39
COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC Attila Komjathy, JPL Chunming Wang, USC Gary Rosen, USC JPL/USC GAIM [[email protected]]

COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

COSMIC and Space Weather

Anthony Mannucci, JPLBrian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USCGeorge Hajj, JPL, USCLukas Mandrake, JPLXiaoqing Pi, JPL, USCAttila Komjathy, JPLChunming Wang, USCGary Rosen, USC

JPL/USCGAIM

[[email protected]]

Page 2: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

2

ANASAgenda

• Ionospheric remote sensing the GPS way

• Ionospheric occultations

• The Global Assimilative Ionosphere Model

• Real-Time GAIM

• Goal

Page 3: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

3

ANASMotivation: Ionospheric Component of Space Weather

• Interest in the Earth’s ionosphere stems from practical needs and scientific interest

• Scientifically, the ionosphere is a medium of extraordinary complexity combining the physics of:

• Electromagnetism

• Plasmas (free charges)

• Neutral fluids

• Practically, the Earth’s ionosphere strongly affects radio signal propagation and produces currents

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 4: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

4

ANASIonospheric Regimes

Local Time: 13:00Event Time: 18:00 UT

See also:Mannucci et al., Geophys Res Lett 2005

CHAMPZenithTEC

Page 5: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

5

ANASGround-based GPS Remote Sensing

Iijima et al., Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 1999

Ionospheric Specification and Determination Workshop, JPL 1998

Non-data driven (IRI-95)Data driven (GIM)

Global GPS Receiver Network Global Ionospheric Map

Low Solar Activity (1998)

Page 6: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

6

ANASLEO-Based GPS Remote Sensing

Six-satellite COSMIC constellationLaunch March 2006

Low-Earth OrbiterGPS

3000 profiles/day

ElectronDensityProfile

COSMIC coverage

Page 7: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

7

ANASOccultation Geometry

ln(n(r)) = 1

πα

a2 – r2n2da

nr

(a) =2a 1

a'2 – a2

dln(n)da' da'

a

∞• Single Frequency Retrievals• Dual Frequency Retrievals

• TEC = const. x (L1 – L2)• ~ dTEC/dt

Page 8: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

8

ANASElectron Density Profiles from GPS/MET

See also: Kelley, Wong, Hajj, Mannucci Geophys Res Lett 2004

Page 9: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

9

ANASIonospheric Measurements

Space Assets Land AssetsIn-situ Cal/Val SitesRemote Network

Pre

sent

Fu

ture

• SSJ/4 (DMSP)• SSIES (DMSP)• SSMS (DMSP)• TED (POES)• MEPED (POES)• SSJ/5 (DMSP)

• SESS (NPOESS)

• CHAMP• SAC/C• IOX• GUVI (TIMED)• SSUSI (DMSP)• SSULI (DMSP)

• C/NOFS• COSMIC• GPSOS (NPOESS)• SESS (NPOESS)

• DISS• IGS• SumiNet• Regional GPS Network

• Incoherent Scattering Radar Sites

Page 10: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

10

ANASWhat is the Global Assimilative

Ionosphere Model?

• A Global Assimilative Ionospheric Model• Patterned after NWP models• Based on first-principles physics (approximate)• Solves the electro-hydrodynamics governing

the spatial and temporal evolution of electrondensity in the ionosphere

• Assimilates various types of ionospheric databy use of the Kalman filter and 4DVAR

• Ground-based TEC• Space-based absolute and relative TEC• In-situ under test• Beacon data under development• UV has undergone preliminary testing

Page 11: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

11

ANASMotivations for GAIM

• The existence of a wide range of ionospheric data

• Need for Accurate Ionospheric Calibration

• Navigation• Communication• Radar

• Monitoring of space weather events

• Mapping ionospheric currents (early stage)

• Improve our understanding of ionospheric response to solar activities and magnetic storms

• Indirect observation of upper atmosphere

Page 12: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

12

ANASData Assimilation in a Nutshell

DrivingForces

DrivingForces

Evaluating State At Measurements

Evaluating State At MeasurementsPhysics ModelPhysics Model

Kalman FilterKalman Filter

State and covariance

Forecast

State andcovarianceAnalysis

AdjustmentOf Parameters

4DVAR4DVAR

Innovation Vector

“State” is electron density field

Page 13: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

13

ANASDriving Forces (Input to Driving Forces (Input to

Physics Model)Physics Model)

EUV Solar EUV radiation flux Pa Auroral production (NOAA’s energy and flux patterns)Nn Neutral densities and composition (MSIS) E Electric field

Un Thermospheric wind (HWM)

Page 14: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

14

ANASKalman Filter Formulation

ok

tkk

ok xHm ε+=

rk

mk

ok εεε +=

qk

tkk

tk xx ε+Ψ=+1

State Model

Measurement Model

Noise Model

( ) k

Tmk

mk ME =εε ,

( ) k

Trk

rk RE =εε ,

( ) k

Tqk

qk QE =εε ,

( )fkk

okk

fk

ak xHmKxx −+=

( )1−++= kk

Tk

fkk

Tk

fkk MRHPHHPK

fkkk

fk

ak PHKPP −=

Kalman Filter

akk

fk xx Ψ=+1

kTk

akk

fk QPP +ΨΨ=+1

Simplification is to skip this update

State x is electron density within a voxel

Page 15: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

15

ANASKalman Considerations

• Accurate covariance and measurement noise needed

• Physics errors assumed zero mean (unbiased)

• Variational methods can be used to improve mean behavior

• Adjusts physics drivers to achieve zero-mean

• Covariances not updated

• Ensemble methods? (DART…)

• Implications of different data combinations not fully understood

• Method of update

• Variational methods maintain physical consistency of all data types

Page 16: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

16

ANASAssimilation Considerations

• GAIM I – Gauss Markov (Utah State U)

• GAIM II – Physics-based (Utah State U)

• JPL/USC – Physics-based

• JPL/USC 4DVAR – Driver adjustment

• It is important to maintain multiple methods and groups

DrivingForces

DrivingForces

Evaluating State At Measurements

Evaluating State At MeasurementsPhysics ModelPhysics Model

Kalman FilterKalman Filter

State and covariance

Forecast

State andcovarianceAnalysis

AdjustmentOf Parameters

4DVAR4DVAR

Innovation Vector

Page 17: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

17

ANASGPS Remote Sensing Started with TEC Maps

But 3D density fields are far more complicated…

Page 18: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

18

ANASGAIM “Maps” Are Three Dimensional Electron

Density Fields

Page 19: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

19

ANASGAIM vs. AbelComparisons at the Occultation Tangent Point

Profiles are obtained by:

• Abel Inversion (“abel”)

• GAIM Climate (no data) (“clim”)

• GAIM Analysis assimilating ground TEC data only (“ground”)

• GAIM Analysis assimilating IOX TEC data only (“iox”)

• GAIM Analysis assimilating both ground and IOX data (“ground+iox”)

IOXPaul Straus, Aerospace

Page 20: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

20

ANASEXAMPLES OF PROFILES RETRIEVED BY USEOF DIFFERENT DATA SETS

Page 21: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

21

ANASGAIM vs. Abel NmF2 Comparison

1011

1012

1011 1012

Climate Runs2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24

GAIM Assimilation NmF2

Abel NmF2, e/m3

1011

1012

1011 1012

GAIM Runs (Assimilating Ground Data Only)2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24

GAIM Assimilation NmF2

Abel NmF2, e/m3

1011

1012

1011 1012

GAIM Runs (Assimilating IOX Data Only)2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24

GAIM Assimilation NmF2

Abel NmF2, e/m3

1011

1012

1011 1012

GAIM Runs (Assimilating Ground and IOX Data)2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24

GAIM Assimilation NmF2

Abel NmF2, e/m3

No Data GroundData

OccData

Ground &Occ

NmF2: peakElectron density

Page 22: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

22

ANAS

200

300

400

500

600

700

200 300 400 500 600 700

Climate Runs2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24

GAIM Climate HmF2

Abel HmF2, km

200

300

400

500

600

700

200 300 400 500 600 700

Assimilation Runs (Ground Data Only)2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24

GAIM Assimilation HmF2

Abel HmF2, km

200

300

400

500

600

700

200 300 400 500 600 700

Assimilation Runs (Ground and IOX Data )2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24

GAIM Assimilation HmF2

Abel HmF2, km

GAIM vs. Abel HmF2 Comparison

200

300

400

500

600

700

200 300 400 500 600 700

Assimilation Runs (IOX Data Only)2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24

GAIM Assimilation HmF2

Abel HmF2, km

No Data GroundData

OccData

Ground &Occ

HmF2: peakheight

Page 23: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

23

ANASGlobal Ionosonde Sites

Page 24: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

24

ANASNmF2 Comparison:Bear Lake on 2004/07/28

Page 25: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

25

ANASNmF2 Comparison: Wallops Is. on 2004/07/28

Page 26: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

26

ANAS4DVAR

DrivingForces

DrivingForces

Evaluating State At Measurements

Evaluating State At MeasurementsPhysics ModelPhysics Model

Kalman FilterKalman Filter

State and covariance

Forecast

State andcovarianceAnalysis

AdjustmentOf Parameters

4DVAR4DVAR

Innovation Vector

Page 27: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

27

ANAS4DVAR

yk - Observations (e.g., total electron content - TEC) at epoch tk

W Covariance of observation errors

n - State variables (volume density)

Hk - Observation operator

- Model parameters related to driving forces or model inputs to

be adjusted

0 - Empirical parameters

P - Covariance of error in 0

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )01

01

1 );();();( ααααααα −−+−−= −

=

−∑ PtnHyWtnHynJ Tm

kkkk

Tkkk

Minimize the Cost Function:

Page 28: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

28

ANASParametrization of WindParametrization of Wind

144 wind parameters covering 30 latitudes globally

Page 29: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

29

ANAS

• Southward wind to represent storm time equatorward wind perturbation

• Decay as approaching lower latitudes

Meridional Wind PerturbationMeridional Wind Perturbation

Page 30: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

30

ANASWind EstimationWind Estimation

Page 31: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

31

ANASGlobal RT GAIM Prototype

• Input data is ground GPS TEC:• Every 5 minutes from 77 1-sec. streaming sites (~600 pts)

• Every hour from more (~100) sites for global coverage

• Sparse Kalman Filter• Update global 3D density grid every 5 minutes• elements in variable grid• Res: 2-3º in latitude, 7º in longitude, 30-50 km in altitude• Runs on a dual-CPU Linux workstation

• Validation:• Every hour against independent GPS TEC values

• Every 3-4 hours against vertical TEC from JASON• Every day (post-analysis) against ionosonde and other data

Page 32: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

32

ANASCombined Hourly & Streaming Sites

Black = current all hourly, Blue = 77+ streaming, Red = potential add-ons

Page 33: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

33

ANASConcept of Operations:Three GAIM Threads

t t + 6 hrst - 20 mins

Hourly GPS TECDelayed Kalman Thread(combine hourly & 5-min data)

5-min. GPS TEC Real-Time Kalman Thread

Forecast Thread(state transfer)

Page 34: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

34

ANASConsiderations for COSMIC

• Use a variant of the real-time implementation

• Ionospheric observables can be generated locally of acquired directly from CDAAC

• Output an updated global electron density grid

• Cadence TBD

• High latitudes excepted

• JPL has software ready for COSMIC (in principle)

• Observation matrix for GPS data type

• Ground and space data

• Model upgrades being worked

• Ionospheric work highly complementary to atmospheric studies for climate

• Data agreements…

Page 35: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

35

ANASConclusionConclusion

• GPS occultations provide very powerful and unique capabilities for ionospheric profiling/imaging

• COSMIC will be the first system to provide the 3D electron density in the ionosphere—greatly complemented by the existing ground system

• Data assimilation is a new comer to the ionosphere. Its importance is recognized by numerous scientists and many funding organization including NSF, DoD and NASA

• Importance of ionospheric specification and prediction

• Operational users

• Indirect sensing of the upper atmosphere, magnetic and solar activities

• Improved understanding of the physical processes coupling the sun, heliosphere, magnetosphere and the ionosphere

• Improved estimates of ionospheric currents

Page 36: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

36

ANASGoal

• Demonstrate value of GPS occultation constellation for scientific and practical applications

• 2-hour data latency should demonstrate improvement

• 15-minute data latency target should be maintained

• Much detailed work needs to be done

Page 37: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

37

ANASLocation Of Strong Scintillation(Amplitude)

Straus et al., GRL 2003 February & March, 2002

Page 38: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

38

ANASHigh Latitude Scintillation At Solar Minimum (Phase)

Pi et al., GRL 1997

Phase fluctuation index

Page 39: COSMIC and Space Weather Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USC George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing Pi, JPL, USC

39

ANASGlobal Morphology Of Scintillation

Aarons, 1996