Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
A developmental switch of gene expression in the barley seed mediated 1 by HvVP1 (Viviparous-1) and HvGAMYB interactions 2
3
Zamira Abraham*, Raquel Iglesias-Fernández*, Manuel Martínez, Isabel Díaz, 4 Pilar Carbonero, Jesús Vicente-Carbajosa+ 5
*Equal authors 6
Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (UPM-INIA), and E.T.S.I. 7 Agrónomos, Campus de Montegancedo, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 8 Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28223-Madrid, Spain 9 10
Short Title: HvVP1 effects on HvGAMYB in seed development 11
12
Keywords: Barley Viviparous-1 (HvVP1), HvGAMYB, BPBF (HvDOF24), Hor2 13 gene, α-amylase gene, seed gene regulation, maturation, germination, 14 transcriptional activation, transcriptional repression 15
1 This work was financially supported by MINECO, Spain (Project BFU2013-16
49665-EXP; p.i. J. V-C) and by MICINN (Project BFU2009-11809; p.i. P.C). 17
+Address correspondence to [email protected] 18
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings 19 presented in this article in accordance with the policy, described in the 20 instructions for authors (http://www.plantphysiolo.org), is Jesús Vicente-21 Carbajosa ([email protected]). 22
Z.A, R.I-F, M.M and I.D performed the experiments and P.C and J.V-C 23 conceived and supervised the experiments; J.V-C, P.C and R.I-F wrote the 24 article with the contributions from other authors. 25
26
Email addresses: 27
Z.A.: [email protected] 28
R.I.F.: [email protected] 29
M.M.: [email protected] 30
I.D.: [email protected] 31
P.C.: [email protected] 32
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on February 26, 2016, as DOI:10.1104/pp.16.00092
Copyright 2016 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
SUMMARY 33
Accumulation of storage compounds in the starchy endosperm of developing 34
cereal seeds is highly regulated at the transcriptional level. These compounds, 35
mainly starch and proteins, are hydrolyzed upon germination to allow seedling 36
growth. The transcription factor HvGAMYB is a master activator both in the 37
maturation phase of seed development and upon germination, acting in 38
combination with other transcription factors. However, the precise mechanism 39
controlling the switch from maturation to germination programs remains unclear. 40
We report here the identification and molecular characterization of barley 41
HvVP1 (Viviparous-1), orthologous to ABI3 from Arabidopsis. HvVP1 transcripts 42
accumulate in the endosperm and the embryo of developing seeds at early 43
stages, and in the embryo and aleurone of germinating seeds up to 24 hours of 44
imbibition (hoi). In transient expression assays, HvVP1 controls the activation of 45
Hor2 and Amy6.4 promoters exerted by HvGAMYB. HvVP1 interacts with 46
HvGAMYB in yeast and in the plant nuclei, hindering its interaction with other 47
transcription factors involved in seed gene expression programs, like BPBF. 48
Similarly, this interaction leads to a decrease in the DNA-binding of HvGAMYB 49
and BPBF to their targets sequences. Our results indicate that the HvVP1 50
expression pattern controls the full Hor2 expression activated by GAMYB and 51
BPBF in the developing endosperm, and the Amy6.4 activation in post-52
germinative reserve mobilization mediated by GAMYB. All these data 53
demonstrate the participation of HvVP1 in antagonistic gene expression 54
programs and support its central role as a gene expression switch during seed 55
maturation and germination. 56
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
3
INTRODUCTION 57
Seed development after fertilization has been classically divided into two 58
major phases: zygotic embryogenesis and maturation (Goldberg et al., 1994). 59
The maturation phase (MAT) is characterized by gene expression programs 60
devoted to the synthesis and accumulation of reserve compounds, among them 61
Seed Storage Proteins (SSPs) and, later on, to the acquisition of desiccation 62
tolerance, with an important role for the Late Embryogenic Abundant proteins 63
(LEAs; Vicente-Carbajosa and Carbonero, 2005). In most species of the 64
Spermatophyta, seeds acquire a quiescent state at the end of the maturation 65
phase that is resumed by the germination process (GER), which is generally 66
accepted to comprise the germination sensu stricto from seed imbibition to root 67
emergence that is followed by reserve mobilization. These two distinct phases 68
are independently regulated and influenced by genetic and environmental 69
factors (Bewley, 1997; Finch-Savage and Leubner-Metzger, 2006; Nonogaki et 70
al., 2007; Holdsworth et al., 2008; Iglesias-Fernández et al., 2011a; González-71
Calle et al., 2015). During early post-germination (reserve mobilization), several 72
genes encoding hydrolytic enzymes (i.e.: α-amylases, proteases and lipases) 73
catalyze the hydrolysis of carbohydrates, proteins and lipids present in the seed 74
storage tissues, such as the endosperm of Monocotyledonous species and the 75
cotyledons of Dicotyledonous ones, with the aim of nourishing the growing 76
embryo before attaining its full photosynthetic capacity (Pritchard et al., 2002; 77
González-Calle et al., 2014; Iglesias-Fernández et al., 2014). 78
The comprehensive molecular and genetic mechanisms controlling seed 79
development and germination still remain elusive, due mainly to the many 80
environmental and intrinsic parameters influencing it. From a physiological 81
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4
point of view, it is generally accepted that an increased Abscisic 82
Acid/Gibberellins (ABA/GA) ratio determines the progression of seed 83
maturation, by promoting the expression of SSPs, LEAs, Heat Shock Proteins 84
(HSPs), and Anthocyanin biosynthesis genes (Reidt et al., 2000; Koornneef et 85
al., 2002; Vicente-Carbajosa and Carbonero, 2005; Braybrook and Harada, 86
2008; Finkelstein et al., 2008). By contrast, an increased GA/ABA ratio is the 87
most important factor for the integration of the environmental and intrinsic 88
signals for the occurrence of germination (Kucera et al., 2005). This enhanced 89
GA/ABA balance raises the expression of hydrolase genes such as those 90
encoding Cell Wall Remodeling Enzymes (CWREs), involved in the weakening 91
of the embryo surrounding tissues during germination sensu stricto, and of 92
Reserve Mobilization Enzymes in post-germination (RMEs; Gubler et al., 1995; 93
1999; Mena et al., 2002; Iglesias-Fernández et al., 2011b, c; González-Calle et 94
al., 2015). 95
In cereal seeds, the transcription factor (TF) of the B3 family Viviparous-1 96
(VP1), orthologous to ABA-Insensitive-3 (ABI3) from Arabidopsis thaliana, is a 97
key component of the ABA signaling and is required for expression of the 98
maturation program (McCarty et al., 1991; Parcy et al., 1994; Jones et al., 1997; 99
Nambara et al. 2000; Suzuki et al.,2001; Lara et al., 2003; Zeng et al., 2003; To 100
et al., 2006; Swaminathan et al., 2008; Yan et al., 2014). The Viviparous-1 101
mutants, like vp1 in Zea mays or abi3 in Arabidopsis thaliana, are characterized 102
by the incapacity of entering the quiescent state at the end of the maturation 103
phase, and by displaying premature features of the subsequent germination and 104
post-germination phases, leading to a precocious germination of the seeds still 105
in the mother plant (pre-harvest sprouting; McCarty et al., 1989; Gubler et al., 106
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5
2005). It has been previously described that the VP1 TF, through its binding to 107
the specific RY cis-element (5´-CATGCA-3´) and through protein-protein 108
interactions with other TFs of the bZIP family, regulates the expression of seed 109
maturation specific genes, such as those encoding the Em protein in the wheat 110
caryopsis and the C1 (MYB-like) transcription factor, a key regulator of the 111
anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway in maize (Paz-Ares et al., 1986; Hattori et al., 112
1992; Vasil et al., 1995). VP1 has been also associated with repression of post-113
germination genes, since in the maize vp1 mutant, alpha-amylase activity is 114
precociously observed in the kernels while still in the corn cob, indicating that all 115
necessary factors for its activation are already present during the maturation 116
phase, and in support that the VP1 protein must be preventing this hydrolytic 117
activity (Hoecker et al., 1999; Rodríguez et al., 2015). 118
In the last twenty years, an important number of barley TFs, such as GAMYB, 119
BPBF (HvDOF24), SAD (HvDOF23) and BLZ2 (a bZIP orthologous to the maize 120
OPAQUE-2), have been characterized as central regulators of gene expression 121
in the seed maturation and post-germination (reserve mobilization) programs 122
(Gubler et al, 1995; Mena et al., 1998; 2002; Oñate et al., 1999; Díaz et al., 123
2002; Isabel-LaMoneda et al., 2003). However, their possible relationship with 124
the barley VP1 has not been investigated, although similar interactions have 125
been reported in other cereal species (Hill et al., 1996; Hobo et al., 1999), and 126
for ABI3 and AtbZIP10/AtbZIP25 (BLZ2 orthologs) with a role in activating the 127
expression of SSP genes upon seed maturation in A. thaliana (Lara et al., 128
2003). 129
130
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
6
In this work, the barley VP1 gene (HvVP1) has been characterized and 131
its expression localized, by mRNA in situ hybridization experiments, to the 132
embryo and the endosperm of barley seeds, both during maturation and upon 133
germination. In transient expression experiments in immature barley 134
endosperms and in aleurone layers of germinating seeds, HvVP1 interferes with 135
the transcriptional activation exerted by GAMYB on the promoters of the genes 136
Hor2 and Amy6.4, encoding a B-hordein (SSP) and a high-pI α-amylase, 137
respectively. By yeast 2-hybrid (Y2H) and Bimolecular Fluorescence 138
Complementation (BiFC) assays, the HvVP1-GAMYB protein interaction has 139
been confirmed in vivo and in plant nuclei. Interestingly, the presence of HvVP1 140
not only diminishes the GAMYB-BPBF protein interaction in yeast three hybrid 141
(Y3H) assays, but HvVP1 also decreases the binding affinities of GAMYB and 142
BPBF for their corresponding cis-elements in the promoters of the Hor2 and 143
Amy6.4 genes in Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs). All these data 144
indicate a central role for HvVP1 as a gene expression switch at key stages of 145
seed maturation and germination. 146
147
RESULTS 148
The HvVP1 Sequence Identification and Phylogenetic Dendrogram 149
The sequence and structure of the predicted VIVIPAROUS-1 gene 150
(HvVP1), isolated from a barley (cv Igri) genomic library (Supplemental Fig. S1) 151
was confirmed by sequencing the corresponding Open Reading Frame (ORF) 152
derived from a PCR amplified cDNA from developing barley seeds (20 days 153
after pollination, dap). This sequence was compared with other VP1 sequences 154
from different barley cvs (Igri, Morex, Haruna Nijo) and with its orthologs in 155
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
7
other Gramineae deposited in public databases: Triticum aestivum (TaVP1), 156
Triticum turgidum (TtVP1), Triticum monococum (TmVP1), Brachypodium 157
distachyon (BdVP1) and Oryza sativa (OsVP1), and with AtABI3 from 158
Arabidopsis thaliana. The HvVP1 gene is a single copy gene (Supplemental 159
Fig. S2). The deduced HvVP1 protein sequence from cv Igri is more than 99% 160
identical with those from cv. Morex (International Barley Genome Sequencing 161
Consortium, 2012), and from cv Haruna Nijo (Matsumoto et al., 2011), and with 162
the VP1 partial sequence of cv. Himalaya in the Genbank (AAO06117.1; 163
Casaretto and Ho, 2003). A phylogenetic tree including these sequences has 164
been constructed (Fig. 1A) and HvVP1 is included in the same branch as those 165
of the Triticeae tribe species with a bootstrap value of 100%. This phylogenetic 166
tree is further supported by the occurrence of common motives (MEME 167
analysis, Fig. 1B; Table 1). All sequences share motives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14 and 15, 168
with the exception of motif 3 that is only partially conserved in AtABI3. 169
According to Nakamura and Toyama (2001), motif 3 corresponds to the 170
activation domain (A), motives 15 and 2 form the B1 domain, motif 5 matches 171
with the B2 domain, and motives 1, 4 and 14 integrate the B3 (DNA-binding) 172
domain. VP1 proteins from members of the Triticeae tribe (TaVP1, TtVP1, 173
TmVP1 and HvVP1) share motives 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 19 and 20, and all the VP1 174
proteins in the Poaceae genomes compared, share motives 6, 13, 17, 18 and 175
21. 176
The deduced amino-acid sequences encoded by these VP1 genes have 177
nuclear localization signals (RKKR), molecular weights of 72-75 kDa and 178
isoelectric points between 6.4-8.8 (Supplemental Table 1). The HvVP1 gene 179
contains six exons (solid bars) and five introns (lines; Fig. 2A) as determined by 180
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
8
comparing the genomic and cDNA clones. While domains A, B1 and B2 181
(containing the nuclear localization signal RKKR; Graeber et al., 2010) are 182
encoded in the first exon, the B3 DNA-binding domain is translated from exons 183
II-VI. 184
185
Activation properties of the HvVP1 protein 186
To investigate the activation capacity of HvVP1 in yeast, a series of 187
constructs containing different regions of the HvVP1 ORF was prepared (Fig. 188
2B). These regions were cloned as translational fusions to the GAL4 DNA 189
binding domain into a yeast expression plasmid and tested as effectors for their 190
capacity to transactivate two alternative reporter genes: LacZ encoding a β-191
galactosidase assayed in liquid cultured cells, and HIS3 that promotes yeast 192
growth in a histidine depleted agar medium. Both, in qualitative (His-) and in 193
quantitative (β-Gal, Miller Units, M.U.) assays, HvVP1 acts as a potent activator 194
in yeast (~450 β-Gal M.U.). However, when domain A is deleted, the reporter 195
expression disappears, indicating that this region is essential for HvVP1 being a 196
transcriptional activator in yeast. 197
198
HvVP1 is expressed in the Embryo and in the Endosperm during Seed 199
Maturation and Germination 200
Cereal VP1 proteins, as Arabidopsis ABI3, belong to a sub-family of B3 201
TFs controlling seed gene expression (Swaminathan et al., 2008). 202
Consequently, it is expected that the HvVP1-mRNA should be expressed during 203
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
9
barley seed maturation and germination. To test this, total RNA was isolated 204
from developing de-embrionated seeds (endosperms at 5, 10, 15, 20 dap), 205
immature (20 dap) and mature dry embryos, and from aleurones and embryos 206
of germinating seeds at different times of imbibition (8, 16, 24, 48, 72 hours of 207
imbibition, hoi). Northern blot analysis (Fig. 3) shows that the HvVP1 transcripts 208
are found both in developing endosperms, attaining maximum levels at 5 dap, 209
decreasing thereafter (20 dap), and in immature and mature embryos, being 210
more abundant at the immature stage (Fig. 3A). The HvVP1 transcripts are 211
expressed upon seed germination in the aleurone layer, reaching a peak at 24 212
hoi, and also in embryos (Fig. 3B). mRNA in situ hybridization experiments 213
during seed maturation (20 dap) and upon germination (24 hoi) reveal that 214
HvVP1 transcripts are present throughout the seed (embryo and endosperm) 215
during maturation, while its expression is restricted to the embryo and the 216
aleurone layer upon germination (Figs. 3A, 3B). The HvVP1 transcripts are not 217
found in leaves and roots of barley adult plants (our data not shown). 218
219
HvVP1 counteracts the HvGAMYB Trans-Activation exerted on 220
Endosperm specific Genes during Seed Maturation and Germination 221
The HvGAMYB is a barley MYB-R2R3 protein that is a transcriptional 222
activator of seed storage protein genes (B-hordeins: HvHor2) during seed 223
maturation and of hydrolase genes (α-amylases: HvAmy6.4) needed for reserve 224
mobilization in post-germination (Gubler et al., 1995; 1999; Díaz et al., 2002). 225
Taking into account that both HvVP1 (Fig. 3) and HvGAMYB share 226
similar spatial expression patterns in the seed, as occurs with other important 227
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
10
seed specific TFs (Supplemental Fig. S4), transient expression assays were 228
done by co-bombardment in barley developing endosperms and in germinating 229
aleurones to investigate their mutual effects. In Figure 4A, the schematic 230
description of the constructs used in the trans-activation study is shown. The 231
transcription factors HvVP1 and HvGAMYB were used as effectors. As reporter 232
constructs, the HvHor2 promoter (-560 bp upstream of the ATG initiation codon) 233
and the HvAmy6.4 gene promoter (-174 bp) were fused to the GUS reporter 234
gene (PHor2:uidA and PAmy6.4:uidA). As shown in Fig. 4B, while co-bombardment 235
of developing barley endosperms with HvVP1 and PHor2:uidA reduces GUS 236
activity to half that driven by the PHor2:uidA construct alone, co-transfection with 237
HvGAMYB and PHor2:uidA provokes an increment of GUS activity of ~5-fold. 238
When both TFs (HvVP1 and HvGAMYB) are co-bombarded together with 239
PHor2:uidA, the positive trans-activation of PHor2:uidA exerted by HvGAMYB 240
diminishes drastically (Fig. 4B). Similarly, Fig. 4C shows that while co-241
bombardment of HvVP1 with PAmy6.4:uidA diminishes GUS activity to half that 242
driven by the reporter gene alone (PAmy6.4:uidA), co-transfection of HvGAMYB 243
and PAmy6.4:uidA increases GUS activity more than ~8-fold, and co-244
bombardment of both TFs reduces the GUS activity of the reporter construct to 245
half that obtained when HvGAMYB is the only transfected TF. This repressor 246
effect of HvVP1 is independent of the presence of GA (1μM) added to the 247
incubation medium (Supplemental Fig. S5). In summary, HvVP1 is a 248
transcriptional repressor of maturation and germination seed genes. 249
250
HvVP1 interacts with HvGAMYB in the Yeast Two-Hybrid System and in 251
Plant Nuclei 252
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
11
To explore whether the repression exerted by the HvVP1 TF on the 253
trans-activation mediated by HvGAMYB on seed specific genes during 254
maturation and germination could be due to a direct HvVP1-HvGAMYB protein-255
protein interaction, yeast two-hybrid and bimolecular fluorescence 256
complementation assays have been done. 257
LacZ and HIS3 reporter activities were measured in yeast two-hybrid 258
assays (Fig. 5). The HvVP1-N terminal cDNA, encoding 464 amino-acid 259
residues, spanning domains A, B1 and B2 (Fig. 2A), was translationally fused to 260
the yeast GAL4 activation domain (AD), and the full-length cDNA of HvGAMYB 261
was fused to the GAL4 binding domain (BD; Fig. 5B). In Fig. 5C, yeast cells 262
(strain SFY526) transformed with the GAL4BD-HvGAMYB construct show 263
detectable background levels of LacZ reporter activity, and this activity sharply 264
increases (~400 β-Gal M.U.) when this strain is co-transformed with the 265
GAL4AD-HvVP1-N construct. Expression of the HIS3 gene (strain HF7C), 266
conferring histidine auxotrophy, was used to confirm the interaction between 267
HvGAMYB and HvVP1N (Fig. 5C). Yeast cells containing GAL4BD-HvGAMYB 268
and the GAL4AD-Ø constructs are not able to grow in 3-aminotriazol (3-AT) 269
concentrations higher than 30 mM. However, when transformed with GAL4BD-270
HvGAMYB and GAL4AD-HvVP1N constructs, yeast cells grow even at 60 mM 271
of 3-AT. All these results support that the HvGAMYB and HvVP1 proteins 272
interact in vivo. 273
In order to corroborate the HvVP1-HvGAMYB interaction, bimolecular 274
fluorescence complementation experiments were done in planta. With this aim, 275
HvVP1 and HvGAMYB ORFs were translationally fused to the N- and C- 276
terminal fragments, respectively, of the green fluorescent protein encoding gene 277
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
12
(GFP; Díaz et al., 2005) and used for co-bombardment experiments in onion 278
epidermal cells. Microscopic observations show that the GFP fluorescence is 279
reconstituted and targeted to the nucleus, indicating that HvVP1 and HvGAMYB 280
proteins interact in plant nuclei (Fig. 6). As expected, there is no detectable 281
GFP when the GFP fragments are bombarded alone (data not shown). 282
283
HvVP1 interferes with the HvGAMYB-BPBF Interaction in vivo and with 284
their DNA Binding in Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSA) 285
Since we showed that HvVP1 and GAMYB proteins can physically 286
interact, we wanted to determine whether the HvVP1 protein could interfere with 287
the binary complex formed by HvGAMYB and BPBF-HvDOF24, previously 288
reported (Díaz et al., 2002) For this purpose a yeast three-hybrid (Y3H) system 289
was used, based on the pBridgeTM vector, which allows the simultaneous 290
expression of two proteins. In this case, the Gal4BD-BPBF translational fusion 291
and the HvVP1-ORF, the latter conditionally expressed under the control of the 292
Met25 promoter (PMet25) that responds to the methionine (Met) supply in the 293
medium. The Gal4AD-HvGAMYB construction was used as the third component 294
of the system (Fig. 7A). In this Y3H system and in the absence of Met in the 295
yeast growth medium, the joint expression of HvGAMYB-AD and BPBF-BD 296
increases the reporter gene activity (>80 β-Gal M.U.), compared to the 297
expression of BPBF alone (~40 β-Gal M.U.), as expected for a positive 298
interaction between the two proteins. However, this activity diminishes when 299
HvVP1 is present (~60 β-Gal M.U.; Fig. 7B) suggesting that HvVP1 interferes 300
with the interaction between HvGAMYB and BPBF. 301
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
13
The specific DNA-protein interaction between BPBF (HvDOF24) and its 302
corresponding cis motif (Prolamine Box, PB: 5´-TGTAAAG-3´), and between 303
HvGAMYB and the MYB-R2R3 box (5´-TAACAAC-3´) at the promoter region of 304
the HvHor2 gene have been previously reported (Mena et al., 1998; Díaz et al., 305
2002). The potential effect of HvVP1 in modifying these protein-DNA 306
interactions was investigated by Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSA; 307
Fig. 7C). HvVP1, HvGAMYB and BPBF proteins produced in E. coli were 308
assayed for their binding activities using two [32P]-labeled DNA probes 309
containing the MYB-R2R3 and the Prolamine Box binding sites, derived from 310
the HvHor2 promoter (Fig. 7C). While a clear retarded band is observed when 311
HvGAMYB or BPBF) protein extracts are incubated with their respective probes, 312
the addition of increasing amounts of HvVP1 protein to the reactions leads to 313
fainter, or even to the absence of retarded bands. Notably, HvVP1 does not 314
bind to any of the probes used containing the PB/GLM motives (target binding 315
sites of BPBF and BLZ2, respectively) or the MYB-R2R3 box (target binding site 316
of GAMYB) in support of its direct interference with the binding of these 317
proteins. Interestingly, modification of DNA-binding by HvVP1 seems to be 318
specific, since the intensity of the retarded bands in EMSAs for SAD 319
(HvDOF23) was decreased in the presence of HvVP1, while the contrary effect 320
(enhancement) was observed for the bZIP protein BLZ2 (Supplemental Fig. S6) 321
322
HvVP1 counteracts the Transcriptional Activation of BPBF on the HvHor2 323
gene promoter 324
BPBF is a barley DOF transcription factor that acts as a transcriptional 325
activator of the endosperm specific gene HvHor2 during seed maturation (Mena 326
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
14
et al., 1998), and the BPBF transcripts are abundant during the seed maturation 327
and germination phases (Supplemental Fig. S4). 328
As BPBF shares similar spatial expression patterns during seed 329
development with HvVP1, and the binding of its encoded protein for the PB box 330
is drastically decreased by HvVP1 (EMSA in Fig. 7C), we decided to perform 331
transient expression assays by particle bombardment in developing barley 332
endosperms to explore the in planta effects of the coexpression of both TFs. 333
Figure 8A schematically shows the constructs used in the transactivation study, 334
where BPBF and HvVP1 were tested as effectors on GUS reporter activity 335
driven by the PHor2:uidA construct. As shown in Fig. 8B, co-bombardment of 336
barley developing endosperms with the HvVP1 effector and PHor2:uidA reporter, 337
diminishes GUS activity to half that of PHor2:uidA alone, whereas co-transfection 338
with BPBF and PHor2:uidA provokes an increment of GUS activity of ~7-fold. 339
When both HvVP1 and BPBF are co-bombarded, the positive PHor2:uidA trans-340
activation exerted by BPBF is reduced to ~ half. This result demonstrates that 341
HvVP1 counteracts the activation of BPBF upon the HvHor2 gene in developing 342
barley endosperms. 343
344
DISCUSSION 345
In this work, we have identified the Viviparous-1 (HvVP1) gene of 346
Hordeum vulgare cv. Igri and explored its function in the control of gene 347
expression programs during seed development and germination. In particular, 348
we address the role of HvVP1 through its interaction with HvGAMYB, a key 349
transcription factor that participates in the regulation of both MAT and GER 350
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
15
genes in the barley seed. Our work unveils important features of HvVP1 action 351
derived from its precise spatio-temporal expression patterns in the seed, and its 352
capacity to modulate regulatory complexes in which HvGAMYB participates. We 353
propose a general model (Figure 9) that integrates the data presented here with 354
current knowledge derived from previous studies in the cereal seed. 355
356
HvVP1 effects during barley seed development 357
In Hordeum vulgare, several TFs such as HvGAMYB, BPBF and the 358
bZIPs BLZ1 and BLZ2 (Vicente-Carbajosa et al., 1997; Mena et al., 1998; 359
Vicente-Carbajosa et al., 1998; Oñate et al., 1999; Díaz et al., 2002), acting as 360
part of regulatory complexes have been reported to participate in the regulation 361
of maturation genes like SSPs (B-hordein; gene HvHor2). Among them, the 362
HvGAMYB protein activates transcription of the HvHor2 gene by binding to the 363
corresponding MYB-R2R3 box (5´-TAACAAC-3´) in its promoter. Moreover, 364
HvGAMYB physically interacts with BPBF (Díaz et al., 2002) and together 365
significantly increase the trans-activation of the HvHor2 promoter in developing 366
barley endosperms as compared with the transactivation of each TF considered 367
separately. 368
In this work we have performed a detailed expression analysis of HvVP1 during 369
seed development to define its precise expression pattern. Since HvVP1 is a 370
known regulator of seed maturation genes, we wanted to survey its potential 371
effect on key regulatory factors controlling this process. As a first step, we 372
explored HvVP1 action on the transactivation of the HvHor2 promoter mediated 373
by HvGAMYB and demonstrate that HvVP1 interferes with its activation 374
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
16
capacity (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, our work shows that HvVP1 and HvGAMYB 375
interact in vivo both in yeast (Y2H) and in plant nuclei, in support that a direct 376
HvVP1-GAMYB protein-protein interaction takes place. Thus, we considered 377
whether the observed negative effects on the HvGAMYB-mediated 378
transactivation are derived from the HvVP1-HvGAMYB interaction.. 379
Interestingly, our results show that HvVP1 interferes with the HvGAMYB-BPBF 380
interaction (Y3H assays; Fig. 7 A & B), and also reduces the binding affinity of 381
both HvGAMYB and BPBF for their corresponding cis- motives in the HvHor2 382
promoter (Fig. 7C). However, as reflected in our proposed model (Fig 9) this 383
repressing activity of HvVP1 is not displayed on maturation genes (e.g. Hor2) in 384
the developing starchy endosperm, due to a non-overlapping temporal pattern 385
of expression. Notably, HvVP1 transcript levels decrease as maturation 386
progresses while the expression of HvGAMYB and BPBF increases, hindering 387
the possibility of HvGAMYB being kidnapped by HvVP1 and rendering a fully 388
operative activation complex. 389
Besides the HvVP1 expression pattern in the starchy endorsperm, its 390
persistence in the developing aleurone and immature embryos would favor the 391
repression of the α-amylase and other germination related genes, necessary for 392
acquisition of primary dormancy and for avoidance of pre-harvest sprouting, as 393
has been previously documented for its orthologs in maize and Arabidopsis 394
(Parcy et al., 1994; Hoecker et al., 1995). 395
396
HvVP1 effects during barley germination and post-germination phases 397
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
17
After root protrusion (post-germination), different genes encoding 398
hydrolytic enzymes, such as α-amylases, proteases, etc. that mobilize storage 399
reserves, are expressed in the aleurone. In the promoters of these genes a 400
conserved tripartite cis-acting element, the GA-Responsive Complex (GARC), 401
has been described to contain a GA-Responsive Element (GARE, 5’-402
TAACAAA-3’), the pyrimidine box (5’-CCTTTT-3’) and the 5’-TATCCAC-3’ box 403
(Sun and Gubler, 2004). In barley, the interaction of these three cis-elements 404
with TFs belonging to the MYBR2R3 (HvGAMYB), DOF (BPBF and three 405
others) and MYBR1-SHAQKYF (HvMCB1, HvMYBS3) families has been 406
demonstrated (Gubler, et al. 1999; Mena et al. 2002; Isabel-Lamoneda et al. 407
2003; Rubio-Somoza et al. 2006a, b; Moreno-Risueño et al. 2007). HvGAMYB 408
is considered the master regulator of hydrolase gene expression, and is highly 409
induced by GA in the aleurone of germinating seeds (Gubler et al. 1999, 2002). 410
In agreement with our observations during seed maturation, our results show 411
that HvVP1 also interferes with the HvGAMYB trans-activation of the Amy6.4 412
promoter in germinating aleurone cells (Fig. 4C). Again, this effect is sustained 413
by our disclosure that the interaction with HvVP1 leads to a decreased affinity of 414
GAMYB and other TFs (SAD- HvDOF23) to their DNA targets, as well as to the 415
interference in their protein-complex formation. Accordingly, HvGAMYB-416
dependent activation of post-germination genes can only be achieved once 417
HvVP1 expression disappears from the germinating aleurone. 418
As reflected in our model (Fig. 9), our results show that upon seed 419
imbibition HvVP1 is highly expressed in the mature embryo and in the aleurone 420
up to 24 hoi (the time at which root protrusion occurs), then sharply decaying, in 421
contrast to HvGAMYB whose expression rises up to 48 hoi (Diaz et al., 2002). 422
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
18
Taken together, these data indicate that HvVP1 not only prevents premature 423
expression of post-germination genes (encoding α-amylases, proteases, etc.), 424
but also that its disappearance during post-germination is required for 425
mobilization of reserves to take place. The transcriptional repression of 426
hydrolase genes mediated by VP1/ABI3 during germination has been previously 427
reported in monocot- and dicot- seeds, in species like maize, tomato and 428
Arabidopsis (Hoecker et al., 1999; Nambara et al., 2000; Bassel et al., 2006). 429
430
431
In conclusion, the precise spatio-temporal expression of HvVP1 allows 432
the fine-tune regulation of maturation and germination programs both within 433
distinct seed compartments and at different developmental stages. As disclosed 434
here, HvVP1 action occurs mainly by modulating the DNA-binding capacity and 435
protein-protein interactions of transcription factors, like HvGAMYB and BPBF 436
that participate in different regulatory complexes. 437
The HvVP1 effects described here rely mostly on its repressing activity or 438
the alternative activation derived from its release. In addition, an intrinsic 439
activation capacity has also been reported for the VP1/ABI3 proteins. In 440
particular, in non-endospermic seeds, commonly found in dicot plants like 441
Arabidopsis thaliana, ABI3 has been described as an activator of maturation 442
(SSP) and LEA genes, as reflected by their impaired expression in abi3 mutants 443
(Parcy et al., 1994). Moreover, ectopic over-expression of ABI3 (35S::ABI3) in 444
conjunction with bZIP factors (AtbZIP10, AtbZIP25, AtbZIP53) induces some of 445
the SSP genes in vegetative tissues, in support that ABI3 is a positive regulator 446
of SSP gene expression (Lara et al., 2003; Alonso et al., 2009). In this respect, 447
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
19
the observation that HvVP1 functions as a transcriptional repressor of the 448
HvHor2 promoter upon seed maturation is not contradictory, since in 449
Arabidopsis SSP and LEA proteins are expressed in the embryo, in contrast to 450
their accumulation in the cereal endosperm. Moreover, globulin storage proteins 451
similar to those of non-endospermic seeds are accumulated in the embryos of 452
cereal seeds and display a similar positive regulation under VP1, in support of a 453
conserved function of VP1/ABI3 in the control of SSP gene expression. Hence, 454
the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulatory properties of VP1/ABI3 455
proteins seem to be preserved, but differentially displayed in the context of 456
endosperm and embryo where interactions with a different set of trasnscription 457
factors occur. 458
459
460
461
462
MATERIALS AND METHODS 463
Plant Material and Growth Conditions 464
Barley (Hordeum vulgare) cv. Bomi seeds were germinated in the dark, 465
stratified at 4°C for four days, and then, grown in the greenhouse. Developing 466
endosperms (5, 10, 15 and 20 days after pollination; dap) and germinating 467
seeds (16, 24, 48 and 72 h of imbibition; hoi) were frozen in liquid N2 and stored 468
at -80 °C until used for RNA extraction. 469
Developing endosperms from cv. Bomi (15 dap) and aleurone layers 470
peeled off from barley cv. Himalaya germinating seeds (48 hoi) were collected 471
for particle bombardment experiments, and used immediately. 472
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
20
473
Screening of a Barley Genomic Library 474
A Lambda phage FIX II genomic library from 8 days old barley seedlings 475
(cv. Igri; Agilent Technologies), representing 16 x 108 plaque forming units 476
(pfu)/ml, was plated after infection of the Escherichia coli strain XL1-Blue MRA 477
(Agilent Technologies). The plaques were transferred onto nylon membranes 478
that were hybridized with a specific probe of 465-bp fragment obtained by PCR 479
with primers derived from conserved sequences of previously described VP1 480
genes in other cereals (Genebank references: Avena fatua: AJ001140; Oryza 481
sativa cv. Japonica, D16640.1; Sorghum bicolor, AF249881.1; Triticum 482
aestivum, AB047554.1; Zea mays, M60214.1; for primers see Supplemental 483
Table S2). This fragment spanned the B3 domain and a 3´-end conserved 484
region, and was α-[32P]-labeled, following standard procedures. Pre-485
hybridization, hybridization and membrane washing were done as described 486
(Vicente-Carbajosa et al., 1998). The in vivo excision properties of the Lambda 487
phage FIX II vector system have allowed the recovery of selected clones in the 488
pBluescript SK plasmid for sequencing (Agilent Technologies). 489
The HvVP1 ORF was obtained by PCR from cDNA isolated from 490
developing barley seeds (20 dap; see Supplemental Table S2), and its 491
corresponding deduced protein appears in Supplemental Fig. S1. 492
493
Bioinformatic Resources: HvVP1 Identification, Phylogenetic Dendrogram 494
and Transcriptomic Analysis 495
Identification of the HvVP1 genomic sequence (AJ431703.1) and its 496
corresponding deduced protein (CAD24413.1) was done using the bioinformatic 497
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
21
tools at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) and the National 498
Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) databases. The Interpro Program 499
(PFAM database; Bateman et al., 2002; http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk) was used to 500
confirm the presence of the B3 DNA-binding domain. 501
The deduced protein sequences of VP1 genes were obtained from public 502
databases: those of Hordeum vulgare cv. Morex (International Barley Genome 503
Sequencing Consortium, 2012), and those from cvs Himalaya and Haruna Nijo 504
(HvVP1), Triticum aestivum (TaVP1), Triticum turgidum (TtVP1) and Triticum 505
monococcum (TmVP1) from Genbank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/); 506
and those of Brachypodium distachyon (BdVP1), Oryza sativa (OsVP1) and 507
Arabidopsis thaliana (AtABI3) from Phytozome v8.0 Database (Goodstein et al., 508
2012; www.phytozome.net). These sequences were aligned by means of the 509
CLUSTAL W program (Thompson et al., 1994) and utilized to construct a 510
phylogenetic dendrogram, using the neighbour-joining algorithm, a bootstrap 511
analysis with 1,000 replicates, complete deletion and the Jones Taylor Thornton 512
matrix, as settings. The MEME program software version 6.0 (Tamura et al., 513
2013) was used to identify conserved motives within the deduced VP1 proteins 514
and to validate the phylogenetic tree (Table 1). Default parameters were used, 515
except for: the maximum number of motives to find that was set to 21 and the 516
minimum width to 6 amino-acid residues (Bailey et al., 2009; 517
http://meme.sdsc.edu/meme4_6_0/intro.htlm). A single capital letter is given 518
when the frequency of a residue is greater than twice that of the second most 519
frequent one at the same position. A pair of capital letters in brackets represent 520
two residues with a relative frequency sum of >75%. When these criteria are not 521
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
22
satisfied, a lower-case letter is set when the relative frequency of a residue is 522
>40%, if not, x is given. 523
The major biochemical parameters of the deduced VP1 proteins are 524
listed in Supplemental Table S1. Both Isoeletric points (Ip) and Molecular 525
Weights (MW) were predicted using the “Compute pI/MW” tool (Gasteiger et al., 526
2005; http://www.expasy.ch/tools/pi_tool.html). 527
The in silico transcriptomic analysis of genes HvVP1, HvGAMYB, BPBF 528
and BLZ2 in Hordeum vulgare cv. Morex (Supplemetal Fig. S4) was done using 529
the Hordeum eFP browser at the Bio-Analytic Resource for Plant Biology 530
(http://bar.utoronto.ca/efpbarley/cgi-bin/efpWeb.cgi; Druka et al., 2006). For 531
identification of the probe sets for HvVP1, HvGAMYB, BPBF and BLZ2 532
transcription analysis the PLEXdb Blast was used 533
(http://www.plexdb.org/modules/tools/plexdb_blast.php). 534
Total RNA Isolation and Northern Blot Analysis 535
Total RNA was isolated from 1-2 g of barley developing de-embrionated 536
seeds (endosperms at 5, 10, 15, 20 dap), immature (20 dap) and mature dry 537
embryos, germinating aleurones and germinating embryos (8, 16, 24, 48, 72 538
hoi). After electrophoresis and transfer to nylon membranes, hybridization was 539
carried out at 68 °C, following standard procedures (Moreno-Risueño et al., 540
2007). A 280 bp fragment at the 3´-UTR (nt 3528-3808) was used as a specific 541
HvVP1 probe (see Supplemental Table S2). The 18S-RNA gene was used as a 542
control for sample charge. 543
544
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
23
mRNA In Situ Hybridization Experiments 545
The protocol described here is a modification of that described in Lara et 546
al. (2003). Barley developing (20 dap) and germinating seeds (24 hoi) were 547
collected and fixed in 4% para-formaldehyde (w/v), embedded in paraffin, 548
sectioned to 8 µm and de-waxed. An antisense or sense digoxigenin (DIG)-549
labelled RNA probes, corresponding to the same DNA fragment (280 bp) used 550
for Northern blots (see Supplemental Table S2), were synthesized with the DIG 551
RNA labelling mix and hybridization was at 56ºC overnight. Antibody incubation 552
and colour detection was done according to the manufacturer’s instructions 553
(Boehringer Ingelheim). 554
555
Yeast 1-, 2- and 3-Hybrid Assays 556
For yeast 2-Hybrid (Y2H) assays, the effector plasmids pGBT9 and 557
pGAD424 (Clontech), which contain the alcohol dehydrogenase I (AdhI) 558
promoter fused to the Gal4 DNA binding domain (Gal4BD; pGBT9 bait vector) 559
or to the Gal4 DNA activation domain (Gal4AD; pGAD424 prey vector), 560
respectively, were used to generate translational fusions with HvVP1, 561
HvGAMYB, BPBF ORFs or with selected fragments derived from HvVP1 that 562
were cloned into the EcoRI-BamHI sites by a PCR strategy. The haploid strains 563
SFY526 and HF7c of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Clontech), carrying the LacZ 564
(β-galactosidase) and HIS3 (imidazole glycerol phosphate dehydratase) 565
reporter genes, under the control of a truncated Gal1 promoter that contains 566
Gal4-responsive elements (Gal1UAS), were used. 567
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
24
For yeast 3-Hybrid (Y3H) assays, the BPBF and the HvVP1 ORFs were 568
cloned into the pBridgeTM vector (Clontech) in the Multiple Cloning Sites I and II 569
(MCSI and MCSII), respectively. The BPBF ORF was cloned into the EcoRI-570
BamHI sites of MSCI fused to the GAL4 binding domain, and that of HvVP1 into 571
the NotI-BglII sites (MSCII) by a PCR strategy (see Table S2 for primer 572
sequences). Gal4AD-HvGAMYB (pGAD424 vector) previously used for Y2H 573
assays was used as the third component. The pBridgeTM vector allows the 574
conditional expression of a second gene under the control of the MET25 575
promoter (PMET25) in response to methionine (Met) levels in the medium. 576
All the Y2H and Y3H assays were done following the manufacture´s 577
instructions (Clontech). 578
579
580
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) 581
Essentially, HvVP1 and HvGAMYB ORFs were translationally fused to 582
the N- or to the C-terminal encoding fragments of the Green Fluorescent Protein 583
(GFP) gene ORF by using a PCR strategy and subsequent subcloning into the 584
two versions of the psmRS-GFP plasmid (psmRS-N-GFP or psmRS-C-GFP). 585
Final constructs were used to co-bombard inner epidermal cell layers of fresh 586
onions (Allium cepa) using a biolistic Helium gun device (DuPont PDS-1000; 587
BioRad Laboratories), as previously described (Díaz et al., 2005). The 588
fluorescence emission was observed after 36 h of incubation at 22ºC in the 589
dark, with a Carl Zeiss Axiophot fluorescence microscope (filter parameters: 590
excitation 450-490 nm; emission 520 nm). As a control of nuclei localization, the 591
onion cell layers were stained with DAPI (Serva). 592
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
25
Transient Expression Assays in Barley Developing Endosperms and in 593
germinating Aleurone Layers 594
The reporter vectors, containing the promoters of genes Hor2 (encoding 595
a B-hordein) and Amy6.4 (encoding a high-Ip barley α-amylase), PHor2 and 596
PAmy6.4, fused to the GUS reporter gene were previously described (Mena et al., 597
1998, 2002). The effector constructs corresponding to HvVP1, HvGAMYB and 598
BPBF, were prepared by cloning the corresponding ORFs in the pMF6 plasmid 599
under the control of the 35S CaMV promoter followed by the first intron of the 600
maize AdhI gene (35S-I); using a PCR strategy, followed by subcloning at the 601
EcoRI-BamHI sites of this plasmid. Particle bombardment and subsequent GUS 602
evaluation were carried out with a biolistic helium gun device (DuPont PSD-603
1000) as previously described (Mena et al., 1998, 2002; Díaz et al., 2002). 604
605
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs) 606
Translational fusions of HvVP1, HvGAMYB, BPBF, SAD and BLZ2 ORFs 607
to the glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene were prepared by cloning their 608
ORFs into the expression vector pGEX-2T (Pharmacia). To this purpose, a PCR 609
strategy was done followed by the sub-cloning of these ORFs into the BamHI-610
EcoRI sites of the pGEX-2T plasmid (see Supplemental Table S2). Induction of 611
recombinant proteins with 0.1 mM IPTG (Isopropyl-β-d-Thio-Galato-Pyranoside) 612
and preparation of the E. coli protein extracts were performed as previously 613
described (Vicente-Carbajosa et al., 1997). 614
Two probes containing, one of them, the binding sites for HvVP1 besides 615
those for BLZ2 and BPBF (PB/GLM, see Fig. 7C) and the other that for 616
GAMYB (5´-TAACAAC-3´) within the Hor-2 promoter (PHor2), were produced by 617
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
26
annealing complementary single-stranded oligonucleotides that generate 618
protruding ends (see Supplemental Table S2). These probes were end-labeled 619
with [32P]-dATP by the fill-in reaction (Klenow exo-free DNA polymerase; United 620
States Biochemical) and purified from an 8% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis 621
(39:1 cross-linking). The DNA-protein binding reactions and the EMSA 622
experiments were done, as described previously, using 1 ng of [32P]-labeled 623
probes (Moreno-Risueño et al., 2008). 624
625
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 626
We thank Mar González for excellent technical assistance. 627
628
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 629
Supplemental Fig. S1. Structure of the HvVP1 gene derived from cv. Igri. 630
Predicted intron-exon boundaries were confirmed by sequencing of the 631
corresponding cDNA; splicing signals are underlined. The deduced encoded 632
protein sequence is shown (in blue). 633
Supplemental Fig. S2. Gene copy number of HvVP1. Total DNA from barley 634
leaves was digested with restriction endonucleases: BamHI (B), EcoRI (E), SacI 635
(S), XbaI (X) and hybridized with a specific probe derived from 3´-non coding 636
region of the gene. 637
Supplemental Fig. S3. Comparison of the VP1 deduced sequences from 638
Hordeum vulgare cv. Igri (HvVP1), cv Morex (MLOC_69727), cv Haruna Nijo 639
(BAK06992.1), and a partial sequence from cv Himalaya (AAO06117.1). 640
Supplemental Fig. S4. Pictographic representation of HvVP1, GAMYB, BPBF 641
and BLZ2 transcript accumulation during seed development (5 to 22 dap) by 642
using the barley eFP browser of the Bio-Analytic Resource for Plant Biology 643
(http://bar.utoronto.ca/efpbarley/cgi-bin/efpWeb.cgi). 644
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
27
Supplemental Fig. S5. Transactivation assays using as effectors HvVP1 and 645
BPBF, and as reporter the Amy6.4 gene promoter driving the expression of the 646
uidA gene in the presence of gibberellins (GA). 647
Supplemental Fig. S6. Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSA) of the 648
recombinant proteins BLZ2 (bZIP family) and SAD (DOF family) with the 649
PB/GLM probe derived from the Hor2 gene promoter containing the cis-650
interacting motives for SAD and BLZ2 in the presence or absence of HvVP1. 651
Supplemental Table S1. Major characteristics of VP1/ABI3 predicted proteins. 652
Suppemental Table S2. Oligonucleotide sequences of primers used. 653
654
655
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
28
LEGENDS TO FIGURES 656
Figure 1. A, Phylogenetic tree with the deduced amino acid sequences of the 657
VP1 genes from distinct cvs of Hordeum vulgare (HvVP1 Igri, Morex and 658
Haruna Nijo) , Triticum aestivum (TaVP1), Triticum turgidum (TtVP1), Triticum 659
monococum (TmVP1), Brachypodium distachyon (BdVP1) and Oryza sativa 660
(OsVP1), and with AtABI3 from Arabidopsis thaliana; bootstrapping values are 661
specified in the branches. B, Distribution of the conserved motives among the 662
deduced protein sequences in the dendrogram (A), found by means of the 663
MEME analysis. A, B1, B2, and B3 correspond to conserved domains, as 664
described by Nakamura and Toyama (2001) and Marella and Quatrano (2007). 665
666
Figure 2. A, HvVP1 transcript splicing model. Exons I to VI are indicated as 667
solid bars. Motives A, B1, B2 and B3, as in Figure 1. B, Functional assay in 668
yeast for the activation capacity of the HvVP1 protein. Different constructs (1-6) 669
are generated as fusions to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain (black box at the N-670
terminus) and the activation capacity assayed in two alternative reporter 671
systems: ß-Galactosidase activity (LacZ reporter gene; Miller´s Units in liquid 672
medium), and HIS3 (growth capacity in Histidine depleted medium). 673
674
Figure 3. HvVP1 expression analyses by Northern Blot and by mRNA in situ 675
hybridization analysis, in barley developing (A) and germinating seeds (B). A.1 676
Northern blot analyses, 8 μg of total RNA from developing endosperms (from 5, 677
10, 15, 20 dap) and immature (25 dap) and mature embryos has been loaded in 678
each lane and hybridized to an HvVP1 gene-specific probe. A.2 HvVP1 679
transcript localization in longitudinal sections of developing (25 dap) seeds by 680
mRNA in situ hybridization B.1 Northern blot analysis in germinating aleurone 681
(16, 24, 48, 72 hoi) and germinating embryo (8, 16, 24 hoi). B.2 HvVP1 682
transcript localization in germinating barley seeds (36 hoi), by mRNA in situ 683
hybridization assays. Left and right panels correspond to hybridizations with 684
HvVP1 antisense and sense probes, respectively. The EtBr-stained rRNA 685
picture is included as a loading control. e: endosperm, em: embryo; p: pericarp; 686
s: scutellum. 687
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
29
Figure 4. Trans-activation assays using as effectors the TFs HvVP1 and 688
HvGAMYB. The Hor2 and Amy6.4 gene promoters driving the expression of the 689
uidA gene (GUS activity) were used as reporters. A, Schematic representation 690
of the effector and reporter constructs used in the analyses. B, Co-691
bombardment in barley developing endosperms of the effector and reporter 692
combinations indicated. C, The effector and reporter constructs designated 693
were co-bombarded in germinating aleurones from barley kernels. The relative 694
amounts of reporter and effector plasmids used in these assays correspond to 695
the 1:1 ratio. Values are the means ± SE of three independent replicates. 696
697
Figure 5. Protein-protein interaction by yeast two-hybrid assays. A, The 698
structures of HvGAMYB and HvVP1 are depicted showing the location of 699
functionally relevant domains within the proteins. B, HvGAMYB (complete ORF) 700
or HvVP1 N464 (the 464 N-terminal aminoacid residues) expressed as 701
translational fusions to the Gal4 DNA-binding (BD) and Activation Domains 702
(AD), respectively. C, Interaction capacity assayed by measuring the ß-703
Galactosidase activity (LacZ reporter gene; Miller Units in liquid medium) and in 704
D, by evaluating the yeast growth capacity in a Histidine depleted medium 705
(reporter gene: HIS3) with increasing concentrations of 3-aminotriazole (3-AT). 706
707
Figure 6. In planta interaction of HvVP1 and HvGAMYB. A, Structure of gene 708
constructs used in Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) assays 709
using particle gun transformation of onion (Allium cepa) epidermal cells. B, 710
Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) reconstruction in the nuclei of cells 711
transformed with a combination of the constructs described above (b). Bright 712
field images (a) and 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining used to 713
reveal nuclei within the cells (c). 714
Figure 7. Protein-protein interactions of HvVP1, GAMYB and BPBF in yeast 715
3-hybrid experiments (Y3H) and the effect of HvVP1 on GAMYB and BPBF 716
DNA-binging capacities. A, Schematic representation of the constructs used in 717
the Y3H assays, where the BPBF-ORF was translationally fused to the Gal4 718
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
30
DNA binding domain (BD) in the pBridgeTM plasmid harboring HvVP1 under a 719
Methionine (Met) repressible promoter. The GAMYB-ORF was translationally 720
fused to the Gal4 activation domain (AD) in pGAD424. B, Schematic 721
representation of the constructs used for the Y3H assays and quantification of 722
β-galactosidase activity (expressed as Miller’s units) in liquid assays using for 723
the constructs represented above. The proteins expressed in Met-depleted 724
medium are indicated at the right side of the panel. C, EMSAs of HvGAMYB 725
and BPBF proteins in the absence (-) or presence (+) of the HvVP1 protein. 726
Incubations were done with a specific 32P-labeled probe containing a target 727
site for the corresponding transcription factors. MBS: MYB Binding Site 728
(GAMYB), PB: Prolamin Box (BPBF) , GLM: G-Box Like-Motif (BLZ2). 729
730
Figure 8. Transactivation assays using, as effectors, the TFs HvVP1 and BPBF 731
and, as reporter, the Hor2 gene promoter driving the expression of the uidA 732
gene (GUS activity). A, Schematic representation of the effector and the 733
reporter constructs used in the analyses. B, Co-bombardment experiments on 734
barley developing endosperms using the indicated combination of effector and 735
reporter constructs. The relative amount of reporter to effector plasmids used in 736
these assays corresponds to the 1:1 ratio. Values are means ± SE of three 737
independent replicates. 738
739
Figure 9. Proposed model of transcriptional regulation of SSP (Hor2) and 740
hydrolase (Amy6.4) genes in barley seeds mediated by HvVP1 interacting with 741
GAMYB, DOF (BPBF, SAD), BLZ2 and MR1 (MYBR1) TFs, during the 742
maturation and post-germination phases. The starchy endosperm and the 743
embryo plus aleurone layer are considered separately. Relative gene 744
expression levels are indicated in the y-axis. The dotted vertical line indicates 745
the time of root emergence. 746
747
748
749
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
31
Table 1 Sequences of conserved amino acid motives (MEME; Bailey et al. 750 2009) of the VIVIPAROUS-1 orthologous genes from Hordeum vulgare, 751 Triticum monococcum, Triticum turgidum, Triticum aestivum, Oryza sativa, 752 Brachypodium distachyon and Arabidopsis thaliana. 753
RKKR: Nuclear Localization Signal underlined in bold. 754 755
756
757
758
Motif E-value Consensus sequences
1 4.0e-377 DIGTS[QR]VW[SN]MRYRFWPNNKSRMYLLENTGDFVRSNELQEGDFIV[LI]YSDVK 2 8.8e-310 NNR[DE]CISAEDLRSIRL[RK]RSTIEAAAARLGGGRQGTMQLLKLILTWVQNHH 3 3.3e-175 DDFMFA[QD]DTFPALPDFPCLSSPSSS[TN]FSSSSSSNSSSAF 4 1.1e-150 DKNLRFLLQKVLKQSDVG[TS]LGRIVLPK[KE][EA] 5 3.6e-109 MEP[AS]AT[RK]EARKKRMARQRRLS[CS] 6 1.6e-097 EPSEPAAAGDG[MV]DDL[SA]DID[HQ]LLDFAS[IL][NS] 7 1.1e-149 YEFP[TA]ETGAAAATSWMPYQAFSPT[AG]SYGGEA[MI]YPFQQGCST 8 1.4e-151 DMHAGAWPLQYAAFVPAGATSAGTQTYPMPPPG[AP]VPQPFAAPGFAGQFPQ 9 5.4e-101 DDVPWDDEPLFPDVGMMLEDVISEQQ[QL]QQ
10 5.7e-101 KYLIRGVKVRA[AQ]Q[EG]LAKHKN[AG]SPEKGGAS[DE]VKA 11 2.1e-112 LQQQRSQQLNLSQIQTGGFPQE[PQ]SPRAAHSAPV
12 1.5e-123 [HG]W[SG][PG][PL][AW][VT]Q[AQ][QA][PV][HQ]GQLM[IV]QVPNPLSTKSNSSRQKQQKPSPDAAARPPSGGA
13 5.3e-087 EDGGCKEKSPHGVRRSRQEA[AS] 14 5.0e-080 ETHLPELKT[GR]DGISI 15 2.4e-071 GGG[GS][STG]GSAADDLP[RAL]FFMEWL[TK] 16 8.2e-074 LQKKRPRVGAMDQEAPPAGGQLPSPGANP 17 4.4e-042 SSV[VA]VSSQPFSPPAA 18 8.1e-042 [AH]P[QR][GR][GS][GA]P[HR]RGK[GA]PAVEIR[HQ]GE 19 1.2e-036 [HY]G[AT][AG]GR[TV]AS[DH]AA[AG]GGGEDAFM 20 2.6e-029 [ST][PQ][QH]R[PQ]GQA[AS]AS[DN]KQRQQGA[RS][TR][PT]AAAP[AP]AG 21 1.6e-026 MNQMAVSI
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
32
LITERATURE CITED 759
Alonso R, Oñate-Sánchez L, Weltmeier F, Ehlert A, Diaz I, Dietrich K, 760
Vicente-Carbajosa J, Dröge-Laser W (2009) A pivotal role of the basic 761
leucine zipper transcription factor bZIP53 in the regulation of Arabidopsis 762
seed maturation gene expression based on heterodimerization and protein 763
complex formation. Plant Cell 21:1747-61 764
Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, Ren J, Li 765
WW, Noble WS (2009) MEME SUITE: tools for motifs discovery and 766
searching. Nucleic Acid Res 37: W202–W208. 767
Bassel GW, Mullen RT, Bewley JD (2006) ABI3 expression ceases following, 768
but not during, germination of tomato and Arabidopsis seeds. J Exp Bot 769
57: 1291–1297 770
Bateman A, Birney E, Cerruti L, Durbin R, Etwiller L, Eddy SR, Griffiths-771
Jones S, Howe KL, Marshall M, Sonnhammer EL (2002) The Pfam 772
protein families database. Nucleic Acid Res 30: 276–280. 773
Bewley JD (1997) Seed germination and dormancy. Plant Cell 9: 1055–1066 774
Braybrook SA, Harada JJ (2008) LECs go crazy in embryo development. 775
Trends Plant Sci 13: 624–630 776
Casaretto J, Ho TH (2003) The transcription factors HvABI5 and HvVP1 are 777
required for the abscisic acid induction of gene expression in barley 778
aleurone cells. Plant Cell 15: 271–284 779
Diaz I, Martinez M, Isabel-LaMoneda I, Rubio-Somoza I, Carbonero P (2005) 780
The DOF protein, SAD, interacts with GAMYB in plant nuclei and activates 781
transcription of endosperm-specific genes during barley seed 782
development. Plant J 42: 652–662 783
Diaz I, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Abraham Z, Martínez M, Isabel-La Moneda I, 784
Carbonero P (2002) The GAMYB protein from barley interacts with the 785
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
33
DOF transcription factor BPBF and activates endosperm-specific genes 786
during seed development. Plant J 29: 453–464 787
Druka A, Muehlbauer G, Druka I, Caldo R, Baumann U, Rostoks N, 788
Schreiber A, Wise R, Close T, Kleinhofs A, Graner A, Schulman A, 789
Langridge P, Sato K, Hayes P, McNicol J, Marshall D, Waugh R (2006) 790
An atlas of gene expression from seed to seed through barley 791
development. Funct Integr Genomics 6: 202–211 792
Finch-Savage WE, Leubner-Metzger G (2006) Seed dormancy and the control 793
of germination. New Phytol 171: 501–523 794
Finkelstein RR, Gampala SS, Rock CD (2002) Abscisic acid signaling in 795
seeds and seedlings. Plant Cell 4 Suppl: S15–S45 796
Finkelstein R, Reeves W, Ariizumi T, Steber C (2008) Molecular aspects of 797
seed dormancy. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59: 387–415 798
Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, Duvaud S, Wilkins MR, Appel RD, 799
Bairoch A (2005) Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy 800
server. In Walker JK ed, The proteomics protocols handbook. Humana 801
Press, New York, pp 571–607 802
González-Calle V, Barrero-Sicilia C, Carbonero P, Iglesias-Fernández R 803
(2015) Mannans and endo-β-mannanases (MAN) in Brachypodium 804
distachyon: expression profiling and possible role of the BdMAN genes 805
during coleorhiza-limited seed germination. J Exp Bot: erv168 806
González-Calle V, Iglesias-Fernández R, Carbonero P, Barrero-Sicilia C 807
(2014) The BdGAMYB protein from Brachypodium distachyon interacts 808
with BdDOF24 and regulates transcription of the BdCathB gene upon 809
seed germination. Planta 240: 539–552 810
Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R, Neupane R, Hayes RD, Fazo J, Mitros T, 811
Dirks W, Hellsten, U, Putnam N, Rokhsar DS (2012) Phytozome: a 812
comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 813
D1178–1186 814
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
34
Graeber K, Linkies A, Müller K, Wunchova A, Rott A, Leubner-Metzger G. 815
2010. Cross-species approaches to seed dormancy and germination: 816
conservation and biodiversity of ABA-regulated mechanisms and the 817
Brassicaceae DOG1 genes. Plant Mol Biol. 73: 67–87 818
Gubler F, Chandler PM, White RG, Llewellyn DJ, Jacobsen JV (2002) 819
Gibberellin signaling in barley aleurone cells. Control of SLN1 and GAMYB 820
expression. Plant Physiol 129: 191–200 821
Gubler F, Kalla R, Roberts JK, Jacobsen JV (1995) Gibberellin-regulated 822
expression of a myb gene in barley aleurone cells: evidence for Myb 823
transactivation of a high-pI alpha-amylase gene promoter. Plant Cell 7: 824
1879–1891 825
Gubler F, Raventos D, Keys M, Watts R, Mundy J, Jacobsen JV (1999) 826
Target genes and regulatory domains of the GAMYB transcriptional 827
activator in cereal aleurone. Plant J 17: 1–9 828
Gubler F, Millar AA, Jacobsen JV (2005) Dormancy release, ABA and pre-829
harvest sprouting. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8: 183–187 830
Hattori T, Vasil V, Rosenkrans L, Hannah LC, McCarty DR, Vasil IK (1992) 831
The Viviparous-1 gene and abscisic acid activate the C1 regulatory gene 832
for anthocyanin biosynthesis during seed maturation in maize. Genes Dev 833
6: 609–618 834
Hill A, Nantel A, Rock CD, Quatrano RS (1996) A conserved domain of the 835
Viviparous-1 gene product enhances the DNA binding activity of the bZIP 836
protein EmBP-1 and other transcription factors. J Biol Chem 27:3366-74 837
838
Hobo T, Kowyama Y, Hattori T (1999) A bZIP factor, TRAB1, interacts with 839
VP1 and mediates abscisic acid-induced transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci 840
U S A. 96:15348-53 841
Hoecker U, Vasil IK, McCarty DR (1995) Integrated control of seed maturation 842
and germination programs by activator and repressor functions of 843
Viviparous-1 of maize. Genes Dev 9: 2459–2469 844
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
35
Hoecker U, Vasil IK, McCarty DR (1999) Signaling from the embryo conditions 845
Vp1-mediated repression of alpha-amylase genes in the aleurone of 846
developing maize seeds. Plant J 19: 371–377 847
Holdsworth MJ, Bentsink L, Soppe WJJ (2008) Molecular networks 848
regulating Arabidopsis seed maturation, after-ripening, dormancy and 849
germination. New Phytol 179: 33–54 850
Iglesias-Fernández R, Rodríguez-Gacio MC, Matilla AJ (2011a) Progress in 851
research on afterripening. Seed Sci Res 21: 69–80 852
Iglesias-Fernández R, Rodríguez-Gacio MC, Barrero-Sicilia C, Carbonero 853
P, Matilla AJ (2011b) Three endo-β-mannanase genes expressed in the 854
micropylar endosperm and in the radicle influence germination of 855
Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. Planta 233: 25–36 856
Iglesias-Fernández R, Rodríguez-Gacio MC, Barrero-Sicilia C, Carbonero 857
P, Matilla AJ (2011c) Molecular analysis of endo-β-mannanase genes 858
upon seed imbibition suggests a cross-talk between radicle and micropylar 859
endosperm during germination of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signal Behav 860
6: 80–82 861
Iglesias-Fernández R, Wozny D, Iriondo-de Hond M, Oñate-Sánchez L, 862
Carbonero P, Barrero-Sicilia C (2014) The AtCathB3 gene, encoding a 863
cathepsin B-like protease, is expressed during germination of Arabidopsis 864
thaliana and transcriptionally repressed by the basic leucine zipper protein 865
GBF1. J Exp Bot 65: 2009–2021 866
International Barley Genome Sequencing Consortium, Mayer KF, Waugh 867
R, Brown JW, Schulman A, Langridge P, Platzer M, Fincher GB, 868
Muehlbauer GJ, Sato K, Close TJ, Wise RP, Stein N (2012) A physical, 869
genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome. Nature 870
491: 711–716 871
Isabel-LaMoneda I, Diaz I, Martinez M, Mena M, Carbonero P (2003) SAD: a 872
new DOF protein from barley that activates transcription of a cathepsin 873
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
36
B-like thiol protease gene in the aleurone of germinating seeds. Plant J 874
33: 329–340 875
Jones HD, Peters NC, Holdsworth MJ (1997) Genotype and environment 876
interact to control dormancy and differential expression of the 877
VIVIPAROUS 1 homologue in embryos of Avena fatua. Plant J 12: 911–878
920 879
Koornneef M, Bentsink L, Hilhorst H (2002) Seed dormancy and germination. 880
Curr Opin Plant Biol 5: 33–36 881
Lara P, Oñate-Sánchez L, Abraham Z, Ferrándiz C, Díaz I, Carbonero P, 882
Vicente-Carbajosa J (2003) Synergistic activation of seed storage protein 883
gene expression in Arabidopsis by ABI3 and two bZIPs related to 884
OPAQUE2. J Biol Chem 278: 21003–21011 885
Marella HH, Quatrano RS (2007) The B2 domain of VIVIPAROUS1 is bi-886
functional and regulates nuclear localization and transactivation. Planta 887
225: 863–872 888
Matsumoto T, Tanaka T, Sakai H, Amano N, Kanamori H, Kurita K, Kikuta 889
A, Kamiya K, Yamamoto M, Ikawa H, Fujii N, Hori K, Itoh T, Sato K. 890
2011. Comprehensive sequence analysis of 24,783 barley full-length 891
cDNAs derived from 12 clone libraries. Plant Physiol. 156: 20–28 892
McCarty DR, Carson CB, Stinard PS, Robertson DS (1989) Molecular 893
analysis of viviparous-1: an abscisic acid-insensitive mutant of maize. 894
Plant Cell 1: 523–532 895
McCarty DR, Hattori T, Carson CB, Vasil V, Lazar M, Vasil IK (1991) The 896
Viviparous-1 developmental gene of maize encodes a novel transcriptional 897
activator. Cell 66: 895–905 898
Mena M, Cejudo FJ, Isabel-Lamoneda I, Carbonero P (2002) A role for the 899
DOF transcription factor BPBF in the regulation of gibberellin-responsive 900
genes in barley aleurone. Plant Physiol 130: 111–119 901
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
37
Mena M, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Schmidt RJ, Carbonero P (1998) An 902
endosperm-specific DOF protein from barley, highly conserved in wheat, 903
binds to and activates transcription from the prolamin-box of a native B-904
hordein promoter in barley endosperm. Plant J 16: 53–62 905
Moreno-Risueño MA, Díaz I, Carrillo L, Fuentes R, Carbonero P (2007) The 906
HvDOF19 transcription factor mediates the abscisic acid-dependent 907
repression of hydrolase genes in germinating barley aleurone. Plant J 51: 908
352–365 909
Moreno-Risueño MA, González N, Díaz I, Parcy F, Carbonero P, Vicente-910
Carbajosa J (2008) FUSCA3 from barley unveils a common 911
transcriptional regulation of seed-specific genes between cereals and 912
Arabidopsis. Plant J 53: 882–894 913
Nakamura S, Toyama T (2001) Isolation of a VP1 homologue from wheat and 914
analysis of its expression in embryos of dormant and non-dormant 915
cultivars. J Exp Bot 52: 875–876 916
Nambara E, Hayama R, Tsuchiya Y, Nishimura M, Kawaide H, Kamiya Y, 917
Naito S (2000) The role of ABI3 and FUS3 loci in Arabidopsis thaliana on 918
phase transition from late embryo development to germination. Dev Biol 919
220: 412–423 920
Nonogaki H, Chen F, Bradford KJ (2007) Mechanisms and genes involved in 921
germination sensu stricto. In Bradford K y Nonogaki H eds, Seed 922
development, dormancy and germination. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 923
264–304 924
Oñate L, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Lara P, Díaz I, Carbonero P (1999) Barley 925
BLZ2, a seed-specific bZIP protein that interacts with BLZ1 in vivo and 926
activates transcription from the GCN4-like motif of B-hordein promoters in 927
barley endosperm. J Biol Chem 274: 9175–9182 928
Parcy F, Valon C, Raynal M, Gaubier-Comella P, Delseny M, Giraudat J 929
(1994) Regulation of gene expression programs during Arabidopsis seed 930
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
38
development: roles of the ABI3 locus and of endogenous abscisic acid. 931
Plant Cell 6: 1567–1582 932
Paz-Ares J, Wienand U, Peterson PA, Saedler H. (1986) Molecular cloning of 933
the c locus of Zea mays: a locus regulating the anthocyanin pathway. 934
EMBO J 5: 829-833 935
Pritchard SL, Charlton WL, Baker A, Graham IA (2002) Germination and 936
storage reserve mobilization are regulated independently in Arabidopsis. 937
Plant J. 31: 639–647 938
Reidt W, Wohlfarth T, Ellerström M, Czihal A, Tewes A, Ezcurra I, Rask L, 939
Bäumlein H (2000) Gene regulation during late embryogenesis: the RY 940
motif of maturation-specific gene promoters is a direct target of the FUS3 941
gene product. Plant J 21: 401–408 942
Rodríguez MV, Barrero JM, Corbineau F, Gubler F, Benech-Arnold RL 943
(2015) Dormancy in cereals (not too much, not so little): about the 944
mechanisms behind this trait. Seed Sci Res 25: 99–119 945
Rubio-Somoza I, Martinez M, Abraham Z, Diaz I, Carbonero P (2006a) 946
Ternary complex formation between HvMYBS3 and other factors 947
involved in transcriptional control in barley seeds. Plant J 47: 269–281 948
Rubio-Somoza I, Martinez M, Diaz I, Carbonero P (2006b) HvMCB1, a 949
R1MYB transcription factor from barley with antagonistic regulatory 950
functions during seed development and germination. Plant J 45: 17–30 951
Sun TP, Gubler F. (2004) Molecular mechanism of gibberellin signaling in 952
plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55: 197-223. 953
Suzuki M, Kao CY, Cocciolone S, McCarty DR (2001) Maize VP1 954
complements Arabidopsis abi3 and confers a novel ABA/auxin 955
interaction in roots. Plant J 28:409–418. 956
Swaminathan K, Peterson K, Jack T (2008) The plant B3 superfamily. Trends 957
Plant Sci 13: 647–655 958
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
39
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: 959
Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30: 960
2725–2729 961
Thompson J, Higgins D, Gibson T (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the 962
sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence 963
weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. 964
Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673–4680 965
To A, Valon C, Savino G, Guilleminot J, Devic M, Giraudat J, Parcy F 966
(2006) A network of local and redundant gene regulation governs 967
Arabidopsis seed maturation. Plant Cell 18: 1642–1651 968
Vasil V, Marcotte WR Jr, Rosenkrans L, Cocciolone SM, Vasil IK, Quatrano 969
RS, McCarty DR (1995) Overlap of Viviparous1 (VP1) and abscisic acid 970
response elements in the Em promoter: G-box elements are sufficient but 971
not necessary for VP1 transactivation. Plant Cell 7: 1511–1508 972
Vicente-Carbajosa J, Carbonero P (2005) Seed maturation: developing an 973
intrusive phase to accomplish a quiescent state. Int J Dev Biol 49: 645–974
651 975
Vicente-Carbajosa J, Moose SP, Parsons RL, Schmidt RJ (1997) A maize 976
zinc-finger protein binds the prolamin box in zein gene promoters and 977
interacts with the basic leucine zipper transcriptional activator Opaque2. 978
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 7685–7690 979
Vicente-Carbajosa J, Oñate L, Lara P, Diaz I, Carbonero P (1998) Barley 980
BLZ1: a bZIP transcriptional activator that interacts with endosperm-981
specific gene promoters. Plant J 13: 629–640 982
Yan D, Duermeyer L, Leoveanu C, Nambar E (2014) The functions of the 983
endosperm during seed germination. Plant Cell Physiol 55: 1521-1533 984
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
40
Zeng Y, Raimondi N, Kermode AR (2003) Role of an ABI3 homologue in 985
dormancy maintenance of yellow-cedar seeds and in the activation of 986
storage protein and Em gene promoters. Plant Mol Biol 51: 39–49 987
Zeng Y, Zhao T, Kermode AR (2013) A conifer ABI3-interacting protein plays 988
important roles during key transitions of the plant life cycle. Plant Physiol 989
161: 179–195 990
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure1
Figure1.A,Phylogene,ctreewiththededucedaminoacidsequencesoftheVP1genesfromdis,nctcvsofHordeumvulgare(HvVP1Igri,MorexandHarunaNijo),Tri8cumaes8vum(TaVP1),Tri8cumturgidum(TtVP1),Tri8cummonococum(TmVP1),Brachypodiumdistachyon(BdVP1)andOryzasa8va(OsVP1),andwithAtABI3fromArabidopsisthaliana;bootstrappingvaluesarespecifiedinthebranches.B,Distribu,onoftheconservedmo,vesamongthededucedprotein
sequencesinthedendrogram(A),foundbymeansoftheMEMEanalysis.A,B1,B2,
andB3correspondtoconserveddomains,asdescribedbyNakamuraandToyama
(2001)andMarellaandQuatrano(2007).
HvVP1(Igri) 18 3 6 9 19 15 2 16 7 17 8 5 11 12 20 4 14 1 10 13 21HvVP1(Morex) 18 3 6 9 19 15 2 16 7 17 8 5 11 12 20 4 14 1 10 13 21HvVP1 (Haruna) 18 3 6 9 19 15 2 16 7 17 8 5 11 12 20 4 14 1 10 13 21
TmVP1 18 3 6 9 19 15 2 16 7 17 8 5 11 12 20 4 14 1 10 13 21TaVP1 18 3 6 9 19 15 2 16 7 17 8 5 11 12 20 4 14 1 10 13 21TtVP1 18 3 6 9 19 15 2 16 7 17 8 5 11 12 20 4 14 1 10 13 21OsVP1 18 3 6 15 2 7 17 5 11 4 14 1 13 21BdVP1 18 3 6 15 2 17 5 4 14 1 13 21AtABI3 3 15 2 5 4 14 1
A B1 B2 B3
A
B
90
100100
100
10099 HvVP1 (Igri)
HvVP1 (Morex)HvVP1 (Haruna Nijo)
TtVP1TaVP1
OsVP1BdVP1AtABI3
TriticeaeTmVP1
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
I II III IV V VI
A B1 B3B2
1 24- 127 182 - 375 381- 408 519- 629 682 bp
A
BA B1 B3B2BD
A B1 B2BD
ABD
B1 B2BD
B3BD
1
2
3
4
5
ß-Gal M.U. His-
12345
200 400 6000
Figure2.A,HvVP1transcriptsplicingmodel.ExonsItoVIareindicatedassolidbars.
Mo,ves A, B1, B2 and B3, as in Figure 1. B, Func,onal assay in yeast for the
ac,va,oncapacityoftheHvVP1protein.Differentconstructs(1-6)aregeneratedas
fusions to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain (black box at the N-terminus) and the
ac,va,on capacity assayed in two alterna,ve reporter systems: ß-Galactosidase
ac,vity (LacZ reporter gene; Miller´s Units in liquid medium), and HIS3 (growthcapacityinHis,dinedepletedmedium).
Figure2
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure3.HvVP1expressionanalysesbyNorthernBlotandbymRNA insituhybridiza,onanalysis,inbarleydeveloping(A)andgermina,ngseeds(B).A.1Northernblotanalyses,8
μgoftotalRNAfromdevelopingendosperms(from5,10,15,20dap)andimmature(25
dap)andmatureembryoshasbeenloadedineachlaneandhybridizedtoanHvVP1gene-specificprobe.A.2HvVP1transcriptlocaliza,oninlongitudinalsec,onsofdeveloping(25dap) seeds by mRNA in situ hybridiza,on B.1 Northern blot analysis in germina,ng
aleurone(16,24,48,72hoi)andgermina,ngembryo(8,16,24hoi).B.2HvVP1transcriptlocaliza,oningermina,ngbarleyseeds(36hoi),bymRNAinsituhybridiza,onassays.Lecand right panels correspond to hybridiza,onswithHvVP1 an,sense and sense probes,respec,vely.TheEtBr-stainedrRNApictureisincludedasaloadingcontrol.e:endosperm,
em:embryo;p:pericarp;s:scutellum.
Figure3
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 4. Trans-ac,va,on assays using as effectors the TFsHvVP1 andHvGAMYB. The
Hor2andAmy6.4genepromotersdrivingtheexpressionoftheuidAgene(GUSac,vity)were used as reporters. A, Schema,c representa,on of the effector and reporter
constructsusedintheanalyses.B,Co-bombardmentinbarleydevelopingendospermsof
the effector and reporter combina,ons indicated. C, The effector and reporter
constructs designated were co-bombarded in germina,ng aleurones from barley
kernels. The rela,ve amounts of reporter and effector plasmids used in these assays
correspondtothe1:1ra,o.Valuesarethemeans±SEofthreeindependentreplicates
P35S
I-ADHI
A" Effectors
PAmy 6.4 (- 174 bp) uidA
PAmy 6.4 :uidA
100
400
900
Rel
GU
S A
ctiv
ity (%
)
PHor2 (- 560 bp)
Reporters
B"
100
300
500
HvVP1 HvGAMYB
1 2 3 4
Rel
GU
S A
ctiv
ity (%
) PHor2:uidA
C"
HvVP1
--
-+
+-
++
Seed Maturation
Seed Germination
HvVP1 HvGAMYB
1 2 3 4
--
-+
+-
++
HvGAMYB
Tnos
Tnos
Figure4
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
A
A B1 B3B2
1 24- 127 182- 375 381- 408 519- 629 682
A1BD
1 4- 150 151- 230 356- 490 553
A2
HvVP1HvGAMYB
AD / BD Constructs
Gal4 ADGal4 BD
HvVP1 N1 +
HvGAMYB2 +
HvGAMYB3
464
HvVP1 N464
100
200
300
400
1 2 3
β-G
al M
.U.
0 mM
60 mM
45 mM
30 mM
15 mM
AD-Ø[ 3-AT ] AD-HvVP1 N
BD-HvGAMYB
+
C
B
D
Figure5.Protein-protein interac,onbyyeast two-hybridassays.A,ThestructuresofHvGAMYBandHvVP1aredepictedshowingtheloca,onoffunc,onallyrelevant
domainswithintheproteins.B,HvGAMYB(completeORF)orHvVP1N464 (the464
N-terminalaminoacidresidues)expressedastransla,onalfusionstotheGal4DNA-
binding (BD) and Ac,va,on Domains (AD), respec,vely. C, Interac,on capacity
assayedbymeasuringtheß-Galactosidaseac,vity(LacZreportergene;MillerUnits
in liquidmedium)and inD,byevalua,ng theyeastgrowthcapacity inaHis,dine
depleted medium (reporter gene: HIS3) with increasing concentra,ons of 3-aminotriazole(3-AT).
Figure5
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 6. In planta interac,on of HvVP1 and HvGAMYB. A, Structure of gene
constructsused inBimolecularFluorescenceComplementa,on (BiFC)assaysusing
par,cle gun transforma,on of onion (Allium cepa) epidermal cells. B, Green
Fluorescent Protein (GFP) reconstruc,on in thenuclei of cells transformedwith a
combina,onoftheconstructsdescribedabove(b).Brightfieldimages(a)and4’,6-
diamidino-2-phenylindole(DAPI)stainingusedtorevealnucleiwithinthecells(c).
A
B
a
b
c
HvVP1
GAMYB
p35S
p35S nos
nos GFP-N
GFP-C
Figure6
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure7.Protein-proteininterac,onsofHvVP1,GAMYBandBPBFinyeast3-hybridexperiments
(Y3H) and the effect of HvVP1 on GAMYB and BPBF DNA-binging capaci,es. A, Schema,c
representa,onoftheconstructsusedintheY3Hassays,wheretheBPBF-ORFwastransla,onally
fusedtotheGal4DNAbindingdomain(BD) inthepBridgeTMplasmidharboringHvVP1undera
Methionine (Met) repressiblepromoter. TheGAMYB-ORFwas transla,onally fused to theGal4
ac,va,ondomain(AD) inpGAD424.B,Schema,crepresenta,onoftheconstructsusedforthe
Y3H assays and quan,fica,on of β-galactosidase ac,vity (expressed asMiller’s units) in liquid
assays using for the constructs represented above. The proteins expressed in Met-depleted
mediumareindicatedattherightsideofthepanel.C,EMSAsofHvGAMYBandBPBFproteinsin
theabsence(-)orpresence(+)oftheHvVP1protein.Incuba,onsweredonewithaspecific32P-
labeled probe containing a target site for the corresponding transcrip,on factors. MBS: MYB
BindingSite(GAMYB),PB:ProlaminBox(BPBF),GLM:G-BoxLike-Mo,f(BLZ2).
A
1!
GAMYB2!
VP1!BPBF!4!
BPBF!3!
B
VP1!BPBF!
GAMYB
- Met
- Met
| | | |
ß-Gal M.U.!
Gal4 ADGal4 BD
CGAMYB
+ + +
BPBF
- - - + + + +- - - - HvVP1
GAMYB probe (1) PB/GLM probe (2)
(1): CATATCTTAACAACCCACACACGATT
(2): GTGACATGTAAAGTGAATAAGGTGAGTCATGCA
1 + 3!
1 + 4!
2 + 3!
2 + 4!
PB! GLM!
BPBF
BPBF + VP1
BPBF + GAMYB
BPBF + GAMYB + VP1
0! 20! 40! 60! 80!
MBS!
Figure7
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure8.Transac,va,onassaysusing,aseffectors, theTFsHvVP1andBPBFand,as reporter,theHor2 genepromoterdriving theexpressionof theuidA gene (GUSac,vity).A, Schema,c
representa,on of the effector and the reporter constructs used in the analyses. B, Co-
bombardmentexperimentsonbarleydevelopingendospermsusingtheindicatedcombina,on
ofeffectorandreporterconstructs.Therela,veamountofreportertoeffectorplasmidsusedin
these assays corresponds to the 1:1 ra,o. Values are means ± SE of three independent
replicates.
P35S
I-ADHI
A Effectors
uidAPHor2 (- 560 bp)
Reporters
B
150
450
750
HvVP1 BPBF
1 2 3 4
Rel
GU
S A
ctiv
ity (%
) PHor2 :uidA
BPBF
--
-+
+-
++
Seed Maturation
Tnos
HvVP1 Tnos
Figure8
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on December 25, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 9.Proposedmodel of transcrip1onal regula1on of SSP (Hor2) and hydrolase (Amy6.4)genesinbarleyseedsmediatedbyHvVP1interac1ngwithGAMYB,DOF(BPBF,SAD),BLZ2andMR1(MYBR1)TFs,duringthematura1onandpost-germina1onphases.Thestarchyendospermandtheembryoplusaleuronelayerareconsideredseparately.Rela1vegeneexpressionlevelsareindicatedinthey-axis.ThedoPedver1callineindicatesthe1meofrootemergence.
Figure9
MATURATION GERMINATION & POST-GERM.
STAR
CHYEN
DOSPER
M
EMBR
YO&ALEURO
NELA
YER
HvVP1GAMYB
5 10 15 >20 16 24 48 72hoi
HvVP1
GAMYB
Hor22 Hor22x
Amy6.4x
PBF
SAD
BLZ2
MR1
Amy6.4
em
end
al
Parsed CitationsAlonso R, Oñate-Sánchez L, Weltmeier F, Ehlert A, Diaz I, Dietrich K, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Dröge-Laser W (2009) A pivotal role ofthe basic leucine zipper transcription factor bZIP53 in the regulation of Arabidopsis seed maturation gene expression based onheterodimerization and protein complex formation. Plant Cell 21:1747-61
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, Ren J, Li WW, Noble WS (2009) MEME SUITE: tools for motifsdiscovery and searching. Nucleic Acid Res 37: W202-W208.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bassel GW, Mullen RT, Bewley JD (2006) ABI3 expression ceases following, but not during, germination of tomato and Arabidopsisseeds. J Exp Bot 57: 1291-1297
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bateman A, Birney E, Cerruti L, Durbin R, Etwiller L, Eddy SR, Griffiths-Jones S, Howe KL, Marshall M, Sonnhammer EL (2002) ThePfam protein families database. Nucleic Acid Res 30: 276-280.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bewley JD (1997) Seed germination and dormancy. Plant Cell 9: 1055-1066Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Braybrook SA, Harada JJ (2008) LECs go crazy in embryo development. Trends Plant Sci 13: 624-630Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Casaretto J, Ho TH (2003) The transcription factors HvABI5 and HvVP1 are required for the abscisic acid induction of geneexpression in barley aleurone cells. Plant Cell 15: 271-284
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Diaz I, Martinez M, Isabel-LaMoneda I, Rubio-Somoza I, Carbonero P (2005) The DOF protein, SAD, interacts with GAMYB in plantnuclei and activates transcription of endosperm-specific genes during barley seed development. Plant J 42: 652-662
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Diaz I, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Abraham Z, Martínez M, Isabel-La Moneda I, Carbonero P (2002) The GAMYB protein from barleyinteracts with the DOF transcription factor BPBF and activates endosperm-specific genes during seed development. Plant J 29:453-464
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Druka A, Muehlbauer G, Druka I, Caldo R, Baumann U, Rostoks N, Schreiber A, Wise R, Close T, Kleinhofs A, Graner A, SchulmanA, Langridge P, Sato K, Hayes P, McNicol J, Marshall D, Waugh R (2006) An atlas of gene expression from seed to seed throughbarley development. Funct Integr Genomics 6: 202-211
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Finch-Savage WE, Leubner-Metzger G (2006) Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol 171: 501-523Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Finkelstein RR, Gampala SS, Rock CD (2002) Abscisic acid signaling in seeds and seedlings. Plant Cell 4 Suppl: S15-S45Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Finkelstein R, Reeves W, Ariizumi T, Steber C (2008) Molecular aspects of seed dormancy. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59: 387-415Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, Duvaud S, Wilkins MR, Appel RD, Bairoch A (2005) Protein identification and analysis tools onthe ExPASy server. In Walker JK ed, The proteomics protocols handbook. Humana Press, New York, pp 571-607
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
González-Calle V, Barrero-Sicilia C, Carbonero P, Iglesias-Fernández R (2015) Mannans and endo-ß-mannanases (MAN) inBrachypodium distachyon: expression profiling and possible role of the BdMAN genes during coleorhiza-limited seed germination.J Exp Bot: erv168
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
González-Calle V, Iglesias-Fernández R, Carbonero P, Barrero-Sicilia C (2014) The BdGAMYB protein from Brachypodiumdistachyon interacts with BdDOF24 and regulates transcription of the BdCathB gene upon seed germination. Planta 240: 539-552
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R, Neupane R, Hayes RD, Fazo J, Mitros T, Dirks W, Hellsten, U, Putnam N, Rokhsar DS (2012)Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D1178-1186
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Graeber K, Linkies A, Müller K, Wunchova A, Rott A, Leubner-Metzger G. 2010. Cross-species approaches to seed dormancy andgermination: conservation and biodiversity of ABA-regulated mechanisms and the Brassicaceae DOG1 genes. Plant Mol Biol. 73:67-87
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gubler F, Chandler PM, White RG, Llewellyn DJ, Jacobsen JV (2002) Gibberellin signaling in barley aleurone cells. Control of SLN1and GAMYB expression. Plant Physiol 129: 191-200
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gubler F, Kalla R, Roberts JK, Jacobsen JV (1995) Gibberellin-regulated expression of a myb gene in barley aleurone cells:evidence for Myb transactivation of a high-pI alpha-amylase gene promoter. Plant Cell 7: 1879-1891
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gubler F, Raventos D, Keys M, Watts R, Mundy J, Jacobsen JV (1999) Target genes and regulatory domains of the GAMYBtranscriptional activator in cereal aleurone. Plant J 17: 1-9
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gubler F, Millar AA, Jacobsen JV (2005) Dormancy release, ABA and pre-harvest sprouting. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8: 183-187Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hattori T, Vasil V, Rosenkrans L, Hannah LC, McCarty DR, Vasil IK (1992) The Viviparous-1 gene and abscisic acid activate the C1regulatory gene for anthocyanin biosynthesis during seed maturation in maize. Genes Dev 6: 609-618
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hill A, Nantel A, Rock CD, Quatrano RS (1996) A conserved domain of the Viviparous-1 gene product enhances the DNA bindingactivity of the bZIP protein EmBP-1 and other transcription factors. J Biol Chem 27:3366-74
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hobo T, Kowyama Y, Hattori T (1999) A bZIP factor, TRAB1, interacts with VP1 and mediates abscisic acid-induced transcription.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 96:15348-53
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hoecker U, Vasil IK, McCarty DR (1995) Integrated control of seed maturation and germination programs by activator andrepressor functions of Viviparous-1 of maize. Genes Dev 9: 2459-2469
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hoecker U, Vasil IK, McCarty DR (1999) Signaling from the embryo conditions Vp1-mediated repression of alpha-amylase genes inthe aleurone of developing maize seeds. Plant J 19: 371-377
Pubmed: Author and Title
CrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Holdsworth MJ, Bentsink L, Soppe WJJ (2008) Molecular networks regulating Arabidopsis seed maturation, after-ripening,dormancy and germination. New Phytol 179: 33-54
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Iglesias-Fernández R, Rodríguez-Gacio MC, Matilla AJ (2011a) Progress in research on afterripening. Seed Sci Res 21: 69-80Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Iglesias-Fernández R, Rodríguez-Gacio MC, Barrero-Sicilia C, Carbonero P, Matilla AJ (2011b) Three endo-ß-mannanase genesexpressed in the micropylar endosperm and in the radicle influence germination of Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. Planta 233: 25-36
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Iglesias-Fernández R, Rodríguez-Gacio MC, Barrero-Sicilia C, Carbonero P, Matilla AJ (2011c) Molecular analysis of endo-ß-mannanase genes upon seed imbibition suggests a cross-talk between radicle and micropylar endosperm during germination ofArabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signal Behav 6: 80-82
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Iglesias-Fernández R, Wozny D, Iriondo-de Hond M, Oñate-Sánchez L, Carbonero P, Barrero-Sicilia C (2014) The AtCathB3 gene,encoding a cathepsin B-like protease, is expressed during germination of Arabidopsis thaliana and transcriptionally repressed bythe basic leucine zipper protein GBF1. J Exp Bot 65: 2009-2021
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
International Barley Genome Sequencing Consortium, Mayer KF, Waugh R, Brown JW, Schulman A, Langridge P, Platzer M,Fincher GB, Muehlbauer GJ, Sato K, Close TJ, Wise RP, Stein N (2012) A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly ofthe barley genome. Nature 491: 711-716
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Isabel-LaMoneda I, Diaz I, Martinez M, Mena M, Carbonero P (2003) SAD: a new DOF protein from barley that activatestranscription of a cathepsin B-like thiol protease gene in the aleurone of germinating seeds. Plant J 33: 329-340
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jones HD, Peters NC, Holdsworth MJ (1997) Genotype and environment interact to control dormancy and differential expressionof the VIVIPAROUS 1 homologue in embryos of Avena fatua. Plant J 12: 911-920
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Koornneef M, Bentsink L, Hilhorst H (2002) Seed dormancy and germination. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5: 33-36Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lara P, Oñate-Sánchez L, Abraham Z, Ferrándiz C, Díaz I, Carbonero P, Vicente-Carbajosa J (2003) Synergistic activation of seedstorage protein gene expression in Arabidopsis by ABI3 and two bZIPs related to OPAQUE2. J Biol Chem 278: 21003-21011
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Marella HH, Quatrano RS (2007) The B2 domain of VIVIPAROUS1 is bi-functional and regulates nuclear localization andtransactivation. Planta 225: 863-872
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Matsumoto T, Tanaka T, Sakai H, Amano N, Kanamori H, Kurita K, Kikuta A, Kamiya K, Yamamoto M, Ikawa H, Fujii N, Hori K, Itoh T,Sato K. 2011. Comprehensive sequence analysis of 24,783 barley full-length cDNAs derived from 12 clone libraries. Plant Physiol.156: 20-28
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
McCarty DR, Carson CB, Stinard PS, Robertson DS (1989) Molecular analysis of viviparous-1: an abscisic acid-insensitive mutantof maize. Plant Cell 1: 523-532
Pubmed: Author and Title
CrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
McCarty DR, Hattori T, Carson CB, Vasil V, Lazar M, Vasil IK (1991) The Viviparous-1 developmental gene of maize encodes anovel transcriptional activator. Cell 66: 895-905
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mena M, Cejudo FJ, Isabel-Lamoneda I, Carbonero P (2002) A role for the DOF transcription factor BPBF in the regulation ofgibberellin-responsive genes in barley aleurone. Plant Physiol 130: 111-119
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mena M, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Schmidt RJ, Carbonero P (1998) An endosperm-specific DOF protein from barley, highly conservedin wheat, binds to and activates transcription from the prolamin-box of a native B-hordein promoter in barley endosperm. Plant J16: 53-62
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moreno-Risueño MA, Díaz I, Carrillo L, Fuentes R, Carbonero P (2007) The HvDOF19 transcription factor mediates the abscisicacid-dependent repression of hydrolase genes in germinating barley aleurone. Plant J 51: 352-365
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moreno-Risueño MA, González N, Díaz I, Parcy F, Carbonero P, Vicente-Carbajosa J (2008) FUSCA3 from barley unveils a commontranscriptional regulation of seed-specific genes between cereals and Arabidopsis. Plant J 53: 882-894
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nakamura S, Toyama T (2001) Isolation of a VP1 homologue from wheat and analysis of its expression in embryos of dormant andnon-dormant cultivars. J Exp Bot 52: 875-876
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nambara E, Hayama R, Tsuchiya Y, Nishimura M, Kawaide H, Kamiya Y, Naito S (2000) The role of ABI3 and FUS3 loci in Arabidopsisthaliana on phase transition from late embryo development to germination. Dev Biol 220: 412-423
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nonogaki H, Chen F, Bradford KJ (2007) Mechanisms and genes involved in germination sensu stricto. In Bradford K y Nonogaki Heds, Seed development, dormancy and germination. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 264-304
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Oñate L, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Lara P, Díaz I, Carbonero P (1999) Barley BLZ2, a seed-specific bZIP protein that interacts with BLZ1in vivo and activates transcription from the GCN4-like motif of B-hordein promoters in barley endosperm. J Biol Chem 274: 9175-9182
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Parcy F, Valon C, Raynal M, Gaubier-Comella P, Delseny M, Giraudat J (1994) Regulation of gene expression programs duringArabidopsis seed development: roles of the ABI3 locus and of endogenous abscisic acid. Plant Cell 6: 1567-1582
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Paz-Ares J, Wienand U, Peterson PA, Saedler H. (1986) Molecular cloning of the c locus of Zea mays: a locus regulating theanthocyanin pathway. EMBO J 5: 829-833
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pritchard SL, Charlton WL, Baker A, Graham IA (2002) Germination and storage reserve mobilization are regulated independentlyin Arabidopsis. Plant J. 31: 639-647
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Reidt W, Wohlfarth T, Ellerström M, Czihal A, Tewes A, Ezcurra I, Rask L, Bäumlein H (2000) Gene regulation during lateembryogenesis: the RY motif of maturation-specific gene promoters is a direct target of the FUS3 gene product. Plant J 21: 401-408
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Rodríguez MV, Barrero JM, Corbineau F, Gubler F, Benech-Arnold RL (2015) Dormancy in cereals (not too much, not so little):about the mechanisms behind this trait. Seed Sci Res 25: 99-119
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Rubio-Somoza I, Martinez M, Abraham Z, Diaz I, Carbonero P (2006a) Ternary complex formation between HvMYBS3 and otherfactors involved in transcriptional control in barley seeds. Plant J 47: 269-281
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Rubio-Somoza I, Martinez M, Diaz I, Carbonero P (2006b) HvMCB1, a R1MYB transcription factor from barley with antagonisticregulatory functions during seed development and germination. Plant J 45: 17-30
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sun TP, Gubler F. (2004) Molecular mechanism of gibberellin signaling in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55: 197-223.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Suzuki M, Kao CY, Cocciolone S, McCarty DR (2001) Maize VP1 complements Arabidopsis abi3 and confers a novel ABA/auxininteraction in roots. Plant J 28:409-418.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Swaminathan K, Peterson K, Jack T (2008) The plant B3 superfamily. Trends Plant Sci 13: 647-655Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. MolBiol Evol 30: 2725-2729
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Thompson J, Higgins D, Gibson T (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignmentthrough sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673-4680
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
To A, Valon C, Savino G, Guilleminot J, Devic M, Giraudat J, Parcy F (2006) A network of local and redundant gene regulationgoverns Arabidopsis seed maturation. Plant Cell 18: 1642-1651
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Vasil V, Marcotte WR Jr, Rosenkrans L, Cocciolone SM, Vasil IK, Quatrano RS, McCarty DR (1995) Overlap of Viviparous1 (VP1) andabscisic acid response elements in the Em promoter: G-box elements are sufficient but not necessary for VP1 transactivation.Plant Cell 7: 1511-1508
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Vicente-Carbajosa J, Carbonero P (2005) Seed maturation: developing an intrusive phase to accomplish a quiescent state. Int JDev Biol 49: 645-651
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Vicente-Carbajosa J, Moose SP, Parsons RL, Schmidt RJ (1997) A maize zinc-finger protein binds the prolamin box in zein genepromoters and interacts with the basic leucine zipper transcriptional activator Opaque2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 7685-7690
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Vicente-Carbajosa J, Oñate L, Lara P, Diaz I, Carbonero P (1998) Barley BLZ1: a bZIP transcriptional activator that interacts withendosperm-specific gene promoters. Plant J 13: 629-640
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yan D, Duermeyer L, Leoveanu C, Nambar E (2014) The functions of the endosperm during seed germination. Plant Cell Physiol55: 1521-1533
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zeng Y, Raimondi N, Kermode AR (2003) Role of an ABI3 homologue in dormancy maintenance of yellow-cedar seeds and in theactivation of storage protein and Em gene promoters. Plant Mol Biol 51: 39-49
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zeng Y, Zhao T, Kermode AR (2013) A conifer ABI3-interacting protein plays important roles during key transitions of the plant lifecycle. Plant Physiol 161: 179-195
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title