23
By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL RESOURCES LAW An Outline of Federal Law (with some thoughts on biodiversity)

By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Overview of 3 Major Federal Statutes that apply to Cultural Resources & Historic Properties Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) Native American Graves Protection & Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) Both ARPA & NAGPRA establish permit reqs. NHPA establishes a review & consultation req.

Citation preview

Page 1: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

By: Dean SuageeDirector

First Nations Environmental Law Program

Vermont Law School

PROTECTING SACRED LANDSAND

TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES

WITH CULTURAL RESOURCES LAW

An Outline of Federal Law(with some thoughts on

biodiversity)

Page 2: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

THE FIRST AMENDMENT DOES NOT APPLY

• Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association, 485 U.S. 439 (1988)

Except maybe to justify “accommodation” through “voluntary” actions and avoid an Establishment Clause challenge -- Bear Lodge Multiple Use Ass’n v. Babbitt

Page 3: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

• Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)

Overview of 3 Major Federal Statutes that apply to

Cultural Resources & Historic Properties

• Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA)• Native American Graves Protection & Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)Both ARPA & NAGPRA establish permit reqs.

NHPA establishes a review & consultation req.

Page 4: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT (NHPA)

Entities with Roles in the Program:•National Park Service (NPS)

•Advisory Council on Historic Preservation

•All Federal Agencies•State Historic Pres. Officers (SHPOs)

•Indian tribes•Native Hawaiian organizations (NHOs)

Page 5: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

National Register of Historic Places

• NHPA--protects places that are listed or eligible for listing on the National Register

Criteria for EligibilityAssociated w/Significant EventsAssociated w/the Lives of Significant PersonsDistinctive Characteristics

Yielded, or Likely to Yield, information Important in prehistory or history

Page 6: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

Traditional Cultural Properties (TCPs):

• Indian “sacred sites” as that term is used in an Executive Order 13007

(issued in 1996) may be TCPs.

A Property is Eligible for the National Register B/C•Association w/Cultural Practices/Beliefs

of a Living Community that are:1. Rooted in that Community’s History, &

2. Important in Maintaining the Continuing Cultural Identity of Community

Page 7: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

Roles & Rights of Tribes•Lands within Tribal Territorial Jurisdiction •A tribe can assume any or all of SHPO

roles for “Tribal Lands”– All lands w/in the exterior boundaries of any

Indian Reservation&

– All dependent Indian Communities

Page 8: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

---A right to be consulted in the section 106 process when an undertaking would affect a historic place with religious & cultural significance.---

Lands Beyond Tribal Jurisdiction

Page 9: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

Requirements for Outcomes of the Section 106 Process• Typically concluded by a Memo of

Agreement•No Agreement:– Agency decision to proceed w/undertaking must

be made by the head of the agency--such a decision cannot be delegated

•National Historic Landmarks--must minimize harm

•Transportation funding--only if no prudent & feasible alternative

Page 10: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

WWW.achp.gov/regsflow.html

Page 11: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

South Lawrence Trafficway, Kansas

Page 12: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

Proposed Imperial Mine, California

Page 13: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

13

Confidentiality• Information on traditional cultural

properties tends to be sensitive• Information can be limited to need

for determination of eligibility• Information may be withheld from

disclosure -- section 304• Agency may choose not to seek

eligibility determination, and protect by alternative means

Page 14: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

Penalties under ARPA• Criminal -- If commercial or “archaeological

value” and the cost of restoration and repair less than $500, a misdemeanor carrying up to 1 year incarceration and a $100,000 fine

• If over $500, a felony carrying up to 2 years incarceration and a $250,000 fine

• Civil penalties • Civil forfeiture of equipment, vehicles, and

tools used in the attempted or actual taking of protected archaeological resources

Page 15: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

15

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act(NAGPRA)

Places and Things Covered 1. Human Remains 2. “Cultural Items” 3. Federal Lands 4. “Tribal Lands”

Page 16: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

NAGPRA (cont.)• Repatriation -- human remains and cultural

items (funerary objects, sacred objects, and objects of cultural patrimony) currently held or controlled by federal agencies and “museums”

• Graves Protection -- human remains and cultural items embedded in federal and “tribal lands”

• Rights of “ownership or control” of items excavated or removed from federal or tribal lands after the enactment (November 1990)

Page 17: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

NAGPRA (cont.)Protection of Graves and Imbedded

Cultural Items 1. Intentional Excavations

(a) Federal Lands(b) Tribal Lands

2. Discovery Situations Disposition of Human Remains and

Cultural ItemsEnforcement

1. Federal Enforcement 2. Private Actions in Federal Court

Page 18: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

18

Embedded Remains and Cultural Items on Federal and Tribal

Lands• Intentional Excavations

– ARPA Permit– Tribal notice and consultation on federal

lands; development of action plans– Tribal notice and consent on tribal lands;

must have proof of consultation or consent• Inadvertent discoveries

– Notice and consultation– 30 day cessation of activities– Reasonable effort to protect the items

discovered

Page 19: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

BIODIVERSITY AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PROPERTIES:

IN SEARCH OF SYNERGY AND A PARADIGM SHIFT

• Preserving Biodiversity in an Age of Mass Extinction

– Thesis: The policies underlying the Endangered Species Act and the efforts of Indian tribes and their members to carry on traditional cultural practices that make use of animals and plants do share some common ground, at least in theory. Can we find common ground in practice?

Page 20: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

Critiques of the ESA

•Single Species Approach Is Too Narrow

•The Act Applies Too Late

•Threshold Set Too Low – Survival Rather than

Recovery

•Penalizes Landowners Who Have Left Land

Undisturbed

Page 21: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

Traditional Cultural Places and Biodiversity

•Some Scenarios

– Tribal cultural practices make use of the endangered or threatened species

»(1) Listed species is an animal

»(2) Listed species is a plant

– Tribal cultural practices make use of species that live in community with listed species

Page 22: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

Five Principles

•Assistance to Tribes for tribal programs to promote healthy

ecosystems and avoid need for conservation restrictions,

which shall only be imposed if five standards are met:

– reasonable and necessary for conservation of species;

– conservation purpose cannot be achieved by regulation of non-Indians;

– least restrictive alternative;

– no discrimination against Indian activities; and

– voluntary tribal measures are not adequate.

Page 23: By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL

Administration of the ESA – the Appendix to

the Secretarial Order

•Recovery

– (1) Solicit tribal participation if species occurs on Indian lands, affects trust resources, or affects exercise of tribal rights.

– (2) Cooperate with tribes to minimize social, cultural and economic impacts.

– (3) What if recovery plan affects a TCP?