Upload
shannon-oliver
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Accurate analytic potentials for HeH +, HeD +, HeT +, including finite-mass, relativistic and 4 th order QED Staszek Welsh, Mariusz Puchalski, Grzegorz Lach, Wei-Cheng Tung, Ludwik Adamowicz, Nike Dattani Oxford University 2014 年 6 月 20 日 Adam Mickiewicz University
Citation preview
Accurate analytic potentials for HeH+, HeD+, HeT+,
including finite-mass, relativistic and 4th order QED
Staszek Welsh, Mariusz Puchalski, Grzegorz Lach, Wei-Cheng Tung, Ludwik Adamowicz,
Nike Dattani
2014 年 6 月 20 日
Accurate analytic potentials for HeH+, HeD+, HeT+,
including finite-mass, relativistic and 4th order QED
Staszek Welsh, Mariusz Puchalski, Grzegorz Lach, Wei-Cheng Tung, Ludwik Adamowicz,
Nike Dattani
Oxford
University
2014 年 6 月 20 日
Accurate analytic potentials for HeH+, HeD+, HeT+,
including finite-mass, relativistic and 4th order QED
Staszek Welsh, Mariusz Puchalski, Grzegorz Lach, Wei-Cheng Tung, Ludwik Adamowicz,
Nike Dattani
Oxford
University
2014 年 6 月 20 日
Adam Mickiewicz University
Accurate analytic potentials for HeH+, HeD+, HeT+,
including finite-mass, relativistic and 4th order QED
Staszek Welsh, Mariusz Puchalski, Grzegorz Lach, Wei-Cheng Tung, Ludwik Adamowicz,
Nike Dattani
Oxford
University
2014 年 6 月 20 日
Adam Mickiewicz University
University of Arizona
Accurate analytic potentials for HeH+, HeD+, HeT+,
including finite-mass, relativistic and 4th order QED
Staszek Welsh, Mariusz Puchalski, Grzegorz Lach, Wei-Cheng Tung, Ludwik Adamowicz,
Nike Dattani
Oxford
University
2014 年 6 月 20 日
Adam Mickiewicz UniversityIIMCB
University of Arizona
Accurate analytic potentials for HeH+, HeD+, HeT+,
including finite-mass, relativistic and 4th order QED
Staszek Welsh, Mariusz Puchalski, Grzegorz Lach, Wei-Cheng Tung, Ludwik Adamowicz,
Nike Dattani
Oxford
University京都大学( Kyoto University)
2014 年 6 月 20 日
Adam Mickiewicz UniversityIIMCB
University of Arizona
Please guess !
At what number of electrons, do you think agreement between experiment and theory collapses?
1e- : HHyperfine structure142040575768(1) mHz (present best experiment)1420452 (theory – QED)
What’s missing is the effect of the nuclear structure
1e- : Mu (p+ in H is replaced by μ+) Hyperfine structure4463302780(50) Hz (experiment)4463302880(550) Hz (theory – QED)
2e- : HeHyperfine structure6739701177(16) Hz (experiment)6739699930(1700) Hz (theory, QED + nuclear structure)
Agreement possible because Hz precision, not mHz
2e- : H21975: Kolos & Wolniewicz (numerical soln to Schroedinger Eqn)
More recently:
Ev = 1 – Ev = 0 4161.16632(18) cm-1 ( experiment )4161.16612(9) ( best theory )
3e- : Li
2S
2P
3e- : Li
Experiment: 14903.632061014 +/- 0.0000005003 cm-1
Theory: 14903.631765 +/- 0.000667 cm-1
Experiment:
Theory:
3e- : Li
Energy (for lowest transition)
Radiative lifetime ?V(r) = - C3 / r3 – C6 / r6 – C8 / r8 …
Radiative lifetime : τ = ( 3ħ / 2C3 ) ( λ / 2 π )3
Oldest experimental value ? Guess !
1931 Loomis F.W. and Nusbaum R.E. Phys. Rev. 38 pg. 1447
1931 Loomis F.W. and Nusbaum R.E. Phys. Rev. 38 pg. 1447
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign physics department:“Loomis Laboratory of Physics”
Loomis was challenged in bringing top-notch physics talent to a university in the rural Midwest. When he approached Isaac Rabi, Rabi said "I love subways and I hate cows."
While building the department, Loomis attracted John Bardeen (2 Nobel prizes) to join the staff, and had Polykarp Kusch (1 Nobel Prize) as his graduate student.
Year Name Nobel Prize
1923 Du Vigneaud Nobel Prize in Chemistry
1929 Stanley Nobel Prize in Chemistry
1933 Kusch Nobel Prize in Physics
1947 Kilby Nobel Prize in Physics
1957 Schrieffer Nobel Prize in Physics
1969 Sharp Nobel Prize in Chemistry
???? Ben McCall
1931 Loomis F.W. and Nusbaum R.E. Phys. Rev. 38 pg. 1447
More recently: (Le Roy & Dattani)2009: C3 = 357829(8) “most accurate C3 value for any molecule ever determined,by an order of magnitude” “landmark in diatomic spectral analysis” (2011 Mitroy et al.)Theory:2009: C3 = 357810.89(7) (finite-mass corrections)2010: C3 = 357773 (relativistic corrections)2011: C3 = 357773 (third order perturbation theory)
Experiment:2011: C3 = 357557(78)2013: C3 = 357682.8(44)2013: C3 = 357835.2
1e- : Mu : H2e- : He : H2
3e- : Li2e- : HeH+
Li2
V(r) = - C3 / r3 – C6 / r6 – C8 / r8 …
Radiative lifetime of Li (2p) : τ = ( 3ħ / 2C3 ) ( λ / 2 π )3
HeH+
V(r) = - C4 / r3 – C6 / r6 – C7 / r7 …
Dipole polarizability of He : α = 2C4
Change in SI definitions
New definition of kB , more rigorous temperature scale
Current SI units: SI units will soon change:25th General Conference on Weights and Measures (18-20 November 2014)
Redefining temperature
New definition of kB , more rigorous temperature scale
Dipole polarizability () for He atom 1.383759(13) (experiment)1.38376079(23) (theory)
𝑘 𝐵=α 𝑁 𝐴23𝑝 ε 0
(Є 𝑟+2)(Є 𝑟 −1)
pressure(held fixed) vaccuum
permitivity(defined)
refractive index(measured accurately)
Avagadro constant (known accurately)
Li2
V(r) = - C3 / r3 – C6 / r6 – C8 / r8 …
Radiative lifetime of Li (2p) : τ = ( 3ħ / 2C3 ) ( λ / 2 π )3
HeH+
V(r) = - C4 / r3 – C6 / r6 – C7 / r7 …
Dipole polarizability of He : α = 2C4
Part II
Best ab initio for Li2 (6e-)
Recent experiments needed +/- 0.01 cm-1 predictions
Experiment would take several years, need better than ab initio
Alternative to ab initio : Empirical potential (MLR)
Using very little data, All energies can be predicted
very accurately
Experiment successful BECAUSE,MLR’s predicted energies were much better than ab initio
MLR (Morse / Long-Range) Potential
It’s a Morse potential,but with the correct long-range built in !!!
MLR (Morse / Long-Range) Potential
It’s a Morse potential,but we can make the long-range part correct !!!
for large r, we should have for HeH+:
V(r) = De – C4 / r4 – C6 / r6 – C7 / r7 – C8 / r8 …
So
u(r) = C4 / r4 + C6 / r6 + C7 / r7 + C8 / r8 …
V(r) = De – C4 / r4 – C6 / r6 – C7 / r7 – C8 / r8 …
C4 : dipole polarizability C6 : quadrupole polarizability, non-adiabatic dipole polarizabilityC7 : mixed dipole-dipole-quadrupole polarizability (3rd order)C8 : hyperpolarizability (4th order), octupole polarizability,
& non-adiabatic quadrupole polarizability
for large r, we should have:
V(r) = De – C4 / r4 – C6 / r6 – C7 / r7 – C8 / r8 …
C4 : dipole polarizabilitynon-relativistic 1.383192174455(1) 13 digits !relativistic corrections -80.35(2)QED 3rd order modulo Bethe lnQED 3rd order with Bethe lnQED 4th order, finite-mass 3rd order
30.473(1) 0.193(2) 0.49(23)
total dipole polarizability 1383760.79(23)
for large r, we should have:
V(r) = De – C4 / r4 – C6 / r6 – C7 / r7 – C8 / r8 …
C6 : quadrupole polarizability
non-relativistic 2.44508310433(5) 12 digits !!!relativistic corrections -1.750786(2) x 10-4
finite-mass corrections 1.8749483(3) x 10-3
total quadrupole polarizability
2.4467829742(4)
1e- : Mu : H2e- : He : H2
3e- : Li2e- : HeH+
In Progress
1e- : Mu : H2e- : He : H2
3e- : Li5e- : BeH
5e- : BeH
Most accurate empirical potential:
2006 Le Roy et al. JMS 236, 178-188
C6, C8, C10 not included couldn’t determine leading BOB term (u0 ) De had uncertainty of +/- 200cm-1
single-state fit (excited states not included)
V(r) = - C6 / r3 – C8 / r6 – C10 / r8 …
5e- : BeH C6, C8, C10 not included couldn’t determine leading BOB term (u0 ) De had uncertainty of +/- 200cm-1
single-state fit (excited states not included)
Next step!
1e- : Mu 2e- : He : H2
3e- : Li5e- : BeH5e- : LiHe
in progress
Thank you VERY MUCH !!!