16
Earth and Planetao, Science Letters, 57 (1982) 47-62 47 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands [6] A combined O, Sr, Nd, and Pb isotopic and trace element study of crustal contamination in central Andean lavas, I. Local geochemical variations David E. James Carnegie Institution of Washington, Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, 5241 Broad Branch Rd., N. ~, Washington, DC 20015 (U.S.A.J Received April 14, 1981 Revised version received October 5, 1981 Systematic variations in O, Sr, Nd, and Pb isotopic ratios and in Sr, Nd, Pb, and Rb trace element abundances in central Andean andesitic lavas are analyzed in terms of combined crustal assimilation and fractional crystallization. The results of integrated isotopic model calculations show that observed local isotopic and trace element variations within the Arequipa and Barroso volcanic groups of southern Peru are best fit by a simple model involving shallow or intermediate depth crustal assimilation of Charcani gneiss (or an equivalent rock) accompanied by dominantly plagioclase fractional crystallization. A consequence of this result is that the Rb-Sr pseudoisochrons reported for the Arequipa and Barroso volcanics are wholly artifacts of the combined processes of assimilation and plagioclase fractionation, as are all of the Pb isotopic variations measured in the same lavas, already interpreted by Tilton and Barreiro [14] to be the result of crustal contamination. Isotopic and trace element compositions of the primary magmas for the Arequipa and Barroso volcanic series are obtained by correcting for assimilation and fractional crystallization. The starting magmas are characterized over the entire range of permissible primary compositions by high 87Sr/86Sr ratios, low 143Nd/la4Nd ratios, and high Sr concentrations relative to "normal" island arc andesites. These results appear to require prior contamination of the magmas, but not involving plagioclase fractionation. The uncertainty in Pb and O isotope ratios computed for possible primary magmatic compositions is sufficiently large, however, that it is not possible to preclude a subcrustal origin for at least some of the regional variation in Sr and Nd isotopic ratios. I. Introduction Insight into mountain building processes gained from plate tectonics has provided the stimulus for a decade or more of broad-ranging studies aimed at understanding the nature and evolution of the Andean orogenic belt. With increased understand- ing has come keener appreciation that the Andean system is segmented into provinces with funda- mentally different geologic, geochemical, and tectonic identities, and that results from one province are not necessarily applicable to others. There are three well-defined active Andean vol- canic provinces, generally termed northern, central, and southern, separated from one another by volcanically inactive zones. Although each of the three active Andean volcanic provinces has its own distinct geochemical "signature" [1], the central Andean volcanics are remarkable for their anoma- lous isotopic ratios and high abundances of large- ion-lithophile (LIL) elements. The origin of the unusual isotopic and trace element compositions has generated a wide-ranging controversy, at the heart of which is the issue of whether the compositional variations observed are due to crustal contamination or are due instead to compositional variations of the source (or are a combination of both). Interest in the nature of 0012-821 X/82/0000-0000/$02.75 ;c~ 1982 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company

A Combined O, Sr, Nd, And Pb Isotopic and Trace Element Study of Crustal Contamination in Central Andean Lavas, I. Local Geochemical Variations

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Earth and Planetao, Science Letters, 57 (1982) 47-62 47 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands

    [6]

    A combined O, Sr, Nd, and Pb isotopic and trace element study of crustal contamination in central Andean lavas,

    I. Local geochemical variations

    David E. James Carnegie Institution of Washington, Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, 5241 Broad Branch Rd., N. ~ , Washington, DC 20015

    (U.S.A.J

    Received April 14, 1981 Revised version received October 5, 1981

    Systematic variations in O, Sr, Nd, and Pb isotopic ratios and in Sr, Nd, Pb, and Rb trace element abundances in central Andean andesitic lavas are analyzed in terms of combined crustal assimilation and fractional crystallization. The results of integrated isotopic model calculations show that observed local isotopic and trace element variations within the Arequipa and Barroso volcanic groups of southern Peru are best fit by a simple model involving shallow or intermediate depth crustal assimilation of Charcani gneiss (or an equivalent rock) accompanied by dominantly plagioclase fractional crystallization. A consequence of this result is that the Rb-Sr pseudoisochrons reported for the Arequipa and Barroso volcanics are wholly artifacts of the combined processes of assimilation and plagioclase fractionation, as are all of the Pb isotopic variations measured in the same lavas, already interpreted by Tilton and Barreiro [14] to be the result of crustal contamination. Isotopic and trace element compositions of the primary magmas for the Arequipa and Barroso volcanic series are obtained by correcting for assimilation and fractional crystallization. The starting magmas are characterized over the entire range of permissible primary compositions by high 87Sr/86Sr ratios, low 143Nd/la4Nd ratios, and high Sr concentrations relative to "normal" island arc andesites. These results appear to require prior contamination of the magmas, but not involving plagioclase fractionation. The uncertainty in Pb and O isotope ratios computed for possible primary magmatic compositions is sufficiently large, however, that it is not possible to preclude a subcrustal origin for at least some of the regional variation in Sr and Nd isotopic ratios.

    I. Introduction

    Insight into mountain building processes gained from plate tectonics has provided the stimulus for a decade or more of broad-ranging studies aimed at understanding the nature and evolution of the Andean orogenic belt. With increased understand- ing has come keener appreciation that the Andean system is segmented into provinces with funda- mentally different geologic, geochemical, and tectonic identities, and that results from one province are not necessarily applicable to others. There are three well-defined active Andean vol- canic provinces, generally termed northern, central,

    and southern, separated from one another by volcanically inactive zones. Although each of the three active Andean volcanic provinces has its own distinct geochemical "signature" [1], the central Andean volcanics are remarkable for their anoma- lous isotopic ratios and high abundances of large- ion-lithophile (LIL) elements.

    The origin of the unusual isotopic and trace element compositions has generated a wide-ranging controversy, at the heart of which is the issue of whether the compositional variations observed are due to crustal contamination or are due instead to compositional variations of the source (or are a combination of both). Interest in the nature of

    0012-821 X/82/0000-0000/$02.75 ;c~ 1982 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company

  • 48

    Andean source material arises in part because of the potentially large volumes of continental material available for subduction, and the possible involvement of that material in subduction zone melting. It is also in the Andean type arcs, how- ever, where effects of crustal contamination (and possibly lithospheric mantle contamination) are likely to be most important. Before any rational conclusions can be drawn concerning the primary source of Andean magmas, these various effects must be isolated.

    The literature on central Andean volcanism in- cludes a multitude of explanations for the origin of the isotopic and trace element composition of the lavas: enriched continental lithosphere [2,3]; magma mixing [4]; melting of lower crust [5]; subduction zone melting of oceanic crust [6] and/or continentally derived sediments [7,8]; and, of course, crustal contamination of "normal" calc- alkaline magmas [9-14].

    With each addition of new data in the past few years has come increasing evidence for some form of crustal contamination. At issue has been the nature of that contamination. James et al. [2] showed that the high Sr abundances in the lavas of southern Peru precludes simple bulk contamina- tion of the kind commonly modeled in the litera- ture [15,16]. A similar conclusion was arrived at from work on Argentinian lavas [11]. Relatively low 6t80 values in the Peruvian lavas further limits the extent of crustal involvement [7,8]. In an earlier attempt to reconcile the available data, I proposed a petrogenetic model for magma genesis involving subducted continental sediments [8]. Subsequent measurements of Pb isotopes in these same lavas [14], however, indicate that subduction zone melting of continental sediments cannot pro- vide a general explanation for the geochemical variations observed.

    In the past two years, considerable effort has been devoted to developing a sensible model for crustal contamination [4,9,11-13]. The effort has been spurrred by a recognition that simple processes such as two-component mixing or frac- tional crystallization are not adequate to explain observed data, but that more physically realistic models are required. Of particular importance has been the development of a coupled assimilation-

    fractional crystallization model in which the heat required to melt assimilated wall rock is provided by the latent heat of crystallization of the magma [13,17,18]. It has, of course, been known since the time of Bowen that except for superheated mag- mas assimilation must be accompanied by crystal fractionation. The assimilation-fractional crys- tallization process seems not to have been em- phasized, however, because assimilation of most common rock types does not seriously alter major element chemistry or the liquid line of descent for a differentiated series, although the proportion of differentiates may vary [18]. In an important re- cent paper, Taylor [18] showed that while assimi- lation-fractional crystallization may not greatly affect the differentiation process the consequences for trace element and isotope geochemistry can be profound. In particular, the effects of combined assimilation-fractional crystallization on isotope ratios and trace element concentrations can differ markedly from those produced by either two com- ponent mixing or fractional crystallization alone [7,8].

    This paper is the first of two papers whose purpose it is to interpret the combined isotopic and trace element data for southern Peru lavas in terms of the assimilation-fractional crystallization model. This study utilizes a more complete data base than has been available for previous work on central Andean crustal contamination. Computer modeling is used to obtain model fits to the com- bined isotopic and trace element data.

    Included in this study are O, Sr, Nd, and Pb isotope ratios and Sr, Nd, Pb and Rb abundances measured in the same rock samples from the Arequipa and Barroso volcanic groups of southern Peru. The southern Peru volcanics are notable in that they exhibit systematic geochemical variations of two distinct types: a regional geochemical vari- ation between volcanic groups of southern Peru, and superimposed local geochemical variations within comagmatic volcanic series.

    The studies described in this paper are aimed at understanding the nature and origin of the local geochemical variations. A second paper will ex- amine the regional geochemical variations. The primary purpose of the present paper is to demon- strate that local geochemical variations within both

  • the Arequipa and Barroso volcanics can be mod- eled by a process of assimilation of Charcani gneiss (or a rock of equivalent composition) accompanied by dominantly plagioclase fractional crystallization at comparatively shallow depths, possibly in a magma chamber. Using this model, an attempt is made to define the compositional bounds of the primary magmas from which the Arequipa and Barroso volcanics were derived. Knowledge of the composition of these primary magmas is essential to characterize the intrinsic regional geochemical heterogeneity in southern Peru.

    2. Analytical data

    Isotopic and trace element data for the Are- quipa and Barroso volcanics of southern Peru are summarized in Table 1. Sample localities are shown in Fig. 1. The general geology and geochemistry of the southern Peru volcanics have been discussed elsewhere in some detail [2,8,19,20]. Geochemi- cally, the lavas can be grouped regionally into at least five distinct series [8], the most important of which are the Arequipa volcanics and the Barroso volcanics (see Fig. 1). The Arequipa volcanics are all younger than 1 m.y. and are essentially unal- tered, whereas the Barroso volcanics are early Pliocene to Pleistocene in age [21] and exhibit evidence of incipient low-temperature alteration. The slight alteration in the Barroso volcanics ap- pears to have little effect on radiogenic isotope ratios or trace element abundances, but it may be a cause of greater scatter of ~80 values.

    The radiogenic isotopic variations in the Are- quipa and Barroso volcanics are shown in Fig. 2. 180 versus radiogenic isotope ratios is shown in Fig. 3. While ~80 exhibits little correlation with radiogenic isotope ratios, there are distinct inter- correlations betwen radiogenic isotope ratios shown in Fig. 2. All of the interisotopic correla- tions exhibit what appear to be continuous trends which pass uniformly through both the Barroso and Arequipa volcanics, as though the two volcanic series evolved from a single parent magma inter- acting with a single contaminant. Isotopic versus trace element variations within the Arequipa and

    49

    Barroso volcanics show, however, that the two series could not have been derived from the same parent magma. This is shown in Fig. 4 where, for the purpose of illustration, 87Sr/86Sr ratios are plotted against trace element abundances and in Fig. 5 where 8VSr/S6Sr ratios are plotted versus Rb/Sr ratios. Despite this distinct contrast be- tween the two groups, the interisotopic corre- lations between them are remarkably consistent, and seem to suggest a prior stage of contamination in the lower Andean crust. The Pb-Pb data in particular seem to demand this. More on this question will be discussed in a subsequent paper.

    Aspects of the combined isotopic and trace element data important for modeling calculations include:

    (1) Sr is the only trace element studied which decreases in abundance with increasing 8VSr/86Sr. All other elements inlcuding Nd, Pb, Rb, and Ba increase with increasing SVSr/S6Sr. This confirms the dominant role of plagioclase in the magmatic evolution, as the plagioclase partition coefficient for Sr is 1.8 [22], but for the other elements is 0.1 [22-24].

    (2) Sr concentrations in the lavas are unusually high, relative both to other trace element abun- dances and to Sr abundances in "normal" island arc volcanics. The high Sr abundances are re- flected in high Sr/Rb, Sr /Nd and Sr/Pb ratios relative to many oceanic island arc lavas [25].

    (3) The more isotopically "evolved" Arequipa volcanics are characterized by lower average Rb, Nd, and Pb abundances and Rb/Sr ratios, and higher Sr abundances and Sr/Nd, Sr /Pb and K /Rb ratios than the more isotopically "primitive" Barroso volcanics.

    (4) The Rb-Sr data (Fig. 5) define "pseudoiso- chrons" yielding ages of 310 m.y. for the Barroso volcanics (correlation coeff ic ient- 0.91) and 440 m.y. for the Arequipa volcanics (correlation coeffi- cient = 0.82). Neither the Pb nor Nd-Sm data pro- duce similarly unambiguous pseudoisochrons.

    The coherence in the isotopic and trace element data for both the Arequipa and Barroso volcanics provides a necessary condition for modeling of the processes which gave rise to the observed hetero- geneity. It bears emphasizing that the kind of analysis presented here requires not only a corn-

  • TA

    BLE

    I

    An

    aly

    tica

    l da

    ta.

    Sa

    mp

    le

    6 ~

    80 a

    87Sr/

    S6Sr b

    14

    3N

    d/t

    44

    Nd

    c

    20

    4p

    b/2

    06

    pb

    d

    20

    7p

    b/2

    06

    pb

    a

    Sr e

    N

    d e

    P

    b d

    R

    b e

    No

    . (%

    0)

    (pp

    m)

    (pp

    m)

    (pp

    m)

    (pp

    m)

    A re

    quip

    a volc

    anic

    s PE

    24

    7.2

    7

    0.7

    0797

    0.5

    1217

    0.0

    5620

    0.8

    780

    699.0

    25.0

    12.5

    PE25

    7.4

    2

    0.7

    0765

    657.0

    PE26

    7.2

    8

    0.7

    0707

    0.5

    1221

    0.0

    5550

    0.8

    672

    848.0

    26.0

    12.2

    PE

    27

    7

    .41

    0.7

    0718

    848.0

    PE

    28

    7

    .25

    0.7

    0719

    842.0

    PE

    29

    7.4

    2

    0.7

    07

    11

    856.0

    PE

    30

    7.1

    2

    0.7

    0709

    849.0

    PE

    46

    7

    .01

    0

    .70

    75

    1

    804.0

    33.3

    PE

    47

    6.9

    0

    0.7

    0760

    0.5

    1229

    0.0

    5604

    0.8

    749

    785.0

    32.0

    11.4

    PE

    48

    6.8

    3

    0.7

    0762

    816.0

    PE

    49

    7.0

    5

    0.7

    0762

    0.5

    1220

    0.0

    5604

    0.8

    748

    804.0

    30.0

    16.4

    PE

    79

    7

    .05

    0.7

    0749

    780.0

    PE

    80

    7.0

    8

    0.7

    0742

    753.0

    PE81

    6.8

    7

    0.7

    0673

    0.5

    1227

    799.0

    24.0

    PE

    82

    7.1

    8

    0.7

    0733

    0.5

    1222

    0.0

    5561

    0.8

    670

    763.0

    13.4

    PE83

    6.9

    8

    0.7

    0737

    0.0

    5572

    0.8

    694

    730.0

    16.2

    Barr

    oso

    volc

    anic

    s PE128

    7.9

    2

    0.7

    0544

    0.5

    1235

    675.0

    26.0

    PE

    12

    9

    7.1

    9

    0.7

    0647

    0.5

    1232

    0.0

    5471

    0.8

    534

    614.0

    0.0

    22.1

    P

    EI3

    0

    7.4

    2

    0.7

    05

    51

    0.5

    1236

    0.0

    5467

    0.8

    523

    653.0

    25.6

    10.7

    P

    EI3

    1

    7.1

    8

    0.7

    0564

    0.5

    1224

    0.0

    5481

    0.8

    541

    609.0

    30.0

    15.7

    PE132

    7.2

    7

    0.7

    0644

    579.0

    PE

    14

    4

    6.9

    0

    0.7

    0644

    0.5

    1242

    0.0

    5508

    0.8

    581

    590.0

    25.7

    15.9

    P

    EI4

    5

    6.9

    9

    0.7

    0656

    0.5

    1227

    0.0

    5505

    0.8

    581

    592.0

    16.5

    57.0

    61.0

    4

    6.0

    4

    6.0

    4

    6.0

    4

    7.0

    4

    7.0

    71.0

    67.0

    69.0

    69.0

    47.0

    50.0

    39.0

    51.0

    63.0

    48

    .0

    79.0

    53.0

    78.0

    97.0

    84.0

    86.0

    a (~

    lS O

    . n

    orm

    ali

    zed

    to

    NB

    S N

    o. 28 q

    ua

    rtz st

    an

    da

    rd=

    9.5

    5%

    0.

    Re

    sult

    s fro

    m Ja

    me

    s [8

    ].

    b S

    TSr/

    S6Sr n

    orm

    ali

    zed

    to

    E&

    A s

    tan

    da

    rd

    SrC

    O 3 =

    0.7

    08

    00

    a

    nd

    86

    Sr/

    /SS

    Sr-

    0.1

    19

    4.

    20

    un

    ce

    rta

    inty

    ,'~;'1 0.704 I

    500 600 700 800 Sr (ppm)

    i i

    0.-? 12 0.716 87S J86Sr

    9.0

    ~ 8.0 o

    oo 7.0

    6 0 .5114 0.5'118

    12.6 I0,0 '..:,

    ,,o.,.~6. . , \ '.ii;..

    0,5124 AR2 % "~i""

    ~""'I " ' - -1 , , .... ~:~:AR2 - o , ,~ ~,0,po~,~o ,; "-..:.:::::...,::~.:.i~.o, e .....

    ARI I 0.5122 0.5126

    143Nd/144Nd

    9.0

    ~ 8.0 o

    OO

    7.0

    6.0 0.5114 0.5118

    I0.0

    ::;.. 0

    i " _ -,~,~,o j \.":::o

    0.5124 7 " ~ .~...

    0,,2~,, ~0 2, ,o '~ ....... ' : ; "~ Nd (ppm) BA2 BA

    h i

    0~,~ ' 0.5.26 143Nd/144Nd

    9.0

    2 8.0 o

    co 7 .0

    6.0

    ~0.1~8. ', . ,,,,..' - , /ARZ .~;-~:--~r- /

    :::L' 1 j / 12,6 ?ARI / 0.821 I i m ..:..,F

    5 IO t5 20 / '3" I0.0 Pb (ppm) .."" ." /J.

    ..-II .-' / . ' - I I

    ..... ~_~" . i 7 ........ L , - -1~ ........ _..s

    ~ ~:';:';"'+" ~":'" ............ ,&'h2 ......... ~,RI i i / i

    0.84 0.86 0 .88 2o7pb/2O6pb

    I0.0

    9.0

    o 8.0 oO 60

    7.0 (

    6.0

    1 i

    0.86 ' ' . . - 'S - - "

    ~o .8 , . / ? , , . / 083 ~10 15 20 25

    Pb (ppm}

    12.6 - , I I0.0

    . / /

    0 "

  • 59

    0.710 I I I I I

    ,,o 0 .708 Go

    ~ 0.706

    O. 704 0

    zo

    'o Anl ~ ~ o~ BAt

    0 60 80 I O0

    AR2 ~

    BA2 I I 1 I I

    0 20 40 60 80 I00

    Rb (ppm)

    Fig. I 1. Assimilation-fractional crystallization mixing curves for S7Sr/S6Sr versus Rb. Weight proportion of assimilated material to weight of starting magma shown as tics on mixing lines. Some data points not included in Table 1. Symbols as in Fig. 7. End-member model compositions given in Table 2.

    and Nd-Pb isotopic correlations shown in Fig. 9. The most definitive relationships are shown by the Arequipa volcanics where the Sr-Nd data form a cluster trending off to the right of the mantle array. For the Barroso volcanics, the data lie within or below the extension of the mantle array. Plots of Nd versus Pb isotope ratios exhibit considerable scatter and no clear mixing trend can be observed. Within the limits of scatter, however, computed mixing curves are consistent with the observed data.

    8180 values (measured in plagioclase separates) versus radiogenic isotope ratios are shown in Fig. 10. In terms of predicted mixing behavior, the lack of correlation between 8180 and radiogenic iso- tope ratios in the volcanics is disappointing but not surprising. A major cause of scatter in the oxygen data is almost certainly the large variation in 8'80 of Peruvian gneisses (7.5 to 12.6%o, D.E. James, unpublished data) which is uncorrelated with radiogenic isotopic ratios in those rocks. The effect of the scatter in 8180 of the contaminant is shown in Fig. 10, where dashed (or dash-dot) mixing lines are indicated for ~180 c = 10.0%o and dotted mixing lines for 818Oc of 7.5 and 12.6%o. Most of the analytical data for the Arequipa and Barroso volcanics lie within this range of values. The oxygen isotopic data demand at least some degree of crustal contamination. Beyond that, however, 8180 values in the volcanics seem to reflect primarily a lack of correlation between 8 '80 and radiogenic isotope ratios in the assimi- lated material. This lack of correlation effectively

    precludes the use of oxygen isotopes for quantita- tive modeling, although the oxygen isotope data are not inconsistent with the model proposed here.

    The variations in elemental abundances versus radiogenic isotopic ratios are shown on insets in the plots in Fig. 10 and also in Fig. 11. The observed correlations between isotope ratios and element concentrations confirm that the dominant cumulate phase must be plagioclase, with Ksr > 1.0 and KNd.eb,Rb --~ 0.1. In general, the scatter in trace element concentrations appears to reflect varying ratios of assimilation to fractional crystallization. In the simplified model considered here, that ratio is taken to be constant and, especially for the more evolved end-members of the volcanic series, may be too low.

    5. Discussion and conclusions

    While there is considerable latitude and uncer- tainty in the kind of modeling done here, the results presented in this paper indicate that the Arequipa and Barroso volcanic series could well have evolved by some process of assimilation and fractional crystallization. The local isotopic and trace element variations observed can be produced by assimilation of Precambrian crustal material accompanied by dominantly plagioclase fractiona- tion. Insofar as this model is correct, the composi- tion of primary magmas for the two volcanic series lie within the range of compositions given in Table 2. The following conclusions can be drawn

  • 60

    from this study: (1) The Rb-Sr pseudoisochrons reported by

    James et al. [2] for the Arequipa and Barroso volcanics are entirely an artifact of the assimila- tion-fractional crystallization process modeled here. Consequently, the pseudoisochrons have no direct age significance and no relation to the na- ture of the Andean mantle or to subduction zone melting.

    (2) The primary magmas for the Arequipa and Barroso volcanics had 87Sr//86Sr ratios of at least 0.7062 and 0.7050, respectively, and 143Nd/la4Nd ratios of probably no more than about 0.51255. Primary compositions with 87Sr/86Sr ratios near 0.703 as suggested by Harmon et al. [12] do not and cannot satisfy the southern Peru data. Com- puted primary magma compositions ar.e well con- strained by the observed isotopic correlations and are clearly outside the range of compositions for "normal" island arc magmas.

    (3) The Sr and Nd isotopic composition of the primary magmas and their high Sr concentrations, together with the interisotopic colinearity of the Arequipa and Barroso series suggests prior con- tamination of the magmas by Precambrian material similar to that exposed at the surface in southern Peru. That contamination would have had to have taken place in the lower Andean crust (> 50 km) where plagioclase is unstable. The results are suffi- ciently ambiguous, however, that we cannot rule out a subcrustal origin for some of the anomalous Sr and Nd isotopic compositions.

    (4) Computed primary magma compositions are characterized by very high Sr concentrations which are not reflected in uniformly high concentrations of the other LIL elements studied here. As a result, Sr/Nd ratios are anomalously high (34-80) rela- tive to "normal" mantle or chondritic ratios of

    18 [32], and Rb/Sr ratios are comparatively low, especially for the Arequipa volcanics, relative to oceanic calc-alkaline volcanics [33]. Sr/Pb ratios do not appear to be excessively high compared to those measured in Marianas lavas [30], but they are on the high side of ratios measured for other island arc lavas [25].

    Although there is no a priori reason for choos- ing the more "evolved" primary magma composi- tions (AR2 and BA2) over the more "primitive"

    compositions (AR1 and BA1), there are several reasons (albeit none of them compelling) for pre- ferring the evolved compositions. Firstly, they do not require as much magmatic differentiation be- fore the first lavas are extruded; if the more primi- tive compositions (AR1 and BA1) represented the primary magma, it is surprising that no lavas close to that composition are found. Secondly, the rela- tively small negative Eu anomalies in the more isotopically primitive rocks of each volcanic series ([26], W. Leeman, personal communication) seem to preclude large degrees of plagioclase removal. Finally, models AR2 and BA2 require Pb con- centrations of about 15 ppm in the contaminant, close to the average concentration observed in the Charcani gneiss. If AR2 and BA2 are appropriate primary magma compositions for the Arequipa and Barroso volcanics respectively, then it appears that the primary magmas reflect a prior crustal overprint. The nature and origin of that overprint will be examined in a subsequent paper [34].

    Whatever the precise composition of the primary mgmas, the dominant role of plagioclase fractiona- tion in the evolution of both volcanic series effec- tively precludes lower crustal (>50 km) con- tamination as a primary mechanism for producing the local geochemical variations. An important conclusion arising from the results presented here is that the central Andean geochemical data can be modeled by straightforward and physically plausible processes known to occur during volcanism--that is, assimilation of wall rock and fractional crystallization, probably at relatively shallow depths in a magma chamber. In an at- tempt to explain the Sr isotopic and Sr concentra- tion data in these same volcanics, Briqueu and Lancelot [9] suggested a process of selective con- tamination through "collector zones of magma" in the crust. Their suggestion has been reiterated more recently by Francis et al. [10]. The magma collector zones are presumed to correspond to low- velocity zones in the Andean crust as postulated by Ocola and Meyer [35]. As there has been con- siderable confusion concerning the significance of these "low-velocity zones" it seems appropriate to emphasize that it has never been demonstrated that any significant low-velocity zones exist in the Andean crust, despite the published interpreta-

  • tions. The confusion arises because all Andean seismic profiles for which low velocity zones have been inferred are unreversed (i.e., there is a shot point at only one end of the observing line of seismic stations). For such unreversed profiles, lateral changes in geologic structure due to fault offsets or sharp changes in lithology can produce seismic effects virtually indistinguishable from those produced by low-velocity zones. When un- reversed travel-time data are interpreted in terms of laterally homogeneous (i.e., onion skin) earth structure, then travel-time anomalies produced by lateral changes in structure are by necessity incor- porated in (spurious) velocity-depth models which may contain equally spurious crustal low- velocity zones. For the central Andes, the structures so obtained do not agree with surface-wave data or with much of the refraction data [36]. There is, in short, no seismological basis for postulating zones of partial melting in the Andean crust and hence there is no basis for attributing geochemical effects to them. Results presented here show that such models are not required to explain the data.

    Finally, the results presented in this paper per- mit some definite limits to be placed on the com- positions of possible primary magmas for the Arequipa and Barroso volcanic series. These com- positional limits serve as an essential basis for characterizing the regional geochemical hetero- geneity in the southern Peru lavas. In terms of radiogenic isotope ratios, the Barroso volcanics exhibit consistently a more "primitive" character than do the Arequipa volcanics. Yet in terms of trace element abundances and abundance ratios, the Barroso volcanics appear to be considerably more "continental" in character than the Arequipa volcanics, with higher Nd, Pb, and Rb concentra- tions, lower Sr concentrations, and, possibly, slightly higher 8180 values. It remains to reconcile these contradictory characteristics of the regional geochemical variations with self-consistent models of petrogenesis and magmatic evolution of the central Andean lavas.

    Acknowledgements

    Field studies for this work were supported by the National Science Foundation and H.O. Wood

    61

    fund and were carried out in collaboration with Servicio Geologico del Peru. I am indebted to Dr. Mark Feigenson for making some of the Sr isotope and trace element analyses and to D. Diez de Medina for point counts of the Arequipa and Barroso volcanics. Oxygen isotope analysis were done on a mass spectrometer maintained by Dr. T. Hoering of the Geophysical Laboratory of the Carnegie Institution.

    References

    1 R.S. Thorpe and P.W. Francis, Variations in Andean ande- site compositions and their petrogenetic significance, Tectonophysics 57 (1979) 53.

    2 D.E. James, C. Brooks and A. Cuyubamba, Andean Ceno- zoic volcanisms: magma genesis in the light of strontium isotopic composition and trace element geochemistry, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 87 (1976) 592.

    3 C.J. Hawkesworth, M.J. Norry, J.C. Roddick, P.E. Baker, P.W. Francis and R.S. Thorpe, 143Nd/144Nd, S7Sr/S6Sr and incompatible element variations in calc-alkaline ande- sites and plateau lavas from South America, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 42 (1979) 45.

    4 J. Klerkx, S. Deutsch, H. Pichler and W. Zeil, Strontium isotopic composition and trace element data bearing on the origin of Cenozoic volcanic rocks of the central and south- ern Andes, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2 (1977) 49.

    5 H. Pichler and W. Zeil, Chilean "andesites" crustal or mantle derivation?, in: Proceedings of International Upper Mantle Project, Conf. on Solid Earth Problems, Vol. 2, Buenos Aires (1972) 361.

    6 R.S. Thorpe, P.J. Potts and P.W. Francis, Rare earth data and petrogenesis of andesite from the north Chilean Andes, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 54 (1976) 65.

    7 D.E James, Origin of high 8Sr/86Sr ratios in central Andean calc-alkaline lavas, in: Short Papers of the Fourth Interna- tional Conference on Geochronology, Cosmochronology, and Isotope Geology, Aspen, Colorado, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-file Rep. 78-701 (1978) 199.

    8 D.E. James, Role of subducted continental material in the genesis of calc-alkaline volcanics of the central Andes, Geol. Soc. Am, Nazca Plate Mem. (in press).

    9 L. Briqueu and J.R. Lancelot, Rb-Sr systematics and crustal contamination models for calc-alkaline igneous rocks, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 43 (1979) 385.

    10 P.W. Francis, S. Moorbath and R.S. Thorpe, Strontium isotope data for recent andesites in Ecuador and North Chile, Earth Planet. Sci. lett. 37 (1977) 197.

    11 P.W. Francis, R.S. Thorpe, S. Moorbath, G.A. Kretzschmar and M. Hammill, Strontium isotope evidence for crustal contamination of calc-alkaline volcanic: rocks from Cerro Galan, northwest Argentina, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 48 (1980) 257.

    12 R.S. Harmon, R.S. Thorpe and P.W. Francis, Petrogenesis

  • 62

    of Andean andesites from combined O-Sr isotope relation- ships, Nature 290 (1981) 396.

    13 D.J. DePaolo, Trace element and isotopic effects of com- bined wallrock assimilation and fractional crystallization, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 53 (1981) 189.

    14 G.R. Tilton and B.A. Barreiro, Origin of lead in Andean calc-alkaline lavas, southern Peru, Science 210 (1980) 1245.

    15 A. Ewart and J.J. Stipp, Petrogenesis of the volcanic rocks of the Central North Island, New Zealand, as indicated by a study of 87Sr/86Sr ratios, and Sr, Rb, K, U, and Th abundances, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 32 (1968) 699.

    16 P. Pushkar, Strontium isotopic ratios in volcanic rocks of three island arc areas, J. Geophys. Res. 73 (1968) 2701.

    17 D.E. James, The combined use of oxygen and radiogenic isotopes as indicators of crustal contamination, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 9 (1981) 311.

    18 H.P. Taylor Jr., The effects of assimilation of country rocks by magmas on lSO/160 and STSr/S6Sr systematics in ig- neous rocks, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 47 (1980) 243.

    19 D.E. James, Plate tectonic model for the evolution of the central Andes, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 82 (197.1) 3325.

    20 C. Lefevre, Les caracteres magmatiques du volcanisme plio- quaternaire des Andes le Sud de Perou, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 41 (1973) 259.

    21 R.M. Tosdal, E. Farrar and A.H. Clark, K-Ar geochronol- ogy of the late Cenozoic volcanic rocks of the Cordillera Occidental, southernmost Peru, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. l0 (1981) 157.

    22 J.G. Arth, Behavior of trace elements during magmatic processes--a summary of theoretical models and their ap- plications, J. Res. U.S. Geol. Surv. 4 (1976) 41.

    23 G.N. Hanson, Rare earth elements in petrogenetic studies of igneous systems, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 8 (1980) 371.

    24 W.P. Leeman, Partitioning of Pb between volcanic glass and coexisting sanidine and plagioclase feldspars, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 43 (1979) 171.

    25 D.J. Whitford, Geochemistry and petrology of volcanic rocks from the Sunda arc, Indonesia, Ph.D. Dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T. (1975)

    26 D.J. Whitford, Rare earth element abundances in late- Cenozoic lavas from the Peruvian Andes: a preliminary report, Carnegie Inst. Washington Yearb. 76 (1977) 840.

    27 G.W. Lugmair and R.W. Carlson, The Sm-Nd history of KREEP, Proc. 9th Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. (1978) 689.

    28 D.E. James and C. Brooks, Preliminary Rb/Sr data on the minimum age of the central Andean Precambrian basement complex, Carnegie Inst. Washinton Yearb. 75 (1976) 213.

    29 R.M. Shackleton, A.C. Ries, M.P. Coward and P.R. Cob- bold, Structure, metamorphism and geochronology of the Arequipa Massif of coastal Peru, J. Geol. Soc. London 136 (1979) 195.

    30 A. Meijer, Pb and Sr isotopic data bearing on the origin of volcanic rocks from the Mariana Island arc system, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 87 (1976) 1358.

    31 S.E. Church and G.R. Tilton, Lead and strontium isotopic studies in the Cascade Mountains: bearing on andesite genesis, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 84 (1973) 431.

    32 D.J. DePaolo and R.W. Johnson, Magma genesis in the New Britain island-arc: constraints from Nd and Sr iso- topes and trace element patterns, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 70 (I 979) 367.

    33 P. Jakes and A.J.R. White, Major and trace element abun- dances in volcanic rocks of orogenic areas, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 83 (1972) 29.

    34 D.E. James, A combined O, Sr, Nd, and Pb isotope and trace element study of crustal contamination in central Andean lavas, II. Regional geochemical variations (in preparation).

    35 L.C. Ocola and R.P. Meyer, Crustal low-velocity zones under the Peru-Bolivia altiplano, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 30 (1972) 199.

    36 D.E. James, Andean crustal and upper mantle structure, J. Geophys. Res. 76 (1971) 3246.

    37 L.C. Ocola, L.T. Aldrich, D.E. James, I.S. Sacks and J. Ramirez, Crustal structure in the eastern valley of southern Colombia and its extension into northern Ecuador, in: I.U.G.G., Int. Assoc. Seismol. Phys. Earth Inter., C.R. 18, Part 1 (1973) 248.

    38 L.C. Ocola, L.T. Aldrich, J.F. Gettrust, R.P. Meyer and J.E. Ramirez, Project Narino I: crustal structure under southern Colombian-northern Ecuador Andes from seismic refrac- tion data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am 65 (1975) 1681.