38
1 Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium rays and 137 Cs rays on wild and p53- deficient mice. Toshiyuki Umata Radioisotope Research Center, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan EMRAS , Theme 3 WG tritium

1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium rays and 137 Cs rays on

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

1

◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk.

◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium rays and 137Cs rays on wild and p53-deficient mice.

Toshiyuki Umata

Radioisotope Research Center, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan

EMRAS , Theme 3Ⅱ WG tritium

Page 2: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

2

◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk.

◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium rays and 137Cs rays on wild and p53-deficient mice.

Page 3: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

3

Page 4: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

4

OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE

To investigate the biological effects of tritium on mouse at low dose-rate, mice were exposed to -rays by continuous administration of various concentration of tritiated drinking water throughout their lives at low dose-rates.

CONCLUSION CONCLUSION

These studies revealed that there exists two types of threshold dose-rates, not only in the frequency of thymic lymphomas but also in the life-shortening. In the life-shortening, it seems that the effect of tritium rays is greater than that of rays.

Page 5: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

5

blood

organ tissue(average of brain,Liver, muscle)

7

Page 6: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

6

Dose-rate, Gy/day         0.24           0.0 96       0.048           0.024           0.010         0Number of mice used    45 38 60 60 53 67MST, days      165±36        259±52       414±66     481±112       622±121        811±134

Thymic lymphoma 29(64)[162±28] 22(58)[273±51] 15(25)[415±53] 4(7)[508±202] 3(6)[589±32] 0(0)

Non-thymic lymphoma 5(11)[146±27] 4(11)[229±24] 12(20)[433±82] 9(15)[504±120] 11(21)[609±70] 12(18)[787±129]Reticular cell neoplasm 2(5)[179±15] 5(8)[390±67] 12(20)[485±144] 10(19)[570±150] 4(6)[760±161]Ovarian tumor      2(5)[201±18] 4(7)[431±60] 8(13)[511±98] 11(21)[641±114] 4(6)[868±149]Haemangiosarcoma             2(5)[331±21] Fibrosarcoma 2(3)[431±58] 4(7)[467±97] 6(11)[607±90] 4(6)[871±179]Harderian gland tumor                             2(3)[423±81] 2(3)[537±75]Lung tumor                    1(2)[464] 3(5)[460±30] 8(15)[736±84] 4(6)[812±24]Skin tumor 1(2)[401] Bladder tumor                                               1(2)[580]Rhabdomyosarcoma    1(2)[298]            Mammary tumor                                                           2(4)[582±58]Hepatic tumor                                                            2(4)[685±23] 3(4)[696±41]Adenal gland tumor                                                          1(2)[623]Splenic tumor                                                                            2(3)[827±19]Stomac tumor                                                                           1(2)[912]Double tumor-bearing    0(0) 0(0) 0(0) 2(3) 10(19) 5(8)Tumor-bearing mouse 34(76) 32(84) 42(70) 42(70) 4(83) 41(54)

( );% [ ];Mean latent period ±SD, dayMST: mean survival time or mean time of death after the initiation of the exposure.

Table1 Tumor developments in mice at different dose-rates of HTO

Page 7: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

7

Number of mice    69   51 120 55 58 120MST, days      810          795          804       790             758       804Thymic lymphoma 0(0) 0(0) 0(0) 0(0) 0(0) 3(5)[556±40]

  Non-thymic lymphoma 16(23)[773±147] 14(27)[799±113] 30(25)[787±129] 14(25)[769±137] 17(29)[779±84] 11(20)[728±97]  Fibrosarcoma         5(7)[860±161] 4(8)[81±126] 9(8)[838±145] 5(9)[836±36] 13(22)[767±116] 5(9)[835±18]  Ovarian tumor   4(6)[868±149] 2(4)[885±80] 6(5)[875±121] 3(5)[829±187] 2(3)[811±197] 5(9)[819±111]  Liver   tumor         6(9)[800±151] 3(6)[729±202] 9(8)[776±168] 4(7)[939±62] 10(17)[844±120] 1(2)[729]  Lung tumor   3(4)[811±24] 2(4)[967±22] 5(4)[873±23] 4(7)[847±115] 1(2)[852]  Other tumors 3(4)[855±40] 3(6)[775±139] 6(5)[815±110] 4(7)[920±78] 3(5)[879±91] 2(4)[941±3]Multiple tumor-bearing 4(6) 2(4) 6(5) 3(5) 4(7) 2(4)Tumor-carrying mice 33(48) 26(51) 59(49) 27(49) 45(78) 26(46)

Dose-rate, mGy/day     Control 1*         Control 2       Total control            0.2            0.9            3.6(Cumulative dose, Gy) (0)       (0)      (0)      (0.17±0.03) (0.71±0.13) (2.62±0.41)

( );% [ ];Mean latent period ±SD, dayMST: mean survival time or mean time of death after the initiation of the exposure. *Previously reported (Yamamoto et al. 1995)

Table2 Tumor developments in mice at different dose-rates of HTO

Page 8: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

8

50 mGy/day=18 Gy/y

25%

400 days

2×109 Bq/L

20 Gy

Page 9: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

9

Page 10: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

10

SUMMARYSUMMARY

◆ There exists two types of threshold dose-rates, essential and practical, not only in the frequency of thymic lymphoma but also in the life-shortening. In the life-shortening, it seems that the effect of tritium rays is greater than that of rays.

◆ Threshold dose-rate in the frequency of thymic lymphomas was12 (0.9) mGy/day. And that in the life-shortening was 2 (0.2) mGy/day (1.8 Gy).

Page 11: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

11

◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk.

◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium rays and 137Cs rays on wild and p53-deficient mice.

Page 12: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

12

OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES

Although nuclear fusion facilities, such as ITER, are ex

pected to require about 2,000 PBq of tritium for their “fu

el”, only a small part of these tritium may be released fr

om the facilities. Therefore, an exposure condition of tri

tium radiation from nuclear fusion reactor could be a lo

ng-term exposure at a low dose-rate. So, analytical met

hods sensitive to radiation at low dose or low dose-rate

are needed. In the present study, the mutagenic effects

of tritiated water at a low dose-rate was investigated usi

ng wild type and p53-/- mice, then compared that of 137C

s rays.

Page 13: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

13

Features of p53-/- mice

・ p53 is a tumor suppressor gene.

・ p53 plays the role as guardian of genome.

・ p53-/- mice have no apoptotic activity, which remove damaged cells from tissue.

・ Life of p53-/- mice are short cause of occurrence of tumor. : ~ 8 months   (wilt-type mice : ~28 months)

Page 14: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

14

Preparation of T lymphocytes for Mutation Analysis

spleens

gently dissociate

filtration

hemolysisof red cells

nylon wool

37℃   1 h

FACS

cell suspension

5 x 105 cells

T-lymphocytes

・ PE conjugated anti-CD4 antibody・ FITC conjugated anti-CD3 antibody

Page 15: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

15

TCR mutation assay (principle)

If mutation is formed in T cell receptor, CD3 is not able to be transfered into cell membrane.

Extracellular

Cytoplasm

CD4CD3T cell receptor

irradiation

Extracellular

Cytoplasm

Mut Res 1997, Meth Mol Biol 2005, Radiat Res 2006

Page 16: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

16

PE

-ant

i CD

4

PE

-ant

i CD

4

FITC-anti CD3 FITC-anti CD3

0 Gy (control mouse) 3 Gy (irradiated mouse)

CD3-CD4+ CD3-CD4+CD3+CD4+ CD3+CD4+

50191

37= = 7.4×10-4

TCR VFCD3+CD4+

CD3-CD4+

=

50097

188= = 37.5×10-4

TCR VFCD3+CD4+

=CD3-CD4+

Estimation of TCR variant fraction (mutation frequency)

Page 17: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

17Mice were irradiated by 137Cs -rays simulation-irradiation system in 2.3 days as an effective half-life.

Days after the start of irradiation

Intraperitoneal injection of HTO (266 MBq/mouse)and start of simulation-irradiation (0.7 mGy/min at start)   

Analysis of apoptosis[ p53+/+, p53-/-]

Acute irradiation(3Gy)

Analysis of mutation[p53+/+, p53-/-]

absorbed dose

dose rate

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

Dos

e ra

te (

mG

y/m

in)

0

1

2

3

4

Cum

ulat

ive

abso

rbed

dos

e (G

y)

0.8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Days after the start of irradiation

Irradiation methods Irradiation methods8 week old normal and p53-/- mice were used.

Page 18: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

18

137Cs -rays simulation- irradiation systemfor low dose-rate

Page 19: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

19

137Cs -rays irradiation equipment for high dose-rate

Page 20: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

20

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

*

**

Var

iant

fra

ctio

n (x

10-4)

P < 0.01*

   p53+/+ mice p53-/- mice

35

40

: spontaneous: HTO: 137Cs - rays ( < 0.7 mGy/min): 137Cs - rays (0.86 Gy/min)

3 Gy

Page 21: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

21

Induced TCR variant fractions

p53+/+

p53-/-

exposure

HTO

simulation

acute -rays

HTO

simulation

acute -rays

induced variant fraction

7.6 x 10-4

4.5 x 10-4

20.1 x 10-4

miceRelative value

14.2 x 10–4

1.0

1.7

3.9 x 10-4

0

-

-

0.3

1.0

0.4

1.0-

-

-

-

A / B A / C

A

B

C

A

B

C

Page 22: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

22

A D

B E

C F

A

p53+/+ p53-/-

spontaneous

HTO

137Cs

Page 23: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

23

SUMMARYSUMMARY

◆ To evaluate the mutagenic effects of tritiated water, TCR variant fractions using wild type and p53-/- mice

were investigated.

◆ When compared on the basis of the induced TCR variant fractions in p53 deficient mice at 3 Gy, tritium rays appear to be 1.7 times more mutagenic han rays.

◆ p53-dependent apoptosis could suppress the increase of TCR variant fraction induced by tritium rays.

Page 24: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

24

Thank you for your attention

Radioisotope Research CenterRadioisotope Research Center

Page 25: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

25

Page 26: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

26

Page 27: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

27Mice were irradiated by 137Cs -rays simulation-irradiation system in 2.3 days as an effective half-life.

Days after the start of irradiation

Intraperitoneal injection of HTO (266 MBq/mouse)and start of simulation-irradiation (0.7 mGy/min at start)   

Analysis of apoptosis[ p53+/+, p53-/-]

Acute irradiation(3Gy)

Analysis of mutation[p53+/+, p53-/-]

absorbed dose

dose rate

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

Dos

e ra

te (

mG

y/m

in)

0

1

2

3

4

Cum

ulat

ive

abso

rbed

dos

e (G

y)

0.8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Days after the start of irradiation

Irradiation methods Irradiation methods8 week old normal and p53-/- mice were used.

Page 28: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

28

Induced TCR variant fractions

p53+/+

p53-/-

exposure

HTO

simulation

acute -rays

HTO

simulation

acute -rays

induced variant fraction

7.6 x 10-4

4.5 x 10-4

20.1 x 10-4

miceRelative value

14.2 x 10–4

1.0

1.7

3.9 x 10-4

0

-

-

0.3

1.0

0.4

1.0-

-

-

-

A / B A / C

A

B

C

A

B

C

Page 29: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

29

A D

B E

C F

A

p53+/+ p53-/-

spontaneous

HTO

137Cs

Page 30: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

30

End Point administration dose(Gy) control RBE reference

LD50/30     i.p    4~8      1.7 Furchner Radiat Res 1957

Contraction of spleen i.p 1 ~10 1.3 - 1.5 Storer et al. Radiat Res and Thymus 1957   genomic instability of 0.6 1 - 2 Kozkowski et al.

lymphocyte Int J Radiat Biol 2001

apoptosis of crypt cell   0.13~0.28 1.4 - 2.1   Ijiri Radiat Res 1989

survival of oocyte          0.055 1.6 - 3 Dobson et al. Radiat Res 1976

Researches for biological effect of HTO on mice

・対照放射線i.p. : intraperitoneally

Page 31: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

31

The T lymphocyte is one of the most radiosensitive cells in the body. Several genetic end points are used to measure mutant fractions in blood cells. The T-cell receptor (TCR) gene is utilized for in vivo and in vitro mutation assays in both human and animal cells. It is known that the TCR-α and TCR-β chains are only expressed on the cell surface following the formation of large molecular complexes with CD3 chains. If either the TCR-α or -β chain gene is not expressed, the TCRαβ/CD3 complex cannot be transported to the cellular membrane, resulting in the accumulation of defective complexes in the cytoplasm. Thus, inactivation mutations in either the TCR-α or TCR-β genes in CD4+ T cells manifest as CD3-CD4+ variant T cells, that can be detected via two-color flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies against the CD3 and CD4 molecules. In the present study, the TCR assay was utilized to quantify the genotoxic effects of tritium exposure in mice.

principle principle

Page 32: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

32

Days Spleen Kidney Liver Thymus Ovary Muscle Blood Femur Tibia

1 0.062 0.0582 0.057 0.0567 0.0365 0.0435 0.0624 0.0959 0.0767

2 0.108 0.101 0.0885 0.0985 0.0644 0.0763 0.109 0.169 0.134

4 0.166 0.157 0.138 0.152 0.102 0.119 0.169 0.266 0.205

7 0.208 0.198 0.174 0.191 0.132 0.152 0.212 0.341 0.257

12 0.23 0.221 0.194 0.211 0.15 0.17 0.236 0.386 0.285

18 0.236 0.226 0.199 0.217 0.156 0.176 0.242 0.397 0.293

23 0.237 0.228 0.2 0.218 0.158 0.177 0.244 0.4 0.295

30 0.237 0.228 0.2 0.218 0.159 0.178 0.245 0.402 0.297

37 0.238 0.229 0.201 0.219 0.159 0.178 0.246 0.403 0.298

∞ 0.239 0.231 0.201 0.219 0.16 0.184 0.232 0.395 0.303∞

J UOEH 1988

Table   Tissue cumulative absorbed dose by HTO (Gy)

・   18.5MBq HTO were i.p. injected

7日間で3 Gy の吸収線量を達成するには3/ 0.208   X 18.5 =   266 MBq  を接種する。

Page 33: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

33

低線量でのがん発生の線量ー効果モデル低線量でのがん発生の線量ー効果モデル

a0

0Dose

( low dose )

( high dose )

spontaneous

推定域

実測域

LNT hypothesis

Fre

quen

cy o

f T

umor

(%

)Dose-effect model

Page 34: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

34

Page 35: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

35

p53 System against Genotoxic Stressp53 System against Genotoxic Stress

3 Gy3 Gy3 Gy3 Gy

p53p53 (–/–) (–/–)

Background level

p53p53 (+/+) (+/+)

HighDose-rate

LowDose-rate

HighDose-rate

LowDose-rate

Va

rian

t fr

act

ion

Background level

p53 (–/–)p53 (–/–)

repair repair errorrepair

apoptosis

abnormal cellremoval of abnormal cell

normal cell

p53 (+/+)p53 (+/+)

normal cell

repair error

Page 36: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

36

Dose response curves at different dose-rate of rays for the TCR variant fractions in the splenic T-lymphocytes of p53+/+ and p53–/– mice

Kato et al, J Radiat Res 2002

0

0 1 2 3

Dose (Gy)

Var

iant

fra

ctio

n (x

10

–4)

50

40

20

10

30

p53 –/–

p53 +/+

(@ 1,017 mGy/min)

1 2 3

Dose (Gy)

00

Var

iant

fra

ctio

n (x

10

–4)

50

40

20

10

30 p53 –/–

p53 +/+

@ 1.2 mGy/min

Page 37: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

37

OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE

There are a number of important variables that may alter the precise estimation of the radiation weighting factor (WR) for tritium rays. For instance, the interpretation of published experimental studies is complicated by the fact that the dose rates of reference radiations are frequently much higher than those normally received by tritium internal exposure. To resolve these uncertainties and determine the most appropriate WR for tritium rays, the mutagenic effects of tritium rays on spleen T lymphocytes of Trp53+/+ and Trp53-/- mice was compared to chronic or acute 137Cs irradiation.

Page 38: 1 ◆ Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk. ◆ A comparison of the mutagenic effects of tritium  rays and 137 Cs  rays on

38