ANNUAL REPORT OFTHE HUMANITARIAN/RESIDENT COORDINATORON THE USE OF CERF GRANTS

CountryHumanitarian / ResidentCoordinator ;

Reporting Period

Sri Lanka

Neil Bunhe

01/01/2007 to 31/12/2007

I. Executive Summary / Background

Sri Lanka has been embroiled in a civil conflict between the Government of Sri Lanka (GoSL) and theLiberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) since 1983. It is estimated that the conflict has killed morethan 70,000 people; displaced over 700,000; and detrimentally affected the entire population,particularly in the North and East of Sri Lanka.

After a lull in the long-running civil conflict during the post-Tsunami period, renewed fighting ignited InApril 2006. The political and security situation continued to deteriorate in 2007 with regular hostilitiestaking place in 8 out of 25 Sri Lanka's districts. During 2007, the country saw the highest levels ofdisplacement in five years.1

Following fighting, which lead to the closure of the main A9 route into Jaffna in August 2006, some50,000 people were displaced from their homes in Jaffna. Given the isolation of the peninsula,shortages of food and medicine quickly became acute and the ability to engage in any form oflivelihood was severely compromised. While hardship continued in Jaffna, an intensive aerialbombardment campaign made Batticaloa the next center of displacement. In mid January, the SriLankan Army (SLA) captured Vakarai, on the coastline road north of Batticaloa, after which fightingextended to the western part of the District. Intense fighting in the Spring, displaced an estimated155,000 people within the Batticaloa district alone, pushing the total number of IDPs in Sri Lanka toover 300,000.

By mid year, the Government had consolidated gains in the Trincomalee and Batticaloa Districts andafter taking the remaining stronghold of Thoppigala, declared victory in the East. With the end to openhostilities in eastern Sri Lanka, the Government quickly initiated a return process for IDPs fromVakarai and Trincomalee. A host of humanitarian and protection concerns ranging from continuedinsecurity from mines and remaining pockets of fighting; inadequate shelter and food provisions;limited access to water supply and basic services; and severely restricted livelihood opportunitieswere associated with the returns. At the same time, paramilitary activities - mainly attributed to theKaruna faction2 were generating widespread fear and insecurity. Activities linked to Karuna includeddisappearances, forced recruitment, extortion and theft of relief supplies.

The multiple battle fronts and moving confrontation lines in the North and the East, createdwidespread instability and significant humanitarian needs throughout the year. The Jaffna peninsulacontinued to suffer severe shortages of food and basic supplies due to the closure of the main north-south road onto the peninsula. Access for staff and humanitarian supplies first to Jaffna then to theLTTE-controlled areas in the East, was periodically restricted or blocked. Strict controls on theimportation of construction materials to affected districts created additional difficulties in programmeimplementation.

To address urgent needs of populations, the UN Country Team appealed for CERF funding on 2separate occasions in 2007. The first CERF request was made in February 2007 and focused bothon the large-scale displacement in eastern Sri Lanka and the urgent needs for the population

1 301,764 in April 2007, Ministry of Nation Building and UNHCR statistics2 Colonel Karuna broke away from the LTTE in 2004 and established the TMVP (Tamil Makkal Viduthaiai Pulikal), based inBatticaloa, which functioned as a paramilitary force.6 Each unit is comprised of 4 toilets.

displaced in Jaffna at the end of 2006. Sectors covered by the February/March allocation includedprotection, shelter, water and sanitation, health, food, agriculture and security and totaled US$9,313,444. A second, smaller allocation in the amount of US$ 1,942,952 was granted in September2007 and provided urgently needed funds to address protection, shelter and food security needsassociated both with the rapidly evolving return process in the East. In addition to the two 2007CERF requests, funding approved in 2006 for air service operation was allocated in January 2007.

To address severe food shortages in the North and to avert a crisis during the escalating conflict inthe East, food assistance for IDPs and other vulnerable groups was a priority for the Spring 2007application. Food assessments indicated that in many of the conflict-affected areas, virtually theentire population's food security was compromised due to displacement, severe disruption oflivelihoods and drastic price increases. Severely limited access to seeds and fertilizers and theconsequent harvest reduction, made farmers particularly vulnerable. In addition, a ban on deep-seafishing combined with the inability to access outside markets, further compromised food security forthousands dependent of fishing livelihoods.

While food assistance was needed to address the most pressing food needs during displacement, ashortage of quality crop seeds, pesticides and fertilizers combined with drought conditions in theNorth also threatened longer-term food security. Further, agricultural and livestock activities in Jaffnahad been compromised by a cash flow deficits, over-use of natural resources and insufficient suppliesof veterinary drugs and vaccines. Support to resume local food production for the Yala plantingseason in April assisted in reducing large-scale dependency on unsustainable levels of food aid forpopulations displaced at the end of 2006. Similarly, time-critical inputs to meet the second plantingseason were important in addressing food security for over 100,000 people returning to their homesin Batticaloa and Trincomalee during the second half of the year.

Shelter was also a priority concern throughout the different phases of conflict during 2007, first toensure adequate shelter for IDPs in Jaffna, then, to provide temporary shelter as fighting escalated inBatticaloa and later as returns got underway in the East. CERF funds provided for the capacityneeded to prepare sites, erect shelters and address non food needs in over 200 sites. The secondround of funding also supported urgent repairs and refurbishment of welfare centers prior to the year-end monsoon, averting potential health risks associated with inadequate shelter.

As in the shelter sector, multiple displacements placed considerable strain on existing water andsanitation services for displaced and hosting communities in the North and East. The need for urgentwater and situation intervention was particularly acute during the height of displacement in Marchwhen many IDP locations were congested and the risk of diseases such as diarrheas, hepatitis,dengue, chickengunya, leptospirosis and rabies, etc. was particularly high. CERF resources wereused to establish safe water sources, build washing facilities, construct latrines and supportcommunity managed drainage and solid waste disposal systems.

Complementary health interventions were also a important during the first part of the year. Healthpriorities focused on reducing the risk of communicable diseases outbreaks and addressingimmediate public and reproductive health needs of vulnerable displaced and isolated communities inBatticaloa and Trincomalee as well as critical needs in Kilinochchi, Mannar and Vavuniya. Mobileclinics, provision of essential drugs, supplies and bed nets, combined with health awarenesscampaigns formed the main health inputs.

Access constraints combined with the volatile security environment created significant constraints formovement of staff and goods and also increased safety concerns for humanitarian workers. Giventhe ongoing closure of land access to Jaffna, funds approved in 2006 but allocated in January 2007supported air services to transport relief supplies as well as humanitarian workers. UN HumanitarianAir Service (UNHAS) was'also available to facilitate assessments and undertake medical/securityevacuations as required. The first flight from Colombo to Jaffna was on 4th January 2007 andcontinued on a bi-weekly basis through March 2007, flying 436 passengers and 56 metric tonnes ofhumanitarian cargo moved between Colombo and Jaffna. February CERF funds also provided forincreased security capacity to reinforce civil-military coordination with the government, train field staff,and analyze and report on the security situation.

' 1 1Total amount of humanitarianfunding required and received,(per reporting year) j

,\j '

!.Total amount of CERF fundreceived by funding window

1 1 t

i

Totalfuncliragencand t(to inrif

, ' </

i

'L

amount of CEig for direct iy/IOM implementatiJtal amount forwarddementing partners

{ t

V ,

\ * »

' I

1

1'

'

ng.

' •

'*FJNoned

i

i

Required: US$ 132,740,403 (CHAP 2007)Received: US$ 1 02,208,789 (CHAP 2007)

Rapid Response: US$11,256,396(includes WFP 06 project of 368,31 1 )

Underfunded: US$ 0.00

Grand Total: US$ 11,256,396

Name of Agency

FAO (Agriculture)

FAO (Agriculture)

UNHCR (Protection)

UNHCR(Protection)

UNHCR (Shelter)

UNHCR (Shelter)

UNDP (Agriculture)

WHO (Health)

UNFPA (Health)

UNDSS (Security)

WFP - UNHAS (Jan07') (Air Services)WFP (Food)

UNICEF (WASH)Sub Total

Total UNagencies/IOM

Amount Funded( Feb. / March)

500,000

1,207,625

1,512,500

752,210

250,000

209,955

368,311

3,323,735

1,189,108

US $ 9,313,444

Amount Funded(August)465,519

680,000

560,000

237,433

US$1, 942,952

US$ 11,256,396

Note: The arand total must eaualallocated.

Approximate total number of.beneficiaries reached withCERF } funding (disaggregatedby sex/age if possible) |

t ' ,' ji . !! ' 1

Geographic areas \ ofimplementation ' .

TotalFAO 30,480FAO 20,000UNHCR 41,000UNHCR 92,000WHO 310,000WFP 420,000UNICEF 42,840

under 5 years ofage

Children 30,000Children 140,000

the total CERF funding

Female (If Male (Ifavailable) available)

84,000 196,000136,000 144,000

Batticaloa, Trincomalee, Ampara, Vavuniya, Mannar, Kilinochchi,Mulaitivu & Jaffna

II. Coordination and Partnership-building

(a) Decision-making process to decide allocation: As the situation continued to deteriorateduring the first months of 2007, the Resident/Humanitarian Coordinator, with the support ofOCHA, led a process to review priorities to respond to the most critical needs of populationsin the North displaced at the end of 2006 as well as in the East, where fighting wasdisplacing tens of thousands of people and creating urgent life-threatening needs there. Withsupport from sector leads, which facilitated the initial Common Humanitarian Action Plan(CHAP) in September 2006, priorities were identified in protection, shelter, WASH, food,health, agriculture, security and logistics. Both local and international NGOs were includedin the process as members of the sectors.

(b) Coordination amongst the humanitarian country team: Priorities were identified throughthe Inter-agency Standing Committee (IASC) coordination framework, which includesinteragency and sector coordination between UN, NGO and donors. Strong linkagesbetween the IASC and Government-led Consultative Committee on Humanitarian Affairs(CCHA) facilitated wider collaboration with Government authorities, as well as provided aforum for lobbying on key issues such as humanitarian access, safety and security andprotection of displaced populations. Several meetings, chaired by the Resident/HumanitarianCoordinator included participation from Sector Leads and heads of agencies. District-levelworking groups were proactive in identifying needs and gaps, while the IASC at the Colombo-level provided the platform for regular information sharing, lobbying efforts and decisionmaking.

(c) Partnerships: Under the guidance of Sector Leads, sector priorities were formulated withpartner agencies. At the same time, roles and responsibilities of implementing partners weredelineated to ensure effective and timely use of CERF allocations. A simple monitoringsystem was developed to keep agencies abreast of updates and developments. The inter-agency coordination framework addressed various structural problems and assisted inreducing confusion related to questions on a variety of issues including the operationalenvironment, staff workloads, adjustment of financial requirements and project deliverables.Operational challenges, often beyond the control of agencies, slowed project implementationat times, although good information sharing and joint advocacy through the IASC and theCCHA assisted to some extent, in unblocking problematic access and material constraints.

Key partnerships of the Sector Level included:

Health: WHO partnered with UNFPA, IOM, Sewalanka, and World Vision Lanka to providereliable, quality, life-saving health care services and emergency supplies to IDPs, including inmany hard-to-reach areas. CERF funds facilitated collaboration between UN agencies andNGOs and assisted in building trust between healthcare providers the IDPs and hostcommunities served.

Food: WFP worked closely with its man implementing partner, the Ministry of Nation Buildingto ensure food aid reached vulnerable communities. Strong partnership with thegovernment's district monitoring unit and multi purpose cooperative societies (MPCS)facilitated delivery and monitoring of assistance.

Protection: Monitoring, legal aid, human rights awareness raising and civil documentationwere carried out by UNHCR in collaboration with protection and shelter implementingpartners NRC, DRC, Human Rights Commission, Non Violent Piece force Sri Lanka.

WASH: UNICEF in partnership with ACTED, ASIA, ASM, IRD and SOLIDAR installedemergency latrines, provided safe water and hygiene kits, implemented camp drainageoperations.

Agriculture: UNDP and FAO together with partners including the Department of Agriculture,World Vision, Sarvodaya, Patchali Pallai, and Development Rehabilitation Organizationsupplied agricultural inputs including seeds, fertilizer and tools to conflict affected farmingfamilies in the East.

Logistics: UNHAS, in partnership with GOSL and EXPO aviation Pvt. Ltd. assistedprogramme implementations by organizing regular flights to the North & East. Guidance andsupport for UNHAS operations was provided by the interagency working group comprised of:

Security UNDSS, worked closely with the UN Resident /Humanitarian Coordinator and theUN Security Management Team (SMT) to assess and mitigate safety and security.

(d) Prioritization process: Priorities were agreed first through IASC sector working groups andsubsequently through additional consultation with the UNCT. OCHA provided technicalguidance on the use of CERF and its linkage to CHAP. Projects addressing immediate lifesaving needs were prioritized (protection, shelter, health, water and sanitation). Given largescale food dependency and windows of opportunity with the Yala planting season in April andMaha in September, agriculture inputs to improve food security were prioritized during bothCERF rounds. Common services in particular security and air transport, essential to supportthe delivery of humanitarian assistance were also given due consideration.

III. Implementation and Results

Rapid Response projects

"* How did CERF funding enable prompt, early action to respond to life-saving needs andtime critical requirements? Please explain briefly.

Sri Lanka received CERF funds through the rapid response window. These funds facilitated thestart-up of critical activities and life-saving services to conflict-affected populations while alsoaddressing food self-reliance during the critical planting seasons in the Spring and the Fall.CERF funding assisted in kick-starting priority CHAP projects, in particular those with a time-critical window of operation, including in the protection, shelter, health, water and sanitationsectors. Given the difficult operational environment, critical security capacity as well astransportation services were included in order to address operational limitations. Allocation ofCERF funds facilitated collaboration in most sectors, both in terms of prioritization and reinforcingoperational partnerships. Given the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian situation, CERF allowedrapid response, pending release of additional funds for other CHAP projects.

(a) How was the monitoring and evaluation of the CERF projects conducted?

Projects were monitored by the implementing agencies' programme managers and staff inboth Colombo and at the field level through regular visits to project locations. Periodicmeetings were held with sector leads and implementing agencies to discuss issues andprogress. Projects were also monitored and reported on as part of the overall CHAPprocess.

(b) How did other initiatives complement the CERF-funded projects?

Funding channeled through various UN agencies and other agencies such as ICRC, BelgiumRed Cross, Oxfam, WVI Canada, Caritas, DRC, Zoa, Care etc. Donors such as EuropeanUnion, World Bank and the Asian Development Bank also provided funding for variouscomplementary projects.

IV. Lessons learned

To support better preparation of CERF applications, increased awareness of CERF conditionsand requirements is needed. CERF missions / trainings to assist field offices in gaining hands-on experience and facilitating dialogue and understanding with the CERF Secretariat would bewelcomed. In particular, additional guidance is needed on establishing selection andperformance criteria. Awareness-raising with donors, particularly on CERF as a complementary(versus replacement) funding support would also be beneficial. Clarification is also needed onconditions and process for no-cost extensions.

The three-month implementation window was a constraint in Sri Lanka, particularly because of thevolatile security situation and its impact on project implementation. Restricted access to IDPs inLTTE-controlled areas hampered delivery and monitoring of emergency humanitarian aid in manysectors. Similarly, closure of roads, security constraints as well as strict checkpoint proceduresslowed assessments, in particular in the health sector and also made transport dispatchesproblematic. Planned air operations also encountered various problems and bureaucratic hurdles dueto the dual civilian / military nature of the Jaffna airport.

V. CERF IN ACTION

Food sector

Walking to a WFP food distribution point has been a part ofNageswaran Puvaneswary (Puvane's) routine over the last fewyears. During the daily 3 kilometer trek, Puvane and herneighbors were careful to stick to the path as the area had notbeen fully cleared of mines.

Puvane was first displaced by the tsunami in 2004 and thenagain in 2006, when the 65 year old woman fled some 60kilometers from Trincomalee to the relative safety ofBatticaloa.

Puvanes's husband is a lagoon fisherman. Before he was displaced, a good night's fishing wouldbring in up to 1500 rupees. With fishing restrictions imposed as a result of the conflict, his dailyincome was reduced to no more than 200 rupees. Although, he clearly does not want to bedependent on aid, he is grateful for the WFP food ration, which ensured that his family had twomeals a day, while they were displaced.

CERF contributions enabled WFP to provide basic foodrations to 357,339 (177,240 Male and 180,099 Female) Ibeneficiaries including IDPs, returnees and economically (fv

affected people.

During 2007, WFP distributed over 24,000 tons of foodcommodities in Kilinochchi, Mullaitivu, Jaffna, Mannar,Vavuniya, Trincomalee, Batticaloa and Ampara.

Food assistance was critical in averting hunger and improvingthe nutritional status of vulnerable groups. Thousands of/DP returnees are dependent on food

aid in eastern Sri Lanka [Photo: WFP/Kudrich]

Protection sector

UNHCR coordinates protection and shelter assistance fordisplaced families in Sri Lanka. During 2007, protectionmonitoring benefited returnees, IDPs and civilians in theEastern Province of Sri Lanka (Trincomalee, Batticaloa district),as well as in the North (Kilinochchi, Mullathivu, Mannar andVavuniya). Focus areas include facilitating freedom ofmovement, registration, security of IDPs, protection fromforcible recruitment and prevention of human rights abuses.These activities are essential to creating a secure environmentboth during displacement and upon return to places of origin.

Internally displaced people (IDP) at the Nanthuraiwelfare camp in Jaffna town [Photo: IRIN/Jones]

'm^MASSasiskaran with neighbors (UNHCR, BATTICALOA, Sri Lanka)

Shelter sector

Sri Lankan singer: from displaced personto superstar....Sasiskaran is a popular singer from EasternSri Lanka. What is extraordinary aboutSasikaran is that he not only beat 5,000others to win a nationwide talent show, butthat he was an internally displaced person(IDP) when he became a music idol.Although he has never had any formal musiceducation, the 27-year-old Sasiskaran, wonthe "Shakti TV Superstar" competitionbroadcast by a Tamil-language televisionstation last year. He has since returnedfrom Trincomalee to Batticaloa, joining anestimated 176,000 of IDPs who have goneback to their villages of origin under theGovernment-facilitated programme for theEast, which is monitored by UNHCR. He nowenjoys peace in his house in the company offamily and neighbors.

Hope and Home - In the footsteps of a returnee in Sri Lanka's conflict-affected East"It's difficult to believe that we are finally standing inside our very own house," says a smiling A. A.Mohommed, carrying his two-year-old son. "My boys will finally have a proper home." Forty year oldMohommed's relief and happiness is shared by his wife, Siththi Masaira. As she walks into their newhome with their three other sons in tow, she opens the windows to let out the warm Trincomalee airthat was trapped inside the house.

Their new home is situated in Muthunagar,an area located 15 km away fromTrincomalee town and the site of UNHCR'slatest resettlement programme in the district.Implemented by local partner the RuralDevelopment Foundation, the schemeassisted 178 families who had been livingwith host families. Mohommed's family hasnow left the ranks of an estimated 450,000people who have been forced to flee theirhomes as a result of fighting between thegovernment forces and the Liberation Tigersof Tamil Ealam (LITE) in Sri Lanka's Northand East.

Mohommad with his son (UNHCR - Muthunagar,Trincomalee, Sri Lanka)

Food and Agriculture sector

ym^ fy^mi^n^^f^/^*? ~'^iS*BE%ârôk .^w ,x^;-.

Nallathampy Rajeswary, 47, is a widow with twochildren: a daughter and a son. After herhusband was killed by unknown men and hereldest daughter died unexpectedly, she was leftto support for her remaining two young children.Although she had been able to buy a sewingmachine with the help of a local NGO, the incomeshe generated was unable to meet even the mostbaisc needs of her children.

Then the conflict forced Nallathampy to flee withher children, leaving almost all of their belongingsbehind. After temporarily seeking shelter in anIDP camp, they returned home. Dependent onlimited government assistance, with their assetsgone, they faced a bleak future. Nallathampywas identified as a beneficiary under the FAOfood security project and provided with 10 chicks,starter mash, and the training needed to startbackyard poultry rearing. 'This assistance gaveme the hope that I badly needed, after having losteverything", she said. "The training also gave meconfidence which has helped me to make themost out of this opportunity. I am now earningenough to feed my children, which is what ismost important to me."

Before the conflict, Mr. Sivanesan earned a livingfrom canoe fishing in the Batticaloa lagoon. As theconflict escalated during December 2006, he fledwith with wife and four children and sought shelterin an IDP camp.

After 7 months in the camp, they returned home,only to find all his fishing gear and boat gone. "Mywife and four children depend only on me, and Ihad no way to support and feed them. We were ina desperate situation, but I was determined not tolet them starve", he said. Identified as abeneficiary under the FAO food security project, hewas provided with maize seed and fertilizer, alongwith technical advice from the local authorities.Two and a half months after receiving theassistance, Arumugam harvested his maize. "Ireceived 15,000 Rupees from selling this maize,

Health sector

In 2007, with CERFfunding, WHO togetherwith partner, Sewa LankaFoundation provided basicmedical supplies andpublic health interventionsfor IDPs and hostcommunities in the Jaffnadistrict. This timely,systematic interventionassisted in preventingavoidable morbidity andmortality.

IDPs waiting at a mobile clinic in Jaffna district, (photo: WHO, Jaffna)

Displaced Family in Jaffna [Photo: UNICEF]

The health project benefited a total of 30,000people during the period from May to July 2007.Targeting the Jaffna district, activities includedmobile clinics providing primary health care forIDP along with health education on chikungunya,dengue, rabies and protein deficiency.

The project helped to improve water sanitationfacilities and waste management as well asvector control - in health facilities such as PointPedro, which included 575 direct and 2,350indirect beneficiaries. The project also suppliedwater to 4 welfare centres, benefiting 1,850families. In addition, trauma training for medicalstaff, youth empowerment and confidencebuilding training were provided. Medical supplieswere also provided for the Department of PDHS

WASH sector

Portable and Re-usable Toilet for Emergency Sanitation Response

In response to the escalating conflict, UNICEF Sri Lanka together with partners developed a portableand collapsible superstructure design, comprised of sections of galvanized iron piping. The structurecan be assembled in about 20 minutes. In partnership with the international NGO "ACTED", UNICEFalso developed a portable septic tank using waterproof plywood and polythene sheets to addresschallenges posed by high groundwater levels and open wells. Using this methodology, the WASHsector was able to provide sanitation facilities in camps within 24 to 72 hours.

The portable latrines were centrallymanufactured in Colombo and distributedisland-wide to 100 temporary centers fromJanuary to April 2007 and benefitedapproximately 100,000 people. This portabletoilet was easy to transport and construct andprovided culturally appropriate sanitationfacilities for a large number of people. Theadvantages of the collapsible toilets in theemergency setting included:

• They are hygienic, easy to clean and safe touse.

• The materials can withstand strong windand rain.

• The toilets are easily accessible to children,pregnant women, elderly and disabledpersons.

• Toilets are easily decommissioned and recycled without environmental damage.

In 2007, CERF funding provided for 278 portable toiletunits6 in four conflict affected districts.

Practical training sessions on the installation of theportable toilet were conducted in all the affecteddistricts.

Construction of portable toilet units took place at IDPcamp locations in Mannar-South FDL, Mannar-NorthFDL and Batticaloa Districts.

Sl Hit''-; ' ",.' rnSî' p*%ffîéxyefmp|iStè&iïiSi

IfcSïiflîïiitiSiKfhd'.?--4,"! ••;'••'iïsê-SA,MJ»W.!(kfit:;;5!p4SfeSPR

*ï«•M/î«;,^;v-*J*-;S-:^feiÉSPi«ill§&iWïSiSf' '"-'''' ''ÉliEviiîfea?;;Z'9«SflfSïiïiStîcig:ï5SKl;f»;|

fertipii, ifHS3/:pi»ril MSPS^-ï

1 1O--ïfi>iW""kv.

•p

^^ï2Kfe^MP«-O 'Tjgîi; jt-( •• -;/m'viSTïSftMvÏ.H.-ùQk'isvA,te-|®fë3lÏBiWfê,!*-E.sSssM•!p8nJJJf111ïiÉitipgISip3%^ass||i#litua»il/f' 'l fe .1 •^BtefeSj V'lj ''Hl-JtOV^yt':?

:ëlMMvVVKrf^-ïî'V'-ft

Hf«PfillilHlliljlflllilil!tlS!j;i$ !«iS*smss||S |fjift*<; ï£ïwjSM- SS-'••jv('?:X;î"-''X:-iV -î;:feaf5^!•'.,•! 'S.i'Alteïfes«piSSi-'/fï/nii

Act

ual

resu

lts a

nd im

prov

emen

ts fo

r th

e ta

rget

bene

ficia

ries

10<uft

8+-«2

o13CO0>IET30)•G(Ua.a

CD

? !2*~ ni(D X

S-e» «0.0.E

's.a'aru t. O)"s W COSô^•S ÎC CDE <5 <n3 C >,Z,SS

T3<*-> mr- Q>I S2S?0 3 COE -° 13rfW^

T3

0 !=4-* C01-^

•2,2 S52 S 's'sa « Q.-0

fe«Sim ^^o ==•

*-, i-

b^i•5 §0) en u

.a is. ^V,-^ ° "° >,<« °

ilsul il iro=|,'aogîSS8»|E»ë.ES-2-£Sow|g = "5 -S ô c œ û - o 8 ra -o E&l-SS?ag8||3«£|8- |^8g|| |g|-S |Eag -a | S oS o . g ! v j n i c D c o t S n c " ( g ^ . g w g o ) J 2 ^ E ' S e c a . - a - £ ? -c to o "£ a, o

lllïlrfilsill^lijsilisfili.lsllsiif'giSllS9iiii§lii2ll8ii|||l|èl4:iil?lll^_ i 4 2 o r o c o E 5 T - O T - a r o 5 ë c D - o E < j = < D < j z Q . o 5 b ; O T : ; - - ë 5 o c o - c - Q . Q . - < -

« • • * o « • o «

"S.— roS1 g, EX-aSv -i^S1

t- jj- m — i- coCD t g CO _. o

s -Pi HiQ = c ™ =i P ra

^ °ëo c-=.-o

c life- g S S-2 ^|g ° ^ ^S S'a S = - S S

i «l§ liiS. Isl £•?!•• * of

ïo§sQUj

.cfO ÇQ(Kgs§

oo°, <000 Q,

SQ

o§o"00CO

<* is-6 fi &9 c: v. "o ;^-fV O Q) CO

S :§ S ! 8 !a: ss g Q.W^ S S -g -a o300, Q.5 QO.

co'"GSoQ.

to

K5O.XI05No01

fi CJ

?.§

"8o

Su(n 'Ss si-53 oCD ~h3

Sig. 5>-ë'S

s,§

I g O g O l ^ Si i £ 11ilis J S a s f f l t g lll^til**(g CD ^ g-C§- « 3-3" -J

5?*3

-s a§53-§o

53i °CD Q3^ «"• oQ]

Q.

-g D) œ "Di C3" "• ~1 sSi§1o ^

CDen•aoDQ.

S1

SCL.

Sc?3

CD13Q.

Q. CD

5'S>CD S3 °S =>^ ao -*•II5" fflCD D

ïô= =:3 c7m3 m=•?t§en en

III2 (ô àS ^ Ê ?% S^^°

3"-a&B.

à S

o^

•O -iB »CD «

S: 01O 12^ Q.

"O IO CO O -i 3.3 CD O O -VCD^ o w 3 _ =raacS-ê-cS srCD C D) O CU

a S-S-gmg D CD H" ggc7S ^^«•§•§»§

ÎHP

g ^ 3 en CQ•SSH g-S1 S ? S 1Ë5-2.S-ICD O o1 o ens S s as•a -*. «. s* ffi

» ?§.S Sen co n§ 2-^|" 55Sl-ë

g.o"•o'D)

5'CD

O 17

3§Q. 3ÇU_ D)

en 3

I*cB en=r DJi 2.=> 3S.»o R13 W=• D3C ^3 °-cu co^ 03-i C»

CQ'CQ32» g3 3E.3— CD

S3

i-OK O "'*^ ^?-TD•1 M--S CUen » CD CDs S.a°-2 ° < S"L =. 3 CD ;i

'"3 Q m ^' ._ 2 3 CDi T S S S-o

55 ? .en g

§ P i 8CD ^S'

S" =iQ) Î2o r!-

O [si=t! -t^o «>i! 3en CD5" à52. ci

â«M 1?• S

Ji.

S

aen

S

QOenm=R

ooo

§• =I -s §S" Sffr:»?•§«S;5'o S

CD

Q. ^

%3S O

c ^ SCD CQ^ OCD <3 ®ë"' 3<2 CDS 3.en

S> CDCD Ofi c

B gQ. 3C CQauCD 3Q. D

^ °^•ë38*• o

il2. CDSL3en ^

Den

•ç^01oCD

CD3

<" ~-IS mco "> Oc'-g CO2 8 «o2 0. CD

HtiiCM — S- CD 15« • § « § 1— -iil r~ TÎ ^

« 0 0 »

•D

g:(D

Bsen

£= O...S§.0

litll..2 T-~ X1 E -^ fc

?s|fll§ E5 g Sen s 2£ T— CD~ IO

a §2 S

T 3 S Î 3 C O 5 5 O C Ô T ^ O Î'co °°. inV^ rrt /r\

III|^CO

s<n

8-S2 g0 fc

o>2i|CD ^(/) W

1 «5 2_ oi_ JTo cu«f= ;J2 SCD tn

2 52iz o o

•o coC C CO i

tnCDE

EO)SQ.

E

to

•a -ac cco co

o CD^— *T~1

«Sf^

CD -3

|S|2< co £ i=

o

o

<D

IQ.•acCO0coc:oa.co£•D

§0>g^mg-0£ co

and permanent houses.

constructed, in addition to 81 1 semi-perm

anent

• • • • • •

CO CD 3 U) ~Z.~<3 T 3 = ! : r n D 3 C n i — ; S > < ' > IOT3 ' O O T 3 = ; N i 3 D ) O m~° *_ m -D i 0 =• £" ? X 3 '(5' n C D o 0 3 0 ) O C D O o 3 a . C D x=• CD 2-3- <03 .3oa . tD < g.Q.g ;oo2 .3 .g :3 . - O o g c D g . —CD Sji _. c D C D ^ ô ' c i C D . - f â ^ ô c D - ^ c D s . ^ q -»i 3 .Q =î 2*.

âsa lSas -^sS i l i s s. s « ^ < <» Isur HP

•3 5 O 03 CO CD .3 CT W ô'03 M £ T3=i£ 3 > c g < 2 il ? g S» |ô - S ' 2| 5 - S a m

o â « § -§<§« l œ g â S"" ^.5P S. g.— tua C D C D = x. 5 cr ^ S ^ S z SS -a !H i.°5T3 Sa lS^ O^S-g 0 5 § ' o g <

M?* ss"l5r &f1«.8 l^â|l?§ 5-llt |? Il foil

0 0 4 • • 0

•

TAC

s by Novem

ber, 2007.

N i m ^ ^ w q o K ï a - g - c s œ ï » H " ff w E ? O Z O « C 0 g > "SJ.-^S^

Q j q m r - i - t 2 r o , x O r t - = ^ ' O i C D ^ r î ' o P ? N " ^ - : ? = i : 5 = ? ~ ' — ^ 'dCD;! ;S » 3 § S ' w S a « ' W = c > | M g ^ . f f l ( D o g = g = - o » g « D g §

Illïllell^^llllîsS^ïilKiili

|ffî!M!iI!1? tsii!ï!|p'îf 'il

8-1li|3S||5| ll||ï!|P|I êlllillî ll|Si |iililN|ïf |l|^i^l i||2g "fi- if |*i | |s a - ? »-" s. a- = s-g S a t0 5T ' " o ^ J ^ O - t o

« 500 new

shelters for IDP

s in Jaffnaconstructed, in addition to 81 1

semi-perm

anentN

ovember, 2007

a

242 transitional shelters and core houses were

- zCD o3 3°> Tl

OOQ.

COoI—6sa

v>3-fl>

CD"I

B"

O•io3Dô

to

0105,O

§

•fc.jj.

O0oD-QCn

<Z.SoTJCO>Sp

e 40,000 displaced persons receiveshelter assistance by w

ay of camp/

welfare

centre upgrades,

bythatched.

o

1,047 houses and shelters were upgraded, and

3,621 houses and shelters were repaired or re-

«

12 monthly S

GB

V w

orking group and network

meetings w

ere held in all interventional districts.

conducted.545 beneficiaries and 16 police officers w

ere 1

ofo

e co

untry

was

h th

e S

helte

rbe

twee

n U

NH

r coo

rdin

atio

n ac

ross

th>

then

ed,

prim

arily

thr

oug

inat

ion

Cel

l (p

artn

ersh

ip

W 03-J3

"55 §5 °•c j= °to « o•

>, (0

Con

stru

ctio

n of

400

eig

ht-fa

mil

emer

genc

y sh

elte

rs in

loca

tion

appr

opria

te u

nder

UN

HC

R's

•

03.. a> -cp OJQ;

Q- -5 O°r?0S t S^ C5.,.<o — 'o: &;==-o g "ï 1 §S o o=)50

1 Ito,s

S o w03 2 C•c Q.S

CO oo K

00V)CM"

"*î•

oo

1

K.OÏhi.o

08^>- o^Hr «"3 = Ë£ o oCO Z ±!

£n^

cy s

helte

rC

olom

bo b

rout

S.EE>-D0) 03E-c<D 03

i!.EH 03. 03

< E^ «=21 0

Is51is

£

emer

genc

y sh

elte

r pol

icy

Pro

cure

men

t of 1

000

light

wei

g

•

03

§-

S

-Wc(DB>o>aoS"S^

Ito

&

§£

5!fe

c S0 "F

shar

e in

form

ât!

whi

le th

e te

chi

rious

act

ors

toge

ther

to :

ke d

ecis

ion

as a

sec

tor,

§ *S« C£ ro

0

^

D)C

ed o

n ad

dres

s!be

add

ress

ed.

g gr

oup

mee

tings

focu

sc

issu

es th

at n

eede

d to

C q=•&'a

iS.£ <n

o

Co•a03a.

|?w to•O D3W3.ÇCO C> Q^^ "(n&.<2

^ 1 •Q. E «• g s ss^-§S . 03

C $ «

111

ill^^281

1— to

2s

emer

genc

y te

nts.

Up

to 2

,500

IDP

fam

ilies

have

hous

ehol

d ite

ms

they

requ

ire t

sust

ain

thei

r dis

plac

emen

t in

ase

cure

and

dig

nifie

d m

anne

r,in

clud

ing

the

abilit

y to

con

tribu

•

to0,§

§&o EO'tDT- O

c;03

isD3§to Hc ptD f>§^ S

Etu

03

t-

hous

ehol

d ne

eds

if st

ayin

g w

itlho

st fa

milie

s

en

Add

ition

al e

mer

genc

y ID

P s

ite:

iden

tifie

d, a

gree

d w

ith lo

cal

auth

oriti

es.

•

Dem

onst

rabl

e im

prov

emen

t in

•

t—ca

mp

man

agem

ent p

ract

ices

iire

latio

ns to

Sph

ere

Pro

ject

Min

imum

Sta

ndar

ds

<n

government

authorities,W

ord Vision,

Sarvodaya,

organization).« 200 sprayers are delivered to 10 C

BO

s(approx. 20 m

embers per organization).

o

200 sprayers, 20 tractors and 150 water pum

psw

ere distributed to 1 1

3 farmers' organizations

and additional 88 power sprayers are to be

delivered by mid M

arch to strengthen the pest

Co

Ç&(5" oCo 0}** 5"

CD

Organization

(FAO

), local

§§Cfl ^

"oT CD"•a ->

1-g^1M^s^M -iOl CD

3 &CD =••3 §

fa-o °? •>!

S S a -^ -^ nS O gS" Q) Co33§.CD — . o«> D S-Ï :o&3-w

Agriculture,

Food andA

griculture

•rr co cog o oM O 0g 0 0

0 Z3 g

FitCD |-

CQQ]

i.|< »

C§ Q)S CDQ)So.CD CD

CQ CD3 Sl&

CQ 3"

•

knife2,000 vegetable farm

ers and 500 maize

cultivators received one watering can (balance

500 to be distributed among further identified

beneficiaries in mid M

arch ).

«r?o'cc3

0•c:o?oK)•A

NJCo>1

0CO

^?y-p.3 CD £3-2 §

CQ t3- VJ

CD

Governm

entA

gent's Office,

Departm

ent of

• 6,400 mam

moty hoes and 6,400

bushcutting

knives are

delivered to

6,400m

ost vulnerable farming households.

•

6,400 beneficiaries (2,000 vegetable farmers,

3,900 paddy farmers, and 500 m

aize cultivators)received one m

amm

oty and one push-cutting-

agricultural activities, which is in line w

ith theusual practice am

ong farmers.

and 5% w

as saved for investment in future

for their own consum

ption, post harvest lossessurplus produce. 40 %

of the income w

as used

r-*ZTC/>"

5'oo

CD

Ol§CO

CD0}

COQ.

3coCD_

5'CQ

31

CD

1

si58

§Q.

•^o^i^ o'o'o'^oxja' OT)co-$o:ospMiiipMisiiiall f till fit'fs

§=§: 1 §^§-'§: 1^ 1°-= § a = » § a| a0)

• • «

Tig'CD tu CO =7n'S^- | i- : : :"m'"U^oîTr 5-

> I I a | -1 S, I H s g a- J 5 § ë. °Sgs-sJgSas . - ' s f j f l o f f . s - 'gto S. S S ^ r ; - , C D c 9 , ^ - C B ^ - -^CQ -j

&<£ 5 " 9 - o ï ' i o S o 2 . t ' 5 D i c O § " 'hs|i!li!|'i|Iilipgrl» | l < s - 3 ^ 5 r o s s U < -s . lS 'SS^g- iqg aa^ §a f ? ! § 5 § g % g °goi: o.C O ^ S r S c o O S P . . » - CD Mfo^cF CD• < Q ) ? C D C O O ^ M f l ) Q . O K . =c o c o S . . ! , « . Q . 9 . S J 3 C o o^Hco <m i~a ï t* Î2B lifs i

* * f •?

C D 3 ' c / 3 7 J c D t ^ ' a f r J ' - D C - ^ - < Q . c u c c 5 c o 5 ' 0 3 f l > ( : : i -D) 3 (D <0 Ç o O - j Ç U ^ ^ c - j j j - j ^ C T J c D g o z J C D

HlilS.ÏS* 1 "SiBg^sls »|ig|i|| I !»=;s"??g8 atffIf M î 'i1 ?ï?i" ^ s«III i !|Si sl?a i|»;!!!! I 4SI lip II»£g § ^ IS? 2,g^° 2.far£s. a «""s. gg-r^^ g.= |l

S S 3 2, a âcâ 03

§3

sCrCD"

riî11

International

T)oofCOZT

OJ3

Q)3Q.

COOl

H

aS$Q.

195MT

of

mixed

inorganic fertilizer

were

>(Q

0'C

cào>51:t>9oCoCo

•k.OipiCT]—Xto

§IR5>S1 oo c:C COCo CD

S!

UN

DP

, Ministry

of Agriculture

•W MCO COO CO

5%^-^013.P°3Ol CDs°-H -,

9,8£8C <D2. o.03 CO

ffm9, a

*r- ' — coCD CO_M bo

ssOl H

5aas^ij= CDoT0-C D = -O CD

^ WC?S

%%3- Q)

IQ-O co3EQ) H

a 9,

O\

TOni

cont

rol,

e fo

llow

ing

achi

evem

ents

res

ulte

d fro

m th

eco

mbi

ned

effo

rt of

FA

O a

nd U

ND

P im

plem

ent!

É

CD-SI Oc 2 *-=5 ~ <2= 0 0"y m oHoë< 2 0 £o ,-, o>«8£2 o CD*•• *= (0

?lcJg J 8"m -o oj5 s-i? « 1|£E•3 .00o "co P5eg 4= O•

Pat

chal

i Pal

lai

Dev

elop

men

tR

ehab

ilita

tion

agric

ultu

re p

roje

cts:

Sto

ck o

f ess

entia

l gra

ins

for c

onsu

mpt

ion

and

seed

s fo

r the

nex

t har

vest

sea

son

amon

g

o

plou

gh th

eir

padd

y fie

lds.

Org

aniz

atio

n(P

PD

RO

).

assi

sted

farm

ers

has

incr

ease

d.P

artic

ipat

ion

of c

omm

uniti

es in

pro

ject

impl

emen

tatio

n to

war

ds c

apac

ity b

uild

ing

has

incr

ease

d.

e

Ove

rall

coor

dina

tion

with

rel

evan

t sta

keho

lder

*

•

and

bene

ficia

ries

in a

gric

ultu

re s

ecto

r has

incr

ease

d.In

crea

sed

hom

e ga

rden

ing

and

self

suffi

cien

cyac

tiviti

es h

as c

ontri

bute

d to

war

ds d

iver

sify

ing

hous

ehol

d in

com

e an

d st

abilit

y.

a

Aw

aren

ess

and

tech

nica

l kno

wle

dge

on th

e

•

dise

ase

cont

rol.

Pla

nt c

alen

dar a

nd s

usta

inab

le fa

rmin

gpr

actic

es i

ncre

ased

.

•

. O" T3 £ _<- ro CO £>

•g § S J |8Ji s>i-| - çaTOO "§5 g oj W — ' S «J CO i- .C OJQ.

go E Ea,f0 2 Si g-^sr --o

111 1!! !!suPitu fis ïis*inu j i s o b ' a t u . Ë o — to^-tg j r c c o È ' S o ^

Itl5i:-§i| isi Sl^jlil• S g S r a c o c - c c i : c - S r o ^o ) -o ! Sjc=J3

Illlilsil SIB I s s S s t ?^•sl:-lsSl§ lisjHSllf< B « 0 - = p N n E r - E p t D o ) ' f t O t O C v l 3 < D C

glss.sfl-illglllsE^li »S?l?§5.E§§.g|?§.§.fe5si>-g|a~• * e •

O.£* •+— *n ^—

-o 1 = 2 c° » "g sam c - Q - o » H- >2S - ^ 0 3• H r o ' Û 3 0 Q ) £ 2 t S ^ cJSo- j fa, o |S S^ ro"SS-lc "SBaiil^-E's - s - o s s g i ^ » sgSigteilii-S 1 * - 8 £ -^ -I 1?iSli^flll &f5lli*l fsISi iii iiliip ii«fii§ig££i2Miiift Is?^ii5^iis!iiii5isi |i^lo-°ll!|ll2|!.||^E|§|l

ïïl^llïilli^liïl-iilll5 d 3 C O l O ~ 3 O T t o o S m ' - p C S £ U ( D S : £ ?'C> Q ) Z 3 - * t D o t , o o j 3 r ^ S ^ Q ) > ( a - K 0 v ! . ! S . S n iO «JDt - -CJJz2WTj - COt- 03>2 JD O J2 ^2-CM CQ O >• • • o •

lij ! ili.1* Igh.JIS 5 S •* c . c o f 5 o ^ £ 4 5 £ S Q.l5^c Q-^-•c "5 75 s -co -s 'eco -S^ -s §755 '5 Q §-S c< n o < D c - S * : o . S { 5 c o 5 i - S c ; o g ) o U j P S 3 §£ a . C Q . . S § r o ( D 5 i 3 ) M j § c 5 o 3 ^ e o L u o i ' 2< D C S < D C : S < B a 5 O ^m 0 5 C D O O T 3 < D C O f 7 , § < B OQ <c Q £ Ï CQ co O Cleo co co uj uj Q -=t 52-è Q lï

«0 § v_ CO C•Q ° 0 5 CD

073 § §73 SCN -C o ^-G 0§ § 1 »' % *^ 3 j~ Q- S T3

0 =S Q 0 C•C g =! J= CD

O000"oU5

^~x~06J*u.tio

£3

-»-»

"5_o*ÏZD)<

oo permitting,

regular access

for the

humanitarian organizations to operate

in, am

ong others,

priority affected

areas.

provision of predictable and, situation |G

overnment

that would

lead to the |

more

effective interaction

with

the |

•

T3

1o!CD

31—1

su

1OZT

T3

1<DQ.

CD

Q.

wCO0c••*

•§•'

0>>c:C37>00•b.

sSoco01Ol

l lggQS-lg-el§i *§?§"§• Sslll^g-H

°- o' 5- 3- oj ojo S Co "-3.0) IB OT 03

• 3

UtS'l^ï : ~ i 3^.ils"5 S^Q) O3 ~HQ.

• • • •

a l ? » | s | n ' c S < D - D S | | c n o g

pflî^^lïlll1!!^§iir »?: ir ?ff,if in i*;»!8 «Hœ^^l l t° §." S - § §M si ~P li i*!1il1' Pï îâ i?is

li»ls IM |l Illl(0=0)^0. C Q Q . C D •<«) 3 C D C D V C

• • • « •

O t o — ) < D ( t > 5 - ; 3 ^ - c i o — ( D c f g - z M i r - n•ss^g-lilâ'ss.i^SiâSf3 3 » a -" 5 s =• s i 2. a o f 3= 5- s± <§. to <• 3 a C D ^ n g - o c D ^ m ^ o2 s : p 5 o â > = c o < 3 t Q H r w £ 3 : _^ -"^ C D C g ^ t Q 1 ^ - . <!> r- CD -^ B <r>O - ^ ^ - ' ^ - 3 ™ CD x ^> ^~ 03 ~ 13 CQ ^ < CDl?: l f iast i3B&|5S§&!SSlilir Hsr?l|2;8itS ] j«^ |^ i -&s |-| S3S?l °c7 i§ |e t|| |1IS"! fill I 8|S la-

*il its « II! Il3l lltâ a î fgâ £o|S I&CS- tg S H i§

« S|^ s §1 âis § 5§ ^ " M W ai a^S" o!alâl à a lââ 8?§

CD

a.80CD

households that received backyard poultryassistance due to prce hike.

• A

ssistance was provided to a total of 7220

households, which w

as slightly lower than the

original target, due to the decreased number of

urgent request of the Provincial D

irector, 18,000poultry birds w

ere provided with various

veterinary drugs and vaccines

• D

ue to the threat of bird flu at the time, upon the

mechanism

s

chicks and 1800 bacs of feed (starter m

ash-25kg per bag) w

ere delivered to 1800beneficiary househo ds, providing them

with

alternative income ooportunity, im

proving foodsecurity and strengthening their coping

s: t>.1± C5 coQO "dCO CD

'co -c:= .!2-a S §CD JS '«> eo co2 cu .g>

E CD '1J3 CD

c 5CO '•»=

c w•S ro • w|8|SCD „ rô 2

U O Ï 3s8|sin 2 E LJJ

• o

tn

The

cov

erag

e of

em

erge

ncy

food

dis

tribu

tion

asw

ell a

s of

sup

plem

enta

ry fe

edin

g pr

ogra

mm

esav

erte

d hu

nger

and

sta

rvat

ion,

and

impr

oved

the

nutri

tiona

l st

atus

of

IDP

s an

d/or

eco

nom

ical

ly-

affe

cted

peo

ple,

par

ticul

arly

of w

omen

and

child

ren.

A).

- W

FP

pro

vide

d ba

sic

food

rat

ions

to 3

57,3

39(m

ale 1

77,2

40,

Fem

ale

180

,099

) ID

Ps,

ret

urne

e!an

d ec

onom

ical

ly a

ffect

ed p

eopl

e un

der

the

Vul

nera

ble

Gro

up F

eedi

ng (

VG

F) -

90

perc

ent o

fth

e pl

anne

d be

nefic

iarie

s.•o 4-;CD CD

=5. E>Q. .COD I—CO ***"

-aCD CD

o§!CD 2 o O js

o .2-a o ~ol^-om ~ 8>2 CD £^ D)TI10 CD 0

•st. g-sr,_-a o Sa5 o *- S•Q.2.«oIs-sSz "g S to

• •

0).C cb *-

*i*Iiupti«Sli§<: ro-Sd

1 M^ SS

• ^ -S•o le|c .. «.

I a 1 b 1 1 |'i . i | § IIll-ill lliilllM- Q.T3 CB Q> CO C CjCN)O\-St -

10CON.

co~CMCO

CO*

CNcs

^Is.O

•DOOU.

tn

- W

FP

dis

tribu

ted 2

4,19

8 to

ns o

f foo

d co

mm

oditi

e:un

der t

he V

GF

in K

ilinoc

hchi

, M

ulla

itivu

, Jaf

fna,

"co1

fem

ale

bene

ficia

rie

Man

nar,

Vav

uniy

a, T

rinco

mal

ee,

Bat

tical

oa, a

ndA

mpa

ra.

- A

lmos

t 95%

of t

hose

rec

eivi

ng V

GF

re

porte

dre

ceiv

ing

an a

dequ

ate

quan

tity

of r

atio

ns(E

mer

genc

y Fo

od S

ecur

ity A

sses

smen

tco

nduc

ted

by W

FP a

nd F

AO

200

7).

B) -

WFP

's M

ater

nal C

hild

Hea

lth a

nd N

utrit

ion

Pro

gram

me

(MC

HN

) pr

ovid

ed s

uppl

emen

tary

feed

ing

in th

e cl

inic

s to

231

,882

chi

ldre

n u

nder

five

year

s of

age

, an

d 78

,534

nur

sing

and

expe

ctan

t m

othe

rs -

115

per

cent

of t

he p

lann

edbe

nefic

iarie

s.

en

- W

FP

dis

tribu

ted

5,46

6 to

ns o

f foo

d co

mm

oditi

eun

der t

he M

CH

N in

the

abov

e-m

entio

ned

8co

nflic

t-affe

cted

dis

trict

s as

wel

l as

Pol

onna

ruw

aG

alle

, M

atar

a an

d H

amba

ntot

a.

ON

r~0}

1

&. a 3=8&i"> II&?1co Q. g §O 35 :y. 3=§-&? a 8«•f «~»-

3

interventions according to life cyclegroups

o Num

ber of outbreak of vector-bornediseases in ID

Ps cam

ps«> N

umber and the percentage of preg

wom

en having access to continuum_ :j§ §CD •"*

*Reproductive health status of w

omen w

assafeguarded by distribution of

Em

ergancy RH

saidCD

«

Access to E

mergency O

bstetric care forpregnant w

omen w

ith com

plications was

ensured by providing emergency transport

facilities.

=r"D Q.

sitpS Q_3 "•

SJa

in1.8 fp< =3.55 Q.

and attended by health agencies• N

umber and

percentage of IDP

sbenefiting from

health services and

the UN

FPA

supported areas both inT

rincomallee and B

atticaloa districts during thetim

e period of implem

entation.

CDSLf*.:r

o o•S3

1'O -A

s°~A.

"o0-NM— i.o

ItH2

3>cB"•?

11

1?

^-73£

• Num

ber of assessments conducted;

number of coordination m

eetings he

a.

•

UN

FPA

supported interventions ensured thatthere w

ere no increase of maternal deaths in

S

ICD'Co

COO

c tr» 5

^^CO ?3

through the provision of 45 permanent toilets

and 155 semi-perm

anent toilets.

•

Approxim

ately 500 IDP

families gained access

to sanitation facilities

in M

uthur, Kinniya

andT

hampalagam

am in T

rincomalee district

out in Northen B

atticaloa.

emergency toilets and daily w

ater bowsering

covering the needs of 28 camps w

ere carried•St.

• • •HC/ )cnme t " ' ^ "O ' ' ' r o ' : 5c '>Eucoz r B > - i c o 5 B > o : 2 . ~ ta a> ^ ~o ~rr,gaoi l .303g l2 .5-og3 S T F i " — f fR 0 5 ^ . oS^ — o o•a S.. D m 3 S-. D =. 5 cu CD & •& —m o T3 S'en o T 3 « < ' D 5 ' o c o r 3 . a5 T ^ S ' t U Q ) : 3 c u 1 ^ < 0 3 0 - . M-o

111 |ll|lllff|-îlis ||s|isi-ct-îioil S" l > f f §S .§gg .§«g|g 'S . ^Sœsâg^S^ IB|m ^S. m g c D g L r i M g g

§ 3 8 z i 8 ^ 8 ? 8 â g gi-.-l l - S i l < 3 S > ^ §«|5&•<' ="• *% CD 0 3'. CD O o ^ •<

âpo P à °Q.

• • • • •

< D ) C T 2 : c n ^ ; c r D a > o - A C D 3 -«•'a o ë ^" â S S s g . o § a . » gpcs a.^^ ^ISin

SIl!IliïI|i!îiI3sI1?|fSïS|-SJlf|8«i?ââ-?

ïllSϧ*5fll pl lP'

^ S t Q ^ S c o S S t n t D S " 'co-oy- . =-a J°^ g S B o w W c a S - C L w c î œ a o ^ g »

1IHÏ PW !!Il 1!ilrtl 1 1§ al!P|!

CD §•' g" « 0. T- CD g.(Q

£>COS

(Kilinochchi &

Mullaithivu districts).

Kilinochchi &

Mullaithivu districts.

CO <» or^3 r-f»

!'5-*°3

o•O

!-4.(OJ

^

-4CO.5°-j.oCO

£B -J.

!§CD OQ. 0

0o§1J3>a'

qïisSp

• 6,000 IDP

families have access to s

permanent latrines in the V

anni

CD

T*

•

Approxim

atley 4,000 IDP

families benefitted

from 300 sem

i permanent toilets constructed in

Kits

for s

afe

deliv

ery

for u

se in

bot

h cl

inic

al a

ndno

n cl

inic

al s

ettin

gs in

Trin

com

alee

and

Bat

tical

oa d

istri

cts.

CDfe w „>g CL £S Q gS o£

rgen

cy o

bst<

perc

enta

gem

enta

l hea

l

ii "sQ) CO O!

CD fe-B

s-i-il|ëCO Z £1

•

Sim

ilarly

779

new

bor

n ki

ts w

ere

dist

ribut

edam

ong

preg

nant

and

lact

atin

g m

othe

rs w

hich

guar

ante

ed t

heir

RH

hea

lth s

tatu

s du

ring

the

•-

:>.Q.Q.Din

•Ç3CCO

"ccu

Q.'DCTCD

CO"O)3"O

•Be-^•ESCO >

^ 2O Q.

•

proj

ect.

Acc

ess

to a

nten

atal

and

fam

ily p

lann

ing

serv

ices

was

ens

ured

by

supp

ortin

g co

nduc

t of

regu

lar c

linic

s du

ring

the

early

reco

very

pha

se:

80 A

NC

clin

ics,

49

FP c

linic

s an

d 60

wel

lbin

gci

incs

wer

e co

nduc

ted

whi

ch m

onito

red,

faci

litat

ed a

nd im

prov

ed p

eopl

e's

RH

sta

tus

inpr

ojec

t im

plem

ente

d ar

eas.

Acc

ess

to R

H s

ervi

ces

for r

etur

ning

pop

ulat

ions

in r

emot

e ar

eas

in B

attic

aloa

Dis

trict

was

ensu

red

by r

ehab

ilitat

ing

the

infra

stru

ctur

e of

six

Ant

enat

al C

linic

s.C

ontri

bute

d to

ens

urin

g sa

fe s

ex a

nd i

npr

even

tion

of S

TI/H

IV b

y di

strib

utio

n of

223

42

« <c *

cond

oms

in T

rinco

mal

ee.

|11

3000

affe

cted

peo

ple

got t

he R

H m

essa

gew

hich

ens

ured

the

safe

RH

beh

avio

ur.

Hen

ce,

••

ther

e w

ere

no m

ajor

out

brea

ks o

f STD

/HIV

Aid

sin

pro

ject

impl

emet

ed a

reas

dur

ing

the

impl

emen

tatio

n

«

UN

HA

S e

stab

lishe

d an

offi

ce s

pace

in C

olom

bofo

r bo

okin

g/tic

ketin

g, c

omm

unic

atio

n an

d ot

her

adm

inis

trativ

e fu

nctio

ns.

•

CD 0 Co *•' g

o a SM- fc 'C0 CO 3

-3 C

°- 13 -o gS e 8 .

- Lo

gist

ics

Col

ombo

ooki

ng/ti

ckei

1 c -Qco' 3< CD .23:0 =z §.§•=> m 45

•

^0

CO Q.•2 «O eng Crt* 01fol§11

C•5

75 -2 Sà "g '5til0 3" 3-J co «

\—t~COoo"toV)

CMCMC-JèCOo

co= t:ro o <a£ 0. <UT3 O. O*— ~1 "^0 m £0 W 0)O °3OT

The

first

flig

ht f

rom

Col

ombo

to

Jaffn

a w

as o

n4lh

Jan

uary

200

7.

Twic

e w

eekl

y fli

ghts

ope

rate

d

•

"n '=0 COtoo £••§ '1o >•c

>2 coS Ï3.S o

adm

inis

trât

(ratio

ns,

s co

mm

uni

S ai5 0 8o .b c

"11ro S O

•

,f_L toG-SCO '5<

III€ tD <N

Q.:j

g|§o .5 o

11§"tD C toQ. tu 00 43 S

5H-°«JS Ê?!S S Oto -a£ ro -5

HfS go

•sl-iÏ S a falgbis§^r.

ils"|szi)= 5= 3

CDto

o_c

O)c:E

jthor

ities

£

for f

light

s.

to g

il%%

.5c

.-§ toTO fe

M-c s

tus. sIIIa CD te^ Q.-^

tôOO

T3CCDO.IL.

CÔ"COQzr) B

etw

een

Janu

ary

and

Mar

ch

2007

, 43

6pa

ssen

gers

be

nefit

ted

from

C

olom

bo /

Jaf

fna

fligh

ts.

56

met

ric

tonn

es

of

hum

anita

rian

carg

osh

ippe

d,

allo

win

g a

rapi

d re

spon

se o

f ur

gent

e 9

t± o oo *- 2>e- co•5 fe °-•5-0

S2 ° mSG. g oà g°£%

Pic^£

I«E

.ÎS .CB CD•— "5

CD o "5§££ô S ^

9

K> 5'I?Ç2Sî?l§|p CD Q. "

m cr-a -,

I Hi

N°-£^92.cJ ~° 3 S.9} i)E3 o3. o ^S• 3 S

Q Im Sj"S•3 cî". 31

a. o °n g

«• _ m3" « ^CD -a o

O CD

S8«£° ffi.

=±

ca'

I

o a)o =;•3 =r o%*CD 03

05

-I:CD

• <nS

CO -D CO— 3 5fCT CD Q.ÏÏ O. D)

!•- aQ) CB^ cn03 g >C S -5-1

o

-o033.DCD"n

0)COCDsCDCfl

033Q.

lu Q.

S i.-:. CD 2.=±. O) OJ

|||

S^5 '2. CD

g.0- ;

Is g. S<° sa03 ^-

5- CD Q

fi/Sm ? S§!§•

31! J? -CD CD O g

i|l I5 9 S" O

CO è S Q.

â S - œ ^g'cfa

S>

CD Q. ri.CQ

v.t&

HIl||11^ oa =aE< E.S-ltJ

«1o ^

•D m 03

psCD =± CDQ. < =T.

^ci !ffg""

§11

^03 Sea§isl

S O9i S CD""• S. Q.

l§i.CD S ?

âl-o « 0

~"g c=* CD COsTcB ?

3 g2-1i-cFS £»

3OcQ.^'

CO

ooQ.cn

01

a