Upload
andrea-malone
View
216
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cortes-Franco, J., Coutre, S., Di Bona, E., Lo-Coco, F., Wetzler, M.,
Sanz, M., Wieland, S., Barber, J.R. & Kantarjian, H.M. (2009) A
phase II study of oral tamibarotene in acute promyelocytic leukemia
(APL) patients (PTS) who have received prior therapy with all-trans
retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide (STAR-1 trial). Blood (ASH Annual
Meeting Abstracts), 114, 2050.
Ohnishi, K. (2007) PML-RARa inhibitors (ATRA, tamibaroten, arsenic
troxide) for acute promyelocytic leukemia. International Journal of
Clinical Oncology, 12, 313–317.
Sanz, M.A., Lo-Coco, F., Martın, G., Avvisati, G., Rayon, C., Barbui, T.,
Dıaz-Mediavilla, J., Fioritoni, G., Gonzalez, J.D., Liso, V., Esteve, J.,
Ferrara, F., Bolufer, P., Bernasconi, C., Gonzalez, M., Rodeghiero, F.,
Colomer, D., Petti, M.C., Ribera, J.M. & Mandelli, F. (2000) Defi-
nition of relapse risk and role of nonanthracycline drugs for con-
solidation in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia: a joint
study of the PETHEMA and GIMEMA cooperative groups. Blood,
96, 1247–1253.
Sanz, M.A., Grimwade, D., Tallman, M.S., Lowenberg, B., Fenaux, P.,
Estey, E.H., Naoe, T., Lengfelder, E., Buchner, T., Dohner, H.,
Burnett, A.K. & Lo-Coco, F. (2009) Management of acute prom-
yelocytic leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on
behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood, 113, 1875–1891.
Tobita, T., Takeshita, A., Kitamura, K., Ohnishi, K., Yanagi, M., Hir-
aoka, A., Karasuno, T., Takeuchi, M., Miyawaki, S., Ueda, R., Naoe,
T. & Ohno, R. (1997) Treatment with a new synthetic retinoid,
Am80, of acute promyelocytic leukemia relapsed from complete
remission induced by all-trans retinoic acid. Blood, 90, 967–973.
Keywords: acute promyelocytic leukaemia, synthetic all-trans
retinoic acid, Tamibarotene, ATO, molecular remission.
First published online 5 July 2010
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08308.x
A Doctor(s) dilemma: ETV6-ABL1 positive acute lymphoblasticleukaemia
Leukaemic cells with the t(9;12)(q34;p13) produce a chimaeric
transcript resulting from the fusion of ETV6 at 12p13 with
ABL1 at 9q34. First described in 1995 (Papadopoulos et al,
1995) in a child with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic
leukaemia (ALL), ETV6-ABL1 positive leukaemias (acute and
chronic) are rare, with fully reported karyotypes in only nine
cases in the literature (Brunel et al, 1996; Golub et al, 1996;
Andreasson et al, 1997; Van Limbergen et al, 2001; La Starza
et al, 2002; Lin et al, 2002). Alternative splicing of ETV6 exons
is a common feature of these leukaemias (Bohlander, 2005).
Analogous to BCR-ABL1, the ETV6-ABL1 fusion protein has
elevated tyrosine kinase activity and therefore tyrosine kinase
inhibition with Imatinib might prove highly effective in the
treatment of ETV6-ABL1 positive ALL, as has been demon-
strated in ETV6-ABL1 positive chronic myeloid leukaemia
(Kawamata et al, 2008).
An 8-year old girl was hospitalized with a short history of
fever and back pain in association with lymphadenopathy and
hepatosplenomegaly. Her white cell count (WCC) was
282 · 109/l, Hb 118 g/l and platelet count was 40 · 109/l;
immunophenotyping of peripheral blood blasts confirmed
B-cell precursor ALL. On the basis of her presenting WCC
(>50 · 109/l) she was initially risk stratified as intermediate
risk and commenced a four drug (Dexamethasone, Vincristine,
Daunorubicin and Asparaginase) induction chemotherapy
according to the prospective multicentre trial UK ALL 2003.
Bone marrow cytomorphological analysis 8 d into treatment
showed 90% lymphoblasts. In the interim, fluorescence in situ
hybridization analysis showed a t(9;12)(q34;p13)/ETV6-ABL1
fusion and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
(RT-PCR) revealed expression of both ETV6 exon 4-ABL1 and
ETV6 exon 5-ABL1 transcripts (La Starza et al, 2002). She was
switched to the more intensive Schedule C, UK ALL 2003 and
Imatinib at a dose of 300 mg/m2 daily was immediately added
to her induction block of chemotherapy. By day 15 her bone
marrow blast count was less than 5% and minimal residual
disease (MRD) status at day 29, as assessed by allele-specific
oligonucleotide-PCR (IgH) was low risk (MRD negative or
positive <5 · 10)5). Ten months following diagnosis she
remains on continuous Imatinib therapy and in molecular
remission.
There are a number of important issues regarding this
particular patient’s optimal treatment that warrant further
discussion. First, should haematopoietic stem cell transplanta-
tion (HSCT) with a human leucocyte antigen (HLA) identical
related or unrelated donor be the treatment of choice in first
complete molecular remission? While the ETV6-ABL1 fusion
probably confers a poor prognosis similar to BCR-ABL1,
opinion is still divided as to the role of HSCT as standard
therapy in children and young adolescents with Ph+ ALL.
Recent data from the Children’s Oncology Group demon-
strated that the addition of imatinib to chemotherapy in this
cohort of Ph+ ALL is tolerable and confers a significant survival
advantage, albeit in historical controls (Schultz et al, 2009). The
authors went on to suggest that intensive poly-chemotherapy
plus Imatinib is, in fact, superior in terms of event-free survival
compared to HLA-matched HSCT from a related or unrelated
donor (Schultz et al, 2009). In this case, a 4/6 matched
Correspondence
ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 151, 84–109 101
unrelated umbilical cord was the only stem cell source available
so the decision to treat with Imatinib and high risk ALL
intensive poly-chemotherapy was taken.
Second, what is the true prognostic significance of low risk
MRD at day 29 in the context of the initial slow early response
at day eight (>90% blasts) and the rapid clearance of blasts by
day 15 (<5% blasts) following the addition of 7 d of Imatinib
therapy? Also, would low risk MRD status have been achieved
without the addition of Imatinib? Clearly these questions are
extremely difficult to answer and maybe not that clinically
relevant, as MRD status at the end of induction therapy is
probably the single most important determinant of outcome in
childhood and adolescent ALL, no matter how this is achieved,
although it should be stated that the significance of low risk
MRD following induction with this particular cytogenetic
abnormality remains unknown.
The third issue surrounds the optimum duration of tyrosine
kinase inhibition and for how long should molecular moni-
toring for MRD proceed? As there is no data in relation to
ETV6-ABL1 ALL, our approach is to continue Imatinib for
2 years following cessation of poly-chemotherapy as is done
with ATRA in acute promyelocytic leukaemia and Imatinib in
adult Ph+ ALL protocols. During this period of ‘Imatinib
maintenance’ molecular monitoring for MRD (paired bone
marrow and blood samples using RT-PCR for both ETV6 exon
4-ABL1 and ETV6 exon 5-ABL1 transcripts) would be carried
out every 3 months to predict impending relapse with a view
to pre-emptive therapy with a second generation tyrosine
kinase inhibitor with re-induction chemotherapy and revisit
the possibility of HSCT should this arise.
This case adds to the very sparsely reported clinical cases of
ETV6-ABL1 leukaemia in the literature and highlights the
difficulties faced in optimally treating these patients. Whilst
tyrosine kinase inhibition will most likely improve the
outcome, the optimal duration of treatment awaits clarifica-
tion. In the pre-Imatinib era HSCT clearly offered a survival
benefit over intensive chemotherapy alone, however, the
current role of transplantation in these rare leukaemias
remains to be ascertained.
Andrea Malone1
Stephen Langabeer2
Aengus O’Marcaigh1,3
Lorna Storey1
Christopher L. Bacon1
Owen P. Smith1,3
1Department of Haematology & Oncology, Our Lady’s Children’s
Hospital, 2Cancer Molecular Diagnostics, St James’s Hospital, and3Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
E-mail: [email protected]
References
Andreasson, P., Johansson, B., Carlsson, M., Jarlsfelt, I., Fioretos, T. &
Mitelman, F. (1997) BCR/ABL negative chronic myeloid leukemia
with ETV6/ABL fusion. Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 20, 229–304.
Bohlander, S.K. (2005) ETV6: a versatile player in leukemogenesis.
Seminars in Cancer Biology, 15, 162–174.
Brunel, V., Sainty, D. & Carbuccia, N. (1996) A TEL/ABL fusion gene
on chromosome 12p13 in a case of Ph-, BCR- atypical CML.
Leukemia, 10, 2003.
Golub, T.R., Goga, A., Barker, G.F., Afar, D.E., McLaughlin, J. &
Bohlander, S.K. (1996) Oligomerisation of the ABL tyrosine kinase
by Ets protein TEL in human leukemia. Molecular Cell Biology, 16,
4107–4116.
Kawamata, N., Dashti, A., Lu, D., Miller, B., Koeffler, H.P. & Schreck,
R. (2008) Chronic phase of ETV6-ABL1 positive CML responds to
imatinib. Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 47, 919–921.
La Starza, R., Trubia, M., Testoni, N., Ottaviani, E., Belloni, E.,
Crescenzi, B., Martelli, M.F., Flandrin, G., Pelicci, P.G. &
Mecucci, C. (2002) Clonal eosinophils are a morphologic hall-
mark of ETV6/ABL1 acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica, 87,
789–794.
Lin, H., Guo, J.Q., Andreeff, M. & Arlinghaus, R.B. (2002) Detection of
dual TEL-ABL transcripts and a Tel-Abl protein containing
phosphotyrosine in a chronic myeloid leukemia patient. Leukemia,
16, 294–298.
Papadopoulos, P., Ridge, S.A., Boucher, C.A., Stocking, C. & Wiede-
mann, L.M. (1995) The Novel activation of ABL by fusion to an
ets-related gene, TEL. Cancer Research, 55, 34–38.
Schultz, K.R., Bowman, W.P., Aledo, A., Slayton, W.B., Sather, H.,
Devidas, M., Wang, C., Davies, S.M., Gaynon, P.S., Trigg, M.,
Rutledge, R., Burden, L., Jorstad, D., Carroll, A., Heerema, N.A.,
Winick, N., Borowitz, M.J., Hunger, S.P., Carroll, W.L. & Camitta,
B. (2009) Improved early event free survival with imatinib in Phil-
adelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a
children’s oncology study group. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27,
5175–5181.
Van Limbergen, H., Beverloo, H.B., van Drunen, E., Janssens, A.,
Hahlen, K. & Poppe, B. (2001) Molecular cytogenetic and clinical
findings in ETV6/ABL1- positive leukemia. Genes, Chromosomes and
Cancer, 30, 274–282.
Keywords: ETV6-ABL1, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia,
imatinib, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
First published online 6 July 2010
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08323.x
Correspondence
102 ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 151, 84–109