38
Assessment Literacy and Formative Assessment Resource Development Training Presented by Marzano Research for Wyoming Department of Education Fall 2017 Ms. Jan K. Hoegh, Author and Associate [email protected]

Assessment Literacy and Formative Assessment Resource ... · Formative Assessment Resource Development Training ... , learning goals, and learning targets ... written in student-friendly

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

AssessmentLiteracyandFormativeAssessment

ResourceDevelopmentTraining

PresentedbyMarzano Researchfor

WyomingDepartmentofEducationFall2017

Ms.JanK.Hoegh,[email protected]

2

Day#1LearningOutcomes:o Gainanawarenessoftheresearchregardingclassroomassessment.o Understandthedifferencesamongobtrusive,unobtrusive,and

student-generatedassessmentsandhowtouseeachintheclassroom.o Learnessentialpracticesforclassroomassessment:

1) Identifyprioritystandardsforinformingclassroomassessmentdevelopment.2) Provideclearunderstandingofstandards,learninggoals,andlearningtargets

throughproficiencyscaledevelopment.3) Provideinstructionthatfocusesontheprioritystandard.4) Providefrequentandmeaningfulfeedback.5) Provideopportunitiesforstudentstosetgoals,reflectonlearning,andtracktheir

ownprogress.

Day#2LearningOutcomes:o Learnaboutcommonassessmentdevelopmentanduseformonitoring

studentprogresstoessentialcontent.o Learnaboutdevelopinghigh-qualityperformanceassessments.o Exploretechnicalqualitycomponents(validity,reliability,fairness)of

classroomassessment.

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

888.849.0851 marzanoresearch.com

Whatdegreeofimportancewouldyouassigntobeinganexpertonclassroomassessment?

Why?

Whatnumberbestrepresentsyourdegreeofassessmentliteracywhenyoubecamea

teacher?

1 4 532

LEAST MOST

3MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

Before Statements After A D 1. Assessment is one means of

offering feedback to learners. A D

A D 2. While there are multiple types of classroom assessment, obtrusive assessment should be used more frequently than other types.

A D

A D 3. The terms standard, learning goal, and learning target mean the same thing.

A D

A D 4. A teacher need only be concerned about teaching content considered priority.

A D

A D 5. A proficiency scale articulates a learning progression. A D

A D 6. All proficiency scales should be written in student-friendly language.

A D

A D 7. A proficiency scale is to be used by the classroom teacher only. A D

A D 8. All items on an assessment should be written to align with Score 3.0 on the proficiency scale.

A D

A D 9. Effective feedback is corrective in nature. A D

A D 10. A common assessment typically results in data discussions. A D

Please complete the anticipation guide…

4

ClassroomAssessmentsTypes

Type Description NotesObtrusive Obtrusiveassessmentsinterruptthe

normalflowofactivityintheclassroom.Instructiondoesnotoccurduringobtrusiveassessments.Instead,instructionstopswhilestudents“taketheassessment”(hencethetermobtrusive).

Unobtrusive Unobtrusiveassessmentsdonotinterrupttheflowofactivity intheclassroom.Infact,studentsmightnoteven beawarethattheyarebeingassessedduringanunobtrusiveassessment.ThesetypesofassessmentsareoftenusedwithProceduralknowledgebutcanalsobeusedtoassessDeclarativeknowledge.

Student-Generated Student-generatedassessmentsareprobablythemostunderutilizedformofclassroom assessment.Asthenameimplies,adefiningfeatureofstudent-generatedassessmentsisthatthestudentsgenerateideasaboutthemannerinwhichtheywilldemonstratetheircurrentstatusonagiventopic.Teachersmightconsiderchoiceboardstoofferideastogetstudentsinvolvedinthistypeofassessment.

UsesofAssessmentData:Instructional Feedback

FormativeScores

Summative Scores

5Formative Assessment and Standards-Based Grading • © 2010 Marzano Research Laboratory • marzanoresearch.com

Visit marzanoresearch.com/classroomstrategiesthatwork to download this page.

REPRODUCIBLE 35

Exercise 2.1

Obtrusive, Unobtrusive, and Student-Generated Assessments

After reading each of the following classroom assessment scenarios, determine whether it is best classified as an example of obtrusive, unobtrusive, or student-generated assessment.

1. Mona is very close to receiving an A on the content that has been covered in her art class this quarter. She approaches the teacher and proposes that she provide a sketch to show she has mastered the techniques presented during the quarter.

2. After teaching the concept of a thesis statement, discussing examples of successful thesis statements, and providing the students with opportunities for practice, Mr. Grace gives his students a topic and asks them to write a corresponding thesis statement. He scores the effectiveness of the thesis statements using a rubric and records the scores for each student.

3. After teaching a unit on editing and revising, Ms. Minturn asks her students to pull out a hard copy of an essay they composed earlier in the year. She breaks the class into pairs and asks them to read and suggest edits and revisions on their partners’ essays. She collects the revisions and grades each student according to a rubric on the effectiveness of his or her editing.

4. Mr. Davis is teaching a unit on shading. He takes his class to an outside garden, and while the students are creating compositions focusing on the shadows and colors they see, he walks around and observes their progress. Without interrupting, he records an assessment score for each student in his gradebook.

5. Ms. Lewis has been working with her students on a cooperative learning goal. While she is monitoring recess, she notices four of them working together to complete a double-dutch jump rope game. Because all four students have to cooperate to reach their goal, Ms. Lewis decides these students have fulfilled the requirement for score 3.0 on the rubric she has designed for cooperative skills.

6MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

ImportantConsiderationsforWritingProficiencyScales

Followthesestepsforgettingclearaboutwhatstudentsshouldknowandbeabletodo:• First,workcollaborativelytoidentifythemostimportantstandards.• Then,developaproficiencyscaleforeachstandard(topic)thatisidentifiedas

priority.• Besuretousethescalestoplaninstructionandassessment.

WhatIsaGuaranteedandViableCurriculum?• Aviablecurriculumisawell-

articulatedsetofknowledgeandskillsthateverychildshouldlearningradesK-12.Viablealsomeansitcanbetaughtforunderstandinginthetimeavailable.

• Aguaranteedcurriculummeansitistaughtineveryclassroomineveryschool.

NeedToKnow

ImportantToKnow

NiceToKnow

WhataretheCriteriaforPriority?• Endurance:Willthisprovideknowledgeand

skillsthatarevaluablebeyondasingletestdate?

• Leverage:Willthisprovideknowledgeandskillsthatarevaluablewithinmultipledisciplines?

• Readiness:Willthisprovidestudentswithtoolsforsuccessatthenextgradelevelorcourse?

• Teacherjudgment:Isthisskillorknowledgecriticalforallstudentstoknoworbeabletodo?

• Assessmentconnection:Willthisskillorknowledgebeassessedonaninstrumentusedforinstructionaldecision-makingoronthehigh-stakesexam?

Aguaranteedandviablecurriculumiscomprisedofthreemainelements.(AdaptedfromMcTigheandWiggins,UnderstandingbyDesign,2005).

7

STANDARDLEARNING GOAL

LEARNING TARGET

STANDARD LEARNINGGOAL LEARNINGTARGETThestudentwill

determineathemeorcentralideaofatextandhowitisconveyedthroughparticulardetails;providea

summaryofthetextdistinctfrompersonalopinionsorjudgments.

The studentwillsummarizeatext

distinctfrompersonalopinionsorjudgments.

Thestudentwillrecognizeorrecall

specificvocabulary,suchas:centralidea,detail,summarize,support,

text,theme.

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

STANDARD LEARNINGGOAL LEARNINGTARGET

8MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

THEME/CENTRAL IDEA

Score4.0

Thestudentwill(forexample):• Analyze multipletextswithdifferent

themes.• Explainhowhe/shehasexperienced

thethemeofatext.

Score3.0

Thestudentwill:• Describeathemeorcentralideaofa

text.• Summarizeagrade-appropriatetext.

Score2.0

Thestudentwill:• Recognizeorrecallspecific

terminology,suchas: centralidea,detail,summarize,support,text,theme.

• Determineathemeorcentralideaofatextfromteacher-providedoptions

• Identifydetailsthatsupportthethemeorcentralideaof atext.

• Summarizeatextusingateacher-providedgraphicorganizer.

9

Score4.0

Inadditiontoexhibitinglevel3performance,in-depthinferencesandapplicationsthatgoBEYONDwhatwastaughtinclass

Score3.0

Nomajorerrorsoromissionsregardinganyoftheinformationand/orprocesses(SIMPLEORCOMPLEX)thatwereexplicitlytaught

Score2.0

NomajorerrorsoromissionsregardingtheSIMPLERdetailsandprocessesBUTmajorerrorsoromissionsregardingthemorecomplexideasandprocesses

Score1.0

WithHELP,apartialknowledgeofsomeofthesimplerandcomplexdetailsandprocesses

Score0.0

Evenwithhelp,nounderstandingorskilldemonstrated

ProficiencyScales

ProficiencyScale“LookFors”

ScalesSHOULD:² Articulatealearningprogression.² Bepostedandabletobereadbystudents.² Bewritteninstudent-friendlylanguage(when

appropriate).² Bereferencedduringthelesson.

StudentsSHOULDbeabletoexplain:² Themeaningofthelevelsofperformance

articulatedinthescale.

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

10

Scale Practice Template

Score 4.0 – more complex Demonstrations of learning that go above and beyond what was explicitly taught

The student will:

Score 3.0 – the learning goal(s) or expectation(s) for all

The student will:

Score 2.0 – the simpler stuff Foundational knowledge, simpler procedures, isolated details, vocabulary

The student will:

Score 1.0

With help, the student can perform Score 2.0 and 3.0 expectations

Score 0.0 Even with help, the student cannot perform expectations

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

11

Notes:

888.849.0851 marzanoresearch.com

Important)Idea)#1…)!!

Proficiency!scales!provide!clear!focus!for!instruc4on!to!essen4al!

learning!goals.!

888.849.0851 marzanoresearch.com

Important)Idea)#2…)!!

Proficiency!scales!serve!as!the!framework!for!a!high6quality!classroom!

assessment.!

888.849.0851 marzanoresearch.com

Important)Idea)#3…!!

Proficiency!scales!ensure!alignment!of!curriculum,!instruc4on,!assessment,!

and!feedback.!

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

9(Marzano(Research(2015(!(marzanoresearch.com(

MARZANO Research Laboratory888.849.0851 marzanoresearch.com

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com 12

13

78 | REPRODUCIBLE

Learning by Doing © 2006, 2010 Solution Tree Press • solution-tree.comVisit go.solution-tree.com/PLCbooks to download this page.

Reviews of accountability data from hundreds of schools reveal the schools with the greatest gains in achievement consistently employ common assessments, nonfiction writing, and collaborative scoring by faculty (Reeves, 2004).

Powerful, proven structures for improved results are at hand. “It starts when a group of teachers meet regularly as a team to identify essential and valued student learning, develop common formative assessments, analyze current levels of achievement, set achievement goals, and then share and create lessons and strategies to improve upon those levels.” (Schmoker, 2004b, p. 48).

“[Common formative assessments provide] regular and timely feedback regarding student attainment of the most critical standards . . . [and] also foster consistent expectations and priorities within a grade level, course, and department regarding standards, instruction, and assessment. . . . Most importantly, common formative assessment results enable educators to diagnose student learning needs accurately in time to make instructional modifications.” (Ainsworth, 2007, pp. 95–96)

The schools and districts that doubled student achievement added another layer of testing—common formative or benchmark assessments. These assessments were designed to provide detailed and concrete information on what students know and do not know with respect to specific learning targets (Odden & Archibald, 2009).

The key to improved student achievement was moving beyond an individual teacher looking at his or her classroom data. Instead, it took getting same-grade teacher teams to meet, analyze the results of each interim assessment to understand what concepts in the curriculum were posing difficulty for students, share ideas, figure out the best interventions, and actually follow up in their classrooms (Christman et al., 2009).

In schools that help students burdened by poverty achieve remarkable success, teachers work in collaborative teams to build common formative assessments and use the data to identify which students need help and which need greater challenges. But they also use data to inform teachers’ practice, to discuss why one teacher is having success in teaching a concept and others are not, and what the more successful teacher can teach his or her colleagues (Chenoweth, 2009).

Why Should We Use Common Assessments?

14

PrioritizationofStandards

ProficiencyScales

TestBlueprint

Item/TaskSelectionorDevelopment

AdministrationandScoringGuidelines

DataDiscussions/Analysis

CommonAssessmentDevelopmentCycle

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

Assessment Attributes Notes1.Weuseproficiencyscalesasthebasisforallassessments.

2.Wewriteassessmentitemsforeachleveloftheproficiencyscale.

3.Weadministercommonassessments andscorethembasedonthelevelsoftheproficiencyscale.

4.Wediscusstheresultsofassessmentswithinthecollaborativeteam.

5.Weuseassessmentsasformativefeedbacktomodifyinstruction.

6.WehavedevelopedSMARTgoalsbasedonproficiency scales.

7.Wehavestudentstracktheirownprogress.

8.Wereportstudentachievementusingastandards-referencedsystem.

EnsuringHigh-QualityClassroomAssessment

Practices

15

16

4.NF.2Comparetwofractionswithdifferentnumeratorsanddifferentdenominatorsusing<,>,and=,andjustifythecomparison

NUMBERANDQUANTITYCompareFractions

Grade4

Score4.0 In additiontoscore3.0performance,thestudentdemonstratesin-depthinferencesandapplicationsthatgobeyondwhatwastaught.• Forexample,given3ormorefractionswithdifferentdenominators,thestudentorders

themleasttogreatestorgreatesttoleast• Forexample,thestudentcomparesimproperand/ormixedfractionswithunlike

denominators

Score3.0 Thestudent:• comparestwofractionswithdifferentnumeratorsanddifferentdenominatorsusing<,>,

and=• justifiesthecomparison

Score2.0 Thestudentrecognizesorrecallsspecificvocabulary,suchas:• compare,comparison,denominator,equivalent,fraction,generate,justify,numeratorThestudentperformsbasicprocesses,suchas:• recognizessymbols,suchas<,>,and=• recognizesandgeneratesequivalentfractions• comparestwofractionswithlikedenominators

Score1.0 Withhelp,thestudentdemonstratespartialsuccessatscore2.0 andscore3.0

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

17MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

4.NF.2&

Name________________ Teacher_____________

Comparetwofractionswithdifferentnumeratorsanddifferentdenominatorsusing<,>,and=,andjustifythecomparison

Score2.0–Solvenumbers1-4.Write<,>,or=foreachpairoffractions.

1. !"___

#"

2. $

%___&%

3. '%___

"%

4. !

$___#$

__/4

Score3.0–Solvenumbers5-8.Write<,>,or=foreachpairoffractions.Justifyyouranswerwithwork,pictures,orwords.

5. !"___

"(

6. '

!___#&

7. ($___

&%

8. #

!___"$

__/8

18MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

19

4.NF.2&

Score4.0–Solvethestoryproblembelow.Justifyyouranswerwithwork,pictures,orwords.

9.CindyfeedshercatsFluffy,Mittens,andSpotseachday.Fluffyeats2!"cupsof

foodeachday.Mittenseats2#$cupsoffoodeachday.Spotseats2!%cupsoffood

eachday.Putthecats’namesinorderfromleasttogreatestaccordingtohowmuchtheyeateachday.

____________________________________________________________

__/2

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

LIFE

SCI

ENCE

He

ritab

le T

raits

Gr

ade

7 Sc

ore

4.0

The

stud

ent w

ill:

• Di

scus

s how

her

itabl

e tr

aits

and

non

herit

able

trai

ts a

ffect

one

ano

ther

. Sc

ore

3.0

The

stud

ent w

ill:

• Di

ffere

ntia

te h

erita

ble

trai

ts fr

om n

onhe

ritab

le tr

aits

in re

al-w

orld

scen

ario

s.

Scor

e 2.

0 Th

e st

uden

t will

: •

Reco

gnize

acc

urat

e st

atem

ents

abo

ut a

nd is

olat

ed e

xam

ples

of h

erita

ble

and

nonh

erita

ble

trai

ts.

Scor

e 1.

0 W

ith h

elp,

par

tial s

ucce

ss a

t sco

re 2

.0 co

nten

t and

scor

e 3.

0 co

nten

t. Sc

ore

0.0

Even

with

hel

p, n

o su

cces

s.

____

_ Na

me

thre

e tr

aits

you

like

abo

ut y

ours

elf.

Are

thes

e he

ritab

le tr

aits

or n

ot?

Expl

ain

your

ans

wer

. __

___

Hem

ophi

lia is

an

inhe

rited

dise

ase

that

pre

vent

s you

r blo

od fr

om c

lott

ing.

Thi

s mea

ns th

at if

you

eve

r get

a cu

t or a

scra

pe, y

ou m

ight

lose

so m

uch

bloo

d th

at it

coul

d be

life

thre

aten

ing.

If y

ou w

ere

born

with

this

dise

ase,

wha

t kin

ds o

f thi

ngs w

ould

you

hav

e to

avo

id?

Wha

t kin

ds o

f thi

ngs m

ight

you

be

good

at i

nste

ad?

Wha

t kin

ds o

f per

sona

lity

trai

ts m

ight

you

hav

e th

at o

ther

peo

ple

mig

ht n

ot h

ave?

Exp

lain

you

r ans

wer

. __

___

True

or F

alse

: Al

l dise

ases

are

inhe

rited

. ___

__

____

_ Pu

t a ch

eck

in fr

ont o

f the

trai

ts y

ou ca

n de

velo

p ov

er ti

me.

___

shoe

size

_

__ g

ende

r

_

__ k

now

ledg

e of

hist

ory

__

_ fe

ar o

f sna

kes

____

_ Jo

ey si

gned

up

for t

he su

mm

er sp

ellin

g be

e ju

st a

fter C

hrist

mas

. He

did

not p

ract

ice v

ery

muc

h be

caus

e he

was

pla

ying

bas

ebal

l, an

d he

wen

t to

Flor

ida

with

his

pare

nts o

ver s

prin

g br

eak.

Whe

n th

e be

e ca

me,

he

lost

in th

e fir

st ro

und.

Late

r tha

t nig

ht h

e to

ld h

is m

othe

r he

lost

bec

ause

he

is no

t ver

y sm

art a

bout

wor

ds. D

o yo

u th

ink

this

is co

rrec

t? W

hy o

r why

not

? __

___

True

or F

alse

: If

your

mom

is a

fraid

of r

olle

r coa

ster

s, yo

u w

ill in

herit

that

fear

from

her

. __

___

Sim

on’s

mot

her a

lway

s ask

s him

to g

o to

the

groc

ery

stor

e w

ith h

er so

that

he

can

reac

h th

e ite

ms o

n th

e to

p sh

elf.

He c

an re

ach

alm

ost e

very

thin

g sh

e po

ints

out

. Is t

his b

ecau

se S

imon

was

bor

n ta

ll, o

r is i

t bec

ause

he

has s

o m

uch

prac

tice

reac

hing

for i

tem

s in

high

pla

ces?

Has

he

inhe

rited

his

abili

ty

to re

ach

item

s on

the

top

shel

f? E

xpla

in y

our a

nsw

er.

____

_ Ex

ampl

es o

f inh

erite

d tr

aits

are

___

____

____

____

____

_ an

d __

____

____

____

____

__.

20MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

Assessmen

tItemTy

pesandLevelsofK

nowledge

Type

sofAssessm

ent

Items

LevelsofK

nowledge

Score2.0(sim

pleC

ontent)

Score3.0(atthe

levelof

thestandard)

Score4.0(com

plex

conten

t)Basickno

wledgeandskills

thatstudentshavelearned

durin

gtheinstructionalu

nit—

fairlyeasy

Morecomplexkno

wledgeand

skillsthatstudentshave

learneddu

ringthe

instructionalu

nit—

doableif

stud

ents

participatedin

classroom

instructional

lesson

sandactivities

Inferencesora

pplicationsthat

gobeyon

dwhattheywere

explicitlytaught—

challenging

Selected

Respon

seIte

ms

Shortitemswith

asm

all

numberofcorrectrespo

nses;

optio

nsareofte

ninclu

ded(fo

rexam

ple,m

ultip

lecho

ice,

matching,ordering,true/false,

fill-in-the-blank,m

ultip

le

respon

se[asksfo

rtwoor

morecorrectansw

ers])

Constru

cted

Respon

seItemsthatrequireth

econstructio

nofoneto

afe

wsentences

(scorin

gguidancerequired)

Essay/Extend

edRe

spon

seLongerwrittenrespon

seofseveralparagraph

s;coversm

ore

inform

ationandoftenrequ

iresstud

entstoconn

ect,analyze,or

applyinform

ation;usuallyrequiresstud

entstousemultip

le

levelsofkno

wledge(scorin

gguidancerequired)

Person

alCo

mmun

icatio

nSpokenversio

nofselectedrespon

seitemsorsh

ortw

rittenrespon

ses;longerspo

kenitemssuch

asquestion-and-answ

ersessio

nsorstructureddiscussio

n(scorin

gguidancerequired)

Perfo

rmanceTa

skRequ

iresstud

entstodemon

stratethattheyhavem

astered

specificskillsa

ndcom

petenciesbyperform

ingorprodu

cing

something(scoringguidancerequired)

21MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

22

Example ItemsLearning Goal: Reproduction and Heredity

Score 2.0Matcheachvocabularytermwiththeanswerthatbestdescribesitbywritingtheletterofthecorrectanswernexttoitscorrespondingvocabularyterm.Therearemoreanswersthantherearevocabularyterms,soyouwon’tfindatermforeveryanswer.

(a) Theprocessthatresultsinanoffspringthatisanexactcopyoftheoneparent_____heredity(b) Theproductofthereproductiveprocessofananimalorplant(c) Theprocessofpassinginstructionsforspecifyingtraitsfromonegenerationtoanother_____offspring(d) Theprocessthatinvolvesamaleandfemaleparent(e) Theproductofasexualreproduction _____sexualreproduction(f) Theelementofacellthatcarriesasingleunitofinformation(g) Theproductofacelldividing(h) Theelementofacellthatallowsthecelltosplit _____asexualreproduction(i) Thecontributionofthemaleinthereproductiveprocess(j) Thepartofthecellthathousesthechromosomes _____gene(k) Thetypeofreproductionusedbyallanimalsandallformsofbacteria

Score3.0Whichofthefollowingbestexplainswhatwouldhappentoafieldoffloweringplantsifmostoftheinsectsandbirdsthatvisitedthefieldsuddenlydiedoutandnootherinsectsorbirdsreplacedthem?Whenyouhaveselectedyouranswer,explainwhatisincorrectabouteachoftheanswersyoudidnotselect.

(a) Theplantswouldalldiesoutbecausethebirdsandinsectsleavefertilizerthatmakestheplantsgrow.(b) Theplantswouldn’tbeaffectedtoomuchbecausetheycanlivewithoutbirdsandinsects.(c) Theplantswouldalldiebecauseinsectsandbirdshelptheplantsreproducesexually.(d) Theplantswouldalldiebecausetheinsectsandbirdshelptheplantsreproduceasexually.(e) Somebutnotalloftheplantswoulddiebecausetheinsectsandbirdshelptheplantsreproducesexually.(f) Somebutnotalloftheplantswoulddiebecausetheinsectsandbirdshelptheplansreproduceasexually.

Score4.0Explainthedifferencesbetweeninheritedtraitsandthosethatarecausedbyenvironment.Thenlistsometraitsyouhavethatareinheritedandsomethatarecausedbyenvironment.Finally,explainwhyyouthinkyourbehaviorisaffectedmorebyyourinheritedtraitsoryourenvironmentaltraits.

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

223

SelectedResponseMultipleChoiceItems

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

224

MatchingSets&OrderingItems

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

225

True/FalseandFill-in-the-BlankItems

NOTES:

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

226

ConstructedResponseItemsandPerformanceTasks

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

UsingResponseCodestoScoreCommonAssessmentsWiththisapproach,eachstudent’sresponseoneachitemiscodedascorrect,partiallycorrect,orincorrect,asopposedtoassigningpointstoeachitem.Afterscoringindividualitems,theteacherdeterminesthepatternofresponsesandassignsascoreaccordingly.Forexample,ifastudent’sanswersarecorrectonallitemsofthescore2.0sectionofthetest,partiallycorrectontwoitemsofthescore3.0sectionofthetestandcorrectonthethirditemofthescore3.0section,andincorrectonthetwoitemsofthescore4.0sectionofthetest,thatstudentwouldreceiveascore2.5.

Section ItemNumberCorrect,Partially

Correct,orIncorrect?

SectionPattern

Score2.0 1 C

CORRECT2 C3 C4 C5 C

Score3.0 6 PCPARTIALLYCORRECT7 C

8 PCScore4.0 9 I INCORRECT10 I

OVERALLSCORE 2.5Itisimportanttonotethatiftheassessmentaddressesmorethanoneproficiencyscale,studentswillreceiveonescoreperscale,ratherthanoneoverallscore.Thatis,ifanassessmentincludesitemsthatcovertwodifferenttopicsandwasdesignedusingtwoproficiencyscales,astudentmightreceiveanoverallscoreof2.5foronetopicandanoverallscoreof3.0forthesecondtopic.Theteacherdoesnotassignanoverallscorefortheentiretest.

27MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

28

EastHighSchoolCommonAssessmentResults

ClassroomResultsBiologyTeacherA PercentProficient

#1: 70%

#2: 90%#3: 60%

BiologyTeacherB PercentProficient#1: 75%#2: 88%#3: 52%

BiologyTeacherC PercentProficient#1: 65%#2: 85%#3: 50%

BiologyTeacherD PercentProficient#1: 72%#2: 75%#3: 45%

EastHighSchoolCommonAssessmentResults– BiologyTeacherA

Item1 Item2 Item3 Item4 Item5 Item6 Item7 Item8 Item9Student1 Y Y N Y Y N N N NStudent2 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N YStudent3 Y Y Y Y N Y Y N YStudent4 N N N N Y Y N N NStudent5 N Y Y Y N Y Y Y YStudent6 Y N Y Y Y Y N Y NStudent7 Y Y N Y Y N Y N YStudent8 N Y Y N Y Y Y Y YStudent9 Y N N Y Y Y Y N NStudent10 N Y Y Y N Y Y Y YStudent11 Y N Y Y Y Y Y N YStudent12 Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y NStudent13 N Y Y N Y Y Y Y NStudent14 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N YStudent15 N N N Y Y Y Y N YStudent16 N Y Y Y N Y N N NStudent17 Y Y Y Y N Y Y N YStudent18 N N Y Y Y Y Y N NStudent19 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YStudent20 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y NStudent21 N Y Y Y Y Y N N NPERCENTCORRECT 57% 71% 76% 85% 76% 90% 71% 38% 52%

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

CommonAssessmentDiscussionQuestions

1)Onwhichpartsoftheassessmentdidstudentsperformwell?

2)Onwhichpartsoftheassessmentdidstudentsstruggle?

3)Werethereanypatternsevidentinthestudentresponsesthatweneedtodiscussasateam?

4)Doestheassessmentneedrevising?Whichitems?Why?

5)Whichstudentsareinneedofspecialattention?

Wediscusstheresultsofassessmentswithinthecollaborativeteam.

29

Quality Criteria for Classroom

Assessments

1. Assessmentsarevalid.Theassessmentmeasureswhatis intendedtobemeasured.Itproducesaccurateandtruthfulresults.

2. Scoringisconsistent orreliable.Theassessmentproducesbelievableresultsthatmirrorthelearningthathasoccurred.Consistentresultsaregleanedacrossmultipleusersofthetool.

3. Assessmentsandsurroundingprocesses arefair.-Theleveloftheassessmentisappropriate.-Studentshavereceivedadequateopportunitytolearn.-Theassessmentisfreefrombiasandtheformatdoesnotinterferewithstudentsengagingintheassessment.

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

30

!!! !! !! !

!!!

Assessment'Review'Checklist'''

Review'Criteria'Yes' No' Item'#s'

Needing'Revision'

'Comments'

The!assessment!measures!the!knowledge!and!skills!described!in!the!standard.!!!

! ! ! !

The!assessment!is!free!from!bias.!!!!

! ! ! !

The!assessment!is!written!at!the!developmentally!appropriate!level!and!correct!readability!level.!!

! ! ! !

Assessment!items!follow!guidelines!and!are!clearly!written.!!!

! ! ! !

The!Answer!Key!is!accurate!and!matches!the!assessment.!!!

! ! ! !

EVERY!item!has!an!answer.!“Answers!may!vary”!is!typically!not!acceptable.!!

! ! ! !

A!rubric!or!checklist!is!provided,!if!needed.!!!!

! ! ! !

Directions!are!present,!and!are!clear!and!concise.!!!

! ! ! !

The!“Materials!Needed”!list!is!accurate!and!complete.!!!

! ! ! !

!

Assessment'Review'Checklist'Content'Area'___________'

Grade'Level/Course'and'Standard(s)'___________''

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

31

ProficiencyScale

MeasurementTopic Standards

MakingClaimsandSupportingWith

Evidence

RL.8.1Citethetextualevidencethatmoststronglysupportsananalysisofwhatthetextsaysexplicitlyaswellasinferencesdrawnfromthetext.RI.8.1Citethetextualevidencethatmoststronglysupportsananalysisofwhatthetextsaysexplicitlyaswellasinferencesdrawnfromthetext.W.8.1.aIntroduceclaim(s),acknowledgeanddistinguishtheclaim(s)fromalternateoropposingclaims,andorganizethereasonsandevidencelogically.W.8.1.bSupportclaim(s)withlogicalreasoningandrelevantevidence,usingaccurate,crediblesourcesanddemonstratinganunderstandingofthetopicortext.

4.0 • Identifytwocompetingclaimsaboutatext,supporteachwithtextualevidence,anddecidewhichoftheclaimsisbettersupported.

3.5 Inadditiontoscore3.0performance,partialsuccessatscore4.0content

3.0 • Makeclaimsaboutwhataspecifictextsaysexplicitlyanduserelevanttextualevidencetosupportthoseclaims.

2.5 Nomajorerrorsoromissionsregardingscore2.0content,andpartialsuccessatscore3.0content

2.0

• Understandtheconceptofaninference.• Understandtheconceptofaclaimthatissupportedbyevidence.• Understandtheconceptofevidenceexplicitinatext.• Findorrecognizeclaimsthataresupportedbytextualevidenceprovidedbytheteacher.• Findorrecognizetextualevidencetosupportclaimsprovidedbytheteacher.

EXAMPLEASSESSMENT

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

32

MAKINGANDSUPPORTINGCLAIMSASSESSMENTStandards:RL.8.1,RI.8.1,W.8.1.a,W.8.1.bPartA:Highlightthebestresponsetoeachitem.

1.Whenareadermakesaninferenceaboutatext,thatmeansthatthereaderhasnoticedsomethingthatis_________.

a.directlystated

b.indirectlyhintedat

c.explainedinafootnote

d.notpresentinthetextatall

2.Ifyouarewritinganessayaboutabookandwanttosupportyourclaimwithtextualevidence,thebestthingtodowouldbe_________.

a.citeadirectquote

b.paraphrasethetext

c.refertoaquotefromanexpert

d.eitheraorb

3.ConsiderthefollowingquotefromToKillaMockingbirdandthenselecttheclaimthatitbestsupports:“Mockingbirdsdon’tdoonethingbutmakemusicforustoenjoy.Theydon’teatuppeople’sgardens,don’tnestincorncribs,theydon’tdoonethingbutsingtheirheartsoutforus.Thatwhyit’sasintokillamockingbird”(Lee,1960,p.119).

a.Childrenareoftensmarterthanadultsexpect.

b.Punishinginnocentpeopleiswrong.

c.Someanimalsarepests.

d.Alwaysstandupforwhatyoubelievein.

4.ConsiderthefollowingclaimaboutToKillaMockingbirdandselectthequotethatbestsupportsit:InMaycomb,beingmasculineormanlymeansbeingphysicallyable.

a.“ForsomereasonDillhadstartedcryingandcouldn’tstop;quietlyatfirst,thenhissobswereheardbyseveralpeopleinthebalcony”(Lee,1960,p.265).

b.“Jemgrabbedhisleftwristandmyrightwrist,IgrabbedmyleftwristandJem’srightwrist,wecrouched,andDillsatonoursaddle.Weraisedhimandhecaughtthewindowsill”(Lee,1960,p.70).

c.“Jemwasscarlet.Ipulledathissleeve,andwewerefollowedupthesidewalkbyaphilippiconourfamily’smoraldegeneration,themajorpremiseofwhichwasthathalftheFincheswereintheasylumanyway,butifourmotherwerelivingwewouldnothavecometosuchastate”(Lee,1960,136).

d.“Ourfatherdidn’tdoanything…..Atticusdidnotdriveadump-truckforthecounty,hewasnotthesheriff,hedidnotfarm,workinagarage,ordoanythingthatcouldpossiblyarousetheadmirationofanyone”(Lee,1960,p.118).

MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

5.ConsiderthefollowingclaimaboutToKillaMockingbirdandselectthequotethatbestsupportsit:Womeninthestoryaretypicallypoliteontheoutsidebutcruelunderneath.

a.“Iwonderedattheworldofwomen…..Imustsoonenterthisworld,whereonitssurfacefragrantladiesrockedslowly,fannedgently,anddrankcoolwater.ButIwasmoreathomeinmyfather’sworld.PeoplelikeMr.HeckTatedidnottrapyouwithinnocentquestionstomakefunofyou;evenJemwasnothighlycriticalunlessyousaidsomethingstupid”(Lee,1960,pp.312–313).

b.“Ifeltthestarchedwallsofapinkcottonpenitentiaryclosinginonme,andforthesecondtimeinmylifeIthoughtofrunningaway”(Lee,1960,p.182).

c.“WhenwearrivedattheLanding,AuntAlexandrakissedUncleJack,FranciskissedUncleJack,UncleJimmyshookhandssilentlywithUncleJack”(Lee,1960,p.107).

d.“MissCarolinewasnomorethantwenty-one.Shehadbrightauburnhair,pinkcheeks,andworecrimsonfingernailpolish.Shealsoworehigh-heeledpumpsandared-and-white-stripeddress.Shelookedandsmelledlikeapeppermintdrop”(Lee,1960,p.21).PartB:Craftaresponsetoeachitem.Selectafonttooff-setyourresponsefromtheitemtext.1.ExaminethefollowingthreequotesfromToKillaMockingbirdandmakeaclaimthatissupportedbyallthree.Then,explainhoweachquotesupportsyourclaim.

“MissCarolineseemedunawarethattheragged,denim-shirtedandfloursack-skirtedfirstgrade,mostofwhomhadchoppedcottonandfedhogsfromthetimetheywereabletowalk,wereimmunetoimaginativeliterature”(Lee,1960,p.22). “InMaycomb,ifonewentforawalkwithnodefinitepurposeinmind,itwascorrecttobelieveone’smindincapableofdefinitepurpose”(Lee,1960,p.199). “[Atticus]didnotdothethingsourschoolmates’fathersdid:heneverwenthunting,hedidnotplaypokerorfishordrinkorsmoke.Hesatinthelivingroomandread”(Lee,1960,p.118).2.MakeaclaimaboutthewaymostcitizensofMaycombtreatchildrenandthewayAtticustreatschildren.Findatleasttwopiecesoftextualevidencetosupportyourclaim.3.MakeaclaimaboutathemeorpointthatHarperLeeconveysthroughthestoryofTomRobinson’sarrestandtrial.Useatleastthreepiecesoftextualevidencetosupportyourclaim.PartC:Craftaresponsetothisitem.Selectafonttooff-setyourresponsefromtheitemtext.Maketwoopposingclaimsaboutatheme,character,relationship,orothersituationinToKillaMockingbird.Supporteachclaimwithatleasttwopiecesoftextualevidenceandthenexplainwhichclaimisbettersupported.

33MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

34MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

WRI

TING

Argu

men

tativ

e

Grad

e 8

Scor

e 4.0

In ad

ditio

n to

scor

e 3.0

perfo

rman

ce, t

he st

uden

t dem

onst

rate

s in-

dept

h in

fere

nces

and

appl

icatio

ns th

at g

o be

yond

wha

t wa

s tau

ght.

Sc

ore 3

.5

In ad

dition

to sc

ore

3.0 pe

rform

ance

, par

tial s

ucce

ss a

t sco

re 4

.0 co

nten

t

Scor

e 3.0

The s

tude

nt w

ill wr

ite g

rade

-app

ropr

iate a

rgum

ents

to su

ppor

t clai

ms w

ith cl

ear r

easo

ns an

d re

levan

t evid

ence

(W.8.

1)

Sa

mpl

e Act

ivitie

s:

Stud

ents

resp

ond

indep

ende

ntly t

o the

prom

pt,

using

a ru

bric

outlin

ing e

xpec

tation

s.

Budg

et cu

ts ar

e for

cing

your

scho

ol to

drop

eith

er

the ad

vanc

ed b

and

class

es or

stre

ngth

and

cond

itionin

g cla

sses

. You

hav

e clo

se fr

iends

in

both

prog

rams

. Write

an a

rgum

ent s

uppo

rting

a de

cision

on w

hich c

lass t

o sto

p off

ering

.

Sc

ore 2

.5

No m

ajor e

rrors

or o

miss

ions r

egar

ding s

core

2.0 c

onten

t, an

d pa

rtial

succ

ess a

t sco

re 3

.0 co

ntent

Scor

e 2.0

The s

tude

nt w

ill re

cogn

ize o

r rec

all sp

ecifi

c voc

abul

ary,

such

as:

• arg

umen

t, cla

im, c

onclu

ding s

tatem

ent,

credib

le, e

viden

ce, r

easo

ning,

sour

ce, s

uppo

rt

The s

tude

nt w

ill pe

rform

bas

ic pr

oces

ses,

such

as:

• ide

ntify

the

char

acte

ristic

s of a

mod

el ar

gum

ent c

ompo

sition

• w

rite

argu

men

ts us

ing a

teac

her-p

rovid

ed te

mplat

e

Sam

ple A

ctivi

ties:

Af

ter th

e cla

ss re

ads a

nd di

scus

ses m

edica

l ev

idenc

e tha

t dea

ls wi

th fa

ctors

of st

uden

t su

cces

s inc

luding

num

ber o

f hou

rs of

slee

p. Us

ing

a tem

plate

for a

n ar

gume

ntativ

e pap

er, s

tuden

ts re

spon

d to t

he pr

ompt:

Writ

e a le

tter t

o you

pa

rents

argu

ing e

ither

for o

r aga

inst th

eir de

cision

to

enf

orce

a 9

o’cl

ock b

edtim

e du

ring

the

scho

ol ye

ar.

Sc

ore 1

.5

Partia

l suc

cess

at sc

ore

2.0 co

ntent,

and m

ajor e

rrors

or o

miss

ions r

egar

ding

scor

e 3.0

cont

ent

Scor

e 1.0

With

help

, par

tial s

ucce

ss at

scor

e 2.0

cont

ent a

nd sc

ore 3

.0 co

nten

t

Sc

ore 0

.5

With

help,

parti

al su

cces

s at s

core

2.0

cont

ent b

ut no

t at s

core

3.0

cont

ent

Scor

e 0.0

Even

with

help

, no

succ

ess

35MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

Argumentative Writing Scoring Rubric Score Statement of

Purpose/Focus Organization Elaboration of Evidence

Language and Vocabulary Conventions

4

The response is fully sustained and consistently and purposefully focused: • Claim is clearly stated,

focused and strongly maintained

• Claim is introduced and communicated clearly within the context

The response has a clear and effective organizational structure creating unity and completeness: • Effective, consistent use

of a variety of transitional strategies

• Logical progression of ideas from beginning to end

• Effective introduction and conclusion for audience and purpose

• Strong connections among ideas, with some syntactic variety

The response provides thorough and convincing support/evidence for the writer’s claim that includes the effective use of sources, facts, and details. The response achieves substantial depth that is specific and relevant: • Use of evidence from

sources is smoothly integrated, comprehensive, relevant, and concrete

• Effective use of a variety of elaborative techniques

The response clearly and effectively expresses ideas, using precise language: • Use of academic and

domain-specific vocabulary is clearly appropriate for the audience and purpose

The response demonstrates a strong command of conventions: • Few, if any, errors are

present in usage and sentence formation

• Effective and consistent use of punctuation, capitalization, and spelling

3

The response is adequately sustained and generally focused: • Claim is clear and for the

most part maintained, though some loosely related material may be present

• Context provided for the claim is adequate

The response has an evident organizational structure and a sense of completeness, though there may be minor flaws and some ideas may be loosely connected: • Adequate use of

transitional strategies with some variety

• Adequate progression of ideas from beginning to end

• Adequate introduction and conclusion

• Adequate, if slightly inconsistent, connection among ideas

The response provides adequate support/evidence for writer’s claim that includes the use of sources, facts, and details. The response achieves some depth and specificity but is predominantly general: • Some evidence from

sources is integrated, though citations may be general or imprecise

• Adequate use of some elaborative techniques

The response adequately expresses ideas, employing a mix of precise with more general language: • Use of domain-specific

vocabulary is generally appropriate for the audience and purpose

The response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions: • Some errors in usage and

sentence formation may be present, but no systematic pattern of errors is displayed

• Adequate use of punctuation, capitalization, and spelling

2

The response is somewhat sustained and may have a minor drift in focus: • May be clearly focused

on the claim, but is insufficiently sustained

• Claim on the issue may be somewhat unclear and unfocused

The response has an inconsistent organizational structure, and flaws are evident: • Inconsistent use of basic

transitional strategies with little variety

• Uneven progression of ideas from beginning to end

• Conclusion and introduction, if present, are weak

• Weak connection among ideas

The response provides uneven, cursory support/evidence for the writer’s claim that includes partial or uneven use of sources, facts, and details, and achieves little depth: • Evidence from sources is

weakly integrated, and citations, if present, are uneven

• Weak or uneven use of elaborative techniques

The response expresses ideas unevenly, using simplistic language: • Use of domain-specific

vocabulary may at times be inappropriate for the audience and purpose

1

The response may be related to the purpose but may offer little relevant detail: • May be very brief • May have a major drift • Claim may be confusing

or ambiguous

The response has little or no discernible organizational structure: • Few or no transitional

strategies are evident • Frequent extraneous

ideas may intrude

The response provides minimal support/evidence for the writer’s claim that includes little or no use of sources, facts, and details: • Use of evidence from

sources is minimal, absent, in error, or irrelevant

The response expression of ideas is vague, lacks clarity, or is confusing: • Uses little language or

domain-specific vocabulary

• May have little sense of audience and purpose

Session'Reflection'Sheet''

'!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!

!36MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com

37

!

A

B C D E F

G

H I J K L

M

N O P Q R

S

T U V W X

Y

Z

38MarzanoResearch2017wmarzanoresearch.com