Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CIVIL ENGINEERING
European Real Estate Society 22nd Annual Conference, 24th-27th June 2015, Istanbul, Turkey
Dipl.-Ing. Sebastian Johann
Prof. Dr. Björn-Martin Kurzrock
Unit of Real Estate Studies
Development of refurbishment concepts – The case of multi-family houses from the 1970s in Western Germany
CIVIL ENGINEERING
2
• European housing stock dominated by properties built before 1980s
• often high backlogged maintenance • far behind current technical and social requirements
• Multi-family houses from the 1970s in Germany as relevant typology
• about 2.4 million dwellings • often without any major refurbishment measures • high priority for refurbishments in future
• Refurbishments create technical, functional, energetic and aesthetic improvements
Picture source: IWU 2012.
Motivation
CIVIL ENGINEERING
3
• Introduction of two-level process for developing supply and demand-oriented refurbishment concepts for residential buildings
• Case of multi-family houses from 1970s in Western Germany
• Identifying prioritised refurbishment measures in roof area
Picture source: Colourbox.
Purpose of the paper
CIVIL ENGINEERING
4 Source: Own representation.
Data
Typical characteristics of multi-family houses
from the 1970s and user requirements
Data of housing associations
Expert interviews no=13
Building typologies no=13
Usage based Energy passes
(Techem) no=13.711
Data of IWU no=229
Generally accepted engineering
standards from construction time
Research about life time of building
components
GdW living matrix model
CIVIL ENGINEERING
5 Sources: Own representation based on IWU 2012, p. 35; Wohnbau Lörrach 2013; GdW 2008, p. 66.
Process for developing refurbishment concepts
Typology level Individual building level
Typology characteristics Building characteristics
Refurbishment concept
User requirements
Survey on site (existing and potential new residents)
Requirement profile
Refurbishment measures
Recommendations for action
User requirements
Targets of the owner
Application recommendations
for action
CIVIL ENGINEERING
6
• Typically constructed with flat roofs (warm and cold roofs)
• Typical lifetimes of flat roof components
• Needs for action: • Full replacement of flat roof construction in case of material obsolescence • Repair of minor damages
Sources: Own representation based on building lifetime literature.
Typology level: Step 1 Needs for action for the buildings
Steel-reinforced concrete
roof
Building component 1974 1984 1994
roof
Vapour barrier
Roof drain (stainless steel,
synthetic)
Waterproofing with
roofing film
50 y.
58 y.
2024 2034 204420142004
> 80 y.
Light dome
25 -Thermal insulation 50 y.
20 - 40 y.
25 -
30 -
20 - 48 y.
CIVIL ENGINEERING
7
Target-group (no.) Domestic (9) Domestic (10) Domestic (11) Domestic (12) Domestic (13)
Type of Household Singles, couples Singles, couples Singles, couples Singles, couples Families,
multiperson
Age (in years) < 30 < 30 30-44 45-64/from 65 all
Purchasing power low middle middle to high low to
high/middle low to high
Residential
quality
Normal
High – – –
Dwelling
Modern
doors/floors
Modern layout
Easily accessible
Technology Energy saving –
Energy Modern efficiency
Renewable – –
Legend Standard Added value No/little interest – No information Sources: Own representation based on GdW 2013, pp. 122-126.
Typology level: Step 2 Needs for action of the users
CIVIL ENGINEERING
8
• “Must-be“-requirements: damages and material obsolescences
• One-dimensional requirements: explicit described requirements of the users
• Attractive requirements: attributes with added-value for the users
Source: Own representation.
Typology level: Step 3 Prioritisation of needs for action by the Kano model
Requirement group Area Measure Condition
“Must-be”-requirements Roof
Fully replacement of roof construction
Damages in roof construction
Repair of roof Minor damages in roof construction and adequate thermal insulation
Requirement group Area Measure Target-group 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
One-dimensional requirements
Roof
Creation of contemporary thermal insulation – – – – – – –
Creation of modern layouts – – – – – – – –
Attractive requirements Roof – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
CIVIL ENGINEERING
9
Measure Unit Investment cost [€]
Min. Ø Max.
Replacement of light domes, size 0,5-1,0 m² piece 1,200 1,350 1,500
Repair of roof drainage (zinc) m² 12 13 15
Repair of sealing sheets m² 65 70 81
Add new 3-layer bitumen sheeting m² 70 77 90
Add new 3-layer bitumen sheeting with gravel m² 90 99 110
Add new 3-layer bitumen sheeting, 16-20 cm insulation, gravel m² 126 144 156
Add new synthetic roofing membrane, gravel m² 85 95 106
Add new synthetic roofing membrane, insulation, gravel m² 110 124 140
Add new EPS insulation m² 41 44 48
Addition of story m² tfa 1,600 - 2,100
Source: Schmitz et al. 2014, pp. 191-198. Costs for cost groups 200-500 including value-added tax.
Typology level: Step 4 Refurbishment measures and costs
CIVIL ENGINEERING
10 Source: Own representation. M = “must-be” recommendations; O = one-dimensional recommendations
Typology level: Step 5 Recommendations for action
No. Area Current situation Target Measure
Roof
1) Functional roof waterproofing with minor damages; existing thermal insulation 2) Functional roof waterproofing with minor damages and functionality; no existing thermal insulation
1) Repair damages 2) Repair damages, improve thermal insulation
1) Repair roof waterproofing 2) Repair roof waterproofing; insulate roof with 18 cm heat conductivity group 035 as unventilated roof
Roof 1) Roof waterproofing damaged 2) Damped roof construction
Repair damages, improve thermal insulation
Demolish existing roof waterproofing; insulate roof with 18 cm heat conductivity group 035 as unventilated roof
Roof Functional roof waterproofing; no existing thermal insulation
Improve thermal insulation
Insulate roof with 18 cm heat conductivity group 035 as unventilated roof on existing roof waterproofing
Roof Demand for modern layouts Create new living space with modern layouts
Addition of story in timber frame construction
M1
M2
O1
O2
CIVIL ENGINEERING
11 Sources: Own representation based on IWU 2012, p. 35; Wohnbau Lörrach 2013; GdW 2008, p. 66.
Individual level
Typology level Individual building level
Typology characteristics Building characteristics
Refurbishment concept
User requirements
Survey on site (existing and potential new residents)
Requirement profile
Refurbishment measures
Recommendations for action
User requirements
Targets of the owner
Application recommendations
for action
CIVIL ENGINEERING
12
• Relevance for property owners (e.g. housing corporations, municipalities, owner communities or foreign investors)
• Assess building characteristics, needs for action and calculate capital expenditures more efficiently
• Implement demand-oriented refurbishment measures more efficiently
• Improved transparency for building owners, which could help to enhance refurbishment rates
Picture source: school-technology-services.com
Practical implications
CIVIL ENGINEERING
13
• Process useful for developing refurbishment concepts for other relevant building typologies
• Interconnection of results for several buildings on typology level with level of districts
• Indications for the optimum timing of refurbishment measures
• Limitations • Recommendations for action derived and calculated from a broad building stock • Recommendations may vary for individual buildings
Picture source: cep-probation.org
Future research and limitations
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Thank you for your attention.
Do you have any questions or remarks?
Dipl.-Ing. Sebastian Johann
Tel.: +49 631/205-5670
Email: [email protected]
CIVIL ENGINEERING
16
Ideal-typical constructions of warm and cold roofs
Sources: Own representation based on building typology literature; Dierks and Wormuth 2012, p. 690.
CIVIL ENGINEERING
18
• Location
• Layout
• Quality
• Dwelling size
• Equipment rooms
• Equipment bath room
• Equipment kitchen
• Equipment logistics
• Equipment open space
• Equipment community
• Equipment technology/energy
• Equipment other
• Equipment building
• Price segment
Source: GdW 2013, p. 122.
The living matrix: Housing characteristics
CIVIL ENGINEERING
19
Limitations • Limited transparency (process, methodology, classification of people) • Heterogeneities in living concepts hidden • Persons in overlaying living concepts hidden • Eastern and Western Germans summarised • Major society and migrants summarised
Reasons for selection
• Widely used by housing associations and municipalities • Specific focus on housing • Connection of requirements and willingness-to-pay • Topicality • Free availability
The living matrix model: Limitations and reasons for selection