Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
qi.elft.nhs.uk
@ELFT_QI
Building an improvement
system and movement
@DrAmarShah
Mental health servicesNewham, Tower Hamlets, City & Hackney, Luton & Bedfordshire
Forensic servicesAll above & Waltham Forest, Redbridge, Barking, Dagenham, Havering
Child & Adolescent services, including tier 4 inpatient service
Regional Mother & Baby unit
Community health services Newham & Tower Hamlets
IAPTNewham, Richmond and Luton
Speech & LanguageBarnet
Challenges and
opportunities
Cultural diversity
Social deprivation
Geographical diversity
Commissioningarrangements
Financial stability and
strong assurance systems
@ELFT_QI
QualityBetter
Reject defectives
Requirement,Specification or Threshold
No action taken here
Worse
The old way (Quality Assurance)
Performing well?
The strategic case for change
Make quality our absolute priority
• Improving quality of care is our core purpose
• Of greatest importance to all our stakeholders
• Build on the excellent work already happening to improve quality
National drivers
• The need to focus on a more compassionate, caring service with patients first and foremost
• More structured and bottom-up approach to improvement
Enable our staff to lead change
• The desire to engage, free and support our staff to innovate and drive change
• Engaged and motivated staff leads to improved patient outcomes
The economic climate
• The need to do more with less
– improving quality whilst reducing cost
@ELFT_QI
First, let’s define what we mean by…
Quality improvement
improvingquality
quality improvement
=
© 2016 Institute for Healthcare Improvement/R. Lloyd
Priorities, structures (e.g. Quality Directorate), data systems, learning
system, sense making, strategic deployment, building capability
Leadership and Management
Components of quality
Quality
ImprovementMotivation/Leadership
Efficient Systems
Reflective Data
Context-sensitive
learning
• Internal monitoring –
continuous measurement
• External Inspection –
intermittent inspection
• Internal and external
regulations
Quality Control IMPROVED
OUTCOMES
New Designs, re-designs
Innovations, new tools in response
to customer needs and experience
Quality Planning
© 2016 Institute for Healthcare Improvement/R. Lloyd
Three Dimensions of Quality
Quality
Improvement
Control
Assurance
QualityBetter
Old Way
(Quality Assurance)
QualityBetter Worse
New Way
(Quality Improvement)
Action taken on
all occurrences
Reject
defectives
Quality assurance versus Quality improvement
Source: Robert Lloyd, Ph.D.
Requirement,
Specification or Target
No action
taken
here
Worse
QI: in a
nutshell!
(large)
Research & innovation
Quality improvement
Assurance, control &
performance management
@ELFT_QI
Trust board bespoke learning sessions
Visits to other organisationsSentinel event
Developing the strategy through engagement
Building the case for change
Early small scale tests
Long-term business case approved
Assess readiness for change
Identify strategic partner
Change in Executive
behaviours
Executive WalkRounds
Use of data to guide decision-making
Stop solving problems at the top
Give people time and space to solve complex problems
Manage the expectationsPaying
personal attention
A force-field analysis helps identify the forces driving and resisting a change.
Try to identify:a) The things that are currently supporting or driving
your organisation to become more improvement-focused
b) The things that are resisting this shiftc) The actions you could take to either strengthen driving
forces or negate restraining forces
Building the case for change
Table Exercise – force-field analysis
Force Field Analysis
Driving Forces (+) Restraining Forces (-)
Actions to reduce the Restraining Forces:
•
•
•
Actions to strengthen the Driving Forces:
•
•
•
Designing a quality
improvement programme
Make it feel meaningful
Make it feel possible
Make it feel valued and permanent
Provide skills and support
AIM:
To support ELFT to improve
health and healthcare
for the population
it serves
Engaging, encouraging &
inspiring
Developing improvement
skills
Embedding into daily
work
Projects
1. Targeting / segmenting comms for different groups (community-based staff, Bedfordshire & Luton staff)
2. Sharing stories – newsletters, microsite, presenting internally3. Celebration – awards, conferences, publications, internal
presentations4. Share externally – social media, Open mornings, visits, microsite5. Work upstream – trainees, regional partners, key national and
international influencers
1. Pocket QI for anyone interested, extended to Beds & Luton2. Refresher training for all ISIA graduates3. Improvement Science in Action waves4. Online learning options5. Develop cohort and pipeline of improvement coaches6. Leadership and scale-up workshops for sponsors7. Bespoke learning, including Board sessions & commissioners
1. Learning system: QI Life, quality dashboards, microsite2. Standard work as part of a holistic quality system3. Job descriptions, recruitment process, appraisal process4. Annual cycle of improvement: planning, prioritising, design and
resourcing projects5. Support staff to find time and space to improve things6. Support deeper service user and carer involvement
Directorate-level priorities- Defined through annual cycle of planning- Most local projects aligned to directorate priorities
Trust-wide strategic priorities1. Reduce harm from inpatient violence2. Improving access to community services3. Joy in work4. Recovery-focused community mental health5. Cost reduction
AIM:
To support ELFT to improve
health and healthcare
for the population
it serves
Engaging, encouraging
and inspiring
QI Stories at Trust Board
QI Visibility Wall
Electronic & paper newsletters
qi.elft.nhs.uk
Visits to see QI at ELFT
Influencing national policy and thinking
Staff experience and engagement
3,5
3,6
3,7
3,8
3,9
4
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sco
re
Overall Engagement Score
ELFT Score
National Median
3,5
3,6
3,7
3,8
3,9
4
4,1
4,2
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sco
re
Staff Motivation to Work
3,3
3,4
3,5
3,6
3,7
3,8
3,9
4
4,1
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sco
re
Staff job satisfaction
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sco
re (
%)
Staff able to contribute towards improvements at work
Bu
ildin
g w
ill
Build a broad coalition for
change
Take time to bring people
with you
Shift decision-making to the
edge
Develop a compelling narrative
Find some clear signals
of change
Use the power of stories
Take every opportunity to
celebrate
Building the willTable exercise
Consider what you might try to engage people (staff, patients, stakeholders) with QI.
AIM:
To support ELFT to improve
health and healthcare
for the population
it serves
Developing improvement
skills
Experts by experience
All staff
Staff involved in or leading QI projects
Sponsors
Board
Estimated number needed to train = 4000Needs = introduction to QI & systems thinking,
identifying problems, how to get involved
Estimated number needed to train = 1000Needs = Model for improvement, PDSA,
measurement and using data, leading teams
Estimated number needed = 50Needs = deep understanding of method & tools,
understanding variation, coaching teams
Needs = setting direction and big goals, executive leadership, oversight of improvement,
understanding variation
Estimated number needed to train = 10Needs = deep statistical process control, deep
improvement methods, effective plans for implementation & spread
363 completed Pocket QI so far. All staff receive intro to QI at
induction
690 graduated from ISIA in 6 waves. Wave 7 in 2017-18.
Refresher training for ISIA grads.
47 QI coaches trained so far, with 35 currently active. Third cohort of
20 to be trained in 2017
All Executives have completed ISIA. Annual Board session with IHI &
regular Board development
Currently have 6 improvement advisors, with 3 further QI leads in
training
Internal experts (QI
leads)
Bespoke QI learning sessions for service users and carers. Over 95
attended so far. Build into recovery college syllabus
Needs = introduction to QI, how to get involved in improving a service, practical skills in
confidence-building, presentation, contributing ideas
QI coaches
Needs = Model for improvement, PDSA, measurement & variation, scale-up and spread,
leadership for improvement
58 current sponsors. All completed ISIA. Leadership, scale-up & refresher QI training in 2017
Psychology trainees – Pocket QI, embedded into QI project teams with 4 bespoke learning sessions
Nursing students – Intro to QI delivered within undergraduate and postgrad syllabus, embedded into QI project teams during student placements
Wo
rkin
gu
pst
ream
QI capability building
• In-depth training• Course length is 6 months.
• 3days intensive training; 4 WebEx teleconferences; 2 full day learning sets
• Applying learning to their QI projects in ‘action periods’
• Flexible, online training resource available to the whole Trust.
• Essential skills to support in leading
QI• Certificate which
can be added to CPD portfolio.
• Apps for phone or tablet, or use browser
• Brand new modular
introduction to QI
• For anyone involved in
QI or wanting to learn
core QI skills
• Overview to using QI,
PDSAs and testing,
Using measurement &
data for improvement,
QI Tools
• One-stop shop
• Learning
resources
• Seminal papers,
guidelines,
whitepapers
• Videos
• QI tools
PreworkWorkshop
9/29-10/1
Webex 1
10/14
Webex 2
11/2
Supports:
• Listserve
• Assignments
AP-1 AP-2Webex 3
11/30AP-3
Project
PlanningReliability
Sustaining
Gains
Workshop
(3 days)
Webex #2Webex #1
• Faculty consults• Webex calls• Coaching calls
Webex #3 Learning Set 2 &
graduation
AP-5AP-4
The two learning sets will be focused on sharing the participants’ work on their projects and learning from each
other. These sessions also will reinforce the content from the Webex calls and the ISIA workshop.
Improvement Science in Action - 6 month learning path
Learning set 1
Workshop 1
Overview to using QI
Workshop 3
PDSAs and testing
Workshop 4
QI Tools
All 4 workshops are between 2-3 hours in a classroom format and rotate in location throughout the
geography of the Trust.
Workshop 2Using
measurement for improvement
Pocket QI- 2 month learning path
QI Coaches
Intro to QI - for service users & carers
Bu
ildin
g ca
pab
ility
&
cap
acit
y
Be prepared to invest
Train all levels and across disciplines
Realign existing
resources
Stop lower value work
1. What capacity do you need to get going? How can you release this?
2. What existing capability do you have? How could you shuffle existing resources to bring this together into a single quality improvement team?
3. How would you build a business case and convince your leadership team about the need to invest in building capability and capacity for improvement?
Building Capability
Table Discussion
AIM:
To support ELFT to improve
health and healthcare
for the population
it serves
Embedding into daily
work
AIM:
To support ELFT to improve
health and healthcare
for the population
it serves
QI ResourcesService User Input
Support around every team
Project Sponsor QI Coach
QI Forums
QI Team
Governance Improvement
Little i Big I
Surveys
Focus groups
Community meetings
Service user
forum
Changing the way we use data to guide decision-making
Safety trust wide excluding Beds and Luton(London)
Clinical Effectivenesstrust wide excluding Beds and Luton
Patient Experiencetrust wide excluding Beds and Luton
Complaints June and July 2016.
Our Stafftrust wide excluding Beds and Luton
Reasons given by staff leaving June to July 2016
Changing the way we look at data
Data at Trust, directorate or team level
Alig
nm
ent
& in
tegr
atio
n
Start at the topCreate a support
structure
Build a learning system
Ensure patients and carers are
integral
Ensure the context is ripe
Line of sight from team to system goals
1. What will you need to redesign in order to align your organisation around systematic continuous improvement?
2. What can you change, stop or review to create space for improvement?
3. What structures and processes will you need to support quality improvement work?
Alignment
Table Discussion
AIM:
To support ELFT to improve
health and healthcare
for the population
it serves
Projects
Make it feel meaningful
Make it feel possible
Make it feel valued and permanent
Provide skills and support
Our QI Projects
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
sep.14 okt.14 nov.14 des.14 jan.15 feb.15 mar.15 apr.15 mai.15 jun.15 jul.15 aug.15 sep.15 okt.15 nov.15 des.15 jan.16 feb.16
No
. of
ne
w p
roje
cts
No. of active projects per month
155Active
Projects
REDUCE HARM BY 30% EVERY YEAR
9
PHYSICAL HEALTH
ACCESS TO SERVICES
PRESSURE ULCERS
VIOLENCE REDUCTION
3 19 18
26
RIGHT CARE, RIGHT PLACE, RIGHT TIME
129
Our QI Projects47 projects have shown sustained improvement
Our QI Projects
1 2 1 23
6
1
5 6
2 2 1 2
7
5
1
11
42 3
3
1
2
4
13
5
1
52
1
3
4
46
3
1
34
72
1
1
1
1
8
2
2
2 1
1
2
1
1
2 1
1
2
1
2
7
3
4
2
Closed, Successfully Completed 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5
Violence reduction
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
2013 2014 2015
No
. of
Inci
den
ts
Physical violence to patients (per 100,000 occupied bed days)
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2013 2014 2015
Physical violence to staff (per 100,000 occupied bed days)
Over three years, physical violence has reduced compared to other mental health
providers
Impact across all 35 East London wards =
25% reduction
60% reduction in violence across three older adult wards with highest
level of violence
40% reduction across all six wards in Tower Hamlets
50% reduction in Forensic learning disability service
UCL
67,79
51,13LCL
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
06-
Jan
-14
03-
Feb
-14
03-
Mar
-14
31-
Mar
-14
28-
Ap
r-14
26-
May
-14
23-
Jun
-14
21-
Jul-
14
18-
Au
g-14
15-
Sep
-14
13-
Oct
-14
10-
No
v-14
08-
Dec
-14
05-
Jan
-15
02-
Feb
-15
02-
Mar
-15
30-
Mar
-15
27-
Ap
r-15
25-
May
-15
22-
Jun
-15
20-
Jul-
15
17-
Au
g-15
14-
Sep
-15
12-
Oct
-15
09-
No
v-15
07-
Dec
-15
04-
Jan
-16
01-
Feb
-16
29-
Feb
-16
28-
Mar
-16
25-
Ap
r-16
23-
May
-16
20-
Jun
-16
No
. of
Inci
de
nts
Incidents resulting in physical violence (Trust-wide, excluding Luton and Beds) - C Chart
Improving access to services
32,21%
25,23%
26,30%
UCL
LCL
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Jan
-14
Feb
-14
Mar
-14
Ap
r-14
May
-14
Jun
-14
Jul-
14
Au
g-14
Sep
-14
Oct
-14
No
v-14
Dec
-14
Jan
-15
Feb
-15
Mar
-15
Ap
r-15
May
-15
Jun
-15
Jul-
15
Au
g-15
Sep
-15
Oct
-15
No
v-15
Dec
-15
Jan
-16
Feb
-16
Mar
-16
Ap
r-16
May
-16
Jun
-16
Jul-
16
Au
g-16
Sep
-16
DN
A /
%
% of 1st face to face appts DNAs (Collaborative, 10/12 teams) - P Chart
UCL
1 021,711 213,13
1 331,17
LCL700
900
1100
1300
1500
1700
jan
.14
feb
.14
mar
.14
apr.
14
mai
.14
jun
.14
jul.1
4
aug.
14
sep
.14
okt
.14
no
v.1
4
des
.14
jan
.15
feb
.15
mar
.15
apr.
15
mai
.15
jun
.15
jul.1
5
aug.
15
sep
.15
okt
.15
no
v.1
5
des
.15
jan
.16
feb
.16
mar
.16
apr.
16
mai
.16
jun
.16
jul.1
6
aug.
16
sep
.16
No
. of
Re
ferr
als
No. of referrals received (Collaborative, 10/12 teams) - I Chart
30% increase in referrals across 10 community services
20% reduction in non-attendance at first appointment across 10 community services
50% reduction in waiting time from referral to first
appointment across City & Hackney community mental
health teams
60,77
40,05
UCL
LCL
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Ja
n-1
4
Feb
-14
Mar-
14
Apr-
14
May-1
4
Ju
n-1
4
Ju
l-14
Aug
-14
Sep
-14
Oct-
14
No
v-1
4
De
c-1
4
Ja
n-1
5
Feb
-15
Mar-
15
Apr-
15
May-1
5
Ju
n-1
5
Ju
l-15
Aug
-15
Sep
-15
Oct-
15
No
v-1
5
De
c-1
5
Ja
n-1
6
Feb
-16
Mar-
16
Apr-
16
May-1
6
Ju
n-1
6
Ju
l-16
Aug
-16
Sep
-16
Avera
ge W
ait
ing
Tim
e /
Days
Average waiting time from referral to 1st face to face appt (City and Hackney CMHTs) - X-bar Chart
@ELFT_QIqi.elft.nhs.uk [email protected]