Upload
nguyenthuy
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AssessmentLiteracyandFormativeAssessment
ResourceDevelopmentTraining
PresentedbyMarzano Researchfor
WyomingDepartmentofEducationFall2017
Ms.JanK.Hoegh,[email protected]
2
Day#1LearningOutcomes:o Gainanawarenessoftheresearchregardingclassroomassessment.o Understandthedifferencesamongobtrusive,unobtrusive,and
student-generatedassessmentsandhowtouseeachintheclassroom.o Learnessentialpracticesforclassroomassessment:
1) Identifyprioritystandardsforinformingclassroomassessmentdevelopment.2) Provideclearunderstandingofstandards,learninggoals,andlearningtargets
throughproficiencyscaledevelopment.3) Provideinstructionthatfocusesontheprioritystandard.4) Providefrequentandmeaningfulfeedback.5) Provideopportunitiesforstudentstosetgoals,reflectonlearning,andtracktheir
ownprogress.
Day#2LearningOutcomes:o Learnaboutcommonassessmentdevelopmentanduseformonitoring
studentprogresstoessentialcontent.o Learnaboutdevelopinghigh-qualityperformanceassessments.o Exploretechnicalqualitycomponents(validity,reliability,fairness)of
classroomassessment.
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
888.849.0851 marzanoresearch.com
Whatdegreeofimportancewouldyouassigntobeinganexpertonclassroomassessment?
Why?
Whatnumberbestrepresentsyourdegreeofassessmentliteracywhenyoubecamea
teacher?
1 4 532
LEAST MOST
3MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
Before Statements After A D 1. Assessment is one means of
offering feedback to learners. A D
A D 2. While there are multiple types of classroom assessment, obtrusive assessment should be used more frequently than other types.
A D
A D 3. The terms standard, learning goal, and learning target mean the same thing.
A D
A D 4. A teacher need only be concerned about teaching content considered priority.
A D
A D 5. A proficiency scale articulates a learning progression. A D
A D 6. All proficiency scales should be written in student-friendly language.
A D
A D 7. A proficiency scale is to be used by the classroom teacher only. A D
A D 8. All items on an assessment should be written to align with Score 3.0 on the proficiency scale.
A D
A D 9. Effective feedback is corrective in nature. A D
A D 10. A common assessment typically results in data discussions. A D
Please complete the anticipation guide…
4
ClassroomAssessmentsTypes
Type Description NotesObtrusive Obtrusiveassessmentsinterruptthe
normalflowofactivityintheclassroom.Instructiondoesnotoccurduringobtrusiveassessments.Instead,instructionstopswhilestudents“taketheassessment”(hencethetermobtrusive).
Unobtrusive Unobtrusiveassessmentsdonotinterrupttheflowofactivity intheclassroom.Infact,studentsmightnoteven beawarethattheyarebeingassessedduringanunobtrusiveassessment.ThesetypesofassessmentsareoftenusedwithProceduralknowledgebutcanalsobeusedtoassessDeclarativeknowledge.
Student-Generated Student-generatedassessmentsareprobablythemostunderutilizedformofclassroom assessment.Asthenameimplies,adefiningfeatureofstudent-generatedassessmentsisthatthestudentsgenerateideasaboutthemannerinwhichtheywilldemonstratetheircurrentstatusonagiventopic.Teachersmightconsiderchoiceboardstoofferideastogetstudentsinvolvedinthistypeofassessment.
UsesofAssessmentData:Instructional Feedback
FormativeScores
Summative Scores
5Formative Assessment and Standards-Based Grading • © 2010 Marzano Research Laboratory • marzanoresearch.com
Visit marzanoresearch.com/classroomstrategiesthatwork to download this page.
REPRODUCIBLE 35
Exercise 2.1
Obtrusive, Unobtrusive, and Student-Generated Assessments
After reading each of the following classroom assessment scenarios, determine whether it is best classified as an example of obtrusive, unobtrusive, or student-generated assessment.
1. Mona is very close to receiving an A on the content that has been covered in her art class this quarter. She approaches the teacher and proposes that she provide a sketch to show she has mastered the techniques presented during the quarter.
2. After teaching the concept of a thesis statement, discussing examples of successful thesis statements, and providing the students with opportunities for practice, Mr. Grace gives his students a topic and asks them to write a corresponding thesis statement. He scores the effectiveness of the thesis statements using a rubric and records the scores for each student.
3. After teaching a unit on editing and revising, Ms. Minturn asks her students to pull out a hard copy of an essay they composed earlier in the year. She breaks the class into pairs and asks them to read and suggest edits and revisions on their partners’ essays. She collects the revisions and grades each student according to a rubric on the effectiveness of his or her editing.
4. Mr. Davis is teaching a unit on shading. He takes his class to an outside garden, and while the students are creating compositions focusing on the shadows and colors they see, he walks around and observes their progress. Without interrupting, he records an assessment score for each student in his gradebook.
5. Ms. Lewis has been working with her students on a cooperative learning goal. While she is monitoring recess, she notices four of them working together to complete a double-dutch jump rope game. Because all four students have to cooperate to reach their goal, Ms. Lewis decides these students have fulfilled the requirement for score 3.0 on the rubric she has designed for cooperative skills.
6MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
ImportantConsiderationsforWritingProficiencyScales
Followthesestepsforgettingclearaboutwhatstudentsshouldknowandbeabletodo:• First,workcollaborativelytoidentifythemostimportantstandards.• Then,developaproficiencyscaleforeachstandard(topic)thatisidentifiedas
priority.• Besuretousethescalestoplaninstructionandassessment.
WhatIsaGuaranteedandViableCurriculum?• Aviablecurriculumisawell-
articulatedsetofknowledgeandskillsthateverychildshouldlearningradesK-12.Viablealsomeansitcanbetaughtforunderstandinginthetimeavailable.
• Aguaranteedcurriculummeansitistaughtineveryclassroomineveryschool.
NeedToKnow
ImportantToKnow
NiceToKnow
WhataretheCriteriaforPriority?• Endurance:Willthisprovideknowledgeand
skillsthatarevaluablebeyondasingletestdate?
• Leverage:Willthisprovideknowledgeandskillsthatarevaluablewithinmultipledisciplines?
• Readiness:Willthisprovidestudentswithtoolsforsuccessatthenextgradelevelorcourse?
• Teacherjudgment:Isthisskillorknowledgecriticalforallstudentstoknoworbeabletodo?
• Assessmentconnection:Willthisskillorknowledgebeassessedonaninstrumentusedforinstructionaldecision-makingoronthehigh-stakesexam?
Aguaranteedandviablecurriculumiscomprisedofthreemainelements.(AdaptedfromMcTigheandWiggins,UnderstandingbyDesign,2005).
7
STANDARDLEARNING GOAL
LEARNING TARGET
STANDARD LEARNINGGOAL LEARNINGTARGETThestudentwill
determineathemeorcentralideaofatextandhowitisconveyedthroughparticulardetails;providea
summaryofthetextdistinctfrompersonalopinionsorjudgments.
The studentwillsummarizeatext
distinctfrompersonalopinionsorjudgments.
Thestudentwillrecognizeorrecall
specificvocabulary,suchas:centralidea,detail,summarize,support,
text,theme.
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
STANDARD LEARNINGGOAL LEARNINGTARGET
8MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
THEME/CENTRAL IDEA
Score4.0
Thestudentwill(forexample):• Analyze multipletextswithdifferent
themes.• Explainhowhe/shehasexperienced
thethemeofatext.
Score3.0
Thestudentwill:• Describeathemeorcentralideaofa
text.• Summarizeagrade-appropriatetext.
Score2.0
Thestudentwill:• Recognizeorrecallspecific
terminology,suchas: centralidea,detail,summarize,support,text,theme.
• Determineathemeorcentralideaofatextfromteacher-providedoptions
• Identifydetailsthatsupportthethemeorcentralideaof atext.
• Summarizeatextusingateacher-providedgraphicorganizer.
9
Score4.0
Inadditiontoexhibitinglevel3performance,in-depthinferencesandapplicationsthatgoBEYONDwhatwastaughtinclass
Score3.0
Nomajorerrorsoromissionsregardinganyoftheinformationand/orprocesses(SIMPLEORCOMPLEX)thatwereexplicitlytaught
Score2.0
NomajorerrorsoromissionsregardingtheSIMPLERdetailsandprocessesBUTmajorerrorsoromissionsregardingthemorecomplexideasandprocesses
Score1.0
WithHELP,apartialknowledgeofsomeofthesimplerandcomplexdetailsandprocesses
Score0.0
Evenwithhelp,nounderstandingorskilldemonstrated
ProficiencyScales
ProficiencyScale“LookFors”
ScalesSHOULD:² Articulatealearningprogression.² Bepostedandabletobereadbystudents.² Bewritteninstudent-friendlylanguage(when
appropriate).² Bereferencedduringthelesson.
StudentsSHOULDbeabletoexplain:² Themeaningofthelevelsofperformance
articulatedinthescale.
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
10
Scale Practice Template
Score 4.0 – more complex Demonstrations of learning that go above and beyond what was explicitly taught
The student will:
Score 3.0 – the learning goal(s) or expectation(s) for all
The student will:
Score 2.0 – the simpler stuff Foundational knowledge, simpler procedures, isolated details, vocabulary
The student will:
Score 1.0
With help, the student can perform Score 2.0 and 3.0 expectations
Score 0.0 Even with help, the student cannot perform expectations
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
11
Notes:
888.849.0851 marzanoresearch.com
Important)Idea)#1…)!!
Proficiency!scales!provide!clear!focus!for!instruc4on!to!essen4al!
learning!goals.!
888.849.0851 marzanoresearch.com
Important)Idea)#2…)!!
Proficiency!scales!serve!as!the!framework!for!a!high6quality!classroom!
assessment.!
888.849.0851 marzanoresearch.com
Important)Idea)#3…!!
Proficiency!scales!ensure!alignment!of!curriculum,!instruc4on,!assessment,!
and!feedback.!
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
9(Marzano(Research(2015(!(marzanoresearch.com(
MARZANO Research Laboratory888.849.0851 marzanoresearch.com
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com 12
13
78 | REPRODUCIBLE
Learning by Doing © 2006, 2010 Solution Tree Press • solution-tree.comVisit go.solution-tree.com/PLCbooks to download this page.
Reviews of accountability data from hundreds of schools reveal the schools with the greatest gains in achievement consistently employ common assessments, nonfiction writing, and collaborative scoring by faculty (Reeves, 2004).
Powerful, proven structures for improved results are at hand. “It starts when a group of teachers meet regularly as a team to identify essential and valued student learning, develop common formative assessments, analyze current levels of achievement, set achievement goals, and then share and create lessons and strategies to improve upon those levels.” (Schmoker, 2004b, p. 48).
“[Common formative assessments provide] regular and timely feedback regarding student attainment of the most critical standards . . . [and] also foster consistent expectations and priorities within a grade level, course, and department regarding standards, instruction, and assessment. . . . Most importantly, common formative assessment results enable educators to diagnose student learning needs accurately in time to make instructional modifications.” (Ainsworth, 2007, pp. 95–96)
The schools and districts that doubled student achievement added another layer of testing—common formative or benchmark assessments. These assessments were designed to provide detailed and concrete information on what students know and do not know with respect to specific learning targets (Odden & Archibald, 2009).
The key to improved student achievement was moving beyond an individual teacher looking at his or her classroom data. Instead, it took getting same-grade teacher teams to meet, analyze the results of each interim assessment to understand what concepts in the curriculum were posing difficulty for students, share ideas, figure out the best interventions, and actually follow up in their classrooms (Christman et al., 2009).
In schools that help students burdened by poverty achieve remarkable success, teachers work in collaborative teams to build common formative assessments and use the data to identify which students need help and which need greater challenges. But they also use data to inform teachers’ practice, to discuss why one teacher is having success in teaching a concept and others are not, and what the more successful teacher can teach his or her colleagues (Chenoweth, 2009).
Why Should We Use Common Assessments?
14
PrioritizationofStandards
ProficiencyScales
TestBlueprint
Item/TaskSelectionorDevelopment
AdministrationandScoringGuidelines
DataDiscussions/Analysis
CommonAssessmentDevelopmentCycle
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
Assessment Attributes Notes1.Weuseproficiencyscalesasthebasisforallassessments.
2.Wewriteassessmentitemsforeachleveloftheproficiencyscale.
3.Weadministercommonassessments andscorethembasedonthelevelsoftheproficiencyscale.
4.Wediscusstheresultsofassessmentswithinthecollaborativeteam.
5.Weuseassessmentsasformativefeedbacktomodifyinstruction.
6.WehavedevelopedSMARTgoalsbasedonproficiency scales.
7.Wehavestudentstracktheirownprogress.
8.Wereportstudentachievementusingastandards-referencedsystem.
EnsuringHigh-QualityClassroomAssessment
Practices
15
16
4.NF.2Comparetwofractionswithdifferentnumeratorsanddifferentdenominatorsusing<,>,and=,andjustifythecomparison
NUMBERANDQUANTITYCompareFractions
Grade4
Score4.0 In additiontoscore3.0performance,thestudentdemonstratesin-depthinferencesandapplicationsthatgobeyondwhatwastaught.• Forexample,given3ormorefractionswithdifferentdenominators,thestudentorders
themleasttogreatestorgreatesttoleast• Forexample,thestudentcomparesimproperand/ormixedfractionswithunlike
denominators
Score3.0 Thestudent:• comparestwofractionswithdifferentnumeratorsanddifferentdenominatorsusing<,>,
and=• justifiesthecomparison
Score2.0 Thestudentrecognizesorrecallsspecificvocabulary,suchas:• compare,comparison,denominator,equivalent,fraction,generate,justify,numeratorThestudentperformsbasicprocesses,suchas:• recognizessymbols,suchas<,>,and=• recognizesandgeneratesequivalentfractions• comparestwofractionswithlikedenominators
Score1.0 Withhelp,thestudentdemonstratespartialsuccessatscore2.0 andscore3.0
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
4.NF.2&
Name________________ Teacher_____________
Comparetwofractionswithdifferentnumeratorsanddifferentdenominatorsusing<,>,and=,andjustifythecomparison
Score2.0–Solvenumbers1-4.Write<,>,or=foreachpairoffractions.
1. !"___
#"
2. $
%___&%
3. '%___
"%
4. !
$___#$
__/4
Score3.0–Solvenumbers5-8.Write<,>,or=foreachpairoffractions.Justifyyouranswerwithwork,pictures,orwords.
5. !"___
"(
6. '
!___#&
7. ($___
&%
8. #
!___"$
__/8
18MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
19
4.NF.2&
Score4.0–Solvethestoryproblembelow.Justifyyouranswerwithwork,pictures,orwords.
9.CindyfeedshercatsFluffy,Mittens,andSpotseachday.Fluffyeats2!"cupsof
foodeachday.Mittenseats2#$cupsoffoodeachday.Spotseats2!%cupsoffood
eachday.Putthecats’namesinorderfromleasttogreatestaccordingtohowmuchtheyeateachday.
____________________________________________________________
__/2
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
LIFE
SCI
ENCE
He
ritab
le T
raits
Gr
ade
7 Sc
ore
4.0
The
stud
ent w
ill:
• Di
scus
s how
her
itabl
e tr
aits
and
non
herit
able
trai
ts a
ffect
one
ano
ther
. Sc
ore
3.0
The
stud
ent w
ill:
• Di
ffere
ntia
te h
erita
ble
trai
ts fr
om n
onhe
ritab
le tr
aits
in re
al-w
orld
scen
ario
s.
Scor
e 2.
0 Th
e st
uden
t will
: •
Reco
gnize
acc
urat
e st
atem
ents
abo
ut a
nd is
olat
ed e
xam
ples
of h
erita
ble
and
nonh
erita
ble
trai
ts.
Scor
e 1.
0 W
ith h
elp,
par
tial s
ucce
ss a
t sco
re 2
.0 co
nten
t and
scor
e 3.
0 co
nten
t. Sc
ore
0.0
Even
with
hel
p, n
o su
cces
s.
____
_ Na
me
thre
e tr
aits
you
like
abo
ut y
ours
elf.
Are
thes
e he
ritab
le tr
aits
or n
ot?
Expl
ain
your
ans
wer
. __
___
Hem
ophi
lia is
an
inhe
rited
dise
ase
that
pre
vent
s you
r blo
od fr
om c
lott
ing.
Thi
s mea
ns th
at if
you
eve
r get
a cu
t or a
scra
pe, y
ou m
ight
lose
so m
uch
bloo
d th
at it
coul
d be
life
thre
aten
ing.
If y
ou w
ere
born
with
this
dise
ase,
wha
t kin
ds o
f thi
ngs w
ould
you
hav
e to
avo
id?
Wha
t kin
ds o
f thi
ngs m
ight
you
be
good
at i
nste
ad?
Wha
t kin
ds o
f per
sona
lity
trai
ts m
ight
you
hav
e th
at o
ther
peo
ple
mig
ht n
ot h
ave?
Exp
lain
you
r ans
wer
. __
___
True
or F
alse
: Al
l dise
ases
are
inhe
rited
. ___
__
____
_ Pu
t a ch
eck
in fr
ont o
f the
trai
ts y
ou ca
n de
velo
p ov
er ti
me.
___
shoe
size
_
__ g
ende
r
_
__ k
now
ledg
e of
hist
ory
__
_ fe
ar o
f sna
kes
____
_ Jo
ey si
gned
up
for t
he su
mm
er sp
ellin
g be
e ju
st a
fter C
hrist
mas
. He
did
not p
ract
ice v
ery
muc
h be
caus
e he
was
pla
ying
bas
ebal
l, an
d he
wen
t to
Flor
ida
with
his
pare
nts o
ver s
prin
g br
eak.
Whe
n th
e be
e ca
me,
he
lost
in th
e fir
st ro
und.
Late
r tha
t nig
ht h
e to
ld h
is m
othe
r he
lost
bec
ause
he
is no
t ver
y sm
art a
bout
wor
ds. D
o yo
u th
ink
this
is co
rrec
t? W
hy o
r why
not
? __
___
True
or F
alse
: If
your
mom
is a
fraid
of r
olle
r coa
ster
s, yo
u w
ill in
herit
that
fear
from
her
. __
___
Sim
on’s
mot
her a
lway
s ask
s him
to g
o to
the
groc
ery
stor
e w
ith h
er so
that
he
can
reac
h th
e ite
ms o
n th
e to
p sh
elf.
He c
an re
ach
alm
ost e
very
thin
g sh
e po
ints
out
. Is t
his b
ecau
se S
imon
was
bor
n ta
ll, o
r is i
t bec
ause
he
has s
o m
uch
prac
tice
reac
hing
for i
tem
s in
high
pla
ces?
Has
he
inhe
rited
his
abili
ty
to re
ach
item
s on
the
top
shel
f? E
xpla
in y
our a
nsw
er.
____
_ Ex
ampl
es o
f inh
erite
d tr
aits
are
___
____
____
____
____
_ an
d __
____
____
____
____
__.
20MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
Assessmen
tItemTy
pesandLevelsofK
nowledge
Type
sofAssessm
ent
Items
LevelsofK
nowledge
Score2.0(sim
pleC
ontent)
Score3.0(atthe
levelof
thestandard)
Score4.0(com
plex
conten
t)Basickno
wledgeandskills
thatstudentshavelearned
durin
gtheinstructionalu
nit—
fairlyeasy
Morecomplexkno
wledgeand
skillsthatstudentshave
learneddu
ringthe
instructionalu
nit—
doableif
stud
ents
participatedin
classroom
instructional
lesson
sandactivities
Inferencesora
pplicationsthat
gobeyon
dwhattheywere
explicitlytaught—
challenging
Selected
Respon
seIte
ms
Shortitemswith
asm
all
numberofcorrectrespo
nses;
optio
nsareofte
ninclu
ded(fo
rexam
ple,m
ultip
lecho
ice,
matching,ordering,true/false,
fill-in-the-blank,m
ultip
le
respon
se[asksfo
rtwoor
morecorrectansw
ers])
Constru
cted
Respon
seItemsthatrequireth
econstructio
nofoneto
afe
wsentences
(scorin
gguidancerequired)
Essay/Extend
edRe
spon
seLongerwrittenrespon
seofseveralparagraph
s;coversm
ore
inform
ationandoftenrequ
iresstud
entstoconn
ect,analyze,or
applyinform
ation;usuallyrequiresstud
entstousemultip
le
levelsofkno
wledge(scorin
gguidancerequired)
Person
alCo
mmun
icatio
nSpokenversio
nofselectedrespon
seitemsorsh
ortw
rittenrespon
ses;longerspo
kenitemssuch
asquestion-and-answ
ersessio
nsorstructureddiscussio
n(scorin
gguidancerequired)
Perfo
rmanceTa
skRequ
iresstud
entstodemon
stratethattheyhavem
astered
specificskillsa
ndcom
petenciesbyperform
ingorprodu
cing
something(scoringguidancerequired)
21MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
22
Example ItemsLearning Goal: Reproduction and Heredity
Score 2.0Matcheachvocabularytermwiththeanswerthatbestdescribesitbywritingtheletterofthecorrectanswernexttoitscorrespondingvocabularyterm.Therearemoreanswersthantherearevocabularyterms,soyouwon’tfindatermforeveryanswer.
(a) Theprocessthatresultsinanoffspringthatisanexactcopyoftheoneparent_____heredity(b) Theproductofthereproductiveprocessofananimalorplant(c) Theprocessofpassinginstructionsforspecifyingtraitsfromonegenerationtoanother_____offspring(d) Theprocessthatinvolvesamaleandfemaleparent(e) Theproductofasexualreproduction _____sexualreproduction(f) Theelementofacellthatcarriesasingleunitofinformation(g) Theproductofacelldividing(h) Theelementofacellthatallowsthecelltosplit _____asexualreproduction(i) Thecontributionofthemaleinthereproductiveprocess(j) Thepartofthecellthathousesthechromosomes _____gene(k) Thetypeofreproductionusedbyallanimalsandallformsofbacteria
Score3.0Whichofthefollowingbestexplainswhatwouldhappentoafieldoffloweringplantsifmostoftheinsectsandbirdsthatvisitedthefieldsuddenlydiedoutandnootherinsectsorbirdsreplacedthem?Whenyouhaveselectedyouranswer,explainwhatisincorrectabouteachoftheanswersyoudidnotselect.
(a) Theplantswouldalldiesoutbecausethebirdsandinsectsleavefertilizerthatmakestheplantsgrow.(b) Theplantswouldn’tbeaffectedtoomuchbecausetheycanlivewithoutbirdsandinsects.(c) Theplantswouldalldiebecauseinsectsandbirdshelptheplantsreproducesexually.(d) Theplantswouldalldiebecausetheinsectsandbirdshelptheplantsreproduceasexually.(e) Somebutnotalloftheplantswoulddiebecausetheinsectsandbirdshelptheplantsreproducesexually.(f) Somebutnotalloftheplantswoulddiebecausetheinsectsandbirdshelptheplansreproduceasexually.
Score4.0Explainthedifferencesbetweeninheritedtraitsandthosethatarecausedbyenvironment.Thenlistsometraitsyouhavethatareinheritedandsomethatarecausedbyenvironment.Finally,explainwhyyouthinkyourbehaviorisaffectedmorebyyourinheritedtraitsoryourenvironmentaltraits.
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
UsingResponseCodestoScoreCommonAssessmentsWiththisapproach,eachstudent’sresponseoneachitemiscodedascorrect,partiallycorrect,orincorrect,asopposedtoassigningpointstoeachitem.Afterscoringindividualitems,theteacherdeterminesthepatternofresponsesandassignsascoreaccordingly.Forexample,ifastudent’sanswersarecorrectonallitemsofthescore2.0sectionofthetest,partiallycorrectontwoitemsofthescore3.0sectionofthetestandcorrectonthethirditemofthescore3.0section,andincorrectonthetwoitemsofthescore4.0sectionofthetest,thatstudentwouldreceiveascore2.5.
Section ItemNumberCorrect,Partially
Correct,orIncorrect?
SectionPattern
Score2.0 1 C
CORRECT2 C3 C4 C5 C
Score3.0 6 PCPARTIALLYCORRECT7 C
8 PCScore4.0 9 I INCORRECT10 I
OVERALLSCORE 2.5Itisimportanttonotethatiftheassessmentaddressesmorethanoneproficiencyscale,studentswillreceiveonescoreperscale,ratherthanoneoverallscore.Thatis,ifanassessmentincludesitemsthatcovertwodifferenttopicsandwasdesignedusingtwoproficiencyscales,astudentmightreceiveanoverallscoreof2.5foronetopicandanoverallscoreof3.0forthesecondtopic.Theteacherdoesnotassignanoverallscorefortheentiretest.
27MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
28
EastHighSchoolCommonAssessmentResults
ClassroomResultsBiologyTeacherA PercentProficient
#1: 70%
#2: 90%#3: 60%
BiologyTeacherB PercentProficient#1: 75%#2: 88%#3: 52%
BiologyTeacherC PercentProficient#1: 65%#2: 85%#3: 50%
BiologyTeacherD PercentProficient#1: 72%#2: 75%#3: 45%
EastHighSchoolCommonAssessmentResults– BiologyTeacherA
Item1 Item2 Item3 Item4 Item5 Item6 Item7 Item8 Item9Student1 Y Y N Y Y N N N NStudent2 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N YStudent3 Y Y Y Y N Y Y N YStudent4 N N N N Y Y N N NStudent5 N Y Y Y N Y Y Y YStudent6 Y N Y Y Y Y N Y NStudent7 Y Y N Y Y N Y N YStudent8 N Y Y N Y Y Y Y YStudent9 Y N N Y Y Y Y N NStudent10 N Y Y Y N Y Y Y YStudent11 Y N Y Y Y Y Y N YStudent12 Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y NStudent13 N Y Y N Y Y Y Y NStudent14 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N YStudent15 N N N Y Y Y Y N YStudent16 N Y Y Y N Y N N NStudent17 Y Y Y Y N Y Y N YStudent18 N N Y Y Y Y Y N NStudent19 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YStudent20 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y NStudent21 N Y Y Y Y Y N N NPERCENTCORRECT 57% 71% 76% 85% 76% 90% 71% 38% 52%
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
CommonAssessmentDiscussionQuestions
1)Onwhichpartsoftheassessmentdidstudentsperformwell?
2)Onwhichpartsoftheassessmentdidstudentsstruggle?
3)Werethereanypatternsevidentinthestudentresponsesthatweneedtodiscussasateam?
4)Doestheassessmentneedrevising?Whichitems?Why?
5)Whichstudentsareinneedofspecialattention?
Wediscusstheresultsofassessmentswithinthecollaborativeteam.
29
Quality Criteria for Classroom
Assessments
1. Assessmentsarevalid.Theassessmentmeasureswhatis intendedtobemeasured.Itproducesaccurateandtruthfulresults.
2. Scoringisconsistent orreliable.Theassessmentproducesbelievableresultsthatmirrorthelearningthathasoccurred.Consistentresultsaregleanedacrossmultipleusersofthetool.
3. Assessmentsandsurroundingprocesses arefair.-Theleveloftheassessmentisappropriate.-Studentshavereceivedadequateopportunitytolearn.-Theassessmentisfreefrombiasandtheformatdoesnotinterferewithstudentsengagingintheassessment.
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
30
!!! !! !! !
!!!
Assessment'Review'Checklist'''
Review'Criteria'Yes' No' Item'#s'
Needing'Revision'
'Comments'
The!assessment!measures!the!knowledge!and!skills!described!in!the!standard.!!!
! ! ! !
The!assessment!is!free!from!bias.!!!!
! ! ! !
The!assessment!is!written!at!the!developmentally!appropriate!level!and!correct!readability!level.!!
! ! ! !
Assessment!items!follow!guidelines!and!are!clearly!written.!!!
! ! ! !
The!Answer!Key!is!accurate!and!matches!the!assessment.!!!
! ! ! !
EVERY!item!has!an!answer.!“Answers!may!vary”!is!typically!not!acceptable.!!
! ! ! !
A!rubric!or!checklist!is!provided,!if!needed.!!!!
! ! ! !
Directions!are!present,!and!are!clear!and!concise.!!!
! ! ! !
The!“Materials!Needed”!list!is!accurate!and!complete.!!!
! ! ! !
!
Assessment'Review'Checklist'Content'Area'___________'
Grade'Level/Course'and'Standard(s)'___________''
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
31
ProficiencyScale
MeasurementTopic Standards
MakingClaimsandSupportingWith
Evidence
RL.8.1Citethetextualevidencethatmoststronglysupportsananalysisofwhatthetextsaysexplicitlyaswellasinferencesdrawnfromthetext.RI.8.1Citethetextualevidencethatmoststronglysupportsananalysisofwhatthetextsaysexplicitlyaswellasinferencesdrawnfromthetext.W.8.1.aIntroduceclaim(s),acknowledgeanddistinguishtheclaim(s)fromalternateoropposingclaims,andorganizethereasonsandevidencelogically.W.8.1.bSupportclaim(s)withlogicalreasoningandrelevantevidence,usingaccurate,crediblesourcesanddemonstratinganunderstandingofthetopicortext.
4.0 • Identifytwocompetingclaimsaboutatext,supporteachwithtextualevidence,anddecidewhichoftheclaimsisbettersupported.
3.5 Inadditiontoscore3.0performance,partialsuccessatscore4.0content
3.0 • Makeclaimsaboutwhataspecifictextsaysexplicitlyanduserelevanttextualevidencetosupportthoseclaims.
2.5 Nomajorerrorsoromissionsregardingscore2.0content,andpartialsuccessatscore3.0content
2.0
• Understandtheconceptofaninference.• Understandtheconceptofaclaimthatissupportedbyevidence.• Understandtheconceptofevidenceexplicitinatext.• Findorrecognizeclaimsthataresupportedbytextualevidenceprovidedbytheteacher.• Findorrecognizetextualevidencetosupportclaimsprovidedbytheteacher.
EXAMPLEASSESSMENT
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
32
MAKINGANDSUPPORTINGCLAIMSASSESSMENTStandards:RL.8.1,RI.8.1,W.8.1.a,W.8.1.bPartA:Highlightthebestresponsetoeachitem.
1.Whenareadermakesaninferenceaboutatext,thatmeansthatthereaderhasnoticedsomethingthatis_________.
a.directlystated
b.indirectlyhintedat
c.explainedinafootnote
d.notpresentinthetextatall
2.Ifyouarewritinganessayaboutabookandwanttosupportyourclaimwithtextualevidence,thebestthingtodowouldbe_________.
a.citeadirectquote
b.paraphrasethetext
c.refertoaquotefromanexpert
d.eitheraorb
3.ConsiderthefollowingquotefromToKillaMockingbirdandthenselecttheclaimthatitbestsupports:“Mockingbirdsdon’tdoonethingbutmakemusicforustoenjoy.Theydon’teatuppeople’sgardens,don’tnestincorncribs,theydon’tdoonethingbutsingtheirheartsoutforus.Thatwhyit’sasintokillamockingbird”(Lee,1960,p.119).
a.Childrenareoftensmarterthanadultsexpect.
b.Punishinginnocentpeopleiswrong.
c.Someanimalsarepests.
d.Alwaysstandupforwhatyoubelievein.
4.ConsiderthefollowingclaimaboutToKillaMockingbirdandselectthequotethatbestsupportsit:InMaycomb,beingmasculineormanlymeansbeingphysicallyable.
a.“ForsomereasonDillhadstartedcryingandcouldn’tstop;quietlyatfirst,thenhissobswereheardbyseveralpeopleinthebalcony”(Lee,1960,p.265).
b.“Jemgrabbedhisleftwristandmyrightwrist,IgrabbedmyleftwristandJem’srightwrist,wecrouched,andDillsatonoursaddle.Weraisedhimandhecaughtthewindowsill”(Lee,1960,p.70).
c.“Jemwasscarlet.Ipulledathissleeve,andwewerefollowedupthesidewalkbyaphilippiconourfamily’smoraldegeneration,themajorpremiseofwhichwasthathalftheFincheswereintheasylumanyway,butifourmotherwerelivingwewouldnothavecometosuchastate”(Lee,1960,136).
d.“Ourfatherdidn’tdoanything…..Atticusdidnotdriveadump-truckforthecounty,hewasnotthesheriff,hedidnotfarm,workinagarage,ordoanythingthatcouldpossiblyarousetheadmirationofanyone”(Lee,1960,p.118).
MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
5.ConsiderthefollowingclaimaboutToKillaMockingbirdandselectthequotethatbestsupportsit:Womeninthestoryaretypicallypoliteontheoutsidebutcruelunderneath.
a.“Iwonderedattheworldofwomen…..Imustsoonenterthisworld,whereonitssurfacefragrantladiesrockedslowly,fannedgently,anddrankcoolwater.ButIwasmoreathomeinmyfather’sworld.PeoplelikeMr.HeckTatedidnottrapyouwithinnocentquestionstomakefunofyou;evenJemwasnothighlycriticalunlessyousaidsomethingstupid”(Lee,1960,pp.312–313).
b.“Ifeltthestarchedwallsofapinkcottonpenitentiaryclosinginonme,andforthesecondtimeinmylifeIthoughtofrunningaway”(Lee,1960,p.182).
c.“WhenwearrivedattheLanding,AuntAlexandrakissedUncleJack,FranciskissedUncleJack,UncleJimmyshookhandssilentlywithUncleJack”(Lee,1960,p.107).
d.“MissCarolinewasnomorethantwenty-one.Shehadbrightauburnhair,pinkcheeks,andworecrimsonfingernailpolish.Shealsoworehigh-heeledpumpsandared-and-white-stripeddress.Shelookedandsmelledlikeapeppermintdrop”(Lee,1960,p.21).PartB:Craftaresponsetoeachitem.Selectafonttooff-setyourresponsefromtheitemtext.1.ExaminethefollowingthreequotesfromToKillaMockingbirdandmakeaclaimthatissupportedbyallthree.Then,explainhoweachquotesupportsyourclaim.
“MissCarolineseemedunawarethattheragged,denim-shirtedandfloursack-skirtedfirstgrade,mostofwhomhadchoppedcottonandfedhogsfromthetimetheywereabletowalk,wereimmunetoimaginativeliterature”(Lee,1960,p.22). “InMaycomb,ifonewentforawalkwithnodefinitepurposeinmind,itwascorrecttobelieveone’smindincapableofdefinitepurpose”(Lee,1960,p.199). “[Atticus]didnotdothethingsourschoolmates’fathersdid:heneverwenthunting,hedidnotplaypokerorfishordrinkorsmoke.Hesatinthelivingroomandread”(Lee,1960,p.118).2.MakeaclaimaboutthewaymostcitizensofMaycombtreatchildrenandthewayAtticustreatschildren.Findatleasttwopiecesoftextualevidencetosupportyourclaim.3.MakeaclaimaboutathemeorpointthatHarperLeeconveysthroughthestoryofTomRobinson’sarrestandtrial.Useatleastthreepiecesoftextualevidencetosupportyourclaim.PartC:Craftaresponsetothisitem.Selectafonttooff-setyourresponsefromtheitemtext.Maketwoopposingclaimsaboutatheme,character,relationship,orothersituationinToKillaMockingbird.Supporteachclaimwithatleasttwopiecesoftextualevidenceandthenexplainwhichclaimisbettersupported.
33MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
34MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
WRI
TING
Argu
men
tativ
e
Grad
e 8
Scor
e 4.0
In ad
ditio
n to
scor
e 3.0
perfo
rman
ce, t
he st
uden
t dem
onst
rate
s in-
dept
h in
fere
nces
and
appl
icatio
ns th
at g
o be
yond
wha
t wa
s tau
ght.
Sc
ore 3
.5
In ad
dition
to sc
ore
3.0 pe
rform
ance
, par
tial s
ucce
ss a
t sco
re 4
.0 co
nten
t
Scor
e 3.0
The s
tude
nt w
ill wr
ite g
rade
-app
ropr
iate a
rgum
ents
to su
ppor
t clai
ms w
ith cl
ear r
easo
ns an
d re
levan
t evid
ence
(W.8.
1)
Sa
mpl
e Act
ivitie
s:
Stud
ents
resp
ond
indep
ende
ntly t
o the
prom
pt,
using
a ru
bric
outlin
ing e
xpec
tation
s.
Budg
et cu
ts ar
e for
cing
your
scho
ol to
drop
eith
er
the ad
vanc
ed b
and
class
es or
stre
ngth
and
cond
itionin
g cla
sses
. You
hav
e clo
se fr
iends
in
both
prog
rams
. Write
an a
rgum
ent s
uppo
rting
a de
cision
on w
hich c
lass t
o sto
p off
ering
.
Sc
ore 2
.5
No m
ajor e
rrors
or o
miss
ions r
egar
ding s
core
2.0 c
onten
t, an
d pa
rtial
succ
ess a
t sco
re 3
.0 co
ntent
Scor
e 2.0
The s
tude
nt w
ill re
cogn
ize o
r rec
all sp
ecifi
c voc
abul
ary,
such
as:
• arg
umen
t, cla
im, c
onclu
ding s
tatem
ent,
credib
le, e
viden
ce, r
easo
ning,
sour
ce, s
uppo
rt
The s
tude
nt w
ill pe
rform
bas
ic pr
oces
ses,
such
as:
• ide
ntify
the
char
acte
ristic
s of a
mod
el ar
gum
ent c
ompo
sition
• w
rite
argu
men
ts us
ing a
teac
her-p
rovid
ed te
mplat
e
Sam
ple A
ctivi
ties:
Af
ter th
e cla
ss re
ads a
nd di
scus
ses m
edica
l ev
idenc
e tha
t dea
ls wi
th fa
ctors
of st
uden
t su
cces
s inc
luding
num
ber o
f hou
rs of
slee
p. Us
ing
a tem
plate
for a
n ar
gume
ntativ
e pap
er, s
tuden
ts re
spon
d to t
he pr
ompt:
Writ
e a le
tter t
o you
pa
rents
argu
ing e
ither
for o
r aga
inst th
eir de
cision
to
enf
orce
a 9
o’cl
ock b
edtim
e du
ring
the
scho
ol ye
ar.
Sc
ore 1
.5
Partia
l suc
cess
at sc
ore
2.0 co
ntent,
and m
ajor e
rrors
or o
miss
ions r
egar
ding
scor
e 3.0
cont
ent
Scor
e 1.0
With
help
, par
tial s
ucce
ss at
scor
e 2.0
cont
ent a
nd sc
ore 3
.0 co
nten
t
Sc
ore 0
.5
With
help,
parti
al su
cces
s at s
core
2.0
cont
ent b
ut no
t at s
core
3.0
cont
ent
Scor
e 0.0
Even
with
help
, no
succ
ess
35MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com
Argumentative Writing Scoring Rubric Score Statement of
Purpose/Focus Organization Elaboration of Evidence
Language and Vocabulary Conventions
4
The response is fully sustained and consistently and purposefully focused: • Claim is clearly stated,
focused and strongly maintained
• Claim is introduced and communicated clearly within the context
The response has a clear and effective organizational structure creating unity and completeness: • Effective, consistent use
of a variety of transitional strategies
• Logical progression of ideas from beginning to end
• Effective introduction and conclusion for audience and purpose
• Strong connections among ideas, with some syntactic variety
The response provides thorough and convincing support/evidence for the writer’s claim that includes the effective use of sources, facts, and details. The response achieves substantial depth that is specific and relevant: • Use of evidence from
sources is smoothly integrated, comprehensive, relevant, and concrete
• Effective use of a variety of elaborative techniques
The response clearly and effectively expresses ideas, using precise language: • Use of academic and
domain-specific vocabulary is clearly appropriate for the audience and purpose
The response demonstrates a strong command of conventions: • Few, if any, errors are
present in usage and sentence formation
• Effective and consistent use of punctuation, capitalization, and spelling
3
The response is adequately sustained and generally focused: • Claim is clear and for the
most part maintained, though some loosely related material may be present
• Context provided for the claim is adequate
The response has an evident organizational structure and a sense of completeness, though there may be minor flaws and some ideas may be loosely connected: • Adequate use of
transitional strategies with some variety
• Adequate progression of ideas from beginning to end
• Adequate introduction and conclusion
• Adequate, if slightly inconsistent, connection among ideas
The response provides adequate support/evidence for writer’s claim that includes the use of sources, facts, and details. The response achieves some depth and specificity but is predominantly general: • Some evidence from
sources is integrated, though citations may be general or imprecise
• Adequate use of some elaborative techniques
The response adequately expresses ideas, employing a mix of precise with more general language: • Use of domain-specific
vocabulary is generally appropriate for the audience and purpose
The response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions: • Some errors in usage and
sentence formation may be present, but no systematic pattern of errors is displayed
• Adequate use of punctuation, capitalization, and spelling
2
The response is somewhat sustained and may have a minor drift in focus: • May be clearly focused
on the claim, but is insufficiently sustained
• Claim on the issue may be somewhat unclear and unfocused
The response has an inconsistent organizational structure, and flaws are evident: • Inconsistent use of basic
transitional strategies with little variety
• Uneven progression of ideas from beginning to end
• Conclusion and introduction, if present, are weak
• Weak connection among ideas
The response provides uneven, cursory support/evidence for the writer’s claim that includes partial or uneven use of sources, facts, and details, and achieves little depth: • Evidence from sources is
weakly integrated, and citations, if present, are uneven
• Weak or uneven use of elaborative techniques
The response expresses ideas unevenly, using simplistic language: • Use of domain-specific
vocabulary may at times be inappropriate for the audience and purpose
1
The response may be related to the purpose but may offer little relevant detail: • May be very brief • May have a major drift • Claim may be confusing
or ambiguous
The response has little or no discernible organizational structure: • Few or no transitional
strategies are evident • Frequent extraneous
ideas may intrude
The response provides minimal support/evidence for the writer’s claim that includes little or no use of sources, facts, and details: • Use of evidence from
sources is minimal, absent, in error, or irrelevant
The response expression of ideas is vague, lacks clarity, or is confusing: • Uses little language or
domain-specific vocabulary
• May have little sense of audience and purpose
Session'Reflection'Sheet''
'!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!36MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com