1988 Issue 12 - Operation Rescue - Counsel of Chalcedon

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 1988 Issue 12 - Operation Rescue - Counsel of Chalcedon

    1/2

    Operation Rescue

    by Wayne Rogers

    Having been directly involved in

    Operation Rescue

    at

    one

    time, and hav

    ing initially supported its actions and

    tactics, I have on further thought chang

    ed my

    opinion as to the validity

    of

    the

    methods

    of

    Operation Rescue as a Chris

    tian method

    to

    stop abortions. Many ar

    guments and reasons have been well

    stated elsewhere. It is

    not

    my purpose

    or

    intent

    to

    repeat those arguments. I

    would like

    to

    add a consideration based

    on

    the use

    of

    the

    sword by

    Peter re

    corded in John 18:10-11.

    Those who are involved in Operation

    Rescue believe that Proverbs 24:11-12,

    Deliver those

    who

    are being taken

    away to death,

    and

    those who are

    staggering to slaughter, 0 hold them

    back .. is a

    command of God

    which

    must supersede obedience to the civil

    magistrate. Christians must obey the

    Higher law

    of

    God.

    In the first place, Proverbs 24:11-12

    cannot be taken as an automatic right to

    disobey the civil magistrate

    i

    he isn't

    doing his job. Prov. 24:11 -

    12

    is almost

    assuredly a quote

    from Psalm

    82 which

    is applied to the Civil Magistrate. More

    over, 24:21 tells us to Fear the Lord

    and the King .. Which are we

    to

    do?

    The point is,

    in order

    to resist the kings

    in

    order to rescue

    the

    perishing, we

    must have a Biblical basis to resist

    or

    defy the king first of all.

    Secondly, it seems

    to

    me that

    if

    Prov. 24:11-12 means

    what

    Operation

    Rescue says that

    it

    means, the disciples

    should have applied

    it

    at the time

    of

    Jesus arrest

    n

    order

    to

    deliver Him.

    Jesus,

    an

    innocent person, was about to

    be

    dragged away to death. Even if the

    disciples weren't fully aware that was

    what was about

    to

    happen, they cer

    tainly were after the trial and at the

    Wayne Rogers Is organlzinsr pastor

    of Christ Community Presoyterlan

    Church, a mission

    of

    Chalcedon

    Presbyterian Church, in Lawrence

    ville, Georgia.

    cross.

    But

    they did not rescue Him.

    Of course, many will say, Jesus for

    bade violence. Peter was using vio

    lence, the sword. The Scriptures do

    not

    allow us

    to

    use violence. That's why

    Operation Rescue is a peaceful non-vio

    lent protest

    It

    is my

    contention

    that

    Jesus was

    not simply condemning the use of vio

    lence, but that He was telling Peter

    not

    to use

    force at all.

    In other

    words,

    He

    wasn't hoping

    that Peter

    would con

    clude that while he couldn't use the

    sword,

    he

    could

    at

    least throw his body

    between the soldiers

    and

    Jesus. And, at

    the cross, should

    not

    the disciples have

    staged a demonstration, a protest?

    Shouldn't they have surrounded the

    cross so that Jesus couldn't have been

    nailed

    to it

    if Proverbs 2 4 : must

    be

    applied to rescuing

    the

    perishing

    under any and

    ll

    circumstances?

    Some will argue that Jesus had to

    die. Jesus

    Himself

    gives that as a

    reason

    why

    Peter must

    put up

    his

    sword.

    He

    must

    drink the

    cup that

    His

    Father has poured for Him. Yes,

    of

    course, Jesus

    had

    to die. That was the

    redemptive plan

    and

    purpose of God. It

    would have been ironic

    i f His

    disciples

    had

    died

    for Him

    in trying

    to

    protect

    or

    save

    Him

    from death. But, doesn't

    that

    tell

    us

    that

    we

    cannot apply Prov.

    24:11-12 across the board.

    Even

    Operap

    tion Rescue proponents qualify the pas

    sage by saying that while

    we

    must

    cue

    the perishing

    we

    cannot use wea

    pons,

    i t

    must

    be by

    non-violent,

    peace,

    .

    ful means. If

    it

    is qualified, then again,

    we must determine before

    we

    apply

    it

    to

    abortion that

    we do

    have Biblical

    grounds

    to

    disobey

    or

    resist the Civil

    Magistrate.

    Thirdly, Christ gives the ultimate

    reason why

    He

    told Peter

    to

    put

    up

    his

    sword. In John 18:36 Jesus said,

    My

    kingdom

    is

    not of

    this world.

    f

    my

    kingdom

    were

    of

    this world, then

    My

    servants would be fighting that I might

    not

    be

    delivered

    up to

    the Jews; but as

    it

    is,

    My

    kingdom is

    not

    of this

    realm.

    Now,

    when Jesus

    says

    that His king

    dom is

    not of

    this world,

    He

    is

    not

    saying that

    His

    kingdom

    is simply a

    spiritual

    kingdom

    with

    no

    relation

    to

    the kingdoms

    of

    this world.

    The word

    of' refers

    to

    origin,

    not

    location.

    His

    kingdom does

    not

    owe

    or have its

    origin

    from

    this world,

    or

    the kingdom

    of this world. It does not originate from

    this world, but from the heavenly or

    spiritual realm.

    And His

    remarks con

    cerning

    the

    use

    of

    weapons indicate that

    the

    kingdom of Christ

    does

    not

    come

    or

    advance itself,

    by use of

    physical force,

    violence,

    or

    coercion

    to

    accomplish its

    goals or purposes. What

    is

    appropriate

    for the kingdoms

    of men

    is not appro

    priate

    for

    the

    kingdom

    of

    God.

    Those involved in

    Operation Rescue

    insist

    that they are not

    using violence.

    They are

    using

    the tactics

    of

    non-vio

    lent,

    peaceful

    protest as did the civil

    rights

    movement of the

    60's. I believe

    that Operation

    Rescue

    is doing exactly

    what Jesus forbade

    in John

    18:36.

    Jesus'

    point

    wa

    s

    that

    His

    kingdom

    doesn't

    come

    by coercion or force. His

    kingdom

    doesn't

    force itself

    politically

    upon the societies

    of men. That

    is why

    we

    are

    to make

    disciples

    of

    men

    by

    pointing

    them

    to

    Christ

    without

    point

    ing a political

    sword

    at them.

    Without

    regeneration

    all

    social

    change

    is

    temporary

    at

    best. Unless the

    hearts

    of men

    are

    changed we go

    from

    one

    social

    change to

    another depending

    upon

    which

    group

    can

    muster enough

    votes or apply enough political pres

    sure. The weapons of our warfare are

    not carnal, but are spiritual, to the

    casting

    down

    of thrones

    and

    dominions,

    II Cor. 10:5.

    Operation

    Rescue

    is trying

    to

    force,

    to

    compel, to coerce, (even though they

    are

    not

    using

    the

    sword), a non-Chris

    tian,

    pagan

    culture to conform to the

    Word and

    will

    of

    God.

    I

    do not mean to

    imply that as

    Christians

    we

    should not

    work to

    bring

    the social and

    civil law

    into conformity

    to

    the

    law of God. Of course we

    should.

    But,

    we cannot use

    revolutionary tactics

    (Continued on page 40)

    The Counsel of Chalccdon, December, 1988

    P a g e 9

  • 8/12/2019 1988 Issue 12 - Operation Rescue - Counsel of Chalcedon

    2/2

    Operation Rescue

    .

    Rogers

    Continued from

    page 19

    or force.

    We

    do it the God-a appointed

    way of preaching, teaching, evangel

    ism, education, and

    as

    we can by elec

    tion. Every kingdom has the power to

    enforce its laws by means of the sword

    once

    it

    has achieved power

    or

    the right

    to rule. But we cannot use force to com

    pel the civil magistrate to comply with

    the Word of God.

    Having said this, the other arguments

    for Opetatipn Rescue simply do not

    justify its methods.

    It

    says that we can

    not

    use force to

    a c c o m p l i ~ h

    its goals.

    Therefore,

    it

    cannot reaily apply Prov.

    24:10-11 itself which says Hold back

    those who are staggering to death.

    -

    Tfie

    f m e

    imply

    tryin

    g

    co

    stoP

    man from entering the clinic and having

    an

    abortion. But,

    i f

    the woman goes

    in

    they say that they don't have the right

    to literally hold her back. Therefore,

    Operation Rescue is one atteinpt to get

    people to voluntarily give up having an

    abortion. But Operation Rescue advo

    cates are .quickly assuming the attitude

    that

    i f

    you aren't joining with them,

    you are not following the God-ordained

    program.

    Ii is

    at

    this point that Operation Res

    cue's real tactics become evident.

    uiti-

    mately, it is a tactic to apply political

    and social pressure by creating social

    tension in order to overwhelm and

    change the system. This is the spear

    head, the cutting edge

    of

    Operation Res

    cue.

    f

    you take this away, then you

    have to ask if the method would be that

    successful.

    . In all sincerity some are saying that .

    the reason that they are doing this is as

    a

    form

    of

    personal or corporate re

    pentance. But

    just

    as sincerely I ask,

    has God commanded that we do this in

    repentance? Is this a fast that God has

    required? I am sure that we do need to

    repent. But that doesn't mean that the

    ends justify the means.

    What is the responsibility of a Chris

    tian in a society which legalizes and

    pennits that which God forbids, that

    which is sinful? Obviously, not only

    should we not exercise our civil

    rights, but we should urge others not to

    practice sin.

    We

    should preach agairist

    J.

    Gresham Machen:

    A Biographical Memoir

    by Ned B. Stonehouse

    it. We should proclaim God's judgment

    upon those who practice it.

    The O.T. condemned Molech wor

    ship, which involved sacrificing chil

    dren in the fire, Lev. 18:21, 20:2-5,

    Deut. 12:31, 18:10-13. Yet, kings in

    Israel practiced Molech worship, I Kgs.

    11:31-33, I I Kgs. 23:12-14, 16:3f. The

    Prophets preached against and con

    demned the practice, declaring God's

    judgment against the n ation, Jer. 49:1-

    3, Ezek. 16: 20f, 20:26-31, 23:37, Isa.

    57:5. At no time did the Prophets urge

    the people to overthrow their kings. He

    called them to repentance. They pro

    claimed the righteous kingdom of the

    coming Messiah. It was this kingdom

    j

    I

    i .

    Non-Profit Or

    U.S. Postag

    . PAID

    -

    BULK RAT

    Permit No

    .

    1

    Check your

    mailing label

    (above)

    f he expiration code next

    to your name is s n or

    lower, we would very much

    appreciate a check from you

    in the amount

    of

    $25. to

    cover your subscription for .

    the coming

    12

    months,

    Renew now and

    re