14

Click here to load reader

COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik

COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC)

Road Pavement Forum11 May 2006

Elzbieta Sadzik

Page 2: COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik

COTO Road MaterialsCommittee (RMC)

GoalTo coordinate and guide SA development

in terms of: road building materials, pavement design, road network management, pavement construction, maintenance and

rehabilitation

Page 3: COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik

COTO RMC (cont)

Actions:● Facilitate technology transfer amongst road

authorities● Collate state of the art technology and practice● Develop national standards● Produce / revise relevant TRH and TMH

Page 4: COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik

COTO RMCMembers● Elzbieta Sadzik – GDPTRW (Chair)● Mervyn Henderson – WCPA● Rob Lindsay – KZN DOT● Simon Oloo – KZN DOT● Enrico Fletcher – GDPTRW● Carla Davis – Mpumalanga● Shadrack Marodi - Mpumalanga● Karl Arnold – Freestate● Kobus van der Walt – SANRAL● Lesley Johnson – DOT● Benoit Verhaeghe – CSIR Transportek● Clive Boshoff – Eastern Cape● Richard Rikhotso – Limpopo Road Agency● Jerome Mayimele - Limpopo Road Agency

Page 5: COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik

COTO RMC

Missing representation: North West Province Limpopo DOT

Page 6: COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik

COTO RMC

Two sub-committees: Materials testing – M. Henderson (Chair) Roads Network Management Systems

(RNMS) – M. Henderson (Chair)

Page 7: COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik

PRIORITIES FOR REVISION OF PUBLICATION

1. TMH1 – Standard Methods of Testing Road Construction Materials

2. New TMH on surveillance methods.

3. TRH12 – Guidelines for Pavement Rehabilitation

4. TRH4 – Pavement Design

5. TRH20 – Unpaved Roads

6. TMH8 – Traffic Counting

Page 8: COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik

Revision of publications - progress

TMH1 Set 1: A1to A5 – published by SABS end June

2006

Set 2: A6 and B18 + two new methods – second draft submitted to SABS end of May 2006

Set3: A7 and A8 + one new method – first draft to industry May 2006

All three sets published by SABS by the end of 2006 – SANRAL, PAWC

Page 9: COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik

Revision of publications - progress

New TMH on surveillance methods: Guidelines for Network Level Measurement of

Road Roughness – draft May 2006 - PAWC TRH 12 Guidelines for Pavement

Rehabilitation

Draft by end May 2006 - SANRAL

Page 10: COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik

Revision of publications - progress

TRH 4 Structural Design of Road Pavements

Revision of SA mechanistic empirical design method – PRAC H. Theyse – work proposal prepared for SANRAL

Development of a new design method proposal by Dr F Jooste

Page 11: COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik

Revision of publications - progress

TRH 20 Structural Design of Unpaved Roads

TOR prepared to be advertised for tenders – NDOT

TRH 8 Traffic counts

Guidelines for bitumen stabilised materials (FB and ETB)

Page 12: COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik

COTO RMC

Issues: Lack of formal structure for approvals and

publishing of documents - Road Coordinating Committee (RCC) not functioning

Lack of national research fund Need for other COTO committees to be

reactivated.

Page 13: COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik

COTO RMC

Points of interest New procurement system for professional

services: Competitive selection on balance between competence and price

Preference for accredited laboratories Request for a QMS from consulting engineers

(ISO 9001 or similar) Reactivation of COLTO specification committee

– compatibility with CIDB requirements and revision

Page 14: COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik

COTO RMC

Next meeting: October 2006