21

A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 2: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 3: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 4: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 5: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 6: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 7: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 8: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 9: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 10: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 11: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 12: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 13: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 14: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 15: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 16: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 17: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration

Estimates and Stats

Many missing sensor offset sensor offset 2 Double Rotation incorrect Planar Fit WPL_None% % % % % %

-22.34 -0.61 -3.44 0.81 -5.17 -7.73

As per data from a microclimate station in the everglades, wet prarie Hensen MarshIn 2009, the site had 36.61 inches of rainfall and ET was 41 inches, ~ ET/Precip is 112%

If this was understimated by 22.34%, the water budget would be inaccurate by over 7 inches.

For a small watershed, surface water runoff can be 15%, an error of this scale can create gross inaccurate water budgets.

Can lead to extended drought, poor infrastructure deployments, or not enough water for industrial operations.

Page 18: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 19: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 20: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration
Page 21: A sensitivity Analysis of Eddy Covariance Data Processing Methods for Evapotranspiration