20
Testing of FENDL-3 for protons and Testing of FENDL-3 for protons and deuterons deuterons A.V.Ignatyuk A.V.Ignatyuk Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk, Russia Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk, Russia Data verification for light nuclei (А < 30) ; Data for the iron group nuclei (40 < A < 70) ; Data for the zirconium group (70 < A < 100); Data for heavy nuclei (A>150); Conclusions. 2d CRP Meeting on FENDL3, Vienna, 22-26 April

Data verification for light nuclei ( А < 30) ; Data for the iron group nuclei (40 < A < 70 ) ;

  • Upload
    frayne

  • View
    18

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Testing of FENDL-3 for protons and deuterons A.V.Ignatyuk Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk, Russia. Data verification for light nuclei ( А < 30) ; Data for the iron group nuclei (40 < A < 70 ) ; Data for the zirconium group (70 < A < 100) ; - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Testing of FENDL-3 for protons and deuteronsTesting of FENDL-3 for protons and deuterons

A.V.IgnatyukA.V.Ignatyuk

Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk, RussiaInstitute of Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk, Russia

Data verification for light nuclei (А < 30) ;Data for the iron group nuclei (40 < A < 70) ;Data for the zirconium group (70 < A < 100);Data for heavy nuclei (A>150);Conclusions.

2d CRP Meeting on FENDL3,Vienna, 22-26 April 2010

Page 2: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data on the Experimental data on the 1144N(p,N(p,))1111CC reaction cross reaction cross section and their fit by the section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross evaluation of the cross section is compared with section is compared with the fitted curve in the the fitted curve in the bottom part.bottom part.

Page 3: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data on the Experimental data on the 1155N(p,N(p,nn))1155OO reaction cross reaction cross section and their fit by the section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross evaluation of the cross section is compared with section is compared with the fitted curve in the the fitted curve in the bottom part.bottom part.

Page 4: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data on the Experimental data on the 1166OO(p,(p,))1133NN reaction cross reaction cross section and their fit by the section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross evaluation of the cross section is compared with section is compared with the fitted curve in the the fitted curve in the bottom part.bottom part.

Page 5: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data on the Experimental data on the 1414N(N(dd,,nn))1155OO reaction cross reaction cross section and their fit by the section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross evaluation of the cross section is compared with section is compared with the fitted curve in the the fitted curve in the bottom part.bottom part.

Page 6: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data on the Experimental data on the 2727AlAl(p,x)(p,x)22&2422&24NaNa reaction reaction cross section and their fit by cross section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross evaluation of the cross section is compared with section is compared with the fitted curve in the the fitted curve in the bottom part.bottom part.

Page 7: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data on the Experimental data on the 2727AlAl((dd,x),x)22&2422&24NaNa reaction reaction cross section and their fit by cross section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross evaluation of the cross section is compared with section is compared with the fitted curve in the the fitted curve in the bottom part.bottom part.

Page 8: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data on the Experimental data on the natnatFeFe((dd,x),x) 56 56CoCo reaction cross reaction cross section and their fit by the section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross evaluation of the cross section is compared with section is compared with the fitted curve in the the fitted curve in the bottom part.bottom part.

Page 9: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data on the Experimental data on the 6464Ni(p,n)Ni(p,n)6464Cu Cu and and 6464Ni(Ni(dd,,22n)n)6464Cu cross-Cu cross-sectionsectionss in comparison with in comparison with various calculations and the various calculations and the Pade-approximation of data Pade-approximation of data

Page 10: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data on the Experimental data on the natnatCuCu((pp,x),x) 62 62ZnZn reaction reaction cross section and their fit by cross section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross evaluation of the cross section is compared with section is compared with the fitted curve in the the fitted curve in the bottom part.bottom part.

Page 11: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data on the Experimental data on the natnatCuCu((pp,x),x) 63 63ZnZn reaction reaction cross section and their fit by cross section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross evaluation of the cross section is compared with section is compared with the fitted curve in the the fitted curve in the bottom part.bottom part.

Page 12: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data for the Experimental data for the 9393Nb(d,2n)Nb(d,2n)93m93mMo reaction cross-section in Mo reaction cross-section in comparison with various calculationscomparison with various calculations

Page 13: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data for the Experimental data for the 9393Nb(d,Nb(d,pxpxn)n)((994-x)4-x)mmNb Nb cross-sectioncross-sectionss in in comparison with various calculationscomparison with various calculations

Page 14: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data for the Experimental data for the 165165HoHo((pp,n),n)165165Er Er crosscross section in comparison section in comparison with various calculationswith various calculations

Page 15: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data for the Experimental data for the 186186WW((d,2nd,2n))186186Re Re crosscross section in comparison section in comparison with various calculationswith various calculations

Page 16: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data for the Experimental data for the 181181TaTa((d,2nd,2n))181181Ta Ta crosscross section in comparison section in comparison with various calculationswith various calculations

Page 17: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data for the Experimental data for the 181181TaTa((d,pd,p))182182Ta Ta crosscross section in comparison section in comparison with various calculationswith various calculations

Page 18: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data for the Experimental data for the 197197AuAu((d,pd,p))198g198gAu Au crosscross section in comparison section in comparison with various calculationswith various calculations

Page 19: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

Experimental data for the Experimental data for the 197197AuAu((d,pd,p))198g198gAu Au crosscross section in comparison section in comparison with various calculationswith various calculations

197Au(d,p)198gAu

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Deuteron energy (MeV)

Cro

ss s

ectio

n (m

b)

Nassiff 1966

Sandoval 1964

Jahn 1973

Long 1985

Wenrong 1989

Tarkanyi 2010 40 MeV

Tarkanyi 2010 20 MeV

ALICE-D

EMPIRE-D

EAF-2007

TENDL-2009

Page 20: Data verification for light nuclei ( А  < 30) ; Data for  the iron group nuclei  (40 < A <  70 ) ;

ConclusionsConclusionsFor the proton-induced reactions a reasonable agreement between experimental data and the EAF-2007 evaluations was obtained in most cases. However, for some important materials the required accuracies of data should be estimated more accurately and compared with the available uncertainties of evaluations. For the deuteron-induced reactions the EAF-2007 evaluations essentially underestimate the (d,p) reaction cross sections near threshold energies. EAF-2007 overestimate also systematically the (d,2n) cross sections around their maximum values and underestimate the high-energy tails of the (d,xn) cross sections. For the high accuracy requests the improved evaluations would be recommended on the basis of the optimal data descriptions or more accurate estimations of the statistical model parameters.

2d CRP Meeting on FENDL3,Vienna, 22-26 April 2010