Upload
sfibc
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/7/2019 Courier Islander - Perhaps Duncan Not Sustainable'
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/courier-islander-perhaps-duncan-not-sustainable 1/2
Perhaps Duncan not 'sustainable'
COURIER-ISLANDER JANUARY 28, 2011
John Duncan's recent letter to the editor regarding the current Halibut allocation debate is very
misleading. He either is completely unaware of the issues, or worse yet, unwilling to react to his
constituents' legitimate concerns. Mr. Duncan's assertion that the flawed 2003 federal Liberal party's
decision on halibut allocation is required to maintain the "health and sustainability" of the North Pacific
halibut fishery is simply untrue. By all accounts the North Pacific halibut fishery has been and
continues to be one of the most sustainably managed fisheries in the world. This is not, and has not
been, in dispute by any halibut fishing sector.
The Canadian and United States Total Allowable Catch (TAC) of halibut in the North Pacific is set
each year by the International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC). The TAC for both countries is
arrived at by using detailed stock assessment data collected by independent scientists of the IPHC
through extensive sampling and catch reporting by all fishing sectors. How Canada divides up its TAC
between first nations, commercial and the recreational fishing sectors will not affect the sustainability
of halibut stocks in the North Pacific.
This dividing up or allocation of the current Canadian TAC is what is in dispute. I find it hard to believe
that Mr. Duncan does not know this. He is simply trying to "white wash" the issue to make it appear
that his governments' lack of movement on this issue has some basis. It doesn't. This is an issue of
allocation not conservation.
I feel the only way that to quickly resolve the issue of allocating Canada's TAC of halibut between the
recreational and commercial fisheries is for the government of Canada to immediately provide
sufficient funds to the recreational fishery to lease quota from the 400 plus commercial quota holders
through the Pacific Halibut Management Association (PMHA). Leased quota above the current 12 per
cent allocation will allow the recreational fishery to operate at reasonable limits and provide certainty
for the entire upcoming recreational fishery season. This is something that is critical to the "health
and sustainability" of coast communities. Commercial quota holders will be appropriately
compensated through standard quota leasing arrangements. The government can then "claw back"
what is in principle a loan to recreation fishery through either a halibut "stamp" (similar to the current
salmon "stamp") or an increase in license fees.
Mr. Duncan should be more concerned about the "health and sustainability" of the coast communities
he represents in Ottawa rather than fighting to maintaining the flawed halibut allocation decision by
the previous Liberal government.
His failure to act on this issue, in a timely fashion, has caused the "sustainability" of his position as our
Member of Parliament to definitely come into question.
1/28/2011 Perhaps Duncan not 'sustainable'
www.canada.com/story_print.html?id=… 1
8/7/2019 Courier Islander - Perhaps Duncan Not Sustainable'
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/courier-islander-perhaps-duncan-not-sustainable 2/2