Upload
others
View
10
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A FINITE ELDIENT ANALYSISOF NON-MONOTONE ELLIPTIC BOUNDARY-VALUE PROBLEMS
J. T. OdenThe University of Texas at Austin
U. S. - Japan Seminar onInterdisciplinary Finite Element Analysis
Cornell [niversity
August 1978
,--l --)
A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSISOF NON-~lONOTONE ELLIPTIC BOUNDARY-VALUE PROBLEMS
J. T. Oden
Texas Institute for Computational MechanicsThe University of Texas at Austin
1. Introduction
In this note, I will summarize some joint work with C.T. Reddy
and N. Kikuchi on finite element approximations of certain nonlinear
boundary-value problems which involve non-monotone nonlinear elliptic
operators. Such problems may have multiple solutions, and the study of
convergence and the estimation of errors requires some new methods.
'Complete details of the results I list here, including proofs of all of
the theorems, are given elsewhere (3,4].
As a model problem of the type described above, consider the non-
linear Dirichlet problem
A(u)
u
where, formally,
f
oin non an } (1.1)
A(u) -'V° (\'Vulp-2u) + a ~ __-v'i+ l'VuJ2
l'VulP= ('VuoVu)p/2 , 2 ~ p < 00
a = const. > 0
} (1. 2)
Cases for which a < 0 and 1 < p < 2 are discussed in [4); a related case
of parabolic problems is studied in [1]. In (1.1), n is a smooth bounded
'nopen domain in:R with a Lipschitz boundary an The "weak"
2
or variational form of (1.1) is:
(A(u),v> = '(f,v)
Find u E w1,p(n) such thato
(1. 3)
where Wl,p(n) is the usual Sobolev space of order (l,p) witho
v € w~' p (n) => v I an == O. For 2 2. p < 00, this space is reflexive when
equipped with the norm,
(1.4)
;rn (1.3), (-,-j
p' = p/ (p-l) ,
WI, p (m. Thus,o
denotes duality pairing on
with W-l,p'(n) = (Wl,p(n»'o denoting the dual of
<A(u) ,v>
(1.5)
We wish to study finite-element-Galerkin approximations of (1.5) con-
structed using piecewise linear CO-finite elements and regular mesh
refinements satisfying the usual angIe conditions (see, e.g. Ciarlet [2)
or [5]). Thus, we approximate wl,p (n) by a family of finite-dimensionalo
subs paces {Uh} , everywhere dense inO<h<1
Wl,p(n), whereo
3
(1. 6)
where G is a finite elem~nt in a partition ~ of Q and P1(G) is the
space of polynomials of degree < 1 on G. These spaces possess the following
interpolation property as h ~ 0. For uEW~,p(mnWl,p(m, there existso
a constant
such that
K > 0, independent of u and h , and an element
µ = min(l,R.-l)
(1. 7)
The finite element approximation of (1.5) consists of seeking
Uh E ~ such that
(1.8)
2. Existence and Convergence of Ga1erkin Approximations
It can be shown [4] that the operator A:w1,P(n) ~ w-1,p' (n) definedo
in (1.2) satisfies the following conditions:
(i) For P > 3n/(n+2) (n = dimW», and VU,v,w E W1,p(n)- 0
!(A(u) - A(v),w)! ~ g(u,v) Ilu-vlll,pllwl11,p
4
(2.1)
g(u,v) 8(llu111, +llvlll )p-2 + Cla(1 +Ilvlll ),p ,p ,p
..(p+l for 2~p~3
8 = 1 ; Cl = const > 0
p - I for p .: 3
(ii) <A(v) , v> -+ + 00 as Ilvll ~ 00
Ilv Ill, pl,p
(2.2)
(2.3)
(iii)
we have
v u,v t B (0) t whereµ
B (0) = {w t WI, P (n)µ 0
Ilwlll <µ},p(2.4)
2<A(u) - A(v),u-v) > p Ilu-vllP1 - Y(µ)llu-vIIPo'z ,-allu-vll (2.5)
- 0 ,p , P 0,2
in which
p = Zp-lo - E y(µ) 1p' (Ep)l/(p-l)
(acµ)p' (2.6)
p-lE is a positive constant < 2 ,C is an absolute constant depending
only on n ,n, and p, and p' = p/(p-1).
The following existence and convergence theorem governs (1.3) and its
approximation (1.8):
Theorem 1. Let conditions (i), (ii), and (iii) given above hold
5
(particularly (2.1), (2.3), and (2.5». Then
1. There exists at least one solution1 'for any data f E}-l- ,p (m
u E wI, P (n) to (1.3)o
In addition, let (1. 7) hold as h -+ 0 V U h' where U h is defined in (1. 6) .
Then
2. There exists at least one solution uhEUhCW1,PW) to (1.8)1 ' 0
for any data fEW- ,p (m.Finally, if {~} is a sequence of approximations satisfying (1.8) V h,
as h -+ 0 , there exists a subsequence {uhf} which converges strongly
to a solution u of (1.3); i.e.
limh'-+O
II U - uh' 111, P o 0
3. Local Analysis and Error Estimates
Let u be a solution of (1.3) and uh a solution of (1.8) and
suppose conditions (2.1)-(2.6) hold. Notice also the orthogonality
condition
which is obtained by setting v = vh in (1.3) and subtracting (l.8). Then,
from (2.5), (3.1), and (2.1), we have, for any vhfUh,
p p' 2pollu-~II - y(µ) Ilu-~II - al lu-vl I ~ (A(u)
l,p O,q 0,2
6
= (A(u) - A(uh) , u-vh>
~ g(u,uh)! \u-uhlIl,pl Iu-vh I Il,p
Here q 2p' or, if v f Wl, p (n) is boundedo in Lr(n) for some r > 1,
then q = rp/(rp-r-p). Thus,
p'
< g(u,~)llu-~11 +y(µ)llu-uhlll,p O,q
2+ allu-~ II 2
0,
(3.2)
The difference u-~ in (3.2), however, may not represent the error
in the finite element approximation of u: since neither (1.3) nor (1.8)
necessarily have unique solutions, there is no reason to expect that uh
is an approximation of the particular solution u. To proceed further, we
need to examine the local behavior of solutions.
Consider the mean-value formula for Gateaux derivatives:
(A(u) - A(v),w) = (DA(au+(l-a)v) (u-v),w>
(DA(u).v,w,> = lim t- <A(u+tv),w) ,V WtWl,p(Q)t~O+ t 0
aE[O,l]
and consider the auxiliary linear boundary-value problem;
(3.3)
<DA(w):~,n) = <~,~) V ~ f wl'Z(n)o
for ~ € Lq~(n), q~ 2 2. Suppose that numbers M(w), mew), A(W)
exist for each w (wl,p(n) such thato
(3.4)
(3.5)
7
Since I I~I10 2 2 C I I~I/1 2 ,where C is the constant of Poincare's, p, P
inequality, the right side of (3.5)2 is positive whenever
m(w) - C2 A(W) > 0p (1.6)
(3.7)
When (3.5) holds, (3.4) is solvable for 11, but the solutions are
not necessarily unique. When (3.5) also holds, a unique solution n in
Wl,2(n) n W2,2(n) to (2.4) exists ando
IInllz,2 ~ C(u) 11~llo,2
Continuing,
(i) Let 0.3), (3.4), and (3.5) hold
(ii) Let {~} be a sequence of finite element approximations,
satisfying (l.B), which converge strongly to a solution
u of (1.3) (the existence of such a sequence is guaranteed. 1 p 1 00
by Theorem 1), and u (Wo ' (n) nW ' (n);
(iii) For some £ > 0, let (3.6) hold for all
wEB (u) = {wE.wl,p(n): Ilu-wlll < d.£ 0 ,p
.~
Under these conditions, there exists an h and a e€ [O,l] such that£
8
for h < h£
the approximation error eh
= u-~ satisfies
sup'II
(1J>,eh>.II t/! 110, p
< sup
1J>
(DA(8u+(1-e)uh eh,n>
11'11110,2
(A(U)-A(uh),n-~n>sup
1J> 11t/!llo,2
Thus, if (1.7), (2.1), and (3.7) holda:nd q"'~p~2, then as h ~ 0,
I lehl 10 ~ g(u,uh)! lehl 11 K h,q ,p (3.8)
We can now complete the determination of (non-optimal) a-priori error
estimates.
Theorem 2. Let (1.7), (2.1), (3.7), and conditions (i), (ii)
200 1pand (iii) above hold. Let uEw' (mnH ' en) he a solution of (1.3).o
Then, as h ~ 0, the error eh
= u-~ in the finite element approxi-
rnation of u satisfies
I lehl I < G(u)h1/(p-l) + H(u)h1/(p-2)
l,p(3.9)
where G(u) and H(u) are positive constants depending on the solution u
but not on h. 0
The estimate (3.9) follows easily from (3.3), (3.8), and the fact that
since strongly, are bounded in wl,p(n).o
It is also possible to obtain reasonably sharp estimates of G(u) and
H(u) [3; 4].
9
Acknowledgement," The results communicated here were developed in the
course of research supported by the U. S. National Science Foundation
under Grant NSF-ENG-75-07846 and the Army Research Office - Durham, under
Grant DAAG 29-77-G-0087,
References
1. A1duncin, G. and Oden, J.T., "Qualitative Analysis and Ga1erkinApproximation of a Class of Nonlinear Convection-Diffusion Problems;Part I - Qualitative Analysis; Part II - A Model Problem," TICOMReport 78-7, Austin, 1978.
2. Ciar1et, P.G., The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems,North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978,
3. Oden, J.T. and Reddy, C.T., "Finite Element Approximations of a Classof Highly Nonlinear Boundary-Value Problems in Finite Elasticity,Part I - Preliminaries and Qualitative Analysis; Part II - Approxi-mation Theory," J. Num. Functional Anal. Appl., Vol. 1, No.1, 1978.
4, Oden, J.T., Reddy, C.T., and Kikuchi, N., "Qualitative Analysis andFinite Element Approximation of a Class of Nonmonotone NonlinearDirichlet Problems," TICOM Report 78-8, Austin, 1978.
5. Oden, J.T. and Reddy, J.N., An Introduction to the Mathematical Theoryof Finite Elements, Wi1ey-Interscience, New York, 1976.