1999 Trudgill Dialect Contact, Dialectology and Sociolinguistics

  • Upload
    vcautin

  • View
    243

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 1999 Trudgill Dialect Contact, Dialectology and Sociolinguistics

    1/8

  • 8/10/2019 1999 Trudgill Dialect Contact, Dialectology and Sociolinguistics

    2/8

  • 8/10/2019 1999 Trudgill Dialect Contact, Dialectology and Sociolinguistics

    3/8

  • 8/10/2019 1999 Trudgill Dialect Contact, Dialectology and Sociolinguistics

    4/8

  • 8/10/2019 1999 Trudgill Dialect Contact, Dialectology and Sociolinguistics

    5/8

  • 8/10/2019 1999 Trudgill Dialect Contact, Dialectology and Sociolinguistics

    6/8

  • 8/10/2019 1999 Trudgill Dialect Contact, Dialectology and Sociolinguistics

    7/8

  • 8/10/2019 1999 Trudgill Dialect Contact, Dialectology and Sociolinguistics

    8/8

    CONCLUSION

    Micro-sociolinguistics

    studies how linguistic changes spread from one individual to another

    as a result of accomrnodation in face-to-face interaction. Macro-leve1 sociolinguistics -

    geolinguis tics studies how such changes diffuse over wider geographical areas. And both

    geolinguistics and traditional dialectology provide explanations for why diffusion halts at

    particular locationsl resulting in particular contigurations of isoglosses.

    Accornmodation in face-to-face interaction, as studied by rnicro sociolingui~tics~playsan

    essential

    rolein

    the geographicaldiffusion

    of linguistic forrns. as studied at themacro-leve1

    by geolinguistics, leading to the location of isoglosses, as investigated. also at the rnacro-level.by dialectology. As we saw earlier, except in cases of rnigration, if linguistic forrns spread

    frorn place to place, they rnust also spread frorn speaker to speaker. One of the strengths of

    sociolinguistics and dialectology, or if you prefer, sociolinguistics including dialectology, is

    that thissubject

    (orsubjects)

    permits us to study language use, in real-life social contexts. bothby social groups and by individuals.

    REFERENCES

    Bolton. K. Kwok. H. (eds) (1992) Sociolinguistics Toda ,: Internationcil Perspectives.London: Routledge.

    Bottiglioni. G. (1954)[ Linguistic geog raphy> ),

    in Word. vol. 10: p. 375-87.

    Chambers. J.K. Trudgill. P. (1980)Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Frings. T. (1956) Spraclie und Gesclzichte. Halle: VEB Max Niemeyer Verlag

    Giles, H . (1973) [Accent m obility>l,inAntl~ropologicalLinguistics. vol. 15, p p. 87-105.

    Hyrnes, D. (1972) Foreword to J.A. Fishrnan, The Sociologyoflninguage.

    Rowley, Mass. :

    Newbury House.

    Kranzrnayer, E. (1956) Historische Luutgeographie des gesamtbairischen Dialektraumes.Graz: Bohlau.

    Trudgill. P. (1978) Sociolinguistic Patterns in BritishEnglish.

    London: Edward Arnold.

    Trudgill, P. (1986)Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell

    Wells,

    J.C. (1982) Accents ofEnglish. London: Carnbridge University Press.

    Citaderiias de Filalogn Ingleso vol. 8, 1999. pp. 1 8