AUTOLOGOUS (pre-operative), DIRECTED & DESIGNATED

DONATIONSBlood Centre Perspective

Transfusion Medicine Resident Topic TeachingOctober 11, 2011

D.K. Towns, MD, FRCPC (Anesthesia)Medical Director - CalgaryCanadian Blood Servicesdale.towns@blood.ca

2

Autologous DonationAutologous donor: an individual who donates blood for the purpose of transfusion back to him/herself at a later time. At Canadian Blood Services, autologous donors must meet Donor Selection Acceptance Criteria, modified from the Whole Blood Programme for allogeneic donors.

• This is most commonly requested in preparation for upcoming, scheduled elective surgery

• Consent is required

• No age limits

• Must be requested by a physician (usually the surgeon, or, the family physician)

• If outside of CBS criteria, may consider collection at the hospital

3

Autologous Donation (con’t)• Minimum weight of 55 lb

- If less than 110 lb, a formula-driven reduced collection is performed

• Minimum hemoglobin/hematocrit at first donation: 110 g/l/.33- Subsequent donations: 105/.32

• Red cell shelf life is 42 days- Therefore, usually a maximum of 4 units, 1 week apart, and no more than 72 hours prior to surgery

• Consider oral iron replacement- ?erythropoietin

• Collected in CPD with added SAGM- Red blood cells and plasma produced- Plasma discarded unless specifically requested - then issued as FP

• Whole blood no longer available

4

Indications

• Consider only if the chance of requiring a transfusion is > 10%

• How many and when to collect?

• The same number as would be ordered for an allogeneic crossmatch using M-BOS (or a case-by-case assessment)

• Common surgical indications:– major vascular surgery, including cardiac– radical prostatectomy– major orthopedic, including hip and knee (particularly re-do), scoliosis– liver resection– “at risk” obstetrics

5

• Many Canadian hospitals have autologous donation programs

• Patients deemed high risk at Canadian Blood Services may be considered for in-hospital donation

• PAD programs are available at most Canadian Blood Services permanent donor clinics

6

Acceptance criteria differs from allogeneic donation (hemoglobin, hematocrit, collection intervals)

– The donor questionnaire is significantly abbreviated, focusing primarily on risks of the donation process to the donor or risks of bacterial contamination

Other areas differing from allogeneic donation:• Can donate if:

– received blood/blood products recently– cancer– some cardiac conditions– recent invasive procedures (example, tattoos, piercings)– medication use (which does not increase risk to the donation

process)– pregnancy– syphilis positive

7

Contraindications• Evidence of infection/risk of bacteremia• IHSS (idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis)• Aortic stenosis• Left main coronary artery disease• Unstable angina• Cardiac failure• MI in previous 6 weeks• A-V block• Uncontrolled hypertension• Cyanotic heart disease• Active seizure disorder

8

• Each unit in every series is tested for the same infectious disease markers as for allogeneic donations

• TD positive units (except for syphilis) must be discarded

• TD markers repeat reactive for infectious diseases but confirmatory negative or indeterminate can be released but have a biohazard label

• Anti-HBcore positive units with or without a positive anti-HBs can be similarly released

Note: Hospital-collected autologous units "should be" tested for transmissible diseases, but if positive - do not have to be discarded; a policy shall simply be in place as to how to

deal with them

9

Advantages• Major impetus - particularly in the past - was patient and physician

desire to eliminate the risk of transfusion-transmitted viral diseases (particularly HIV and Hepatitis)

• Autologous transfusion minimizes exposure to allogeneic red cells and leukocyte antigens which could lead to future transfusion compatibility difficulties

• There is some evidence that allogeneic transfusion can lead to modulation of the recipients immune system

• Autologous donation theoretically can enhance the available allogeneic supply

• Provides compatible blood for patients with alloantibodies/rare blood

• Decreases risk of some adverse transfusion reactions (febrile reactions, TRALI reactions, allergic reactions, delayed hemolytic reactions)

10

Disadvantages• Higher costs

– Logistic issues- The blood must be at the right place in the right condition at the right

time - Must be specially labelled - Must be a system in place at both the hospital and blood centre - The hospital blood bank must know the blood is available, and

how many units are available, so that autologous blood is used before allogeneic

• High wastage (approximately 50%)

• Surgical delay may result in outdating and discard of units

• Units cannot be crossed over into the allogeneic pool (differing acceptance criteria)

• Subjects patients to perioperative anemia, in general.

11

Risks which are NOT decreased• Bacterial contamination

• Risk of driving to and from donation

• Clerical error leading to wrong unit being transfused (1:50,000)

• Receiving allogeneic blood before, or instead of autologous blood

• Autologous donors have approximately 12x higher risk of reaction than allogeneic donors at the time of donation. (Usually in young patients, underweight, previous reaction, or first time donation.)

**Never transfuse autologous blood simply because it’s there

12

Autologous Donations 1999 to 2010, Canadian Blood Services

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

Nu

mb

er o

f A

uto

log

ou

s D

on

atio

ns

1999 375 182 108 82 1,977 396 16 75 2,678 50 103 240 1,396 321

2000 783 292 304 156 3,475 1,266 29 112 2,478 72 188 261 1,988 633

2001 556 283 308 87 3,159 1,402 27 55 1,998 65 173 198 1,677 579

2002 523 198 161 89 2,904 1,298 28 44 1,529 55 171 182 1,453 391

2003 389 630 178 53 2,520 1,082 30 50 1,442 0 236 175 1,520 470

2004 457 844 133 90 2,090 1,005 13 55 1,193 0 200 79 1,459 247

2005 297 599 92 67 1,706 805 24 29 1,112 0 231 82 1,498 237

2006 115 388 57 57 1,669 813 16 23 923 0 236 52 1,356 173

2007 62 340 81 49 1,322 599 28 19 702 0 201 45 916 167

2008 50 135 48 43 842 527 14 6 406 0 139 30 706 110

2009 60 85 24 10 535 437 11 13 268 0 158 26 549 61

2010 18 44 37 14 344 399 17 9 230 0 128 17 407 63

BC AND

YUKONCALGARY EDMONTON HALIFAX HAMILTON LONDON

NEW

BRUNSWICK

NEWFOUNDLA

ND AND

LABRADOR

OTTAWA REGINASASKATCHE

WANSUDBURY TORONTO WINNIPEG

13

Autologous Donations by Fiscal Period

11,10411,505

10,224

8,9338,497

7,589

6,456

5,566

4,155

2,831

2,140

1,500

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11

Nu

me

br

of

Do

na

tio

ns

14

Krever Recommendations – Interim ReportUsing The Patient’s Own Blood (articles 18-25)

18. The programs for autologous blood be made available throughout Canada to patients who are scheduled for elective surgery

22. That Departments of Public Health determine in which public hospitals it would be feasible to create autologous programs

23. That programs be ‘inclusive’

24. That hospitals, surgeons, physicians inform patients of the existence of autologous programs

25. That written information be provided well in advance of elective surgery

15

Krever Recommendations – Interim ReportRecommendations to the Blood Service

The blood service should:

19. Examine ways in which it can extend its PAD to a greater number of patients over a wider geographic area

20. Ensure that its PAD Program is available to patients about to undergo surgery outside their province of residence

21. Take active measures to publicize its PAD service

16

The Cochrane database of Systematic Reviews Volume 2, 2002• Pre-operative autologous donation reduced the risk of

receiving allogeneic blood transfusion by a relative 63% • The risk of receiving any blood transfusion was 43.8%.

Billote, et al. J Bone Joint Surg 2002• prospective randomized controlled trial:

– patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty - hemoglobin ≥ 120 g/L– half donated autologous blood, half did not– *pre-determined transfusion trigger was defined– neither received allogeneic blood– of the autologous donors, 69% received an autologous

transfusion– 41% of the autologous units were wasted

17

Vamvakas in 2002 and 2007 (Vox Sang)

• critical reappraisal of clinical trials on the immunomodulatory effect of allogeneic blood transfusion

• did not unequivocally identify an association between allogeneic erythrocyte concentrate transfusion and postoperative infection, or short term mortality

18

Utilization

• CBS data• Calgary-specific data• Gail Rock (Transfusion Medicine, 2006; A

review of nearly two decades in an autologous blood programme...)

• other ...

• All show < 50% utilization rates of autologous blood

19

• Guidelines for policies on alternatives to allogeneic blood transfusion. 1. PAD and transfusion. Transfusion Medicine, 2007

• PAD not recommended unless the clinical circumstances are exceptional– rare blood groups– children with scoliosis– patients at serious psychiatric risk– patients who refuse to consent to allogeneic

transfusion

20

Caspari - letter to the editor (Transfusion Medicine 2007)

• autologous donation may be indicated for patients with rare blood groups and/or blood group antibodies

• for patients in highly developed countries - where safety and supply is not an issue– it is difficult to demonstrate a net benefit of autologous over

allogeneic blood transfusion

21

Case Study #1

• 63 year old female undergoing bilateral mandibular osteotomy

• family physician takes responsibility for ordering 2 units RBC

• donation takes place at CBS• negative past history• first unit anti-HCV positive• *surgeon cancels surgery altogether

22

Case Study #2

• 45 year old male undergoing total hip arthroplasty• 2 units RBC ordered• 1st unit anti-HIV positive

a) donation takes place at CBS- what do you do with the unit?

b) donation takes place at hospital... and now?

• what are the issues?

23

Dedicated Donations:

1) Directed Donations• an allogeneic donation where the patient who requires a

blood transfusion selects an individual or individuals (usually friends or relatives) to provide the necessary blood products (usually RBCs). For patients who are not yet of legal age, the selection of the donor(s) is done by the parents.

2) Designated• donations selected from a specific donor for a specific

recipient, for medically indicated reasons.

24

25

• Directed Donations have been available in the U.S. (and Europe, Australia . . .) for many years

• Until 1996, not permitted by the CRCS - BTS (unless medically indicated, now termed "designated")

• In January 1996, Dr. Francine Décary convened an advisory group of experts:– concluded that DD should be made available but not

actively promoted

• At the same time, a court order obliged the CRCS in Montreal to provide DD to a child undergoing heart surgery from his two parents

26

• The CRCS program started soon after

• Héma-Québec - which now became the blood operator in Quebec, also started a DD program

• CRCS (and now CBS) provided DD from parent (biological or adoptive) to a minor aged child, as does CBS currently

• Héma-Québec's program is open to any compatible donor/recipient pair irrespective of recipient age or donor and recipient relationship

27

• Dr. Goldman's 1998 article in the CSTM Bulletin summarizes the first 2 years of Héma-Québec's experience:

– it was a small program

– the utilization rates were poor

– it decreased donor exposure in only 20% of recipients

28

CBS procedure:• The transfusing physician must fill out a requisition after determining

the selected donor's blood is compatible with the recipient.

• If CMV seronegativity is required, this must be determined and ensured by the physician prior to the request.

• The donor must fulfill the same criteria as an allogeneic donor (a few exceptions)

• Bled into a "B-2" pack (capability to make RBC and FP)– shelf life 42 days BUT will likely be irradiated, therefore 28 days

* Note, FP is only issued if specifically requested* Note also, RBC may be compatible but FP might not

• last donation must be at least 72 hours prior to transfusion

29

What about safety?

• possibility of graft vs. host disease (risk mitigated by appropriate gamma irradiation)

• transmissible disease risk:– Dr. Nadine Shehata analyzed CBS TD data:

• Directed Donors in Canada had slightly higher rates of positivity for Hepatitis B, C, and syphilis than regular allogeneic doors

30

Other risks:

• Same as allogeneic transfusion, but in addition:

– In newborn - maternal antibodies against paternally inherited antigens (therefore don't use plasma; TRALI risk reduction measures have since prevented maternal plasma transfusion)

– In newborn - father's red cells may be incompatible with maternally derived antibodies still present

– If any adverse event related to the blood transfusion were to occur - ? guilt/blame

31

Case Presentation #1

– 8 year old child undergoing craniotomy and tumor removal

– Mom is a family physician– Dad is selected as compatible RBC donor– 2 units requested– First unit successfully donated– 24 hours later, dad called with post donation

information . . .

• What are the issues?• What would you do with this unit?• What about the next planned donation?

32

Designated Donations:Some of the medically indicated reasons for designated donations include:

– patients with rare blood groups and antibodies– infants with NAIT or HDN– children with major blood loss surgery where designated donors may

decrease donor exposure– children with anticipated lifelong transfusion requirements (thalassemia,

sickle cell anemia)– patients with leukemia in relapse after bone marrow transplantation – (donor leukocytes are used as adoptive immunotherapy to induce graft

versus leukemia)– HLA – matched apheresis platelets

• Designated Donors may, or may not be known or selected by their recipient

• They may be selected by the Blood Centre

• Crossover is acceptable if the donor has met all criteria for allogeneic donation.

33

Case Presentation #2• 48 year old male post bone marrow transplant for CML

• Bone marrow donor is identical twin (therefore identical match) (*but has never donated blood)

• Post transplant:– patient bleeding, first mucosal and bladder, finally GI tract– platelet count 5– random platelet transfusions from hospital blood bank fail to

produce increment– Oncologist wants plateletpheresis product(s) from twin – Wants to transfuse “urgently" prior to completion of testing

• What are the issues to consider?

34

Directed Donations by Fiscal Period

983

1,076

800742

665 666

594553

447

381

305

209

0

500

1,000

1,500

1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11

Nu

me

br

of

Do

na

tio

ns

35

Directed Donations 1999 to 2010, Canadian Blood Services

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Nu

mb

er

of

Dir

ecte

d D

on

ati

on

s

1999 46 38 5 21 49 23 11 0 215 21 10 16 204 1

2000 97 62 16 26 181 62 13 6 218 35 17 22 386 10

2001 62 78 10 22 135 20 7 8 115 29 5 18 330 13

2002 28 62 21 28 67 13 15 4 140 15 14 15 347 17

2003 15 43 10 21 90 30 8 8 92 0 19 19 286 7

2004 26 30 13 25 141 49 8 8 103 0 16 19 265 23

2005 15 22 14 20 110 26 9 4 93 0 21 20 233 4

2006 10 34 7 24 58 27 10 0 123 0 39 7 203 0

2007 9 23 6 13 99 34 7 1 69 0 12 7 187 1

2008 6 28 0 6 69 21 4 1 96 0 6 12 185 0

2009 1 7 0 11 54 9 3 1 81 0 22 21 106 3

2010 4 9 2 1 26 3 4 3 63 0 17 8 72 1

BC AND

YUKONCALGARY EDMONTON HALIFAX HAMILTON LONDON

NEW

BRUNSWICK

NEWFOUNDLA

ND AND

LABRADOR

OTTAWA REGINASASKATCHE

WANSUDBURY TORONTO WINNIPEG