Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IPPJIAM・ 26
ANGULAR DEPENDENCE OF SPUTTERING YIELDS
OF MONATOMIC SOLIDS
yasumichi Yamamural), yukikazu ltikawa2) and Noriaki ltムh3)
Institute of Plasma Physics, Nagoya University
Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464, Japan
June 1983
Permanent address:
1)Department of Applied Physics, Okayama University of Science
2) Institute of Space andAstronautical Science
3) Departmen'. of Crystalline Materials Science, Faculty of Engineering, Nagoya University
This document is prepared as a preprint of compnation of atomic data for fusion
research sponsored fuuy or partly bythe WP/Nagoya University. This is intended for
future Pubhcation in a JOumalor will be included in a data book after some evaluations
or rearrangements of its contents. This document should not be referred without the
agreement of the au也ors. Enquiries about copyright and reproduction血ould be ad・
dressed to Research lnformation Center, IPPrNagoya Umiversity , Nagoya, Japan.
Abs七rac七
The angular dependence of sputtering yields of light-ion sputtering
and heavy-ion sputtering has been investigated in detail , and the
●
following empirical formula is proposed・.
Y(0)
tf exp卜=(モー1)】 .Y(0)
where 8 is the angle of incidence measured from七be surねce normal.
and t=
i/cos 8. The parameters f and ∑ are adjustable parameters
which are determined by the least-square method so as to fit the present
empirical formula to available experimental data.●
The best-fit parameters and their average values are listed in
七ables′ wllere the value of Oopt is listed土n place of ∑・ Here′ Oopt is
the angle of incidence at the maximum yield and the relation between
8opt and ∑ is simpler i・e-
∑ ≡ fcos Oopt・
The present empirical formula has been compared with available●
experimental data of various ion-target combinations, and it is found
that the agreement is satisfactory in a wide range of the angle of
incidence.
i. =ntroduction
Current needs for sputtering yield at normal incidence and at
oblique incidence have accelerated the experimental measurements of
sputtering yields, particularly by light ions. The extensive uses of
sputtering data for the design Of the fusion reactors required the■
comparison of experimental data with empirical formula and●
the reliable empirical formulae at normal and d・blique incidences.●
■
The empirical formulae for the sputtering yields at normal
incidence have been proposed by Bohdansky et al・l r ・Matsunami et al●2,
and Yamamura et al・3 The compilations of the experimental data for
available combinations of ions and target atoms have been published4,5.
The angular dependence of sputtering yields has been investi9・ated
by many authors6-25 and it was found that its dependence on the angle
of incidence was roughly given by cos-1e for not-too-oblique incidencer8
where a is measured from the surface normal. On the other hand, the
theoretical investigation on the angular dependence of sputtering
yields was done by Sigmuna26r who showed that the normalized yield
y(o)/y(o) had the cos-fo-dependence at not-too-oblique incidence,
where l
the energy and increasing the s・urface binding energy・ For the grazing
aLlgle of incidence, the surface channeling plays an important role and
makes the drop-off of the sputtering yield at the glancing angles.
=t is desired to have some analytical formula describing the angularr
dependence of the sputtering yields in a wide range of the angle of
incidence・ =n this papert a simple formula for the angular dependence
of the norm畠Iized sputtering yield Y(0)/Y(0) is proposedl taking into
account the effect of the surface channeling at large angles, and the
cわmparison of the present empirical formula with the existing
●
experimental data will be made in detail.
■
2. An empirical formula for angular dependence of sputtering yields
Light-ion sputtering is mainly due to collision cascades a.reated by
ions backscattered from the interior of the solidT While the heavy-ion
sputtering is due to collision cascades generated by incoming ions
directly27・ This difference is very important for low-energy sputteringt
especially for the angular dependence of low-energy sputtering.
=n the case of light-ion sputteringp the angular dependence of the
threshold energy does not have a clear minimum. Or! the contrary, in
the case of heavy-ion sputtering, the angular dependence of the threshold
energy has a minimum near 600. The threshold energy of heavy-ion sput-
tering is a decreasing function of the angle of incidence because of
the anisotropIC Velocity distribution of recoil atoms near the surface,●
and for gra2;ing尋ngles of incidence it increases rapidly with increasing
angle of incidence because of surface channeling. (see APPENDIX A).
=n other words, even if the ion energy is less than the threshold
energy at normal incidencel the finite number of target atoms willbe
sputtered in oblique incidence in the case of heavy-ion sputtering.
=t must be noted that the nomali2:ed sputtering yield Y(8)/1'(a) canl not
=
be well defined in such a low energy region.
-2-
・
2.i Angular dependence of light-ion sputtering
Light-ion sputtering is directly connected with the particle reflec-
tion coefficient because iもis due to co.uision cascades generatedby
backscattered ions. F空Cently. Yamamura et a1・ have derived the following
form山a28
y(E)=...。2且空包竺」
【 i_ (ヱ虹)舌】2・8 (1)u
E
S
for light-ion sputtering at normalincidence, where FD(E*) is the
deposited energy near the solid surfaceby a backscattered ion, E* is
the average energy of the reflected ion, and RN(F・) is the particle reflection
coefficient of the ion with the incident energy E。 The- surface binding energy Us is
taken to be equal to the sublimation energy。 EthlS the threshold energy of the
sputtering at normal incidence.
●
For not-too-oblique incidence, the normalized yield is given by
☆
Y(0) RN(E,8)(2)
Y(0) FD(E☆) RN(E)
where the threshold effect of the light ion sputtering lS neglected because of its
weak angular dependence and Y(0) is the sputtering yield at normal incidence which
is described by Y(E) in eq。(1)。 Similarly RN(E) means RN(E,0=0)。
The angular dependence of the reflection coefficientis roughly
estimated in terns of the rangedistribution4 For very small angles of
incidence・ the ratio RN(E,e)/RN(E) is given by
RN('l7・ 0)
RN(E)
where
O
LcodxF(E.0,Ⅹ)
I:dxF(E・Opx)
・y2㌔
fR=l'苛`
(cos8)-fR ∫ (3)
(4)
and F(E,0,Ⅹ) is the range distribution and the subsrl・rLptR of the
moments means those of the range distribution・The Fi!XPOnent
fR is
nearly equalto 2 for large mass ratio29・
since E*(0) does not depend so largely on the a,Algle of incidence・
-3-
the angula.r dependence of Y(0)/Y(0) is mainly determined by those Of the
particle reflection coefficient, and we can write
Y(8)=
(coso)-fR (5)
Y(0)F
As the angle of incidence increasesl the effect of surface channeling
becomes important. =n order to sputter target atoms at the outermost
layer, the proコeCtile mus七penetrate the first layer of the solid●
surface, and this penetration probability is roughly estimated by
exp(-
NoRo/cosO),
where cT is the hard-sphere collision cross section between a proコeCtile~ 4
I
and a target atom, Ro =N一言is the average lattice conLtlLtant Of the randomI
target, and N is the number density of the target atom・
From above discussions we know that the angular dependence of the
normalized yield will have the form
Y(8)
=七fexp卜∑(モー1)】 ∫ (6)
Y(0)
where t= i/cos a and the parameters f and E are adjustable parameters.
\
The angle of incidence at the maximum yi'eld is simply given by●
∑
oop七=COS-1(丁) ・ (7)
Using the least-square method, the best-fit parameters to the
present empirical formula are obtained from experimental data19,20,21,24■
and computer results (ACAT)30・ The best-fit values of f and 8opt
are listed in Table 2. =t is very interesting that the best fit f's
are nearly equal to 2 which is a theoretical value of Eq. (4) ・
The best-fit values of f depend slightly on the sublimation energy
and so the ratio of the best-fit f to巧is plottedas a function of
mass ratio M2/Ml in Fig・ 1・ where瀬I and H2 are the atomic masses of
a projectile and a target atomt respectively・ The solid linein Fig・ i
●
corresponds to the average value of f which satisfies thefoil(wing
も
rela七土on:
-4-
√町
≡ o・94 - l・33 × 10-3(M2/Ml) ・
=n Fig・ 2 the best-fit values of Oopt are plotted
function of
al
主
)2 .rl ≡
(8)
aS a
(9)Ro 2Eq
主
where q= (Us/yE )2 corresponds to the cosine of the scattering angle
of a recoil atom which gains the energy Us in a single co11ision・
The LSS reduced energy 。 is defined by E≡
E/ELF Where
EL=
M1+M2 ZIZ2e2
M2 a
a= 0.4685 (
1 1
)2
zi/3・z13
'・
▼◆-†・I
(10)
(ll)
zl and Z2 are the atomic numbers of a projectile and a target atom,■
respectively・and y≡ 4MIM2/(Ml-2)2† Ml and・M2 being
The solid line in Fig. 2 is a theoretical curve of
eopt=900 - 57・3n
their masses.
oopt31
(12)
which is derived fromthe direct knock-out model. The且greementbetween
the besモーfit values and七he七beoretical results is very good. and so
we can calculate Oopt from the七beore七ical f-mula・
2.2 Angular dependence of heavy-ion sputtering
=n the case of heavy-ion sputtering, one cannot neglect the threshold
effect which is a decreasing function of the angle of incidence for the
not-too-oblique incidence. This means that the normali2:ed yield has
the following angular dependence :
Y(8)
Y(0)
- (cose)-fs [,
去
i - (Eth/E)2cose
1-
(E七h/≡)2
(13)
where the exponent fs is given in the form by Sigmund26 asfollows・・
■
--5-
fs=1+
くY2,。
.くⅩ,㌔DL
Dー1 】 (14)
for not-too-large angles of incidence, where the subscript D of the
moment means those of the damage distribution.
r
The neccessary condition for the genuine collision cascade near the
solid surface 土s 七ha七tbe proコeCtile must penetrate a few layer of the●
surface. This means that an empirical formula for heavy-ion sputtering
can be expressed by the product of the similar expression to that for
light-ion sputtering and the threshold term of Eq. (13). At present,
the threshold energy is not well established. For simplicity, let us
●
employ an empirical formula with the same functional form as that of
light-ion sputtering, eq.(6), i.e.,
Y(8)
=tf exp卜∑(セー1)】 , (15)
Y(0)
whe工・e 七he exponen七 f will include the threshold effect o王Eq. (13) , and
so it will depend on the ion energy in the low-energy region. This
tendency is much different from light-ion sputtering.
℡be besモーfit parameters to the present formula′ Eq. (15). are obtained
for about 25 ion-target combinations (Table i) , using the least-square
metho(ヨ and are listed 土n ℡able 3. エn the energy
region Where the threshold effect can be neglected, the best-fit values●
of f are consistent with Sigmund fs, a8 Shown in Fig・ 3・
=n Figq 4 the ratios of the best-fit fls to sigmund fs are plotted
主
as a function of ち≡ i - (Eth/E)2・ where Eth is calculated from the
following relation:3
Eth-
l・5斗【l・ l・38 (Ml,M2,h・2 (16,
with h- 0・834 for出2>Ml andh
= 0・18 for M2
1-
;
1 + 2.5 (17)
Equation (17) shows that f is infinite at E = Eth, Which corresponds
to the fact that the normalized sputtering yield Y(e)/Y(0) is not well
defined in the energy region Of E < Eth・●
ェn叫・5 the besモーfit values of 900-
Oopt are plotted a9ains七
中- (エ)3/2 1Ro
ZIZ2
2/3 . ,, 2/3(zlりJ + z2りJ)2 ÷-喜
The parameter ゆis directly connected with the critical angle
よ
中c= (uR(0)/E )2
(18)
(19)
of surface channeling, where uR(0) is the average potential at the
amorphous solid surface which is defined in ÅppF.ND=Ⅹ A. The solid line
in Fig・ 5 means the average value of the best-fit Ooptls which has the
form
oopt=900-286・0中0・45 ~ (20)
3. Compilation of Experimental Data on Angular Dependence of
Sputtering Yields
The angular dependence of sputtering yields of various combinations
has been compiled and stored 土n a computer. ℡be compiled data
are summarized in Table i. When determining the best-fit values of the
adjustable parameters f and ∑. we excluded the experimental data which
do no七have explicit maximum values or which do not bave 七he data at
normal土ncidence.
Table 4 shows the physical constants necessary for calculating the
angular dependece of・ the sputtering yield by means of the present
empirical formula. For extensive use of the present empirical formula,● ●
the parameters f and Tl are Calculated from Eq. (8) and Eq. (9)宕or
● ●
typical proコeCtiles H, D, T and He, which are listed in Tables 5. 6
-7-
7 and 8, where the calculated parameters TI COrreSPOnd to i Rev ion.
For calculations of the angular dependence of heavy-ion sputtering1
26
Sigmund f of m= i/3 and * for i eV ion are also calculated and
listed in Tables 9 through 18, where as the
typical p;ojectiles C4;1・Art Fe・ Nit Cur Kr・ Ⅹe and Fg ions are
selected.
The plots of the angular dependence of sputtering yields for various
combinations of the incident ions and the target atoms are Shown in
Figs. 6 through 58, where Figs. 6 through 24 corres妄)ond to light-ion
sputtering and Figs. 25 through 58 to heavy-ion sputtering. The solid
lines in these figures are best fit curves to the present empirical■
formula, and the solid lines with cross marks show the results calcu-
1ated by putting the average values,of
the best-fit parameters into
each empirical formula.●
工n order to know the absolute yield Y(0). one must calcula七e 七he
sputtering yield at normal incidence. The authors recommend to use
the third Matsunami formula for the sputtering yield at normal incidence,
wb土ch has七he form32
Y(I) = P
where
sn(∈)
i + 0・135Usse(e)
【 - (Eth/E)喜】2・8 ′
EL N
p = 0・042 --α(M2/Ml)Q(Z2)・
RL Us
lRL=
甘a2Ⅳy
′
エ
se(E) =ke2 .
(21)
(22)
(22)
(23)
and sn(c) is the LSS elastic stopping cross section in the reduced unit
and七he following analytical express土on 土s useful for 七be present
purpose=2
3.441yqlog(∈ + 2.718)
sn(E)i + 6.355JE+ a(-1.708 + 6.882ノ官)
-8-
. (24)
The inelastic coefficient k of se(E) is given as33
k = 0・0793 Zll/6
主
(・zIZ.2)2 (Ml + M2)3/2
(z12/3 + z22/3)
. (25)
and the threshold energy Eth for the third Matsunamiformula has the
following empirical relation I
Eth - Us 【1・9 + 3・8(Ml/M2) + 0・314(H2/Ml)l・24】・ (26)
The parameter α(M2/Hl)is represented as
α(H2/Ml)= 0・08 + 0・164 (M2/Ml)0・45+ o・o145 (H2/Ml)l・29
(27)
and Q(Z2) is listed in Table 4 for each element・ For extensive uses
of the third Matsunami formula, the parameters EL, P, Eth, α and k
are listed in Tables 19 through 32 for various ion-target combinations,
where as the projectile H, D, T, ne, C, Ne, A1, Ar', Fe, Ni,Cu, Kr,
■
'Xe and Hg are selected.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to、thankPro fs. H.Oechsner and H・L・Bay for
their kind supplies of their experimental data・ The authors are
indebted to Prof. M.Mannami for his kind interest in this work・
The author (Y.Y) alsow弧tS tO thank MTS・ K・Yamamoto, H・Arinobu'
s.Kobayashir Y・Mizuno and Hiss K・Yasuda for their continuous assistance
on this work.
-9-
References
i) J・ Bohdansky, J. Roth, and H.L. Bay, J. App1. Phys. 51, 2861 (1980)
2) N. Hatsunami, y. yamamura, y. ztikawa, N. =toh, Y. Kazumata,
S. Hiyagawa, R. Morita, and R. Shj.mizu,
Radiat. Eff. I'ett. 50, 39 (1980).
3) Y. Yamamura, N. Hatsunami, and N. =toh,
Radiat. Eff. Lett・堕, 83 (1982)・●
4) N. Matsunaml, Y. Yamamura, Y. =tikawa, N. =toh, Y. Kazumata.
S. Miyagawa. R. norita, and R. Shimizu,
Report =PPJ-AM-14,Institute of Plasma Physics,
Nagaya University (1980).
5) J. Both, J. Bohdansky, and W. Ottenberger,
=PP 9/26, max-Plank-=nstitut fur Plasmaphysik (1979).
L
6) G.K. Wehner, J. App1. Phys. 30, 1762 (1959).
7) P.K. Ro1, J.M. Fluit, and J. Kistemaker, Physica 26, 1000 (1960).
8) V.A. Malchanov and V.G. Te1'kovskii,
′
Sovie七Phys・-
Doklady 旦′137 (1961)I
9) D. Almen and G. Bruce, Nuc1. =nstr. Methods ll, 257 (1961).
10) I.I. Dushkov, Ⅴ.A. Malchanov′ Ⅴ.G. Tellchanov, Ⅴ.M. Chicherov,
Sovie七Phys.-
℡echn土cal Pbys. 6. 735 (1962).
ll) C.E. 又amer, A.A. Narasimham, H.R. Reynolds, and J.C. Allred,
J. Appl. Pbys. 35. 1673 (1964).
12) E.S. Mashkova and V.A. Malchanov,
Sov土e七phys.-
℡echn土cal Phys. 9. 1601 (1965).
13) K.B. Cheney and E.T. Pitkin, J. App1. Phys. 36, 3542 (1965).
14) G. Dupp and A. Scharmann, Zeit. Phys. 194. 448 (1966).
15) L.N. Evdokimov and V.A. Malchanov, Can. J. Phys. 46, 779 (1968).
16) H.工smail and A. Sep七土er′
proc. 3rd =nt. Symp・ on Discharges and Electrical Insulation
土n Vacuum. (1968) p 95.
-10-
17) G. Holmen and Q. Almen, Ark. Fys. 40, 429 (1970).
18) A.J. Su皿erS, N.J. Freeman, and N.R. Daly,●
J. Appl. Phys. 42. 4774 (1971).
19) H. Oechsner, Z. Phys. 261, 37 (1973).
20) H.L. Bay and J. Bohdan?ky, App1. Phys. 19, 421 (1979).
21) H.L. Bay, J. Bohdansky, W.0. Hofer, and J. Roth,
Appl. pbys. 21. 327 (1980)
22) W. Kruger, A. Scharmann,打. Afrid, and G. Brauer,
Proc. of Symposium on Sputtering, perchtoldsdorf/Wien,
Austria (1980), p. 28.
23) D.A. Thompson and S.S. Johar, Radiat. Eff. 55, 91 (1981).
24) J. Bohdansky, G.L. Chen, W. Eckstein, J. Both, and B.M.U. Scherzer,
J. Nuc1. Mater. 111&112, 717 (1982).
25) J. Bohdansky, Nuc1. Fusion (to be published).
26) P. Sig7nund, Phys. Rev. 184, 383 (1969).
27) A.W. Weissmann and P. Sigmund, Radiat. Eff. 19, 7 (1973).
28) Y. Yamamura, N. Matsunami, and N. =toh,
Radia七. Eff. 71, 65 (1983).
29) K.B. Winterbon, P. Sigmund, and J.B. Sanders,
Mat.-Fys. Mead. Dan. Via. Selsk. 37, 14 (1970)
30) W. Takeuchi and Y. Yamamura, Radiat. Eff. 71, 53 (1983).
31) Y. Yamamura, Radiat. Eff. (to be published).
32) N. Matsunami, Y. Yamamura, Y. =tikawa, N. =toh, Y. Razumata,
S. Miyagawa, K. Morita, and R. Shimizu,
ATOM=C DATA AND NUCLEAR DATA TABLES (to be published).
33) J. Lindhard, A. Scharff, and H.E. Schiott,
Mat.-Fys. Mead. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 33, No.14 (1963).
34) R. Behrisch, G. Maderlechner, B.M.U. Scher2:er, and M.T. Robinson,
且ppl. Pbys. 18. 391 (1981).
35) Y. Yamamura, Radiat. Eff. 55. 49 (1980).
-Il-
APPENDIX A: ANGULAR DEPENDENCE OF THRESHOLD ENERGY OF LIGHT-ION
SPUTTER=NG AND 王王EAVY-ION SPUTTERING
The sputtering mechanism for oblique incidence is separated into three
parts; 1) ℡わe mechanism due to 七be d土rec七knock-ou七 coll土sions w土七h
incident ions at the outermost layer of the solid surface (mechanism
=a dffFig. A1). 2) The mechanism due to collision cascades created by
incoming ions near the solid surface (mechansim =b of Fig. A1)
3) The.mechanism due to collision cascades generated by ions backscatted
from the interior of the solids (mechanism I of Fig. A1).
.UECHA.1【S.iI PIECHA.1(SJl Ⅱ
E)
E
E)
?
∈
/○ i%+kj/
、J.st、、、、、、/ゝ■
Fig. AI Schematic representation of sputtering
mechanism a七obl土que 土nc土dぐnCe
For light-ion sputtering the mechanisms =a and I play an important
role.
The threshold energy of mechanism I is given as34
Us 1
Y ( 1- y)
(Al)
for normal incidence・ For not-too-large angles of incidence, the
factor (i - y) of Eq・ (A1) must be modified. =f only a single colli-
sion process is taken into considerationt the threshold energy will be
a slightly decreasing function ot- the angle of incidence・ For oblique
incidence( howeverr the multiple scattering becomes important and this
effect weaken the angular dependence of the factor (1 - y). Roughly
speaking, the threshold energy of mechanism I is
-12-
Eth
-+ 1-
ycos2(o/2)
(A2)
for not-too-oblique incidencet where the difference of the scattering
angles between in the L system and in the CH system is neglected because
of large mass ratio.
For oblique incidence, an incoming ion must penetrate the first
layer for mechanism I. The average potential at the surface of the
amorphous solids is roughly estimated by
uR(Y,
-苛!芸;;孟zI 2TrdrV(
1.+Rn′∠
.00
0
y- z)2+r2 ). (且3)
where tis the distance from the surface and V(r) is the interatomic
potential. =f one employ the !4oliere potential as the interatomic
poten七土al we have
A
uR(y) =4甘A + 1
EL(‥-)3 z3a α.
1_____二~~~.
~~LJ
Ro i-1
βfw九e re
aS
A = M2/Hl・
α.≡ (0.35. 0.55, 0.10)
1
sinh(%0,ex,(上y,,
a
(A4)
βi= (0・3.1・2・6・0)
・
■
The critical angle for penetration through the first layer is given
中c=
cos-1[ロR(0) エ
】2 , (A5)
whereゆcis measured from the surface norma1・ The critical angle中c
for the incident energy of the order of the threshold energy is about
50o for=-Ni・
For e 700) , the direct knock-out
process become important and the criterion of the sptittering due to
this process is given by31■
-13-
cos8+ 2q < 1
p2 >pl > Rocos8
エ
where q= (Us/岬)2 and the impact parameters pl and p2 are the lower
and the upper lim土七s of 七he impact parameters available for 七he
f
sputtering due to the direct knock-out process.
From the inequality of玉q. (A7) we obtain
Eth・(0)
ロs1
= 二
~Y
siふ4(a/2)
I (A9)
The criterion of Eq. (A8) is not important as compared with surface
channeling for oblique incidence. Namely. in order to knock off an
atom at the outermost layer, an ion must arrive at the surface. This
leads to the following expression for the threshold energy:
Eth(0) ≡UR(Ro/2)
cos2 o
(良lo)
where uR(Ro/2) is the average potentialat thedistance Ro/2・ at which
there exists an atom with a f土ni七e probability ill the case of the
random target. From Eq. (A4),
巨=
tlJ
>一
t3
(亡
tA)Z
t▲J
亡1
■■
l⊃`⊂
OT
tJ}
CE:
I
[=
0 3O 60 90
月NGし∈ OF 【NC柑ENCE (DEGREE)
uR(Ro/2) = UR(0)/2・
Fig. A2
The angular dependence of the●
threshold energies for H + Ni.
mechan土sm Ⅱ
direc七 knock-ou七 process
surface channeling
-14-
Y/
Zn Fig. A2 the threshold energies COrreSPOnding to each mechanism●
are plotted against the angle of incidence. Figure A2 te11s us that
●
the threshold energies COrreSPOnding to the direct knock-out process
can be neglected. Fina11y we get
i - ycos2(a/2)
i + A26.85
Eきh(8)-EL'%'2~~~~~■
■二:∴~:~~~
」._
cos2o
for not-too-oblique incidence
(Alュ)
for gra2:ing angles of incidence
When the incident energy is very low, sputtered atoms will be elected・●
before 七hey lose the memory of 七he d土rect土on of 七be inciden七ion beam.
This means tbat七he velocity dis七ribu七土on of recoil atoms generated by
incoming heavy-ions is anisotropic. Taking into account the anisotropic
effect of the recoil flux′ Yamamura 5'howed that the angular dependence
of the heavy-ion sput・cering was proportional to cos2 o
35.
For gra2:ing angles of incidence, the surface channeling will play
an important role. =n the case of heavy-ion sputtering, the threshold
●
energy due to surface channeling is given by
E七h(8)
u氏(ym土n)
cos28
(A12)
where ymin is the minimum distance above which the projectile will
be reflected without producing any recoil atom available for sputtering.
For the amorphous solid surface the minimum distance ymin may be of
the order of
ymin+
pm土n ∫ (A13 )
where pmin is the collision diameter for the Moliere potential and
depends on the incident energy. Since the incident energy of present
interest is very low, pmin is roughly given by
pm土n≡
Sa
-15-
where s is the soluti・on of the following transcendental equation!
∈ =exp(-
0.3s)/s .
Let us consider a typical example, i・e., Ar+-Cu. =n this
■
case, s is nearly equal to 15・ =n Fig・ A3 the angular dependence of
threshold energ・y for Ar+ -u is plotted as a function of the angleI
o王土ncidence・ Finally′ we have
H
Eth(0)
Eth(0) cos2o far not-too-oblique incidence
o・3品EL';,3'A14L,
for grazing angles of ir).cidencecos2o
where Eth(0) is the thresholdenergy at normal incidence・ and ymin
is se七to equal to Ro/2 + 15a・
Fig. A3
望he angular dependence
of the threshold energies●
for Ar + Cu.
mechan土sm エ
surface channeling
-16-
I
「■T
>-
1コ
【亡
▼■
巨2j
uJ
⊂】
t33Ill
LU
【亡
:亡
二=コ
10)
102
0 3D 60 90
RNGLE OF TNCIDENCE tDEGR∈E)
Table 】 工on-target combinations in the present data compilation
References
Target
ュon C AITiFe NiCu Zr馳Mo Pd Ag Ta W Pt Au
wehner (1959)
Roュ et al. (1960)
hrchanov et al. (1961)
AITnen et al. (1961)
Dushikov et al. (1962)
Raner et al. (1964)
Marchanov et al. (1965)
Cheney et al. (1965)
Dupp et al. (1966)
Evdokimov et al. (1968)
工smail et al. (1968)
Hoitnen et al. (1970)
Su1皿rerS et al. (1971)
Oecbsner (1973)
Bay et al. (1979)
Bay e亡al. (1980)
Kruger et al. (1980)
Thonpson et al. (1980)
Bobdansky et al. (1982)
Bohdansky (1983)
嘩g
Ar
Ar
Kr
tie
N
Ne
Ar
Ar
Ar
Xe
Ar
Ne
Ar
Kr
tis
tlg
D
tie
Nb
tie
Ne
Ar
Kr
Xe
ヱ
D
TIC
Ⅱ
Ar
P
Sb
Bi
帽
D
tie
H
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-17-
Table乏 Best-fit parameters of the present empirical
formula for light-ion sputtering
Best-fit values
Energy =on Target
450 eV
l keV
4 keV
450 eV
l keV
4 keV
I JくeV
IOO eV
500 eV
l keV
4 keV
4 keV
50 keV
1.05.keV
2 keV
8 keV
2 keV
4 keV
l key
4 keV
He
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
H Mo
H Mo
D Mo
He Mo
H Åu
刀 Au
1 Rev D Au
1.62
2.34
2.27
2.19
2.32
2.62
1.88
3.20
3.30
2.50
2.09
1.52
1.88
1.55
2.40
2.80
1.98
2.23
1.14
1.53
1.22
8op七Ref.
74.40
78.30
82.30
78.70
82.9o
84.20
80.40
56.30
66.10
72.10
79.00
80.5o
82.10
25
20
20
20
30
30
30
30
30
30
20
66.50 19
81.80 20
82.00 20
82.00 20
77.30 20
78.00 20
79.50 20
79.20 20
-18-
Table 3 Best-fit parameters of the present empirical●
formula for heavy-ion sputtering
Energy =on Target
Best-fit values
f Oopt
Ref.
30 eV Ar
50 eV Ar
100 eV Ar
500 eV Ar
1 keV Ar
5 keV
20 keV
50 eV
100 eV
500 eV
1 keV
5 keV
t>
50 eV
100 eV
500 eV
1 keV
5 keV
10 keV
200 eV
800 eV
400 eV
800 eV
200 ev
800 eV
400 eV
200 eV
400 eV
800 eV
Ar
Ar
Hg
Hg
Hg
Hg
Hg
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Hg
Hg
Hg
Hg
H9
Hg
Hg
Hg
Hg
Hg
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Ni
Fe
Fe
Mo
Mo
℡a
W
W
W
35.4 44.20
9.33 46.10
5.25 43.6o
3.35 49.6o
3.07 55.70
2.66 65.70
2.19 75.00
37.1 47.5¢
15.0 52.5o
5.01 61.20
4.02 63.30
3.56 64.70
22.8 44.2
ll.8 45.5o
3.75 50.50
3.05 56.2o
3.13 64.20
3.37 66.4o
12.8 48.2
8.57 51.00
15.5 57.60
9.53 60.70
26.0 53.00
26.9 50.90
15.0 62.00
5.87 58.30
10.6 52.8o
7.64 56.1o
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
-19-
でable 3 (continuedl
Energy Ion Target
Besモーf主七 values
f Oop七
1.05 keV
1.05 keV
i.05 J{eV
1.05 keV
1.05 keV
1.05 keV
550 eV
1.05 keV
1.55 keV
2.05 keV
1.05 keV
1.05 keV
1.05 keV
1.05 keV
1.05 keV
37 keV
30 keV
9.5 keV
30 keV
30 keV
9.5 keV
Ar
Ar
Ar
Ne
Ar
Kr
Xe
Xe
AI
Ti
Ni
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Ⅹe Cu
Xe Cu
Ar Zr
Ar Pd
Ar Ag
Ar Ta
Ar Au
Ar Cu
Xe Cu
Xe Cu
Xe Mo
Xe W
Xe W
Ref.
2.10 70.20
2.04 68.80
1.72 69.5(I
1.03 70.6o
1.29 69.80
2.19 66.9o
9.40 53.80
4.56 61.50
3.89 64.Oo
2.44 69.00
1.73 67.70
1.85 63.10
1.50 63.70
1.75 67.50
1.50 59.80
1.16 71.9o
1.94 75.00
2.53 69.50
2.58 76.7o
1.33 78.50
1.07 76.Oo
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
13
13
13
13
13
13
、■~-
-20-
I:]j
蛋
Table 4 Some physical constants for calculations of sputtering yields.
■
Table 5 through 8
The parameters for the angular dependence of light-ion
sputtering.
℡he correspondence between でables and proコeCtj・・1es aret
as follows:
H : Table 5
D : ℡able 6
T : Table 7
He : Table 8
Let us show briefly how to use these tables and suppose the
angular dependence of 4 keV H+ - Ni is desired・
The appropria.te table is Table 5. From Table 5 we have
よ
f = (4.44)2×(o.94 - 0.00133×58.24) = i.82 ,
where figures in italics corresponds to values in Table 5.
The quantity n is inversely proportional to El/4 and so we
get
n-
(÷)i/4×o・1535-0・1085 ・
From Eq・ (12) Oopt can be calculated as follows:
oop七 = 900 -57.3×0.1085= 83.8o.
since ∑ - fcosOop七′ We have
∑ = 1.82 cos83.80= 0.197.
Finally, we have the following angular dependence for 4 keV
H+)Nil
淋-Ⅹl・82exp卜0・197(Ⅹ-i)]・
where x≡ 1/cos 0
-21-
Tables 9 through 18
The parameters for the angulardependence of heavy-ion
sputtering.
℡he correspondence between でables and proコeC七土1esare as
t
follows王
C : ℡able 9
Al ; でable ll
F占: Table 13
c】 : でable 15
Xe : Table 17
Ne : Table 10
Ar
Ni
Xr
Hg
I
●
■
●
●
●
でable 12
でable 14
でable 16
: でable 18
L.e{tuh;;hJ;:i::i;…三≡nhd::ce7o.;s;eta≡:ei。三a…;:t…:rri:ag:Cu三:…三?ns確suppose the angular
dependence of i keV Ar+- Cu is desired・
The appropriate tableis Table 15・ Fist of all, we must
calculate 七he quanti七y ∈
1 よ
こ= 1-
(Eth/E)富= i- (20・72/1000)2
≡ o・8561・
since fs = =・7=, the parameter fis calculated from Eq・ (17),
f-1.71 X(i+ 2.5xO.1439/0.8561)- 2・43
The quantity 1+is inversely proportional to y@・ which
is
known from Eq. (18). Then, we have
中- 0.1305/価甘- 0・004127 ・
From Eq. (20) we get
oopt = 900 -286xO・0041270・45= 65・80
地e relation ∑≡ fcos Oop七yields
∑ = 2.43cos65.80= 0.9961.
2n the above calculations( figuresin italics are the values
in Tab1(,. 15. Finallyr we get the following angulardependence
for i key Ar+ → Cu(・
Y(8)
印丁≡
Ⅹ2・43exp卜0・9961(Ⅹ
- 1)】・
where x≡ 1/cos8.
-22-
Table 19 through 32-J
The parameters for the third Hatsunami formula,
where the correspondences between Tables and projectiles■
. are as follows:
H
He
Al
Ⅳ土
Ⅹe
でable 19
℡able 22
℡able 25
℡able 28
: Table 31
D ; ℡able 20
C ; ℡able 23
Ar : Table 26
Cu : ℡able 29
Hg : Table 32.
T : Table 21
Ne.・ Table 24
Fe : Table 27
Kr : Table 30
Let us show how to use these tables for calculations of
sputtering yields at normal incidence by the third
Matsunamj. formula. Suppose the sputtering yield of i key
I+ - Ni is desired・ The appropriate table is Table 19・
The reduced energy E for i keV Ar+ → Ni is calculated
like tb土s
∈ - 1000/(β.7ββ × 1000)- 0.3572.
Direct insertion of七bis value土nto Eqs. (23) and (24)
yields
se(e)= 4・35 X何=汚詔~= 2・60
sn(e) =0・408 ・
SinceP= 0・4814 and Eth= 100・6, we have
y= 0.4814 × 0.408/(i + 0.35×4.44×2.60 )
x [ i - (100.6)i ]2・8 = i.33x10-2(atoms/ion),
where U= 4.44 eV is in Table 4, and in the above calculations
S
figures in italics corresponds to those in the present tables・
-23-
24
■■」
P
80h
′■
4uq・l
h・^
A
a
ち亡?tB
〟~I
i
O
Bi
▲J
[∃q
J}
A
r:0U
●1
41 4)O t>・{ hJ} F4J} El■I
A E!0
41 It)
tn F;
lil.貞4I>
lH
< 0
lqT
l▼1
41
.E:〟
ヰI
O
■I
コl・」
吋>
○
>■
>■
PL
4J⊂
t. tLI=
L. L) E
LI ∈ OI) )
d
∈ Z J,I
コ ■
Z u ∈=
【;」■ ∈ ■■V[ O J)4 J,J コ
Z: (= Lrl
n!bl
>t.LJ=1
1I
E;
a
f<
Oi)
∈>
V)
<
ゴI:EElコtL
J
4Ul■l
∝●・■
隻ロ¶
トZ
uLn山
4:lL
LLlエー
E)Ia
く⊂」=】I:α
t⊃LL
l■l
妻⊃U)L=l工=
lコ∝■■
=ト
LLl
=ト
∝0T)
tAト
≡l王u=
Ul之t⊃U
.」aU
ln>
=A.
田
l
凹
・;
・・・・
・-
:ILL
iI
; -..::;:
‥■・‡ニ
A.1':-
;iTT十25
∴lf.1;・::.田
-●‥●
t>亡
-■●
i■l
▲J
コEL
tlJ
亡○■■l
●J
.⊂EIt
J
L
O-I
t■
亡
○
>E.i
し
0■■
I
>=
:ト
t>
L
IJ⊂U
⊂
○
.■lI
∈
I)
コ
U7
Pth
r、l O・n、O
Jl ■■
Q寸nl>一r
q ■
し
Lr
召コZ
U
∈○~
<
○ -1
I) Z:∈ ヽ> NLr) E
Q■■J}
4
丘=
¢す1
4
こ
○
く⊃
○
=≡
iZ!J
至1
白rl醍
>・
也Z
氏:LJJト・
ト
⊃(LUI
Zl⊃
I
ト
= OL9 0~ 0」
..,;LL.エ0 4 4 +
LLJr p L
`コ ● ■ ●
2 ■ ■ ■
LLI I J L
亡l ■ ● ●
Z ● ●B:u a: LAIA LLJ Ld LEI
LLJ_J
fB :Elコ=】⊂⊃
ト⊃三氏:U= Ia LJJ LJIJ pつ[ tl)コ⊂l <L9iZ:~ EI ELa
tZ:t⊃tL
Ul
dELJ)トu=a
EE:l((L
田○⊂・IL i> ■● ◆l■■一 JJコ> ELl■ UIL■ ⊂⊂ OLJJ ■■I亡 4JO .⊂■■ 01⊂= ⊂=■ 」∈■■ LI4 QJ} ヽコ∽ ■◆~n tヽI?~Vl O1・rヽ○寸Tヽ寸 ●I.仁I)ヨコ≡ui0▲l 亡0二=>I■【=コLOL>1=一 ■ヽ0 ▼■雪 空>・ βlU) Z:8⊂=】J}■■垣=三11●=B・【∋:こ亡u≡:トコア■∽王(⊃■●I:≡エ 寸t9 ■■■■ O」 ~Nlibl⊃ ● ● ■● ● ●LLl t ' IU ● ● ■Z 4 P ■LLJ I I IE} + J oAdz I-:'馬聖書警萱」tつI U】:⊃ロ く一芸監":∝ロhGrl(こUト・LLJこa7コ
iiiiiiF
!
円
・二・二・・二.・こ
T;I.I_壬_
凹27
政
01
⊂
T4
■ヽ L
> b■ ◆l
ヽ′JJ
コiコ 「Ll
ロI tカ」
● ⊂⊂ 8
I.LLI ■■
■ lA) 亡 ■II EI L:コ ▼■ l■
Z ■ノ ー■ 」
LTl jj<
~ L.
C ■■ t)○ 上l ヽ・●J ⊃
< tTI +
El ●■
rl tヽ
nl1
¢一tD t>
○・q●
▼■N +
⊂
0l・■
>I
.i
■l■
L
8ヽ■
F
E) IIi) Z:
丘 ヽ> NUI Z:
q■■
J■
■
∝
コ1
11
q
Z:
L<
(⊃
○
l・■ヽヽ
■】b)
a」
LLJ==】
>
OZ●l■
王室LL)
≡
旨UI
Z⊂l=
Iト・
:⊂ .OtZ) ▼■~ O」
⊂;ユ】tL I-
⊂I ■ ■ ●
LLl + L 4
-⊃ ● ■ ●
Z ■ ■ ●
tJJL + '
1⊃ ■ ■ ■
Z 4 ●q:
巴[u缶岩LAJ
_Jdlrl⊃■■r:⊃
ト⊃ZIZ:uZ J
a LJJ n
喜謹∴軍歪L
'
A:l⊃LL.
ロl
∝LLJ[=
Ldこa
∝く=A.
・
・二÷・
I:
I ∴・・.
」⊥
:・一i・.:
・・
-
・::I:・・・
∴
・・・.:・
l
∃
;~
・;:・
‡1
28
●l・;`i.-;
I:I.
・・.・
ふ
::-
「二.:
l1
-
I:"'
・∴・
l[_:-tii:.:・・
l}
亡
■●
ー L
> りむ 1Jヽ■
.■l
コ> A
P U)L
■ 亡⊂ O
L LLI I
4I )J) ⊂:
.1JE: 0
.亡コ IP4 PZ JJ {
○ ■ 」亡I u ∈○
●■ -」
▼■ ∈ - 00 J) .+
ヽ...
。
P < m .I
rl ll
rl lヽ
ナウ・■
N一1rl J)
Nト
●rln ■
亡○
l・・■
>中▲こ
a■・
ど
○ ■■
I) Z:宅 ヽ>. ♪lU) Z:
○⊂=
■J
4∝
ll
tA
4
こ
aJu■■
>
【⊃Z=「
【亡LJ[;≡
ト
コ4.Lm
看■■●
l
ト、○コ: rl
O 亡I~ 0J
LI~<LJ. I○ ● ● 。
Lu + 1 4u 4 4 J
之 ■ ●
til t + LE) I 1 -
Z + 。Q:LJJ a: LJla. LLl tLJ内Lit J Ea I:q-I:コ
ト⊃Z血:U I I
a tJJ 【T-
」■つI U】コ⊂】 1王tD a: ■ヾZ:Z tli
dEl⊃l」
tJl
氏:■J
l~
LLJ
こ
く⊂∝く=也.
〟
29
>■
>-一
コヽ■
>■
E>
>ヽ LL< F7:L ⊂
I) L. LLI⊂ ■LLJ D 亡
e alt) コ .~ ■●l14 Z A
E) 4 t)
.E:l.1 ∈ ⊂
■ ●t 一 っ
む ∈ '< ∈i O J) t>
J= J} コ ーI- < tJI Ln
一 一- >○ -● 4I
.E)Z:
6 ヽ -1
> N
Lr, Z: L.- 0
こ:
○
■J
[1
1こ
dL■l
こ」
Z=
11・二
二・二:
亡IPjrrTl
l=
C)王
∝LLJトトコ【L
UI
Z
(⊃■・■
l:ト
> ●●
1王 OLJJ
= N
、8 ■■
LL Uロ
● ・■
●●
■
LAJ ++
t
U ●●
●
Z t+
t
td L■
●
亡l ●■
■
Z ■ ●∝Ld l= tAJA, LLJ LLJ dl
LJJ J d) I:
白=当室O:U Z 1
5巴.F,コ⊂I l工191Z:~ tI A.1王
αl⊃LL.
u)
こ!∃LLJトu:E<:■∃i`L
30
9r
:
・・:-:
問
>b
> -
コ>
ロl
> L.
O bし
⊂
tl i LAJ⊂ ~LLJ I) C
t! 0■○ ⊃ 一 ヽ■
I4 Z JJO 4 t】J:
U C 亡■ ●● 一 コ
tI C '・・4 eL O J) P
.亡▲J コ -d
ト く王 Lt) Lr7
0 ~I) fG ヽ
>■ NUI =
○●■
▲Jr
【E
ll
コ
:J
こ
a」山
>
L9Z
Fiu
トト・
コA.
tFI
Z⊂I
l
>
> l⊃< ~LLJ= 00
1J ■● rV
tL Zl⊃ ● ● ●
tJJ ' 1 f
U ● ● ●
a: + + 4LAJ r ・ *
E) p + +
Z 。 -1こLJJ ( LLl(L LLJ LAJ IZ)
岩ゴ窒き
d:i;ぎ〒1王Ld u)J■1 I Lrl
コロ <E5【亡N I:Z a.i
α⊂l
[rl
∽¢:山ト・
望q∝
aA,
31
ヽ■
I
711
コC⊂■
>4I
==
L
Oヽト
rl rJ
P'I亡I
n-
d)
l■On On▼■
>≡
>■L●上
L
I
⊂
bJ
⊂
8・■■
JJ■
∈一
一●
i)コ
∽
I
>I
>■【l
LF
LI⊂
●
LLJ i)∈
I) 3'■ Z8
ェ ∪■l
■■
4 ∈L 0
上 J■「= E一
○ ●■
.o=
ti ヽ
> rl
Lrl E
O・一l
.1Jq[∝
Vl=
q
Z:
OJLd
>■
C)Z
¢:下こ=
ニコ:⊃TIU)
ZO
I
⊆ q.
Ejl [づu= rl 、0
1I.・< rVLJ. a
⊂l● ● ●
bJ e 4 t
U● ● ●
Z ' ・ +
LLJ J L J
至二= コ =
2: Q +EELd d: LJJ
A LLI LJ)aLLJ
_.I巾r
書弼Ej衰二喜L9α:~ I
書LA:l⊃lL
tn
l=LAJ
巨l王
寺A
32
>4r
>ロI
L
■⊂
I. tLII
A E:
e 0コ ー ■■
Z J}4 1)
u 宅 E:■■ 一 コ
∈ '■ ∈I)
.白EP
JJ コ ・一
< Lrl tTL
~.I一っED
M■■
lヽ
ヽ○~PION・■
I■
LI
Oこコ
■・一 -
○ ■■I) r∈ ヽ> NLr) Z:
0
▲I
:≡
(亡
Plt
:■
=
>t[
>、
tPL
tl
⊂
LL1
1】
○
.⊂=
t
L
.⊂「=
T
L・:I
(⊃
.JLIL~
:ト
望a:
td\コ
ド⊃LLUI
ZE)■●
I>■
> <l⊂ ○・tJJ
エ..空毘LL<O
-I
.
t〟●
■一
口●
●●
巨∃=
コ=
LA)-
4 ・
q●
●●
I ・一正:LLl ∝ ILLA LLI LLJ da
LJJ.J(n工
芸昌幸喜」▼つl ∽コーコ l王t9dE: ~ J:之A.1王
a:l⊃LL
tTLl亡LAJ
.=LAJ
葺
隻7I
~▼■
uJLZ)
E・=コ
33
>4I
> -
41>
01ゝ L
O1 41L ⊂
b L LAJ⊂ むLL[ J) 亡
∈ OI) コ J■ Lr・■ Z ▲J
t) q l】
.亡U ∈ E:
d - .'I )
aJ ∈ - CL. O i) PJ= ▲J コ ーI- < ul LJl
Nlヽ
pl -ヽ
M ■■
■
tO O●■ ●■l
>三
し
○■■
I) 11i) Z:∈ ヽ> N
Uヽ 工
0●●
▲一It
B:
三dl
=.
=
亡IJu■■
>・
(⊃Z
∝u
ト
ト⊃巨∃帆
Z⊂】■・●
(>> lつ< c)tJJ
= 、0 lltlrln
LA. tJ.
【⊃ ● ■ ●
LLJ I f '
U I t ■
Z + ' ●
LLJ + 4 4⊂l ● ● ●
Z: ' '4:lLJ A: LJJ
8. LLI til (ちLL[J 仁IE亡I l- I: =I
ト;⊃Z
きu...z品∃31望Lad:~ I:Zlゝi
EE⊂)Lr)
tn氏:LJJ
ト
u王:a:・∃a【L
M▼■
uJIZ)
aト
34
>b
>-
●)ヽ
P> し
0 0I. ⊂
■ し LAJ⊂ ●
tAI J) Ce ロ
■ロ コ ー ■●~ 2: ▲l
O ■ `○
.亡U モ 亡
P ●■ ・r4 コt[ 宅 ■■ ∈L O
.8P
.⊂■l コ ●■
ト く U】 Ln
=ヽ
Nr
0■■
JJ
=CE
≡≡■
=
C)」F■■
.
>
qla==1
(亡t4Jト
ト
⊃AIll
Z(⊃==
I>
>-
1王 lヽ
聖_宍S'LL.Zl⊃ ● ● ■
tAJ l I '
U ● ● ●
Z ■ ' ●
lU ● ● ●亡⊃ ● ● ●
Z t JJ=LJJ 4:LAJ血.LLJU l力tJJJ O3 I:
E}=至∋tこuZ I
< LLl のJp) I n:⊃0 4
葺巴一一Ea:ロLL.
tP(亡Ldこ=
¥:∃
百A
寸▼-
LLJ」
守二=
tヽ
o
35
>●
> -
●>.1事
>■ L
t♪ llし 亡●
し IIJLd =u
.E)亡
q O`○ コ ●■ ■■■■ Z J,IO ■ tI
J= LJ C 亡■
1■一 っ
O C ■■ ∈L O I) t?上 ▲J コ ■■
ト 4 tT) U)
■■ ■■ >0 ~ t
召 ミ ...> rlUI E L
ヽ■ Bl●・
○=コ
▲J
qFコ
=
こ1
1■
Z:
一⊃」u
>・
也Z
lrLLJト
ト
⊃A(〟
蛋■●
I>・> r)< r)
望 o.piコN■tA. UO ● ● ■
● ● ●
LLJ . + +
tJ ●● ●
Z p f I
当:::
喜u:轟塁;捕g謹こ軍三色.
1=
gtL,
n
lrLLl
■・・
響a(亡
<
0.
LOI
二町JJZ)
<ト
36
>Ll
>・一
It一
>.LIJ3
> L
ロl むL ⊂
QI L LLJ(; む
1■ 上I ⊂
∈ ○`ロ コ ー ・●・l Z A.L
O ll lロ
.⊂u モ ⊂
■ 一 一 コ
中 C I+ ∈I. O I) E?
.⊂J コ 11
ト くⅠ n u)
■■ 一- >E) -1 9J3 Z:∈ ヽ ■●> rl
tJ7 Z: L、′ ○
こ:
○▼●
▲′
q14:
小■l
q[
Z:
l⊃」LJl
>・
3t:≡
∝tJJ
l■
トコ
ILU)
Z
⊂I■■
I
;I
>< q)uコ: t8 rl
しPlq)lL¥`⊃
● ・■
LLl+ I
p
U● ●
●
Z J I I
ILL IP
+
⊂l● ●
●
岩-A:'缶血.LJJ LJJ (b
岩ゴ至雪
d=G妻〒1王LJJl tJ)J r> I Lr)⊃0 くこロJZ:~ Z:I Al王
αロIL
【nl=
TT]こ=
LLl=l工
EE
aA.
tD▼一
Lil
_∫のaト・
37
>■
>-
●v >
【J・I- L
P 書L ⊂
4J I. tAJ⊂ bLJJ J) ⊂
C O■ロ コ ー ヽ・・< Z ●■
0 I1 1】
.⊂u ∈ ⊂
■ 一 L~ コ■ ∈ l・I CL 0 L) t>
.⊂JJ コ ー
ト < U) Lr)
■■ .ヽ >○ 一■ OI) Z:∈ ヽ -●> rltn Z: L.
1~ t)⊂=
○
▲l
■∝
P
+
こ二
Z=
亡】」LLJ
■■
>
O2:
∝LLI
L=「=
コT■
UI
Z⊂I
I
巨=
I< n
.rT.=
-
すPILL. 1I rl
~
Q〉く
【打= = =
冒:::LJL +
4 +
:至】= i:
=
Z ● ■ ●
LLI 'f
a:lL A: uLLJ LLl uJ l乃q J4=
篭己妻宇J LAJ m∃31等Z∝NJ=
田>■> -●ヽ′ >t>ゝ LEI Oし 亡L L. LLl亡 ■LJJ I) ⊂{ OtI コ ー t>I1 之 ■JE) 1 tI.⊂ U ∈ ⊂■ ・一 一 っ■ C ■■ 6L. O J) PJ= ▲′ コ ィ■ト < u) の一 ・- >○ ・■ ●.0 =弓 ヽ ■■> NtJ7 Z= L- 0こコOJ}■α:■=■=a.」也>■らZ==(どLAJ:=コIコ(LtJ)at⊃■■I妄 で聖。孟荒島モ:I.LJJ + ' +S..::LLJ 4 + +n t r +Z ' +4:萱Tg萱写l王tJJ trL室蔓こ誓∝t⊃LA.∽lこLAJ_≡LJJ差等ACO」一iiu_∫≡至至1工ト
田ヽ39
◆l
亡
⊃
U;の
.」
亡⊂=
.)i
E1
⊂=・■●U
●●
■●・
l●■
L.1J
b O上I U七っ U
Z
lつ .Ll
g とl 宅て 冨J:EL 7
I.]J妄言 5
当ZtLl
亡I■■
⊂l三■l●
」arlr
冒[=巨l
4Ji
至也0iT)
..T!U ¢
≡ 8.
%l=--tAJ . I .
■・■ ■ ■ ■
= ・ ● I
< f I D
喜:;iト d:u
‥
‡‥・.‥慧
∴千t:i:,I
:::!?40
●J
亡
=】
ul∽
.」
⊂
J(
▲l
⊂=
U一
(IL tl■ OJ⊃ UCコ
リ
ZO JJO リ ■
【司=j = =
-1宅 L: -
ヽ O EL I
J ~~
E:LAJ < l王 =
LAJU
ZU
【一■■
Uヱ■・■
」
l⊂I:
∝⊂】Z
トa
l⊂」
a⊃
I:(ど(⊃LL.
」aU l■
:==
4: O
TI =
工凸LJJ Q + -
=●
● ●
き:::Z 4 + r
=) ● ● ■
tl)f
●Q:> dE LLJ
田「「‥・
/:I
●・
「
::::
・∴
・I
:I・‡
・・/
:・
=
;‥‡:
∴・
:・=
・・;:・
・・∴
41
I.
.;:.
・-.
T.:..
・・・・:I
・・:二.
i
・.;:Tt;tt……
◆J
⊂
:⊃
互Ul
」
⊂
LI
JJ
亡GJ
リ
ヽト
■卜し ●L 0L) U∈コ リ
Z: '1
O ▲lO L) d【司 ⊂= = ニー ∈
.亡'l
ヽ O A tl」 ■J ■■ ⊂tAJ < q ●■
享:_=iI-i.
UU王tJ)
亡I==1
I)2:
」4=(亡DI‥三
=:
a
1王」く⊂⊃■=∝
⊂lLL
JEI
U ・○l■l
▼●
A: 0■■
A. ■● ∩l=ト
l■● ● ●
■■■●
●●
EjI室室至:::tn
L
4C:r-<
[.l缶岩:g琶妻α:U Z l
ぎ冒,・堅了弓コ ヒヨ
LJJ IL=ニコ
lLロ
tJIF■LLJ
[=tAJ
毒【亡
a(L
42
I::::::
J}
亡
⊃
【けtn
」
⊂
■「
■■
亡A)
U
こ=
L+
し ■4I OJ) U∈
⊃ u
2:0 ■l
O U ■O
'44 q
l< E E~
ヽ Q A 4IJ ■J ■■ 亡
LLl < `=-
LLJU
≡rrT・
【⊃
U2:
」aI:lrFi]2:
「=く=
a」i⊃=∝0LJ,
」
EJ EtlU ~
喜 8.d_O n寸
EエtAJ + ' I
■■■ ● ● ●
i: ' I '
a J ' +
Z t ・ I
:⊃ ● ■ ●∽ ・
●α:ト ∝ LAJ
(王LLJ山l乃I:J dl=
白=至∃EEtJZ [= LJJ Lr)=■ワ1 ql
I-0 1工∝~=
tJJLコ:=:
LL.
⊂】
tl)
αhJ
-
u)
LJaLZ:aFl
円田43
・:
I::.
∴..:::
‥-:
I:
:=''Lt7・:
I::-
I,...-I:
●J
一
⊂
=I
tI)∽」
亡
.▲
▲J
⊂
■
LT]
ヽ・
こ=
I
I)
U
U
▲J
=
≡
■■A⊂
L
●
.D
∈コ
Zらウ リ
O 一■■ Cヽ 0」 ▲l
LAJ q:
I.~.:
rrTU王tAJ
q-
(JZl■
JIヒjlld=⊂l
a
二=
a
4Jく⊂:⊃I:(亡(⊃LL
」{(J ■■■■ OA:■■ NA. ・○
-■
エリLAJ I + +
■■■ ■ ■
工 ● ■ ●
a ' J I
Z ' I '
=l ● + f
u) I ●4:I- α:LAJ
…喜誓.等=
LLJ 【ハ=r7 t mi=二≠ :∃
4:~Z:u(L=「=
l⊥
〔I
Lrl
dETトLd
吉(こ一工A.
.il:.'::二:.
・二.-:享
':
l・'::
・・二∴
::I:i
‥●・■1
7:.
:.:.i.::田44
■I
亡
⊃
Ln∽」
⊂
・▼■
.3(
J'J
⊂二
・■lU
こ:
;コ
し 中書 O
.OU
eコ リ
ZO ▲l
O U ll
O 一 ■ ■・l C
.E:■■
ヽ ○ & ■」 ■J 一 ⊂LAJ 4 1王
I1
: :I
::I:
l■
UZLLJ
白●■
U
I●・●
」a=FilOZ
ト一Ⅰ
l王」a
蛋Fi【】LL.
」aU Cl= ●■
a: '
妄呈e宍uJ ・ ● ●
l■l ● A +
左-.::Z r ● ●
コ ● ● ●
tn ● ●d=I- d:LL[
45
田
立
I-
I
:I;・
JJ
⊂
⊃
[JilUl」
亡
.i
■J
⊂●
U
ヽ■
l●■
L ■1● ○▲l UCコ リ
ZO ▲Jら
u ■
○ ・一 ■ ■・1 C J: .~ヽ O EL II
_l▲▲ It ⊂
LJJ < く ●■
I:.-I.I:.
T-=-;
=i
O・
℡○・L~rl
l⊂
● ■ ●
●
●(⊂d= tJL
岩室萱Sl等a.~ Ei
tdUZU凸
UZ
義之
lトi
l壬
表書告LL.
iU=
A:
隻LLI
■l
毒5D3ト・
壬Qα
≡ト
冒畠dI
5ト・
誓EE
a4.
田i三
46
∩
_三三≦三A:
::I
-■■
◆J
⊂
コ
n
∽」
亡・■1
1
■l
⊂三
・JU
⊂=
ヽト
l■
し■
● OL) Ue)
LJ
Z -O J,I
8_u . 1d
こ 吉EEL
召J J,J - E:LLl < 4 -
●○・小
◆■○
ト○・【トー○・ ●
4<rl f
\>「
>-
PL
●
⊂
LLl
lE)■■
○.⊂■
=L
ド
一一 LOi)
CI
tnF
irリ
望tJJ
lコ1■●
U
Z■■
」a
=∝(⊃a
ト
a
く王」<⊃Elr⊂ILL
」iU IZ)
= d:
妄言巳責LLl
4t 4
● ● ■
■■ ● ● ■
J= ● ● -< 4 0 .
蛋:::W4
'4:
SE当喜誓盛…宇
きS.誓聖監"I≡
rr)
(⊃
の
d:u[=
LLJ・∃a
!血.
(O~bJ
」也
l王㌢=
47
■J
⊂
⊃
OIU)
」
ri-
..■
●′
亡●
u
■■ヽト
ヽ■
し ■tr El-D tJ<コ リ
ZO ▲J
告 と. ‡ぐ 喜J:EL 7.J
ノ ●■ ⊂
LAJ < < l■
LLJUZLLJ
l⊃I-1
宴
Ja⊂(rロI
左Fl
要Z:
51▲
表口 n■● D(r ●■●
・■r)
皇丘plI)
LA1 4 + *
~+ t t
r■ ● ●
4 J I ●
芦;i;・慧筆墨【亡U Z )
諾・望LE~t:
JAILエ・=
lL¢
【∩
缶l~
萱l工
霊(L
lヽ
1NT1
貞ト
竃
48
.■l
⊂
:⊃
m〃l
」
⊂■l
.Z:
■J⊂
■
u
こ=
■●L l1■ OL) Uモコ
U
ZO J■O I) ll
O ●t 4 q-■ ∈
.⊂■■
ヽO
EL IJ
_JJJ
- (tJJ < l⊂ H
";;I,:?:=-i
ILLUZLJJ
ら●■■■
UZ■■■
Jl王Ea:na
ト・a
aJ<=】二亡lとQLL
」<U ■■
-1 トEE '11 dJロ(しィ■rJ r)tZLLJ ● ● ●
H4 4 L
I: ■ 。 。
葦::::⊃● 。 -
り ● ●B:ト 4:LLJ4LJJ u 【qI:J凸Z=
b=当享tEIJZ I三等.盟トO <
LU監~r=ト■
LL
O
さi1
1とLLl
ド
昌1王4:a4.
CO~`■」ぎ
E・ト
.■l
⊂
⊃
lnUl
」
亡
■i
▲J
⊂■
・l■リ
l◆・
■l・・
L. b■ OJ) UCコ リ
ZO JJ
O u d
O 一 ■ ■
p4 ∈.⊂
■■ヽ O A ~」 ▲J ■■ ⊂LLI < l壬
=
:・
・;
uL一
ItAJ
亡l■■
UZ
■」
iLj・(亡l⊃Z
L=巨<
a」ll
至tZ:
OLL.
」iU nl- 11CE *・■ OL n
皇aN4LAJ ' t +
■■■l● ● ■
Z: 4 + I
< 4 4
Z I I I
:⊃ ● ■ ●
琶3'垂至2r-u三千
きaT・誓⊂亡N1:
uJ (Lコ:ト
LL.⊂l
tI)Q:LLlト【汀=<α
<
tL
q)1NTrj」至aL=
'L
-::::.
∴∴●
∴・ :.:
50
∴・
唖
▲J
亡
=)
n:りII,
亡一
..I
JJ
⊂
三1
・■■
U
l●・
盲U
U
▲J
■■一
■⊂
/
=
.⊂A
■■
pd
r)Y) q>~ O
■● 」】●■
●
o I)N rl▼■
●■
r1■
.Oeコ之
00 u
O -1・< tヽ Q」 ●JLLJ <
- A. -
El >I) 81> >:吃 [ij
L
=⊂
LLl
一0
0
.亡=
●L
.⊂ト
三
ぴItd【⊃
UZ●・■
」
壬(亡l⊃王
l■<
lr
さ至∝l⊃iTl
」
8■■ C)∝
蛋立nd岳tAJ L t +
-● ■ ■
E[TJ⊃ ● ● ■¢I ●
●丘:
§ヨ萱琶払享子
≡萱こ望=ト・
LL.
ロ
ql【rluト
響4
!4.
○
(りLJJrl
守一
l
':''-二.I:
ラ:I:::7
∴J:-・
・
=■●-
.I:
・・・.I:・"I.:
・・
・∴-・
:.;〒●‥・
弓
・・:・
51
;・.::
◆J
⊂⊃
互∽
」
亡
`■l
.I
■J
亡=
t)
■l・
■●・
L ■■ 0
.E)U
∈) UZ .'1
O ▲J0 tJ tIO 一■ ■ ■一 6 J: l.Iヽ O & II
」 ■J ■■ ⊂
LLJ l壬 く ●■
>●
>、t>
i⊂
u
l⊃
○
.亡=
=し
∫ト
・-I:.:
丁:_:::
盟Zu亡一■■■
UZ:=_
さ○:
冒し=く
E!
i妄α⊂〉1▲
さロ M■・l ●
EL: -■~
I
i
3-2
■l
=
亡⊃
n
UIJ
⊂-~
■J
亡
「
U・■l
ヽ■
■ト
L. 血色 OA U
∈コ L1
2: d
O JJ
O u 巾
○ ,一 ■ ■▼■ ∈
.亡■■
ヽ O EL Gl」 .リ 4< ⊂LJJ l工 一正 l■
当Iu
[±二=コ
U
ヱ■■
」
章毎Z
ト一王
5(エコこA:[i】h
■
aU
=r).
妄。畠真l山王
■ ■ ●
~ I f f
蔓;:.;⊃● ● ■
tz) I I I
妄u'岳監凸dgz:至dEトコZI
Captions of Figures
Fig. 1 Best-fit values of f for light-ion sputtering, where the ratio
of f to伺is plotted as a function of the mass ratio H2/Hl・
the solid line is calculatedfrom eq.(8).
Fig. 2 Best-fit values of Oopt for light-ion sputtering, where the
best-fit OoptYs are plotted against n and the solid line is
七be 七heoretical curve calculated from Eq. (12).
Fig. 3 The best-fit values of f for relatively high-energy heavy
ion sputtering, where the solid line corresponds to
Sigmund fs of m= i/3・
Fig・ 4 The ratios of the best-fit ffs to sigmund fs as a function
主
of n- i - (Eth//E)2, where the solid line corresponds to
Eq. (17).
Fig. 5 The best-fit values of 900- Oopt as a function of中′ where
the solid line corresponds to
oop七= 900 - 286中0・45・
Figs. 6 through 58
The normalized sputtering yield Y(0)/Y(0) as a function of
the angle of incidence, where the so.lid lines in these
figures are best-fit curves to the presenJ-._ empirical fclrmula,■
and the solid lines with x marks show the results calculated
by putting the average values of f and ∑ into the present
empirical formula. The average parameters of f and ∑ are
easily calculated using the parameters listed in Table 5
through 18.
-53-
′一ヽ
▼-●
コEヽヽ
[亡」
Eミ_㌔
⊂⊃
O 宅⊃==弓 ==
∃=
⊂⊂
【ピ
ーつ
[!iコ
⊂こ
コE
Lr) q・ MN -■
コリ/∫
-54-
l・」
●
t71
・■」h
〈⊃
N
●
bl
・■臥
gヨヨkI9ヨ8)ヨ⊃Nヨ8ⅠコNl jO ヨ19NU
-55-
L3
ヒ垂ヽ●ヽ
=
畠芦
当云竺岩
:==1
トーJ
喜壷m
8亡
亡⊃
L」
ヽ●ヽ
~■亡:
ゴ
∈
t)
LD⊂⊂ =⊃ O .-
(工トー⊂⊂コE>∽
●■ ●● ●■ ●■ ●● ●■
xx-of
=⊃= J【ヒ:Q
UZ 【こrLJA_
■■ ●● ■● ●● ○■
oE]○
良lO
●
lJl●
∈苅
●
ひl
・■h
LrJl∫l
N
⊂⊃
.」芦王~
I-
コE=)
H=i5
>く 三
笠喜山 トー
コ= ト
ト =l
n_
トー ∽
【=戸当
LLJモ⊃
こ事]≡=コ
tg [
山 >一
己左芦] TF
z =
I.・■
L」
LL O
宅⊃
山
■一
重]
Z
(=
√~ミ
リー
LD
声i]
■■■
I-
′■lヽ ■■ヽ ●
O7M J
Ln「ヽ 【こ
【 ′1 ′・ヽO)のトートートー●{ ●一卜-⊂⊂(工⊂亡一一-■山Uし)U
⊂⊂(エ【こ∝だ>
-.、--■山u」山ZZZ
=)===の山
UZZLLJ==
G空[事】
暮 I l ■山■
〕亡l⊃ dE)
亡ビL3= ■ ■ ●
q:=Zu=:)己
●● ●● ●● ■● ●● ●■
OOE)甘米粥
ldo8 - 06
-518-
tL1
●
D
・rlh
∫-■■
匹耳
l⊥J
亡ヒ
t5
匹E
【=lヽ一J
山
EE
巨垂
LLj
⊂⊃ト■l
[事コ
岳表=
LL
E)
rq
J
【声]
=こ
亡⊂
l芦~■与
山
l⊥J【ヒ
Lコロ句
⊂】■ヒニニナ
Il」
【室二
≡
山
⊂⊃=
∈事]
≡=
LL
亡つ
山」
一っ
:己
⊂こ\D
●
ロ1
・rlh
l∫)O L/)
N ▼一
【0】人/【8】人
-59-
■■■ヽ
山
LL)
⊂ヒ:
担」
u」
[垂二t:;==チ
FE
[事二
Z
J苛
⊂⊃==
:事∃
=こ=
l」
[i]
Jt■∈
t5
=
⊂こ
′■l■ヽ
ld
LL)
【亡
L3
山
⊂⊃ヽ■■l
l⊥l
【琶
=
p□
⊂⊃=
U
=「==1
LL
t⊃
山
」
L3
Z
⊂こ r-
●
b1
・rih
-60-
[iiこ「
山
山
【ヒ
Lコ
山
⊂ユiTI亡!コ
山
U
:こLJJ
⊂⊃==]
U
:こ=
lL
E)
山
」
t5
=
CE:
′■ヽ
llJ
llJ
【ピ
L3
u」⊂⊃`
J
山
【事二
Z
叩t
【⊃L==]
U
:こ==]
LL
モ⊃
世耳
」
t3≡
【こ(D
●
bl
・rlh
⊂⊃l∫】
【0】▲/【8】人
-61-
′一ヽ
[匹」
rrg
匹音
:≒」
山
⊂⊃ヽ■l■l
LU
U
巨41
Ll」
⊂⊃=
【事】
≡=
LL
L垂]
Tt
■句
tコ
Z
⊂⊂
r~i
芦互
Il」
隻;音
L3
J&
⊂⊃ヽ■●′
山
U
巨≠
匹互
⊂】=
【事]
≡=
LL
[宮
LiJJ
t5
歪 o,●
bl
・■Bl
l∫)
【0)A/【8)A
-62-
ド:⊥
T互
山
【ピ
t3
LJJ
⊂ヨミ_.I
ILl
【事三
=
耳互
⊂⊃I-■
【事コ
巨}==]
LL
t⊃
山
_ji)
=
亡亡
⊂)
pl
●
bl
・rlh
∫■~■ミ
IJJ
tJJ
∝くヱI
LLJ
⊂⊃ヽ■一
llJ
こ事二
巨≠
l▲J
⊂⊃=
【事】
巨⇒ト■
LL
t⊃
tJJ■]
L5
=己
CE:
⊂〉l∫一⊂I
▼-■
【0)A/柑)A
-63-
l■ll■ヽ
LLJ
uJ
(ど
Eq
竺互
⊂】モノ
Lu
ロ■
巨≠
LLJ
⊂⊃
L==
【粥
=己■・{l
LL
亡⊃
l山
」
t5
巨頭⊂⊂
【=iこ1
LqJq
亡ヒ
L3
[l事]
⊂⊃ヽ■JI
LJ,J【事】
g5ii
LFt
⊂⊃-
U
巨≠L=コ
l」こ垂】
LLI
J
t3
Z rJeE: r I
■
bl
・lJh
t∫)
(0】人/【8)A
-64-
=iこコ
山
山
【ヒ
t3山
⊂⊃ヽ一一
LJJ
こ事二≡
山
⊂⊃==]
U
巨音:=コ
IL
t⊃
rrt
l■[
t.⊃
巨⇒
⊂⊂
Lid
汀互LJ}
α:
t3LJJ
⊂⊃ヽ■■
山
U
巨垂
l▲J
⊂1==
[E
≡巨==]
lL
亡〉
LLJ
_.∫Lヨ
:こ Nq: rl
●
bl
・rlh
∽ ⊂)
5己 biE
【0)A/【gll
-65-
J■■ヽ
l⊥l
l山
【ピ匪]
山
⊂⊃ヽ-∫
l山
【事二
巨1
山
⊂⊃=
:■亡
≠iトーI
IJ
」卓]
l⊥l
J
tコ
巨肇
⊂【:
5i:
r」
●
D
・r・1h
′■ヽ
rFt
世事
亡ヒ
L3
山
⊂】ヽ■′
uJ
EE
Z
LU
⊂⊃■・■l
芦二
≡=
tL
亡)
LU
J
L5≡
⊂⊂
⊂)l′〉⊂)▼-■
【0)A/柑】人
-66-
i:■■■~■芸
事互
Lil
α::
t3山
⊂ユI-
l▲J
コ事】
Z咋葛
⊂⊃=
:事□
声1=
LL
∈⊃
l⊥」
」
しコ
≡
⊂⊂
√~~一~i
l⊥J山
亡ヒ
(.コ声互
⊂⊃ヽ■■■l
LAJ
U
:≡
匹互
⊂】=
:室】
≡L==]
Lrq
t⊃
rrq
J
Lコ
歪 ヨ●
bl
・rlh
⊂)
jiZ:
【0)A/【8)A
-67-
■■■ヽ
l▲」
LJJ
亡ヒ
L5
LiJ
⊂】ヽ一■l
山
【事]
;こ
l▲」
⊂⊃=
【事】
≡[==]
l」
モ⊃
山
」
tコ
Z
⊂⊂
LLl
r」
●
bl
・rlA
=二■i■二「
芦互
一事
EL:
一っ
LU⊂⊃
ヽ■■l
l⊥JU
Z
l⊥J
⊂ユー
[事]Z=
L」
モ⊃
LU
J
W
≡
【こ
⊂】lJ)⊂)
■-■
【0)A/【8)A
-68-
∫-■ヽ
Tq
山
【ヒ
L3荘司
⊂lr■≡=」
芦互
[事】
Z
u.∫
⊂⊃=
i)
巨室=
LL
∈⊃
世耳
_」Lコ巨⇒
G:
′■ヽ
山
l⊥】
【ヒ
Lコ山
⊂⊃ヽ-■l
王耳
[事三
巨音
L▲J
⊂コ■-■
【事二
≡トーI
IJ
E⊃
山
J
tコ
歪 ヨ●
bl
・■h
⊂I ⊂) ⊂⊃
Pq N r11 O⊂) ⊂⊃
[qi】 岩⊂〉 ⊂⊃ ⊂)
の r\ く○
【0)A/【9)A
-69-
⊂⊃
⊂) ⊂⊃- O)
【⊃ ⊂】 ⊂) ⊂) ⊂)
Ln 寸 rq N r・.l
T11 ▼■l ▼・■ -■ ▼】■
乙ー
LAJ
ll」
亡ピ
tコ
LAJ
⊂⊃㌔_..∫
l▲J
こ事]
巨≠
LJJ
⊂ユL==]
芦二
F5iト■l
とL宅⊃
Jt
■[
もコ
巨享≠⊂⊂
jiZ
r1
●
bl
・rlh
■■■ヽ
芦互ロー
亡ピLコ
LJJ
⊂⊃ヽ一
匹互
【事】
Fi
l▲J
⊂】=
【事】
巨垂=
LL
t⊃
匹互
」
t5
≠≠
⊂⊂
⊂)l′〉-=I▼・■l
【0)A/【8)A
-70-
-■
山
u」
亡巴
L5
山
⊂⊃-■■
l⊥l
【事星
=こ
山
⊂⊃LZ=
【事】
巨垂I-■
LL
t⊃
TtJ
L5
巨1⊂l:
r~~i
軍司
LJJ
8亡
く.⊃
山⊂⊃ヽ■一■
l山
【事]
と⇒山
⊂】=
EE
=トー■
LLt⊃
山
■句
L5
巨⇒
【= ⊂O
rl
●
ロl
・「†h
-71-
■■ヽ
山
山
∝
Lコ
一山⊂】ヽ一′
LLJ
こ事]
≡
山
⊂⊃==]
U
Z=
lL
モ⊃
Tq
J
一っ=
CE:
O\
rl
●
bl
・■h
J■■ヽ
u」
l▲」
α:
くっ山
⊂⊃ヽ一1′
1互
U
戸当
山
⊂⊃=
:事二戸≠==1
1L
t⊃
l山
J
【室二
王q:
⊂I⊂) ⊂〉
勺● rq
【0)A/柑lÅ
-72-
⊂_.⊥二】
t⊥l
山
亡ヒ
担二
LU
⊂⊃こ「■亡::」
rq
【I∃
=
l⊥l
⊂ユト→■l
芦二
巨≠トーI
LL
∈)
山
.」くっ
:こq=
⊂>
3iE]
●
bl
・r・1臥
′■■ヽ
iTT]
耳耳
【ヒ
(.コLJJ
⊂ユこ「≡コ
l▲J芦]
≡
声互
⊂⊃=
:事]
Z=
LL
亡〉
山
■野
L3
巨≠〔E
⊂⊃Ln
【0)A/【81人
-73-
∫-I
山LiJ
【ヒ
:室二
LLlロヽ一■
山
U
=
山
⊂l~
[事二
===
LL
モ⊃
l▲J
J
亡コ
;こ
(亡
l芦±~こ
山山
tヒ
L3
山
⊂⊃ヽ.●■
運貫
こ事二
;こ
山
⊂⊃==]
U
=こ==」
lJ」
モ⊃
山
」
亡コ
=
□:rJEii
●
bl
・■b
t∫)
柑!Å/柑)A
-74-
L_J
u」
山
(ど
ーコ
山
⊂⊃-′
山
U
Fiil
山一=i==1
U
Z
l・・・■l
lL
t⊃
山
」
L5
=こ
(工
N
N
●
D
・rl臥
芦与
Il」山
亡ピ
LJ
llJ
[垂]ヽ■′
山
U
Z
llJ
E3=
U
==
LL
t⊃
山」
屯コZ
(こ
[≠]Ul⊂】
●-■
(0)A/【87人
-75-
Liこ
LA)
山
【ヒ
担]
山
口ヽ-■
山
U
:≡
山
∈垂]■-1
DE
===
1L
t)
l上∫
■【
亡コ
巨室亡こ
Eiil
N
●
bl
・■h
′■ヽ
一事
t⊥j
亡ヒ
【寧]
山
E)ヽ■■l
l山
U
巨垂
芦耳
⊂】E==]
p聖
≠≠こ=コ
LL
E〉
声互■E
Lヨ
≠≠
⊂こ
⊂I==EiE
【0)A/柑l人
ー76-
rq
′-I
LLJ
u)
(ど
くコ
t▲J
⊂⊃ヽ一
山
U
=
l▲J
⊂⊃=
U
=ー
LL
己垂】
LLJ
J
一っ
=q:
=
Lリ
山
【亡
くコ
l山⊂⊃-■
LLJ
U
≡
l▲J
Q==1
[I二
巨当■一I
IL
t⊃
山
」Lコ
孟 岩●
bl
・rlh
ー■N
【0!人/【8)A
-77-
Fq■■■l′I
-ヽ
LLJ
芦事
亡ヒ
L3
山
⊂⊃ヽ__I
四ら
U
:こ
IIJ
⊂⊃≡=コ
リ
BJコ=コ
L」
[i】
山
⊆目
t3
≡
⊂こ
Ln
N
●
bl
・rth
■■`-I
山
芦旦
亡ヒ
(.コ
芦互
【:⊃ヽ■-■
l⊥J
U巨一
LU⊂⊃ト・-■
U
≡[王=
し」
E)
uJJ
L3声i
⊂こ
⊂⊃lJ)
【0)A/【8】人
-78-
■■11
山
山
∝
【些」
山
⊂】ヽ一■■
a)【事二
=
tJJ
⊂ユL==
U
:こ=
LL
モ⊃
山
」
t3
≡
⊂⊂
′■■ヽ
t⊥jrFt
EL=
L5LJ,J
⊂⊃【ーl亡コ
rFq
U
=
l▲」
⊂⊃トーI
U
戸室l-■
lJ
t⊃
山
」
tコ
= u)⊂こ N
●
b1
・rlh
ー■■FiF
=H人/【8)A
-79-
rr):≡;Lt)
lユiJ
rq
LU
【どこ串]
Tg
⊂⊃ヽ一
声旦
E事二
:こ
耳互
⊂】=
【事】
巨⇒=
LL
E⊃
uJ
J
t5
声音
(工
L i
llJ
LU
亡ヒ
亡コ
連句
⊂⊃lニ=
u}
:事∃
I
山
⊂⊃トーl
【事二
≡
=
LL
E)
声耳
■∃
【室二
言 Nr-●
けl
・rl空っ
l′I
⊂)E=」
(O)A/f8)A
-80_
r■iJ
山
匹互亡ピ
こ室i
山
⊂】ヽ■J
t⊥I
【事二
=
山
⊂】==
U
:己こ=コ
L」
亡)
p]
」
一っ
ヱ
⊂⊂
Liコ
山
世互
亡ヒ
L3Tq
⊂コヽ■■■
l▲」
【ぢ
=こ
LLJ
⊂l[==
U
==
LLモ⊃
山
_Jくコ
歪NCO
●
D
・11b
l∫〉⊂I==」
【0)A/柑】人
-81-
′-ヽ
山
一▲J
8ビt3
山
⊂⊃ヽ■■■
l⊥J
U
巨頭
LJ
⊂⊃=
Dq
≡=
l⊥_
亡⊃
山
」
L⊃
igil
⊂亡
CI
EiE
●
ひ
・rl臥
ーコ
LU
l山
巨∃
tコ
p[
⊂⊃ヽ-■l
l⊥J
:事∃
≡
一旦
⊂⊃=
【事コ
i5)==
l」
宅⊃
uJJ
L5;こ
⊂⊂
⊂)■・・■瓦瓦
(0)A/(O)A
-82-
LLr]≡;Ln
-I
山
山
CE:
しっ
IIJ⊂】ヽ-
LrT
こ■二=
⊂⊃トーI
U
=[==∃
lL
t⊃
山
」
t3
Z
【亡
⊂〉
5)7
●
bl
・r)臥
[=iiコ
uJ
LU
【ヒt5
[町
⊂⊃-∫
rq
こ■]
≡
llJ⊂1==
U
≡==
■Lモ⊃
担町
」
:室∃
;こ
(工
⊂I==[i]
【0】人/柑)A
-83-
FqUl
∫■`~`こ
「ロilJ
【ビ
t3LJJ
:垂]ヽ■一
LJJ
【事コ
巨≠
LA]
⊂】~
【事]
≡[==
l▲_
∈I
Fg
J
L3巨室
亡こ
L__J
LU
LAJ
Cビ
L3
LJJ
⊂⊃ミJ
LLJ
[事二
と⇒
u)
⊂】==
[司
≡~
tJ_
モ⊃
山
」
くコ
Fj
c= 宍●
t7l
・rlh
r==[亡]
(0】人′柑)A
-84-
巨i二■■Ul
′-ヽ
LL)
rq
【ヒ
【室]
一軍
⊂lヽ一1■
山
【芦:
=
山
⊂l
==
U
=L==
tL
t⊃
LJJ
J
t5
≡(こ
∫~■■■ミ
山
LJJ
也::
[】旦
LJJ
⊂:iI-∫
山
■]
=
LAJ
⊂一=
U
I=
LL
亡〉
l▲J
J
u
:こ N【⊂ M
●
bl
・rlh
l∫1
(0)A/(0)A
-85-
′■■■
LL)
Fn
(ど
t5
LLJ
⊂3ヽ■J
l▲JPE
巨⇒
l⊥l
⊂ユC==
【事:
巨室ト■l
lL
宅⊃
LA,a
J
t5=
⊂⊂
■■ヽ
p]
TE
【ピ
u
LJ}
⊂lヽ■■l
山
【事二
巨⇒
ロ耳
⊂⊃=
こ事二
戸⇒こ==」
1Lモ⊃
運耳
_」(コ
巨音
⊂E ∩
5il
●
b1
・11払
lJl
【0】人/柑lÅ
-86-
l■■ヽ
uJ
l⊥l(ど
【室]
L山
口t._____=
LU
【事】
:己LU
こ±「ト叫l
:事己
=l・・・■
LJ_
⊂⊃
Jq
⊆]
一っ巨垂
⊂亡
正i
Ei*
●
b1
・rllil
ご==:=i
LU
LLJ
(ど
くっtiJ
⊂】ヽ一一
LJ,1こ!E
≡
LJJ
C)l・・■l
[事]
===]
LL
L垂]
LU
_∫一っZ
(=:
⊂ILn
【0】人/柑)A
-87-I
■■ヽ
lムI
LLJ
亡ヒ
t3
LU
@<t___チ
LLJ
こ事二
巨当
u」
⊂⊃[===
こ事二
巨当~
LL
∈⊃
LA)
■]
:革]巨≠
eE
Ln5il
●
bl
・lJh
√~も
Lu
LU
亡ヒ芦]
山
⊂⊃ヽ■一
LLJ:■
ヒ≠Lq
⊂⊃■一l
こ事コ
巨≠■-●
LL
E⊃
LA)
」
く.⊃
と≠⊂⊂
⊂l-FiE
【OI人′【8)A
-88-
Pr):言】Ul
.芦■~≒
uJ
LJ
`ヒ:
L3
LLJ
a-∫
uJU
=
山
⊂⊃=
U
≡■一I
LLt⊃
Ld
J
tコ=
【=
\D
r)
●
か
・rJh
l■■lヽ
LJJ
l▲」
【ヒ
t3LU
⊂⊃ヽ■■
l⊥lU
;こ
Lit
[垂]=
【事]
≡l■■一I
l」
宅つ
連句
⊆]
L3=
(こ
⊂)▼-■N
(0)A/‖=人
-89-
rq=1[一iコ
デモ
LJ,J
LLJ
(ど
L9
1∪⊂ユヽ一
山
[事二
=
rq
⊂⊃==]
【事二≡
■・・・■
LJ_亡⊃
rq
_JL5戸弓
くE
「iZ
5i
●
bl
・■h
J■~■~こ
山
山
(ど
ーコ
l▲J
⊂】ユノ
LJJ
芦二
戸⇒
山⊂ユ
=
U
戸室=
lL
宅⊃
L山
■[
Lコ
≠弓(=
⊂〉●-■[亡」
(OI▲/柑l人
-90-
Pr)寸リー
L==
一山
山
【と
く.コ
匹句
⊂1ヽ-
l▲J
【事二
=
山
⊂l[==1
U
Z==
lL
t⊃
l▲J
JL3
=
【こ
CO
【ii
●
D1
・rl臥
■-I
山
山
【ピ
ーコ
l⊥J
⊂l■こ_.∫
世葺
こ事二
Z
l⊥l【⊃=
U
=コ=
l」
宅⊃
LLj
_」t3Z
(亡
⊂)I-■l:壬】
(0)A/【8)A
-91-
rql′〉
[iiコ
LLJ
tJ}
巨ヨ
L3
uJ
⊂lt==_二T
l⊥l【司
=E
LAJ
⊂⊃ー
[事]
ヒ≠I-●
u」宅⊃
l⊥l
J
t3
≠j
(⊂
ご■■■■■■ミ
FTq
LJJ
【ヒ匪」
■1J⊂⊃'=
uJ
[事】=
LLl
⊂:Iト・■l
【事]
巨i■一I
IL宅⊃
LJ}
_.IL3 gl
巨弓 5i:
(⊂●
D
・rlh
l■■FiZA
(0)A/(8】人
-92-
Pq
[iiこコ
LL3
LLJ
(ど
p毎
山
[室]i:「==
ヨ互
U=
rq
【⊃…
U
Z■■l
lL
t⊃
l⊥l芦]
t5
=
くE
′一ヽ
l上∫
LLJ
33
1コLLJ
⊂ユ■■■
山
:事二=
l⊥l
aI-■
【事コ
Zl-I
1」
モ⊃
l⊥l」
くコ
=
cE 等C
ロ1
・■h
lJl⊂I
●-■
(0)A/(e)A
-93-
l二■■二「
L山
荘旦
亡ヒ
担」
l⊥J⊂コセこ...=ざ
uJ
U
戸室
Ll」
⊂⊃トー
U
≡==]
LL
モ⊃
t⊥】■句
(コ戸≠
⊂こ
r」■可l
●
ロ1
・rlh
′■■ヽ
運旦
芦旦
亡亡
く.コ匹旦
⊂⊃㌔_=こざ
uJ
Eg
巨垂直旦
⊂⊃■■・■
U
戸弓==]
u_
E⊃
山
⊆□u
≠室
〔こ
⊂)
-94-