Click here to load reader

Cellular Array-based Delay-insensitive Asynchronous Circuits

  • View

  • Download

Embed Size (px)

Text of Cellular Array-based Delay-insensitive Asynchronous Circuits

  • 1

    Cellular Array-based Delay-insensitive Asynchronous

    Circuits Design and Test for Nanocomputing Systems

    Jia Di Parag K. Lala

    [email protected] [email protected]

    Comp. Science & Comp. Eng. Engineering & Information Science

    University of Arkansas Texas A&M University at Texarkana

    Fayetteville, AR 72701 Texarkana, TX 75501


    This paper presents the design, layout, and testability analysis of delay-insensitive circuits on

    cellular arrays for nanocomputing system design. In delay-insensitive circuits the delay on a

    signal path does not affect the correctness of circuit behavior. The combination of delay-

    insensitive circuit style and cellular arrays is a useful step to implement nanocomputing systems.

    In the approach proposed in this paper the circuit expressions corresponding to a design are

    first converted into Reed-Muller forms and then implemented using delay-insensitive Reed-

    Muller cells. The design and layout of the Reed-Muller cell using primitives has been described

    in detail. The effects of stuck-at faults in both delay-insensitive primitives and gates have been

    analyzed. Since circuits implemented in Reed-Muller forms constructed by the Reed-Muller cells

    can be easily tested offline, the proposed approach for delay-insensitive circuit design improves

    a circuits testability. Potential physical implementation of cellular arrays and its area overhead

    are also discussed.

    Index terms: cellular arrays, delay-insensitive circuit; Reed-Muller expression, stuck-at fault;

    layout, nanoscale circuit

  • 2

    1. Introduction

    Complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) has been the dominant technology for

    implementing VLSI systems because it provides a good trade-off of high speed and small area.

    The continuous decrease in transistor feature size has been pushing the CMOS process to its

    physical limits caused by ultra-thin gate oxides, short channel effects, doping fluctuations, and

    the unavailability of lithography in nanoscale range. To continue the size/speed improvement

    trends according to Moores Law, nanoelectronic and molecular electronic devices are needed. A

    significant amount of research has been done in nanoscale computing system design [1-5].

    Although recent research have resulted in the development of basic logic elements and simple

    circuits in nanoscale, there are still debates on what logic style and architecture will be the best

    for nanocomputers. A family of asynchronous logic called delay-insensitive circuits has drawn

    attention in recent years. The advantages of delay-insensitive circuits include flexible timing

    requirement, low power, high modularity, etc. These characteristics fit the needs of nanoscale

    computing. Cellular arrays have an ideal architecture for implementing delay-insensitive circuits

    in nanoscale; they have highly regular structures, simple cell behavior, and flexible scalability

    [6-7]. The regular structure together with delay-insensitive circuit style makes cellular arrays a

    viable option for implementing nanocomputing systems.

    In this paper the design and layout of delay-insensitive circuits on cellular arrays are

    presented. One appealing approach to design nanoscale circuits is to express the logic functions

    in the Reed-Muller form using AND and XOR gates only [8]; the Reed-Muller representation of

    Boolean functions have been discussed in detail in section 5. The main motivation for using the

    Reed-Muller form is that the testability of circuits implemented from Reed-Muller expansions is

    considerably improved compared to that of their original forms. This paper presents the design

  • 3

    and layout of a delay-insensitive Reed-Muller cell which is composed of the three primitives

    proposed in [6]. In addition, a potential physical implementation for asynchronous circuits on

    cellular arrays introduced by IBM researchers [9], and the effects of possible stuck-at faults on

    this molecular implementation have been analyzed. Certain faults in these circuits can be

    detected during normal operation without applying any external test patterns i.e. the faults can be

    detected on-line [8]. However, faults that escape on-line detection can be easily detected off-line

    by applying a few external test patterns; this is possible because of the Reed-Muller expression-

    based structure of the delay-insensitive circuits.

    2. Delay-insensitive circuits

    Currently synchronous logic is predominantly used in commercial integrated circuit chip

    design. Synchronous logic uses a global clock to control logic behavior. On the other hand

    asynchronous logic delay-insensitive circuits do not require a clock. Delay-insensitivity is

    achieved by checking the completion of an operation in a subblock and sending a signal to

    previous subblock stages to acknowledge the completion. The clock-less operation of such

    circuits lead to the following benefits:

    No clock skew Since delay-insensitive asynchronous circuits have no globally

    distributed clock, clock skew need not be considered.

    High energy efficiency Delay-insensitive circuits generally have transitions only where

    and when involved in the current computation. Some implementations inherently eliminate

    glitches, therefore decreasing energy consumption.

  • 4

    Robust external input handling Since signals do not need to be synchronized with a

    clock, delay-insensitive circuits accommodate external inputs thus avoiding the metastability

    problem in synchronous circuits [10].

    Low noise and low emission In mixed-signal circuits, a digital subcircuit usually

    generates noise and/or emits electromagnetic (EM) radiation which affects the whole circuit

    performance. Due to the absence of a complex clocking network, delay-insensitive circuits may

    have better noise and EM properties. [11]

    Asynchronous circuits are very different from Boolean logic based synchronous circuits and

    are usually more difficult to design without appropriate CAD tools. This remains a major

    obstacle to the use of asynchronous logic systems. However, in recent years the clock skew

    problem in synchronous circuits is becoming increasingly critical. Because of above listed

    advantages delay-insensitive circuits utilizing dual-rail encoding are becoming popular. Dual-rail

    encoding uses a two-rail code to represent a data bit as shown in Table 1 [12].

    State Rail 1 Rail 0 Spacer 0 0 Data 0 0 1 Data 1 1 0 Invalid 1 1

    Table 1 Dual-rail encoding truth table

    As can be seen in Table 1, besides Data 0 and Data 1 there is a spacer state denoted by both

    rails being logic low. For each circuit element, after a data bit has been processed, it goes to a

    spacer state before it is allowed to process the next data. This is known as the return-to-spacer

    protocol. This return-to-spacer procedure is actually a self-resetting step of the circuit operation.

    Delay-insensitivity is achieved by checking the completion of an operation in a subblock and

    sending a signal to previous subblock stages to acknowledge the completion. Dual-rail encoding

    is used to design delay-insensitive circuits in this paper.

  • 5

    3. Asynchronous cellular arrays

    Cellular arrays have been widely studied as a computational model. A cellular array is a d-

    dimensional array of identical cells, which are placed next to each other. Each cell has a finite

    number of states. Based on its current state and the states of its neighbor cells, the cell can

    change its state by an operation known as a transition [6]. Following certain transition rules, the

    cellular arrays are able to perform logic computation as well as data storage.

    In this paper, two-dimensional cellular arrays are used. Each cell has four bits, represented by

    rectangles located at north, south, east, and west, respectively, as shown in Fig. 1. If one or more

    rectangles in a cell are filled a signal is said to have arrived at this cell. An empty rectangle

    represents a logic 0 and a filled rectangle (also known as a block) represents a logic 1, as

    shown in Fig. 2. Depending on the physical implementation, signals can be generated by

    different phenomena. In the molecular cascade structure which will be explained in the next

    section, signals are generated by CO molecular hopping.


    West East


    Fig. 1 Cell structure

    Fig. 2 A 2-D cellular array

  • 6

    Based on the von Neumann neighborhood definition, the cells next state will be determined

    by its current state and states of the four nearest bits of its nearest orthogonal cells as shown in

    Fig. 3. The letters in the rectangles of each cell represent the bit-states (0 or 1) of the cell.

    Fig. 3 Transition of cell

    A cell changes its state based on previously mentioned transition rules as shown in Table 2

    below [6]. There is no timing restraint on such transitions, except that two neighboring cells may

    not be updated simultaneously. Instead, the cells are updated in order following the signal

Search related