Approaches to Evaluating Teachers

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Approaches to Evaluating Teachers

    1/2

    Approaches to Evaluating

    Important Definitions and SpecificationsEvaluating teachers can be approached from three different but relatedangles: measurement of inputs, processes, and outputs. Inputs are what ateacher brings to his or her position, generally measured as teacherbackground, beliefs, expectations, experience, pedagogical and contentknowledge, certification and licensure, and educational attainment. Thesemeasures are sometimes discussed in the literature as teacher quality;for instance, the NCLB requirement for highly qualified teachers refersspecifically to teacher qualifications and credentials. Processes, on theother hand, refers to the interaction that occurs in a classroom betweenteachers and students. It also may include a teachers professionalactivities within the larger school and community, but for the purposes of

    this research synthesis, classroom processes are the focus. Outputsrepresent the results of classroom processes, such as impact on studentachievement, graduation rates, student behavior, engagement, attitudes,and social-emotional well-being. Other outcomes may involvecontributions to the school or community in the form of taking on schoolleadership roles, educating other teachers, or strengthening relationshipswith parents, but again for the purposes of this research synthesis,student outcomes are the focus.Outputs can be referred to as teacher effectiveness, although asdiscussed in the following section, teacher effectiveness as used in theresearch literature is often limited to mean impact on student

    achievement specifically.Defining Teacher EffectivenessClarifying the way teacher effectiveness is defined is important for twomain reasons. First, what is measured is a reflection of what is valued, andas a corollary, what is measured is valued.Definitions nominate and shape what needs to be measured. If, forexample, policy conversations revolve around scores from standardizedtests, the significant outcomes can be narrowed to those that can bemeasured with standardized test scores. On the other hand, when policyconversations concern the interactions between teachers and students,

    the focus shifts to classrooms and documenting effective interactionsamong teachers and their students. In addition, different definitions leadto different policy solutions. When the conversation focuses on teacherquality, the discussion likely turns to improving teachers scores onmeasures of knowledge or on signals of that knowledge, such ascertification. When classroom processes are discussed, particularpractices or approaches to teaching become the focus.Given the importance of these distinctions, this research synthesis usesthe term teacher effectiveness but does so with a much broader definitionthan is typically associated with that term in current policy conversations.In the remainder of this section, a more nuanced definition ofteacher

    effectiveness is provided; this definition includes the varied roles teachersplay as well as the varied student outcomes education stakeholders value.

  • 7/30/2019 Approaches to Evaluating Teachers

    2/2