5 Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast ...ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication Reports/Expert Group Report/acom/2016/WGEF/07 WGEF Report...WGEF (Vinnichenko and Fomin, 2009

136 | ICES WGEF REPORT 2016

5 Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic

(ICES Subareas 4–14)

5.1 Stock distributions

This section includes information about deep-water elasmobranch species other than

Portuguese dogfish and leafscale gulper shark (see Section 3), kitefin shark (see Section

4) and Greenland shark (see Section 24). Limited information exists on the majority of

the deep-water elasmobranchs considered here, and the stock units for these species

are unknown.

The species and generic landing categories for which landing data are presented are:

gulper shark Centrophorus granulosus, birdbeak dogfish Deania calcea, longnose velvet

dogfish Centroscymnus crepidater, black dogfish Centroscyllium fabricii, velvet belly

Etmopterus spinax, lantern sharks nei Etmopterus spp., and ‘aiguillat noir’ (which may

include C. fabricii, C. crepidater and Etmopterus spp.).

Fourteen species of skate (Rajidae) are known from deep water in NE Atlantic: Arctic

skate Amblyraja hyperborea, Jensen's skate Amblyraja jenseni, Krefft's skate Malacoraja

kreffti, roughskin skate Malacoraja spinacidermis, deep-water skate Rajella bathyphila, pal-

lid skate Bathyraja pallida, Richardson's skate Bathyraja richardsoni, Bigelow's skate Ra-

jella bigelowi, round skate Rajella fyllae, Mid-Atlantic skate Rajella kukujevi, spinytail

skate Bathyraja spinicauda, sailray Rajella lintea, Norwegian skate Dipturus nidarosiensis,

blue pygmy skate Neoraja caerulea and Iberian pygmy skate Neoraja iberica.

Species such as Dipturus batis-complex and Leucoraja fullonica may also be found in

deep water, but their main areas of distribution are in shallower waters and they are

not considered in this section. One species of electric ray (Torpedo nobiliana) may also

occur in the deep water of this area.

Eight species of rabbitfish (Chondichthyes; Holocephali), including members of the

genera Chimaera, Hariotta and Rhinochimaera are a bycatch of some deep-water fisheries

and are sometimes marketed. The current zero-TACs for deep-water sharks, whose

livers were used to extract squalene, may have led to the increased retention of rabbit-

fish, particularly common chimaera Chimaera monstrosa in Norway (114 t in 2012, 177 t

in 2013) to produce “ratfish oil”. Catches of Chimaeridae are included in the report of

the ICES Working Group on Deep-water Fisheries Resources (WGDEEP).

5.2 The fishery

5.2.1 History of the fishery

Most catches of other deep-water shark and skate species are taken in mixed trawl,

longline and gillnet fisheries together with Portuguese dogfish, leafscale gulper shark

and deep-water teleosts.

5.2.2 The fishery in 2015

Since 2010, EU TACs for deep-water sharks have been set at zero (see Section 5.2.4).

Consequently, reported landings of most of the species covered in this chapter in 2015

were very low or zero. As most of these species are taken as bycatch in mixed fisheries,

it is likely that discarding has increased.

ICES WGEF REPORT 2016 | 137

5.2.3 ICES advice applicable

No species-specific advice is given for the shark and skate species considered here.

The ICES Advice for 2013 also included an “Opinion on modification to the list of deep-sea

sharks” (ICES Advice 2013, Book 11, Section 11.2.2.1).

5.2.4 Management applicable

Prior to 2010 in EC waters, a combined TAC was set for a group of deep-water sharks.

These include Portuguese dogfish Centroscymnus coelolepis, leafscale gulper shark Cen-

trophorus squamosus, birdbeak dogfish Deania calcea, kitefin shark Dalatias licha, greater

lanternshark Etmopterus princeps, velvet belly Etmopterus spinax, black dogfish Cen-

troscyllium fabricii, gulper shark Centrophorus granulosus, blackmouth catshark Galeus

melastomus, mouse catshark Galeus murinus, longnose velvet dogfish Centroscymnus

crepidater, frilled shark Chlamydoselachus anguineus, bluntnose six-gill shark Hexanchus

griseus, sailfin roughshark Oxynotus paradoxus, Greenland shark Somniosus microcepha-

lus, knifetooth dogfish Scymnodon ringens and deep-water catsharks Apristurus spp. In

Subarea 12, rough longnose dogfish Deania histricosa and arrowhead dogfish Deania

profundorum are also included on the list.

In 2010, TACs in all areas were reduced to zero with an allowance for bycatch of 10%

of 2009 TACs. For 2011, the bycatch allowance was reduced to 3% of 2009 TACs and in

2012 no allowance for bycatch was permitted. This remained the status quo in 2013 and

2014. In 2014, the list of sharks was updated to include all Centrophorus species and

blackmouth catshark was removed, following comments from ICES (See Section 5.2.3).

The zero-TAC for deep-water sharks was also fixed for 2015 and 2016.

Deep-water skates are included in EU TACs for “Skates and Rays Rajidae”. In EU wa-

ters of Divisions 6.a-b, 7a-c and 7e-k, Norwegian skate Dipturus nidarosiensis is one of

a group of species which may not be retained on board and must be promptly released

unharmed to the extent practicable.

5.3 Catch data

5.3.1 Landings

Landings in 2015 were very low due to the zero TAC in force for deep-water sharks

(Tables 5.1–5,9).

Gulper shark Centrophorus granulosus

Almost all landings of gulper shark (Tables 5.1 and 5.9) have been from the Portuguese

longline fishery in Subarea 9. Until 2008, annual landings from this fishery were

around 100 t however, in 2009, Portuguese landings reduced to 2 t. Other countries

reported very small landings from Subareas 6 and 7 since 2002. Reported landings of

this species by UK vessels in Subareas 6 and 7 are considered to be misidentified and

these data are included in the Working Group estimates of “siki sharks”.

Birdbeak dogfish Deania calcea

Reported landings of birdbeak dogfish are presented in Tables 5.2 and 5.9. It is likely

that landings reported as this species include other species in the same genus, particu-

larly in Portuguese landings from Subarea 10 (Pinho, 2010 WD). Misidentification

problems were detected in mainland Portuguese landing ports with two different spe-

cies of Deania being observed in catches: D. calcea and D. profundorum.


Five European countries have reported landings from Subareas 7 and 9 of birdbeak

dogfish: Ireland, UK (England and Wales), UK (Scotland), Spain and Portugal. In 2005,

the total reported landings for all subareas reached 194 t; however this declined to 66 t

in 2008 and zero by 2009.

Catches of this species by Russian deep-water longline fisheries in the Faroese Fishing

Zone and other Northeastern Atlantic areas were reported in working documents to

WGEF (Vinnichenko and Fomin, 2009 WD; Vinnichenko et al., 2010 WD). However

landings data from this fishery were not made available to the working group since.

Longnose velvet dogfish Centroscymnus crepidater

Reported landings of longnose velvet dogfish are presented in Tables 5.3 and 5.9. It is

likely that some landings of this species are also included in data for “siki sharks” (see

Section 3) and in other mixed categories.

European countries that have reported landings from Subareas 6–9 are: UK (England

and Wales), UK (Scotland), France, Spain and Portugal. Highest landings (400 t) were

recorded in 2005 and were principally derived from the UK registered deep-water gill-

net fleet. Reported landings have since declined to zero, probably as a result of the ban

on deep-water gillnet fishing and reduced EU TACs for deep-water sharks.

Black dogfish Centroscyllium fabricii

Reported landings of black dogfish are presented in Tables 5.4 and 5.9. Landings of this

species may also be included in the grouped category “Aiguillat noir” and other mixed

categories, including siki sharks.

Four European countries have reported landings, from Divisions 4.a, 5.b and Subareas

7 and 12: UK, Iceland, France and Spain.

France reported the majority of the landings of black dogfish in the ICES area, starting

to report landings in 1999. French annual landings peaked at about 400 t in 2001 and

have since declined. These landings are mainly from Division 5.b and Subarea 6. Ice-

land reported few landings, all from Division 5.a. The largest annual landings reported

by Spain came from Subarea 12 in 2000 (85 t) and 2001 (91 t), but recent data are lacking.

Since 2009, only Iceland reported catches of black dogfish, mainly from Subarea 5, but

always in small amounts (1 t in 2013).

Velvet belly Etmopterus spinax

Reported landings of velvet belly are presented in Tables 5.5 and 5.9. Five countries

have reported landings of velvet belly, from Subareas 2–4, 6–8 and 10: Denmark, Nor-

way, UK (England and Wales), UK (Scotland) and Spain. Greatest landings are from

Denmark. Landings began in 1993, peaked in 1998 at 359 t and have since declined. In

recent years catches have mostly been reported by Norway, with a maximum of 19 t in

2013.

Catches of this species by Russian deep-water longline fisheries in the Faroese Fishing

Zone and other Northeastern Atlantic areas were reported in working documents to

WGEF (Vinnichenko and Fomin, 2009 WD; Vinnichenko et al., 2010 WD). However

landing data from this fishery were not made available to the working group since.


Lantern sharks nei Etmopterus spp.

Reported landings of lantern sharks nei are presented in Tables 5.6 and 5.9. Four Euro-

pean countries have reported landings from Subareas 4–7 and 9: France, UK (Scotland),

Spain and Portugal.

Portuguese landings mainly referred to Etmopterus spinax and Etmopterus pusillus, how-

ever only a very small proportion of the catches of these species is retained.

Reported French landings began in 1994, peaked at nearly 3000 t in 1996 then declined

by 1999. There is doubt as to whether these landings are actually of this genus. French

landings of Etmopterus princeps have been included in ‘siki’ sharks.

Spanish landings began in 2000, peaked at over 300 t in 2001. Spanish landings data

have not been available since 2003.

Few landings data have been reported since 2003.

“Aiguillat noir”

This is a generic category only used by France (Tables 5.7 and 5.9) to record landings

on small, deep-water squaliform sharks, mainly black dogfish Centroscyllium fabricii

with smaller quantities of longnose velvet dogfish and lantern sharks. Reported land-

ings started in 2000 (249 t) then declined from 266 t in 2001 to 1 t in 2007, since when

there have been no reported landings.

Lowfin gulper shark Centrophorus lusitanicus

Reported landings of this species in Portuguese area (ICES Subarea 9) in 2009–2014

(Tables 5.8. and 5.9) are believed to refer to misidentified C. squamosus, C. coelolepis, S.

ringens, D. calcea and D. profundorum (Serra-Pereira et al., WD 2011; Lagarto et al., 2013

WD).

Norwegian skate Dipturus nidarosiensis

The species is occasionally landed in three French ports mostly under the landing name

"D. oxyrinchus" with the code RJO. The length–frequency distribution of Dipturus ni-

darosiensis observed in the 2012–2014 French landing are presented in Figure 5.1, indi-

viduals landed mostly come from the ICES Division 6.a.

Other skates

Surveys of French fish markets show that Rajella lintea, Rajella kukujevi, Rajella fyllae,

Bathyraja spinicauda and Dipturus nidarosiensis are occasionally landed from ICES Divi-

sion 6.a, but without specific landing names.

5.3.2 Discards

Portugal (Azores)

Discards data from the Azorean observer programme waere provided in Pinho and

Canha (2011 WD; Table 5.10). Since then, this information has not been updated.

Portugal (mainland)

Discards data from the Portuguese longline fishery were presented. Etmopterus spp.

and C. crepidater are the species with higher percentages of discards along the time-

series (although C. crepidater was not sampled in 2013). Other elasmobranchs were


rarely discarded (Prista et al., 2014 WD). Estimates of percentage discarded by species

from deep-water longlines and demersal bottom trawls are given in Table 5.11.

To evaluate the level of bycatch and discards of deep-water sharks in the Portuguese

trammelnet fishery, a pilot study was undertaken in ICES Division 9.a (Moura et al.,

2015 WD). Results show that the fishery targeting anglerfish and operating at depths

of 200–600 m has a low frequency of occurrence of deep-water sharks (Table 5.12). Re-

sults further suggest that relatively higher frequencies of occurrence are likely to be

observed deeper than 600 m, according to the depth ranges reported for most of these

species.

Spain

The Spanish Discards Sampling Programme for Otter and Pair Bottom Trawl (OTB and

PTB) fleets, covering ICES Subareas 6, 7, Division 8.c and 9 (North), started in 1988;

however, it did not have yearly continuity until 2003. The sampling strategy and the

estimation methodology used follows the “Workshop on Discard Sampling Methodol-

ogy and Raising Procedures” guidelines (ICES, 2003) and more detail of this applied to

this area was explained in Santos et al. (2010). Preliminary estimates of Spanish deep-

water elasmobranch discards (2003–2014) are presented in Table 5.13.

5.3.3 Quality of the catch data

Unknown quantities of deep-water species are landed in grouped categories such as

“sharks nei”, “Dogfish nei” and “Raja rays nei”, so catches presented here are probably

underestimated. Landings reported by UK vessels for 2003/2004 were considered to be

unreliably identified and were therefore amalgamated into a mixed deep-water shark

(siki) category together with Portuguese dogfish and leafscale gulper shark. Since

2005/2006, UK landings for most species were considered to be more reliably identified;

however, reported landings of gulper shark are still considered to be unreliable and

have been added to landings of siki sharks.

As result of restrictive quotas for deep-water sharks, landings of these species from the

Portuguese longline fishery in Division 9.a may have been misidentified.

In addition, it is likely that the available landing data for some species may be unrelia-

ble due to problems with species identification. For example gulper shark Centrophorus

granulosus may be sometimes confused with morphologically similar species such as

C. lusitanicus and C. harrissoni (Compagno et al., 2005). Also White et al. (2013) demon-

strated that C. niaukang is an ontogenic stage of C. granulosus.

5.3.4 Discard survival

No data available to the Working Group.

5.4 Commercial catch composition

No new information is available.

5.5 Commercial catch and effort data

No new information is available.


5.6 Fishery-independent surveys

5.6.1 ICES Subarea 6

The Scottish deep-water trawl survey has operated from 1996 to 2015 at depths of 300–

2000 m along the continental slope between approximately 55˚N and 59˚N (see Neat et

al., 2010 for details). Neat et al. (2015) analysed catches of deep-water elasmobranch

species from Scottish deep-water trawl survey.


The Spanish survey on the Porcupine Bank (SpPGFS-WIBTS-Q4) in ICES Divisions 7.c

and 7.k covers an area from longitude 12°W to 15°W and from latitude 51°N to 54°N

following the standard IBTS methodology for the western and southern areas (ICES,

2010). The sampling design is a random stratified (Velasco and Serrano, 2003) with two

geographical sectors (North and South) and three depth strata (< 300 m, 300–450 m and

450–800 m). Haul allocation is proportional to the strata area following a buffered ran-

dom sampling procedure (as proposed by Kingsley et al., 2004) to avoid the selection

of adjacent 5×5 nm rectangles. More details on the survey design and methodology are

presented in Ruiz-Pico et al. (2014 WD) and Fernández-Zapico et al. (2015 WD). Results

for 2015 are presented in Ruiz-Pico et al. (2016 WD)

The most abundant deep-water shark species in biomass in these surveys were Deania

calcea (birdbeak dogfish), Deania profundorum (arrowhead dogfish), Scymnodon ringens

(Knifetooth dogfish), Etmopterus spinax (velvet belly lantern shark), Dalatias licha (Kite-

fin shark), and Hexanchus griseus (bluntnose six-gill shark).

5.6.3 ICES Divisions 8.c and 9.a

The Spanish IEO Q4-IBTS survey in the Cantabrian Sea and Galician waters covers this

area annually since 1983 (except in 1987), obtaining abundance indices and length dis-

tributions for the main commercial species and elasmobranchs. More details on the

survey design, methodology and results can be found in Ruiz-Pico et al. (2015 WD;

Fernández-Zapico et al., 2016 WD). In 2015, elasmobranchs made up ca. 6% of the total

fish catch. All species showed a decrease in biomass with regard to 2014., A new vessel

(R/V Miguel Oliver) is in use since 2013.

In the Portuguese survey (PtGFS-WIBTS-Q4) taking place off southwestern and south-

ern coasts the deep-water elasmobranch with highest catches is D. profundorum. This

survey is designed for crustacean species and operates to depths of 700 m.


Data from the Azorean bottom longline survey (ARQDACO(P)-Q1) in Division 10.a2

were given in Pinho (2014 WD). Deania spp. were the most representative (abundant)

species in the survey. C. crepidater was common, but much less abundant. Other species

occurred in very low numbers (averaging 1–4 individuals per year). Depth range sand

length composition data are available. It should be noted that the gear configuration

used is not adequate for sampling all the species (Pinho, 2014 WD).

5.7 Life-history information

Several recent studies have provided relevant biological information:


Moore et al. (2013) provide length of first maturity of Centroscymnus crepidater (57.2 cm

total length (TL) for males and 75.4 cm TL for females) and of Apristurus aphyodes (49.0

cm TL for males and 56.9 cm TL for females) from the Rockall Trough.

Rodriguez-Cabello et al. (2013) showed that the distribution of Galeus murinus extended

southward, to Cantabrian Sea, and Neoraja caerulea and northwards the distribution of

Neoraja iberica.

Coelho et al. (2014) conducted demographic analysis of E. spinax using an age-based

model. They found that the population should be stable if there is a two year repro-

ductive cycle, but would be declining if there is a three year cycle, highlighting why an

accurate knowledge of reproductive periodicity is important.

Moura et al. (2014) found that Deania calcea was spatially segregated by size, sex and

maturity. Pregnant females inhabit shallower and warmer waters; large immature

specimens were deeper, and mature males were more broadly distributed than mature

females, supporting the possibility of sex-biased dispersal.

5.8 Exploratory assessments analyses of relative abundance indices

The exploratory assessments below are all based on analyses of relative abundance in-

dices in fishery-independent surveys.

5.8.1 Spanish Porcupine Bank (SpPGFS-WIBTS-Q4) and Spanish IEO Q4-IBTS

survey

Abundance indices for some deep-water elasmobranchs caught in the Spanish survey

on the Porcupine Bank (SpPGFS-WIBTS-Q4) and the Spanish IEO Q4-IBTS survey in

the Cantabrian Sea and Galician waters are presented below.

Information for E. spinax, H. griseus, S. ringens, D. calcea and D. profundorum is presented

however the majority of these species are usually found at deeper waters than those

covered by the Spanish IEO Q4-IBTS survey (additional hauls) and thus the abundance

indices must be treated with caution.

5.8.2 Scottish deep-water trawl survey in Division 6.a

Neat et al. (2015) analysed catches of deep-water elasmobranch species from the Scot-

tish deep-water trawl survey in Division 6.a. Selected results are presented below.

Scientific dual-warp bottom-trawls with rock-hopper ground gear (for details see Neat

et al., 2010) were carried out at 527 sites along the deep-water slopes, banks and sea-

mounts of the Rockall Trough, to the west of Scotland. Surveys were carried out from

1996–2013 at depths of 300–2030 m. In 1996 FRV Scotia IV was in service, but was re-

placed by FRV Scotia V in 1998. Most of the records in the database derive from Scotia

V and in particular from surveys carried out in September that used the Jackson BT-

184 deep-water bottom trawl. For species distribution mapping all data were used, but

for statistical analyses over time only data from 1998 onwards (Scotia V only) and only

data collected with the same trawl net (Jackson BT184) from the continental slope dur-

ing the month of September were used. For some species of the genus Apristurus there

has been an ongoing taxonomic debate, for example A. melanoasper was only formally

described in 2004. Therefore time-series analyses were restricted to two of the more

common Apristurus species (A. aphyodes and A. microps) that did not pose identification

problems or nomenclature changes during the survey period.


For each species, the relationship between number caught per hour of trawling and

depth were visually inspected and a core depth range established that included >99%

of individuals. All hauls within this range (including those with zero catch of that spe-

cies) were used to generate estimates of catch per unit of effort. As a consequence of

variable depth ranges of each species, the sample sizes (number of hauls) vary from

species to species.

Distribution maps for each species were produced using ARC GIS. To assess areas of

relatively high abundance in close proximity to each other, the ‘Hot Spot Analysis’ tool

in ARC GIS was used. This calculates the ‘Getis-Ord Gi’ statistic for each feature in a

dataset. The resultant values indicate where features with either high or low values

cluster spatially based on the proximity of neighbouring features. The analysis high-

lights samples with a high value that are surrounded by other features with high values

as well. It is a useful tool for visualising the spatial distribution of high abundance data.

General additive models (Zuur et al., 2009) were used to analyse trends over time, as

the relative abundance of most species showed non-linear relationships with depth and

over time. The GAM uses a smoothing function to account for the non-linear relation-

ships. Latitude was also included in the model as a continuous variable as there was

often a weak but significant relationship. Negative binomial or Tweedie variance struc-

tures were used to account for the variable occurrence of hauls with zero catch. GAMs

were applied to eleven species that were regularly encountered from year-to-year.

Several species were too infrequently sampled to analyse.

5.8.3 Summary of trends by species

Birdbeak dogfish Deania calcea and Arrowhead dogfish Deania profundorum

In the SpPGFS-WIBTS-Q4 survey series, these two species were traditionally registered

together, but have been better separated since 2012, as reported in previous documents

(Ruiz-Pico et al., 2014). The most recent survey indicates that both species decreased

both its abundance and biomass in 2015, in relation to 2014. D. calcea remains repre-

senting the most percentage of the Deania genus in the area (Figure 5.2). Analysing both

species together, 2015 showed a decrease both in biomass and in number, after the

peak of catch registered in 2014, the highest value for the historical series. (Ruiz-Pico

et al., 2016 WD).

In the Spanish IEO Q4-IBTS survey in the Cantabrian Sea and Galician waters, D. calcea

and D. profundorum were recorded together until 2009. D. profundorum was first sepa-

rately recorded in 2009 (Sanjuan et al., 2012), To avoid confounding effects between the

two species results previous to 2009 combine the two species and were referred as

Deania spp. (Figure 5.3). Biomass values of D. calcea in 2015 in ICES Divisio 8.c were

similar to 2014. This species was not caught in ICES Division 9.a(N). D. profundorum

increased in both divisions, although in greater proportion in Division 9.a(N) (Fernán-

dez-Zapico et al., 2016 WD).

The abundance of Deania calcea in hauls within the core depth range of 400–1500 m on

the Scottish slope has fluctuated generally between 0.7 and 2.2 ind.h–1 with no evident

trend (since 1998; Table 5.14). The catch rate in 2013 was anomalously high at

5 ind.h–1, the highest in the series. Preliminary analyses by Neat et al. (2015) showed a

significant positive trend (p = 0.001) over time (Figure 5.4). The results of this analysis

should be considered as preliminary and indicative only of general trends.


Knifetooth dogfish Scymnodon ringens

In the Spanish Porcupine survey (SpPGFS-WIBTS-Q4) a slight decrease in biomass and

abundance of S. ringens was observed in 2015 (Figure 5.5). (Ruiz-Pico et al., 2016 WD).

Biomass values in the Spanish IEO Q4-IBTS survey in the Cantabrian Sea and Galician

waters are very low. These values have fluctuated since 2004 with no evident trend

(Figure 5.6). In 2015 the value was similar to the one observed in 2014, slightly above

the maximum value of the series registered in 2013 (Fernandez-Zapico et al., 2016 WD).

Velvet belly lantern shark Etmopterus spinax

Both the biomass and abundance indexes of E. spinax in the Spanish Porcupine survey

(SpPGFS-WIBTS-Q4) decreased in 2015, in relation to to the peak registered in 2014

(Figure 5.7; Ruiz-Pico et al., 2016 WD).

In the Spanish IEO Q4-IBTS survey in the Cantabrian Sea and Galician waters, the bi-

omass index shows an increasing trend since 1996 with the strong increase in recent

years (2006–2013); the highest value was registered in 2013 (Figure 5.8). In 2015, about

94% of the biomass of this scarce elasmobranch was found in hauls deeper than 500 m

(Fernandez-Zapico et al., 2016 WD). In Division 9.a(N), E. spinax was more frequent in

hauls deeper than 500m than in 2014.

The relative abundance of Etmopterus spinax derived from Scottish deep-water survey

at depths from 300 to 1100 m has varied with no overall trend (between 3–10 ind.h–1)

since 1998 (Table 5.15 and Figure 5.9). Preliminary analyses using GAM with Tweedie

distribution suggest no significant trend over time (Neat et al., 2015).

Greater lantern shark Etmopterus princeps

The relative abundance of this species between depths of 800–1800 m from Scottish

deep-water survey has been variable (averaging 3 ind.h–1), for the past 14 years (Table

5.16; Figure 5.10). Preliminary analyses using GAM with Tweedie distribution suggest

no trend over time (Neat et al., 2015).

Bluntnose six-gill shark Hexanchus griseus

Stratified biomass indicex of H. griseus in the Spanish Porcupine survey decreased in

2015, after a increasing trend observed in the preceeding years, (Ruiz-Pico et al., 2016

WD) . On the contrary, abundance has increased in 2015 (Figure 5.11). The absence of

large individuals, which contributed to the peak observed in 2014, explain the drop of

the biomass this last survey (Ruiz-Pico et al., 2016 WD) .

In the Spanish IEO Q4-IBTS survey in the Cantabrian Sea and Galician waters, the bi-

omass of H. griseus increased in relation to 2014, although not reaching the maximum

value of the historical series observed in 2013. Figure 5.12) (Fernandez-Zapico et al.,

2016 WD).

The relative abundance of H. griseus between depths of 300–800 m from Scottish deep-

water survey averaged <1 ind.h–1 over the past 14 years (Table 5.17). There was an

anomalously high catch of 15 individuals in 2008.

Black dogfish Centroscylium fabricii

The relative abundance of C. fabricii between depths of 800–1800 m from Scottish deep-

water survey has fluctuated with no trend (ca. 5 ind.h–1) since 1998 (Table 5.18; Figure

5.13). Variability of the catch rates is high, wityh occasional large catches recorded.


Preliminary analyses using GAM with Tweedie distribution suggest no significant

trend over time (Neat et al., 2015).

Longnose velvet dogfish Centroscymnus crepidater


deep-water survey has been variable (averaging 5 ind.h–1, but with occasional very

high catches) for the past 14 years (Table 5.19; Figure 5.14). Preliminary analyses using

GAM with Tweedie distribution suggest a significant negative trend (p <0.001) over

time (Neat et al., 2015).

Small-eye cat shark Apristurus microps

The relative abundance of this species at depths of 500–1500 m from Scottish deep-

water survey was, on average, 1 ind.h–1 over the past 14 years (Table 5.20; Figure 5.15).

Pale catshark Apristurus aphyodes


deep-water survey was on average 4 ind.h–1 for the past 14 years (Table 5.21; Figure

5.16). Preliminary analyses using GAM with Tweedie distribution suggest an increas-

ing trend over time (p < 0.001) (Neat et al., 2015).

Deep-water skates and rays

Skates are caught infrequently in the Scottish deep-water survey, and the total numbers

of each species (blue pygmy skate Neoraja caerulea, Mid-Atlantic skate Rajella kukujevi,

round skate Rajella fyllae, deep-water skate Rajella bathyphila, Bigelow's skate Rajella bi-

gelowi, Richardson's skate Bathyraja richardsoni, Jensen's skate Amblyraja jenseni and

Krefft's skate Malacoraja kreffti) each year are shown in Table 5.22.

5.9 Stock assessment

No formal assessments are undertaken for these stocks.

5.10 Quality of assessments

No assessments undertaken.

5.11 Reference points

No reference points have been proposed for any of these species.

5.12 Conservation considerations

The recent European Red List of mairne fishes considers Centrophorus granulosus to be

Critically Endangered, Centrophorus lusitanicus, Echinorhinus brucus, Deania calcea and

Dalatias licha as Endangered; and Centrophorus uyato and Oxynotus centrina as Vulnera-

ble (Nieto et al., 2015).

5.13 Management considerations

No management advice is given in 2016.

5.14 References

Coelho, R., Alpizar-Jara, R., and Erzini, K. 2014. Demography of a deep-sea lantern shark

(Etmopterus spinax) caught in trawl fisheries of the northeastern Atlantic: Application of


Leslie matrices with incorporated uncertainties. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in

Oceanography. DOI: 10.1016/j.drs2.2014.01.012.

Compagno, L., Dando, M. and Fowler, S. 2005. Sharks of the World. Collins Field Guide. Harper

Collins Publishers, London, 368 pp.

Fernández-Zapico, O., Velasco, F., Baldó, F., Rodríguez-Cabello, C., Ruiz-Pico, S. 2015. Results

on main elasmobranch species captured during the 2001–2014 Porcupine Bank (NE Atlantic)

bottom trawl surveys. Working document ICES WGEF, 25 pp.

Fernández-Zapico, O., Velasco, F., Rodríguez-Cabello, C., Punzón, A., Preciado, I., Ruiz-Pico, S.,

Blanco, M. 2016. Results on main elasmobranch species captured in the bottom trawl sur-

veys on the Northern Spanish Shelf. Working document ICES WGEF, 22 pp.

ICES. 2003. Report of ICES Workshop on Discard Sampling Methodology and Raising Proce-

dures. Charlottenlund, Denmark, 2–4 September 2003.

ICES. 2010. Manual for the International Bottom Trawl. Surveys in the Western and Southern

Areas, Revision III. 64 pp.

Kingsley, M.C.S., Kanneworff, P., and Carlsson, D.M. 2004. Buffered random sampling: a se-

quential inhibited spatial point process applied to sampling in a trawl survey for northern

shrimp Pandalus borealis in West Greenland waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 61: 12–24.

Lagarto, N., Moura, T., Farias, I. and Figueiredo, I. 2013. Sampling information from deep-water

sharks caught in the black scabbardfish fishery from mainland Portugal. Working Docu-

ment ICES WGEF 2013; 3 pp.

Moore, D., Neat, F., and McCarthy I. 2013. Population biology and ageing of the deep water

sharks Galeus melastomus, Centroscymnus crepidater and Apristurus aphyodes from the Rockall

Trough, North-east Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK, 93: 1941–

1950.

Moura, T., Fernandes, A., Figueiredo, I., Alpoim, R., Azevedo, M. 2015. Results from the pilot

study on the Portuguese trammel nets fishery targeting anglerfish in ICES Division IXa.

Working Document to ICES Working Group on Elasmobranch Fishes (WGEF), Lisbon, 2015;

7 pp.

Moura, T., Jones, E., Clarke, M., Cotton, C., Crozier, P., Daley, R., Diez, G., Dobby, H., Dyb, J.,

Fossen, I., Irvine, S., Jakobsdottir, K., López-Abellán, L., Lorance, P., Pascual-Alayón, P.,

Severino, R., and Figueiredo, I. 2014. Large-scale distribution of three deep-water squaloid

sharks: Integrating data on sex, maturity and environment. Fisheries Research, 157: 47–61.

Neat, F. C., Burns, F., Jones, E. and Blasdale, T. 2015. The diversity, distribution and status of

deep-water elasmobranchs in the Rockall Trough, north-east Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Fish

Biology, 87: 1469–1488.

Neat, F. C., Kynoch, R.J., Drewery, J. and Burns, F. 2010. Deepwater survey manual. Marine Scot-

land Science: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/295194/0103756.pdf.

Nieto, A., Ralph, G. M., Comeros-Raynal, M. T., Kemp, J., Garcia Criado, M., et al. 2015. European

Red List of marine fishes. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Pinho, M. R. 2010. Update landings of elasmobranches from the Azores (ICES Area X). Working

Document ICES WGEF, 2010-19; 10 pp.

Pinho, M.R. 2014. Resuming elasmobranchs survey data from the Azores (ICES X). Working

Document to the ICES Working Group on Elasmobranch Fishes, Lisbon, June 17–26 2014;

18 pp.

Pinho, M. R. and Canha, A. 2011. Elasmobranchs discards from the Azores longline fishery (ICES

Subdivision Xa2). ICES Working Document WGEF.

Prista, N., Fernades, A., Maia, C., Moura, T., and Figueiredo I. 2014. Discards of elasmobranchs

in the Portuguese fisheries operating in ICES Division XIa: Bottom otter trawl, deepwater

http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/295194/0103756.pdf


set longlines, set gillnet and trammel net fisheries (2004–2013). WD WGEF 2014, Lisbon, 17–

26 June 2014; 20 pp.

Rodriguez-Cabello, C., Pérez, M., and Sanchez, F. 2013. New records of chondrichthyans species

in the Cantabrian Sea (southern Bay of Biscay). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of

the UK, 93: 1929–1939.

Ruiz-Pico, S., Velasco, F., Baldó, F., Rodríguez-Cabello, C., Fernández-Zapico, O. 2014. Results

on main elasmobranch species captured during the 2001–2013 Porcupine Bank (NE Atlantic)

bottom trawl surveys. Working Document ICES WGEF; 26 pp.

Ruiz-Pico, S., Velasco, F., Baldó, F., Rodríguez-Cabello, C., Punzón, A., Preciado, I., Fernández-

Zapico, O., Blanco, M. 2015. Results on main elasmobranch species captured in the bottom

trawl surveys on the Northern Spanish Shelf. Working Document ICES WGEF; 19 pp.

Ruiz-Pico, S., Baldó, F., Velasco, F., Rodríguez-Cabello, C., Fernández-Zapico, O. 2016. Results

on main elasmobranches species from 2001 to 2015 Porcupine Bank (NE Atlantic) bottom

trawl surveysWorking Document ICES WGEF; 29 pp.

Santos J., H. Araújo, I. Salinas and N. Pérez. 2010. Elasmobranches Results from Spanish Discard

Sampling Programme. ICES WGEF.2010; 6 pp.

Serra-Pereira, B., Moura, T., Farias, I., Maia, C., Lagarto, N., Veiga, N., and Figueiredo, I. 2011.

Information on sharks, rays and skates landings from mainland Portugal. Working Docu-

ment ICES WGEF; 13 pp.

Velasco, F., and Serrano, A. 2003. Distribution patterns of bottom trawl faunal assemblages in

Porcupine Bank: Implications for Porcupine surveys stratification design. Working Docu-

ment presented to IBTSWG 2003; 19 pp.

Vinnichenko, V.I. and Fomin K. Yu. 2009. Russian research and fisheries of sharks and skates in

the Northeast Atlantic in 2008. Working document presented to ICES WGEF 2009; 12 pp.

Vinnichenko, V.I., Dolgov, A.V. and A.S.Yurko. 2010. Russian Research and Fisheries of Sharks

and Skates in the Northeast Atlantic in 2009. Working Document to WGEF WD2010-14.

White, W., Ebert, D., Naylor, G., Ho, H-C., Clerkin, P., Verissimo, A., and Cotton, C. 2014. Revi-

sion of the genus Centrophorus (Squaliformes: Centrophoridae): Part 1-Redescription of Cen-

trophorus granulosus Bloch and Schneider), a senior synonym of C. acus Garman and C.

niaukang Teng. Zootaxa, 3752 (1): 035–072.

Zuur, A., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A., Smith, G. M. 2009. Mixed effects models and

extensions in ecology with R. Springer; 574 pp.


Table 5.1. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Working Group

estimates of landings of gulper shark.

Portugal Spain total

1990 1056 1056

1991 801 801

1992 958 958

1993 886 886

1994 344 344

1995 423 423

1996 242 242

1997 291 291

1998 187 187

1999 95 95

2000 54 54

2001 96 96

2002 159 8 167

2003 203 203

2004 89.4 n.a. 89.4

2005 62.2 n.a. 62.2

2006 104 104

2007 132 132

2008 93 93

2009 13 13

2010 6.4 6.4

2011 3 + 3

2012 0

2013 0

2014 0.03 0.03



estimates of landings of birdbeak dogfish.

Ireland Spain UK (England and Wales) UK(Scotland) France Portugal Total

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000 13 13

2001 1 37 38

2002 5 + 67 72

2003 n.a. + 3 72 75

2004 n.a. + 38 157 195

2005 n.a 47 2 145 194

2006 19 74 94

2007 43 43

2008 5 66 71

2009 22 22

2010 5 5

2011 + 1 1

2012 0.815 + 1 1

2013 0.815 + 0.3 0.3

2014



estimates of landings of longnose velvet dogfish.

France UK (Scotland) UK (England and Wales) Portugal Spain Total

7.5

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999 + + +

2000 + + 1 85 86

2001 + + 3 68 71

2002 13 + 4 n.a. 17

2003 10 21 + 2 n.a. 33

2004 8 7 + 1 n.a. 16

2005 6 97 113 . n.a. 216

2006 0 128 281 0 0 409

2007 0 19 0 1 20

2008 5 0 0 0 5

2009 27 27

2010 + 0

2011 0 0

2012 0 0

2013 0 0

2014 0 0



estimates of landings of black dogfish.

France Iceland UK (England and Wales) Spain Total

1990

1991

1992 1

1993

1994

1995 1

1996 4

1997

1998

1999 +

2000 382 85 467

2001 395 91 486

2002 47 + n.a. 47

2003 90 + + n.a. 90

2004 49 n.a. + n.a. 49

2005 5 5

2006 35 35

2007

2008 137 137

2009 1

2010 10

2011 + 1

2012 + 3

2013 1

2014


estimates of landings of velvet belly.

Norway Denmark UK (Scotland) UK (England and Wales) Spain Total

1990

1991

1992

1993 27 27

1994 + +

1995 10 10

1996 8 8

1997 32 32

1998 359 359

1999 128 128

2000 25 25


2001 52 52

2002 85 85

2003

2004

2005 8 8

2006

2007 8 8

2008

2009

2010

2011 4 2 1 7

2012 11 11

2013 19 0 19

2014 46 46


estimates of landings of lantern sharks NEI.

France Spain Portugal UK Scotland total

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994 846 + 846

1995 2388 + 2388

1996 2888 + 2888

1997 2150 + 2150

1998 2043 2043

1999 + +

2000 + 38 + 38

2001 + 338 338

2002 + 99 99

2003 + +

2004 + + +

2005 + +

2006 + +

2007

2008 20 20

2009 0.008 +

2010

2011 +

2012 + + +

2013 + +

2014



estimates of landings of “aiguillat noir”.

France total

2000 123 123

2001 165 165

2002 11 11

2003 37 37

2004 21 21

2005 5 5


estimates of landings of Centrophorus lusitanicus.

Portugal total

2007 n.a.

2008 n.a.

2009 423 423

2010 271 271

2011 584 584

2012 688 688

2013 613 613

2014 + +


Table 5.9. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Working Group estimates of landings by species.

Species 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Gulper shark 1056 801 958 886 344 423 242 291 187 95 54 96

Birdbeak dogfish 13 38

Black dogfish 467 486

Longnose velvet dogfish 86 71

Velvet belly 27 + 10 8 32 359 128 25 52

Lantern shark NEI 846 2388 2888 2150 2043 + 38 338

Aiguillat noir 123 165

Angular roughshark

Lowfin gulper shark

Knifetooth dogfish

Arrowhead dogfish

TOTAL 1127 876 1042 974 1269 2893 3238 2588 2708 303 894 1340


Table 5.9. Continued.

Species 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Gulper shark 167 203 89 62 104 132 93 20 7 3 1 1 +

Birdbeak dogfish 72 75 195 194 94 43 72 22 5 1 2 1 0

Black dogfish 47 90 49 5 35 1 137 1 10 1 3 1 0

Longnose velvet dogfish 17 33 16 216 409 23 2 27 0 0 1 1 +

Velvet belly 85 8 8 0 0 0 23 11 19 46

Lantern shark nei 99 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0

Aiguillat noir 11 37 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Angular Roughshark 75 99 52 0 0 54 46 17 0 0 0

Lowfin gulper shark 0 0 311 271 584 689 613 +

Knifetooth dogfish 196 0 83 115 4 5 1 0

Arrowhead dogfish n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5 1 0 0

TOTAL 641 523 562 684 750 432 404 561 505 675 757 657 46


Table 5.10. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Discards of deep-water

shark species (numbers) recorded by Azores observers 2005–2010.

Species Damaged Non commercial Undersized Not identified Total

Centrophorus granulosus 2 2

Dalatias licha 41 3 44

Deania calceus 6 254 1 261

Etmopterus spinax 8 6302 8 1 6319

Hexanchus griseus 2 1 2 5

Table 5.11. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Frequency of occur-

rence (%) of deep-water sharks in the discards of the hauls sampled on board the Portuguese fish-

eries by gear type: crustacean bottom otter trawl - OTB_CRU; demersal fish bottom otter trawl -

OTB_DEF; deep-water set longline fishery that targets black scabbardfish LLS_DWS (2004–2012).

“---” indicates no occurrence; NA, information not available by species.

Fishery YEAR 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

OTB_CRU Deania calcea 5 5 3 4 9 2 2 2 4 NA

Centrophorus granulosus --- --- --- --- --- --- 1 --- 1 NA

Deania profundorum --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 2 --- NA

Etmopterus spp. 36 24 50 22 17 8 11 23 29 7

OTB_DEF Deania calcea 1 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- NA

Etmopterus spp. 4 3 1 --- --- 2 --- --- --- ---

LLS_DWS Centroscymnus crepidater --- --- 80 67 25 17 22 17 11 ---

Centroscymnus cryptacanthus --- --- --- --- 25 --- --- --- --- NA

Deania calcea --- --- --- --- 25 17 11 --- 22 NA

Squalus spp. --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 11 NA

Deep-water sharks nei --- --- --- --- --- --- 22 --- --- NA

Deania profundorum --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 11 NA

Etmopterus spp. --- 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Scymnodon ringens --- 67 --- 67 --- 17 --- --- --- NA


Table 5.12. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Number and catch

weight of anglerfish (Lophius spp.) and number of sharks by 100 m depth strata sampled from the

pilot study on the trammelnet fishery targeting anglerfish in Portuguese waters (Division 9.a)

(2012–2014). Lophius spp. combines Lophius piscatorius and Lophius budegassa. N = number of

sampled specimens; West, estimated weight (based on length–weight relationships). From Moura et

al. (2015 WD).

Depth stratum (m)

Total 100–

200

200–

300

300–

400

400–

500

500–

600

>600

Species n n n n n n n

Centroscymnus crepidater* 2 1 1

Scymnodon ringens* 3 1 2

Chlamydoselachus

anguineus*

8 2 1 5

Dalatias licha* 6 1 1 4

Centrophorus granulosus* 1 1

Deania calcea* 13 3 2 9

Etmopterus spinax* 4 4

Etmopterus pusillus 3 1 2

Squaliformes NI 1 1

Mitsukurina owstoni 2 2

Galeus atlanticus 1 1

Galeus spp. 50 3 6 12 12 5 12

Scyliorhinus canicula 177 29 107 40 1 0 0

Mustelus spp. 1 1

Isurus oxyrhinchus 1 1

Prionace glauca 5 4 1

Galeorhinus galeus 3 3

Lophius spp. (n) 3229 344 2040 716 13 25 91

Lophius spp. (weight,

kg)

11 711.1 1254.4 6564.7 2416.5 149.9 187.9 1137.8

No hauls 90 16 50 14 2 2 6

* sharks included in the EU deep-water shark list.


Table 5.13. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Spanish discard data

of deep-water shark species. In bold weight discarded (tons.) of demersal elasmobranches and be-

low in italics. CV of estimations by fishing ground. For detailed information see (Santos et al.,

2010).

Fishing Ground

Species

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Celtic Sea

(Subareas 6–7)

Dalatias licha 0 90.9 13.9 1.3 0 0 2.9 0.5 47.7 0.4

- 99.7 99.7 98.8 - - 99.3 99.5 99.7 99.6

Deania calcea 0 9.8 87.3 17.3 22.2 6.1 2.6 3.6 0 6.2

- 99.7 76 49.5 99.7 62.1 99.3 99.5 - 72

Etmopterus spinax 16.2 296.1 117.7 2.8 6.6 653.6 60.1 206.1 167.2 16.9

63.5 94.4 59.5 84.7 99.7 92.9 39.1 76.3 80.5 96.8

Galeus melastomus 90.1 504.4 169.5 12.8 220.7 456.6 984.6 1045.7 737.1 395.1 6.3

95.1 64.3 57.1 36.6 47.8 73.5 81.3 77 44.6 89.7

Iberian Waters

(Divisions 8.c–9.a)

Dalatias licha 0 0 1.3 2.6 0 0 0 3.8 0 0.1 2.0

- - 102.6 100.2 - - - 99.7 - 99.7 84.3

Deania calcea 10.8 51.4 5.5 22.8 1.8 17.9 27.6 157.4 32.4 39.5 164

54.9 81.3 61.4 84.5 69.9 96.6 53.9 62.1 43.4 49.9 47.7

Etmopterus spinax 0.5 332.1 5.6 1.8 1.7 19.5 37.9 28.8 23.3 78.5 14.7

90.5 90.8 49.5 68.5 59.4 58.9 75.6 58.6 79.5 72.7 58.1

Galeus melastomus 588.8 243.5 527.3 553.2 1063.4 225.8 903.7 1271.9 730.7 1433 749 1123

31.4 54.8 36 60.7 36.7 28.5 62.8 51.1 34.8 40.5 31.8

Table 5.14. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Summary data for

Birdbeak dogfish D. calcea from Scottish deep-water survey. (N hauls- number of hauls; N fish-

number of fishes; Mean NpH – mean number per hour).

Year N hauls N fish Mean NpH

proportion of

positive hauls

1998 19 28 0.7 0.63

2000 31 134 2.2 0.9

2002 27 79 1.6 0.84

2004 24 73 1.7 0.63

2005 18 35 1.0 0.47

2006 28 109 2.1 0.68

2007 18 59 1.7 0.47

2008 25 41 1.0 0.26

2009 31 19 0.7 0.42

2011 21 14 0.6 0.37

2012 21 34 1.8 0.58

2013 23 109 5.0 0.63


Table 5.15. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic Summary data for vel-

vet belly Etmopterus spinax from Scottish deep-water survey. (N hauls- number of hauls; N fish-

number of fishes; Mean NpH – mean number per hour).


proportion of

positive hauls

1998 18 319 8.5 0.39

2000 22 360 8.4 0.36

2002 20 137 3.8 0.55

2004 19 137 4.1 0.32

2005 13 98 3.8 0.31

2006 21 201 5 0.33

2007 12 221 9.4 0.42

2008 17 257 8.7 0.53

2009 24 91 4.6 0.13

2011 13 66 5 0.38

2012 27 176 7.6 0.52

2013 37 367 10.5 0.46


greater lantern shark Etmpterus princeps from Scottish deep-water survey. (N hauls- number of

hauls; N fish- number of fishes; Mean NpH – mean number per hour).


proportion of

positive hauls

2000 20 148 3.70 0.63

2002 16 247 8.33 0.81

2004 14 123 4.48 0.54

2005 14 77 2.75 0.58

2006 19 102 3.97 0.56

2007 15 163 5.62 0.69

2008 22 57 1.74 0.55

2009 29 149 5.62 0.48

2011 21 68 2.96 0.61

2012 22 74 3.46 0.36

2013 23 118 5.2 0.52



bluntnose six-gill shark Hexanchus griseus from Scottish deep-water survey. (N hauls- number of

hauls; N fish- number of fishes; Mean NpH – mean number per hour).

YEAR N HAULS N FISH MEAN NPH

PROPORTION OF

POSITIVE HAULS

1998 18 1 0.03 0.06

2000 16 0 0 0

2002 13 3 0.13 0.15

2004 14 0 0 0

2005 7 2 0.14 0.14

2006 11 1 0.05 0.09

2007 6 8 0.68 0.33

2008 8 15 1.09 0.25

2009 8 1 0.14 0.13

2011 8 0 0 0

2012 8 1 0.14 0.13

2013 11 3 0.31 0.18


black dogfish Centroscymnus fabricii from Scottish deep-water survey. (N hauls- number of hauls;

N fish- number of fishes; Mean NpH – mean number per hour).


proportion of

positive hauls

2000 20 372 9.3 0.75

2002 15 107 3.8 0.53

2004 13 104 4.0 0.46

2005 12 158 6.6 0.58

2006 17 180 5.6 0.53

2007 12 109 4.6 0.5

2008 19 175 5.7 0.58

2009 25 138 6.4 0.56

2011 14 214 14.1 0.64

2012 14 119 9.9 0.64

2013 13 71 5.4 0.62



long-nosed velvet dogfish Centroscymnus crepidater from Scottish deep-water survey. (N hauls-

number of hauls; N fish- number of fishes; Mean NpH – mean number per hour).

Year N hauls N fish Mean Nph

proportion of

positive hauls

1998 18 1054 27.2 0.78

2000 28 524 9.6 0.75

2002 23 276 6.6 0.74

2004 20 341 9.3 0.7

2005 17 248 7.3 0.71

2006 25 271 5.8 0.72

2007 15 213 7.1 0.67

2008 18 499 16.2 0.72

2009 25 192 9.1 0.64

2011 17 183 10.1 0.47

2012 16 103 7.3 0.56

2013 21 223 11.0 0.48


mouse catshark Galeus murinus from Scottish deep-water survey. (N hauls- number of hauls; N

fish- number of fishes; Mean NpH – mean number per hour).


proportion of

positive hauls

1998 7 16 0.984615 0.57

2000 15 38 1.271612 0.6

2002 10 56 3.146067 0.6

2004 8 18 1.142857 0.5

2005 8 2 0.125 0.12

2006 10 30 1.578947 0.6

2007 6 33 2.8125 0.83

2008 9 12 0.75 0.56

2009 16 38 3.064516 0.75

2011 7 4 0.541761 0.43

2012 8 12 1.773399 0.75

2013 9 10 1.149425 0.22


Table 5.21. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Summary data for pale

catshark Apristurs aphyodes from Scottish deep-water survey. .(N hauls- number of hauls; N fish-

number of fishes; Mean NpH – mean number per hour)

YEAR N HAULS N FISH MEAN NPH

PROPORTION OF

POSITIVE HAULS

2000 20 43 1.08 0.2

2002 16 49 1.55 0.44

2004 14 81 2.89 0.57

2005 14 96 3.43 0.54

2006 19 174 5.03 0.61

2007 15 89 2.94 0.46

2008 22 100 3.16 0.6

2009 29 64 2.22 0.3

2011 21 178 7.80 0.56

2012 26 105 4.32 0.58

2013 18 88 5.0 0.39

Table 5.22. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Total number of deep-

water skates caught in the Scottish deep-water survey across all depths by year (blue pygmy skate

Neoraja caerulea, Mid-Atlantic skate Rajella kukujevi, round skate Rajella fyllae, deep-water skate

Rajella bathyphila, Bigelow's skate Rajella bigelowi, Richardson's skate Bathyraja richardsoni,

Jensen's skate Amblyraja jenseni and Krefft's skate Malacoraja kreffti).

Year

N.

caeru

lea

R.

ku

ku

ku

jevi

R.f

yll

ae

R.b

ath

yp

hil

a

R.b

igelo

wi

B.

rich

ard

so

ni

A.

jen

sen

i

M.

kre

fti

1998 1 0 11 0 0 0 0 0

2000 1 0 6 2 2 0 0 0

2002 4 1 9 4 0 0 1 1

2004 0 1 7 1 0 0 0 0

2005 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0

2006 0 0 7 2 1 0 0 0

2007 1 0 4 1 1 0 6 2

2008 0 0 6 0 0 0 3 0

2009 0 0 8 0 2 2 1 1

2011 0 4 4 0 1 0 1 0

2012 5 0 6 0 1 2 6 0

2013 0 0 1 0 3 10 6 2

Total 12 6 71 10 12 14 24 6


Figure 5.1. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Length–frequency dis-

tribution of Dipturus nidarosiensis observed in the 2012–2014 French landing and coming from

ICES Subareas 6–7.

Figure 5.2. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Birdbeak dogfish

Deania calcea biomass index (Kg haul–1) from the Spannish Porcupine survey (SpPGFS-WIBTS-

Q4) time-series (2001–2015). Boxes show parametric standard error of the stratified biomass index.

Lines mark bootstrap confidence intervals (a = 0.80, bootstrap iterations = 1000). From Ruiz-Pico et

al. (2016 WD).

n=116

0

5

10

15

20

25

30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240

Total length (cm)

Nu

mb

er

of

ind

ivid

ual

s o

bse

rve

d

Undeterminate

Female

Male adult

Male Immature

Year

kg

ha

ul1

Biomass

0

5

10

15

20

25

2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

10 %

90 %

Year

Ind

ha

ul1

Number

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

10 %

90 %


Figure 5.3. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Catches by weight of

Deania spp. In north Spanish shelf bottom trawl surveys (Spanish IEO Q4-IBTS survey) 2004–2015,

including all additional hauls out of the standard stratification (>500 m) during the last decade.

From Fernández-Zapico et al. (2016 WD).

Figure 5.4. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Results of GAM anal-

ysis of catches of birdbeak dogfish Deania calcea in Scottish deep-water trawl survey from Neat et

al. (2015) showing (a) Box-whisker plot of numbers per hour for each year. (b) Smoothed function

of relative abundance of across years. (c) Smoothed function of relative abundance of across depths.

(d) Distribution of abundance across the survey area graded from large red dots that indicate hauls

of high abundance in close proximity to other hauls of high abundance to small blue dots that

indicate hauls of low abundance in close proximity to other hauls of low abundance.

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

Deania spp.

Me

an

bio

ma

ss (

Kg

)

02

46

8

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

Hexanchus griseus

Me

an

bio

ma

ss (

Kg

)

0.0

00

.10

0.2

0

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

Scymnodon ringens

Me

an

bio

ma

ss (

Kg

)

0.0

00

.10

0.2

0


Figure 5.5. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Knifetooth dogfish

Scymnodon ringens biomass index (top, kg·haul–1) and abundance index (bottom, numbers. Haul in

the Spanish Porcupine survey (SpPGFS-WIBTS-Q4) time-series (2001–2015). Boxes mark paramet-

ric standard error of the stratified biomass index. Lines mark bootstrap confidence intervals (a =

0.80, bootstrap iterations = 1000). From Ruiz-Pico et al. (2016 WD).


knifetooth dogfish Scymnodon ringens in north Spanish shelf bottom trawl surveys (Spanish IEO

Q4-IBTS survey) 2004–2015 including all additional hauls out of the standard stratification (>500

m) during the last decade. From Fernández-Zapico et al. (2016 WD).

Year

kg

ha

ul1

Biomass

0

2

4

6

8

10

2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

10 %

90 %

Year

Ind

ha

ul1

Number

0

1

2

3

4

5

2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

10 %

90 %

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

Deania spp.

Me

an

bio

ma

ss (

Kg

)

02

46

8

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

Hexanchus griseus

Me

an

bio

ma

ss (

Kg

)

0.0

00

.10

0.2

0

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

Scymnodon ringens

Me

an

bio

ma

ss (

Kg

)

0.0

00

.10

0.2

0


Figure 5.7. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Etmopterus spinax bi-

omass index (top, kg·haul–1) and abundance index (bottom, numbers. haul–1) during Porcupine

survey time-series (2001–2015). Boxes mark parametric standard error of the stratified biomass in-

dex. Lines mark bootstrap confidence intervals (a = 0.80, bootstrap iterations = 1000). From Ruiz-

Pico et al. (2016 WD).


velvet belly shark Etmopterus spinax in north Spanish shelf bottom trawl surveys (1983–2015) in

Division 8.c covered by the survey. From Fernández-Zapico et al. (2016 WD).

Year

kg

ha

ul1

Biomass

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

10 %

90 %

Year

Ind

ha

ul1

Number

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

10 %

90 %

Year

kg

haul

1

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

10 %

90 %

VIIIc Division



ysis of catches of velvet belly Etmopterus spinax in Scottish deep-water trawl survey from Neat et

al. (2015) showing (a) Box-whisker plot of numbers per hour for each year. (b) Smoothed function

of relative abundance of across years. (c) Smoothed function of relative abundance of across depths.






ysis of catches of greater lantern shark Etmopterus princeps in Scottish deep-water trawl survey

from Neat et al. (2015) showing (a) Box-whisker plot of numbers per hour for each year. (b)

Smoothed function of relative abundance of across years. (c) Smoothed function of relative abun-

dance of across depths. (d) Distribution of abundance across the survey area graded from large red

dots that indicate hauls of high abundance in close proximity to other hauls of high abundance to

small blue dots that indicate hauls of low abundance in close proximity to other hauls of low abun-

dance.


Figure 5.11. Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast Atlantic. Changes in bluntnose

six-gill shark Hexanchus griseus biomass index (Kg haul–1) during Porcupine survey (SpPGFS-WI-

BTS-Q4) time-series (2001–2015). Boxes mark parametric standard error of the stratified biomass

index. Lines mark bootstrap confidence intervals (a = 0.80, bootstrap iterations = 1000). From Ruiz-

Pico et al. (2016 WD).


bluntnose six-gill shark Hexanchus griseus in north Spanish shelf bottom trawl surveys (Spanish

IEO Q4-IBTS survey) 2004–2015 including all additional hauls out of the standard stratification

(>500 m) during the last decade. From Fernández-Zapico et al. (2016 WD).

Year

kg

haul

1

Hexanchus griseus

0

1

2

3

4

2001 2004 2007 2010 2013

10 %

90 %

Biomass

Year

Ind

haul

1

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2001 2004 2007 2010 2013

10 %

90 %

Number

Year

kg

haul

1

Dalatias licha

0

1

2

3

4

2001 2004 2007 2010 2013

10 %90 %

Biomass

Year

Ind

haul

1

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2001 2004 2007 2010 2013

10 %90 %

Number

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

Deania spp.

Me

an

bio

ma

ss (

Kg

)

02

46

8

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

Hexanchus griseus

Me

an

bio

ma

ss (

Kg

)

0.0

00

.10

0.2

0

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

Scymnodon ringens

Me

an

bio

ma

ss (

Kg

)

0.0

00

.10

0.2

0



ysis of catches of black dogfish Centroscymnus fabricii in Scottish deep-water trawl survey from

Neat et al. (2015) showing (a) Box-whisker plot of numbers per hour for each year. (b) Smoothed

function of relative abundance of across years. (c) Smoothed function of relative abundance of

across depths. (d) Distribution of abundance across the survey area graded from large red dots that

indicate hauls of high abundance in close proximity to other hauls of high abundance to small blue

dots that indicate hauls of low abundance in close proximity to other hauls of low abundance.



ysis of catches of Centroscymnus crepidater in Scottish deep-water trawl survey from Neat et al.

(2015) showing (a) Box-whisker plot of numbers per hour for each year. (b) Smoothed function of

relative abundance of across years. (c) Smoothed function of relative abundance of across depths.






ysis of catches of Apristurus microps in Scottish deep-water trawl survey from Neat et al. (2015)

showing (a) Box-whisker plot of numbers per hour for each year. (b) Smoothed function of relative

abundance of across years. (c) Smoothed function of relative abundance of across depths. (d) Dis-

tribution of abundance across the survey area graded from large red dots that indicate hauls of high

abundance in close proximity to other hauls of high abundance to small blue dots that indicate

hauls of low abundance in close proximity to other hauls of low abundance.



ysis of catches of Apristurus aphyodes in Scottish deep-water trawl survey from Neat et al. (2015)

showing (a) Box-whisker plot of numbers per hour for each year. (b) Smoothed function of relative

abundance of across years. (c) Smoothed function of relative abundance of across depths. (d) Dis-

tribution of abundance across the survey area graded from large red dots that indicate hauls of high

abundance in close proximity to other hauls of high abundance to small blue dots that indicate

hauls of low abundance in close proximity to other hauls of low abundance.

Documents

5 Other deep-water sharks and skates from the Northeast ...ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication Reports/Expert Group Report/acom/2016/WGEF/07 WGEF Report...WGEF (Vinnichenko and Fomin, 2009