Upload
brandy-vail
View
224
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cables, Plates & Onlay Cables, Plates & Onlay AllograftsAllografts
Mark AshworthMark Ashworth
Torbay HospitalTorbay Hospital
Cables, Plates & Onlay Cables, Plates & Onlay AllograftsAllografts
• Guide you through the ‘menu’Guide you through the ‘menu’
• Discuss the merits of the various ‘dishes’Discuss the merits of the various ‘dishes’
• Perhaps make a recommendation or twoPerhaps make a recommendation or two
• Set the scene for the ‘main course’ to Set the scene for the ‘main course’ to followfollow
CablesCables
CablesCables
• Current indications
– Prophylactically • Increased hoop stress resistance (Tsiridis, 2003)
– Temporary• Stabilisation pending plate, strut, THR insertion
– Definitive• Simple periprosthetic # - alone
– Calcar splits on insertion– B1 spiral #
• Complex periprosthetic # - with other devices– Plates, mesh, impaction or strut graft….
• Contra-indications– Transverse/short oblique periprosthetic # (poor torsion/bending rigidity)
Cables Cables a – Stainless Steel wirea – Stainless Steel wire• Knot Strength
– Thicker wire = stronger knots (Wilson 1985)
– >2 twists = NO increase in strength (Schultz 1985)
– Double loop knot strength > square knot > twist (Roe, 1997 & 2002)
– Simple twist easily untwists with little tension ((Meyer 2003)
– Knot twistKnot twist 100000 cycle fatigue stronger>twist (Bostrom 1994)
Knot twist
AO Loop
Double loop
Square knot AO loop & tuck
Symmetrical Wire
twist wrap
Cables Cables b - Multi filamentb - Multi filament• Cable material
– Zimmer & Biomet - Stainless steel, cobalt chrome & titanium – De puy - Stainless steel 1.8mm– Dall Miles - Stainless steel & Cr Co Mo (vitallium)
• Cable strength– Fatigue – cables superior to SS wire (Weiss 1996) – Ultimate strength – 1 cable > 1 wire (Carls 1997); but 1 cable = 2
wires (Liu 1997)
– Chrome cobalt > stainless steel
• Cable cost– Double loop cerclage ~10x less £££££ than cables (Ritter 2006)
Cables Cables c - Nylonc - Nylon
• Nylon core, UHMWPe sheath (Ti/Al/V clasp - some Cr Co)
• Contraindication if can catch on mesh or plate edge (Kinamed)
• Elastic energy stored after initial relaxation– Iso-elastic cable maintains continuous compressive
forces = initial compression of cerclage wires
– Compensates for # movement & decreased risk of
cable slip
Cables Cables c - Nylonc - Nylon• Ultimate strength
Cerclage TypeCerclage Type Ultimate Tensile StrengthUltimate Tensile Strength
NylonNylon SuperCable SuperCable 1000N1000N
Stainless steel wireStainless steel wire 280 - 600N280 - 600N
Titanium alloy cableTitanium alloy cable 1000 - 1840N1000 - 1840N
Cobalt-chrome alloy cableCobalt-chrome alloy cable 1200 - 2800N1200 - 2800N
Cables Cables c - Nylonc - Nylon• Fatigue strength
Breakage in cabling systems are generally fatigue failure not tensile failures
Cerclage TypeCerclage Type Cyclic LoadCyclic Load Cycles to FailureCycles to Failure
NylonNylon SuperCable SuperCable 400N400N No failures @ 1 million cyclesNo failures @ 1 million cycles
Stainless steel wireStainless steel wire 140-320N140-320N 100,000 cycles100,000 cycles
Titanium alloy cableTitanium alloy cable 40 – 200 N40 – 200 N 100,000 – 1 million cycles100,000 – 1 million cycles
Cobalt-chrome alloy cableCobalt-chrome alloy cable 80 – 200 N80 – 200 N 100,000 – 1 million cycles100,000 – 1 million cycles
PlatesPlates
PlatesPlates
•“2B or not 2B, that is the question”
– Lindahl 2006 Swedish register 245 cases-
• Single plate ORIF higher risk of failure with B1#
• #’s were probably un-recognised B2 (revision best)
– Prosthesis considered loose until proven otherwise – Infer…..’ no place for fixing #, then later revising stem ‘
PlatesPlates
a.a. Non locked Non locked
b.b. LockedLocked
c.c. Cable plate systemsCable plate systems– Dall Miles 1983Dall Miles 1983
PlatesPlatesa- Non Locking platesa- Non Locking plates• Ogden (1978) - Proximal cables, distal screws
– Plate & screws (in vitro) > Ogden > 2 struts > cabled plate
– Clinical results = 80% good/union
• Standard plate - All Screws
– 90 : 90 plating = best biomechanics– Soft tissue strip++– 90% union with broad DCP
PlatesPlatesa- Non Locking platesa- Non Locking plates• Old 2006
– 95 % union ( no bone graft/strut)– Long plate for proximal screw fixation – +/- cerclage wires – Their technique = Haddad 2002 results
used strut allograft or strut & plate
• MIPPO B1 #– Indirect ORIF 1 lateral plate no bone graft
~12/52 86% union 100% (Abhaykumar 2000, Ricci 2005)
Adjuvant bone graft not always necessary (Ricci 2007)
Old 2006 Old 2006 RxRx
PlatesPlatesb- Locking platesb- Locking plates• Stiffer than Ogden, & fail by lat cortex fracture (Fulkerson 2006)
• Conventional outermost screw reduces stress riser & significantly increased strength (Bottlang 2009)
• 90:90 construct (plate or strut) (Talbot 2008)
– Stiffer than 1 plate– Locking screws give no mechanical advantage over conventional
screws– No cable loosening after 100,000 cycles
PlatesPlatesb- Locking platesb- Locking plates• C# & B1#
– 100% union • LCP
• MIPPO
– 90% union • LCP
• LISS technique difficult but fewer complications than traditional fixation
– BetterBetter results IF combined with struts
PlatesPlatesc- Cable platesc- Cable plates• B1 #
– 100% union 4/12– 85% union– 57% union, cabled Dall Miles – ‘consider strut or long stem’ – 40% successful union, ‘avoid in varus stem’
• Avoid if retaining a stem in varus
• Threaded pin cerclage better than cerclage plate wrap
Sit in screw head
PlatesPlatesScrew anglesScrew angles• DCP DCP
– Offset hole 4mm on broad BUT not narrow plateOffset hole 4mm on broad BUT not narrow plate– 25250 0 & 7& 70 0 screw anglescrew angle
D d
PlatesPlatesScrew anglesScrew angles• DCP DCP
– Offset hole 4mm on broad BUT not narrow plateOffset hole 4mm on broad BUT not narrow plate– 252500 && 7 700 screw anglescrew angle
• LC-DCP LC-DCP – 80800 0 & 14& 140 0 screw angle, 4mm offsetscrew angle, 4mm offset
D
PlatesPlatesScrew anglesScrew angles• DCP DCP
– Offset hole 4mm on broad BUT not narrow plateOffset hole 4mm on broad BUT not narrow plate– 252500 & & 7700 screw anglescrew angle
• LC-DCP LC-DCP – 808000 & & 141400 screw angle, 4mm offsetscrew angle, 4mm offset
• Locking CPLocking CP– 505000 (<DCP) and 14 (<DCP) and 1400 non locked screw angle non locked screw angle– 4mm offset4mm offset
PlatesPlatesScrew anglesScrew angles• DCP DCP
– Offset hole 4mm on broad BUT not narrow plateOffset hole 4mm on broad BUT not narrow plate– 252500 & & 7700 screw anglescrew angle
• LC-DCP LC-DCP – 808000 & & 141400 screw angle, 4mm offsetscrew angle, 4mm offset
• Locking CPLocking CP– 505000 (<DCP) and (<DCP) and 141400 non locked screw angle, 4mm non locked screw angle, 4mm
offsetoffset
• Kinamed Supercable– 57570 0 & 16& 160 0 nonnon locked screw angle, 4mm offsetlocked screw angle, 4mm offset– Curved plates (match femur)Curved plates (match femur)
160
570
D+
PlatesPlates
• MennenMennen
PlatesPlates
• MennenMennen– Ahuja 2002 75% complication rateAhuja 2002 75% complication rate
– Noorda 2002 Noorda 2002 mechanical failure 31% and non-union mechanical failure 31% and non-union
28%28%
Onlay Allograft Onlay Allograft
Onlay Allograft Onlay Allograft
• Current indications
– Restore bone loss• Uncontained non-circumferential defects
– As a ‘Plate’ • Reinforce bone loss areas & bypass stress
risers
• Fix periprosthetic fractures
• Stabilize bulk allograft : host junctions
Onlay AllograftOnlay AllograftTechniqueTechnique• 1st description
– Penenberg & Chandler 1989
• Chandler 1998– Struts ½ diameter of shaft – Med & lat placement, contour to fit shaft– To avoid stress riser plate/allograft should be
staggered & bypass # by 2 diameters– Avoid linea aspera to protect blood supply– Keep periosteum for blood supply – Cables x 6 minimum
• Bradey 1999– 1/3 diameter @ 90:90 anterior & lat
• Preserves b.s from linea aspera & reduced stripping
Onlay AllograftOnlay AllograftBiology of unionBiology of union• Bone resorption
– Variable rounding off & scalloping by 6 months
• Bridging – Partial at 8/12 , completed by 1 yr
• Partial revascularisation– 20% by 5 years– Diffuse loss of radiodensity & changed trabecular pattern
• Remodelling – Of the graft & host femur
Onlay AllograftOnlay AllograftBiology of unionBiology of union• Union rate
– Improves if rigid fixation – 11-20% fail -infection, rejection, fracture, non union
• Union speed/quality– Auto graft - better quality union but not faster – Osteogenic protein 1 - faster healing & better quality – BMP2 - faster healing & better quality
• Immune response – Reduces osteoinduction – Freezing reduces antigenicity
Onlay AllograftOnlay AllograftBio-mechanicsBio-mechanics• Bone strength
– Freezing > freezing & irradiation > freeze drying– Dead bone > repaired bone (resorption)………– Allograft fractures increase around 2-4 years
• Stress shielding in vitro – Plate > strut
Onlay AllograftOnlay AllograftResultsResults• Plate & strut better than strut alone
– 90 - 95% union, strut alone
– 95% union, 1 plate 1 strut
– 98% union, struts +/- plate
My Recommendations:-
My Recommendations:-
• Wire– Temporary use – thickness & knot type is unimportant– Definitive use – if run out of cables simple B1 or C# (with great caution)
My Recommendations:-
• Wire– Temporary use – thickness & knot type is unimportant– Definitive use – if run out of cables simple B1 or C# (with great caution)
• Cables– MUCH better than wire, but best used with plates– Nylon cables have some theoretical advantages in more complex # pattern
• movement compensation; but costs more
My Recommendations:-
• Wire– Temporary use – thickness & knot type is unimportant– Definitive use – if run out of cables simple B1 or C# (with great caution)
• Cables– MUCH better than wire, but best used with plates– Nylon cables have some theoretical advantages in more complex # pattern
• movement compensation; but costs more
• Plates– Cabled plates good enough – Broad plates with all screws (offset screw holes) are better– Locked plates best – MIPPO difficult but results worth the effort
My Recommendations:-
• Wire– Temporary use – thickness & knot type is unimportant– Definitive use – if run out of cables simple B1 or C# (with great caution)
• Cables– MUCH better than wire, but best used with plates– Nylon cables have some theoretical advantages in more complex # pattern
• movement compensation; but costs more
• Plates– Cabled plates good enough – Broad plates with all screws (offset screw holes) are better– Locked plates best – MIPPO difficult but results worth the effort
• Strut graft– Almost as good as locked plates clinically
My Recommendations:-
• Wire– Temporary use – thickness & knot type is unimportant– Definitive use – if run out of cables simple B1 or C# (with great caution)
• Cables– MUCH better than wire, but best used with plates– Nylon cables have some theoretical advantages in more complex # pattern
• movement compensation; but costs more
• Plates– Cabled plates good enough – Broad plates with all screws (offset screw holes) are better– Locked plates best – MIPPO difficult but results worth the effort
• Strut graft– Almost as good as locked plates clinically
90:90 configuration,
although stronger bio-mechanically, clinically probably
not necessary.
Thank YouThank You