Upload
barnard-murphy
View
218
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Chpt 7 Slide number 1
ForeignDirect
Investment
Chapter 7
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 2
Opening Case - Starbucks
In the late 1990s, Starbucks opened stores in Taiwan, China, Singapore, Thailand, New Zealand, South Korea, and Malaysia.
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Photo of Starbucks in Taipei, Taiwan by W.T.G. Richardson
In Asia, Starbucks’ most common strategy was to license its format to a local operator in return for initial licensing fees and royalties on store revenues
Chpt 7 Slide number 3
Definitions
• Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)The acquisition or construction of physical capital ($$) by a firm from one (source) country in another (host) country
• Multinational Enterprise (MNE)A firm that owns business operations in more than one country
• Green Field InvestmentEstablishing a new operation in a foreign country
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 4
Foreign Direct Investment in the World Economy
• Flow of FDI refers to the amount of FDI undertaken over a given time period (normally a year).
• Stock of FDI refers to the total accumulated value of foreign-owned assets at a given time.
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 5
Foreign Direct Investment in the World Economy
• Outflows of FDI refers to the flow of FDI OUT of a country.• This would mean Canadian companies
buying property and/or setting up operations in another country
• Example – TD Bank in Canada buying Commerce Bancorp in the U.S. in 2007 and acquiring all of their branches
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 6
Foreign Direct Investment in the World Economy
• Inflows of FDI refers to the flow of FDI INTO a country.
• When the CPR was being built across Canada, the government gave land to the CPR company and on this land the CPR built many elaborate hotels and resorts - some of which became famous Canadian landmarks – like the Royal York Hotel in Toronto.
• In 2006, Fairmont (CP Hotels) sold out for $3.8 billion to Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdulaziz Alsaud
• ThereforeCP Hotels were now foreign owned
• In 2010 the Prince sold some shares and dropped to 35 per cent from 58 per centownership
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 7
UNCTAD
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Many people talking about FDI quote information from UNCTAD
UNCTAD, a United Nations entity, is the most authoritative and reliable source of information about global FDI by country and by activity and its statistics and diagrams are quoted equally by the right and left wings.
www.unctad.org
Chpt 7 Slide number 8
Growth of FDIFDI Prospects in Developed Countries, 2007–2009: Responses to UNCTAD survey (per cent of respondents)
Source: 2007 World Investment Review
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 9
The World’s Top 100 Non-Financial National corporations Ranked by Foreign Assets, 2005 ($ millions)
Source: UNCTAD/Erasmus University database, World Investment Report, 2003.
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 10
The Direction of FDI
• Historically, most FDI has been directed at the developed nations around the world, as firms based in these countries invested in each others’ markets.
• During the past few decades, the United States has been the favourite target of FDI inflows.
• The U.S. is the only country in the world with a population over 200 million AND a comparatively high GDP per capita
• Which simply means there are a lot of Americans, and they have a lot of money to buy stuff
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 11
Source of FDI
• Since World War II, the United States has been the largest source country for FDI,
• a position it retained during the late 1990s and throughout the 2000s. • Meaning American companies are going to other
countries and buying up other companies and resources
• Other important source countries include• The United Kingdom,
• France,
• and Japan.
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 12
Forms of FDI:Acquisitions vs. Green Field Investment
FDI can take the form of:Acquisition of, or a merger with, an existing local firm in the destination marketGreen Field Investment in a new facility in the destination market
• The majority of cross-border investment is in the form of mergers and acquisitions rather than Green Field Investments
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 13
Definitions
• Green Field InvestmentThis is a slang expression which originally referred to the fact that many of these types of investments involved the buying of real-estate and building something
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
That is to say: there was a “green field” and the land was bought for the purpose of erecting some structure
Chpt 7 Slide number 14
Canada’s CaseFDI Flows into Canada and Canadian Direct Investment, 1993–2006 ($ billions)- Companies of other countries investing in Canada
Source: Statistics Canada, CANSIM
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 15
Canada’s CaseFDI Flows into Canada and Canadian Direct Investment, 2000 - 2009 ($ billions)- Companies of other countries investing in Canada
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 16
Canada’s CaseCanadian Foreign Direct Investment Abroad, by Top-10 Destinations,2006 ($ billions)
Source: Industry Canada
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 17
Canada’s CaseCanadian Foreign Direct Investment Abroad, by Top-10 Destinations,2009 ($ billions)
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 18
Canada - U.S.
• In the field of international trade, until 2007, Canada and the United States shared the largest bilateral flow of goods, services, people, capital, and investments between any two countries in the world.
• In 2008 China nudged passed Canada as top exporter to the United States• It should be noted a large part of Chinese exports to
the U.S. are in fact from American companies in China, like Nike exporting to Nike USA, and subsidiary companies of Wal-Mart exporting to Wal-Mart USA
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 19
Canada - U.S.
• During this same time frame, Canada’s exports to the United States totalled $313 billion USD,
• Mexican exports to the U.S. where $210 billion USD
• The recent and dramatic strengthening in the Canadian dollar has given firms looking to expand south of the border substantially increased buying power
• For the most part, gains in FDI outflow are owing to the rise of Canadian affiliates and subsidiaries in the United States.
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 20
Why Foreign Direct Investment
…when two alternatives are available?
• Exporting and
• Licensing
• The question is an important one given that foreign direct investment can be both expensive and risky when compared to exporting and licensing.
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 21
licensing
• Occurs when a firm (the licensor) licenses the right to produce its product, use its production processes, or use its brand name or trademark to another firm (the licensee).
• In return for giving the licensee these rights, the licensor collects a royalty fee on every unit the licensee sells.
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 22
Why Foreign Direct Investment?
• FDI is expensive because a firm must bear the costs of establishing production facilities in a foreign country
or of acquiring a foreign enterprise.
• FDI is risky because of the problems associated with doing business in a different culture where the “rules of the game” may be very different.
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 23
Why Foreign Direct Investment?
Because limitations of exporting and licensing
are means for capitalizing on foreign market opportunities.Limitations of Exporting
Exporting is constrained by transportation costs and trade barriers. When transportation costs are added to production costs, it becomes unprofitable to ship some products over a large distance. Products of low value-to-weight ratio can be produced in almost any locationExamples: cement, soft drinksProducts with a high value-to weight ratio: transport costs are normally a very minor component of total landed cost.Examples: electronic components, personal computers, medical equipment
Limitations of Licensing
Internalization theory explains why firms often prefer foreign direct investment over licensing as a strategy for entering foreign markets.1.Licensing may result in a firm giving away valuable technological know-how to a potential foreign competitor. 2.Licensing does not give a firm the tight control over manufacturing, marketing, and strategy in a foreign country. 3.When the firm’s competitive advantage is based not so much on its products, as on the management, marketing, and manufacturing capabilities that produce those products.
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 24
Pattern of Foreign Direct Investment
• Strategic Behaviour• Oligopoly
• An industry composed of a limited number of large firms.
• Multipoint competition• Happens when two or more enterprises
encounter each other in different regional markets, national markets, or industries.
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 25
• Eclectic Paradigm• An economic model used to evaluate
a company's strategy to expand its operations through foreign direct investment.
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Pattern of Foreign Direct Investment
Chpt 7 Slide number 26
Eclectic Paradigm MODEL
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
Chpt 7 Slide number 27
The “Political Environment” and FDI
• Government policy toward FDI has typically been driven by political ideology.
• Historically, ideology toward FDI has ranged from a radical stance that is hostile to all, to the non-interventionist principle of free market economics
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
How Political Ideology effects Foreign Direct Investment
Starbucks – SeoulBy W.T.G. Richardson
Chpt 7 Slide number 28
The “Political Environment” and FDI
The radical view • The radical view - Marxist political and economic
theory
• Argues that the multinational enterprise (MNE) is an instrument of imperialist domination
• They see the MNE as a tool for exploiting host countries to the exclusive benefit of their capitalist-imperialist home countries
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
How Political Ideology effects Foreign Direct Investment
Chpt 7 Slide number 29
The “Political Environment” and FDI
• The radical view • They argue that MNEs extract profits from the
host country and take them to their home country
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
How Political Ideology effects Foreign Direct Investment
Starbucks - Beijing
Chpt 7 Slide number 30
The “Political Environment” and FDI
The free market view• argues that international production should be
distributed among countries according to the theory of comparative advantage.
• That is, countries should specialize in the production of those goods and services that they can produce most efficiently
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
How Political Ideology effects Foreign Direct Investment
Chpt 7 Slide number 31
The “Political Environment” and FDI
Pragmatic Nationalism• In practice, many countries have adopted neither a
radical policy nor a free market policy toward FDI, but instead a policy that can best be described as pragmatic nationalism.
• The pragmatic nationalist view is that FDI has both benefits and costs.
• FDI can benefit a host country by bringing capital, skills, technology, and jobs, but those benefits often come at a cost.
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto
How Political Ideology effects Foreign Direct Investment
Chpt 7 Slide number 32
Benefits of FDI to the Nation State
Host Country Home Country• Resource-transfer effects• Employment effects - FDI
brings jobs to a host country
• Balance of payment effects.
• FDI is a substitute for imports of goods and services
• MNE uses the subsidiary in the host country to export goods and services to other countries
• Balance of payments from inward flow of foreign earnings.
• Positive employment effects when a subsidiary demands home country exports of capital equipment.
• Home country MNE learns skills transferable in technologies for use in the home country.
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto3
Chpt 7 Slide number 33
Costs of FDI to the Nation State
Host Country Home Country• Adverse effects on
competition Foreign subsidiaries have
strong economic power to put local competitors out of market
• Adverse effects on the balance of payments.
Against the initial capital inflow that comes with FDI must be the outflow of earnings to be repatriated
• National sovereignty and autonomy
• Balance of payments from outward FDI
• Employment effect from outward FDI
Global Business Today 3rd Edition ©2011 McGraw Hill Ryerson All rights reservedPowerPoints by Prof. W. Tim G. Richardson, Seneca College and University of Toronto