PHL 214 Critical Thinking Winter 2015 Dialogue Analysis Assignment Ealuating Dialogical Arguments ! intro"uce #hat it is that you #ill "o an" ho# you #ill go a$out "oing it ! each argument can $e a se%arate su$section ! shoul" hae a conclusion that e&%lains #hat you hae notice" a$out arguments haing analy'e" them ! no more than 5 "ou$le s%ace" %ages ! "o not inclu"e #hole "ialogues ! re(er to characters $y name an" )uote only releant statements ! e&%lain #hether the res%on"ent *secon" character+ has met the challenge o( argument or not an" e&%lain #hy you (eel they hae or hae not ! i( they hae not, reconstruct their %osition in such a #ay that it #oul" meet the challenge o( argument an" e&%lain #hy ! THE A-./ET3
> introduce what it is that you will do and how you will go
about doing it> each argument can be a separate subsection>
should have a conclusion that explains what you have noticed about
arguments having analyzed them
> no more than 5 double spaced pages> do not include whole
dialogues> refer to characters by name and quote only relevant
statements
> explain whether the respondent (second character) has met
the challenge of argument or not and explain why you feel they have
or have not> if they have not, reconstruct their position in
such a way that it would meet the challenge of argument and explain
why
