25
Do Now: Describe a person who comes from a civilized society. Describe a person who comes from an uncivilized society? How are they different?

Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

Do Now: Describe a person who comes from a civilized society. Describe a

person who comes from an uncivilized society? How are they different?

Page 2: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

Indian Removal Act

Page 3: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

Pre-president Andrew JacksonWho was he? A Tennessee political leader,

judge, and land spectator. A war “Hero” fighting Indians

and defeating the British at the Battle of New Orleans in 1815.

After the War of 1812 he served as a federal commissioner to negotiate treaties with the Choctaws, Chickasaws, Creeks, Seminoles, and Cherokees (all tribes in the Southeast) Jackson was known to

sometimes resort to military threats and bribery.

Got most of the tribes to give up 50million acres of tribal land

Page 4: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

I. 1828 & Andrew Jackson After a controversial defeat in 1824,

Jackson wins the presidency on a campaign that promised free land for white settlers.

Jackson began to promote the idea (first proposed by Thomas Jefferson) of moving Indians into unsettled prairie west of the Mississippi.

Noah Webster issues the first American Dictionary produced in the United States: In it the word “Savage” is defined as: n,

A human being in his native state of rudeness; one who is untaught, uncivilized, or without cultivation of mind or manners. The savages of America, when uncorrupted by the vices of civilized men, are remarkable for their hospitality to strangers, and for their truth, fidelity, and gratitude to their friends, but implacably cruel and revengeful toward their enemies

Question: What does this definition say about how white Americans viewed the Native American people?

Page 5: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

cultural assimilation: a process by which members of an ethnic minority group lose cultural characteristics that distinguish them from the dominant cultural group or take on the cultural characteristics of another group. Mosby's Medical Dictionary, 8th edition. © 2009, Elsevier.

Page 6: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

Carlisle Indian School, PA

Page 7: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

 The common schools are the stomachs of the country

in which all people that come to us are assimilated within a generation.

When a lion eats an ox, the lion does not become an ox

but the ox becomes a lion." ..Henry Ward Beecher

What do you think this quote means? Who is the lion? Who is the ox?

Page 8: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

This is Tom Torlino. He attended the Carlisle School - a special boarding school for Native American students. The picture provides both a before and after spending time at the school. The before and after photo is but one illustration NPR uses to tell the story of Native American boarding schools in the US. In a report titled “Native American Boarding Schools Haunt Many,” correspondent Charla Bear digs deep into the practices and processes used to forcibly strip young Native Americans from their heritage.

Page 9: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

The federal government began sending Native Americans to off-reservation boarding schools in the 1870s, when the United States was still at war with Indians.

An Army officer, Richard Pratt, founded the first of these schools. He based it on an education program he had developed in an Indian prison. He described his philosophy in a speech he gave in 1892.

“A great general has said that the only good Indian is a dead one,” Pratt said. “In a sense, I agree with the sentiment, but only in this: that all the Indian there is in the race should be dead. Kill the Indian in him, and save the man.”

Check out the chilling reason these schools were developed in the first place:

Page 10: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

"If the Great Spirit had desired me to be a white man 

he would have made me so  in the first place. 

He put in your heart  certain wishes and plans; 

in my heart he put other and different desires. 

Each man is good  in the sight of the Great Spirit. 

It is not necessary,  that eagles should be crows." ..Sitting Bull (Teton Sioux)

What did Sitting Bull mean when he said “it is not necessary,that Eagles should be crows?”

Page 11: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

But often, assimilation worked to erode the cultural identity of Native Americans

Page 12: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

Sun Elk, from the pueblo of Taos, recorded this experience at Carlisle:They told us that Indian ways were bad. They said we must get civilized. I remember that word too. It means "be like the white man." I am willing to be like the white man, but I did not believe Indian ways were wrong. But they kept teaching us for seven years. And the books told how bad the Indians had been to the white men - burning their towns and killing their women and children. But I had seen white men do that to Indians. We all wore white man’s clothes and ate white man’s food and went to white man’s churches and spoke white man’s talk. And so after a while we also began to say Indians were bad. We laughed at our own people and their blankets and cooking pots and sacred societies and dances.

Page 13: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

Indian Schools…

READING…

Page 14: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

In your comp book, respond to this photo. What is it saying, and how does it make you feel?

Do Now:

Page 15: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

Passed in May 1830 Sought to remove the “Five civilized tribes” from east of the

Mississippi to west of the Mississippi Question: Why were these tribes called the “Five civilized

tribes”?

II. Indian Removal Act

Page 16: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

“ Rightly considered, the policy of the General Government toward the red man is not only liberal, but generous. He is unwilling to submit to the laws of the States and mingle with their population. To save him from this alternative, or perhaps utter annihilation, the General Government kingly offers him a new home…” - Andrew Jackson Message to Congress, December 8 1930

Page 17: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

Although removal was supposed to be “voluntary” Jackson cut of payments to the tribes for previously made land deals until they moved to the West.

He also agreed with Georgia, and other southern states, that their laws controlled tribal land.

Between 1827 and 1830, Georgia, Mississippi, and Alabama dissolved the Indian governments and seized tribal land.

Tricky Tricky Mr. Jackson

Page 18: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

In 1832 the “civilized” Cherokees chose not to fight in battle as their forefathers had, but used the U.S. courts to stake their claim on their land.

The appeal reached the U.S. Supreme Court – Worcester v. Georgia - and won; The Cherokees retained the right to be independent and self governing.

Why? The federal government had former treaty obligations to protect the Indians and the Court held that federal law was superior to state law.

Afterward President Jackson is quoted as saying, “John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it” - John Marshall was the Chief Justice

Georgia Land Seizure is deemed Unconstitutional

Page 19: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

Although the Supreme Court had ruled in favor of the Cherokee, Jackson’s open refusal to enforce it gave way to Southern states ignoring it.

Georgia settlers, gold minors, and land speculators swarmed onto Cherokee lands, often seizing and destroying homes and property.

In 1832Georgia ran a lottery to distribute Cherokee land.

Leave in Peace or Stay and Suffer

Page 20: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

In 1835 A small group of Cherokees led by longtime Cherokee political leader Major Ridge, who did not represent their nation signed a treaty with the government that granted the United States “all the lands owned, claimed, or possessed "by the Cherokees.

The U.S. agreed to pay the tribe $5 million and to provide new and in the West that would never be included within any future state.

Treaty of New Echota

Page 21: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

Chief John Ross and The Treaty of New Echota

Principle chief of the Cherokees who led the tribal government and opposed the removal.

The leader in Worcester v. Georgia

Along with the Cherokee General Council, Ross rejected the Treaty of New Echota because it did not reflect the will of the Cherokee majority.

But, in 1836, the U.S. Senate ratified the treaty by ONE VOTE giving the Cherokees 2 years to leave.

More than 16,000 Cherokees defied the treaty and refused to abandon their homes including Chief John Ross and his wife.

Page 22: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

The Trail of Tears "The Cherokee are probably the

most tragic instance of what could have succeeded in American Indian policy and didn't. All these things that Americans would proudly see as the hallmarks of civilization are going to the West by Indian people. They do everything they were asked except one thing. What the Cherokees ultimately are, they may be Christian, they may be literate, they may have a government like ours, but ultimately they are Indian. And in the end, being Indian is what kills them."Richard White, Historian

Page 23: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

President Jackson completed his second term in office by the deadline for Cherokee removal in 1838.

When most Cherokees still refused to leave, the new president, Martin can Buren ordered General Winfield Scott to round up troops and force them to leave.

In the summer of 1838, Scott’s soldiers arrested about 15,000 Cherokees and marched them into primitive stockades.

Even before the long journey (on foot) poor food, limited water, filthy living conditions, and disease caused the death of an estimated 3,000 Cherokees.

In addition to the thousands who died in the stockades, another 1,000, including John Toss’ wife, died on the way west. Altogether about 25% of the tribe perished in what the Cherokees call “The Trail Where They Cried”.

Page 24: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

READING…

Page 25: Aim: How did the federal government organize the “removal“ of Native Americans in the 19 th century?

In December 1838, President Van Buren Spoke to Congress:“It affords sincere pleasure to apprise the

Congress of the entire removal of the Cherokee Nation of Indians to their new homes west of the Mississippi. The measures authorized by Congress at its last session have had the happiest effects.”

End Note: