28.3
9.1
80.9
22.8
42.3
18.6
0.9 1.6
2000
2030
* In million subjects
102%
81%
71%
211%
255%
127%
78%
THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DIABETES (2000-2030)
WHO, March 2003
5
INCREASING DEATHS DUE TO DIABETES
U.S. National Center for Health Statistics, 1999
140
120
100
80
60
Ag
e-ad
just
ed d
eath
rat
e re
lati
ve t
o 1
980
1980 1984 1988 1992 1996
Diabetes
Cancer
Cardiovascular diseaseStroke
6
HALF-CENTURY’S EXPERIENCE IN DIABETES MELLITUS
Joslin EP, B Med J, 1950
30
90
(%)
60
Diabetic comaCardiovascular complications
1910-20 1920-30 1930-400
1940-50
7
PROTEINURIA IS AN INDEPENDENT RISK FACTOR FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
Nelson et al., Diabetes, 1988
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Healthysubjects
Non proteinuricdiabetics
Proteinuricdiabetics
Ag
e- a
nd
sex
-ad
just
ed d
eath
s(x
10
00
pe
rso
n-y
ea
r)
Age adjusted cardiovascular mortality in PIMA indians
Juomilehto et al., Diabetologia, 1998
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
12 24
Years of diabetes
CH
D(%
)
Cumulative incidence of CHD in type 1 diabetes
22201816140
With proteinuria
Without proteinuria
8
40 % of type 1 and of type 2 diabetics are at risk of overt nephropathy
THE FACT
9
PROGRESSION OF RENAL FAILURE IN 9 DIABETICS
Modified from Jones et al., Lancet, 1979
0
20
40
60
80
0 10 20 30 40 50
Time (months)
1/C
r x
10 3
(µm
ol/l)
10 Riser et al., Am J Pathol, 1996
Mechanical stress
Podocyte proliferation
Podocyte number
GLOMERULAR HYPERTENSION
Scarring
Durvasula et al, Kidney Int, 2004
Control0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
Pg
of
An
g I
I p
er
µg
of
cell
lysa
te
1.0*
Stress
Pore dimension
11
GLOMERULAR PERMEABILITY TO MACROMOLECULES
Protein traffic
Glomerular hypertension
0.10
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
Po
re r
ad
ii d
istr
ibu
tion
0 20 30 40 50 60
Pore radius (Å)
10
Diabetic
Control
P GC
63mmHg
53mmHg
12A. Remuzzi et al., J Am Soc Nephrol, 1993
0.010
0.100
1.000
20 30 40 50
0.500
0.200
0.050
0.020
0.005
Fic
oll
Fra
ctio
nal
Cle
aran
ce
Vehicle
Angiotensin II
Effective Molecular Radius (A)°
Lapinski et al., J Am Soc Nephrol, 1996
Fra
ctio
nal d
extr
an c
lear
ance
1
Controls
Diabetes
0.1
0.01
0.001
24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60
Effective Molecular Radius (A)
13
14
Renal injury
Glomerular-capillary hypertension
Increased filtration of plasma proteins
Excessive tubular reabsorption
Nuclear signals for NF-kB-dependent and independent vasoactive and inflammatory genes. Corresponding protein products then released
into interstitium
Tubular cell transdifferentiation
Fibroblast proliferation
Fibrogenesis
Increased glomerular permeability to macromolecules
Proteinuria
Renal scarring
Reduction of nephron numbers
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF PROGRESSIVE NEPHROPATHIES
Remuzzi and Bertani, N Engl J Med, 1998
15Remuzzi et al., J Am Soc Nephrol, 1993
Angiotensin II receptor blocker by limiting urinary protein traffic - through a reduction in dimension of large unselective pores - also reduced tubulointerstitial and glomerulosclerosis injury
400
200
100
300
0
Urin
ary
prot
ein
excr
e tio
n (m
g/24
h)
0 4 8 12
Dia
bet
es
Dia
bet
es +
Lo
sart
an
months
**
*
P GC
63mmHg
53mmHg
16
SBP (mmHg)DBP (mmHg)GFR (ml/min/1.73sqm)RPF (ml/min/1.73sqm)FF (%) Urinary protein excretion (g/24h)Albumin fractional clearance (x10-5)IgG fractional clearance (x10-5)
* p < 0.05 Basal vs.Enalapril; ** p < 0.01 Basal vs. Enalapril
CLINICAL AND KIDNEY FUNCTIONAL PARAMETERSBasal Enalapril
152 ± 19 83 ± 9 23 ± 11
366 ± 164 7.0 ± 3.5 3.0 ± 1.9
455 ± 394 138 ± 156
149 ± 1481 ± 6
24 ± 12 357 ± 212 7.2 ± 3.0 2.2 ± 1.3
248 ± 355 * 78 ± 131 **
EnalaprilDiabetes30
35
40
45
50
55
60 u (Å)
0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
EnalaprilDiabetes
mean size of membrane poresfiltrate volume fraction that would pass through the shunts if plasma protein were absent
u
o
Remuzzi A et al., J Nephrol, 1993
o x 10 -3
Control Control
17
Decrease in Mean Blood
Pressure (mm Hg)
- 2 –
0 –
- 2 –
- 4 –
- 6 –
- 8 –
- 40 –
- 20 –
0 –
- 20 –
- 40 –
- 60 –
% Reduction in
Proteinuria
P <.001
% with Doubling of
Baseline Creatinine
Baseline creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl
0
25
50
75
100
0 1 2 3 4
Captopril
Conventional therapy
Lewis et al. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1456-1462.
NS
ACE-I IS BETTER THAN CONVENTIONAL THERAPY IN TYPE 1 DIABETES
18
Decrease in Mean Blood
Pressure (mm Hg)
+ 2 –
0 –
- 2 –
- 4 –
- 6 –
- 8 –
- 9 –
- 10 –
+ 40 –
+ 20 –
0 –
- 20 –
- 40 –
- 60 –
% Reduction in
Proteinuria
p <.001
% with Doubling of
Baseline Creatinine+ ESRD+ death
0
25
50
75
100
0 1 2 3 4
Losartan
Conventional therapy
Brenner et al, N Engl J Med., 2001.
NS
RENAAL: ARB IS BETTER THAN CONVENTIONAL
THERAPY IN TYPE 2 DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY
+ 19
- 45-9.2 -9.6
19
In diabetic renal disease a major achievement has been already to limit progression from macroalbuminuria to the need of dialysis
1 -
20
Heart Failure
MI
Stroke
CV Death
RENAAL Secondary Composite Endpoint and Components
Losartan n=751
n
89
50
47
90
Placebo n=762
n
127
68
50
79
% RiskLosartan vs placebo
- 32
- 28
- 5
+12
21
HAZARD RATIO OF RENAL AND CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS ACCORDING TO 6 MONTHS REDUCTION IN PROTEIN/CREATININE RATIO
ESRD
CV events
Heart failure
0.4 0.60.2 0.8 1 1.2
RENAAL Study group, 2002
Hazard ratio (95 % C.I.)
Decreased risk Increased risk
22
HAZARD RATIO FOR CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS ACCORDING TO TREATMENT AND RESIDUAL (6 MONTHS) PROTEINURIA
RENAAL study group, 2002
Haz
ard
ratio
rel
ativ
e to
lo
wes
t pro
tein
uria
Protein/creatinine ratio at 6 months (g/g)
CV Endpoint
1
1.01
1.02
1.03
1.04
1.05
<0.4 2.0 3.0 4.1 ≥ 5.2
Losartan
Placebo
23
AT1 blockade
Angiotensin II
AT2 overstimulation
- BP reduction- vasodilation- antigrowth and antitrophic effects
- cardiovascular fibrosis
- Inhibition of coronary angiogenesis
Any disruption of angiogenesis that may arise from stimulation of AT2 receptors in the context of AT1 blockade could have serious implications in ischemic tissues such as a diseased myocardium or in lower limbs affected with peripheral arterial disease
Silvestre et al., Circ Res, 2002
Akishita et al., Circulation, 2000
24
A META-ANALYSIS OF 47 TRIALS OF 8,305 PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY RANDOMIZED TO ACEi OR ARB THERAPY vs PLACEBO
ACEi
Patients
4,805
ARB 3,329
All cause mortality Relative Risk (95% C.I.)
Strippoli et al., J Am Soc Nephrol, 2003
0.7 0.80.6 0.9 1 1.1
Decreased risk Increased risk
1.2 1.3
25
ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKADE VS ACE-I IN TYPE 2 DIABETES AND NEPHROPHATYA 5-years, randomized trial
Enalapril(n = 130)
GFR (ml/min/1.73 sqm)
CV events (%)(fatal//non fatal)
Barnett et al., N Engl J Med, 2004
Telmisartan(n = 120)
-14.9
21
-17.9
27
However: - more progression and events on telmisartan
- statistics ?
“These findings support the clinical equivalence of AII-RA and ACE-I in persons with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy”
26
ANNUAL MORTALITY AND ESRD IN SUBJECTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES AND NEPHROPATHY
Adler et al., Kidney Int, 2003
0
20
25
15
(%)
10
5
ESRD
*
Estimate from the ° UKPDS and the *RENAAL studies
Mortality
°
?U
KP
DS
RE
NA
AL
27
RISK OF CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS ACCORDING TO RENAL OR CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
Renal insufficiency and albuminuria
Coronary artery disease
R.R. (95 % C.I.)
1 1.25 1.5 2.0 2.50.5Increased risk
28
00
*
*300
200
0 31-33 35-37 39-41
EVIDENCE THAT ACE-I HAS A DIFFERENT EFFECT ON GLOMERULAR INJURY ACCORDING TO THE DIFFERENT PHASE OF THE DISEASE AT WHICH THE TREATMENT IS STARTED
Pro
tein
uri
a (m
g/2
4h)
Pro
tein
uri
a (m
g/2
4h)
Perico et al., J Am Soc Nephrol, 1994
Time (weeks) Time (weeks)
0 20-24 24-28 28-32
Diabetes
Diabetes + ACEi
ACEi
ACEiDiabetes
Diabetes + ACEi100
200
200
160
120
80
40
29
RENAALIDNT
IRMA 2
ESRDNormoalbuminuria Micro Macro
0 25
Duration of diabetes (years)
< 20 20 - 200 > 200UAE µg/min
13 18
30
EFFECT OF ANGIOTENSIN II ANTAGONISM ON PROGRESSION TO MACROALBUMINURIA IN SUBJECTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES AND MICROALBUMINURIA
Parving et al., N Engl J Med, 2001
Inci
den
ce o
f m
acro
alb
um
inu
ria
(%)
Months of follow-up
0 3 6 12 18 22 240
5
10
15
20
Placebo
Irbesartan
31
The second important step was to reduce the number of patients who progress from microalbuminuria to overt nephropathy
2 -
32
THE ASSOCIATION OF MICROALBUMINURIA AND MORTALITY IN TYPE 2 DIABETES
An overview of 2.138 patients of 8 clinical trials from 1992 to 1995
R.R. (95 % C.I.)
1 4 160.5
Micro worse
64 256
33
Preventing nephropathy is more important than retarding progression
34
RENAALIDNT
IRMA 2BENEDICT
ESRDNormoalbuminuria Micro Macro
0 25
Duration of diabetes (years)
< 20 20 - 200 > 200UAE µg/min
13 18
35
1.200 hanno preso parte allo studio
The BENEDICT trial
6.500 pazienti studiati
36
To assess whether microalbuminuria can be prevented in people with type 2 diabetes and normal urinary albumin excretion
PRIMARY AIM
37
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Arterial hypertension
Normoalbuminuria
Serum creatinine
WHO criteriaAge ≥ 40 yrsDuration < 25 yearsHbA1c < 11 %
Systolic BP > 130 mmHg and/or
Diastolic BP > 85 mmHg and/or
need for antihypertensive agents
UAE < 20 µg/min (in at least 2 of 3 consecutive overnight urine collections)
< 1.5 mg/dl
Inclusion criteria
The BENEDICT group, CCT 2003Ruggenenti et al., N Engl J Med, 2004
38Ravid et al., Ann Intern Med 1998
EFFECTS OF ENALAPRIL (10 mg/day) IN NON-OBESE SUBJECTS WITHTYPE 2 DIABETES, NORMAL BLOOD PRESSURE ANDNORMOALBUMINURIA
110
105
100
95
900 1 2 3 4 5 6
Me
an
Blo
od
Pre
ss
ure
(m
mH
g)
Years
40
30
20
10
0
UA
E
(mg
/24
h)
Enalapril (n=77)
Placebo (n=79)
*
*
* p < 0.05 vs. enalapril
39
Cha
nge
vs. b
asal
(%
)
Bakris et al., Kidney Int 2004
EFFECTS OF CALCIUM ANTAGONIST SUBCLASSES ON MARKERS OF NEPHROPATHY PROGRESSIONA systematic review of randomized trials of dCCBs and ndCCBs in hypertensive adults with proteinuria
MAP
-30
-20
-10
0
dCCBs ndCCBs
Proteinuria
-30
-20
-10
0
dCCBs ndCCBs
10
0
10
p < 0.01
40
THE EFFECT OF 6 MONTH TREATMENT WITH TRANDOLAPRIL AND ITS FIXED-DOSE COMBINATION WITH VERAPAMIL ON PROTEINURIA IN 60 NORMOTENSIVE ADULTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES
Trandolapril VeraTran Trandolapril VeraTran
pre
Pro
tein
uria
(g/
24 h
ours
)
post0
0.5
1.0
1.5
pre post
p < 0.01 p < 0.001
pre
GF
R (
ml/m
in)
post0
60
80
100
pre post
p < 0.05
40
20
Rubio-Guerra et al., Diabetes Care, 2004
41
Study design
Overnight UAE
Blood pressure and routine laboratory tests
RAS inhibitors withdrawal
Ran
do
mis
atio
n
0 6 12 18 24 30 36months
RUN-IN TREATMENT PERIOD
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0weeks
ndCCBs withdrawal
Trandolapril (2mg/d)
Verapamil S.R. (240 mg/d)
Trandolapril (2mg/d) plus Verapamil S.R. (180 mg/d)
Placebo
42
0
5
10
15
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48
Follow-up (months)
Placebo(30 events)
Trandolapril
plus
verapamil(17 events)
300
300
249
229
232
214
217
203
210
187
201
176
192
164
162
136
115
89
Cu
mu
lati
ve I
nci
de
nce
of
Mic
roal
bu
min
uri
a (%
)
No. at Risk
Trandolapril plus VerapamilPlacebo
A.F. (95 % C.I.) = 0.39 (0.19 - 0.80) p = 0.01
43
0
5
10
15
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48
Cu
mu
lati
ve
inci
den
ce o
f m
icro
alb
um
inu
ria
(%)
Follow-up (months)
301
300
254
229
237
214
224
203
207
187
198
176
188
164
149
136
104
89
No. at Risk
Trandolapril
Placebo
Placebo(30 events)
Trandolapril (18 events)
A.F. (95 % C.I.) = 0.47 (0.26 - 0.83) p = 0.01
44
Cu
mu
lati
ve
inci
den
ce o
f m
icro
alb
um
inu
ria
(%)
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48
Follow-up (months)
303
300
234
229
210
214
202
203
189
187
181
176
174
164
134
136
98
89
No. at Risk
Verapamil
Placebo
0
5
10
15
Placebo
(30 events)
Verapamil
(36 events)
45
ADVERSE EVENTS
Fatal
Cardiovascular
Non Fatal
Cardiovascular
Trandolapril VerapamilTrandolapril
plusverapamil
Placebo
41
8012
21
6713
20
6711
53
7012
N=301 N=303 N=300 N=300
46 Palmer et al., Diabetes Care, 2004
COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF RAS INHIBITION IN TYPE 2 DIABETES MODELED OVER 25 YEARS
0
20
25
15
10
5
Cu
mu
lati
ve in
cid
ence
(%
)
ESRD
0
30
15
10
U.S
. $
(x
1,00
0)
Per patient costs
20
25
5
No
rmo
B
EN
ED
ICT
?M
acro
Mac
ro
RAS-inhibition
Mic
ro
Placebo
?
Mac
ro
Mac
ro
RAS-inhibition
Mic
ro
Placebo
IRM
A-2
RE
NA
AL
IRM
A-2
RE
NA
AL
No
rmo
B
EN
ED
ICT
47
Broome
Bega, Kalgoorlie
Borroloola
Wadeye
Naiuyu
Tiwi Islands
Chronic Disease Outreach Program in Australia
Soweto, South Africa
Chennai, India
48 Hoy et al., J Am Soc Nephrol, 2003
A cost effectiveness analysis estimate savings of $ 800,000 AUS to $ 4,1 million at 2 years in cost of dialysis avoided or delayed
0
5
10
Eve
nts
per
10
0 p
erso
ns/y
ea
rs15
20Conventional Perindopril
ES
RD
De
ath
1990 1995 2000
49
Nicaragua
Moldova
Cuba
Nigeria
Bolivia
ChinaNepal
Philippines
Maroco
Armenia
Established programs
Programs in development
Indonesia
India
Paraguay
AustraliaSouth Africa
50
A new agenda for kidney doctors will be for the future preventing nephropathy with the final aim to limit cardiovascular events and death
3 -
51
Just kidney doctors ?