Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DURGAPUR
CW Pump efficiency improvement
through polymer coating
Author
Tapan Nandy
Sr. Manager
IPS 2013
DURGAPUR
NSPCL- An Overview
NSPCL is a joint venture company of SAIL and NTPC
formed in 04th June,2002.
DURGAPUR
Unit Dates:
Synchronization Commercial Operation
Full load achieved
I 17-Feb-1987 01-Jun-1987 03-Aug-1987
II 12-Mar-1988 04-May-1988 04-May-1988
MILESTONES of NSPCL, Durgapur
Boiler : 260 T/Hr x 2
TG : 60 MW x 2
DURGAPUR
66
9
67
7
77
0
90
3
91
1
91
0
93
6
94
9 10
06
10
16
10
40
.84
0
200
400
600
800
1000
12002
00
1-0
2
20
02
-03
20
03
-04
20
04
-05
20
05
-06
20
06
-07
20
07
-08
20
08
-09
20
09
-10
20
10
-11
20
11
-12
Year
GE
N
GEN
Highlights of NSPCL- DURGAPUR
DURGAPUR
AVF/ PLF TREND SINCE INCEPTION
79
.86
61
.92
66
.12 73
.56
86
.68
79
.73
59
.35
51
.59
57
.67
80
.4
78
.65
67
.78
79
.17
80
.05 9
0.0
6
90
.19
91
.11
93
.80
5
90
.67
4
95
.74
90
.04
95
.81
96
.65
2
94
.12
97
.01
56
.1
43
.59
46
.28
64
.16
61
.7
65
.15
48
.81
48
.5
47
.92 5
7.1
8 64
.14
64
.96
61
.79
63
.47
63
.66
64
.39 73
.02 8
5.9
33
86
.67
5
86
.61
88
.22
90
.28
95
.73
8
96
.62
98
.74
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
85-8
6
87-8
8
88-8
9
89-9
0
90-9
1
91-9
2
92-9
3
93-9
4
94-9
5
95-9
6
96-9
7
97-9
8
98-9
9
99-0
0
00-0
1
2001-0
2
2002-0
3
2003-0
4
2004-0
5
2005-0
6
2006-0
7
2007-0
8
2008-0
9
2009-1
0
2010-1
1
2011-1
2
Year
PL
F/ A
VF
AVF PLF GEN
DURGAPUR
14
.63
13
.6
13
.52
12
.34
1
12
.27
7
12
.3
12
.06
6
12
.51
1
12
.09
8
11
.78
3
11
.76
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
20
01
-02
20
02
-03
20
03
-04
20
04
-05
20
05
-06
20
06
-07
20
07
-08
20
08
-09
20
09
-10
20
10
-11
20
11
-12
FY
Auxiliary power consumption %
DURGAPUR
CW Pump efficiency improvement through polymer coating
ABSTRACT
As per EC act 2001, Power generating plant is a designated sector.
NSPCL Durgapur has 2x60 MW BTG. Our company NSPCL Durgapur is committed for
effective energy management. We are committed to save energy and reduce GHG emission.
In accordance to ENCON policy NSPCL Durgapur already has taken few initiatives to
optimize Aux power consumption.
The most important thrust area for energy conservation is efficient polymer coating on
CW/large water pump.
According to the U.S. DOE, pumps consume about 20% of all generated electricity. In a
typical surface water treatment and distribution system approx. 70-90% of energy is used for
pumping
Over an expected life span of 20 years, only 2.5 – 3% of the cost of pump operation is
related to procurement of new spares; 2 – 2.5% relates to maintenance costs rest 95% is
towards the cost of electricity to run the unit
DURGAPUR
CW Pump efficiency improvement through polymer coating
It is well understood that roughness of the interior surface affect the flow
characteristics. A rough surface introduces micro or even macro turbulent eddies
in the boundary layer causing an increase in velocity gradient. This velocity
gradient creates resistance in passage of flow . With the application of coatings
surface roughness is reduced by many-folds, thereby allowing the flow to be
comparatively less turbulent. Due to this phenomenon overall performance i.e.
head and flow characteristics increases. For example the surface roughness of a
cast iron substrate is Ra 18.8 microns, while the surface roughness of a flu glide
coating is as low as 0.4 to 0.08 microns. Due to lower coefficient of friction
between the fluid and coating and the hydrophobic nature of the coating, the
pump consumes less power. This directly contributes to enhance the efficiency of
the Pump.
1. ROUGHNESS AMPLITTUDE &
2. HYDROPHOBIC NATURE OF POLYMER COATING
DURGAPUR
CW Pump efficiency improvement through polymer coating
The below picture illustrates the surface roughness and flow path resistance
DURGAPUR
Effects of corrosion, Erosion-Corrosion
cavitations on the Performance of pumps
DURGAPUR
Effects of corrosion, Erosion-Corrosion
cavitations on the Performance of pumps
Value of C would depend upon the roughness only and for
any giving roughness C would be constant.
hf = (1.1758 V/CR 0.63 ) x L
The above equation is well accepted for fluid velocity
2-3 m/sec and temp within 50 deg c.
Material Hazen William Co-efficient
value
•Corroded cast Iron 60
•Corroded Steel 90
•Internally Coated steel 150
•Internally ceramic coated iron 140
DURGAPUR
CW Pump efficiency improvement through polymer coating
Details of CW pump at NSCPL Durgapur
Sl. No Item Reference Unit UNIT # I &II
COOLING WATER PUMPS
1. Pump Type Single stage, Vertical, mixed flow: 80 D 22 -
4H4 0 / 7
2. No. Pumps Installed Nos. 5
3. Normal Operation Nos. 3
4, Location of Pumps CW Pump House
5. Total Head MWC 28.00
6. Rated Capacity M3/ /hr 6000
PUMP MOTOR
1. Motor Type SBJVe — 148 r / 03
2. Motor Rating KW 800
3. Voltage KV 6.6
4 Speed RPM 740
5 FLA A 90.4
DURGAPUR
In NSPCL Durgapur normally 3 No’s CW pump is required at
full load . CW pump contributes 14 % of station APC. Thus
CW Pump was taken for efficiency improvement.
0
5
10
15
20
25
BFP CEP FD FAN MILLING SYS ID CW CHP AND OTHRS
BREAKUP OF APC
DURGAPUR
Seal and protect new equipment exposed to erosion and corrosion
Protect pump casings, impeller blades, gate valves, water boxes and fan
blades.
Rebuild heat exchangers, tube sheets and other circulation water equipment.
Use it as a topcoat on repaired surfaces to provide an exceptionally smooth
surface.
Increase efficiency of Pumps.
Advantages of polymer coating
DURGAPUR
Dismantling of pump impeller along with bowl, suction bell and column shaft at site.
Surface preparation: Surface cleaning and drying at workshop. Also
use of Fast Cleaner 2000 Spray /Cleaner
Blend 300 to degrease the surface.
Procedures of CW Pump polymer coating
DURGAPUR
Bowl was heavily pitted.
Bowl drying and cleaning at workshop and also use of Fast Cleaner 2000 Spray /Cleaner Blend 300 to degrease the surface. Bowl cone observed heavily damaged.
DURGAPUR
All impeller pictures clearly showing severe erosion
and pitting due to corrosion
DURGAPUR
Grit Blasting:
Blasting done as per SA 2.5 on pump bowl, bell and impeller surfaces. All surfaces made roughened ideally by
grit blasting (3-16 mesh/cm grit size).
Surface grinding:
Hand grinding with a coarse wheel or disc. This creates
increased surface area and "edges" to look into and essential for successful application
DURGAPUR
Adhesion:
Heating the repair area to 37°c - 40°c immediately before
applying brush able ceramic to dry off any moisture,
contamination or solvents and assists the ceramic system
in achieving maximum adhesion to the substrate.
Application of primer:
A suitable rust, wet, uv, high temperature, acid, alkali & oil
tolerant coating system - RL 500 PF applied on pump
bowl, bell and impeller as a primer to attain maximum adhesion.
DURGAPUR
Filling of dented surfaces : All minor dents on pump
bowl, bell and impeller repaired by applying CERAMIC
WEAR RESISTANT PUTTY
Coating and Curing : A top coat of SA 740 STANGARD -
Brush able Ceramic applied on pump bowl, bell and
impeller for protecting and repairing surfaces subject to
erosion, corrosion and wear.
Working time is 40 minutes at 21°C. After application ,
Brush able Ceramic will achieve a tack-free finish
approximately 2-3 hrs later. Functional cure is achieved in
about 24 hours at 21 Deg c. Cure may be accelerated by
using heat after the coating has been allowed to harden
under ambient conditions. Material will fully cure at 65°C in
4 hours. The maximum re-coat time between coats is 4-6
hours. Each coat should be 0.5-1.0 mm per coat. Two
coats ensure a pinhole free lining.
DURGAPUR
Dynamic balancing of impeller at work shop. Right side unbalance load is 9.66 gm and left side unbalance load is 10.22 gms against the tolerance of 27.65 gms for the both side.
Dynamic balancing of Impeller
DURGAPUR
After final coating suction bell, bowl and impeller arrived at site
DURGAPUR
CW PUMP FLOW MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES THROUGH GE PANAMETRICS PT878
Butter fly valve FLOW DIRECTION
DURGAPUR
FLOW
U/S
D/S
1. Flow measurement on single path method or Z method
2. U/S distance 4.78 m from bend 3. Spacing between sensors 389 mm
Schematic view of c.w pump along with distance measurements
DURGAPUR
Sl
no
Description Major activity
Cw-2
Major activity
Cw-1
Major activity
Cw-5
1 OH period 21.03.2011 to 20.04.2011 01.02.2012 to 10.03.2012 03.04.2012 to 23.04.2012
2 Special job Polymer coating Polymer coating No polymer coating
3 Major OH jobs New lower and upper
shaft fitted
Two no’s new seal ring
fitted
All rubber lining bush
replaced
All ss sleeves replaced.
New lower shaft fitted
New thrust pad fitted
Two no’s new seal ring
fitted
All rubber lining bush
replaced
New top and lower shaft
fitted
New diffuser fitted
Suction bell repaired
All seal ring replaced
4 Critical
measurement
Bottom seal ring gap
maintained 0.5 mm
same same
Cw pumps OH and polymer coating in last 3 years
DURGAPUR
CW -2
BEF
COATING
AFT
COATING
Item Ref Units
Measured
Value
Measured
Value
Pump Flow
(measured) M3/Hr 6250 6860
Density Kg/M3 1000 1000
Pump Flow TPH 6250 6860
Power KW 632 619
Pump Efficiency % 68.87 77.18
SEC KWH/Ton 0.101 0.090
Performance data : CW pump-2 polymer coating
PUMP EFFICIENCY
IMPROVED BY 8 %
SEC IMPROVED BY
10 %
DURGAPUR
CW-1 BEF COATING
AFT COATING
Item Ref Units Measured Value
Measured Value
Pump Flow (measured) M3/Hr 5413 6150
Density Kg/M3 1000 1000
Pump Flow TPH 5413 6150
Power KW 602 606
Pump Efficiency % 61.75 74.48
SEC KWH/Ton 0.111 0.098
PUMP EFFICIENCY
IMPROVED BY 12 %
SEC IMPROVED BY
17 %
Performance data : CW pump-1 polymer coating
DURGAPUR
CW-5 BEF OH AFT OH
Item Ref Units
Measured
Value
Measured
Value
Pump Flow
(measured) M3/Hr 5999 5868
Density Kg/M3 1000 1000
Pump Flow TPH 5999 5868
Power KW 611.2 618
Pump Efficiency % 69.84 67.56
SEC
KWH/To
n 0.102 0.105
After OH of pump no 5 no
significant improvement in
efficiency was observed
Performance data : CW pump-5 without polymer coating
DURGAPUR
The above data indicating there is no major unbalance effect on pump after Polymer coating
CW Pump Before coating
PDE
H/V/A in mm/sec
After coating
PDE
H/V/A in mm/sec
CW 2 1.1/0.9/1.2 0.7/0.6/0.7
CW 1 1.2/0.9/1.0 0.7/0.8/0.5
Vibration reading of CW pumps
DURGAPUR CW pump-1&2 flow pattern since coating
As per data , post
coating Sp energy
consumption of the
both CW pump is
still lower than pre
coating value.
20.02.11 CW_1 CW_2 pre coat REMARKS
Flow - 6250
Power - 632
SEC - 0.101
20.04.11 CW_1 CW_2 post coat
Flow - 6860
Power - 619
SEC - 0.09
20.11.11 CW_1 pre coat CW_2 post coat 8 nos CT outlet v/v open
Flow 5413 6265
Power 602 598
SEC 0.111 0.095
22.05.12 CW_1 post coat CW_2 post coat
9 nos CT outlet v/v open
Flow 6150 6275
Power 606 596
SEC 0.098 0.095
04.12.12 CW_1 post coat CW_2 post coat
7 nos CT
outlet v/v open
Flow 5966 5917
Power 598 606
SEC 0.100 0.102
Post coat Avg SEC 0.099 0.095
DURGAPUR
Condenser water box DP at different combinations of CW
pump running
CW PUMP COMBINATIONS CONDENSER DP REMARKS
CW-3,4,5 0.52 COATING NOT DONE
CW -1,4,5 0.63 CW 1 COATED
CW-2,4,5 0.64 CW 2 COATED
THE ABOVE DP OBSERVED ATWHEN ALL CT FAN’S OUTLET V/V IN OPEN
CONDITION
The above data indicates clearly that condenser water
box inlet pr increased when 3 nos cw running along with
coated pump 1 0r 2.
DURGAPUR
CONDENSER DATA
CONDENSER PERFORMENCE DATA
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Apr-1
0
Jun-
10
Aug-1
0
Oct
-10
Dec-1
0
Feb-11
Apr-1
1
Jun-
11
Aug-1
1
Oct
-11
Dec-1
1
Feb-12
Apr-1
2
Jun-
12
Aug-1
2
Oct
-12
YEAR
VA
CU
UM
U1 VAC U2 VAC CW O/L TEMP
In the FY 10-11 before Coating Condenser back pressure was very poor at
around 135 mm bar at Tcw inlet as 33 Deg Cent. Cond. outlet temp even
reached 50 deg Cent , Fourth CW pump had to be put into service to
reduce Condenser back pressure as well as outlet temp After Coating at
full load CW outlet temp is maintained maximum at 43 deg c when Tcw inlet
is 33 deg c.
DURGAPUR
Tangible gains
Cw pump-2.
Energy savings up to 12-13 :301 MWhr which is equivalent to
10.53 lacs
Pay Back period 10.63 months for continuous running.
Cw pump -1
Energy savings 345 MWhr which is equivalent to 12.21 lacs
Pay back period 6.64 months for continuous running.
Station Aux Power reduction by 0.089 %
Station Heat Rate improvement by 20 kcal/Kwhr which
contributes a significant savings of 120 lacs per annum (ie 1
kcal cost 0.07 paisa)
DURGAPUR
THANK YOU
For the attention
Monetary implications for cw pump polymer coating
C.W. -2 :
Coating cost 5.49 lacs
O/H cost 1.5 lacs
Post coating avg sec 0.095 kwhr/ton
Sec improvement = 0.101-0.095=0.006 kwhr/ton
Energy savings /day= 0.006*6000*24 kwhr
Energy savings 11-12 = 0.006*6000*24*200=0.172 mu
Energy savings 12-13 =0.006*6000*24*150=0.129 mu
Direct savings =0.172+0.129=0.301 mu *3.54=10.53 lacs( unit cost rs 3.54/-)
Payback period =7*10^5/0.006*6000*24*2.54 =10.63 months( for continuous run days)
CW-1 :
Coating cost 3.69 lacs
O/H cost 1.5 lacs
Avg sec 0.100 kwhr/ton
Sec improvement = 0.111-0.099=0.012 kwhr/ton
Energy savings /day= 0.012*6000*24 kwhr
Energy savings 12-13 = 0.012*6000*24*200=0.345 mu
Direct savings =0.345 mu *3.54=12.21 lacs( unit cost rs 3.54/-)
Payback period =8.75*10^5/0.012*6000*24*2.54 =6.64 months( for continuous run days)
APC
TOTAL SEC =0.006+0.012 KWHR/TON
ENERGY SAVINGS /DAY=(0.006+0.012)*6000*24=2.6 MWH
APC REDUCTION =0.089 %
Heat rate improvement:
Both the unit Avg vacuum reduced by 10 mm bar for each unit. This is
equivalent to 20 kcal/kwhr heat rate improvement for station.
Per day energy savings=2.88*20*10^6 kcal
Monetary savings/Annum= 2.88*20*10^6*0.07/100*300 (One kcal cost 0.07
paisa)=120 lakhs per annum.
CONCLUSION
Thermal power plants contribute 70% of India’s power generation installed capacity. It is not
possible to meet the growing demand due to long gestation period of power plant. Only solution
is to reduce auxiliary power consumption by energy conservation & energy efficiency practices.
There is tremendous scope in power sector for reducing auxiliary power consumption (APC)
Purpose of EC Act 2001 is same. In India, It is estimated that; reduction in APC by 1%,
equivalent of generation of 5000 Mu of energy per annum. Saved energy can be sold out. to
minimize the gap between supply & demand. EC act 2001 enable to do energy audit & analysis
& help us to identify number of energy conservation options. To implement EC Act-2001,
everybody made responsible for energy productivity. Hence Unlikely CW pump our management
should consider Ash water pump for coating because One P/p consumed 0.6 MU per Year.