Upload
oswin-johns
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Today’s Agenda
Updated themes Decision-making
theoriesCase: 6% solution
policy design Tools - instrument choice Configuration
Forest Practices Code Results-based regulation FRPA
Conclusion
October 31, 2013 2
Instrument Configuration formality - guidelines or rules? transparency simplicity congruence: rule varies to match
problem
October 31, 2013 3
design challenge:
accommodating spatial diversity
Objective: congruent, but simple and clear
1. Vary the rules to account for different circumstances (Prescriptive congruence)
2. Rely on professional judgment (Professional delegation)
3. Rely on local plans (Geographical delegation)
October 31, 2013 5
design challenge:
accommodating spatial diversity
October 31, 2013 6
congruence transparency simplicity
Prescriptive congruence
good good poor
Professional delegation
good poor good
Geographical delegation
good medium medium
Today’s Agenda
Updated themes Decision-making
theoriesCase: 6% solution
policy design Tools - instrument choice Configuration
Forest Practices Code Results-based regulation FRPA
Conclusion
October 31, 2013 7
October 31, 2013 8
BC Forest Practices: Evolution
pre-1994 – guidelines and plans 1995-2004 – Forest Practices Code (“the
Code”) mix of planning and practice regulations considered overly costly, complex, and
prescriptive by industry considered weak and inadequate by
environmentalists very high compliance
October 31, 2013 9
New Era Agenda - 2001
Election promise: Streamline the Forest Practices Code to establish a workable, results-based Code, with tough penalties for non-compliance
Cut the forestry regulatory burden by one-third within three years, without compromising environmental standards.
October 31, 2013 Hoberg – Policy Framework 10
“results-based code” 2004
Forest Range and Practices Act (2002) Simplified planning structure
▪ eliminated approval of site level plans increased reliance on “forest stewardship
plans” to propose results and strategies to meet specified government objectives
Major design tension: government’s desire to have strong default
standards industry’s desire for maximum flexibility
October 31, 2013 11
Why they stopped calling it “the code”
Pirates’ Code: must be a pirate
for the pirates’ code to apply
the code is more what you call guidelines than actual rules
Result-based regulation - concept
aka Performance-based regulation Focus on objective Leave means up to industry 3 components:
Characterize desired outcomes Specify performance standards Measure performance
October 31, 2013 12
Result-based regulation – challenges in forestry
For many forest values, we lack the specific knowledge to design measureable performance standards
October 31, 2013 13
but still provide flexibility in choice of practice
Standards that are sufficiently specific to be clear and measurable
FRPA solution
Rather than government-provided performance standards, require plans to include “results or strategies”
If operators prefer not to develop their own, they choose government “default standards”
October 31, 2013 14
October 31, 2013 15
FRPA Design
1. Objectives established by government
2. Some performance standards3. Forest Stewardship Plan prepared
by lisencee measurable results and strategies to
meet objectives may choose government “defaults” reviewed and approved by government
4. Auditing and Compliance5. Professional Reliance
October 31, 2013 16
FRPA Regulations - Objectiveshttp://www.for.gov.bc.ca/tasb/legsregs/frpa/frparegs/frparegs.htm
Objectives for 11 values In regulation, not statute
Soils Resource features Timber including forest health Recreation resources Fish Visual Quality Wildlife Cultural Heritage Resources Biodiversity Forage Water
“without unduly reducing the supply of timber from British Columbia's forests”
October 31, 2013 17
Example FPRA Objective: Riparian
The objective set by government for water, fish, wildlife and biodiversity within riparian areas is, without unduly reducing the supply of timber from British Columbia's forests, to conserve, at the landscape level, the water quality, fish habitat, wildlife habitat and biodiversity associated with those riparian areas.
October 31, 2013 18
FRPA Regulations http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/tasb/legsregs/frpa/frparegs/frparegs.htm
Performance based regulation for fish passage:
▪ Activities must not have a material adverse effect on fish passage in a fish stream
FRPA: Forest Stewardship Plans
5 year plan Map of development activities
proposed Results and strategies to address 11
FRPA values Or reliance on defaults
Reviewed and approved by government
Legal document, basis for enforcementOctober 31, 2013 19
October 31, 2013 20
FPRA “defaults” = Code rules
Riparian Class
Riparian Management Area
(metres)
Riparian Reserve Zone (metres)
Riparian Management Zone
(metres)
S1-A 100 0 100
S1-B 70 50 20
S2 50 30 20
S3 40 20 20
S4 30 0 30
S5 30 0 30
S6 20 0 20
FRPA Implementation
Sample plan from Tolko
Forest Practices Board Report 2006 FSPs inscrutable and
not effective for public review
Industry is not committing itself to enforceable or measureable results, preferring instead ▪ Default requirements▪ Strategies without
measure outcomesOctober 31, 2013 21
78%
8%
4% 10%
Forest Practice Com-mitments for Soils, Biod-
iversity and Riparian Areas
1. Default Practice
2. Default with Minor Change
3. Land Use Objec-tive
4. Alternative Prac-tice
Leah Malkinson Thesis
Conclusion
Design dilemmas – optimal specificity Tradeoffs between
congruence, simplicity, transparency
Due to measureability problems, FRPA not as results-based as envisionedOctober 31, 2013 22
New Themes
A major challenge for forest policy making is designing policies to accommodate spatial diversity
Forest practices regulation in BC relies on a combination of vague performance objectives, practice requirements, and planning requirements. Measurability challenges have limited efforts to develop a results-based framework
October 31, 2013 23