Upload
ami-willis
View
229
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
COSMIC and Space Weather
Anthony Mannucci, JPLBrian Wilson, JPL Vardan Akopian, JPL, USCGeorge Hajj, JPL, USCLukas Mandrake, JPLXiaoqing Pi, JPL, USCAttila Komjathy, JPLChunming Wang, USCGary Rosen, USC
JPL/USCGAIM
2
ANASAgenda
• Ionospheric remote sensing the GPS way
• Ionospheric occultations
• The Global Assimilative Ionosphere Model
• Real-Time GAIM
• Goal
3
ANASMotivation: Ionospheric Component of Space Weather
• Interest in the Earth’s ionosphere stems from practical needs and scientific interest
• Scientifically, the ionosphere is a medium of extraordinary complexity combining the physics of:
• Electromagnetism
• Plasmas (free charges)
• Neutral fluids
• Practically, the Earth’s ionosphere strongly affects radio signal propagation and produces currents
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
4
ANASIonospheric Regimes
Local Time: 13:00Event Time: 18:00 UT
See also:Mannucci et al., Geophys Res Lett 2005
CHAMPZenithTEC
5
ANASGround-based GPS Remote Sensing
Iijima et al., Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 1999
Ionospheric Specification and Determination Workshop, JPL 1998
Non-data driven (IRI-95)Data driven (GIM)
Global GPS Receiver Network Global Ionospheric Map
Low Solar Activity (1998)
6
ANASLEO-Based GPS Remote Sensing
Six-satellite COSMIC constellationLaunch March 2006
Low-Earth OrbiterGPS
3000 profiles/day
ElectronDensityProfile
COSMIC coverage
7
ANASOccultation Geometry
ln(n(r)) = 1
πα
a2 – r2n2da
nr
∞
(a) =2a 1
a'2 – a2
dln(n)da' da'
a
∞• Single Frequency Retrievals• Dual Frequency Retrievals
• TEC = const. x (L1 – L2)• ~ dTEC/dt
8
ANASElectron Density Profiles from GPS/MET
See also: Kelley, Wong, Hajj, Mannucci Geophys Res Lett 2004
9
ANASIonospheric Measurements
Space Assets Land AssetsIn-situ Cal/Val SitesRemote Network
Pre
sent
Fu
ture
• SSJ/4 (DMSP)• SSIES (DMSP)• SSMS (DMSP)• TED (POES)• MEPED (POES)• SSJ/5 (DMSP)
• SESS (NPOESS)
• CHAMP• SAC/C• IOX• GUVI (TIMED)• SSUSI (DMSP)• SSULI (DMSP)
• C/NOFS• COSMIC• GPSOS (NPOESS)• SESS (NPOESS)
• DISS• IGS• SumiNet• Regional GPS Network
• Incoherent Scattering Radar Sites
10
ANASWhat is the Global Assimilative
Ionosphere Model?
• A Global Assimilative Ionospheric Model• Patterned after NWP models• Based on first-principles physics (approximate)• Solves the electro-hydrodynamics governing
the spatial and temporal evolution of electrondensity in the ionosphere
• Assimilates various types of ionospheric databy use of the Kalman filter and 4DVAR
• Ground-based TEC• Space-based absolute and relative TEC• In-situ under test• Beacon data under development• UV has undergone preliminary testing
11
ANASMotivations for GAIM
• The existence of a wide range of ionospheric data
• Need for Accurate Ionospheric Calibration
• Navigation• Communication• Radar
• Monitoring of space weather events
• Mapping ionospheric currents (early stage)
• Improve our understanding of ionospheric response to solar activities and magnetic storms
• Indirect observation of upper atmosphere
12
ANASData Assimilation in a Nutshell
DrivingForces
DrivingForces
Evaluating State At Measurements
Evaluating State At MeasurementsPhysics ModelPhysics Model
Kalman FilterKalman Filter
State and covariance
Forecast
State andcovarianceAnalysis
AdjustmentOf Parameters
4DVAR4DVAR
Innovation Vector
“State” is electron density field
13
ANASDriving Forces (Input to Driving Forces (Input to
Physics Model)Physics Model)
EUV Solar EUV radiation flux Pa Auroral production (NOAA’s energy and flux patterns)Nn Neutral densities and composition (MSIS) E Electric field
Un Thermospheric wind (HWM)
14
ANASKalman Filter Formulation
ok
tkk
ok xHm ε+=
rk
mk
ok εεε +=
qk
tkk
tk xx ε+Ψ=+1
State Model
Measurement Model
Noise Model
( ) k
Tmk
mk ME =εε ,
( ) k
Trk
rk RE =εε ,
( ) k
Tqk
qk QE =εε ,
( )fkk
okk
fk
ak xHmKxx −+=
( )1−++= kk
Tk
fkk
Tk
fkk MRHPHHPK
fkkk
fk
ak PHKPP −=
Kalman Filter
akk
fk xx Ψ=+1
kTk
akk
fk QPP +ΨΨ=+1
Simplification is to skip this update
State x is electron density within a voxel
15
ANASKalman Considerations
• Accurate covariance and measurement noise needed
• Physics errors assumed zero mean (unbiased)
• Variational methods can be used to improve mean behavior
• Adjusts physics drivers to achieve zero-mean
• Covariances not updated
• Ensemble methods? (DART…)
• Implications of different data combinations not fully understood
• Method of update
• Variational methods maintain physical consistency of all data types
16
ANASAssimilation Considerations
• GAIM I – Gauss Markov (Utah State U)
• GAIM II – Physics-based (Utah State U)
• JPL/USC – Physics-based
• JPL/USC 4DVAR – Driver adjustment
• It is important to maintain multiple methods and groups
DrivingForces
DrivingForces
Evaluating State At Measurements
Evaluating State At MeasurementsPhysics ModelPhysics Model
Kalman FilterKalman Filter
State and covariance
Forecast
State andcovarianceAnalysis
AdjustmentOf Parameters
4DVAR4DVAR
Innovation Vector
17
ANASGPS Remote Sensing Started with TEC Maps
But 3D density fields are far more complicated…
18
ANASGAIM “Maps” Are Three Dimensional Electron
Density Fields
19
ANASGAIM vs. AbelComparisons at the Occultation Tangent Point
Profiles are obtained by:
• Abel Inversion (“abel”)
• GAIM Climate (no data) (“clim”)
• GAIM Analysis assimilating ground TEC data only (“ground”)
• GAIM Analysis assimilating IOX TEC data only (“iox”)
• GAIM Analysis assimilating both ground and IOX data (“ground+iox”)
IOXPaul Straus, Aerospace
20
ANASEXAMPLES OF PROFILES RETRIEVED BY USEOF DIFFERENT DATA SETS
21
ANASGAIM vs. Abel NmF2 Comparison
1011
1012
1011 1012
Climate Runs2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24
GAIM Assimilation NmF2
Abel NmF2, e/m3
1011
1012
1011 1012
GAIM Runs (Assimilating Ground Data Only)2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24
GAIM Assimilation NmF2
Abel NmF2, e/m3
1011
1012
1011 1012
GAIM Runs (Assimilating IOX Data Only)2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24
GAIM Assimilation NmF2
Abel NmF2, e/m3
1011
1012
1011 1012
GAIM Runs (Assimilating Ground and IOX Data)2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24
GAIM Assimilation NmF2
Abel NmF2, e/m3
No Data GroundData
OccData
Ground &Occ
NmF2: peakElectron density
22
ANAS
200
300
400
500
600
700
200 300 400 500 600 700
Climate Runs2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24
GAIM Climate HmF2
Abel HmF2, km
200
300
400
500
600
700
200 300 400 500 600 700
Assimilation Runs (Ground Data Only)2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24
GAIM Assimilation HmF2
Abel HmF2, km
200
300
400
500
600
700
200 300 400 500 600 700
Assimilation Runs (Ground and IOX Data )2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24
GAIM Assimilation HmF2
Abel HmF2, km
GAIM vs. Abel HmF2 Comparison
200
300
400
500
600
700
200 300 400 500 600 700
Assimilation Runs (IOX Data Only)2002-Jul-22 to 2002-Jul-24
GAIM Assimilation HmF2
Abel HmF2, km
No Data GroundData
OccData
Ground &Occ
HmF2: peakheight
23
ANASGlobal Ionosonde Sites
24
ANASNmF2 Comparison:Bear Lake on 2004/07/28
25
ANASNmF2 Comparison: Wallops Is. on 2004/07/28
26
ANAS4DVAR
DrivingForces
DrivingForces
Evaluating State At Measurements
Evaluating State At MeasurementsPhysics ModelPhysics Model
Kalman FilterKalman Filter
State and covariance
Forecast
State andcovarianceAnalysis
AdjustmentOf Parameters
4DVAR4DVAR
Innovation Vector
27
ANAS4DVAR
yk - Observations (e.g., total electron content - TEC) at epoch tk
W Covariance of observation errors
n - State variables (volume density)
Hk - Observation operator
- Model parameters related to driving forces or model inputs to
be adjusted
0 - Empirical parameters
P - Covariance of error in 0
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )01
01
1 );();();( ααααααα −−+−−= −
=
−∑ PtnHyWtnHynJ Tm
kkkk
Tkkk
Minimize the Cost Function:
28
ANASParametrization of WindParametrization of Wind
144 wind parameters covering 30 latitudes globally
29
ANAS
• Southward wind to represent storm time equatorward wind perturbation
• Decay as approaching lower latitudes
Meridional Wind PerturbationMeridional Wind Perturbation
30
ANASWind EstimationWind Estimation
31
ANASGlobal RT GAIM Prototype
• Input data is ground GPS TEC:• Every 5 minutes from 77 1-sec. streaming sites (~600 pts)
• Every hour from more (~100) sites for global coverage
• Sparse Kalman Filter• Update global 3D density grid every 5 minutes• elements in variable grid• Res: 2-3º in latitude, 7º in longitude, 30-50 km in altitude• Runs on a dual-CPU Linux workstation
• Validation:• Every hour against independent GPS TEC values
• Every 3-4 hours against vertical TEC from JASON• Every day (post-analysis) against ionosonde and other data
32
ANASCombined Hourly & Streaming Sites
Black = current all hourly, Blue = 77+ streaming, Red = potential add-ons
33
ANASConcept of Operations:Three GAIM Threads
t t + 6 hrst - 20 mins
Hourly GPS TECDelayed Kalman Thread(combine hourly & 5-min data)
5-min. GPS TEC Real-Time Kalman Thread
Forecast Thread(state transfer)
34
ANASConsiderations for COSMIC
• Use a variant of the real-time implementation
• Ionospheric observables can be generated locally of acquired directly from CDAAC
• Output an updated global electron density grid
• Cadence TBD
• High latitudes excepted
• JPL has software ready for COSMIC (in principle)
• Observation matrix for GPS data type
• Ground and space data
• Model upgrades being worked
• Ionospheric work highly complementary to atmospheric studies for climate
• Data agreements…
35
ANASConclusionConclusion
• GPS occultations provide very powerful and unique capabilities for ionospheric profiling/imaging
• COSMIC will be the first system to provide the 3D electron density in the ionosphere—greatly complemented by the existing ground system
• Data assimilation is a new comer to the ionosphere. Its importance is recognized by numerous scientists and many funding organization including NSF, DoD and NASA
• Importance of ionospheric specification and prediction
• Operational users
• Indirect sensing of the upper atmosphere, magnetic and solar activities
• Improved understanding of the physical processes coupling the sun, heliosphere, magnetosphere and the ionosphere
• Improved estimates of ionospheric currents
36
ANASGoal
• Demonstrate value of GPS occultation constellation for scientific and practical applications
• 2-hour data latency should demonstrate improvement
• 15-minute data latency target should be maintained
• Much detailed work needs to be done
37
ANASLocation Of Strong Scintillation(Amplitude)
Straus et al., GRL 2003 February & March, 2002
38
ANASHigh Latitude Scintillation At Solar Minimum (Phase)
Pi et al., GRL 1997
Phase fluctuation index
39
ANASGlobal Morphology Of Scintillation
Aarons, 1996