Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati Adam Weishaupt 와 일루미나티 Q. Did Adam Weishaupt (AW) found the Illuminati? A. No, the Illuminati is a much older organization. It has existed for millennia. Q. Adam Weishaupt (이하 AW) 가 일루미나티를 만들었나요? A. 아뇨, 일루미나티는 훨씬 오래된 조직입니다. 근 천 년 동안 존재한 조직입니다. Q. Was AW a Grand Master of the Illuminati? A. Yes. He was based in Bavaria in Germany. Since he was the first Grand Master to bring the Illuminati into public awareness, he sometimes pretended that the Illuminati was a new secret society, created by him. He was thus able to avoid questions about the long history of the Illuminati, which might have revealed important clues that would have assisted the Illuminati's enemies. The Illuminati have still not provided a precise history, and reserve this information for senior initiates. (It has erroneously been claimed that AW said that the last King of Persia founded the Illuminati, and then wrote a letter to a fellow member of the Illuminati in which he admitted this was an "innocent lie". AW made no such claim and wrote no such letter, and such assertions are manifestly absurd. Why would a republican organization opposed to monarchy claim a monarch as its founder? Why would an Illuminati Grand Master write to a member about such a matter instead of discussing it in a closed session of the Illuminati, with the customary requirement of complete secrecy? It is also claimed that three princes and various barons belonged to the Illuminati. Is this likely given the Illuminati's republicanism, their opposition to aristocrats and their leading role in the French Revolution, which led to the smashing of the power of the French monarchy and aristocracy, and the creation of a French Republic?)
Microsoft Word - Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati.docAdam
Weishaupt
Q. Did Adam Weishaupt (AW) found the Illuminati?
A. No, the Illuminati is a much older organization. It has existed
for millennia.
Q. Adam Weishaupt ( AW) ?
A. , . .
Q. Was AW a Grand Master of the Illuminati? A. Yes. He was based in
Bavaria in Germany. Since he was the first Grand Master to bring
the Illuminati into public awareness, he sometimes pretended that
the Illuminati was a new secret society, created by him. He was
thus able to avoid questions about the long history of the
Illuminati, which might have revealed important clues that would
have assisted the Illuminati's enemies. The Illuminati have still
not provided a precise history, and reserve this information for
senior initiates. (It has erroneously been claimed that AW said
that the last King of Persia founded the Illuminati, and then wrote
a letter to a fellow member of the Illuminati in which he admitted
this was an "innocent lie". AW made no such claim and wrote no such
letter, and such assertions are manifestly absurd. Why would a
republican organization opposed to monarchy claim a monarch as its
founder? Why would an Illuminati Grand Master write to a member
about such a matter instead of discussing it in a closed session of
the Illuminati, with the customary requirement of complete secrecy?
It is also claimed that three princes and various barons belonged
to the Illuminati. Is this likely given the Illuminati's
republicanism, their opposition to aristocrats and their leading
role in the French Revolution, which led to the smashing of the
power of the French monarchy and aristocracy, and the creation of a
French Republic?)
Q. AW ?
A. . Bavaria .
.
.
,
.
,
.
(AW
, . AW
.
?
?
3 (, ) .
?)
Q. Did AW reject Catholicism and the Jesuits? A. Yes. He became a
Gnostic and therefore an enemy of the Satanic religions of Judaism,
Christianity and Islam. He was content to be described as a deist1)
rather than a theist. Anyone who understands Gnosticism will see
why this should be so.
Q. AW ?
A. . () . ,
.
1) . ()
.
1) 17~18 .
,
.
Q. Was WA influenced by the European Enlightenment? A. Yes. He was
a radical freethinker, but he did not go down the
atheist/agnostic2) path as so many other leading thinkers did. He
wanted to bring the light of knowledge/gnosis to those in the dark
thrall of Satan.
Q. WA ?
A. . .
2) . (,
, ) .
2) (sophists) ,
. ()
() (gnosis) ()
.
() ‘ ’ ,
Q. Was the Illuminati part of Freemasonry? A. No. Freemasonry was a
creation of the Illuminati, though it then evolved undesirably
(paradoxically due to its success in America where all the main
figures involved in the American Revolution were Masons) and
eventually became everything the Illuminati opposed i.e.
Freemasonry was corrupted and transformed itself into the very
oppressive establishment it once resisted. (The vast majority of
members of the Old World Order today are senior Freemasons.) The
Illuminati did not travel the same path as the Masons. They
remained true, steadfast and untarnished, although they have never
subsequently been able to shake off their connection to Freemasonry
in the eyes of the unenlightened and ill-informed. The Freemasons,
as a creation of the Illuminati, are not party to any secrets
unknown to the Illuminati, and were duped by the Illuminati to
protect the Illuminati's core secrets - as will be discussed in
another section.
Q. ?
A. . .
( ,
.)
. : ,
. (
. ) .
.
.
.
Q. Did WA and the Illuminati believe in perfecting human nature? A.
Yes. (As far as possible within the framework provided by
Gnosticism.)
Q. WA ?
A. . ( . )
Q. Was the Illuminati linked to the Alchemists, the Cathars, and
the Knights Templar? A. Yes. They were all Gnostic, and the
Illuminati stood behind all of them.
Q. , Cathars ?
A. . .
Q. Did the Illuminati believe in the abolition of religion? A. No.
Only in the abolition of Satanic religions that enslaved and damned
people (such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam.) It is true that
many members of the Illuminati went under the guise of orthodox
Christians to avoid the penalties associated with heresy.
Q. ?
A. . (, , )
.
.
Q. Did the Illuminati believe in the abolition of government? A.
No. Only in the abolition of oppressive governments such as those
of monarchs, aristocrats, and privileged elites. They opposed
Communism for the same reason.
Q. ?
A. . , , .
.
Q. Did the Illuminati believe that they should rule the world? A.
No. They wished to create a New World Order in which everyone would
have the chance to go as far in life as their talents warranted. At
that stage, there would be no further need of the Illuminati. The
purpose of the Illuminati was to free and educate people as far as
possible. A society composed entirely of free, well-educated and
talented individuals would result in an emergent society from which
a new, higher type of humanity would emerge. Throughout history,
most people have been neither free nor educated, and the human race
has remained enslaved.
Q. ??
A. .
. .
.
, ,
. ,
.
Q. Are the Illuminati linked to a Masonic elite in the present day?
A. No. The Illuminati have repudiated Freemasonry and now rank it
alongside the Satanic religions. Most Freemasons are Protestant
Christians: anathema to the Illuminati. (The Illuminati are enemies
of all forms of Satanic Christianity. Catholicism was their great
enemy historically, but Protestantism now spawns the greatest
opposition to the Illuminati.)
Q. ?
A. .
. .(
(, ) .
, . )
Q. Do the Illuminati believe in a free, just, noble and unified
world? A. Yes, that is their ultimate vision, though they believe
it would take many steps to get there. They believe that
nationalism, patriotism, separation, isolationism, different
languages, different cultures, different religions, all inevitably
lead to division, suspicion, fear and, finally, conflict. Humanity
should emphasise what unites it rather than what divides it. A New
World Order with a single world language and a single economy where
there are no boundaries and no barriers best symbolizes this new
state of being. Star Trek provides a vision of such a future world.
Star Trek envisages a one- world meritocracy where greed, money,
nationalism, celebrity, monarchy have all been eliminated.
Q. , , , ?
A. , ,
.
, , , , , ,
, .
. ,
. (Star Trek) , , , ,
,
.
Q. Did WA say, "Let this circumstance of our constitution therefore
be directed to this noble purpose, and then all the objections
urged against it by jealous tyranny and affrighted superstition
will vanish." A. Yes. Q. Did WA say, "And of all illumination which
human reason can give, none is comparable to the discovery of what
we are, our nature, our obligations, what happiness we are capable
of, and what are the means of attaining it." A. Yes.
Q. Do the Illuminati believe in the abolition of private property?
A. No. But they are opposed to excessive ownership of private
property. They believe in a fair share for everyone. When one
person gains more than his fair share, he is depriving another of
his. You end up with a few families owning much of the land and
wealth of a nation, thus placing massive power in their hands and
outside the hands of the people. This cannot be tolerated. It is
the basis of unfairness, inequality and injustice in society.
Q. ?
A. . .
.
.
,
. .
, , () .
Q. Do the Illuminati believe in the abolition of the family? A. No.
But they do advocate much higher government involvement in the
lives of failing families in order to save those families from
themselves and stop them becoming a burden to other members of the
community. All families are ultimately interdependent: a failing
family affects all the families around it. Therefore government
must intervene decisively to stop one bad apple spoiling the
barrel, which is what happens too often in contemporary society. A
huge underclass of failed families exists which sucks up taxpayers'
money and requires an extremely costly police force to keep it in
order, an extremely costly criminal justice system, an extremely
costly prison system, and an extremely costly welfare and social
care system. These are huge costs that are never recovered. Failed
families are a constant drain on the rest of society. Therefore,
government must act before the failure of a family becomes cast in
stone and irretrievable. No family has the right, in the name of
personal freedom, to become a burden to other families.
Q. ?
A. . (failing families)
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
Q. Did WA believe that the world would be improved if "every man
were placed in the office for which he was fitted by nature and a
proper education." A. Yes. This is a good definition of
meritocracy3).
Q. WA "
“ ?
A. . (meritocracy)3) .
3) M. , (merit)
. IQ .
) .
http://www.meritocracy.org.uk
Q. Do the Illuminati believe in democracy? A. No. They believe in
meritocracy where the vote is granted to those who have
demonstrated that they can think meaningfully and productively
about the issues of the day. No one should get an automatic right
to a vote simply by living long enough to reach their 16th, 18th or
21st birthday.
Q. ?
A. .
.
16 , 18 21
.
Q. Is the Illuminati fascist? A. No. Meritocracy is opposed to
fascism. Fascism is obsessed with racial purity, nationalism,
patriotism and xenophobia. Meritocracy is opposed to all of these.
Ironically, many of the people who denounce the Illuminati as
fascists could themselves be accurately described as fascists. The
nationalist American "patriots" who despise their government, who
rail against the Illuminati, who hate foreigners, who have never
ventured out of their country, would all be classified by the
Illuminati as dangerous
fascists. Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber, is a classic
example of an American patriotic fascist. The racist, slave-loving,
Masonic Confederate States of America currently furnish most of the
enemies of the Illuminati.
Q. ?
A. . . , ,
. .
.
- , ,
, -
. Timothy
McVeigh . , ,
.
Q. Was Albert Pike5) a member of the Illuminati? A. No. Pike was a
racist, pro-slavery Confederate officer who loathed poor Irish
immigrants arriving in America. He was a leading thinker in the
type of Freemasonry that had become anathema to the Illuminati.
Pike's version of Freemasonry has been appropriated by the Old
World Order since it is compatible with their aims and agenda. The
supposed connection of Pike to the Illuminati is absurd. He
represented everything that people like Adam Weishaupt fought
against. Why would a society that wanted to overthrow tyranny
support racism and slavery? It is unthinkable, and all the
conspiracy theories that link Pike to the Illuminati are
idiotic.
Q. Albert Pike5) ?
A. . ,
.
.
.
.
Adam Weishaupt .
?
. ,
.
5) Albert Pike( )
1809 12 29 , 1891 4 2 .
33 .
“Moral and Dogma"
.
.
. ( )
1987 8 15 ,
1,2 3 . 1, 2 100% .
3
“The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the
differences caused by the "agentur"
of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders
of Islamic World. The war must be
conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and
political Zionism (the State of Israel)
mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more
divided on this issue will be
constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral,
spiritual and economical exhaustion…We
shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke
a formidable social cataclysm which in
all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of
absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the
most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to
defend themselves against the world
minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of
civilization, and the multitude,
disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from
that moment be without compass or
direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to
render its adoration, will receive the true
light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of
Lucifer, brought finally out in the public
view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary
movement which will follow the
destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and
exterminated at the same time."
“ 3
(agency,"agentur" ) .
.
, , .
, -----”
Q. Was Giusseppe Mazzini6) a member of the Illuminati? A. No. He
wished to join the Illuminati, and was originally viewed
favourably. He went through several stages of initiation before
being deemed unsuitable. He set up a false version of the
Illuminati that soon disappeared. His false Illuminati is at the
root of many of the sinister rumours that surround the Illuminati.
However, it must be acknowledged that not all of his activities
were deemed hostile to the interests of the Illuminati.
Q. 6) ?
A. . ,
.
.
.
. , .
.
6) ,
.
. 1829
, 1831
.
1829 1830
.
.
1834 .
. 1849 .
, 1872
. 10 . 1947 ,
75 .
Q. Did the Illuminati ever cease to exist? A. No. The Illuminati
has been in continuous existence since its inception. There have
been no breaks, though it has sometimes operated under alternative
names to prevent detection by its enemies. It has never been
suppressed, and has never disbanded.
Q. ?
A. . .
. .
Q. Is the Illuminati's political vision based on Plato's Republic?
A. No. It is based on ancient and hidden Gnostic teachings.
Q. ?
A. . . .
Q. Are the Illuminati opposed to liberty? A. No. They are champions
of liberty. They want people to be as free as possible within a
just, fair meritocracy. They oppose "freedom" where it allows
disproportionate appropriation of resources (by the super rich, for
example), thus starving others of resources and making others less
free than they would otherwise be.
Q. ?
A. . . , ,
. .
() . (
, ).
.
Q. Are the Illuminati linked to American "neocons7)"? A. No. The
neocons wish to impose the bondage of the Satanic Old World Order
upon the whole of humanity. How could a revolutionary movement such
as the Illuminati that
has always sought to overthrow the forces of privilege ever be
associated with "conservative" thinking? It is a crucial point that
the Old World Order simply wish to extend their current political
model all across the globe (best summarised as American
"democratic" market capitalism). In no sense do they wish to create
a New World Order. They aim to give the world more of the same;
nothing new. The New World Order of the Illuminati means an
entirely new economic, religious and political model for humanity,
with meritocracy at its core. The Old World Order would have no
place in the Illuminati's New World Order. All of their wealth and
power would be stripped from them. That, of course, is why they
fear the Illuminati so much and why they spend so much time engaged
in propaganda against the Illuminati.
Q. neocons( 7)) ?
A. . .
?
.( “”
.) .
. .
,
, .
. .
.
7) .
(neo-conservatives) .
.
. 1960~1970 , ·
· .
" "
(Leo Strauss) . 1980 (Ronald Wilson Reagan)
, (Bill Clinton) ,
(George Walker Bush) .
,
.
(Dick Cheney) , (Donald Rumsfeld) , (Paul
Wolfowitz) , (Louis Libby) . · ,
, .
Q. Did the Illuminati have a strong involvement in the Scottish War
of Independence against England, the English Civil War, the
American Revolution, the French Revolution, the American Civil War,
the Irish Easter Uprising8), the Russian Revolution, the Cuban
Revolution, and many other risings and revolutions? A. Yes. There
is Illuminati involvement in most revolutions, rebellions and
uprisings. It is usually advantageous to the Illuminati to
destabilise the power of the Old World Order in any part of the
world at any time. However, the Illuminati will not support causes
with which they have no sympathy, even if they might provide
tactical gains.
Q. , , , ,
, 8), ,
?
A. . , , .
.
3,000
.
Q. Do the many conspiracy theories involving the Illuminati have
any basis in truth? A. Most conspiracy theories are absurd - a
hotchpotch of paranoid rants and crazy links between things that
have no connection whatsoever. How can a secret society such as the
Illuminati that has always opposed monarchy, excessive wealth and
privilege be placed alongside the super rich, royalty and dynastic
families in the pantheon of conspiracy theories? It is ludicrous
and merely reflects the stupidity of the people who hold these
nonsensical views. To say that the Illuminati, a society that has
had to flee the persecution of the Old World Order, are the
puppetmasters behind the scenes is too ridiculous for words. Any
conspiracy theorist who is unable to distinguish between the Old
World Order and the New World Order hasn't even begun to understand
the true nature of the world. Conspiracy theorists tend to assemble
a list of everything they fear and hate then put them all together
into one huge conspiracy, no matter that the pieces simply don't
fit together. Any conclusions that flow from such an idiotic
collection of incompatible ingredients are invariably laughable.
The Old World Order is extremely right wing. The Illuminati would
be considered on the left (though, in fact, they reject many
liberal, left wing nostrums). Saint-Just, Robespierre and Marat,
all members of the Jacobin Club9) in revolutionary France, were
senior members of the Illuminati. The only reason such people would
visit Bohemian Grove10) would be to burn it down. It is always
wrong to shoehorn right wing and left wing groups together.
Q. , ?
A. . -
.
,
, ?
.
,
.
.
.
.
. . (though,
in fact, they reject many liberal, left wing nostrums).
Saint-Just,
Robespierre and Marat, 9) .
10) .
.
9) 1789 1793 6 1794 7
. , 1794 7 27
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_PAqT2JZOw
Q. Are the Illuminati wealthy? A. The Illuminati have many
priceless artefacts in their possession. However, they would never
sell any of these items since they reflect the history and the
great religious secrets of the Illuminati. So, their wealth is
simultaneously vast but in no way realisable.
Q. ?
A. .
.
.
Q. What are the secrets of the Illuminati? A. The Illuminati have
been open about their political agenda, but they will not comment
expansively upon religious and spiritual matters until the moment
is right. Q. ?
A. . ,
.
Q. Are the Illuminati party to an astonishing religious mystery, a
great secret? A. Yes.
Q. ?, ?
A. .
Q. Will the Illuminati's forthcoming book "The Soul Camera" reveal
any of their secrets? A. This book will be a mixture of fact,
fiction and disguised facts. The well-informed will gain many
insights. For others, it will simply be a story.
Q. "The Soul Camera" ?
A. , , .
, .
: The Soul Camera 2012 12 21 .
It is the name of truth, justice and freedom that the Illuminati
will one day deliver the just, equitable and meritocratic New World
Order humanity is crying out for. "It is in truth not for glory,
nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for
that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life
itself."
, ,
.
", , .
. - .
The Declaration of Arbroath, Scotland, 1320 1320 Arbroath
Quotations by Adam Weishaupt Adam Weishaupt . When man lives under
oppressive government, he is fallen, his worth is gone, and his
nature tarnished. , ,
.
This is the great object held out by this association; and the
means of attaining it is illumination, enlightening the
understanding by the sun of reason which will dispel the clouds of
superstition and of prejudice. .:
. ( . )
And of all illumination which human reason can give, none is
comparable to the discovery of what we are, our nature, our
obligations, what happiness we are capable of, and what are the
means of attaining it. ( )
Nothing would be more profitable to us than a right history of
mankind. .
But I would have executed much greater things, had not government
always opposed my exertions, and placed others in situations which
would have suited my talents. But alas, they are all sadly
deficient, because they leave us under the domination of political
and religious prejudices; and they are as inefficient as the sleepy
dose of an ordinary sermon. ( ) Morality will perform all this; and
Morality is the fruit of Illumination.
My general plan is good, though in the detail there may be faults.
, .
Of all the means I know to lead men, the most effectual is a
concealed mystery. ,
.